Thou protests too much. Obama trots out the claim his presidency was scandal free.
“I didn’t have scandals, which seems like it shouldn’t be something you brag about,” Obama said, according to Newsweek.
“if you look at the history of the modern presidency, coming out of the modern presidency without anybody going to jail is really good. It’s a big deal.” [and he’s proud — no, instead they got rewarded]
“No one in my White House ever got in trouble for screwing up as long there wasn’t malicious intent behind it,” Obama reportedly told the crowd.
That’s because what he screwed up was the entire country, and we have yet to recover from his tenure of evil. Who knew destroying America was not a scandal?
In fact, most of our problems now were caused directly, if not intentionally, by Obama.
US Attorneys General do not get held in contempt in a scandal-free administration. The IRS doesn’t politically target people in a scandal-free administration. A scandal-free administration, intelligence and DOJ do not start up an investigation of an opponent’s campaign, nor target political opponents by weaponizing government against them.
Even now, his LieBarry (as I call it) is a big scandal. Obama’s truth-challenged legacy.
To believe any of Obama’s claims would “require the willing suspension of disbelief.”
Here’s Obama in search of a scandal-free zone.
Right Ring | Bullright
To have a scandal, you have to have sh!t and you have to have a fan. We have sh!t. But without a fan, there’s no “scandal.”
Here’s something I posted on Facebook a couple days ago:
LikeLiked by 1 person
And having a shitty fan doesn’t count either. Good piece.
We used to say shit only runs down hill, too. I don’t think we can even say that anymore.
That all worked wonderfully for Obama, didn’t it? “nothing to see here, NOPE!”
Well, now people should be careful not to confuse Leftists misuse of the term “scandal’ when it is actually a coup. (helpful reminders for the modern age)
Getting worse it is. And only one side cares. Imaging that?