Western Center for Journalism
July 11, 2012 By Daniel Noe
So many of Obama’s voters were ignorant and uninformed about the man himself because they got all caught up in the hype and lofty rhetoric. But to make the same mistake again wouldn’t be just stupid; it woud be, in the words of Constitutional lawyer, scholar and best-selling author Mark Levin, “national suicide.”
From http://www.westernjournalism.com/mark-levin-obama-re-election-would-be-national-suicide/
Bull,
Love Mark Levin. He is so good!
Thanks for putting up this video. So true what Levin says. And sad.
And National Suicide is right on target.
Pepp, yea he’s on the mark.
Reblogged this on The Busy Post.
He’s absolutely right. I am seeing some GOOD signs,however. Here in the People’s Republic of Ann Arbor,a town that was pretty much solid Obama in ’08,there is a glaring lack,outside of a few stickers on cars,signage FOR the cluck this time. In ’08 in my neighborhood,there were within 2 blocks of the house here,no fewer than 20 or more lawn signs. So far, this cycle,ONE. When I walk my 2 Goldens,I try to get’em to pee on the sign,so I can get a pic of for y’all.
Clyde, yea some good signs. I agree. Even on he web it is not as shall we say radical for Zero this time. Hey one picture of that would be worth a thousand words. In rural NY the writing is on the wall for the state but they are not as in your face. Too much embarassment. Though I think closer to election we might see it crank up…like when the unions send out their soldiers. As I say, in the words of BB King, “the thrill is gone, baby.”
Hey Clyde, we could do a little fishing experiment. Put up a Romney sign and see how long it takes for someone to steal it.
Christ Almighty a Romney sign here would be like garlic to Dracula. The moonbats would most likely BURN it on my lawn!!!. Of course,then I could hose’em. With a 30.06
Clyde, LOL iguess that would attract them. LMAO.That’s the way it is here. Why no one does anything to their beloved Obama signs? Heck, there might still be some from 08 some place. But your dogs tinkle might do the trick and turn them brown. (the color they should be)
So many is not all.
Even ignorance has some limitations
Levin’s point was so many.
Many Obama supporters were ignorant. Sure were. Remember the people that never voted before, people that did not care to know anything but they just “liked the guy”, and people who just vote Party line anyway – not like they were going to vote against him, especially after his promises. And otherwise people who wanted to remain ignorant.
Then you have some who applied ‘a willing suspension of disbelief’ about Obama. That is not just ignorance. That is those who consciously would not accept reality of a totally inexperienced man, who had not run anything before, and believed he was the answer to all our problems. That takes some effort other than sheer ignorance. We know this was willful because they attacked Sarah Palin for being inexperienced and totally unprepared, as they said. And she was running as VP, even though she had much more experience than the grand wizard, Obama.