Press vetting and NACH

The National Association of Collective Hypocrites has run out now with an army to dig up stories and information on Trump. Amazon CEO, Jeff Bezos told his Washington Post to dig up everything they can find on Trump, “doing articles about every phase of his life.”

From what Bob Woodward admitted to Fox, the Bezos mandate is a political initiative to influence the ballot box. He warns that people must have access to all information about Trump before going into the voting booth. “The New York real estate world is more complex than the CIA,” Woodward says. Complexity is a rationale.

But they unabashedly stomped all over the news on Barack Obama, even on Hillary. Instead of digging and putting information out there, they played a game of wack-a-mole waiting for any critical stories about Obama to surface and then aggressively beat them down, collectively. Rhodes and Gruber both confirmed media’s role.

They outright refused to vett him, dismissing or completely ignoring huge stories like Constitutional qualifications or his birth certificate. They operated under the assumption that we must prove he is not qualified rather than actually vetting him for people to decide. Media either did not want people to know or have fundamental questions about Obama. They wanted everyone on board with their narrative of a historical election — reassuring serfs that all was well in their kingdom. “Complexity” then was their excuse.

Only racists cared about Obama’s history or life. Only racist bigots cared about his qualifications. He tried writing two biographies just to keep people from concentrating on his disturbing history. Obama called people bitter clingers. Then the media buried anything critical of him. Revisionists were in high demand.

Imagine if Ben Franklin were around to see what they did? They abdicated their duty and wanted people to go into the voting booth without critical information about Obama. They wanted people to ignore basic questions and information — the dumber the better. And once elected, they declared the time for questioning was over. They told us the American people elected him. They told us the information was out there but we elected him anyway. They put a an exclamation point at the end of the sentence. “Game over!”

Old Ben would be shocked that the modern press apparatus collectively took a pass to vet or cover Obama with anything near a hint of objectivity. He’d wonder how they could intentionally do that and what their real purpose was for doing it?

So now we have a citizenry fed up with the elite political establishment, but secondly just as fed up with the mainstream media agenda. Oh right, they are one and the same now — another thing Franklin would find fascinating and troubling. That this collective cabal would essentially decide who our president should be and that voters would be putty or pawns in media’s hands.

Now the National Association of Collective Hypocrites pulls out their rule book to say it is their job to dig into every faucet of one’s life and expose all the character flaws of the candidate. Anything short of that would be dereliction of their duty. And they’ll tell us the public demands it and nothing less. We could not shame them into vetting or questioning Obama. They can’t even report on what he has done in office. Instead, like Rhodes claimed, the press are only echo chambers for the administration. But truth about Obama’s agenda could be toxic and even hazardous to the press — thou shalt not be critical of Obama.

RightRing | Bullright

10 comments on “Press vetting and NACH

  1. drrik says:

    I think that they have set themselves on a course in search of seeking relevance. The more they end up being ignored, the more potential money that they may lose.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. peppermintfarm says:

    I like your new acronym for the media and the elites who think they should tell us who is best to vote for, anything except what we want.

    So it is their duty to go after Trump when they saw no duty to go after Obama or Hillary for that matter. They always go after the Republican who is running so it’s now news except they announce they are going to dig up dirt in every corner of the world I imagine.

    All I can see is viewers and readers beware of this lying media.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Bullright says:

      True Pepp, their only loyalty is to their ideology and jobs. To do what they’ve done requires intent, and a lot of it. There is no sense of professionalism about it. Oh, and the end justifies the means every time. (same as pols)

      The joke may be on them. They are losing influence, especially with the internet and social media, which makes them try even harder. Their ability now to step on stories and knock them angers me. They became the defense department for Obama, Hillary and the whole liberal establishment. Truth is not a factor.


      • peppermintfarm says:

        True Bull, their only intent is to bring down whoever the Republican candidate is. They’ve been doing it for years. Remember Dan Rather’s scandal about Bush and his National Guard duty which was all a big lie? They will do and write anything to get the dem/commie voted in because that is there ideology too. They are as stupid as the Bernie voters who don’t seem to know what socialism does to a country. All they’d have to do is look at Venezuela right now which is collapsing under the weight of socialism. I guess they are too dumb to see it.

        Then there was Romney’s taxes which the media all clung to as a ways to bring him down. Then on McCain they tried to say he wasn’t citizen born in Panama.

        Never mind we have no idea where O was born and they did nothing about that. Or his affiliations with radical persons and places. That was “no story” to them.

        I think too the joke will be on them as social media runs the news cycle these days and some nuggets of truth get through. The people are onto the media and hate them as much as the pols. Their cred is GONE!

        Liked by 1 person

        • Bullright says:

          I think you are right on. Now we see them resorting to repetition so much to overcome the other voices. Like progressives, they just don’t have any credibility anymore except to undermine and destroy.

          When public opinion opposes them they are furious. So they resort to attack. But credible objectivity is so far gone they don’t even consider it a virtue.


          • peppermintfarm says:

            Oh yeah, they are furious all right. We didn’t go along with their usual pick. Now they will attack not only Trump but us. They never had any cred and they don’t even know it so far. It’s not dawned on them even as the American people turn their backs on them. They still believe that destroying Trump is going to change our minds.

            Liked by 1 person


Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s