Dems lose on a champagne, caviar budget

One of the strangest, and funniest, things I witnessed was Van Jones prosecuting Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign. Never mind that 8 months later, Dems never had a real autopsy over the death of Hillary’s campaign.

He gave a speech in Chicago with just that subject on the docket.

The Hill — People’s Summit in Chicago.

“The Hillary Clinton campaign did not spend their money on white workers, and they did not spend it on people of color. They spent it on themselves,” Jones told a packed house at McCormick Place in Chicago. “They spent it on themselves, let’s be honest.”

“Let’s be honest,” Jones continued. “They took a billion dollars, a billion dollars, a billion dollars, and set it on fire, and called it a campaign!”

“That wasn’t a campaign. That’s not a campaign.”

Jones continued, attacking the Clinton campaign’s reliance on consultants and polling data that proved to be wrong.

Read more:

It could be the case that she spent more money than anyone in history to not get elected.

Now, despite all the money flowing into the Georgia-6th District, once again their expensive scorched earth strategy ended in ashes, with Ossoff losing by 6 points.

It is not what pundits expected and it wasn’t what Ossoff hoped. And he was beat by a woman…with a real vagina rather than a Planned Parenthoody imposter.

Elections have consequences, for sure….. they empty bank accounts. So while Republicans want to Drain the Swamp, the Democrats just want to drain bank accounts.

6 comments on “Dems lose on a champagne, caviar budget

  1. Peppermint says:

    The most money ever spent on a congressional race and they still lost. Just as bad if not worse than the Hillary campaign and what was spent.

    Well, you can put lipstick on a pig, but it’s still a pig. And Ossoff was a pig in a poke.

    Oh, PP spent 1 million on his campaign. That proves they don’t need government funding from the tax payers when they have money to burn on this bum.

    Ha, ha, a real vagina. Hilarious!

    Liked by 1 person

    • Bullright says:

      Exactly, big spenders. He was a PP darling, Yeah, they got money to burn on campaigns. I cleared that first post because I figured you had trouble and it doubled your comment. .


  2. drrik says:

    Too close.
    Should not have been close, even with all the money.
    Calls to mind significant problems in Georgia. Why is it legal for a person to run as a representative of a place that he doesn’t live?
    Why is it legal for a candidate to be taking money from people other than those that he intends to represent? How can he purport to owe allegiance to those constituents over and above those financiers that subsidized his job?
    I could understand this being par for the course in a corrupted locale like California or New York. I have significantly higher expectations of Georgia.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Bullright says:

      Right Georgia? Their arrogance knows no bounds. Let Media Matters, PP, Hollywood elites, uber-left Move Over machine decide for the people. Disgust.


    • Bullright says:

      Another part of the story is likely that migration of people coming from north into that Atlanta area. (I don’t know the numbers) He carried that area handily. To me it is more like a hostile takeover than an election. And while they are doing it, they are convinced of their success. Still it takes an effort to fend them off. No doubt they’ll keep coming back and asserting their success. (just like Iskamists do)
      “Too close” is the whole enchilada.


  3. […] Dems lose on a champagne, caviar budget […]



Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s