Who’s Sorry Now?

What an abortionist had to say about deciding to stop after doing them for years.

Live Action (read here)

Besides her pro-abortion philosophy, Aultman gives two other reasons why she became an abortionist:

“I also could make a lot more money doing abortions than I could make working in an emergency room. I enjoyed the technical challenges of the procedure and prided myself on being really good at what I did.”

More: https://www.liveaction.org/news/planned-parenthood-abortionist-ted-bundy/

So give her some credit for changing and stopping. But she did make a lot of money doing it and probably provided her a nice and comfortable lifestyle, until she did.

Then add this:

“I probably murdered more people than Ted Bundy or any of the mass murderers if you consider all the abortions that I did,” she says.

Consider that the abortionist and woman having an abortion may have the same economical motivations for their actions. I just never heard it put in such direct terms before. Well, I find it awfully hard not to make some deductions about that.

This opens a Pandora’s box in philosophical terms. You go to school to study medicine for the purposes of using it to fix people and save lives. Then you go to work using the same knowledge and talent to extinguish lives. How does the latter justify the former?

Should it take three scenarios to sound warning bells that something is wrong with this?

I’m not sure what to think of it all. Chew on that.

Advertisements

New Oil Discovery

Now we’re talking. Let’s see Obama take credit for this, since he can’t block it.

Largest Oil and Gas Reserves Ever Assessed Found in West Texas

Breitbart — by Merrill Hope  —  Dec 7, 2018

The U.S. Department of the Interior announced Thursday the Permian Basin’s Wolfcamp shale and Bone Spring formation spanning parts of West Texas and eastern New Mexico hold the largest potential oil and gas resources ever discovered. Federal surveyors note the Bone Spring plays could offer roughly seven times the amount of oil as the Bakken shale in North Dakota.

In a new assessment, the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) estimated these untapped regions in the Delaware Basin of the Permian contained 46.3 billion barrels of oil, 281 trillion cubic feet of natural gas, and 20 billion barrels of natural gas liquids, more than two times larger than its 2016 assessment of the Wolfcamp shale play in the Permian’s Midland Basin.

“Christmas came a few weeks early this year,” said U.S. Secretary of the Interior Ryan Zinke in a prepared statement. “American strength flows from American energy, and as it turns out, we have a lot of American energy.” Zinke added, “Before this assessment came down, I was bullish on oil and gas production in the United States. …../

More: https://www.breitbart.com/border/2018/12/07/largest-oil-and-gas-reserves-ever-assessed-found-in-west-texas/

If liberals cannot find grounds to condemn the news, then they’ll go out of their way to ignore it. But they won’t be happy because these days all that excites them is doom.

Yet they wonder why we need pipelines and infrastructure development for it. Or they will be back to talking about taking over and socializing oil companies.

I figure the next thing is if Dems can’t find ways to block any good news, or turn it rotten, they’ll try to tax it somehow. It could be called the “good news tax”. I wouldn’t doubt it.

Wailing Waylon

It was in mid-seventies I suppose when I first discovered Waylon Jennings — or he discovered me. Whatever way I stumbled on his music.

Well, I may be off and way out here but to me it gave me the impression of pure and clean and always reminds me of a white Christmas. It had a sort of a righteous dignity about it, to me, that I don’t know where it comes from.

Could be my faulty perception but that stuck with me whenever I hear him grinding away.

So I ran out and bought one of his records one time. Then someone said to me why did you want to buy that? I said listen to it. End of duscussion. Wailing Waylon I called him.

2018 Doctrine of Cultural and Civil Order

…that is, as defined by the left. And they wonder why so many people have problems with this paradigm of perversion propelled across the land by ‘liberaldoom’.

 

Dislike is being criminalized across America as hate; while genuine hatred is encouraged and rewarded for political gain as “tolerance.” Protecting the murder of babies becomes sacred doctrine as ‘law of the land.” One person’s objection removes or abolishes the free speech of masses, as the “social media.” Yet that is just par for their course.

Isaiah 5:20 “Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness, who put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter!” 21Woe to those who are wise in their own eyes and clever in their own sight.” …”23who acquit the guilty for a bribe, and deprive the innocent of justice.”

Social Justice is miscarriage of justice and lawless behavior. Sexual desire of one supersedes any privacy and protections of everyone else under social justice.

Sedition is the highest, respectable form of patriotism. Criminality is rewarded and encouraged; abiding by and respect for the rule of law is hated.

Fair means by any means necessary, to the left. Protecting democracy now means destroying the Constitution. Sanctuary means special rights and privileges for some. Equality means picking winners and losers. “Antifa” is just a license for fascists. Fair means fomenting bias. Racist and racism is anyone who disagrees with the fascist left.

One person’s choice to use any bathroom outweighs everyone else’s privacy and choice in using that bathroom. You will be punished, if not charged, for objecting.

Choice is ratified as no choice for others. Murder is justified as the sacred choice and every official must swear on the altar to preserve it.

Mob rule under ‘pitchfork democracy’ is speaking truth to power. Resistance is conformity. Resisting democracy is saving democracy. Serving the public means being served by the public. Counting votes is cancelling votes or not accepting the vote count.

Investigation or impeachment is a diversion from corruption and treason that shall be honorably protected. Heroes of deceit shall be promoted to the highest level.

Transparency is keeping information from the public, whatever it takes. Only corrupted officials with conflicts of interest have integrity and cannot ever be charged — all others need to be recused from supervisory roles. A coup is now “preserving democracy”.

Dear God, save us from this ‘liberaldoom.’

Right Ring | Bullright

Gaseous Alert: S. Florida Area

Breaking….I have a real news alert. And they wonder why people are outraged.

From the Fox News 13 affiliate:

DANIA BEACH, Fla. (AP) – A Florida woman faces an aggravated assault charge after authorities say she passed gas in line at a dollar store and pulled a knife on a man who complained about it.

Citing a Broward Sheriff’s Office report, the Miami Herald reports 37-year-old Shanetta Yvette Wilson passed gas while waiting in line at a Dollar General Sunday night and upset a nearby customer. The report says the offended customer and Wilson then got into an argument “in reference to the defendant farting loudly.”

It says Wilson then pulled a small folding knife out of her purse and told the victim she was going to “gut” him while moving as if to attack him. Wilson was arrested and charged with aggravated assault with a deadly weapon without intent to kill.

Records show she was given a $2,500 bond.

It’s unclear if she has a lawyer.

Consider yourself informed.  That is “Breaking Wind News” for today.  Good thing, once again, Broward Sheriff’s office was on top of the situation.

We go from passing off mysterious votes to the right to pass gas in public.

Only in Broward county.”…deadly weapon without intent to kill.” And how exactly do they know that? Did they think she was only a damsel-in-distress?

My next question is will this judge have to recuse himself for conflict of interest? Or will it have to be heard out of the area because she cannot get a fair trial in that court?

Maybe, just maybe, this case has gaseous civil right issues that could reach all the way to the Supreme Court? But special precautions will be needed in any courtroom.

No word from discredited Broward Sheriff, Scott Israel, if he stands behind her defense.

 

Dispatcher: “One Adam-12, One Adam-12, see the woman…public disturbance. Farts fired! Repeat, farts fired!…approach with caution. Backup needed!”

I thought the gas passed over midterm elections was bad!  Wow, a $2,500 fart.

 

Okay, Unit….I know it’s coming. It’s your home field. Let it rip! (pardon pun)

Cohen on social media life support

So I’ll take it as my duty to update everyone, since I have written about Christine ‘Brinks’ Ford and her lucrative fundraising activity. You know, that was for personal security reasons she raised 860 thousand dollars. Wink. She finally halted it this week.

That would buy a lot of body guards and security systems, no? Plus all the contributions in free pro bono legal representation. Pro bono means for public good — Ford’s public good.

Keeping up with Go-Fund-me Dems turns out to be a huge challenge. Another one on my radar is Michael Cohen who has set up a GoFundme to support his turncoat act from personal lawyer to lying witness. He has now raised 178k of a 500k goal.

“On July 2, 2018, Michael Cohen declared his independence from Donald Trump and his commitment to tell the truth.

On August 21, Michael Cohen made the decision to take legal responsibility and to continue his commitment to tell the truth.

Michael decided to put his family and his country first. Now Michael needs your financial help.

The Michael Cohen Truth Fund is a transparent trust account, with all donations going to help Michael Cohen and his family as he goes forward on his journey to tell the truth about Donald Trump. ”

Calling it “The Michael Cohen Truth Fund”… wow that sounds like a Lanny Davis original.

It just screams Orwellian to me.

He seems to have a long way to go but the donations are sure to tick up now. But as we know from the past, they don’t have to stop at the goal. Ford blew off her goal. Of course Cohen’s ‘Tell the Truth Fund’ is not trending yet, but he’s just getting started.

After all, I’m sure this “journey to tell the truth” will also include a media tour and probably a lucrative book deal. One needs a lot of incentive to tell the “truth.” Of course to a liar such as him this should come easy.

How come the real truth does not have a million dollar figure then? Just asking. And no one seems to be raising or supporting that project. In fact, everyone is trying to shut that effort to expose the real truth down. Great gig if you can get it though.

So I’m now calling this GoFundme trend ‘the social media life support’ funding all these nefarious Democrat projects and their mouthpieces. It’s the Act Blue of the resistance.

Dear Melania

An open letter to Melania Trump. (not that she’ll ever see it)

It is so nice for the U.S. to have a real First Lady who is not consumed by hatred and bitterness and a fever of anti-American bias.

Yet I went to look at your Twitter account and see it has been infested with comments of hatred and bitterness toward you. How vulgar they are. With everything from who you are to whom you are with, to where you are from or how you speak.

The Left sure shows us who they really are. Even on Tweets about White House Christmas decorations, they bash away at Melania. It is one of the worst displays of disrespect I’ve seen. No media says a thing. But you go forward with a smile and take it all in.

Hold your head high; you are much better than all those vultures combined. They reduce themselves to scavengers trying to erase the moral fabric of America, to replace it with a mobocracy of crazed radicals. You are simply in their way – exposed as what they are.

Sincerely,
An American

Waste No Time 2020

All the chatter has already shifted to the 2020 campaign. That didn’t take long. A Rolodex of names are being floated out of Dems just dreaming to be president. It would be easier to say who is not running. About every Democrat is running.

But before the 2020 race is a thing, could we at least get one thing straight? Pundits and media mention names like Biden, Sherod Brown and some others as “moderates.”

Moderate what? Moderate socialists? Now socialism is an endearing term to Dems .

Quit playing games. Can we all agree there is no such thing as moderate Democrats anymore? Democrats are all progressives now and there are no moderate progressives. Maybe Dems will try to invent them – for the sake of a ruse to confuse some people.

Moderate Dems on the national stage have been extinct since at least 2000. Even before that there were only a few. And those few lived out a dormant existence.

There is no such thing as moderates in the pool of progressives. There may be various levels of progressives at a given time but moderate is not one of them. Can we finally stop pretending they exist? Dems know it and so should we. It is exemplified in pro-life.

Look no further than abortion to see how far they’ve come in a short period. To show this contrast just look at the issue of life. Or in DFLA, Democrats For Life of America.

In 2003 “John Zogby found that 43% of Democrats “agreed with the statement that abortion ‘destroys a human life and is manslaughter.”” Now they have a litmus test that you cannot thrive and survive in the Democrat Party by being pro-life.

That is one of the best indicators of the state of Democats. But you could go issue after issue, to the latest Democrat primaries, only to find that on issue after issue they are progressives with a strong socialistic bent. It is the Marxist consolidation of America. There are many reasons for this homogenized statist affection, with organizing being one of the chief facilitators. Commie organizers are us, now led by Obama.

And in the last decade it has gotten worse. Remember the pro-life guy who pushed for changes in the Affordable Care Act? Bart Stupak is not even a footnote in most places.

(Vice News)“The Democratic Party has never been very welcoming to pro-life Democrats,” said former Michigan Rep. Bart Stupak, the Democrat who led the charge against the Affordable Care Act over abortion restrictions in 2009. “They’re even less warm now, and the relationship has gone south.”

South? Even Stupak understates the real dichotomy. There is no room for pro-life Democrats at the Party table the way there was no room for Mary, Joseph and Jesus in the Inn. We need to stop entertaining all these fantastical hallucinations otherwise.

People must stop pretending there are moderates among national Democrats. The DNC must be laughing their asses off at that whopper. Christians should quit facilitating the notion, too. (but then that’s another big problem) I don’t like the pretend game.

Right Ring | Bullright

Say No More Clickbait

So occasionally, like other people, I have fallen for the clickbait. Sometimes the story is of personal interest or I want need to know their hyped take on it.

Like when they find a deserted ghost ship washed up somewhere you have to click through the 20 or so pages to find out “what happened”.

Well, I have seen enough of them and followed through. I know they are just there to pique your interest. I know all that yet I admit falling for the ‘I have to know’ hook, line and sinker. Once committed, a person flips through to the last page. I get that.

So my main issue is who writes this stuff? Usually, there is a typo in about the second paragraph or it makes me wonder if someone wrote it from a remote island without the luxury of whiteout or a delete button. And who proofreads the copy?

It reads like a 6th grade creative writing class. Then they will repeat the same thing over and over like they really have to drive home the point. No, the point is already sold because it drove me to the story. Now I want to know. You don’t have to keep repeating “…so what happened?” Just tell the story. At least do it with the reader in mind.

I mean you went to all the trouble to lure them to this page, now don’t blow it on error-ridden language and poor delivery to really turn them off.

I am convinced they sub it out to writers who get a commission on typos. The more you have and a person still reads it, the better pay rate you get. Just proofread it, you know, before putting it out on the world wide web as clickbait in thousands of ads on real news stories. Have some respect for the readers is all I’m asking. Don’t insult them.

Either follow some basics or don’t say it at all. If the rest of us can follow basic guidelines, then high profile attention hounds can. Stop repeating the opening line on the 9th and 10th pages. It is monotonous. A newspaper could not do that and neither should they.

And no, I am not the language gestapo and make lots of mistakes too. But come on, all stars of clickbait, what’s the problem? You are obviously making money on it.

Clickbait go home, brush up, or just shut up!

Right Ring | Bullright

Save Ourselves From Regrets

It’s not often that you are just reading an article on Psychology Today and happen to get an idea for a post. But such is my predicament today.,

Never mind how I got there, which in truth would be as good a story. The article was based on and titled after the old Frank Sinatra hit, “I did it my way”. A classic.

The pertinent lyrics are “Regrets? I’ve had a few.” A well-worn familiar line. The obvious point is people usually have some regrets, or more aptly living with them.

Here’s an excerpt:

“Given that not many of us “always do right,” why not concentrate on getting rid of regrets we may already have, and forget about resolving to do differently in the future? Sounds good, but in my experience such a thing is easier said than done. Maybe the only real way to get rid of regret is to go back and correct what we did wrong in the first place. …./

Of course there is no guarantee that a second chance, even if we could get one, would not also be wasted. Human nature being what it is, how likely are we to make the same mistakes over and over again? With age, so they say, comes wisdom. Hindsight is 20/20, and all that. – Psychology Today

This got me thinking about living with regrets. I’d be lying if I said I had none. But as far as erasing them, isn’t that the fool’s gold? Try as we must, unless one is stone cold without conscience, everyone has some regrets lurking here and there. Charlie Daniels explained about do-overs that he concluded he would not change or redo most things, since it could also change the outcome which he is happy with. There you go, one thoughtful approach.

However, lacking a major success like that, it might be hard for some to give the same answer. Some people might like to change the present situation they find ourselves in, if they could. So a change/redo may sound appealing that could repeal their outcome. The “if only(s)” — if only we would have done this or that differently, we’d be in a better situation. Many people know that is just fool’s gold, too. Though we can learn a lesson or two from mistakes so we don’t end up in the same place again.

What struck me was: “why not concentrate on getting rid of regrets we may already have, and forget about resolving to do differently in the future?” Eliminating regret can clear the conscience. If we could only get rid of those regrets. And don’t worry about resolving to do differently. Sound like a psychology answer? Don’t worry about it. And if you were not resolving some change, then what is the point or lesson learned? That could lead you down the “we really have no control” road. (Environment rules)

Regret is real, it can get you down and eat you up. To claim you really have no regrets seems disingenuous to me. I figure everyone must have them. Or like the article implies, we wouldn’t be human. Failed humans at that.

What to do with and about all those regrets is the problem. We could burn effigies of them, symbolically of course. We can just vow not to repeat them again, contrary to the advice above, as a wiser person. But about the only thing we really cannot do is erase them – not without some psychological damage. And who needs more of that, as if the regrets weren’t enough? Instead, we really have no choice but to live with them. But We don’t have to become a slave to them.

Still, the only thing I know of close to erasing the guilt associated with the regrets is real forgiveness. And there is really only one true source for that. Even after that you still have to learn to forgive yourself, which can be the hardest thing. God can forgive us but we have a hard time forgiving ourselves, especially if we are honest. Guilt is something we carry but have difficulties shedding.

At times, people marvel at someone not having the baggage of guilt. A lack of conscience will also do that. In reality, we know we should feel the guilt but how do we deal with and process it? Again, there seems to be no choice left but to live with it.

The secret to that is the same as seeking forgiveness from God. You can also seek help for dealing with the guilt and regrets. It may not be for Psychology Today to tell you about such an option. Having issues has created a cottage industry for them, and one I think they’d like to keep growing – not end. So it goes on at no one’s expense but ours.

Maybe all the psychological treatments can treat some of the symptoms but they could not completely cure a bad case of regrets. Only God can really do that.

Right Ring | Bullright

Hillary In The Rear View Mirror, Again

Terms of Endearment. Onward Together?
“What difference at this point does it make?”

Judicial Watch: Federal Court Orders Hillary Clinton to Answer Additional Email Questions Under Oath

Judicial Watch — NOVEMBER 15, 2018

(Washington, DC) –Judicial Watch announced today that U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan ruled that within 30 days Hillary Clinton must answer under oath two additional questions about her controversial email system.

In 2016, Clinton was required to submit under oath written answers to Judicial Watch’s questions. Clinton objected to and refused to answer questions about the creation of her email system; her decision to use the system despite warnings from State Department cybersecurity officials; and the basis for her claim that the State Department had “90-95%” of her emails.

After a lengthy hearing yesterday Judge Sullivan ruled that Clinton must address two questions that she refused to answer under-oath.

Describe the creation of the clintonemail.com system, including who decided to create the system, the date it was decided to create the system, why it was created, who set it up, and when it became operational.

During your October 22, 2015 appearance before the U.S. House of Representatives Select Committee on Benghazi, you testified that 90 to 95 percent of your emails “were in the State’s system” and “if they wanted to see them, they would certainly have been able to do so.” Identify the basis for this statement, including all facts on which you relied in support of the statement, how and when you became aware of these facts, and, if you were made aware of these facts by or through another person, identify the person who made you aware of these facts.

Judge Sullivan read his opinion from the bench, deciding that the question about the creation of the email system was within the scope of discovery. Judge Sullivan rejected Clinton’s assertion of attorney-client privilege on the question about the emails “in the State’s system.”

The court refused Judicial Watch’s and media’s requests to unseal the deposition videos of Huma Abedin, Cheryl Mills and other Clinton State Department officials. And it upheld Clinton’s objections to answering a question about why she refused to stop using her Blackberry despite warnings from State Department security personnel. Justice Department lawyers for the State Department defended Clinton’s refusal to answer certain questions and argued for the continued secrecy of the deposition videos.

This hearing and court ruling is the latest development in a Judicial Watch Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit about the controversial employment status of Huma Abedin, former deputy chief of staff to Clinton. The lawsuit, which seeks records regarding the authorization for Abedin to engage in outside employment while employed by the Department of State, was reopened because of revelations about the clintonemail.com system (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:13-cv-01363)). The court also granted discovery to Judicial Watch to help determine if and how Clinton’s email system thwarted FOIA.

“A federal court ordered Hillary Clinton to answer more questions about her illicit email system – which is good news,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “It is shameful that Judicial Watch attorneys must continue to battle the State and Justice Departments, which still defend Hillary Clinton, for basic answers to our questions about Clinton’s email misconduct.”

See at: https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-federal-court-ordered-hillary-clinton-to-answer-additional-email-questions-under-oath/

Okay, looks good on it’s face. My conclusion would be the insult this whole thing is to our system of justice. Here we had Clinton commit violations that were far outside the law.

So now because of the fact she did it all under the job title she was in, the government has to come in to defend her actions and explain her egregious conduct. (Excuse my barfing”) It is so outrageous that both the DOJ and Dep of State could be called in to defend her conduct. And of course they have to do it at our taxpayers’ expense, too. A double.

But that is the way this whole thing goes and Hillary knows it. She sewed the seeds of it into the State Dep. She knew and planned this. You have to wonder if this makes State accomplices to her crimes? And if Barry Soetoro is also liable for having allowed it?

Then the last salient point: why do we continually always find about this mostly through Judicial Watch when we had active Congressional investigations, and presumably DOJ investigations as well? Yet here they are in battle for answers some 5-1/2 years later.

No wonder Hillary’s new theme is “Onward Together.” She commits the offenses then drags everyone along, forced to defend her every step of the way. “Togetherness” that way has always been one of endearing benefit to the Clintons.

Word of The Year

Oxford Dictionary has decided that the word of the year is “toxic.” Of course, toxic masculinity gets a minor mention or credit for its use.

Gee, I wonder why that is? But leave it to politics to wear a word out.

Oxford explained it: (excerpt)

“The Oxford Word of the Year is a word or expression that is judged to reflect the ethos, mood, or preoccupations of the passing year, and have lasting potential as a term of cultural significance.

In 2018, toxic added many strings to its poisoned bow becoming an intoxicating descriptor for the year’s most talked about topics. It is the sheer scope of its application, as found by our research, that made toxic the stand-out choice for the Word of the Year title.”

Preoccupation…..that’s the word I was thinking of. Wonder what the preoccupation will be with next year? Obsession may be the better word.

Insecurities of Border Security

A lot has been made about Trump’s use of the word invasion. Let’s consult the Constitution, shall we? See what it has to say.

The Constitution:
Article I; Section 8 (Congress)
15: To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;

Article I; Section 9 (Congress)
“2: The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it.

Article IV; Section 4 (states relations)

The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.

Now given that our own legislature has not risen to the challenge and taken action to protect and secure the border is ignoring their duty. Who is violating their oath?

You can draw all the pertinent conclusions about it you want but I don’t see a problem with the term invasion, which is specifically mentioned in the Constitution.

Of course a borderless, lawless country would have no such worries. So, many Islamists would like to call murder an honor killing, too, but it doesn’t change what it is. Likewise, substituting the word caravan(s) doesn’t change an invasion.

Presidential oath:

“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”

Congressional oath:

“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God.”

See how that works? There is something about the “well and faithfully” part.

Who is lying?

Right Ring | Bullright Trump’s use of the word invasion

Welcome to the empty head club

Where sanity has been abolished. So add another firecracker to out roars against Trump. Now he is to blame for wildfires in California. When will it end? When will it ever end?

A leftover talent from yesteryear speaks out adding his voice to the anti-Trump sentiment.
Wild fires equal wild talk.

ET “Neil Young Slams Trump After Losing Home To California Wildfire

Neil Young wants action on climate change after losing his home to wildfires in California.

As fires in the state rage on, claiming homes and lives, the Canadian singer has written a post on his website slamming Donald Trump for denying climate science.

Read here: https://etcanada.com/news/385851/neil-young-slams-trump-after-losing-home-to-california-wildfire/

 

[Cue the soundtrack:]
Listen my children and you shall hear
The moronic hubris and the fears,
Of pompous jerks and talking heads.

You may not comprehend, at first,
All it portends for us;
But eventually you’ll see
All that is descent and good they flee.
©2018

Check with my agent, I’m sure someone can put a few chords to that.

Funny they can visualize that but can’t see the swamp gas kicking us in the ass.

Tell Me Again….The Way It Goes

Tell me that story again about a county in south Florida, where votes can’t be counted the usual ways. A place that tries our patience on major elections, the way only a child could.

Tell me again, oh wise one, for whom the bell really tolls…. because it never ever tolls for thee. Not in that place, immunized from accountability.

And tell me again, how important it is to count every vote like they are waves on the sea. Tell me again, while they blunder away, how their duties become more important than all the others in the state. Tell me why everything is broken and nothing is ever fixed?

Tell me how this wayward Broward always manages to be the decider in major elections? Do tell me when this election will end? Time will tell, they say, but it never says a peep there. It keeps dragging on and on as if there is no clock or time keeper. Does anyone care?

Tell me again, oh crooked ones, that you are just counting every vote. Funny it never is any other county, just this one making all the stink. You mean the others don’t?

Like sands sifting through the hour glass, these are “the days of our polls.”
We all stand and watch in suspense like drones.

So pardon my disgust at hearing “count every vote”. But how and when they count them never seems to matter. Rules are only for the other guys. Tell me, I’d like to know, how this whole process fits with democracy? Can you give me a hint because I sure don’t know?

Right Ring | Bullright

The Phoniest Show On Earth

I toyed with the idea of what to call Congress with Dems taking over the HOR. I figured it had to have a circus theme. Something like the Crazy Socialist Circus.

Crazy Sideshow Congress. It is coming to town.

You have the guy in the rear corner in a tent trying to blow flames from his nostrils. There is the bizarre boardwalk of the absurd where you don’t know what could happen, or what may reach out to grab and pull you in. Evil is lurking all around like a cocoon.

A man on the back of an old wagon pledges at the top of his lungs that he has the cure to all the ills of our time in his tonic, which is just another snake oil. Buy it or die.

Rides with ponies parade around the room, strutting as if they were Quarter Horses in pre-race warmups. The acrobats come out for their big show nodding to one another as they go off on choreographed stunts that appear perfectly timed.

The house crowd cheers every move. And at every call from the tonic man, they raise their hands for more. Seen enough of the sideshow yet? There’s more, there are freaks galore.

Well, they are just warming up. Everyone seems to agree with everyone else that graces the stage, no matter how bad their acts. There is no hook because they won’t allow it. You are not the audience; you are only the objects of their introspection. You don’t matter.

The gypsies dance, too, as the crowd roars out for more. Careful in your seats that you are not vacuumed in by the ecstasy rolling out in front of you. It’s too crazy to be a dream.

The horror show begins midway and the effects are crafted in charts like a magician’s illusions. They waft up the smoke from behind the stage to breathe fear into your soul that the guy outside the door is nuttier than a fruitcake, who wants to sell you off for pennies on the dollar. But what you have to fear surviving is right in front of your eyes.

The show can go on and on in a loop, repeating the same acts by different characters. All playing their roles in circus town USA. “Come one come all…. you have no choice.” They demand all eyes upon them while they try to suck every dime from your pockets.

You must never be the same or look at things the same, again. Changed and tainted forever, and brainwashed into submission. What all happened? I think you’ll know.

Right Ring | Bullright

Crazy Town

Well, now that was easy.

It is Now Legal to Defecate and Urinate on Denver Sidewalks! What???

Joe the Plumber

Denver just decriminalized public defecation in order to make life easier for immigrants and the homeless.

After decriminalizing defecating on sidewalks, the Chamber of Commerce will probably rename Denver as the “Mile High Pile City.”

No Board of Health? That’s how diseases spread. Now every time I think of Denver I will see visions of poop and other body fluids on the sidewalk. People are required to dispose of dog poop and Denver is letting humans defecate any where they please.

More: https://joeforamerica.com/2017/12/now-legal-defecate-urinate-denver-sidewalks/

No commentary here could suffice. I’ll settle for WTF?

Oh maybe one….sanctuary shit.

Liberal complaints in 4, 3, 2, 1….Never.

Room with a view and Acosta is in it

No word yet from Babs Streisand if Tuesday was considered a win for her, or if she’ll make good on her promise to flee to Canada.

Though you can pretty much doubt anything they tell you because of the Left’s motivation for saying it in the first place.

It is the same way with media spinoids and liars. Always consider their motives. They hate Trump so much they will do or say practically anything to validate their boiling hatred.

What it is they hate so much, I don’t really know? But leave it to someone like Jim Acosta to make a total spectacle of himself in front of a national audience, as intended.

He was so hyper-obsessed by the use of the word invasion that he nearly collapsed under the sheer emotional strain. So it is the use of a term or word that really bugs him.

The same word that is used in the Constitution. (Art I, II, IV) Bad founders. It is something for our government to be concerned about. Not in Jim Acosta’s book. He’s worried about Russia and its subversive actions yet can dismiss a caravan of thousands, and hordes of people, aimed at overwhelming our border as some peace offering to us.

At what point, how many caravans, how many thousands of people, and how many repeated attempts at crossing the border does it take to get serious about it? But someone calls it an “invasion” and he goes into a frenzy.

Then Acosta also relies on their stock talking point, “we are not an enemy of the people”. How is fake news and CNN not an enemy of the people? They defend an invasion and then discount the whole idea of border security as tyranny.

Who do you want controlling the border, really? Should thugs and hordes of people from Latin America, or wherever, control our border and set immigration policy? Have we turned that power of control over to masses of lawless people outside our country?

Who really controls that border, us or them?

But it is just the word “invasion” that really bothers them and rattles their cage.

Or is illegal invasion now a pre-existing condition we have to protect?

Right Ring | Bullright

All Fired Up

Seems like folks are fired up to finish the job. No one can steal that away from us.

Does Pelosi think the people who elected Trump might not vote in this election? Funny.

If the fake news media does not want to be called “the enemy of the people,” then they should stop acting like the enemy of the people.

Sorry, Obama’s economic failures cannot be considered pre-existing conditions.

“The people are coming, the people are coning!”

Everyone should stop appropriating liberal culture because they don’t like it.

Right Ring | Bullright

Most Americans Believe Media Is More Divisive

Poll: Majority of Americans Believe Media Is More Divisive than Trump

Western Journal

By Randy DeSoto
November 2, 2018

A new poll found that Americans believe the news media is more to blame for the nation’s current divisive political climate than President Donald Trump.

Sixty-four percent of respondents to the Politico/Morning Consult survey published on Thursday said the media have done more to divide the country, while 17 percent said they have done more to unite it.

By comparison, 56 percent felt Trump was more of a divider, and 30 percent thought he was more of a uniter.

The sentiments of those responding, unsurprisingly, fell along party lines.

The vast majority of Democrats, 88 percent, as well as 54 percent of independents, found Trump divisive. …/

More at https://www.westernjournal.com/poll-majority-americans-believe-media-divisive-trump/

Where were all these ‘Uniter or Divider’ polls under Obama? MIA. Then, both media and Obama were allied in dividing America along any lines they could. 8 long years of it.

Now Trump is the bad guy? He’s to blame for stuff long before he came to office.

Get you some of that media and CNN. Of course, like Obama, they are intentionally doing it. It is a central part of their national political strategy.