Don’t Rock The Woke Boat, Simple Simon Says

The condition of the country and world today, as it is not as we wish it to were, would normally be a great time for evangelizing. That seems like the way it always worked. We called them awakenings, revivals, or God moments.

People do need hope, faith that there is something bigger than the potpourri of devastation we see around us while the country disintegrates from that shiny city on a hill. All is not lost, God is still on His throne and nothing these people do will change that. He is in the capital Pronoun business. That is the message all right.

So if ever there was an appropriate time and need for a message, this would seem to be it. Except for one thing. Where are the people to spread it? I don’t mean just a few or handful of evangelicals telling the great salvation story. Don’t get me wrong, God can work in a few and look what disciples did once they got the hang of it.

But when I look at what many mainline churches are doing, I shake my head. No, this is not a critique of churches……. or is it? I’m not really sure, but the more I see the more I see at least some churches as part of the problem. That hurts me. It bothers me and it makes me feel uncomfortable about some fellow Christians and about the future. No, I don’t want to complain too much here. Wouldn’t be prudent, you know, or productive.

Then maybe that is what is needed? I mean every quadrant of society takes criticism from different sides these days. It is open season on the right folks or groups. Should churches be exempt from criticism? I know people probably don’t want to hear it. After all, churches are supposed to be part of the solution, and they often are, not the problem.

But the same age-old story you would get if you really broaden the scope to look at everything objectively (without inherent biases which seems harder and harder), then you cannot ignore the one stunning thing staring you in the face that does not go away.

That is, as bad as times are for culture and the rest in civil society, it screams to what is responsible for it. You have to admit if churches were doing a better job, then how could things be this bad? That would seem impossible if churches were very effective. So you must draw the conclusion that part of the blame is on the churches. Yes it is people themselves but the church is an organ of God that should stand up for and be doing something. No, this is not about church building for me. It is about being effective.

See if we all must take some of the blame for the way society is — or the country by extension — then churches cannot escape their share of blame either. I believe people are responsible for allowing much of this to happen. We can claim to be victims of it all but we allow it, even if we do not condone it outright. But churches are in that mix, too.

I know, it is an issue/story many people don’t want to hear, aren’t interested in, or don’t care about. I get that. But who can stand up for churches to defend them from blame? I don’t know who can make that case? Maybe I am doing the easy thing by throwing some criticism their way — rather than attempting to defend them.

Sure churches have missions and they do a lot of good. But that is not what I am talking about. When do we start, as people, taking responsibility for the society we live in? And where is the effort to change and fix it? Maybe this is all a cultural indictment and not about the individual. We like to hide behind the individual responsibility thing. But if things are the way they are, what does that say about us all as individuals?

I don’t mean this as a rant, just being serious because we know there are serious consequences to it all. We know that much. Just look at the way Democrats downplay or parse abortion. (most of those politicians) They claim they are personally not for abortions themselves, but they completely endorse having as many as society can provide, even demanding our government pay for it. Abortions on every corner, without limits. Does it make sense? There is a layer of excusing themselves in all that .

Like oh, I don’t personally rob banks or assault people but I will not stand in the way of anyone who does. “It’s their thing.” I don’t light fires, riot and burn down buildings when I am mad at government but I will not condemn the “love summer” of riots, political violence and crime. ‘It’s sometimes necessary.‘ So they stood there and watched cities burn and said nothing about it. They donated to the no bail or arrest cause for those that did it. ‘No, I don’t believe in it but I don’t believe in accountability for it either.’

Only a few classic examples. Where are the churches in all this? Or where are the churches when innocent people are being spied on or targeted for their religious and political beliefs, or for who they voted for? When forced to take a gov’t shot or pill or  else lose their job?  Oh, that’s where they would claim “but separation of church and state.” So we are to stand by to allow this weaponization against people of faith and do nothing?

It is a selective thing to churches as it is to the rest of society. They choose their fights when it is for ‘poor immigrants’ or downtrodden. When it is for standing up for illegals flooding the country through open borders, they are right there with their compassion buckets. But when it is our own citizens being discriminated against or attacked for their faith, they are silent. Show me a left-wing issue like climate change and they are on it.

How is it they can break barriers of a phony “separation” when they feel like it and it’s welcomed by society, too? But if churches stand up for people’s personal belief and faith, that is not acceptable to defend. We have become very accustomed where those lines are,  where they intersect and contradict each other. We accept it. What can we do about it?

So those ‘good’ folks can have charities, organizations, marches and fundraisers to help illegal aliens who broke the country’s laws to get here; but when it comes to those here that need help in hard times, they fall through the cracks. People who are not intentionally and knowingly breaking the law do not make the priority cut. Sorry, just not enough compassion in our tanks for that; but show some more love for illegals. Get with it.

Do you think churches deserve some of the blame for the way things are going? I’m really curious. I don’t see anyone who has made a great defense for the status quo. Am I being a little too hard on blaming Christians and churches? Maybe. But aren’t we supposed to be the salt, not the wine-chaser for everything the world concocts?

Could it be that some of these churches are doing this selective advocacy (I’ll call it) for a reason? Maybe it’s  to keep the finger of blame from pointing at them, by pandering to the world and the woke in one stroke? Just a question. That’s all and I fear that is enough.

 

In Critical Defense:

Someone may say I just want to politicize churches in general, because that’s what liberals always do and say. No, churches have already politicized themselves more than anyone cares to admit. It’s been done. They also follow the lead of some corporations.

And I never said all churches but I don’t have a number. True, some aren’t in that camp.

But for other mainline ones, they advocate political issues much the way some corporations have. So they gladly take positions on gun control, climate change, critical race theory, revising history, BLM, abortion, biological debates, border control, illegal immigration, LGBTQ advocacy, demonstrations, civil disobedience resistance, on crime, police and bail defunding issues, social justice activism, even some union policies.

They also incentivize illegal immigration through their advocacy.
Why does that almost feel sort of like Luther with a list of Theses?

That is to say basically all the hot button issues or controversial ones you commonly hear about. Green and environmental as well, And many of those in official capacities, in missions or raising money. They participate in marches, protests and sometimes have political leaders speak on them. All those are highly politicized issues. So yeah, they’ve become political. But no one points out those contradictions. Strange about that.

(So keep the pews warm… and I’ll leave a light on for you).

Right Ring | Bullright | 2022

Tweety Gives Normies The Bird

Just in story right from Babylon Bee, your best source for fake news.

James Lindsay Sneaks Back On Twitter Disguised As Pedophile Schoolteacher

Internet · Aug 6, 2022 · BabylonBee.com

 

“NEW YORK, NY — This week, cultural critic James Lindsay was suspended from Twitter for persistently criticizing teachers who sexualize small children. Though Twitter announced a permanent ban, Lindsay was able to sneak back on the platform by simply declaring himself an actual teacher who sexualizes small children.

“How do you do, fellow elementary sex-educators??” said Lindsay via his new Twitter persona, Jameson Lindergarten. “Gosh, I sure do love teaching children about my sexuality and helping them find their true pronouns!!”

The new bio from “Mr. Lindergarten” has already earned accolades from the pedophile community, with many applauding his remarkable courage. Initial comments included affirming Tweets from profiles with diverse handles like “@Gr00m_Th3_Kidz,” “@Twerk_4_Teach3r,” and “Don’t_Tell_Mom.”

Twitter is in the process of awarding Lindergarten verification and giving him 300,000 bot followers to help boost his following.

According to Twitter, the concerted effort to remove any criticism of child molesters is already beginning to pay dividends. “We are proud to report that we are already seeing a much more positive, affirming stance towards pedophilia on Twitter,” said spokesman Jim Rapier. “Still, we have to work to do. There are other bigots out there in the mold of James Lindsay who want to make child molesters feel bad. We will not rest until everyone feels safe to sexually indoctrinate young children.”

At publishing time, the Biden administration had announced “Mr. Lindergarten” would receive the “National Teacher of the Year” award, to be presented by Rachel Lavine.”

I love the Babylon

Also: Brittney Griner Rewarded With 9 Years Of Not Hearing The U.S. National Anthem

Call Them Crazy

Just to show you how weird things got now, yesterday I looked on Twitter to find Adam and Steve were trending. You can imagine what that was all about. No longer Adam and Eve, it’s Adam and Steve now. Sadly, it is just one more absurdity.

Last week I heard the LGBTQRST community loves dinosaurs so much they think dinosaurs belong to them, for some uncanny reason. I’m thinking of Jurassic Park in different way. What is it with these people, why do they have to steal everything?

LGBTQs appropriated the rainbow to symbolize their sexual identity groups. Any other meaning is officially abolished. And dinosaurs belong to them, too. Why do they need to possess everything they like? It seems like some kind of obsessive compulsive disorder.

That would be akin to someone walking through a beautiful garden and stealing a bunch of flowers saying, “they are mine now.” Then merrily skipping home with their loot.

But Adam and Steve? That’s creative. Can anyone tell me which one took the first bite out of the apple? I’m dying to know. Adam’s ribs created Steve? How wonderful, for what may I ask? Now I’m curious where that story leads?

Not to be outdone, Al Gore comes out to compare “climate change deniers” to cops in Uvalde, who stood there for over an hour instead of engaging the shooter. I really think the guy has his analogies mixed up.

Maybe he and the rest of his authoritarian leftists ought to stop trying to hold us hostage to their emotional climate schemes. The guy needs his own electric grid just for himself.

But really he’s like a squirrel with one nut lodged in his mouth and another stuck in his ass. Who did Al Gore ever save from anything?

What needs to be engaged is people like Gore trying to bamboozle society on the basis of some religious fanaticism. He said it should not be political? The left hyper-politicized it and built golden idols to it. Now they want us to acknowledge it (climate) as a god. And if you don’t agree with them, they will burn you at the stake — metaphorically of course, at least for now. They just can’t leave people alone.

Then the denizen of crazy in California, Gavin Newsom, decided to walk on the political waters by running an ad to attack Florida and Gov DeSantis. So he attacks him on freedom and education. The crackdown governor must have got a hold of Hunter’s crack pipe. He says, come to California to enjoy liberty. (even as people are fleeing Cali) He gets a WH award for innovation in education. Self-serving hat tip from teachers’ unions.

But that is the idea to reframe everything as if they are the one’s trying to save freedom. Right on cue, Democrats are now the ones defending and supporting police. Yeah, right. They are also the ones fighting crime, too. Where do they get such nonsense?

Dems just make it up and hope people will believe it and forget the 550 riots in 2020, while they literally stood there and did nothing as buildings burned, police stations were attacked and cops murdered. All for some narrative everyone knows is a lie. Democrats donated to Marxist thugs’ bail fund, and our VP said they should never stop.

Democrats supported these commie thugs. And now they stand back and defend rogue DA’s  across the country that are destroying communities from inside out and top down. But Democrats are anti-crime, don’t you know?

Oh and Dems also supported the abolish the cops movement, which they rebranded as defunding police to make it more palatable. Of course now they deny supporting that movement. They are all about funding police now…. or so they say. When is enough with all this bullshit craziness?

But remember education was such a catastrophe in the pandemic with all the teachers’ unions supporting lock-downs and shutdowns of our public schools. That went well. You know Biden was fully behind that because, as he says, he sleeps with the teachers’ unions.

Just look at education now. The state of education today only tells us what the education of the State really is. That education says it is for public safety to shutdown schools or lock-down society. It’s for the good!

I’ve pretty much had it with Leftist radicals calling us the crazies. It’s not working. Makes our isle of common sense into paradise.

So look out for swaggering Libtards: worse than zombies, more dangerous than vampires. They appear out of nowhere because that’s where they belong.

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2022

Neil Oliver On GBN Calling A Spade A Spade

On July 9th, Neil Oliver of the Britain news agency unloaded a great commentary. You can read it here, but I expect the video (below) will be available later.

Neil Oliver – GBN  (excerpt)

“At some point in the past the governing class decided they were done with serving us and that they own us and rule us instead”

“The world is in a time of food insecurity and still governments would apparently prefer to contemplate a future in which people will suffer in every conceivable way. And in the future presently shaping up, people will most definitely suffer. Those governments are plainly not in the business of fixing anything, rather making matters worse.

Canadian PM Justin Trudeau – he that forcibly shut down the truckers’ protest in his own county and seized their bank accounts – has his country on a similar path to that of the Dutch. In a time of global food insecurity – blamed in part on war in Ukraine – ideologically driven administrations are stamping their metaphorical boots down upon their farmers’ backs.

In Holland, shots have been fired – allegedly by police, at one tractor. This is how basic things are becoming, how near the bone. Here in the west, in the 21st century, we are being prepared not just for a future without cars, but a future of less energy… less warmth… and even less food.

I knew there was something badly wrong with all that’s going on when I realised my response to what was happening, to all that we were being told, was physical. All of this actually makes me feel ill, to my bones. I have never in my life before listened to government policy – and to the policies of governments all around the world – and felt endangered. But I do now. If you feel that too – a deep physiological response to the last two years, and a growing sense of something malevolent – then you are not alone. Sometimes it feels like society itself has been poisoned – and that all that society is being offered is yet more poisonous nonsense.

We should notice that it is from among us, the ordinary people, that the farmers and the truckers come – so that it is we who really have the power that matters in the end.”

Eulogy To Roe V. Wade

Today, June 24, 2022, Roe V. Wade died after a torturous yet productive life. Roe was imagined and born in a cloakroom of the Supreme Court on January 22, 1973, by a 7-2 decision. Just as her life began there, it also ended there almost 50 years later.

She is survived by a variety of anonymous offspring who declined to comment. Her alias was ‘reproductive rights’ but often operated under the pseudonym of Healthcare. Socially ahead of the times, she identified as a law. Preferred pronouns: me, my, mine.

But for those 50 years she lived large in society, clinics, side streets in neighborhoods and the minds of the American people. She was a force to be reckoned with. Nearly every Supreme Court nominee — or federal judge — was forced to swear on the altar of Roe Wade to protect her ceremonious existence, marinated in estrogen.

She led a religious cult and following; and was nicknamed the ‘sanctity of death’ among critics. However, far from leading a healthy life, she created a toxic environment that ushered evil into every faucet of society masquerading as constitutional legitimacy.

In early life, she established many clinics and offices dedicated to her posterity in low-income and minority neighborhoods under her cousin’s name, Planned Parenthood. The two held various common interests. They were a dynamic duo of power and agendas.

Over recent years, Roe’s own health worsened though some thought her immortal. She had been privately on life support for a while. In finalizing her existence, 5 Justices decided to pull the plug. While the Chief Justice concurred, he instead preferred removing all treatment and judicial sustenance necessary, leaving her to slow yet fatal expiration.

The decision won out, Roe Wade was humanely put out of suffering to the protest of her cult following. The fallout of which is bound to be felt on streets across America.

Ironically, this did not end all the suffering and misery she caused over a 50 year reign. She helped lead a deviant legacy of debauchery across the country. Over 60 million babies were killed as a result of her half-century existence. Roe was very politically active for being terminally diseased. Her fiercest enemy was Personhood.

“Roe v. Wade caused a 4.5% decline in births in states that had not previously legalized abortion. ” – a simple byline in Wikipedia  sums up her legacy.

Despite her wild successes, she was never accepted by a large population in America. Roe was illegitimate and created under false pretenses — the very kind of social ills and illegalities she proposed to exterminate across America.

Finally, the powers that be knew the only viable option to save  Roe Wade was through a formal codification in Congress, which never came to save her demise. But that did not slow her down. Her death count rivaled the Holocaust and Stalin’s and Mao’s evil.

Sadly for her, she had no conscience — born that way. She was billed as the solution to all cultural problems. Her life estate was quite extensive. Roe held sufficient layers of control over all power and leaders in the country. Still Roe was terminally flawed from creation.

Though Roe V. Wade is now gone, the process of abortion she enshrined will live on without its flamboyant maître d’of evil, and living large in the minds of her adherents.

Unfortunately, she falsely altered the minds of most of the cult. She could do no wrong nor ever die,  even though evil was her raison d’être.

America has been grieving the Roe Wade decision, both politically and socially, for almost 50 years. May she now rest in peace because she didn’t offer any here.

Now a moment of silence for “Roe V Wade is the law of the land.

Ceremonies to be held across the land.

[*^Correction: I initially said 6-3 decision but was corrected, 5-4.]

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2022

Schumer’s Whirlwind Shows Up

Remember when Senator Schumer attacked and threatened the Supreme Court Justices, calling out Kavanaugh and Gorsuch by name at a rally outside the Court?

“I want to tell you Gorsuch, I wanna tell you Kavanaugh: You have released the whirlwinds and you will pay the price. You won’t know what hit you….. if you go through with these awful decisions!”

One of Schumer’s whirlwinds showed up at Justice Kavanaugh’s home early Wednesday, prepared to assassinate Kavanaugh and possibly his family. He was arrested.

Just tell them Schumer sent you, that ought to take of it. No harm no foul.  Schumer was silent Wednesday and Mitch McConnell relayed the story in the Senate.

And Away Goes Roe … potentially

Leftists outraged over news that the Supreme Court may be poised to overturn Roe v. Wade: ‘This decision is a direct assault on the dignity, rights, & lives of women’

The Blaze  News

Leftists are sounding the alarm over news that the U.S. Supreme Court could potentially be poised to overturn the landmark Roe v. Wade abortion ruling when it issues a decision in a case regarding a Mississippi pro-life law.

Politico published a draft majority opinion by Justice Samuel Alito which declares that the high court intends to overturn Roe and another decision — but nothing has been officially decided since the document is just a draft opinion, not an official ruling of the court.

“Abortion presents a profound moral question. The Constitution does not prohibit the citizens of each State from regulating or prohibiting abortion. Roe and Casey arrogated that authority. We now overrule those decisions and return that authority to the people and their elected representatives,” the draft opinion states.

 

MORE: https://www.theblaze.com/news/supreme-court-leftists-roe-wade

Source: https://www.politico.com/news/2022/05/02/supreme-court-abortion-draft-opinion-00029473

 

But

So in other words: The same people outraged about a SCOTUS draft think you choose your gender(or create one), call science undeniable, believe in birthing persons, endorse men competing in women’s sports, and want transgender theory in K-4. Just saying…

The leaker? It’s already been labeled an insurrection, legitimately.
Allow me define it: this is Institutional Terrorism.

Ode To Big Bad Neil Young

Mr big and powerful Neil Young,

Forces people to choose

Between himself and someone else.

Don’t let common sense get in his way.

 

Seemed like a stupid thing to do, to me

But what do I know; I was only one of his fans.

Guess the lesson here is you can’t have it all.

You can have one but you can’t have both,

And Neil gets to decide which one you get?

That’s just not a choice for me.

 

Poor Mr Choice, you ain’t mine.

Can’t you see you’re just no good for me?

 

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2022

Don’t Ask Dems To Explain Anything

My hand told my brain it was time to write something. Well, technically my finger told my arm and it told my brain. That is the way it works. Isn’t it?

If that sounds strange, you aren’t alone. It would seem backwards or upside down and it doesn’t make much sense in a rational way.

With all the serious problems around us that we can’t ignore, there is even something worse yet. It is the tediously obnoxious explanations we get for those problems from Democrats or Leftist drones.

So I boiled it all down to one basic analogy of their excellent explanations to our real serious problems. Enjoy.

Suppose your knee hurts and you go to the doctor. You tell him “my knee hurts, doctor. I want to know if it is something serious, so could you tell me what is causing it?”

He or she says sure and examines it. He says “it is hurting because you are walking on it. Apparently you expect it not to hurt but it only hurts you because you think it does. You perceive it hurts and so it bothers you. Your perception is more the problem.”

You: “no, but what can I do about it?”

He suggests “stop letting it bother you so much, just stop thinking about it. If you stop listening, it will stop complaining so much.”

You say “I’ve been ignoring it a while but that hasn’t helped. Now it won’t let me walk or even sleep anymore. So that’s why I came to see you.”

Doctor: “look, ultimately your knee only hurts because you have one, right? I mean your knee could not hurt if you didn’t have one, correct? It obviously couldn’t hurt you then. So just be thankful you still have a knee. And be happy if it hurts which only confirms it is still there. …

“Now suck it up and work on those expectations, a lot.”

Then suppose every other doctor sounded as wacky as that one. That is crazy. But they all tell you this crap with a straight face knowing full well none of it is true or right. Who really cares anyway? Yet it is what they decided the answer should be regardless of what the problem is.

There is the perfectly illogical mindset of the Left. It has all been adequately explained because they say it and spoke it into existence. So it therefore only becomes a problem if you don’t accept their crazy explanations.

 

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2021

US Congress Condemned Satire: Manufactured Outrage

News Alert: Satire is censured in the House but direct threats on Americans, from their government, can continue unabated.

Not to worry, people, on this historic day your beloved Congress – led by aggrieved Democrat ideologues — voted to sanctimoniously censure satire from a sitting Congressman.  He was also stripped from two committees.

You have been saved and spared all the shame of Rep Paul Gosar.

Ticket-tape parade surely to follow. And they did it by utilizing their proxy-voting process — aka Nancy’s rule — which allows members of Congress not  to even show up in Congress to vote their venom. They can phone it in.

Hatred and violence is on the docket to condemn, with as nasty a brush as Democrats could muster.  We must stop this symbolic violence in society. No place for it to fester in Congress. (shout out to condemning Rep Joe Wilson for yelling lie during a SOTUS – same condemnation deserved)

Nope, it belongs on a ball field where Republicans were corralled so their shooter could target them one by one, like fish in a bowl. The Democrat activist got off as many rounds as he could before security took him down. His objective was killing them all — particularly ones on his pocket list.

Or perhaps save the worst violence for when members are mowing their own lawn to be attacked by a crazed Democrat, leaving him permanently injured. That’s the way the game is played. No satire involved.

Then the Democrats can cheer as reports flow about another injured Republican wounded while unscrupulously serving in Congress. It doesn’t really matter where Republicans are attacked just as long as they are.

 

While on the same day as their historic and sanctimonious vote, another rapper called Young Dolf was gunned down walking into a cookie store in Memphis. Any drama symbolism the event had was overshadowed by the very real death of a 36-year old rapper. BLM took a rain check on that.

But the outrage for that, or for the riots and violence last year to further the Democrats’ objectives, is completely omitted from memory. Silence is the Democrats’ deadly weapon of choice. See no evil, speak no evil. It was over a billion in damages but so what? It stirs the passion for cop killings to follow – a necessary ingredient. It further fueled the abolish cops theme which morphed into defunding police across the country.

Yes, Democrats needed to get behind the BLM and donate to bail funds to secure rioters’ and looters’ freedom in 2020. Politics trumps insurrection.

Democrats in Congress have a strange way of picking good duys and bad guys. Like their silence and denial when parents of school children are labeled domestic terrorists. It comes with the political  territory. When they are targeted by the DOJ all the better, because that is what the InJustice Department is there for —  to retaliate against Democrats’ political enemies.

But real violence and threats against the Homeland are ignored and denied as some wild “conspiracy theories” – cooked up by devious patriots trying to protect America. How dare they?

So millions of illegals storm the border but Democrats’ only response is to supply the logistics necessary to get them where they want to go. Busloads of invaders circumventing ‘rule of law’ are given priority over law-abiding citizens and Americans. Special rights are awarded illegal aliens to trump Americans’ genuine concerns for security. Thankfully so.

But don’t you worry your crazy head, be comforted that on this day Congress took a tough stand censuring satire by a vote in the House. They are rising to the challenge of manufactured outrage, threat numero uno.

Memes are out and violence is in, to Democrats.

 

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2021

Wacky Media Theorizing

Time for some wacky media theory talk. 25 years ago Fox kicked off a news network that broke the mold of the news media business model. Against all the odds it worked.

Okay, it was an achievement and people liked it. The popularity even caused a hate from the left, which was weird because you would think liberals would like more news instead of less. It seemed to fire up their hate machine on all cylinders. Leftists couldn’t really hate on legacy media because they shared the same political views.

Now hate for Fox is standard fair.

But whenever you get something new, even if it is an offshoot of something else, sooner or later it too gets dated.

Then, after Fox News proved there could be viable alternatives, it led to others like OAN and Newsmax. Now there are a bunch of them. Oh, you could say they aren’t really mainstream yet. But Fox is because it now leads in ratings. Fox proved you could also succeed in being an alternative network – or beat them at their own game.

Now that that is done, what is new on the horizon? I already mentioned the other alternate news networks. They are gaining fast. And meanwhile less and less people really believe what mainstream legacy media is telling us. It’s a caricature.

What is the future? Well we have to look at what happened and say that eventually someone will come along to replace and further what Fox has done, it’s only natural. What would it be is yet unknown. But we do know people tire of things. After 25 years, they aren’t new anymore. But people will flock to try something new if given the chance.

We’ve seen this pattern in social media, too. Who remembers MySpace? It was all the rage when Obama first ran. Young people probably don’t even know about it, but it was young people then who drove the platform. They know Facebook though. Interesting how the negativity for Facebook has turned into a hatefest. Do you think they survive it?

Mark Zuckerberg has now given us the answer. Change the name. But the fascinating thing under the hood of public opinion is that the Facebook hate is across the spectrum now. It doesn’t matter if they are on the far left or right, or in the middle, everyone agrees on a disdain for Facebook. They certainly don’t trust it either.

So Zuckerberg seems to have a challenge, especially after trying to monopolize so many other social media platforms. His own mother ship brand is in the toilet. No one is more responsible for it than Mark Zuckerberg. Out with the old, in with the new. That time always comes, eventually. At some point, interest fades and/or something else replaces it. Facebook now just wants to remain relevant.

This presents sort of a pattern for the rest of media.

Legacy media is dug in though. There was a time when CNN was the new thing in the 90’s. It rode a popular wave for a while but the wheels came off and it crashed as a leading source. It is no more than an organ for the Democrat machine, credibility is shot. It had its time in the day though. They haven’t decided on changes there yet. But it cannot stand, as people don’t trust them.

No one trusts Facebook either but they didn’t have to. It was only a platform for people to use. Their paradigm has issues now and people refuse to participate in it. They aren’t spending time on it.

I’m saying the same thing will probably, inevitably, happen in the news business too. But it will have to be a different model than we see to be well received. We’re all jaded now; we’ve seen how it works, the good and the bad. We’ve seen where it leads. So it also becomes harder to build a new model with any integrity while there is so much venomous dislike for the old model.

One natural resource we still have in America is creativity. When you have something that people don’t like, there is a hunger for something different. Someone somewhere will find out what that is. It might take several attempts but something comes in the end.

Mark Zuckerberg had to know that day would come when it would be irrelevant, didn’t he? He should have. And he should have planned accordingly. All he managed to do is gobble up anything out there which might be a threat to his monopolistic existence. But Facebook was the business model for all else he hoarded.

That business model now has serious issues. It’s been undermined by people’s lack of trust in it. You can’t keep feeding people poison after they discovered it is poison. That demands deception. Heaping on more new poison is not the answer.

Next up, the jury is still deliberating on Twitter. Jack Dorsey may be despised, for a lot of reasons, but the hate has not spread to both ends of the spectrum yet. So far it is mostly from the right. The left still sees it as politically useful – and they let you know it. In fact, they swarm it like killer bees. It’s a vehicle for cancel culture. It’s useful to attack their political opponents. It’s a preferred platform for leftist hatred.

But that too has its shelf life. Whatever the next thing is, liberals will flock to it like wild boars, they always do. That also makes it harder to start up anything new when the liberals come in scorched earth to destroy anything in their way. That is another pattern we’ve seen over and over again over years. They also don’t develop new; they just want to destroy the old. They wait for others to start it and pounce.

Who knows what the next thing will be or what the future will be? But we do know the sequence of events. The left wants to control it, whatever it is. They want to control us as well as our ability to organize or participate. We can count on those factors.

Meanwhile, Trump announced a collaborative media project to create a new platform. Will it succeed? It will have the name brand and recognition to kick it off – something others only dream of. The left has helped by banning Trump on other media platforms. It created a need for them to go elsewhere. The left never realized it was us who created the attraction for social media platforms. Without that it was only homogenized liberal waste water – an elitist echo chamber, another organ of the Democrat machine.

Whatever is new lies ahead, But what is old will not be forgotten, nor are the lessons learned.

Zuckerberg is already gleaning for what is new that he can use to rehabilitate “Facebook”. He blew it on the new name right out of the gate, Meta. (logo is even worse) No one on the spectrum likes it. Most think it is sounds stupid. He managed to unify hatred of himself, something people would have thought hard to do.

I know, maybe he can use Joey to gain interest in his platform? Maybe he can use has-beens like Obama to help sell his new image? He can say, “hey, we are re-imagining Facebook.” That ought to work. Notice a pattern?

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2021

Repeal, Rewrite History

Friends, Romans and fellow racists (apparently the latter is quite a large audience): this outrage of the day comes from Virginia. Sponsored by Moon Pie Enterprises.( fictional co)

Today they removed a statue of Robert E Lee in Richmond. Governor Blackface (aka Ralph Northam) commented, quite proudly, that they are finally ending this brutal 402-year history. (Not quite an exact quote)

What history is he talking about? The one they are rewriting? Are they repealing the civil war, too? And what 402 years? (Hmmm 1619) I think we know what he is talking about, which only twisted minds could concoct – but it’s the audience he is speaking to.

Now that it is done, with all the ceremonial trappings, they have somehow saved America for the future from the past. But who will save us from them? And when?

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2021

Aliens Among Us

No, not those kind. It’s astonishing how in 2021, with all our advances in society and technology that we could end up looking at a large chunk of our fellow countrymen and yet have to ask the probative question: “who are these people?”

But that is a serious question. I don’t think we would have had to raise that in the past. So much for shared purposes, values or goals. To add more injury, they don’t care.

Who in the hell are these people? What do they want? Why are they so miserable and irreconcilable? We basically know maybe not exactly who but what they are. They have thrown in their support not behind any national identity but a foreign identity to what this country stood for. Their goal is to jettison that nationality.

And now they have become so married to this foreign identity that we can hardly recognize them. All this disassociation is a radical goal. They are hell bent on disconnecting all social mores of America and civil society. None of that matters at all.

They proudly demonstrate what they are but who is still a question. So they are defined by ideology not by their individuality. How can you have any shared goals or values with that?

And that is the point. It is as if they think deconstructing our country, and subsequently society, is some kind of art form — a sophisticated parlance of chaotic demolition.

 

“Strange days indeed” – John Lennon, “Nobody Told Me”…. ‘there’d be days like these.”

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2021

Defining Times And Terms

It is never just the words Democrats (aka Leftists) use that are the real problem, but the definitions they apply to them that do the damage. So when you follow the Left’s definitions, strange things happen like the world turning inside out and upside down at the same time. Crazy stuff materializes out of the blue.

But in politics, there is a rule that you define your opponent before he/she can. It is all about defining your enemy. That was always the rule. Now something even better has happened. The Left has defined itself, all by itself, and it is not a good brand. So why shouldn’t we run on their own definitions of terms?

For example, all this mess everywhere – sorry I won’t list all the details – is their definition of great leadership. The other day I was reading where they called their evacuation plans in Afghanistan historical and making great progress. That is progress? Do you see what their definitions of terms look like? It is appalling.

“America is back.” There is a keeper. Then you look at what that means. OPEC is back in control, with the US back to relying on foreign energy sources. Open borders. They call a bill the For The People Act that only protects incumbent Democrats. It enshrines Democrats’ power, and then they can call destroying democracy “saving democracy.”

More definitions? Just look around, there are plenty because they love to define things. They defined failure as achievement. They say they are “making progress” on the border. Immigration is a declaration of citizenship — not a Constitutional process.

They have made justice for all into a two-tier justice system – one for them and one for others. But then they want praise for having brought “integrity” back into the system. I know these are grand terms and ideas but they are their own definitions of them.

A new green deal –  socialist spending, corruption and lies – is supposed to save the planet. Who knew you would save the world with fascist corruption? And without it, the world will die a speedy death in 7 or so years, as best they can figure. Give us lies to save the day and all of humanity. More lies, more salvation. Ideology is now science.

Abolishing police is the answer to crime. So then defunding police should also go a long way to cutting crime, significantly. That will cause the attrition of cops necessary to the real goal of abolishing police. Police are the problem not the solution. Anarchy is the solution.

Social workers can be the best law enforcement and just what America needs. The new police are the social workers. Put them in the center of domestic disputes and, guaranteed, only good things can happen from that. No need to be armed.

Get rid of ICE because if we don’t believe in borders then we don’t need any customs enforcement or immigration enforcement. Give that budget money to immigrants.

So don’t charge the criminals and then watch those crime rates go down. It’s magic I tell you. It is all in their definitions. If we can control climate, we can control crime rates.

The best one is the way they define reform. So reforming justice means less justice for people. And it will help those troubling statistics too. It’s all good.

 

How about redefining the word good by anything bad? How about calling failure success? How about calling corruption reform? How about defining everything you are opposed to as racism? How about making discrimination the law of the land? Call opposing it Jim Crow.

So when they say “law of the land” they mean discrimination and abortion. See, they have done a lot with their definitions of things. Now it is up to us just to show their definitions. Let’s call killing a baby “reproductive choice.” Shall we call it a right not a crime?

Lets subsidize institutions that promote reproductive choice (abortion) with tax dollars. And let’s put that right over and above religious liberty or speech. Let’s call freedom of speech “hate speech.” Let’s call government’s wasteful spending “investment.”

Let’s call concealing government information “transparency.”

How about screw all the white papers and campaign plans and platforms, just run on the Left’s definitions — against them. Run on their definition of leadership. Run on what their “success” means – losing and surrender. Run on what their definition of racism is. Run on their definition of prosperity. There is a lot to run on.

One of the basics in contract–making and negotiation (deal making) is defining the terms. But fortunately, Democrats have defined the terms already so we all know what they are talking about. They simplified the matter for us. Now all we have to do is use their terms as they defined. Run on their terms.

Joe offered another good one. He says America is back. So this is what America looked like? No it never did. He said from the onset of his campaign that he was fighting to restore the soul of the country. But he is not, he is replacing it with something foreign. This was never the heart and soul of the country. Just look at their definitions. Listen to him. It’s gold.

Incidentally, build back better is another defined term. It means backwards. It means undo progress, independence and prosperity. It means serfdom, birth to death.

Barrack Obama used to talk a lot about fair share. But now we know what their idea of fair share is. It is confiscating as much as they want from you until the point you can’t take it anymore, you’re broke, or they stop. (which of those is going to happen?)

We now know their definition of private and public partnership. It means private sector companies working for them, and doing what government itself is not allowed to do.

We often blame the Left for being vague, and they intentionally are, but we can take them at their definitions of their own terms. They’ve been extremely busy defining them.

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2021

In Pursuit Of Life, Liberty And Happiness

It’s amazing that so much can happen over a couple decades. For instance Big Tech grew up and became Big Government. But it kept all its childhood protections.

Jen Psaki told us right from the WH press room that yes, they were in regular contact with Facebook and flagged many posts for FB action. Facebook also admits going out its way to accomplish WH objectives removing content. Psaki called it misinformation.

No, it’s about votes as it always is with Democrats. It’s all about political power, to use it and abuse it. The WH said it is concerned about the numbers of unvaccinated. Then they propose a vaccination drive to knock on some doors.  .

The next day reports of Democrat political organizers surfaced in Virginia knocking on doors. Who else would they enlist but political organizers, the same people who get out the vote?  Is everything about electioneering to Democrats? The simple answer is yes.

Jen Psaki also declared misinformation public enemy number one. Actually people’s voices are the enemy. They need to use their Facebook Fascist friends to ferret out their enemies. And they gladly comply.

So anything Biden’s administration doesn’t like or agree with is labeled misinformation and gets put in the hopper. Now its over COVID, or what they admitted to so far, but it could be applied to anything. And it will be, just call it misinformation..

Notice how every once in a while Democrats will come right out and tell you what they are doing? And when they do no one cares. Media sighs.

 

How sinister that the Left want to create a narrative about suppressing votes. The real story is Democrats want to suppress speech, the First Amend and literally their opponents. Their agenda is broad and drastic: to suppress life, liberty and pursuit of happiness.

The Abortion party suppresses life and liberty everyday. They don’t just suspend they terminate it. End of the problem.

But it is the votes stupid. They care about votes more than life. Actually, it is not really votes they care about; it is the power they extort from them. Or the power they can use against their political enemies. And the power to concentrate and keep that power.

The same power they use in the abortion industry over life. Have you ever seen people more anti-life than Democrats, or more power hungry?

Big Tech and Planned Parenthood, two of Democrats’ greatest empowered lobbies. Censoring speech and canceling life of, by and for government’s favor.

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2021

Hippy-Sippy Government Says

The government is not good at fighting culture wars. They don’t make good cultural warriors, to whom it concerns. But that doesn’t seem to matter.

Imagine if back in the 60’s the government was promoting bell-bottom jeans and tie-die shirts. I think things would have turned out differently. Suddenly people would not want bell-bottoms if “the man” said you had to wear them.

Americans have had a revolutionary nature to big government dictates, at least historically. They tend to rebel against socio-politco mandates from on high. In fact that is what the bell-bottom craze was all about. It was counter culture as the “new mother nature taking over.” Get aboard.

But create a new government mandate and see how people respond? Imagine if they said, again in the 60’s, that all men should grow their hair as long as possible or that it would subsidize anyone getting tattooed. Imagine what would have happened? If government said people should “drop out and turn on” to LSD, it could have launched the beginning of the end of psychedelics.

And the people, at some point along that experiment, would have probably decided, “government is not really your friend.” Right, the government is not your big brother and is not always looking out for your best interests. But just imagine if people fell for such nonsense like government as the great trendsetter? Then, ultimately, it could also decide who lives and dies. Sooner or later people would have woken up and said it was nonsense.

So we don’t expect government to have our best interests at its heart. In fact there is certain inherent distrust for government on that cultural and socio-politico level. And we already know it doesn’t work. So why would we want that?

Actually we don’t, really. But that would be news to some who now think government mandates are the best. And it has the time and resources to come up with all sorts of dictates, in all kinds of places, like the new green deal. Yes they can and they will.

Do people follow along with all these dictates like puppies? Is that the way this works? Try explaining that to woke leftists. I say all that to suggest this is exactly what is happening.

Government is the great trendsetter and cultural warrior. It determines our culture and even battles within it. We are to follow along and accept it as the great Ayatollah of culture. Put it at the head of the proverbial family, too, so it controls everything in the culture, or aspires to – free rein for government supreme. Speech, style, terms — it has it all.

It has an army of brownshirts to facilitate and enforce its mandates. Some are quite happy about that and think it should. Many of these starry-eyed utopians are former rebels of the sixties. How did that happen? Now gubmint is their boss.

Suddenly everything the government does is good and for good reasons. They are giving a moral accreditation to government it never had, in areas it should not have control over. But the hard line leftists, who include most of Democrats’ Party, now think it is justified because they control the entire apparatus.

We also took government from the distrusted phase to the ultimate culture guru. They applied a moral component it never had, with morality controls it should never have down to individual liberty and lifestyle, what you eat. This morality is most concerning.

But meanwhile, the real truth behind the curtain is this new government morality lies, cheats and steals to achieve its ugly ends. (look what it did in over the last 5 years with Trump and people opposing it) It has license to do whatever it wants with no oversight to stop it. Surveillance to rigging elections, no bounds. And “seven ways to Sunday…”

Don’t like who is getting elected? Oppose and stop them. Use intelligence for political purposes. Lie to do it all, then lie and cheat to cover it up. But remember, there is no controlling legal authority to prevent it. That is the way the system works.

The Left is fine with all that. In fact they demand more of it; more covert action, more control from on high. Do it all while aligning itself with media, big tech and institutions to carry out its collective, ideological desires. And the best part is that no one is ever held accountable. So that trendsetting, cultural behemoth now wants us to be ashamed of America’s history. It’s the cool thing, kids, so tell all your friends.

Just to prove the point, we see leftists take to the streets to march and Democrat pols show up to lead the parade. The leftists inside the government now protest against it. So liberals, progressives, socialists and commies of all stripes, this is your utopia.

The counterculture is now the moral majority but don’t tell them that, it might scare them and ignite their microaggression sensitivities. It could short-circuit the entire thing.

Right on schedule, Al Sharpton’s race circus went to consult the White House. Sharpton said this will blossom into a summer of protest, to get back into the streets. (did they ever leave?) The full cooperation and alliance with the administration is clear. No separation between them. Government is leading the culture war. “More Kool-Aid, please.”

 

(*I think I hear echoes of the 5th Dimension’s Age of Aquarius and, as Jagger said, it’s a “Bitch.”  Those “minds to liberation” are taking a nice, long hiatus now.)

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2021

Culture-Phobia Is The Problem

I’ll go back to expound on my favorite topic in politics, the culture war. I don’t know how many believe like I do the tie between the two is clear? It is not an old conspiracy theory.

But many Republicans in and out of office suffer from culture-phobia. For whatever reasons, they are horrified about weighing in on that or taking it on in any way. The rest of the public is not with them on that, which should tell them something.

I have explained that all here before. Any idea still out there that Republicans can stick to fiscal issues, national debt and security is blissful Neanderthal thinking.

We need to be more like Pat Buchanan than Steve Forbes. The culture has become a part of the battlefield. Days of sterile, exclusive political environments are long gone. It’s why Trump succeeded. People say it is divisive and controversial but that is the point. Like it or not, we have to deal with culture.  It is as critical to our country as any external threat.

For instance, one of the top issues is schools. No, it is not a matter of bottom lines and budgets anymore. When everything is political and politicized on the Left, we have to fight that battle or lose the country. It is not a social media thing either but social media is emblematic of the larger problem, everything.

A perfect example of this is JD Vance running to replace Rob Portman in Ohio. No one represents that old Republican mentality better than Portman and he saw the writing on the wall. We don’t need another Rob Portman. He is the past.

When cops, race, justice, schools, borders, security, the climate and energy are all politicized what is the point in denying it as if it were some social niche?

Yes, they came for the Christians before, because we stood in their way, and now they have come for everyone else. We are all their political targets now, and so is the environment and culture we live in. Every thing is at stake along with the country.

Another example: when did it become so fashionably cool to hate America? I know there have been fringe elements for decades carrying a hate America banner, but it was not the maninstream like now. Polls show it is thriving on hate, racism, divisions and anarchy.

The anti-America culture now is real and thriving. It wants any semblance of America gone and replaced. American overhaul. (reality TV show anyone?) Of course they are not as clear on  what would replace the country’s foundation as about tearing down or fomenting hate against the present one. But we know what that evil is. And it is deadly intentional.

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2021

New Pride Definitions

Turns out pride doesn’t mean what you thought it meant. It merely supersedes and bans all other forms of pride.

But culture and media does not like to take second fiddle to anyone. To prove this, NPR released a tweet on their new pride piece:

“Not sure how to ask someone their pronouns? Or confused about what different gender terms mean? We put together a 101 guide to common terms about gender identity, how to talk about gender respectfully — and why it matters ” https://trib.al/Ytgls4P  Jun 2, 2021

Yes, asking someone about ‘their’ choice of pronouns has always been a difficult issue for me. I don’t know about you? I hate that.

NPR “Issues of equality and acceptance of transgender and nonbinary people — along with challenges to their rights have become a major topic in the headlines. These issues can involve words and ideas and identities that are new to some.

That’s why we’ve put together a glossary of terms relating to gender identity. Our goal is to help people communicate accurately and respectfully with one another.”

Is that really your goal? It goes on to say their guide is not exhaustive. But it couldn’t be because these terms keep evolving. A new one will come out about every six months just to keep you on your toes, and give the perpetual Woke brand new terms. It is meant to go on and on.

The whole idea is to keep the people as confused about gender identity as science should be in determining it. There are no rules, no limits, only desire. All other factors need not apply. 

 

All or nothing, and everything in between.

But if you thought this little experiment or lesson is about what you should call it, the real lesson here is what you should not say. Or, in other words, they get to invent new terms or social norms every day which render your terminology and opinions obsolete.

Everyone is expected to adapt to their slide rule of gender. Sorry, that is the way it works. Your language and speech shall be limited while theirs is unlimited. You thought there were ground rules for all this? Too bad.

“One thing to note: Language changes. Some of the terms now in common usage are different from those used in the past to describe similar ideas, identities and experiences. Some people may continue to use terms that are less commonly used now to describe themselves, and some people may use different terms entirely. What’s important is recognizing and respecting people as individuals.”

 

Indeed language changes. So does culture change, as I’ve said before. But what happens without some basic common definitions?

According to the comments, it seems the main purpose was trolling for criticism so they could scream “transphobia” or something at critics. That means I am phobic or hateful while they need to be treated with the utmost respect. See how this works?

This of course requires that other, older social norms be disposed of, if they were ever proper ones in the first place. Follow along: so if everything before now was only a lie, then their new revision must unequivocally be the truth. Make sense?

Personally, I take my gender identity with a side order of reality.

 

How’s That Working Out For You?

The Washington dreams and Socialist schemes, as Sen Time Scott called them, are very alive and not a figment of imagination. They are rolling out across America aimed at us. Joe is the active face of both, Joe Biden is their comrade-in-chief.

Is this what people voted for? Hardly, unless they were part of the radical destroy America commie-Left behind the campaign curtain. It is a war on America at every level: energy, economic, education, border security, a war against history itself, all accompanied by unprecedented violence and crime that follows.

And Biden is inciting a retro-revolution among blacks. Why not? Dems are the party of racism and have been since last century. They will do anything to hide that record, while cooking up a sequel.

Who does he think was burning all those crosses 70  years ago? They were Joey’s buddies.

“While support from black voters was crucial to President Joe Biden’s election, most voters – including most black voters – don’t believe the new president has improved race relations or made life better for young black people.”

“… survey finds that only 28% of Likely U.S. Voters believe race relations in the United States have gotten better since Biden’s election.” – Rasmussen

Obama now declares Joe Biden is Obama part II, here to finish what Obama stated. That means the malaise of Obama years is back with a vengeance: civil unrest with the chronically stagnant economy, a scandal in every Department, and a woke bureaucracy of radicals leading it clearing the deck of anything of value to America.

Marxists are materialists at their hearts, folks, who claim to be shoveling equity down our throats. America must be punished for its sins and reap the ruin they fertilized across the land. But it is no accident. This was their plan all along to destroy and unwind America from the inside out, the way our enemies never could.

So Joey OBiden proposes a 6 trillion dollar budget. And there is another 5-6 trillion in the breach to complete his promises. That is over 11 trillion on top of what he already spent. He’s only starting.

His lies are just as big as his Washington schemes. He claims the wealthy and corporations need to finally pay their fair share. All his tax hikes will only affect them and surely no one making less than 400,000 a year. (er that is 200k each for couples) No, it won’t affect you or regular middle class people. Don’t worry ‘bout it.

However, government’s accountability offices say the real fact is 70% of corporate tax hikes fall on middle and low income people. Does that sound like you will be unaffected? Then shovel onto that the hidden tax of inflation which always hits middle and lower incomes the most. Yet, Joe gets away with these repeated lies.

 

Now Biden goes to Tulsa, OK to lecture about racism while further inciting a race war in the country, to deliver that equity they boast about. Joe promises to bring more of the problems from the past back to life. He is the Jurassic Park of crises. Then he promises to fix them using the same failed policies that caused them.

Oh well, only so much time. But how is that working for you?

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2021