Hillary Clinton out pandering to young people saying we need you. And Newt Gingrich’s lecture to stop attacking Obama and Hillary. Make it three with Mitch’s threat to crush Tea Party candidates. (maybe the third is not so odd or surprising, is it?)
Newt, what were you thinking? Wait, I know.
“If we spend the next three years being primarily anti-Hillary, we will virtually guarantee her election,” he said. “To make sure that doesn’t happen, we must stop being the opposition movement.”
How about realizing the failures of both are an issue and largely why there is a good opportunity? Nah, too logical. We need to do both, consistently. I won’t belabor the point, it should be self-explanatory — but apparently not for the brain-child Newt.
Hillary and the young people, those two things should go together like water and oil. The young and cynical voters should want to distance themselves as far as they can from the over-hyped heiress in waiting. Support her, for what? What has Hill done for youth?
“We need you. We need your energy. We need your talents. We need your commitment to participation. We cannot let the millennial generation become a lost generation,” Clinton said at UCLA.
Apparently, Hillary needs the youth as much as Obamacare does.
It’s obvious since Rand Paul talks directly to the younger generation and disintegrating liberty, the heiress sees her chances being threatened. Other than female chromosomes, estrogen, and a piss-poor record, what does she have? (some are not sure about the estrogen) She does prove that she can scandalize and politicize as well as anyone, if that’s a strong suit — not to be confused with a pantsuit.
RightRing | Bullright