News drought for lamestream, and the price of ground beef

In a lull of news for media to cover, what do they do? If you have not had your fill of royal watching, which is something like whale watching for enthusiasts, then you must have blacked out the news.

It is not entirely media’s fault that news is a bit slow, considering all the scandals or news they cannot cover and the controversies of the administration that are pretty much off limits. That left the Zimmerman trial and the royal birth as top billing for media coverage. Everyone loves a good racist story or the countdown to a birth from UK’s royals.

But that is real news, they insist. We now know the baby is worth a billion dollars. You cannot take it with you when you die, but nothing says one can’t be born into a billion-dollar net worth.

One only has to look at all the things which are not worthy of media coverage: Benghazi, IRS, Fast and Furious, or ObamaCare’s many looming turns. Next to those, camping outside a hospital to see a baby brought out is a welcomed announcement. They could use anything about George Zimmerman to fill the gaps. If it was the civil war, they’d call the uniforms controversial. Media has its unique way of framing what is important.

I guess that is why Obama took to the campaign trail talking about the economy. It gives them something else they are permitted to talk about. That’s a relief, after the Royal baby arrived they were running low on subject matter. How many weeks have they dragged out the Zimmerman trial?

So Obama debuts his latest campaign speech attack, which is just like all the others, to blame Republicans “for engaging in an “endless parade of distractions, political posturing and phony scandals.”

“Washington has taken its eye off the ball,” Obama said in what was billed as a major economic address at Knox College in Galesburg, Ill. “And I am here to say this needs to stop.”

He just got off a huge vacation in Africa, then Friday comes out to stick his nose into the Zimmerman verdict, after dropping the bomb that he was delaying ObamaCare laws for corporations for a year – until the elections — but he charges others have taken their eyes off the economic ball.

Didn’t economic issues have enough sensationalism for Obama’s taste? He must have missed everybody else complaining and talking about the economy all along — which he implied was a non-issue. Now comes the lecture that everyone else has taken their eye off the economy… and the scandals are phony. He takes hypocrisy to a new high.

If there was any take away line from Obama, this could be it:
I’m here today to tell you what you already know — we’re not there yet.”

He came to tell us what we already know! Gee, thanks. You could have saved your breath, everyone’s time, and a whole lot of money by staying in Washington. Maybe giving the lackluster, polished turd speech from there. This is partisan campaigning — not turning his eye to the economy. So turning his eye to the economy is killing the XL pipeline and declaring war on coal? (along with the job killing ObamaCare)

Congress is just getting ready for its recess, so time for Obama to blast away just before shuttling off to Martha’s Vineyard for another bite at the vacation apple. Maybe he can lecture us about the economy from there?

I saw this in a new Factcheck statement:

“Consumer prices have risen a modest 9.9 percent since Obama first took office”

A “modest” increase? Well, if you factor into that that wages in some sectors actually declined — for example in some health related jobs — as much as 5%, then it feels more like a 14.9 % differential.

That is not a good humor pill, and not great that we saw almost a 10% spike in prices. But consider just the gas price increases since he took office. I know it is not 9.9 percent, we could only wish it was that.

Last year, August of 2012, Bloomberg news reported:

The cost of living in the U.S. climbed in August by the most in more than three years, reflecting a surge in fuel costs.

The 0.6 increase in the consumer-price index was the biggest since June 2009 and followed no change in the previous month, the Labor Department reported today in Washington. The median forecast of 85 economists surveyed by Bloomberg News called for an advance of 0.6 percent. The core index, which excludes volatile food and fuel costs, climbed a less-than- projected 0.1 percent for a second month.

As of January 2012, gasoline had an 83% increase and ground beef a 24% increase, since he took office. But Factcheck tells us we just had a “modest” 9.9% CPI increase since ’09. Ground beef prices rose every month from November 2009 to January 2012 – 26 months of price increases. (We had a 30.8% increase in gas prices in 50 days -before July ’09.)

8 comments on “News drought for lamestream, and the price of ground beef

  1. Mrs. AL says:

    And the screwballs in the Legislative Branch are doing what about this mess? They are repealing how many laws to detangle our economy from a bloated, obscene budget? Zippo, of course.

    I added a link to my latest post which partially explains why we are in the mess we are in. But it’s not just the young people. A good percentage of U.S. citizens have their heads placed squarely in their smart phones. Smart phone? Yep. Smart phones, clueless U.S. Citizens.


    • bullright says:

      Mrs AL, same bunch doing the same old, and nothing changes.

      Clueless is right. That percentage: They just keep on___…’don’t draw any conclusions about anything.’


  2. tannngl says:

    Important post. O pulls the wool over everyone’s eyes with his government media and no one knows the truth anymore. Inflation has been rising a lot. Any housewife sees it in the prices of groceries, gasoline.
    Problem is many use food stamps and don’t have to worry…


  3. Davetherave says:

    Excellent article Bull! Is it simply amazing (or done so on purpose) the gov leaves out the price of gas and food in their cost of living numbers/inflation? I’ll run with the part I put in parenthesis.

    Anyone one with a single brain cell knows it cost a hell of a lot more to get by these days since O’Crappola took office. And most of the frigging time all he does about the economy Bull is give speeches. Speech after speech after speech, but does ZERO to help the middle class or those in worse shape. Hum…maybe that’s a good thing in hind sight due to every time he touches our economy things just get worse.

    Barry is in full campaign mode again (if he’s ever not) with the mid-term elections approaching next year. The sheep and bums will suck down his Kool-Aid as usually that will make us all suffer


    • bullright says:

      Dave, you hit it on the head. Lets say he has “the Excrement Touch”. It’s his TET offensive. The economy can’t look good when he’s trying to show the effects of his sequester. But if it looks bad he doesn’t look good. Yea, whatever he touches gets worse and worser.


  4. Really nice post, brotha.

    We can no longer expect the MSM to do any sort of investigative journalism, since so much of it will negatively impact Emperor Obama.
    And we obviously can’t have that…



Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s