Hypocrisy On Parade

I do not endorse what happened Jan 6th. But there are a few ways to look at it. Had it been a few people who went into the Capitol that day, Dems would have made it about a nefarious half dozen who did it.

Then every one of them, including all their families and distant relatives, would have probably been swooped up in some operation by feds (forget whether Feds had any involvement in it). They still would have made them representative of all Republicans.

It wouldn’t have mattered if the people came in there handing out flowers.

What did Pelosi know, and what did she do? What did Wray do because he did know?

However, the same people on the Left who keep shouting about protecting democracy are the same people who want to defund police, oppose border enforcement, want to empty prisons and shred your rights. They undermine justice for victims.

So a few questions are in order for the perpetually offended democracy defenders. Why don’t they want to remove Capitol police and replace them with a herd of social workers? Why not replace their security details with social workers?

Now if they are worried about democracy, how can they support the crime industry and criminals? Why plot to take our security away? Why encourage lawbreakers? Why would they defend or cater to people whom loot, riot and burn down cities under the guise of protest? Great democracy defenders or warriors with democracy?

Do those things support or destroy democracy?

 

And why would they oppose integrity of the election process? Why would they oppose voter ID laws, and use anti-Constitutional methods to change laws?

Why would they create and pass laws to inflict harm on citizens; to frustrate lives and their livelihoods? Why would they want to nationalize elections, which was forbidden?

Why would they want to block the minority from the legislative process? The same people who claim to defend minorities oppose the minority in the process.

Does attacking free speech further democracy?

But these are people whose pet issue is protecting democracy. Do any of those things threaten democracy? Do those things support of undermine it?

What democracy defenders would want to water down the rights and votes of legal US citizens by opening up borders to lawlessness? Why can’t they enforce the border?

By the way, does lawlessness and corruption support or destroy democracy? Who supports lawlessness in word and deed? Does rigging elections support democracy? Does one-party rule inspire or stifle democracy? Seems like a strange democracy they are defending.

 

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2021

Some Say Treason

In a recent interview, Victor Davis Hanson made a profound comment. He simply said you have to believe America is better than any alternative. If we don’t believe that, we cannot be….. probably won’t be and possibly don’t deserve to be. (I added that last part)

Because if you believe that other countries are just as good, which is moral relativism, you have already ceded the debate and battle. And if you think, in the sense of governing, that other countries are better than us, then you have forfeited the entire paradigm.

“But any fair critic can see the [1776] report’s unifying message is that we are a people blessed with a singular government and history, that self-critique and moral improvement are innate to the American founding and spirit, and that America never had to be perfect to be both good and far better than the alternatives.” — VDH on the 1776 Commission’s Report

Well, is that our objective just to be equal to alternatives to America? I don’t think so. Other countries don’t look at themselves that way. We always hear Bernie Sanders say other counties have a more  advanced healthcare system than ours, that European countries are better on economics with better economic systems, on and on.

How could any sitting US Senator say and, worse still, believe those things? Notice how the Bern is always comparing us and asserting that others are better than us. We just need to be more like them. That sort of gives away his argument.

Imagine for a moment how one of their old, central  arguments frames Socialism and Marxism as a struggle. (it sets the tone of the movement) But in reality he’s already agreed they are better than us. What was the point of America again?

We simply must believe we are better than alternatives, if you do want a struggle at all.

I mean if you don’t believe we are the better than any alternative in the world, then what is the whole point? Why bother doing what we are doing, and what is the purpose of it?

Sadly that is the problem with the left today, they forfeited that principle and lost their belief in this country and in our system. They have already accepted that proposition. Contrary to that principle, they actually reject the idea America is exceptional.

The Most Important Question In The World

The most important question in the world right now is more of a personal question to everyone.  We have Marxism running amuck with no apparent end in sight.

So the real important question then is what you will do about it? And everyone will have to make that decision, at some point. It will be thrust on you. Will you wait until forced to answer or will you try to do something before it gets to that? Which is it?

But answer it we must. To have no answer is the same as condoning it. They interpret that as complicit agreement – or denial, which is the same thing. I could have figured out other ways to say it but the direct approach is best so words cannot be twisted or reinterpreted. We have a problem. What we do about it is what determines our posterity and freedom.

It is that bad already.

Some nay think it surely hasn’t gotten to that point yet or doubtfully will. But I have news for them. What more do you need to see? Do you need to feel the full-blown effects or are you realizing the truth about what we see daily rolling out in front of us? They have telegraphed their plans to us.

I know, we have already been accused of being deniers of science and lots of other names, conspiricists too. However, we watch them declare war on science. Yes, they call it science but they have substituted pseudo-psychology and sophistry for science. None of it is settled as they claim. They make it up as they go. A list should not be that necessary.

What do we know?

The Democrats have no credibility at all.

Everything they do is lie.

They are at war with science and the environment.

They believe narrative replaces facts and proof.

They have vilified and demonized over half the country.

They are determined to control what we think as well as what we say.

They are not loyal to what we know as America.

They are hell-bent on forcing socialism on us first. (that’s only the start)

They want total control of government and institutions of communication.

They will monitor what they don’t have control over.

They want divisions everywhere, even including a race war.

They have assembled an agenda of hate.

They will weaponize everything necessary to achieve their ends:
from information to technology, to means of production and all our resources.

They have no allegiance to our rights, as we know them.

They don’t accept our justice system as originally laid out.

They don’t accept limitations on government, only limitations on the people.

They push a “moral” narrative using any immoral means.

They practice the dark arts of deception in all they do.

They are purging the military and targeting their political enemies.

They will unleash anarchy and crime on us as a means to their ends.

They will seek to destroy anything in the path to their goals.

Government must be subservient to, not the arbiter of, their schemes.

Any of that sound exaggerated? It shouldn’t. It is all in place now rolling out across the country. Elections are not sacred to the sovereign will of the voters. The will of the people is whatever they claim it is. Their narrative replaces truth.

So it comes back to that all-important question, what will you do? The answer is still within the confines of the Constitution. But they have already strategized that battlefield.

What happens when people do not accept their methods and madness? We know one thing they still don’t like and can’t stand: any and all opposition.

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2021

Biden’s Joint Session Redress

Well, was it really Joe Biden’s speech? He was pushing Bernie’s platform. You know, the most progressive (socialist) administration in history. But I will start with the end first, which is where Democrats always start.

Interesting that the first place Biden went after he delivered it was to see Bernice Sanders.

But if Biden’s goal was to make Bernie look good, he sure did. Joe told us about all these big spending ideas with big price tags. Then he says we will pay for it by making the rich pay their fair share. (as if they don’t.)

So to seal the deal, Obiden repeated that no one making less than 400k per year would see an increase in their taxes. Whether that is families or individuals is not clear.

Now remember Bernie debating Hillary in 2016 came right out and said the middle class would see their taxes go up substantially — average +6000 more than their current taxes were then.  And even lower income people too. But he said look at all the benefits they would get in return. So it would be worth it. That was Bernie’s deal.

But Biden did not make that pitch.

Delaware Joe either did not get that memo or forgot that part of the Bernie formula. Of course their taxes will have to be raised, too. Biden is just plain lying. At least Sanders admitted it when confronted about it. (that is common knowledge)

In reality, this wasn’t really a State of the Union or Joint Session Speech. It was a straight out solicitation to buy votes. Only it was not peppered with some flowery rhetoric like Democrats typically do. He just went directly out on the street corner to proposition them.

 

He would not talk about what he is really doing or the platform for it.

He claimed America is back…. to the systemically racist country we always were. Then he promises to build back better. Not a chicken but a racist in every pot.

Create a crisis on the border of historic proportions. Then ignore it completely as a non-issue. Then use it to blackmail the country for an amnesty plan.

Attack and run a court-packing scheme on the Supreme Court. Well, even worse than Obama standing up there attacking SCOTUS in his speech.

Calling half the country racists was classic, claiming they are worse than any present foreign threat. Demonize anyone who did not vote for him.

Killing good paying jobs with the stroke of a pen the first day. Killing jobs, jobs, jobs!

Canceling out political enemies or opposition to himself.

Turn the country into a seething mobocracy and then rant about democracy.

Enact gun control any way possible.

Hike taxes under the guise of the rich paying their fair share.

Take credit for the gains Trump built and vaccines he expedited. Now it is back to the business of crooked politics as usual. Swamp rules will be  in force.

But the vote-buying was uniquely bold and undeniable. He made clear his sole intention is to spend lots of money as the incentive for his purchase. He’s only 100 days in; can he carry on this purchase scheme for 4 years? What does he do when he runs out of money? The gig is up because that is all he knows how to do.

Interesting how he claims no rights are absolute. Then he claimed he is not going against the Constitution but only being reasonable. Now we know his definition of “reasonable.” That becomes the new code word for unconstitutional. Free speech gets the same.

He replaced Russian collaboration on every corner with White Supremacist threats everywhere across America. The citizens are now public enemy number one.

But what we really need is redress from Biden and the socialist Left.

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2021

In-fra-structure

That sounds like some Greek fraternity. In reality, infrastructure as most people think it is pretty basic but does not include things like cross-gender studies or transgender education. Infrastructure is as infrastructure does. 

Only in Washington could they take something that is bipartisan and obvious and turn it into a hole to pour money into.

Both Democrats and Republicans have now put out a plan to address infrastructure. But Democrats seem to think it is anything they want.

Big spending has become a sacrosanct political opportunity.

My simple theorem is that the more big-spending they do the more lying and opportunities for it there are. It becomes an assault on truth.

I listened to some callers on Cspan about what is needed in their states relating to infrastructure. They varied but clearly the people interpret infrastructure as roads, bridges, electric grid, water and large projects related to basic needs. Liberals need to redefine terms as they go.

Can’t we, for once, stick to standard or traditional definitions? For instance, school lunches and changing diapers are not infrastructure. (and I don’t care how big a load an 8-month-old puts out daily.) Gender transitioning is not basic infrastructure.

Years ago I envisioned a truth in legislation act, which basically said bills should have to tell the truth about what it does. It has only gotten worse since then. Titles especially should reflect that notion. That definitely would not include re-imagined and redefined terms to suit ideology. Changing terms changes the purpose and intention. It ends up meaning anything.

Now Republicans have a bill focused on only real infrastructure. It has pay-fors in it instead of a blank big-spending bill. We’ll see where it goes. But there are no bridges to re-imagined terms in that one.

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2021

AOC Spew Alert

Only from down under can we get truth expositions like this on our current politics. 

No, AOC, it’s a Socialism Crisis we’re having …gut check!

At least there are still these Ron DeSantis remarks from 2018 that hold up amazingly well to AOC’s force–field.

“Socialism and ignorance is a toxic combination.”

Throwing Down The Gauntlet

In most major stories there is usually the good guys and the bad guys. Sometimes it is hard to tell which is which. In the past, things were simpler where those lines seemed clearly drawn. Not so now.

Today it feels more muddled and not just in the movies, where Hollywood likes to push those limitations to the max. Even intentionally confusing.

This is especially the case today in law enforcement. But still if you really look at the facts and examine it, you can tell which is which. Those lines are furthered blurred when you cannot give the benefit of doubt to one side.

So its possible you can have the old good cop bad cop routine. You can also have a good cop doing something nefarious, which doesn’t make sense. You could have a bad cop trying to do something that appears righteous, using unconventional means. Or you could have the bad cop doing the same acts that corrupt the system.

You could have a good cop not doing what he needs to do intervening. A good cop could be prevented from doing what is the right thing. Restrictions could make the right thing impossible. You have all these different scenarios outside the normal boundaries of law enforcement. But you also have cops themselves making judgments on right or wrong, with a potential for error.

Why say all this and point out these nuances? Because they become possibilities when it is not obvious who the good guy is in a situation. So it can be, or seem to be, confusing. I think people like clearer lines.

Put on top of that that we usually don’t get those kind of mitigating or condemning factors from press reports. It looks confusing at first glance.

That confusion is where a lot of things can happen, like public perception or outrage or where narratives form. Good can seem bad and bad can seem good. Wrong can be replaced by righteous motive. Right can be clouded by appearance of conspiracy. Right can be condemned for the wrong reasons.

We are human and make these judgments based on what we see and what we know at the time — which often matters. Our judgments are not prefect either. The facts can make it hard to decipher who is right or wrong?

The same thing plays out in politics. Who is right or, if both are wrong, who has the higher ground? Granted these are complex judgments but we are capable of making them, as long as we have the facts and evidence. But when we don’t have those, it makes it almost impossible to make correct conclusions. So a lot of things can hang out in the “I just don’t know” category. Those await more information for us to make those calls.

We can say it doesn’t look good or it doesn’t look bad on our first impressions, yet we just don’t know. Pending. A lot of things are pending where the jury is still out, as they say. Maybe that is a good place to be, or maybe that is not necessarily good. It all depends.

Why go through this rationale at all? Because at some point it matters in a lot of instances. Sometimes it is important and sort of requires fast conclusions where we are not able to render one. Sometimes it is important to take considerable time in making it. Thus, the rush to judgment.

Long for the days when you watched a movie when it was very obvious who was the good guy and who was the bad guy. It seemed to make things simpler. But it doesn’t seem that way today.

When you combine this with systemic problems in systems, it muddies those waters further. When there is corruption on the scale we’ve seen recently, it raises the complexity of a judgment call. While we still know that some things are obviously wrong, they are deliberately shrouded in a systemic pool of corruption to determine who is really at fault.

Remember the old line from Germans that they were only following orders. As if all these things were not enough, put on top of that historical precedents like corruption that never happened before. (never seen) Historical, unprecedented failures and corruption.

You have to use all this to preface the situation we are now in. Sure, we can have an election and get the result that some nefarious people/groups want, for their own purposes, but that doesn’t make it right or legit. It cannot legitimize the process.

Sure, we can have an investigation in search of a justification for the investigation. Sure, we can do an impeachment over things that are normal or legal to do, just because we are determined to have an impeachment.

Sure, we can fail to get answers to things, which were done collectively through the power of state, where no one can seem to be held responsible. Sure, we can have major failures of trust in our institutions then turn around to bestow more power on them, after they thoroughly abused their authority. But who is to stop these things from happening; who will prevent them?

So we can count on courts, those arbiters of the facts. But they are not always given the whole truth. What happens then? We can have faulty outcomes from those entrusted to be the guardrails for law and order.

At some point, we the people have to make our own judgments about all these things, and the consequences, but that process can get very messy. And the mileage varies.

It can get even messier when self-government is stood on its head. We were designed as a republic (if you can keep it) but are leaning toward mob rule – and not necessary a democratic mob. That is a mob which, at its heart, does not care about majority; doesn’t care who is right, doesn’t even care about the rules. It is entirely demand-based. It wants what it wants and it wants it now. It doesn’t care about deliberative, due process. It only wants to be satisfied, which by nature it can never be. It will always be wanting.

How is it that we the people have to deal with all these things and yet are expected to make the right decisions and judgments on everything? We are the guardians expected to keep that republic, but can we when its obstruction prevents that from happening?

We the people need to make some serious, life-affecting decisions. Can we save what is rightfully ours to save? Can we be depended on, by future posterity, to do the right thing given all these circumstances?

May God grant us the wisdom necessary.

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2021

It’s Wray Time Again

Just a few comments on the hearings with FBI Director Chris Wray.

At one point he said the FBI focuses on the violence not the particular ideology or motivations. He repeated that doctrine a few times.

So why does he make an intentional point of always mentioning white supremacists and right-wing extremists as a number one threat? Seems like that is all he cares about.

On two occasions, by Cruz and Blackburn, Chris Wray was asked about the threat information they had prior to Jan 6th, and who called for the National Guard or didn’t? He was reluctant to answer but did admit that a “local authority,” meaning mayor, declined or didn’t want the guard activated.

So if he is investigating this January 6th event, in the numbers he is saying, then wouldn’t he also establish the chain of who didn’t or refused to call the Guard? But he acts like he doesn’t really know such an important detail about the defense of the capitol. How could you investigate without knowing that?

Asked about the death of the Capitol officer, he did not know the cause or details of cause of death. Why not? And why were they telling us he was hit or beaten with a fire extinguisher? Suddenly he is now Sgt. Schultz and knows nothing.

About stonewalling Congress or not answering specific questions over the last four years, he has no answer. Then he is asked about FBI’s referrals or actions taken against anyone from the Horowitz report. His answer is that along came the Durham investigation which caused FBI to pause any disciplinary action in the matters. We must wait.

Chris Wray has proved himself just as competent as Comey and McCabe were. But he can tell you he made two significant minority appointments among 6 top-floor department heads.One Asian and one black. That’s a relief to know.

As to who knew what when at the Capitol, who can really know? Come on, man!

I don’t know why this would belong here but…..

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2021

Joe’s Anti-American Agenda

So besides wrecking the national economy, or removing everything Trump has done, what else does Biden plan on doing to this country? Here are a couple mentions.

Well, start with two major ones. The first is his US Citizenship Act, a bill he sent over to Congress to pass, which includes all the worst ideas for illegal immigration and national security. Here’s a teaser:

“NO-BAN Act
The bill incorporates the provisions of the National-Origin Based Anti Discrimination Act for Nonimmigrants (NO-BAN) Act. This would prevent a future administration from imposing a ban like the one imposed by Donald Trump in Executive Order 13769, popularly labeled as the “Muslim Ban”.”

The second is propelled through his domestic policy czar, Susan Rice, so Joe doesn’t have to say it. That is Rice’s absolutely hideous obsession with gun control. Comments about gun control priorities are in almost every second tweet, between favorite equity mentions.

Oh and they shut down that EO by Trump to hold radical Sanctuary Cities accountable for their lawless agenda. They must have giggled over extinguishing that one.

All in all, their agenda is designed to make America less safe and less secure. Next up, their anti-police policies. Team Joe is installing an investigative agency/committee at the border to investigate complaints, from illegals, about border or law enforcement treatment etc..

King George had nothing on Joe.

Along with destroying any dissent, which is always still job one.

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2021

Nightmares In Déjà vu

There is something to be said about nightmares. Sometimes the worst ones come back. And those are the ones you vividly remember, too. Sometimes you wish you could forget them but you cannot. You wonder where they came from or what spawned them?

So the Obama-Biden years were like a nightmare. It was one of the worst that went on way too long. A dark period many had said was inevitably bound to lead back to common sense virtues. Eventually people would reject it all as leaders would mount an opposition. A good thing in the end. It didn’t work that way.

Now I feel like those nightmares are being injected back into my consciousness. They are back with only slight changes. The characters, some original and others replaced, in that same central theme. This time more determined with more fear than even before. This time with more concentration. They’ve broken through reality and taken up permanent residency in my consciousness.

For instance, one media pundit was a little sad saying Joe Biden probably will not have a honeymoon as president. Ah that is a pity. But the guy was in office for 47 years. He had a half-century-long honeymoon. And he enriched himself quite well along the way. The last thing he deserves is a honeymoon. But us?

Instead, we the people do not get a honeymoon. We do not get a break from anything. We are thrust right back into the nightmares of the Obama years. This time they want to torture everyone into submission. Think that is a bit exaggerated?

In only two days, Biden and company have already declared war on (our) culture, energy, rule of law, security, the economy, values, climate, the Constitution, rights. courts, any opposition, the election system, business, family, history, education or choice, our way of life, America’s sovereignty, border security, and the country itself. They declared war on the first, second, fourth, fifth, ninth, tenth, and fourteenth amendments. More to follow.

And all that is just the beginning with China and it’s total dominance breathing down America’s near future. Submission to Demcrats’ twisted and failed ideology is only a stepping-stone to the Chinese CCP threat looming.

But even all that is not enough. Biden and Democrats demand a non-stop gloat-fest from media for everything they are doing. So they are getting it.

And the last four years?

Just forget all that; abolish it from your memory. Make the current conditions so bad one is forced to forget the Trump years. Forget the possibilities, the hope, the hard and slow change we made from their 8-year abyss. But our nightmares are back with vengeance.

Back to the future.

It has its groups and cancel culture as enforcers. Step out of line now and you will be permanently penalized. Do you want that? Of course not. It has what even Obama never had: the full, unified force of proxy enforcers to carry out their will.

We the people are apparently the only ones who have not bought into all the crazy notions, none of which Joe talked about during the campaign. Now they come out of the woodwork.

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2021

Opposition Party

We are going to need to build an opposition party, complete with a rapid response force. Of course, meaning strictly political. It must be done in weeks not months.

We know we cannot rely on media at all. Conservatives need a force capable of making the case for ideas and for the right. But it cannot get down in the weeds either because we don’t have a lot of time, and the message won’t be successful. No one is going to give us time to make an exhaustive case.

I only propose it because we have not been in that position for a few years. There is a difference in fighting as an opposition party. Those Republicans allied with Democrats will come to the surface fast.

I already heard the left media’s narrative how Mitch McConnell is planning on “crushing” any far right in 2022 by primarying them. Now we are back to establishment politics and their kingmaker paradigm. Mitch got reelected and immediately assumes he will decide who our candidates are. (Déjà vu)

So we need to be in opposition mode not just against the left and the coming socialism wave but also against the establishment within. (they never spoke for our party) The second will be as tough as the first. There is no doubt we must morph into an effective opposition party. I don’t see any other way. What we were doing before will not be enough.

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2021

Cleansing Agenda Of The Left

Now that I see what I see, I conclude if Joe Biden lost and Trump won, this riot at the Capitol would look like child’s play. They didn’t board up cities and businesses from Trump people. It was the crazed left, who couldn’t deal with reality for 4 years, who ripped the country apart. Democrats would be standing in the middle of it, if not organizing violence.

Maybe it would look like a hurricane in different places all at once, going on for days. It is their way. In fact, the case can now be made that part of the reason for the election results, besides fraud, was because some people were afraid what the Left would do if Trump won.

The Left had stoked up those fears for months and months.There is no doubt about it. Chief Justice Roberts mentioned riots in considering any election disputes.

Sunday Marco Rubio referred to the Capitol riot telling Maria Bartiromo he could not think of a better talking point for China than the violence. But no, Marco, I can think of a better talking point for China: what Congress is doing now with snap Impeachment and purge schemes of members of Congress. (Also Senators)

Secondly, the Big Tech take down of a President and people on Twitter with a take down of Parler. With more bans by the hour. Yes that is a better talking point for China and the CCP. Much better. It makes it harder for us to criticize their dissent crackdown.

In fact, you have to admit it is hard to complain about China stomping down protests of political opponents or to complain about Hong Kong and freedom after this massive crackdown. They smear all Republicans and Trump supporters as responsible.

Look at the names they have already labeled them. Insurrectionists, domestic terrorists.Biden even called them Anti-Semites and white supremacists. Gee, remember when we called people thugs? They said that was a racist dog whistle? Calling the radical rioters “a mob” in the summer was racist language. Their protests were democratic.

Actually, that is the point. They have been calling us every name under the book with racists for four years. We were treated as some kind of animals. When actually it was the left acting on instinct like animals rioting on command, spontaneously. They cannot bury all that. But Michelle Obama said in a written statement:

Seeing the gulf between the responses to yesterday’s riot and this summer’s peaceful protests and the larger movement for racial justice is so painful. It hurts. I cannot think about moving on or turning the page until we reckon with the reality of what we saw yesterday.”

After diverting from Obama and Biden blame, they reversed to their true Left form. Pursuing that same 4-year coup. Since the 2020 campaign, they lectured that one cannot attack or criticize political opponents or one’s predecessors. They used it as the pretense for last impeachment. No accusations or stories can spread like they banned the NY Post.

No, this episode at the Capitol was not a coup like the Left is calling it. The coup was over the last five years. Democrats used every asset or means available.

Now it is all about attacking their political opponents. And they are casting a wide net on Congressman, Senators, anyone on the right, all their political opponents. Open season and fair game on all. Democrats in Congress think they have the power to remove Republicans, and run them out of Washington. Use this to go after their political opponents.

All incorporated into their cleansing and purging campaign. Every political opponent they deem a problem, they want to use the opportunity to remove and destroy them. It is being amped up even higher by mainstream media. And then it is us. But who is doing all the purging? Radical Left anti-speech goon squads. Cancel and deplatform people too.

Abc News had this op-ed saying exactly what was on the docket of the Left. You see the problem is not just Trump, it is all of us on right, those who supported President Trump. This article ran after Wednesday.

[Tweet] Trump will be an ex-president in 13 days. The fact is that getting rid of Trump is the easy part. Cleansing the movement he commands is going to be something else. — Rick Klein Twitter @ABCJanuary 7, 2021

He later deleted that Tweet but here was his article it referred to.

“Even aside from impeachment and 25th Amendment talk, Trump will be an ex-president in 13 days. The fact is that getting rid of Trump is the easy part,”

“Cleansing the movement he commands, or getting rid of what he represents to so many Americans, is going to be something else.” — says Rick Klein.

So let the cleansing begin, visions of Hitler dancing in their brains. Glee.
Kyle Herrig, president of the group Accountable.US said :

“The officials immediately responsible for the administration’s harm should not be applauded for handing in their two weeks’ notice just days before President Trump’s term is up — nor should they be able to seek refuge in corporate boardrooms and universities after Inauguration Day. These officials should instead be recognized for what they are: responsible for and complicit in immeasurable suffering.

Former CIA director and venomous Trump critic, John Brennan:

Jan 9, 2020 – “Anyone now seeking national redemption by claiming to no longer support Trump must acknowledge how wrong it was to ignore & enable his corrupt, dishonest, & divisive agenda. Total denunciation of a despot’s legacy is necessary to eradicate any remaining malignancy.”

Jan 6, 2020 – “Every politician, government official, journalist, & talk show host who has ignored & enabled Trump’s lies & corruption bears responsibility for the damage he has wrought. Spare us the excuses. You failed the test of citizenship. It is now up to you to try to redeem yourselves.”

Michelle Obama said before Trump’s Twitter was shut down.

“The day was a fulfillment of the wishes of an infantile and unpatriotic president who can’t handle the truth of his own failures. And the wreckage lays at the feet of a party and media apparatus that gleefully cheered him on, knowing full well the possibility of consequences like these,” Obama wrote.

“Now is the time for Silicon Valley companies to stop enabling this monstrous behavior—and go even further than they have already by permanently banning this man from their platforms and putting in place policies to prevent their technology from being used by the nation’s leaders to fuel insurrection.”

Michelle also wrote, in her thoughts:

“…that together [Warnock and Ossoff] they’ll help give control of Congress back to the only party that’s shown that it can put our democracy above its own short-term political fortunes.”

Really? A party that puts politics above everything, who did not even recognize the results of the last election for four years, who openly said they were in resistance and ran the coup. A wonderful party of sedition and treason. That party?

Senator Jon Tester: @SenatorTester

I have damn little respect for people who wrap themselves in the flag and then try to burn this country down. — Jan 8

You need to visit Portland and Seattle. Then talk to a few of your sympathizing colleagues. They’ll sure appreciate your sentiments. Well, I saw a country in flames all summer long.

Just in, a Cumulus Media memo says they’ll crack down on hosts, possibly banning, for using fraud rhetoric or arguing with election results. Where were they four years ago?

Top Wall Street banks are putting a stop on political donations after violence at the Capitol. It’s probably until spring. Ah, just in time for Joe. PGA says it will pull its championship from the Trump Bedminister, NJ course in 2022.

Did we ever see a fallout or repercussions to Democrats for fueling resistance and sedition? I’m pretty sure they made money on the exchange. Have they issued any statements?

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2021

Chamber Of Violence

I feel like I am in some kind of echo chamber. On the right, we have been calling out the violence and rioting for months, even years. It is the Left, at every turn, who have failed in calling out never-ending violence. Joe Biden himself waited 5 months to even marginally criticize violence, in a very opaque and squishy way. He certainly did not call it what it was. The summer of sedition was a classic example.

Once again, I condemn the acts of violence that took place in the Capitol. It shouldn’t have happened and took place at the worst of times. Stories are that there was some infiltration of bad actors though I don’t know exactly. It was a partially frenzied crowd.

It is probably surmised by those who know me that at times I monitor CNN, for good reason. Someone needs to. So I have infuriated myself sometimes by perusing mainstream media’s caustic content. I would call it some of the most volatile I have witnessed and a cocktail of sedition and stupidity. (Fluctuating shares) Others have exposed it as well.

So it comes to my surprise when they suddenly switch their rhetoric to calling the riot at the Capitol “insurrection.” And then labeling it the “Trump insurrection.” Nothing could be further from the truth. But as usual, the Left will stick to its narrative. They love volatile rhetoric except when talking about their own.

Surely, this has created a stain on the legacy of Trump. Or they want it to. Either way, it is more of a problem. But once again it can be used and weaponized, unfairly, against the entire movement. Only time will rectify this smear.

However, already authorities arrested over 60 people involved. Many more arrests are promised. But I don’t remember all the arrests in the violence over months and months. I do recall the left funding it and setting up bail accounts to assist perpetrators of revolution. But the Leftist media never complained about the culpability, aid and comfort from the Democrats, or against who were responsible. Who is siding with violence?

Instead, the Left’s knee-jerk reaction is to go straight to condemning Trump for violence. No such connections have been officially made to Democrats and their rhetoric.

And right on cue, they draw up another impeachment scheme. Nancy tried to force Pence to employ the 25th amendment. What is this about – other than their removal schemes? One is to force Trump to concede the election. The second goal is to prevent him from coming back or running in the future.

Both of which may now be tarnished by the violence that occurred. But it would not be if it were the Left. Remember Schumer screaming at the Supreme Court, to Kavanaugh and Gorsuch particularly, that they will pay the price after elections.  A direct threat to members of the Court. All of that was passed off, just as he berated two patrons at an exclusive restaurant in NYC. All of it dismissed as nothing. Chuck is “from Brooklyn.”

I am grieved for deaths that occurred at the Capitol; What exactly happened is still to be known. It disrupted the objection process. But I cannot forget and still follow the violent rhetoric on the left, with its direct correlations between Dems and thugs of sedition.

Though, as usual, Democrats are flirting with disaster once again. They seem unaware how this is used against the country, or they really don’t care. They are quite content in always smearing our country, its people, and democracy as well, all for their own political benefit. Another circumstance to use for political gain. Weaponize and attack, mercilessly.

Condemning it? That is not the problem. We still have fake news.

On the right, conservatives and Republicans know enough about it that we don’t support violence. On the left they do. They excuse, deny, encourage, or even endorse it outright. And the threats are made frequently. Have they condemned the violence and rhetoric against Republicans or Trump allies on their homes and families? Crickets.

Did you notice an absence of usual counter-protestors or Antifa in their garb? Curious.
Peaceful transition of power, peaceful transition of power” — after a 4-year coup?

They boarded up stores and cities around the election not from Trump supporters.

Four years of organizing, plotting, scheming, even courting violence…. Democrats.
Stirring up sedition, along with fueling a coup, was the whole point of their game.

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2021

Wonders Of A Coup Never Cease

Wonders never cease. Four years later, the professional liars continue their charade.

Lindsey Graham held hearings with Comey and now the infamous McCabe testifies.

McCabe announced he was the target of a wrongful biased investigation, which resulted in his termination. He said he is seeking recourse through the courts.

I’ll be danged. McCabe a victim of bias? Wow. And what recourse do his victims or Donald Trump have for what was done? What court does Trump go to for remedy of treatment?

So this is what a career professional, lying snake looks and acts like.

McCabe was “wrongfully fired and did nothing wrong,” he told Sen. Blackburn. A “deeply unfair and flawed investigation,” he called it.

He also admitted that it was an investigation on the Trump campaign.

Dianne Feinstein said “it’s time to turn the page on Crossfire Hurricane”…i.e from the whole 2016 election cabal. Well, I’ll be danged, again.

She means from that page they turned into a coup, a special counsel jihad and smears against a sitting president. The page that undermined a president and targeted candidate Trump. That tome…. radical Democrats conspired and eagerly wrote with Deep State.

That tome also later parlayed with an impeachment hoax show trial.

But at the bottom of all this cabal was also the treatment of Gen. Flynn. McCabe admitted pursuing a counterintelligence investigation – based on whatever lies and false premises they deemed fit – and then denied the Logan Act was any factor in it.

However, that is exactly what was driving the entire agenda, for what they claim was appropriate treatment. It was a stealth Logan Act case they were pursuing against Flynn.

McCabe requires the willing suspension of disbelief. (words Hillary was fond of)
To quote Bill Clinton, “this whole thing is the biggest fairy tale I’ve ever seen!”

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2020

Supreme Sacrifice

Any 9th grade education should tell you that there are three branches of government. Normally thought that the Judicial is the weaker of the three. But you would know that.

What is happening now that Supreme Court packing is on the docket of the Left is a bit of a controversy for Biden. He won’t tell us whether he would pack the court or not but instead insists we go out and vote. Then he added that his decision may be released at some point though it would depend on what the Republicans do.

He added to that promising something before election day. Who knows what it is? But then he updated it in an interview. Now he says he would assemble a panel of bipartisan “scholars” and give them 180 days to come up with a reform package. (6 months) If you think that is cover for packing the Court, you are right.

However, if you have three branches with a separation of powers, then restructuring and modifying courts is essentially Congress and the president running roughshod over the Judicial branch. Actually that would be usurping or overstepping the Judicial branch’s powers. But of course Democrats will rationalize it six ways to Sunday.

Supreme Court Packing may be just a part of the whole package. Now if you thought of Biden as a moderate, well that ‘middle of the road’ Joe just isn’t so.

Couple that with the rest of Biden’s other plans. As he politicized COVID_19, Biden is also dreaming of all kinds of government expansion that would rival or even dwarf FDR. Don’t just take my word for it but Biden’s own in an article from New York Mag:

While it’s impossible to tell where the country is headed, Biden’s camp is in the disorienting position of scaling up its laundry list of proposals to match the ambition, and the political appetite, he thinks the American people — desperate for relief — will have in January.

“I think people are realizing, ‘My Lord, look at what is possible,’ looking at the institutional changes we can make, without us becoming a ‘socialist country’ or any of that malarkey.”

So Biden is planning on busting a move on big government. And as the article suggests, it may be flying under the radar. All conceived from his basement bunker. Move over FDR, there is a new central planner in town. Supreme packing is only the beginning.

Right Ring | Bullright

Dems Want A Doormat, Not A President

Democrats don’t want to elect a president; they want to elect a doormat. There is a little bit of a misconception that Democrats want a strong executive for a president.

But no they don’t. They want a suit in the office and a doormat to the White House. They want someone who the mob can demand what they want to, and have him deliver on their every whim. He or she can then rule with an iron fist on behalf of the mob.

The other misconception is Democrats want someone empathetic. They don’t want someone to feel their pain; they want someone to heal their every pain. They don’t care whether the president feels for them as long as he/she performs on the mob’s command.

Besides, “feeling your pain” is a bit condescending, isn’t it? What is that worth?

Democrats don’t want democracy either. They want mob rule. That is as long as they control the mob and it operates in their favor.

Other than that, a president can issue a lofty, Obamaesque speech occasionally to make them feel good. But what he does for them is much more important. And they are a demanding bunch of intolerant brats, with a wish list longer than War And Peace.

Joe Biden delivered an address to Democrats adding a quip about his father saying:

“My dad used to say, “Joey, I don’t expect the government to solve my problems—but I sure expect them to understand it.””

Understand it? That’s about the last thing it seemed capable of under Obama-Biden.
Now let me loosely revise that into a simple theorem of my own.

I don’t expect government to solve my problems….. But I don’t want them to get in my way and keep me down there, or cause me more problems.

I do expect government is incapable of feeling my pains when I have them. But I just don’t want it to cause the pain. And I certainly don’t need it to extort my problems.

But when government does cause me problems and pain, I have a First Amendment right that says I can spell out that problem.

So Joey is trying to create a code to live and govern by. Well, he is a little late. We see the kind of code he and Obama operated by over the years. His family is enriched by his “public service.” Public office is a self-serving position, to him, not a selfless service.

Do you think his dad always told him that? Or did his father tell him that other people’s pains and losses are just a political opportunity for him and other elected pols to extort? That a crisis is an excellent opportunity to abuse political power.

Where did those values come from, Joey? And what oath of office mentions those?

Don’t you always love getting lectured about “values” from Democrats when they prove they really have none? They do their moral preening but then take advantage of every problem or crisis, even when creating it themselves, for pure political gain. Then rub your face in it. This skill is what they are really good at – turning your pain into their gain.

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2020

Enemy Within, Game On

Ilhan Omar Calls for the Dismantling of the US economy, political system.

William Davis | July o7, 2020  Daily Caller

Democratic Minnesota Rep. Ilhan Omar called for the “dismantling” of the U.S. economy and political system Tuesday.

“As long as our economy and political systems prioritize profit without considering who is profiting, who is being shut out, we will perpetuate this inequality,” Omar said. “We cannot stop at criminal justice system. We must begin the work of dismantling the whole system of oppression wherever we find it.”

Omar held an event Tuesday in her home state of Minnesota with members of the Minnesota People of Color and Indigenous Caucus. Omar tweeted earlier Tuesday that the purpose of the event was to address “racism in policing” in the aftermath of George Floyd’s death..

Omar has joined calls from local Democratic leaders to defund the police after four Minneapolis police officers were fired and charged in connection to Floyd’s death. The Minneapolis City Council unanimously voted to get rid of the city’s police department in June.

More> https://dailycaller.com/2020/07/07/ilhan-omar-calls-for-the-dismantling-of-us-economy-political-system/

First it was abolish ICE, then it was abolish police, Then it was the economy, get rid of it. Okay, so let’s just dismantle the whole US system? So she is making it completely obvious, she is against our entire system.

Come here as a refugee from Somalia, and then proceed to tell us our entire system is oppressive — after becoming a US Congressperson — and needs to be torn down.

 

For your reading pleasure, here is what Trump said about her just 2 weeks ago:

Washington Examiner

“Ilhan Omar is going to be very much involved in a Biden government. They will put this hate-filled, America-bashing socialist front and center in deciding the fate of your family and deciding the fate of your country. I don’t think so.”

“She would like to make the government of our country just like the country from where she came. Somalia.”

“No government, no safety, no police. No nothing. Just anarchy. And now, she’s telling us how to run our country. No, thank you,” Trump said.

Oops, right again! Yet he was roundly attacked for what he said. Give me a break!

What Will You Kneel To?

Well, after 4-5 years in the making, has it all come down to this kneeling thing? There sure is an obsession about it. I can’t resist stating but kneeling for all the wrong reasons.

It started with Colin Kaepernick, when we all watched the protest symbol of decades become taking a knee to the national anthem. It was poo-pooed as a real issue but then respected by some as a form of protest. And protest it was but against cops, America or most everything about it.

It made Kaepernick famous for all the wrong reasons. It pretty well outed him as the radical he was. And those socks didn’t help any.

So we went through this cosmic kabuki dance where we decided we didn’t need that celebrated for the political opinion that it is. Sure we could have respected his right to his own views and speech, but this was football and his job, not his own youtube video.

But then, like everything the left does, they have to keep on pushing it. Why is it just because he is in perpetual protest I should have to agree with him? I shouldn’t and that is the point. After all, I have my free speech too. That freedom becomes a problem.

That all seems to go upside down now.

Black Lives Matter came along and we knew what they were about. It was a radical outfit with views that did not represent all Americans. BLM chased people off the stage and screamed over people, interfering with their free speech for not repeating those words and endorsing BLM’s views. Even Bernie was targeted.

They claimed they were not a political group or party. They were called non-political. Now we know them for the highly political group they are. We argued, then, that they were a radical shill for Democrats. They denied it.

Since Kaepernick started off his protest by kneeling, what better thing to do than have everyone kneeling to BLM and a movement of radicals? Now of course, anyone who does not is shunned and branded a racist. How many people bowed down to Black Lives Matter? Do they know what they’re doing?

If you didn’t understand it before, everyone should now. It is a complete turn around. Company’s grovel at BLM’s feet sending them cash. For what we don’t even know? They can all pretend BLM has no political agenda. They can even pretend what this is about.

Where did BLM go to reform itself and change its radical ways? It didn’t, it didn’t have to. Seems everyone came to them. It’s now mainstream and everyone is cool with it. What changed was the people. They have accepted these political pariahs and misfits as the cats meow they are not. And everything is supposed to be perfectly fine with this picture?

Remember Tea Parties were shunned and branded extremists. The BLM who are extremists and radicals are mainstreamed. Welcome to Crazy Town. The population is growing fast but be quiet about your normal views or we’ll ask you to leave. Common sense will not be tolerated. Thinking for yourself is not allowed.

So they’ve made taking a knee normal and the proper thing to do. But it is also kneeling to an organization with Marxist roots and no allegiance to this country, or freedom.

It has an entirely anti-American agenda and political platform. It is a radical organization run by the same It doesn’t respect our process or accept our economic system. It wants to change all of it. Venezuela and Cuba are its models. They are hardliner Soviet-style Bolshevik revolutionaries in the style of Socialists, Maoists and communists. There is no room for freedom loving nationalists, in their view.

Take a knee to that, and them, I don’t think so.

Then again, in all of it kneeling for the wrong reasons. It isn’t even in protest anymore, It is kneeling in submission to a Marxist political movement. Since when do we do that? While we could be on our knees to God asking for help to oppose and resist this humanism plot.

First it was sit down and shut up, and now it is kneel down and submit.
Just curious what oath our elected officials swore to? And what do they kneel to?

Somewhere in the back of it all, Freedom Still Matters.

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2020

World’s Worst Regime

China is now the undisputed worst regime in the world. Coronavirus only peeled away any arguments to the contrary. The world has been infected and changed by China.

On a personal note, I woke up this morning dreaming how bad things have gotten, seemingly turning everything upside down. Except it is not really a dream. What a difference 2 months have made. We also topped 50k dead in the same time.

If you want to do a simple experiment, try going to a funeral home website in one of the affected areas of the virus. You can look down a list of obituaries, which normally are filled with details about a person’s life, only to see death was related to COVID-19 – no services. It leaves a surreal knot in your throat.

How much has changed in America in a few short months? Well, the list is long from the economy to all the personal matters. Too long to list here. How big those changes are: from funerals to sporting events, schools, to shopping and having family gatherings.

Then last week the FBI Director, Chris Wray announced the major problem across the country is Coronavirus hate speech. Or people hating on the Chinese because of Covid-19. So that is a top priority for FBI to investigate? Of all the urgent priorities to take up, but he had to issue warning and guidance to all their FBI offices to be on the lookout for it.

We can compound that with the problem of getting out Coronavirus economic aid to people and small businesses. Look at the same old typical responses in Congress. Mass exodus, they went to ground but they still clung to those leftist ideological dreams over lives.

But let’s not lose sight of the forest for the trees. All this, hard as it is to remember, ties directly back to the original China cause of Coronavirus in the first place.

Then we have the whole political perspective problem. Congressman James Clyburn said that Coronavirus was a huge political opportunity. Corona Cuomo said we have to re-imagine our entire economy in reopening it. Re-imagine? Nancy Pelosi held out for weeks for her political agenda of the Left. The users and abusers surround us while we fight off a pandemic. Their rationalizations are absurd, yet we must fight the pandemic disease too. Note to Cuomo, there was nothing wrong with the economy pre-COVID-19.

AOC announced that when the economy does reopen, workers should all boycott it by refusing to go back to work in some sick act of political solidarity. How’s that help?

But in the end, we must remember and never forget the actual cause of this Panditrosity was entirely set off by China. The rest and even the political atrocity are all still symptoms of that whole. Do not lose sight of the origin of this pandemic, regardless of what Dir. Wray says. It was not caused by hate or the economy either. It was the other way around.

Andrew Cuomo said in a daily briefing that the new boutique industry in the US is now mask art. With that he smiles. Have we become a mask-wearing people?

So we have succumbed to wearing masks as a last resort to protect ourselves and others. For years we have seen this strange phenomena in Asian countries of wearing masks in public. We always assumed we don’t wear masks here in public. Well, now for ourselves and because of government guidelines, we are wearing masks. What a change.

Let’s hope the mask fad is temporary. But mask art?

Still that barely touches the surface on all the strange new things brought on by this. I will leave you with one extra thought. We may never know what would have been, we can only guess, but the year 2020 was shaping up to be something else entirely. COVID intervened. Whatever that was would have been better than a pandemic. We will never know. And there would have been 50 thousand more people alive to witness it. Thanks China!

Right Ring | Bullright

Smooth Swamp Operator

Deep in the vestiges of the habitat known as the DC Swamp, trolls the last remnants of this dynasty like no other. They were bathed, baptized and weaned into the Swamp culture. It was their established ecosystem.

Every region has its own tales, either myth or legend, of all sorts passed down through local residents. No one may know the exact source of these stories. What is important is that they are — or in the words of locals, that the stories themselves exist in fact or fiction for each person to make his/her judgment as to legitimacy.

Taken with a grain of salt, or swallowed in whole detail, it is up to each to accept, reject or dismiss these taller than life tales. Some people reserve judgment and would rather not say one way or another. Some people are quick to pronounce a verdict or their own theories about them. But most at least have heard of the legends.

The mystique about them seems to take on a subculture of its own. In some cases, they are only tall tales started by someone sometime. In other cases, there is substance as basis for them. Some were jokes and others were far from it. It really is a mixed bag. These tales live on to become part of the heritage of locals.

But in one such case, at least, there have been rumors and stories for decades that were not completely confirmed. All of them revolved on the very idea of a Deep State working on its own will within, which permeated the basin known as the Swamp in DC.

Many of us believed in the idea and many rejected it with a vengeance. But it was a topic of debate based largely on hearsay evidence and speculations. Opinions ran the gambit from belief to absolute denial. And those of a particular view were branded conspiracy theorists or tin-foil hat dupes. It was seen more like taboo or voodoo.

But in this type of debate there never really was a right or wrong view. All were welcomed and were all treated with a fair amount of skepticism – from deniers to theorists. No one could claim victory with certainty.

That is until recently. No longer can the topic be only dismissed out of hand. But a conversation about it all has still not been forthcoming. I wonder why?

Well, old habits die hard. Old opinions have deep roots with tenuous attachments it turns out. It is hard to dismiss something you have vehemently denied for decades, much less dignify it by talking about it. It is rather inconvenient for deniers to admit to. No one relishes being duped. Some can simply pretend it has not been exposed. Now the truth is finally out there.

But ironically within, for the group that makes up this network of Deep State, everyone knows how real it all is along with how much power it wields. That is not disputable. In fact that is the whole point of it all. There is a collective pride knowing they are the movers and shakers who matter in the realm of power. Even creatures of the swamp know their own habitat. And they know it well.

No one would ever convince this Deep State they did not exist or were not a real power. They would chuckle at the denial. It would not be controversial to them. They see constant proof of their affect and thrive on it. The more overt proof is the more pride in it.

And the only thing that could threaten them, or the habitat that spawned them, was a negative outside force opposed to their existence. One cannot oppose something if one does not acknowledge it is there. Confronting it was never something anyone was willing to do before. That really was taboo. After all, Deep State has the means to fight back and is quite willing to use it.

The swamp has its own scorekeepers and enforcement mechanisms. It is a sovereign environment where the only enemies are outsiders who might venture across its path. Deep State deals with opponents the way it sees fit. When you are the enforcers, you are granted special privileges. But their first priority is always to protect the ecosystem of the swamp. Thus, it becomes a self-supporting, independent environment of its own, accountable really to no one – especially outsiders.

How could anyone even contemplate dismantling it? The Swamp would evolve to suit its own survival whenever threatened anyway. No doubt many who did venture across its path just decided to leave well enough alone. Plus any other outsiders would not necessarily believe in one’s dilemma. That would be to admit it exists, which people were not willing to do. (Openly at least)

Along came the movement and then presidency of Donald Trump. They had no illusions about the reality of Deep State or the Swamp. It had been seen in things like Benghazi and was working its will in the Hillary server and ‘pay to play’ investigation. It was behind the scenes in the IRS scandal targeting conservatives. And we just knew, without doubt, which political side it was really on. It never seemed to oppose Democrats. It always covers for them. Nope, no questions about its existence.

The further Trump’s campaign went the more obvious the power and influence of Deep State became. And when he was elected, all hell really broke loose including a prepackaged insurance policy designed to blow up his presidency. It not he has the final say.

The beauty of their system is it is hard to point to one culprit when it is coalition of now radicalized operators within, skilled in the arts of using government for their own swampy interests, to serve their personal gains.

The smooth swamp operator is the combined concert of parts and people serving the political interests of the Swamp. Besides, when would the ecosystem that created it all, in their various capacities, ever fight back against the habitat? So they confidently troll on.

Right Ring | Bullright || ©2020