To Russia with love

What was it Obama told Medvedev? (when he thought no one could hear him) I think it was “This is my last election. After my election I have more flexibility.” Yea, that was it.

“Russia’s recent tests of ballistic missiles are clear signs Moscow is making good on announced threats to prepare preemptive strikes on U.S. missile defenses, a senior House Republican disclosed this week.
Rep. Michael Turner (R., Ohio) stated in a June 12 letter to senior Obama administration officials that he is also concerned Russia appears to be taking steps to abandon a 1980s treaty banning intermediate-range missiles.
Additionally, Russian missile developments “are clear evidence by Russia of plans for its withdrawal from the Intermediate-range Nuclear Forces Treaty,” he said.

…Stike three!

“The May missile test was “the third new ICBM announced since the ratification of the New START treaty,” he said.
“The pattern of activities that are now being reported would completely eviscerate the INF Treaty’s impact on Russia while the U.S. continues to comply with the Treaty’s ‘zero option,’” he said.

Eviscerate? Not in the wonderful world of the Obama administration.

In this game of baseball, three strikes doesn’t mean you’re out, it only means we continue reductions and “honor” the treaty, which apparently Russia is not. (and probably never intended to)  Maybe that is what Obama meant about “flexibility”,  that he agrees to accept whatever they want to do, despite the treaty. Obviously,  in their eyes this treaty was only meant to restrict us not them.

But really now, is “more flexibility” the prescription to deal with Russia? I get it, they are doing this because we need to be more flexible. (as if he hasn’t already been) And their flagrant violations of the ballyhooed treaty go on, without a word or mention from officials in Washington. Crickets.

Oh but the closer it gets to election, expect him to tout the Start Treaty as one of his signature successes…right along with his successful green energy and jobs, and right by his lack of a real energy plan, which he likes to call an “all-of-the-above approach”

But Obama appears comfortable with an anything-goes policy from Russia with disdain. You just know what is needed is “flexibility” from US.

14 comments on “To Russia with love

  1. Just Gene says:

    Come on bullright – you weren’t aware the naked Emporer was flexible – how else could he walk around with his head up his butt !!


  2. flyoverhere says:

    The part that worries me most, “…….this is my last election”. Was that a little hint that he has no plans to turn over the reins of power, ever……..


  3. Davetherave says:

    Hey bull; Rave here. Good post buddy. That sumbitch in our White House is flexible with everything except sticking to our laws and our constitution. As far as that is concerned; he will never be flexible in sticking to our laws and constitution, but rather do everything to piss on them with his last dying breath. He hates everything about our nation. Was that the last welcome sound of no more oxygen in at 1600…???? 🙂


    • bullright says:

      Dave, good to see you. Thought maybe you forgot the address. (Bull Lane) He’s sort of like Gumby on everything he sticks his nose in — spineless. More of a rabid animal, there ain’t no cure. I bet he’s working on another “speech” right now for another apology and lecture to us “clinger” bigots. The press won’t cover any of it.


      • Davetherave says:

        Hey bull,

        I certainly wouldn’t forget your address. I’ve been living with my parents for the very most part helping take care of dad. I simply jump on when I get the chance; just quick stops at my home to pick up a new change of clothes.. Have a great day buddy.


  4. clyde says:

    Is ANYONE surprised Russia is flexing muscle? The WHOLE DAMN PLANET knows the “sumbitch”,as Dave eloquently puts it, is weaker than a newborn kitten. Also no surprise if the BECS were to start some shit around Halloween,maybe?


  5. pepperhawk says:

    LOL! And to think of the look on Putin’s face this week was priceless. He could barely keep his contempt in check. Nobody likes a weak leader, nobody and it causes that country’s leader to disrespect you, not love you. The LIC may have had a great relationship with the gay boy Medveded, but Putin is a whole different story. I laughed myself silly to see Putin barely holding onto his temper. He looked like he wanted to strangle the sob. Maybe we will get some love from Russia in the KGB’s former nefarious ways.


    • bullright says:

      Did you ever think ten years ago you would see such a spectacle? And when he said “flexibility” Putin jumped to defend the comrade-in-chief. I’ve seen everything now.



Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s