Would Obama Stoop To Blackmail ?

This possibility is no surprise considering Obama’s operational tactics. With his campaign now operating as Organize for Action, the same methods must be alive and well, and popular. (from the same cast that brought us Obama 1.0 and 2.0)

YouViewed/Editorial

Was Chief Justice Roberts Blackmailed Into Supporting Obamacare?

 

 

 

 

” In 2012, Chief Justice John Roberts cast the deciding vote for the Supreme Court’s ruling that ObamaCare was a legal tax. Conservatives were beyond stunned. Roberts’ decision was a narrow, weaving, legal mess, unlike the clear, assured opinions he usually wrote. What the heck happened?

There were also some subterranean murmurings that the Obama administration was blackmailing Chief Justice Roberts. This was a bit far-fetched. We all knew that Obama habitually practiced a Chicago-approach to politics, one that saw him digging up secret dirt on his opponents, releasing it, and forcing them out of the election. For example, when Obama ran for the U.S. Senate in 2004, his opponent was the popular Jack Ryan. As the campaign progressed badly for Obama, secret court filings from Ryan’s divorce “miraculously” appeared with unproven allegations from his former wife about…

View original post 45 more words

9 comments on “Would Obama Stoop To Blackmail ?

  1. Davetherave says:

    Damn good post YouViewed and thanks for re-blogging Bull! What Chief Dumbass Roberts did in REWRITING Obamacide, so he could vote it as lawful has had a nasty stench to it the entire time. When Kennedy writes such a scathing brief calling out Roberts the way he did you know something is f*cked up! Something went on for sure; bribery or death threats. Neither would be below the Pharaoh.

    SCOTUS judges have zero business or the constitutional authority to rewrite legislation and that is exactly what Back Stabbing Roberts did! Their only job is to rule whether the law is constitutional (that was already written and passed) and that’s it. Roberts did something I’d never heard of in my entire life or in my knowledge of history. Again; Kennedy is a middle of the road guy (and the least partisan on the SCOTUS IMO) that I believe does stick to the constitutional laws granted the SCOTUS and the fact he was SO pissed off at Roberts speaks volumes and tells us Roberts went too far off the rails. Something definitely influenced his decision from the outside. Roberts quite frankly is someone I now view as a traitor and another drag queen wanna be king minion!

    Like

    • bullright says:

      Dave, my sentiments too. So much stinks it is beyond the barnyard flavor of the day.

      Like

    • bullright says:

      Or, if the goal was to make dang sure no branch of government has an ounce of credibility and respect left, then he probably succeeded.

      Like

      • Davetherave says:

        Bull, I think I’ll go with your second conclusion…NO branch now has ANY credibility! I wrote off the legislative branch along time ago and I don’t know how, but Barry also got to the SCOTUS. I must admit once again the sumbitch did it well! Bastid has every branch betraying the people!

        Like

  2. pepperhawk says:

    Bull,

    I suppose Roberts could have been blackmailed. It seems par for the course with the King’s tactics.

    I really don’t know what to think about this. The other thing is Roberts sided with the liberals on another case that is outrageous and that one included the cops being able to storm your house if “they smelled pot” around your house. At the time I could not believe Roberts would go for this type of invasion against the 4th Amendment. No judge should ever allow this.

    Perhaps he’s been blackmailed all along. I put nothing past the King’s treachery.

    Like

    • bullright says:

      Pepp,

      I have to say Obastid deserves the presumption of guilt after all he’s done. (and we probably don’t even know half of it yet) He makes Nixon look like a choir boy. If they can defy the Constitution everywhere else, then what prevents them from doing a little record research? And what better target than someone who is supposedly squeaky clean with ethics. And then doing it just to prove they can do it….so nothing is out of their grubby fingers.

      Like

      • pepperhawk says:

        Bull,

        Oh I do agree. I don’t think anything goes on up there without his fingerprints on it. If Roberts did get his adoptive children from Ireland then I can see where they would use that against him. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure that out.

        Everything that is targeted against his so called “enemies” comes from him IMHO.

        Like

  3. clyde says:

    Given the Chicago way, yeah, I can buy the notion the asshats have something, real or imagined, on the Chief Justice. WQould have been better if he had just shot this down, and took his lumps,IMHO. I’d tend to believe HIS version of dirt over the Axelroidian version any day.

    Like

Comments...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s