Speaking of Justice

With news of the refusal to prosecute Lois Lerner and anyone at IRS of that scandal, on the heels of Hillary sailing through another hearing with barely so much as a sigh, I think the prospect of real justice now in this country is bleak. I mean justice for politicians or those that abuse their government power, or even abuse of government and power itself.

The very next day I see Obama is seeking to end capital punishment in federal cases. And that the Department of [in]Justice is conducting a review, at his request of course. So the new Loretta Lynch seems to be getting quite a workout.

“There are certain crimes that are so beyond the pale that I understand society’s need to express its outrage,” Obama said. “So I have not traditionally been opposed to the death penalty in theory. But in practice it’s deeply troubling.”

He added, “All of this, I think, has led me to express some very significant reservations.”

Chances are DOJ already made a decision not to prosecute Hillary, or appoint a special prosecutor, regardless of investigation results of Hillary’s servergate, likely citing prosecutorial discretion.

Obama is also cranking up his pressure to move Gitmo detainees to mainland US and close the Guantanamo Bay facility. Talks are ongoing as well with Cuban dictators, who want Guantanamo Bay.

The central theme now, especially in view of all Obama’s scandals, is who DOJ will not prosecute? Those are the priority decisions. Funny though how they managed to prosecute General Petraeus. (they make exceptions)

This after already announcing the release of thousands of prisoners this month for non-violent crimes. He’s taken a hands off approach to illegal alien criminals or enforcing law. He’s already issued an executive order to rewrite immigration law.

On May 8th, “Loretta Lynch Confirmed a Dep of Justice Review of Baltimore Police. They had an investigation in Ferguson, and issued their edicts. But note how many of the looters or rioters have been prosecuted. How many rioter/looters have been prosecuted in Baltimore? On a plus, Feds did refuse a Baltimore bailout, so far. I guess reparations do not apply in some cases.

DOJ is not quick to jump into civil rights cases or terrorism when a white person is the inconvenient victim. They don’t seem fast to condemn or react to police shootings.

After the Oregon shooting, Obama has threatened to take gun control measures. We know how he loves his pen. Eric Holder was held in contempt for failure to cooperate with Congress. How far Lynch will go on that path we can only guess, so far.

Now this month DOJ released statements of turning up their efforts against what they call domestic terrorism threats.

New Obama czar will hunt ‘right-wing’ extremists

Americans seen as possibly more threatening than Islamic jihadists
Published: 10/15/2015 a

Just two weeks after it announced a plan to globalize local police departments through the “Strong Cities Network,” the Obama administration has added a new tool in its fight against “violent extremism.”

A new position within the Justice Department – yet to be filled – will focus on investigating lone-wolf domestic terrorists or “extremists.”

The person who heads this new effort will target extremists who plan mass shootings, hold racist, bigoted or anti-government views or see themselves as “sovereign citizens.”

The new position at the Justice Department, dubbed the “domestic terrorism counsel,” will serve as the main point of contact for U.S. attorney offices nationwide and will identify trends across cases, help shape strategy and “analyze legal gaps that need to be closed,” said Assistant Attorney General John Carlin.

It is not clear what Carlin meant by that statement.

Continue reading: http://www.wnd.com/2015/10/new-obama-czar-will-hunt-right-wing-extremists/

But of course, who are the real terrorist threats in their view? Those who oppose them. The DoJ identified white supremacists as the most violent of  domestic terror groups. They worry that they are not putting enough resources or focus on that terrorism threat.

We had another cop murdered in NYC, which escaped mention or statement from Obama. Now a stunning apology statement from the judge who released him, with his lengthy record, months before the murder.

“I know. I am truly sorry,” Nuñez said sadly when a Post reporter reminded her about the 33-year-old cop’s devastated family.

Well, a little late but its another glaring example of the condition of justice under Obama. Lack of mention about cop shootings by Obama speaks volumes when he rushes to the microphone at any other convenient outrage. He’s still worried about the Crusades.

Or just take the first hand testimony of one who has experienced the selective prosecution persecution from the DOJ.

Bernard Kerik writes in a August op-ed:

“I provide this context for one very important reason: The investigation against me didn’t have anything to do with a U.S. Ambassador and three of his staff members being murdered in Libya. It had nothing to do with leaking classified material to unauthorized recipients; it didn’t involve destruction of evidence or the obstruction of transparency in government by maintaining a secret server on which classified correspondence was communicated. It was about false statements or errors and tax charges, which for anyone else would have been handled civilly.”

But if the DOJ has its sights on doing something, or not doing something, it will not be deterred. Special prosecutor statute:

“Stage Two: The “Independent Counsel” Statute (1977-19991)
As a result of Watergate, in 1977 Congress passed the Ethics in Government Act (EGA) which for the first time defined procedures for the appointment of a special prosecutors. Specifically, the Act provided that upon receiving allegations relating to certain “covered persons”, the Attorney General was required to conduct a preliminary investigation. If the preliminary investigation suggested that further investigation was warranted, the AG was required to petition three judge panel established by the statute and known as the “Special Division,” to appoint an “independent counsel.” Several aspects of the Act require further explanation.”

He does have this DOJ theme going. But Obama is more concerned with lighting the White House in rainbows than with real justice. State of justice in America is contemptible.

15 comments on “Speaking of Justice

  1. Hardnox says:

    My level of disgust with this entire administration grows each and every day. When we think it couldn’t get worse… then it does.

    Liked by 2 people

  2. peppermintfarm says:

    Excellent article Bull on the State of (Injustice) in this country.

    From where I’m sitting there looks to be no justice for the American people (esp. if you’re white) and unless you are a trusted and beloved member or supporter of the Obama Lawless rule, you are deemed a terrorist. Just how many white people do you think will be arrested under this new Czar?

    It sends a chilling message up the spine of every Patriot to speak freely against this administration for that apparently will mean domestic terrorism. Is freedom of speech outlined in the First Amendment over now? Is this another way to abolish the Constitution as he also plans to use his pen to hamper the 2nd Amendment as much as possible. And if he doesn’t do the job, Hillary is going to follow the example of Australia by confiscating guns.

    And what about Special Prosecutors? The last time I witnessed that was when they prosecuted Scooter Libby when they knew all along it was Richard Armitage who spilled the beans on Valerie Plame which was ridiculous on the face of it since she was not undercover,

    There will never be a 3 judge panel to bring forth a special prosecutor for any Dem/Commies since Obama has the deck stacked with liberal/Commie judges who decide in his favor most of the time. If they don’t he just snubs his lawless nose at the court.

    It seems to me it is a no win situation for those of us who want law and order back into the White House and those lawless ones within it.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Bullright says:

      Great comment. I couldn’t add anything to that. When do they admit what they are doing and crack the whip? They’ve been waiting for that. Anything to deplete free speech is right. He’ll carve an exemption out for his homies.

      Yes, Hillary sure will continue and take it to new heights. She has to outdo Barry. Calling her the first black woman prez might tick the Mooch off big time. But she thinks she’s well down the road. Of course anything Barry is supposed to do by law he finds a way out of. You’re right, a prosecutor is about last on his not-do list.

      We’re stuck in a lawless nation, thanks to O and his merry band. He’s proved he could get all these radical Alinsky-ites in government. All Hillzie has to do is hit the gas pedal.

      Liked by 1 person

      • peppermintfarm says:

        Bull, I don’t think they will ever willingly admit to what they are doing as that might even upset some liberals out there. As libs saw those tax increases were not just for us but for them too. They may even feel a sense of danger in his new politics to shut down free speech.

        That’s right he would have to carve out an exemption for the libs but even some libs are poking at him these days. They could run into some big trouble they never imagined.

        Since Hillary was a Commie while O was in diapers I do imagine she will naturally take things to a new level. She is dangerous and very scary. If only more people knew what she really is. As we both know she’ll destroy anyone in her way. I saw the looks she gave some of those repubs during her testimony the other day and I thought to myself, Oh boy, what kind of revenge might she have in store for them. Dick Morris says she never forgets a slight.

        I expect Hill to hit that gas pedal the day she takes her phony oath to our Constitution as she prepares to finish off the work of destroying what O didn’t get done.

        Liked by 2 people

        • the unit says:

          There is a song ‘my pocket has a hole in it.’ I guess a pant suit has a pocket too. So both H and O fiddle through it(their own) to find gratification, not accountability or justice, thinking they fiddle in fiddling tune with Marx, Alinsky, Frank Marshall Davis. And their fiddling aides.

          Liked by 2 people

        • Bullright says:

          I agree, she’s taking names. Her perception is supposed to whisk her into the Oval Office. Then all bets and promises are off. All that matters is the Clintons. We saw under Bubba all the creative ways they use government against their enemies. They’re experts at it. Dare the first person that crosses them.

          Liked by 1 person

          • peppermintfarm says:

            Right you are and there are repubs who have already crossed her and woe be to them. God only knows how she’ll extract her revenge but it won’t be good.


            • Bullright says:

              Well, not to be outdone by Obama I guess she needs her own goon squad too. She has that whole Clintonista shadow government thing she’s had sitting there waiting for her. “Finally!” Or maybe we could call them the Clinton mafiosa. They will be loyal to a fault like all those Dem puppets at the hearing. She says lie and they fall in line. Obama had the giant bus to throw people under, she’ll have a tank and a D-9.

              Liked by 1 person

            • Bullright says:

              She’s coming ….

              Liked by 1 person

            • peppermintfarm says:

              Instead of the Obama gangsta government we’ll have the Clinton gangsta government and I’m sure she will have to top him since there is so much animosity between them.

              She’s not beyond taking any Dem down either. I guess that’s why none of them buck her. Instead they suck up to her Majesty.


  3. peppermintfarm says:

    Perfect picture of the Beast and her destrucion of her so called enemies. lol

    Liked by 1 person

    • Bullright says:

      You’re right, gangsta government. True Dems better be on her side too. They’ll all kiss her ring. Remember Joe Lieberman, the poster boy.. They’ll take out anyone in the way. .Hillary could sell out an ambassador she’ll have no problem with a Dem, since she thinks she owns the Party.

      Liked by 1 person

      • peppermintfarm says:

        Ha, she thinks she owns the party because she has herself dubbed the Queen. And Queens have the right to sever heads over anything they choose. I feel sorry for whoever gets in her way. And if by some magical treat the repubs remain the majority in Congress. Can you imagine what hell they’ll play being her worst enemies? Right after Iran of course.



Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s