Dems oppose Gosnell resolution

Dems derail condemnation of ‘willful murder’

Substitute statement seeking prevention of ‘abusive’ treatment
by Michael Carl — WND

Two Senate Democrats apparently have blocked a resolution that would have condemned Philadelphia abortion murder case defendant Kermit Gosnell.

The proposed resolution cited Gosnell for the “untrained and uncertified personnel performing abortions, nonmedical personnel administering medications, grossly unsanitary and dangerous conditions, violations of law regarding storage of human remains, and above all, willful murder of infants born alive by severing their spinal cords.”

Instead, a substitute resolution expresses the sense of the Senate that “abusive, unsanitary, or illegal health care practices should be … prevented.”

The original cited Gosnell by name; the substitute only references “a physician at the Women’s Medical Society of Philadelphia.”

[Photo: Boxer victory LA Weekly]

It was Sens. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., and Barbera Boxer, D-Calif., who stopped consideration of the resolution by dismissing the reports of infanticides that took place at Gosnell’s business.


To all the usual suspects, take a big bow.

It’s infanticide, stupid!

You’ve probably seen clips of this performance in Florida, but it’s worth seeing the whole video. Here is Planned Parenthood offering their moral support for infanticide.

Video: Planned Parenthood Official Argues for Right to Post-Birth Abortion

Florida legislators considering a bill to require abortionists to provide medical care to an infant who survives an abortion were shocked during a committee hearing this week when a Planned Parenthood official endorsed a right to post-birth abortion.

Alisa LaPolt Snow, the lobbyist representing the Florida Alliance of Planned Parenthood Affiliates, testified that her organization believes the decision to kill an infant who survives a failed abortion should be left up to the woman seeking an abortion and her abortion doctor.

Rep. Daniel Davis then asked Snow, “What happens in a situation where a baby is alive, breathing on a table, moving. What do your physicians do at that point?”

“I do not have that information,” Snow replied. “I am not a physician, I am not an abortion provider. So I do not have that information.”

Paraphrasing: ‘Oh, right, like you must mean that irrelevant, ancillary thing called a baby. Oh that!’

Sometimes they just don’t have the words to express their agenda.

H/T to Pepp for the articles.

7 comments on “Dems oppose Gosnell resolution

  1. Just Gene says:

    If they had no limit on the age for cutting spinal cords, I would willingly cut those of all the bastards who think the process is OK.


    • bullright says:

      Gene, and just think you could provide the service free at no charge.


    • Davetherave says:

      Gene, you remind me of a question I always love to ask: Why is it that all the people that are pro-murder already born??? Do you think they wish their mom had been pro-murder and they’d got stabbed with scissors and not even be here?? I seriously doubt they would support their mom’s right to do so…


      • Just Gene says:

        Your right Dave, and think of how many women wont be able to celebrate Mother’s Day – sure as hell glad my mom didn’t believe in murder even though she may have considered it up until the time I left home – RIP mom.


  2. Davetherave says:

    Excellent article Bull! Snow sucks at trying to give a snow job! I’m no MD either, but just like me that lame ass Snow knows exactly what happens. Side question: How in the hell did the leftist radicals steal the term Planned Parenthood for baby killing mills?? Wouldn’t Planned UNparenthood fit better? Sorry…I digress as usual.

    I once again must go back to the original argument of Roe and the SCROTUM of that time ruled to allow abortions with their lame ass excuse no one could definitively tell them when life actually begins. Gave the commie, leftist radicals their inch and boy have they ran miles with it.

    Paradox: Someone shoots a pregnant women and the women and baby die the shooter can be charged with double murder. I totally agree with that, because two “lives” were murdered. The leftist wing nuts even agree on that…buuuuuuuut….botched abortion, living breathing baby laying on a table and to them a women should still have the choice to murder the child. Am I the only one that sees the majorly f*cked up logic here???? Damn our society has fallen into a den of inequity…”don’t look back or you’ll turn into a pillar of salt!”


    • bullright says:

      Dave, that sums it up, give them an inch and they take 50 miles. All this based on a “decision”. I must continue to repeat that. Okay time for a survey on dumb, low-info amerikan voters, how many of them believe its a law or in the bill of rights? I’m not even going to make a guess.

      Exactly, oh they want it both ways. How about a woman on the way to have an abortion being struck by a car killing the baby, or killing both. That would be a lawsuit, cha-ching!.

      Oh, its some really messed up logic (if you can even use that term…) I think its called insanity, but they swim in this stuff. In this case don’t look back either, it might remind you of a time before a decision took our sanity.


  3. clyde says:

    When it comes to libtards, I’m all FOR post-birth abortion. Ask one of these “geniuses” why THEIR mother didn’t abort THEM.



Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s