The Schizophrenic Presidency

How is it that a man who assumed the office as commander-in-chief be willing to declare the whole nation a battleground, yet be unwilling to do battle anywhere else?

“We are not a red America, we are not a blue America” … no, now we are a black and blue America.

Obama recommends talking abroad. But at home he declares the debate is over that an election and its results answered every question for the next four years.

How is it he calls for diplomacy overseas and practices raw power of political force here?

How can he lecture us to talk with our enemies across the pond, but he can’t speak with critics here?

Why do they apply all these terms about “fighting” and “winning” here, but he does not even want to use the word terrorist outside our borders? He calls his political enemies names and extremists, even terrorists, but not Islamist terrorists’ attacks overseas. But when there is a real terrorist attack here, he calls it “workplace violence”.

They talk about social justice in everything they do, while trying so hard to obfuscate justice in our government, or derail accountability of government officials.

Why do folks who say we must be weaned off the Middle East oil fight tooth and nail to keep us from developing our own resources at home?

Why does a regime advocate guarding and securing borders of foreign countries but pursue the opposite policies at home?

Why is promoting same-sex marriage around the globe a human rights issue, and priority, but promoting traditional marriage in this country considered taboo? Why is there no “defense” for traditional marriage, but never enough laws for defense of same-sex marriage, or LBGTQ agenda?

Why is “over population” a huge problem but illegal immigration and border failure are not.

How can they stand with Palestinians and condemn Israel for human rights abuse, while ignoring the rockets lobbed into Israel? Why do they want to take aid and support for Israel away, while funding Muslim Brotherhood and bringing them into top levels of this government?

Why did a man ashamed of the country want so badly to be president of it? Why does his “change we can believe in” require his changes and our belief?

How is it a man can be charged to secure an defend a country that he does not fully believe in?

2.- a state characterized by the coexistence of contradictory or incompatible elements.

RightRing | Bullright

2 comments on “The Schizophrenic Presidency

  1. drrik says:

    “Are we witnessing right now the most radically, extremely liberal, ideological president of our entire lifetime right here in the United States of America, or are we witnessing the most incompetent president of the United States of America in the history of our lifetimes? You know, it is a difficult question,” he said. “I’ve thought long and hard about it. Here’s the only answer I’ve come up with, and I’m going to quote Secretary Clinton: `What difference does it make?”‘_Bobby Jindal


    • bullright says:

      Yes and yes. He’s right. And we do get so bogged in that question. That’s a wise answer. I’ve tried writing about it and it gets lengthy. As if one is malignant and the other benign. I watched a Sunday show where the Democrat said on the IRS ‘you have not shown willful malice.(malicious intent)’ But is that the whole problem?



Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s