Nightmares In Déjà vu

There is something to be said about nightmares. Sometimes the worst ones come back. And those are the ones you vividly remember, too. Sometimes you wish you could forget them but you cannot. You wonder where they came from or what spawned them?

So the Obama-Biden years were like a nightmare. It was one of the worst that went on way too long. A dark period many had said was inevitably bound to lead back to common sense virtues. Eventually people would reject it all as leaders would mount an opposition. A good thing in the end. It didn’t work that way.

Now I feel like those nightmares are being injected back into my consciousness. They are back with only slight changes. The characters, some original and others replaced, in that same central theme. This time more determined with more fear than even before. This time with more concentration. They’ve broken through reality and taken up permanent residency in my consciousness.

For instance, one media pundit was a little sad saying Joe Biden probably will not have a honeymoon as president. Ah that is a pity. But the guy was in office for 47 years. He had a half-century-long honeymoon. And he enriched himself quite well along the way. The last thing he deserves is a honeymoon. But us?

Instead, we the people do not get a honeymoon. We do not get a break from anything. We are thrust right back into the nightmares of the Obama years. This time they want to torture everyone into submission. Think that is a bit exaggerated?

In only two days, Biden and company have already declared war on (our) culture, energy, rule of law, security, the economy, values, climate, the Constitution, rights. courts, any opposition, the election system, business, family, history, education or choice, our way of life, America’s sovereignty, border security, and the country itself. They declared war on the first, second, fourth, fifth, ninth, tenth, and fourteenth amendments. More to follow.

And all that is just the beginning with China and it’s total dominance breathing down America’s near future. Submission to Demcrats’ twisted and failed ideology is only a stepping-stone to the Chinese CCP threat looming.

But even all that is not enough. Biden and Democrats demand a non-stop gloat-fest from media for everything they are doing. So they are getting it.

And the last four years?

Just forget all that; abolish it from your memory. Make the current conditions so bad one is forced to forget the Trump years. Forget the possibilities, the hope, the hard and slow change we made from their 8-year abyss. But our nightmares are back with vengeance.

Back to the future.

It has its groups and cancel culture as enforcers. Step out of line now and you will be permanently penalized. Do you want that? Of course not. It has what even Obama never had: the full, unified force of proxy enforcers to carry out their will.

We the people are apparently the only ones who have not bought into all the crazy notions, none of which Joe talked about during the campaign. Now they come out of the woodwork.

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2021

Come What May: DOJ Show And Tell

There was a popular song somewhere in the 80’s, “walk like an Egyptian.” It was all the rage but more than a song, it was a metaphor for the times.

In that vein, doing something I detest, I will think like a liberal. I know, it hurts me to say it and can be dangerous because no one needs to give them any ideas. Hopefully, I can land this 747 somewhere on the ball field. When they go low… we keep digging deeper.

I thought about special counsel Durham and possibility of a special counsel to Hunter Biden — or current lack of one. How might Democrats react to any bad news?

Well, we already know how they act to anything that is good news, even partia;ly good. If they have to take one good nugget out of something, they will monopolize that element. I have watched liberals so long; I almost know how they think.

So let’s suppose some bad details come out about what Comey and the coup team did in 2016. Any harsh details will be contrasted to the Mueller report. They will try to remain on their platform that the Crossfire Hurricane was a justified investigation.

Why would I know that? Comey, McCabe, Brennan and company dug in their heels everywhere saying they had to investigate it. I expect Dems will continue that story, having Democrats like Schiff bang that drum.

But the alternative is what else can they say? In the face of damning evidence, “oops?”

They can’t admit it was an egregious abuse of power. They can’t admit fabricating evidence to propel an investigation, They can’t admit doing Hillary;s bidding. They can’t admit to collaborating with Hillary, led by a foreign agent and Russian spies. They can’t admit the lengths they went, or were prepared to go, to make the preferred narrative fit.

By the way, have you noticed how with every explosive or incriminating story about the Left, or Deep State, media has this compulsion to plug in the Left’s talking points to explain it… or justify it? Then everyone defers to the Left’s explanation or narrative. That becomes the only “coverage” of the story.

But why can we not talk about or discuss a story without inserting the Left’s talking points? Who said that is the rule? The coup is only one glaring example.

So suppose things come together, miraculously, which point to the Lefts’ involvement, culpability and intent in cooking up the whole thing? Forget their narrative for a moment.

That would be nice. It could happen. Suppose evidence is so much and so obvious that the weight on the dam breaks? Suppose they decide to just throw much of the information out there because A) it doesn’t matter that much anymore or B) they cannot contain the bulk of it that has slipped out already.(and they want to move away from it)

So they make a conscious decision to tell us but in such a way knowing we can’t do anything about it now. The only thing left is to admit it, in part, but still adhere to the line that they didn’t really do anything wrong that was breaking the law.

Yes, this could all happen, maybe with slight variations to it.

But I expect how they would handle that would be the same basic strategy the Left employed before. That is not complete denial. It is more like the yes but defense. Yes, we did certain things but the reasoning is our excuse.

The reasoning for it goes something like this. But remember this is after they get caught with their hand in the cookie jar.

They might say well yes, but what was done was apparently not bad enough and actually did not harm or alter the presidency. See, even if this is all so, Trump has gone on to fill out his term, and did not seem be that affected from it all. (it does get absurd)

Think of it as a similar defense to the election and fraud. So what?

In fact, Trump actually proved that a president can still function effectively even if all this was opposed to him. No one deprived him of his duties, which he was able to carry out. So any harm to the president is being over blown. Frankly, we don’t see where the institution of the presidency was permanently harmed.

And just the fact that he went through this, even if it were all so, shows that the beautiful system works. We find out if there were errors or offenses committed and we move on. But Trump was never endangered or prevented from doing his job.

So this test proved that the system works, The presidency survived in tact and is preserved. The system dealt with it and we persevered just fine. This is what should happen, the way it should work. We investigate and act accordingly. The lesson is the system worked. It was stronger than what anyone tried to do, or anything Trump did.

I’m sorry of that sounds just like a liberal talking because those are the kinds of things they say. It is the “any defense theory.” Throw anything out there to defend the indefensible.

I know I have made some assumptions here, I know there are some what-ifs and maybe a little optimism that schemes will be exposed. Can you see where any of this is possible?

How much could happen we will find out. Hopefully we will.

They said that about election fraud, The fraud was not enough to have changed the result. Therefore the result mitigates the fraud that happened. It is not enough to matter.
Likewise, what they did in the coup was not enough to affect things so it doesn’t matter. They take the position it had no major effect, even if it led to a phony impeachment.

And the impeachment too showed the system worked. We are stronger now for having gone through it. This is the reasoning we are dealing with on the Left. They wil try to use the situation to mitigate what they did. Sort of like a third-grader arguing out of breaking the window. The damage is not irreparable so it doesn’t matter.

The same thing applied to Hillary’s emails. No harm no foul because nothing was affected by it. All they see is victimless crimes – if they are even crimes at all. (which is the next step) No one would prosecute it – the Comey defense. (done…. there that was easy)

Of course they will not admit the Russian Hoax sets the precedent for unfettered spying on a campaign. That doesn’t matter to them. All that matters is who controls the levers of power. As long as they do, anything is therefore permissible. But if they don’t control it, then anything is justified in returning power to their hands.

Sure, you can walk like an Egyptian but it is harder to act like a liberal.

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2020

How Much Fraud Is Enough?

The Senate held hearings on the 2020 election with the underlying premise whether all the fraud and problems could have affected the outcome of the election?

Or to rephrase my question, how much fraud is too much?

The thrust of this is: only if the apparent fraud would have made a difference in the outcome is it a real problem. If not, it does not matter. So Democrats assert it was not too much fraud for their tolerance. Have some confidence in that? I don’t think so.

To make matters worse, you have two different sides saying two completely different things. On one side you have people claiming this was the most fair and secure election in history. On the other, people are saying it is the most fraud-plagued election with serious Constitutional issues ever. Of course both cannot be right.

The former assumption is so far off, no one could reasonably believe that.

Actually, to deny fraud took place is conspicuous enough. But to claim the election was fraud-free and perfect is so far from any rational logic and wreaks with deception.

Why do Democrats have to recoil back to the position that no fraud existed at all? Chuck Schumer now even dubs it our wonderful democracy. Schumer on the Senate Floor:

“When is this nonsense, so detrimental to our democracy, going to end? When? It’s already deeply irresponsible for my Republican colleagues, many of them, to stay silent about President Trump’s deliberate attempts to poison Americans’ faith in our elections.” /… [faith in elections??]

“So in conclusion, Chairman Johnson should call off this ridiculous charade of a Senate hearing, immediately. And if he won’t, Leader McConnell should intervene to ensure that the Committee does not indulge such quackery and conspiracy theories. And he should acknowledge the results of the elections and make clear it’s time to move on, just as he was happy to do so when the shoe was on the other foot. Doing otherwise will add fuel to the fire that is undermining faith in our wonderful democracy.

For four years they were not calling it wonderful or anything except at risk, insecure and in jeopardy. Now it is a paragon of legitimacy — not a shred of suspicion or criminality.

Our wonderful democracy“….after four years of attacking it at the core.

It is so disingenuous to deny the problems and fraud. So then Dems fall back on their other excuse that nothing shows the outcome would be different. Yet that is all around us.

Why should the qualifier of fraud be whether it was enough or not enough to change their results? The problems abound. Shouldn’t chronic fraud and problems be enough?

But how much fraud is enough is absolutely the wrong basis for election integrity, or our confidence in it. I’m not confident that America has a tolerance for election fraud.

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2020

Accountability Zero

Why does this country have such an accountability deficit? To weigh that, I looked into both sides. I see a lot of the same problems within. Guess where it comes from?

It requires a quick trip down memory lane just to illuminate the problem.

Take it back to 2016. I’ve written much about that primary and the nomination shake out. In the end, Trump had the nomination then won the race. Start right there.

The reason he won had much to do with the lack of accountability in the same old establishment politics and process. So people got fed up and wanted to reign in power.

Okay, so it was nasty and we know what happened. Once elected, the Left planted their feet in resistance. Again, expected. As Trump started to line up his cabinet and team, remember what happened? More resistance on everything he did.

The left said they would brand everyone who took a job in the administration. They wanted a full boycott of Trump positions. Fortunately, Trump was picking from a different pool and managed to find enough people willing to serve.

That did not stop the left though. Then they threatened anyone who took a position that they would not work in DC again. But the officials did so anyway, putting it on the line.

If these threats were not enough to keep them from joining, then what were the benefits, if any, of joining Trump’s administration? I don’t know about all, except there was an idea positive results would prevail over time, and on what they would accomplish. If they hung in, those results would vindicate them. People would see it and feel the outcome.

So there was risk but was worth a chance because they were going to change status quo, which had not gotten positive results. Plus Trump was making a point to put America First instead of last. Team Trump had no interest in leading from behind.

But the Lockstep Left was out to make that as hard as possible – hopefully to drive Trump out. Those are facts. Democrats made no secret of it, from boycotting his inauguration to keeping an investigation going as a basis for removal. Again, undisputed facts.

Trump operated in that backdrop despite protests and sedition. The administration went to work to prove all their ignorant assumptions wrong. Well, those results/outcomes should have satisfied most people, other than hard-line Marxists, or staunch anti-Trumpers – for their own reasons. That should satisfy the people en masse.

One must go through the entire primary context to see what people wanted and what they opposed. But one demand was accountability. If we got that much, it would help correct our entire course. Many of us believed eventually we would get that accountability. It might take some work but we would get it, one way or another.

So accountability was further defined. It was just basic accountability that we should expect from government but until then was totally absent. We were not asking much.

Threats on Trump and his administration continued. It evolved into an impeachment over a phone call. It offered a hint. That call was about accountability for what Biden-Obama did in foreign affairs, like Ukraine. Selling out the country was real — not in regards to Trump but regarding Biden and Obama. We know where that ended up.

Fast forward, we had an election that the Left cheered as a Biden victory. But hold your horses, it was not that clear. Never mind, says the Left, we got this. But no one else asked any accountability questions of Biden. Then they moved to start Biden’s team for 2021.

And this completes the tale of accountability.

I’m not disputing it all, just stating what they did. Along the way, they declared everyone who had worked in the administration or supported Trump be blacklisted. Remember they started that way. Sure enough, Dems were taking names telling people they would not work in public or private sectors again. What had Trump done?

Actually he was pretty successful. And the left kept insisting this election was about the pandemic, which they politicized and weaponized. The positive results still stand, too numerous to list. Democrats claimed the election was accountability for leadership.

Democrats wanted revenge against Trump, and everyone to pay. They call this some kind of twisted accountability – redefining the term. Remember mpeachment, investigations fell flat, They call this accountability? All the good they refuse to talk about.

Now if you boiled all of it down to a common denominator, it is accountability. The left wants an accountability, like revenge, to prevent it from happening again, Therefore, blacklisting is accountability. They redefined the term.

Conservatives on the right want real accountability. That’s all it was ever about to us. Simply to hold those accountable for what they did. Is that too much to ask?

The differences are crystallizing in recent events. Look how they are treating Trump and anyone connected to the administration. Now look at the team Biden is putting together. Any echoes or hints of accountability? It’sthe opposite; a slap in the face.

We see old guard, swamp creatures who were part of the problems for a decade. Sullivan, Kerry, Biden, Antony Blinkin, Rice. Plenty more to come, drawn from that same pool.

Biden set out to plant deep state creatures back into government to shore up its operation. His slogan is “build back better.” Really? That means deep state. Joe Biden’s people are also inquiring within bureaus and departments about any changes Trump made. So the first mission is reverse changes. Revert to the deep state paradigm.

They do know how to do that, they created it.

Now Dems will assure us they are very responsible, that they will be held accountable. Complete nonsense. Accountability is what they are programmed to prevent..

However, look at this political jihad against Trump people. Biden’s people have been a part of this contortion and corruption of government for decades. No accountability for that.

But those career Swamp-insiders are not scorned, blacklisted, harassed or banished from public or private sectors. They are swooned over and welcomed. If not in government, they are sought as experts in media — as advocates of effective, rational government.

Unaccountability has been normalized and institutionalized.

Accountability is starting to look like fools’ gold, where only fools think it is real.

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2020

Hiding Biden

There is a theory that a Biden residency would only be a stark reminder of all the problems with status quo politics and how bad things can be. The dark winter candidate, indeed.

It definitely is an insult to turn the clock back to the Obama years, as if it were the answer. In eight years, they could not show us the benefits or how we were better off for all their radicalism and specious globalism — leading from behind, chanting “don’t do stupid shit.”

It only proved that Americans did not want that.

In fact, this election demonstrated people don’t want socialism. They don’t want globalist tyranny. When socialism and radicalism are on the ballot, people reject it.

But those were always on the ballot with Obama, only people chose not to see it. When faced directly with it, people are repulsed by the ideas. Marxism is not attractive.

A return to Biden, in the wake of Obama misery, would be a forced reminder of corruption, politics of status quo, ruling class elites and the establishment we had rejected.

It will only be a reminder of our real, true resistance to all that assails the American dream. A regime so ideally simpatico with all that becomes a giant flashing light. So this charade cannot go on unabated, unchallenged. It becomes a symbol for the evil it generates.

That will conjure to the fore all that Biden, with Obmma as well, are hiding. The corruption of Joe is a metaphor for it all. A reminder of what we oppose, exposed in broad daylight.

A term of rejection

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2020

Peaceful Transfer Of Power

Have any more deceitful and radicalized words ever been used toward an election, or its outcome, than peaceful transfer of power? The acronym PTP works for me.

So the people who authored the most contentious, unpeaceful, undemocratic and protested transition in American history now lecture us about a peaceful transition of power.

First of all, can anyone tell me anything Democrats do peacefully? What have they done? Violence and threats are usually the appetizer or chaser for whatever plans they have up their sleeve. But now they are in flower-child mode. Climb aboard the peace train.

Interesting too that they haven’t complained about the anti-peace rallies all summer. They only got concerned when they thought riots and violence could hurt them in the election.

Did you hear them complaining about Portland or Seattle and those, achem, peaceful transitions of power? Did they caution Antifa or BLM about peaceful transfers of goods when they looted and burned neighborhoods? Not much of a peace movement there.

But I don’t think a coup qualifies as a peaceful transition of power either.

One would almost think what Democrats really desire is a non-peaceful transfer of power, to coincide with their corrupted democracy. That does seem to excite them.

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2020

Preserving Our Democracy

Where were all these preservationists of democracy four years ago? If anyone here is defining democracy downward, it is Democrats.

We had four years of war against our democracy. Now they believe in democracy?

If they really cared about it, they would care about all the rule changes and undemocratic means they went to in subverting democracy, to reimagine our election system.

Actually, good oversight and checks would only support and defend democracy. But they are against all that. No questions asked.

They told us it was the smoothest election ever. (that ought to scare you) It worked like a charm. After years of telling us elections were at risk and in jeopardy. How dare we disagree about election interference and manipulation everywhere? Then suddenly elections are smooth as silk in the biggest election reconstruction effort ever.

Joe Biden kept saying “voting is happening now” but he couldn’t state his positions.

Dems had just spent four years telling us democracy was breached, broken, and on life support. They even used it as a basis in their sham impeachment trial in January. And they stuck that trial up against the State of the Union Speech to undermine that.

We know they don’t care about hypocrisy. It only bothers the people though, not democrats. They will reverse their stand as soon as it is necessary, and as fast.

Protecting the integrity of elections and voting matters not to the Democrats either. Democracy is supposedly whatever they want to do.

So why do Dems make such a big deal about democracy anyway? Because we care, they know it is important to us. It is our means to send the elected ruling class a message.

They proved how much they cared about that sacred democracy over the last five years. They did not care about protecting it, in process, before 2016 or for four years after.

In fact, it did not matter that they were undermining democracy the entire time. They deligitimized a duly elected president. They fought to disenfranchise everyone who voted for and supported him. Actually, they denied democracy any part in the whole process.

A coup is not democracy. And let’s not forget those cauldrons of democracy that sprang up in riots, looting, and burning down stores. They called them mostly peaceful protests – a ptotected right. “You can’t blame them, it is about democracy.”

Now they concoct an election nightmare with rules bypassing legislatures and enacted by rogue officials and judges. Then it becomes pristine democracy. Who should question the results of such an election? Just like that, four years of questioning those results of the last election was tossed like a Trump ballot.

When you start asking questions about the process now, you are defying sacred grounds. Suddenly we don’t question election processes. That’s off limits.

Excuse me for being sickened by this one-way democracy sham. Cry me a river when they don’t get their way. Then it is time to riot, burn and loot.

Store owners were prepared for predictable violence if Dems did not get their way. Businesses boarded up in advance of the election, knowing full well what to expect.

This one time they were safe because Democrats appeared to get their way by using all their tactics. Had it gone the other way, well, it would still be burning. How many would have been killed or injured? How many stores would have been cleaned out, again?

Afterward, they would blame Trump for all of it it, for winning the election. It would have been called an “attack on democracy.” Not what they did but what Trump did by winning.

Spare me all the lectures from Biden, Obama and media about “preserving our sacred democracy.” The democracy means nothing to them, as meaningless as the Constitution.

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2020

Coup In The Works

Okay kiddies, let the grownups in the room speak about serious matters civilly now. Or at least take their best crack at it. But know they are serious about what they are doing.

The Coming Coup?

Michael Anton

Essay — 09.04.2020

Democrats are laying the groundwork for revolution right in front of our eyes.

As if 2020 were not insane enough already, we now have Democrats and their ruling class masters openly talking about staging a coup. You might have missed it, what with the riots, lockdowns and other daily mayhem we’re forced to endure in this, the most wretched year of my lifetime. But it’s happening.

It started with the military brass quietly indicating that the troops should not follow a presidential order. They were bolstered by many former generals—including President Trump’s own first Secretary of Defense—who stated openly what the brass would only hint at. Then, as nationwide riots really got rolling in early June, the sitting Secretary of Defense himself all but publicly told the president not to invoke the Insurrection Act. His implicit message was: “Mr. President, don’t tell us to do that, because we won’t, and you know what happens after that.”

All this enthused Joe Biden, who threw subtlety to the winds. The former United States Senator (for 26 years) and Vice President (for eight) has not once, not twice, but thrice confidently asserted that the military will “escort [Trump] from the White House with great dispatch” should the president refuse to leave. Another former Vice President, Al Gore, publicly agreed.

One might dismiss such comments as the ravings of a dementia patient and a has-been who never got over his own electoral loss. But before you do, consider also this. Over the summer a story was deliberately leaked to the press of a meeting at which 100 Democratic grandees, anti-Trump former Republicans, and other ruling class apparatchiks got together (on George Soros’s dime) to “game out” various outcomes of the 2020 election. One such outcome was a clear Trump win. In that eventuality, former Bill Clinton White House Chief of Staff John Podesta, playing Biden, refused to concede, pressured states that Trump won to send Democrats to the formal Electoral College vote, and trusted that the military would take care of the rest.

The leaked report from the exercise darkly concluded that “technocratic solutions, courts, and reliance on elites observing norms are not the answer here,” promising that what would follow the November election would be “a street fight, not a legal battle.”

Two more data points (among several that could be provided). Over the summer, two former Army officers, both prominent in the Democrat-aligned “national security” think tank world, wrote an open letter to the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs in which they urged him to deploy the 82nd Airborne Division to drag President Trump from the Oval Office at precisely 12:01 PM, January 20, 2021.

About a month later, Hillary Clinton declared publicly that Joe Biden should not concede the election “under any circumstances.” The old English major in me interprets the word “any” to mean “no,” “none,” “nada,” “niente,” “zero,” “zilch” “bupkis”…you get the idea.

This doesn’t sound like the rhetoric of a political party confident it will win an upcoming election. …./ (must read)

Continue reading at https://americanmind.org/essays/the-coming-coup/

As that old saying goes, if it happens in politics, you can bet it was planned. And it will be like nothing we’ve ever seen before. Let’s call it Coup On Main Street.

So while the Democrats and media openly broadcast their outrage over their oetty grievances with Trump, this is what they have brewing among their ruling class elites.

Coming Attractions: Port-Amerika

For anyone listening: I am only a messenger, one voice, and I control nothing or no one. But there is one interesting message I have to pass along now.

Please put it in context that the Left has been at this for months, for years, and their rhetoric is always high. That in mind, this comes from collective Marxist organizers.

I don’t know that they can crank tensions up any higher but that is their idea.

Black Panther Disciples
BPDisciples — [Twitter]
REMEMBER:

#September1st is the first day of
#SuperStrikeSeptember:

Collision symbol
Largest organized #GeneralStrike in modern US history

Collision symbol
Begins the same day as the nationwide #MarchForJustice for #BreonnaTaylor

Collision symbol
Every city will implement the #PortlandPrototype protest model

 

(BPD)–On September 1st, 2020, the Black Lives Matter movement, in #solidarity with the US #LaborMovement, shall make history. Together, the People will rise up and seize the reins of power and production and finally set this nation on the right path. The plan is simple:

What we already knew, Portland is their protest model, their prototype. And they plan on pollenating that across America. I certainly hope the DOJ is watching it like the rest of us.

They boast this riot model of violence and urban terrorism has been sustained for over ninety days. So they plan on duplicating that success everywhere they can.

And there is definitely a solidarity with media and Democrat pols. What is left to the imagination? Now you know what to expect from Dems and media who amp it up.

Right Ring | Bullright

How Bad Is It For Dems? Backfire

This is the only DNC convention where it can happen remotely, and on another split screen you can watch the Demo-base celebrating in the streets of Portland or Chicago with fireworks, bricks and Molotov cocktails. But only on Fox News.

Not since 1968 has there been a convention this exciting.

Where Democrats can chip into Biden/Harris one minute and donate bail money for rioting thugs the next. What’s not to like about that? I think they covered all their bases.

If I hear their line once more that “it didn’t have to be this way,” I’m going to puke.

But how bad is it for Democrats these days? It’s so bad that even Demo-media comrades don’t want to show the rioting and looting palooza on TV. They’ve been blacking out BLM activities. (It would probably only incite more photogenic rioters.)

18 U.S. Code Section 2102. – Definitions (b)
As used in this chapter, the term “to incite a riot”, or “to organize, promote, encourage, participate in, or carry on a riot”, includes, but is not limited to, urging or instigating other persons to riot, but shall not be deemed to mean the mere oral or written (1) advocacy of ideas or (2) expression of belief, not involving advocacy of any act or acts of violence or assertion of the rightness of, or the right to commit, any such act or acts.

So they’re self-censoring the riots and looting coverage. Why? Because at least they know how much it disgusts people and would reveal Democrats’ M/O. Nearly 3 months and the PR has only gotten worse not better. It’s so bad they refuse to show it.

I can tell you I’m not in line at Wal-Mart hearing lots of people say “if only I could be in Portland or Seattle rioting now.” It ain’t glamorous even to Democrats.

Yet these are the same commie thugs and criminals Democrat pols are defending as peaceful protestors. Show me ten Democrat protestors and I’ll show you a riot in the making. Give ‘em an hour and a half. And their networking capabilities are great.

But the Demo-media are complaining about Trump using the words nasty, mean or angry. Have you ever seen people more angry or hate-filled than this bunch of Democrat activists? Even back in the 60’s, The Resistance would have been a garage music band.

Weather Underground was more shadowy. These cats have the support of elected pols. Now sedition is the bell-bottoms of the 70’s. Rioting is the new sit-in. Blocking an interstate is the new street festival – peace out!. Anti-peace is the new activism. Injustice for all.

But it doesn’t look good to American people. Cheering them on is not attractive either.

So how do you piss off a Democrat? Viva La Flag! It works every time.

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2020

Seen This Movie Before, Lousy Ending

There are things considered natural responses to human tragedies and pains, like empathy and compassion. Not all people may be so equipped in those areas. Some may be slower in response to it than others. Some may be incapable of those reactions.

But that was usually the general rule.

However, when a person is shot by a policeman, why is the instant response looting and rioting? What causes that because apparently it is a cause and effect scenario? It has become a downright phenomena. A black person is shot in the course of enforcing the law and the knee-jerk reaction is looting and destroying businesses that have nothing at all to do with the act. They go from claiming an innocent victim to creating innocent victims.

But somehow this rioting and looting is to go on, unobstructed as can be allowed. Where is this in the Constitution or in any rules for a functional society? I haven’t found them yet. Though this has become the normal, typical reaction to the events. It also seems to be organized in moments. Within hours, caravans of cars come in heading for the high value stores as mobs of people do the rest, to carry out out an organized pilfering process. They cart off any merchandise and disappear into the streets from where they came.

Daily Mail:

‘We’re coming for you’: Mayor Lightfoot’s warning to looters who ransacked Chicago in night of ‘straight-up criminality’ that saw 100 arrests and 13 cops injured

    • Chicago’s Magnificent Mile was hit by looters after hundreds of demonstrators clashed with police
    • It was triggered by a shooting earlier in the day and an armed suspect was wounded by police
    • The man had opened fire on cops and they returned; he was taken to the hospital and is expected to survive
    • Crowds however gathered in protest after false information spread that the officers shot a child
    • People then started organizing on Twitter and Facebook to loot downtown in a caravan of vehicles
    • By the time police caught up with them, they’d started ransacking stores, snatching all that they could
    • 400 cops were dispatched to the area but they faced intense violence including, in some cases, gunfire
    • On Monday morning, the chaos was still ongoing as officers arrested people who were still inside stores
    • Bridges were raised and tunnels closed for police to try to get a handle on the escalating tensions
    • It coincided with the sixth anniversary of Michael Brown’s death in Ferguson, Missouri
    • Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot said the looting had nothing to do with peaceful protest over police brutality
    • She warned the protesters that police were already scanning HD security footage to identify and arrest looters, saying: ‘We are coming for you’
    • Lightfoot said the city does not need the National Guard’s help; Trump is yet to comment but on Monday he urged Portland to accept federal assistance after a riot was declared

    Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot warned looters who ransacked the city that they are already being hunted by police who are reviewing HD security camera footage from the chaos which saw more than 100 arrests, attacks on 13 police officers and widespread unrest.

    The chaos began on Sunday afternoon when police responded to Englewood where there had been complaints of a man with a gun. The suspect has not been named but was described by police on Monday as a 20-year-old man with a criminal history that includes charges of burglary, child endangerment and assault and battery.

    When officers arrived at the scene, he began running and opened fire on them as they pursued him. The cops returned fire, wounding him, and arrested him. He was taken to the hospital and is expected to survive.

See: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8611143/Another-night-violence-Looting-breaks-Chicagos-Magnificent-Mile.html

Despite what she says, what makes this time any different than other times where she did nothing or little in response to crimes and shootings? Every weekend there are drive-byes and shootings, some victims are children and toddlers, yet she does nothing. Now she says: attention criminals, “we’re coming for you!”

The renowned expert, AOC, said weeks ago that some of this crime wave is because people may have to go out and steal a morsel of bread for their family to survive on. As if the person has no other choice. It was crazy talk when she said it but now, once again, we see the same reactions playing out over another shooting by police of a black man in Chicago. No one cares what led up to it, or the reason for it; it only turns into another lucrative looting opportunity. Except they aren’t stealing bread, baby formula and diapers.

Daily Mail:

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has suggested the rise in crime in New York City is because ‘desperate’ people are ‘stealing bread to feed their children’.

Police data shows that shootings in the city last month were up 130 per cent year on the year – from 89 shootings last year to 205 this year.

But Cortez asked: ‘Do we think this has to do with the fact that there’s record unemployment in the United States right now?”

The Hill reported:

AOC on increased NYC crime: “Maybe this has to do with the fact that people aren’t paying their rent & are scared to pay their rent & so they go out & they need to feed their child & they don’t have money so… they feel like they either need to shoplift some bread or go hungry.”

So there you have it. Apparently those people in Chicago are just shoplifting some bread to feed their family. Let’s see if they can explain this latest looting frenzy. Cleanup in isle #1.

Still it is a phenomena, I tell you.

Gee, I wonder if AOC has ever felt any empathy or compassion for people struggling to make ends meet while paying their exorbitant taxes, and just trying to survive? Nah.

Right Ring | Bullright

Sympathy for Communists

What’s next, defunding police and then the fire departments? Abolishing common sense is on the docket. Laughing is no longer an option.

The Rolling Stones had a hit with Sympathy for the Devil but what we are witnessing here in live time is sympathy for the left. And it is just as bad.

As the song goes, please allow me to introduce them. First they are not all bad. What I’ve personally seen helps me understand that. What we think of the Left is all who get behind these radical ideas, creating the mob, though I don’t think that is entirely fair.

I’ve seen a lot of dumb when it comes to the Left. There are plenty in the movement who are not as whacky as AOC or as radical as the Weather Underground. They are dupes.

Here is the problem. I am trying to be careful about generalizing too far. Many people who support these radical Left are now regular people, I argue, who may be naïve and don’t know any better. However, these are people who want to go along with every new idea the Left spouts as the latest great cause of popular commotion. A feel good palooza.

It’s a simple idealism in their mind, like the Obama campaign, that they just want to believe in and belong to. They desperately want to be a part of it for whatever reasons. And belong they will, if it means being duped and used by these radicals.

Not all crazy ideas are good ones.

Now what we see with the latest defunding police idea is more than meets the eye, as nothing does happen in isolation. It is cutting cops and putting communists in charge.

Would all these duped Leftists endorse those goals? Probably not; but it is the latest feel good idea that makes no practical sense, which only requires one to believe in it and keep on believing. Then just chant the cute phrases. So in other words, it is a faith-based movement requiring your submission to the will of radical Marxists. Lockstep or lose.

Yes, the craziest really are running the asylum but they don’t do it alone. Remember that. Sympathy for Communists works its magic. Watching it can be almost as hypnotic.

Right Ring | Bullright

Two Groups Where?

The two groups that don’t diverge, leading to the same destination.

I have had it with the “two different groups” excuse mantra about the riots taking place. The theory is you have two groups: the peaceful protestors on one hand and these bad anarchists doing the damage, looting and burning on the other.

By day they are “peaceful, righteous protestors” but by night they are raging anarchists.

But why should we go to pains to differentiate “two groups” when they themselves don’t?

Since when is it our job to separate the two? I even heard right on cue that it is white supremacists causing the damage and looting. Sure, that’s what all the pictures show.

Then Saturday night CNN’s Don Lemon wondered out loud to an on-location reporter if the fires in LA could be caused by “collateral damage” from the police activity? Does that make any sense? Nice try. Still, he wondered how or why these fires started?

Well, anything to deny the very real long-term, random damage of protest riots and defer the blame. I’m sick of being told to separate that which does not want to be separated.

One cop was arrested for the death of George Floyd but they demand all the cops be arrested. So even if it was just one cop who did it, all the cops must be held legally culpable by their standard. Same for rioters. Yet when it is protest riots, we are somehow supposed to differentiate between peaceful protestors, anarchists, looters and arsonists?

But the basic slogan of protestors is “no justice no peace” — among other anti-cop chants — while using their definition of justice. So they are telling us they don’t want peace. Now why should we see two groups? (not that there are two)

Like I said in previous posts, the lockstep Left cannot separate themselves from criminals, drug dealers, or even illegal aliens and gangs. And they certainly, to this point, have not stood up to condemn terrorists like Antifa. Yet we are supposed to see a separation that does not exist? It’s all a game to them, that’s all I’m saying.

You cannot separate the two. It is the means to the end. Why should we try when they don’t want them separated? It is all part of their social justice agenda.

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2020

Weaponizing Wicked

Ruling class elites who weaponize government against their political opponents and the people deserve justice in lavish amounts.

When those in power turn their backs to those who stand up to defend our country, and scheme against them, then we are in a bad and wicked way.

We need to start revoking some government pensions. And it should start soon. When they strategically strip people of personal assets and reputations for political gain, they need to pay a high monetary price for it.

And whereas:

Congress can be in session for only 2 days in 3 months…
and after pushing a hoax impeachment!

So how about they give back 1/4th of their salary?
Taxation without Representation comes to mind.

It’s called Government by the people, for the people for a reason.

Right Ring | Bullright

Lockdown Left: The Political Divide

If I had to pick only one story for the week it would be the Lockdown Left.

We all knew it was coming, the day when the economy and things would need to be reopened. Yet at every turn the Democrats seem to want to be stuck in a state of lockdown. Not much incentive or ambition is moving them. Why is that?

Some feel it is the power rush they’ve gotten off this COVID shutdown in the first place. And they are pretty formidable with taking advantage of a crisis for political gain, even if they drag out the economic effects into the election.

I have a new theory about it all. Have you noticed that when one of these major crises comes up, it always seems like it should be a no-brainer? The instinctive reaction is that at least we should all agree on this. But it doesn’t take more than days to see the left emerge to rain on any parade of consensus.

Take any problem you like. China is just a perfect example. You would think we can agree where Coronavirus came from and who is to blame. But no. We cannot talk about China.

How about spying on American citizens? You’d think that would be a hands down consensus. Nope. Turns out the Left likes government spying on citizens because it is legal. They just need the power to do it, never mind how they use it. The purpose for it doesn’t matter, especially if used on their political opponents.

You would think at least there is little partisan about the economy. Turns out almost everything can be politicized and weaponized in the economy. Who knew? Green vs. carbon burners. Workers vs owners of companies. Legal vs illegal workers.

Nurses and doctors can be celebrated as war heroes. But cops not so much. The NYC health commissioner said she doesn’t give a rat’s ass about cops having PPE’s for COVID.
Hospitals can be treated one way, nursing homes treated another. Mass transit workers had an alarming rate of infection and death, but don’t tell the public. Keep it quiet.

Do you think they are incapable of politicizing your healthcare or the healthcare system?

When government decides you are an essential worker, it is their way of saying they like you and what you do. You are “essential.” But if they don’t, look out. And they don’t seem to like barbers and beauticians. In California, they threaten to fine them and cut off their electric and water if they catch barbers working. No cheaters.

Have any major crisis and problem and it will only illustrate the political divide.That shouldn’t be but it tells you what you need to know about the left. They will be on any dissenting side of any good issue for the country. Terrorism, they side with terrorists. Dispute with a tyrannical power in the world; they side with tyranny.

If we want to stop the flood of illegal immigrants or countries from undermining our markets? The Left tells us to “stop being a bully.” That’s empirical talk.

Well, then there is always civil rights to bring us all together. No, selective rights and privileges for selected people. They decide who gets what. And their beloved sanctuary cities tell the federal government to go to hell with enforcing immigration laws.

Well, law and order still needs to be enforced, right? No, not really. Catch and release was a border enforcement problem. Now it seems the same applies to criminals. Arrest them and then turn them back onto the street so they can re-offend and re-victimize people.

See how politics enters the fray on every major thing? A country running on a serious ideological bent is not a very healthy country. But one that can carry out a coup when some people don’t like whom the voters elected is not a very healthy country either.

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2020

Nazi ordered returned to Germany

Former Nazi concentration camp guard living in Tennessee sent back to Germany for decades-old human rights violations

By Vandana Rambaran | Fox News

A Tennessee man who was a former Nazi concentration camp guard during World War II will be sent back to Germany for decades-old human rights violations, a Memphis immigration judge ruled Thursday.

Friedrich Karl Berger worked at the Neuengamme sub-camp near Meppen, Germany, where Nazis imprisoned Jews, Poles, Russians, Danes, Latvians, Italians, and the Dutch and French as well as other political opponents, according to a ruling by U.S. Immigration Judge Rebecca Holt.

Meppen prisoners were held during the winter of 1945 in “atrocious” conditions and were exploited for outdoor forced labor, working “to the point of exhaustion and death.”

Berger admitted to the court during his two-day trial that, as part of his role, he guarded prisoners to prevent them from escaping during their dawn-to-dusk workday and escorted them to and from their worksites.

The Nazis abandoned Meppen in March 1945 after British and Canadian forces advanced on the region. The judge found that Berger helped guard the prisoners during their forcible evacuation to the Neuengamme main camp – a nearly two-week trip under inhumane conditions where nearly 70 prisoners died.

“Berger was part of the SS machinery of oppression that kept concentration camp prisoners in atrocious conditions of confinement,” Assistant Attorney General of the Department of Justice’s criminal division Brian Benczkowski said in a statement. “This ruling shows the Department’s continued commitment to obtaining a measure of justice, however late, for the victims of wartime Nazi persecution.”

https://www.foxnews.com/us/tennessee-man-who-served-as-concentration-camp-guard-during-wwii-ordered-removed-to-germany

Double Standard of Justice

Sara Carter once again nails the double standard of justice in the Swamp. A recent leak case highlighted the serious crime of leaking information to the press.

But scads of Deep State operators get away with leaking. Not even being charged and in some cases go on to get lucrative book deals and media contracts. This leaker gets tried.

Over the past three years it appears there is one set of rules for those with friends in high places and another set of rules for those without. Last year, nearly half a dozen federal employees with the “FBI, DEA, a U.S. attorney and U.S. marshal officials were allowed to retire, do volunteer work, or keep their jobs as they escaped criminal charges that everyday Americans probably would not,” as previously reported at The Hill.

Assistant Attorney General for National Security John C. Demers said Thursday that “Frese violated the trust placed in him by the American people when he disclosed sensitive national security information for personal gain.”

See more at https://saraacarter.com/two-sets-of-rules-dia-employee-charged-with-leaking-while-fbi-leakers-walk-away/

Flashback article: https://thehill.com/opinion/criminal-justice/448383-feds-gone-wild-dojs-stunning-inability-to-prosecute-its-own-bad

Looking for Mr. Good Barr in all the wrong places?

So were those hopes for AG Barr’s pending justice in vain, once again, misplaced or wildly unjustified to begin with? Have we engaged in another game of wait and see only to, in the end, see nothing warranting the long wait? The odds are not good either.

February 15, 2020

Has the Deep State beaten Bill Barr?

By Todd Gregory and Erik Gregory [excerpts]

“Among law-and-order conservatives and defenders of Trump, it was widely hoped that Barr would be an A.G. unintimidated by the Deep State, with the intestinal fortitude to push back against a DOJ corrupted by progressive lawyers and grandiose bureaucrats blinded by their irrational and atavistic hatred for Trump. Perhaps Barr might even mete out long delayed justice to the chief plotters,”…./

“Barr was confirmed on Valentine’s Day 2019. In the year since Barr’s confirmation, conservative stalwarts from Roger Simon to Sean Hannity have sung the praises of Barr and his deputy, John Durham, all but guaranteeing criminal indictments any day now against senior members of the Obama administration (which had spied on Trump’s campaign and colluded with multiple foreign actors to subvert American democracy, both before and after the 2016 election)”…/.

“Skeptical conservative voters were admonished to be patient, and that the likes of Comey, Susan Rice, Loretta Lynch, and Brennan would soon be charged for their crimes and jailed. Yet, amid the frantic waving of pom-poms, something perfectly predictable happened on the way to the Deep State’s day of reckoning. The days turned to into weeks, the weeks into months, and now a full year.”

Read more: https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/02/has_the_deep_state_beaten_bill_barr.html#ixzz6EKVAgIri

Still waiting, and waiting!

Maybe the one thing that will shock the conscience in the end is that there will be no accountability for it all? America that cannot be, can it?

Judgment Call

Time for a judgment call on the state of impeachment sham. That is on the common perceptions of some notable people.

I’m not buying the Andrew McCarthy summation or drinking that juice. He now suggests on Fox that even if you assume the conduct in question happened, it does not rise even close to the level of impeachment.

Then he asserts it is bad behavior etc. or improper but it is not impeachable.

I don’t agree with most of that. Assuming the conduct of what is being described, and that is a stretch, it is not necessarily “bad” conduct. Controversial – yes. But bad? No. It sure is nowhere in the impeachment field. I don’t qualify asking for an investigation or looking into possible corruption as bad or malicious behavior.

Remember, Andrew McCarthy is also the one who stated at the onset of Russia fever that with those accusations there would have been enough grounds to open an investigation and it would bear out innocence. But worth investigating was the verdict.

No, there were not grounds for that investigation. It was a cooked up scheme to force an investigation – and subsequent coup. Now he says, just based on the numerous facts we know, it would be wrong or bad behavior to ask a foreign government to look into it.

Hogwash.

Right Ring | Bullright

Wicked this way comes

If Nancy Peloci uses Unconstitutional means to try to remove a president from office, then that is the same as the coup they have run for 3 years. It is not legal or legitimate.

That brings us right to treason, no matter how glamorous one tries to dress it up.

So just the fact that she tried to step in to further contaminate it by attempting to gain control over the Senate proces, is only more icing on the Unconstitutional cake.

And frankly, Madame Speaker, I’m sick of it! She obviously cares nothing about the Constitution and even less for the people of this country and our election process.

Right Ring | Bullright