One of the favorite words Democrats use in their rhetoric is democracy. The angrier they get, the more they throw out that word.
Even though we are not a direct democracy but a representative democracy, a Republic, they insist on using the word to legitimize everything they do and their entire agenda.
But the word democracy is not what people should think of when they think of Democrats. Dems know the word resonates well and has a good image. Their own image is awful.
Now they claim democracy is under attack. Trump is trying to steal democracy. Democracy is at risk. Joe Biden said in his nomination speech, ”democracy is on the ballot.” What the hell does that mean? It means what you want to think it means — that it is in question. But with progressive Democrats it is in question.
They fight for mail-in voting or virtually any other extraordinary means to an election, from keeping polls open extra late, to counting votes days after an election, to disqualifying lawful ballots and including unlawful ones. Then running to courts to contest election results. It really is that simple.
They like anything one can think up to game the system. Ballot harvesting, guess who likes that? Mailing out millions of ballots to all registered voters in advance, who likes that? Allowing illegal aliens to cast votes in national elections, who likes that? Disqualifying military votes, who likes that? Registering all people to vote automatically, who likes that? Then using the euphemism of Democratic Party to invoke symmetry with democracy.
Sadly, some people still buy their antics of semantics.
So they would have you believe if you do not vote Democrat, then you are not voting for but against democracy. It’s a linguistics game.
Obama and now Biden were notorious for using the word democracy. So, with cancel culture being so popular now, wouldn’t it be wonderful if they could say Trump wants to cancel democracy or fair elections? Why not? It sounds so good.
But, like the Washington Examiner said in an article, in response to Obama’s convention speech rhetoric:
“This from the same guy whose administration launched a spying operation at the highest levels of the federal government into Mr.Obama’s political enemies in order to cancel a free and fair election.”
That is exactly what they did and were up to in 2016. Thereby canceling all our votes in the process. That’s very undemocratic, you might say. And people actually defend it.
Their side show of democracy is like everything else they do. But when mob rule wins the day in places across the country, don’t mistake that for democracy. When American people overwhelmingly support law and order verses riots, don’t let them tell you violence and rioting protests have anything to do with democracy.
I almost can’t wait to see their interpretation of this election and why people voted the way they did. What an abortion of democracy that will be.
Right Ring | Bullright | © 2020
Now here is one central question to ask for the 2020 election:
Trump’s Super V-shaped recovery … or Biden the Supernova destined to take it out?
That seems to be simpler and a little more direct than the old “are you better off” question.
John Kasich popped up again in Democrat’s convention, who also has a new book “It’s Up To Us.” So here is my memo to retro-John.
“It’s up to us” to call people out, John. You weren’t standing at a fork in the road … you already took it long ago. And you’re still burning those bridges, every last one of them!
How about this for a NEWS FLASH:
Just in, Joe Biden’s entire reason for running was because of a big lie.
He said he decided to run because of the phony Charlottesville narrative about Trump and supremacists. Well, it’s a lie. See how long Democrats can keep a narrative alive?
That brings us to suburban woman and the suburbs agenda. Dems and media contend it is a debunked conspiracy theory. No it isn’t. They just claim it is not true. Democrats have been working on that agenda for years. Obama had it all in place to take control of the suburbs and turn them into a Washington bureaucracy. Then Trump upended it.
But Dems are so worried about suburban women, they claim Trump is trying to scare voters, when they are the architects of an assault on suburbia. Now they chastise women to vote for Democrats, to oppose Trump. But doing so would be to vote against the very place they love and live in.
Sure, suburban women can vote against suburbs if they want to. Why they would want to is more the question? That would be voting to destroy the autonomy of suburbs, turning them over to DC planning, zoning and bureaucracy. That is the consequence.
In other convention news: Democrats featured an “immigrant” family in their convention to attack Trump’s immigration policy. Except for one thing, the mother in the family highlighted was originally deported under Clinton, and re-arrested under Obama.
See the full story here in Just The News.
Take a look at this article and video to see how they deliberately distorted all the facts to concoct a victim story. The child in the video says her mom was told “she could stay by the Obama administration.” But it was a temporary stay. They distorted every part of the facts, then cut Trump’s word’s and twisted them like a pretzel to imply he said something else. All a lie. What’s new?
In Michele Obama’s speech, she referenced the “cages for children” attack, while it was her husband that built them. If you think these Democrats are not capable of lying about anything they can for political gain, then I have some news for you.
It all stands conventional wisdom on its head. Repeal Dems, it may be our only chance.
Right Ring | Bullright
Now Obama will be known for something other than predator droning and a coup. He is the nastiest of former presidents, with unbridled vitriol.
So this makes me regret a whole bunch of things. Remember all those times that some conservatives preferred to bite their tongues, or refused to use certain language about Obama? Well, I would sure like a do over. It would have been more than appropriate considering the things Obama is saying now about Trump.
Face it, all of Obama’s speeches were laced in divisive rhetoric. But we know it was intentional because that’s his M/O and the way he is. Some people refused to admit back then that he was intentionally dividing, not unifying, America. It was no accident. But dividing is what he is all about. So many people in the Obama years refused to see what was plainly visible right in front of their faces. And he was rubbing their noses in it while they denied it. Now we know.
It’s just that once he achieved a divided America, he was going to blame us for the very divisions he caused anyway. That was the game. He was going to project all his faults on us. Now we see that was his plan. How Obama and his militants attacked anyone with the audacity to criticize him. Don’t dare besmirch Obama. Nice rules to the game!
Then he unleashes his trash mouth of vitriol on Trump, even after he ran a coup and tried to undermine democratic elections. ‘Oops, did I do that?’
I only wish people would have told that bastard what they thought of him at the time, and what he really was. Remember all those times people like McCain said no don’t call him a Muslim or criticize him. All the time Obama took shots at everyone else, all he did, but they didn’t respond in kind. Then any critics were attacked for daring to criticize him.
Remember how it worked? Can’t talk smack about the black man, no! There was a whole lot of denial in eight years about who and what he was. But apparently he is not through lecturing us yet, calling us names, or hating on America for that matter. What a sicko.
How many more years do we have to tolerate this charade and his partner in crime, Soros, wrecking the country with their radical agenda?
Right Ring | Bullright | © 2020
Tonight Democrats’ are going for broke in DNC’s four-day long assault on the President of the US. The invective, vitriol and personal attacks are like nothing we’ve ever seen before.
If there were any phony hint of self-restraint remaining, Obama blew it out of the water on Wednesday night, with the most personal attack by a former president ever made on a sitting POTUS. It must have been a real feel-good moment for Obama in busting yet another presidential precedent, like all the others he obliterated.
One day your grandchildren may look back and ask, “you mean there was a time when former presidents did not go out and personally attack the sitting president?”
Now tradition is to attack the president using every conspiracy theory or personal assault possible. Have at it! That’s protocol, for the good of the country. Or just ‘throw a punch, for the children,’ as Speaker Pelosi puts it .
New norms have been set all across the country. It is now compulsory to take a knee at the National Anthem, too. Cancel words in the Pledge of Allegiance to suit yourself. Feel Free.
Fortunately for Obama, he had the luxury of serving under the old rules. More of that “change you can believe in” he promised. Spying on an incoming president and undermining an election would be perfectly acceptable now under his revisions.
So a counterintelligence investigation on a candidate, incoming president or even sitting president, why not? Knock yourselves out. If you don’t respect the country, why respect the office of the president?
I can’t wait to hear what Joe Biden comes up with for his presidential nominee debut.
But the problem with Biden is: some bad Chinese got him weak in the knees.
And that is just the way the DNC Donut rolls.
Right Ring | Bullright | © 2020
Night three, cast of infamous characters is getting bigger and bigger.
- Michelle Obama
- Sally Yates
- Bubba the Cigar Star – Bill Clinton
So It’s 8-20-2020, all the nefarious snakes came out to kick the nest.
Oooh weee!! They awful MAD about something! They worried?
I can’t imagine anything better for Donald Trump than this cast of unindicted conspirators.
Obama said our “democracy is at stake” No, Barry, our country is at stake!
Meanwhile, the media is on a Shit Show tour. Conspiracy news leads the way:
- Trump is slowing mail delivery
- destroying the post office
- stealing the election
- stealing our democracy.
- Democracy is under attack
- Trump is a threat to democracy.
- Conspiracy theories?
Who is stealing our democracy? Where? MSM Madness.
Someone dial 911. Grand Theft!
They are defining democracy down.
Right Ring | Bullright | © 2020
One more night of the over-produced, self-congratulatory, fictitious world of the Democrat Convention. (I refuse to call it democratic) What did we learn that we didn’t already know?
Forty-seven years is not enough? What can Joe Biden do in the next few years he didn’t or couldn’t do before? Not a thing. He had all the opportunities, more than any other person. What has he done? What did he do for 8 years under Obama? He needs more time?
But leave it to Democrats to tell you a nice heartwarming story to cuddle up over, with a hot cup of cocoa and marshmallows. Tell us a story. And they did. If only it were true.
I’d like to see a contrast between Democrats’ rhetoric, and feel-good pop music in phony videos, with the real pictures of violence across America in all the big cities. Those pictures would be worth a thousand words. But we won’t see them. It’s too much hypocrisy.
We won’t even hear reports about violence or riots and looting all over. That is by design.
As for the bad news, weave into the carefully choreographed DNC script the conspiracy theories about Trump trying to shutdown or slow down the postal service. What nonsense. What narratives of mean Trump trying his damndest just to hurt the country? Does that sound like reality? Only if you are one of the fire-breathing Trump-hating hacks of the left – of which there is no shortage.
In reality, Joe Biden is a lot like the way Democrats opened their convention Monday. They began by a lot of American Flag waving leading to the National Anthem and Pledge of Allegiance and using the word Democracy. Then came the prayer. So very patriotic.
But all those things — values, principles, traditions – are the very things Democrats are fighting against. Now they try to glorify them. You would have to be under a rock not to know they oppose all that, singularly and collectively — flag, Anthem, Pledge, patriotism, prayer, democracy; all of it. Democrats even opposed God when given the chance.
Now they put up pictures of Democrats showing respect for all that. Phony. Just as they all stated those scripted things Joe Biden stood for and would do. But in the 8 years under Obama, it was all put on the side for the sake of radicalized politics . All was politicized.
It is phony. Joe’s phony, respect for the country is phony. Their love and empathy? All we see is hatred and vitriol for America. They despise our history and what it stands for, our entire system needs overhauled. What is not phony from Democrats? What is not a lie?
Oh, and the theme, leadership. What can’t you say about that? Joe wants to take us back to normal. But for eight years of Obama’s “change,” they said America is never going back. Now he wants to return to normalcy? Give me a break.
For a finale, Sally Yates claimed Trump is weaponizing the DOJ. That’s rich.
Right Ring | Bullright | © 2020
The takeaway points from the first night at the communist convention.
A Virtual Convention is not a virtuous convention.
Dems mad. They real mad!
Democrats are real bad at drama, especially without an audience.
The BS train left the station and everyone was on it. No stops.
Dems mad. They real mad…. Michelle mad!
Democrats are done.
Right Ring | Bullright | © 2020
There is a positive story to all this political speculation and posturing. Well, if you are not a diehard Democrat anyway.
But all you have to do is close your eyes for a minute and think it is 1968 again, with all the political turmoil, protests and unrest. It is also a strange election year.
Joe Biden is Hubert Humphrey, who was the beneficiary of being VP in an administration under which all the turmoil and problems blossomed. He tried to stand up a nice run for president while ignoring that he was present when the actions occurred. Does running against oneself sound familiar? It should.
He too wanted to ride a popular tide right into the Oval Office but it didn’t work out that way. He tried to remain oblivious to current realities.
Humphrey also had a long Senate career record plus experience as VP. But he didn’t campaign as he should have. He expected to just slip right in there, with all the pomp and circumstance his recognition provided. The office seemed to be there for the taking.
But listen to what Humphrey’s bio says:
“As vice president during 1968—arguably the United States’ most politically turbulent post-World War II year—Hubert Humphrey faced an excruciating test of statesmanship. During a time of war in Southeast Asia when the stakes for this nation were great, Humphrey confronted an agonizing choice: whether to remain loyal to his president or to the dictates of his conscience. His failure to reconcile these powerful claims cost him the presidency. Yet few men, placed in his position, could have walked so agonizing a tightrope over so polarized a nation.”
“The Democrats projected an image of disorganization and chaos to the nation that year, as the party at one time or another split as many as four ways into factions supporting Humphrey, Johnson, Eugene McCarthy, and George Wallace.” [source]
At least Humphrey had been an effective Senator but his consternation as VP, and the later failures in his presidential campaign to nowhere, did him in.
Neither Humphrey or now Biden were being honest about present reality.
Biden is running on the fumes of propped up polls and media sycophants’ illusions. The people didn’t buy it for Humphrey and they shouldn’t buy it with Biden.
Joe’s already hidden and sealed his records in secrecy. Kamala Harris has had the luxury of the same. They simply believe they are the untouchables – in a world where everything is scrutinized, including Obama’s soured, unproductive tenure under a shadow of scandals.
But in Humphrey’s case, his earlier accomplishments did not match up to his dismal failures in the administration and his campaign. While this could easily turn into a piece on Humphrey, it is not. He only makes the example.
It is Joe Biden who, less gifted than Hubert, has the uphill task. And that is all that matters. If Humphrey had to struggle, how much more a struggle is it for Biden – who does not have Hubert’s gift of extreme gab but the gift of gaffe. He has so much to explain for.
Contrarily, Biden is the one with all this to answer for but who skips along on Obama’s drafting coattails. His vast foreign policy experience was wrong and misguided at every step. Then corruption under Obama is the worst in history. Yet there he stands as if he were the savior, rather than quack in the basement, as Dems run toward communism.
You all know Biden and his record by now, well what is not sealed in a vault at the university. It is not a stellar example of anything.
Now the lesson to take from this is this: if Humphrey with a real record on civil rights and reform, under the pressures of a Democrat revolt, loses; then Biden, with a dismal record on anything and backdrop of a Marxist meltdown, should spontaneously combust into thin air. (no matter who he is running with)
Welcome to AA: “Hi, I’m
Hubert I mean Joe Biden, Jill Biden’s husband, and I’m a loser. Come on, man!”
Right Ring | Bullright | © 2020
It is clear, Democrats are running purely on race or racism. But at some point that tank runs empty. Joe Biden at the top of the ticket isn’t the best message. They don’t care.
Democrats are so infatuated by race that it is all they can see. You could sell me on a lot of big problems with culture or our systems today but that is not at the top of my list, nor is it even in the top five. I would go along with systemic corruption in politics, I could go along with some disparities – controllable or not controllable – but race is not the qualifier.
If I hear constantly that the Constitution is old and that this is the 2000’s now, so we must view things in modern context, without looking back; then why is it necessary to frame everything, namely politically, in terms of slavery or racial perspectives? And yet the Constitution must be molded like some Play-Doh with no regard for original meaning. You cannot make coherent meanings based on nothing, with no foundation.
But we are well on our way to canceling out almost any hint of our history or Constitutional intent. Everything is up for grabs with only that one constant remaining: racism and the race card always applies, like a limitless credit card.
Wikipedia says in explaining Critical Race Theory:
“Critical race theory (CRT) is a theoretical framework in the social sciences, developed out of epistemic philosophy, that uses critical theory to examine society and culture as they relate to categorizations of race, law, and power. It began as a theoretical movement within American law schools in the mid- to late 1980s as a reworking of critical legal studies on race issues, and is loosely unified by two common themes. Firstly, CRT proposes that white supremacy and racial power are maintained over time, and in particular, that the law may play a role in this process. Secondly, CRT work has investigated the possibility of transforming the relationship between law and racial power, as well as pursuing a project of achieving racial emancipation and anti-subordination more broadly.”
But face it, these people – Democrats in particular – don’t want racial emancipation. They want “racial” dominance in all issues across society. It’s the biggest cultural and political contradiction I’ve ever seen. From Harvard to kindergarten, and DC to the suburbs.
So these people have been cooking up this concoction for decades. They’ve finally added every ingredient in the kitchen and garage. This potion is not good for what ails you; it is guaranteed to make you permanently sick whoever you are, whatever your pleasure.
Put it into politics as the all-encompassing, sole force and you get the ugliest, most divisive, polarizing toxin in the nation’s bloodstream. One that affects and infects every area of life in society. Identity politics is the chaser. There is no 2nd act, it is the entire show.
Next week promises to be the National Convention On Racism…. or is it of?
With Democrats, they are not like a box of chocolates ’cause you always know what you are going to get.
Right Ring | Bullright | © 2020
It’s all about the economy now. Strange how conversation shifted from ventilators to the economy. But we may as well have put the economy on the ventilator for 40 days. So it was not that original 15-day or 30-day shutdown, but 45 days. Economic hibernation.
Once again, the left seems clueless about the economy. It’s the one part of the crisis that has not gotten airtime from liberal media. That is up until now anyway.
Suddenly the radical moonbat Left shifted to talking about the economy when Trump made the itchy suggestions he wanted to open it back up. Right on cue, the left flocked in to decry opening businesses. “Too soon,” they shrieked.
The real question, to Democrats, is not when can we open the economy but how long they can keep it down and how much damage can they do to it? It is obvious they only want to prolong economic effects as long as they can to hurt Trump. Bui everything is election politics and nothing is really about the health of the people or economy. All it ever was.
Democrats are oblivious to the national economy. What’s that spell? DONE. And we will be if we follow Democrats’ prescription protocol. Just what Dr. Evil of the Left ordered.
But now everyone is focused on it so their stupid political tricks are transparent to the entire awaiting country. It was the gem they saw in the crisis. Sure, people die but they have a wounded economy to use and abuse, which they plan on extorting to the max.
It is also obvious Democrats, led by Pelosi and Schumer, plan on holding the people and businesses hostage to their radical political agenda. And they have no conscience about it.
Rebooting the economy, then, should require booting Democrats as far from the levers of power as possible this fall. Even by then, they will have done some damage. Except people are watching closely and keeping score now. Call them the unDONE.
Right Ring | Bullright
Socialism is very much on the ballot in the 2020 election. How could it not be?
When did this socialism takeover happen? Oh, it is not a recent discovery. It would have to go way back. But they kept that closet closed and pretty well guarded. Evidenced by how Bernie was not mainstream until recent years. He wasn’t a rock star. He was a lead weight they did not want to get too tied to.
But then you have to make an admission about the current state of Democrats. There are a lot of socialism deniers in the Democrat Party. (That is not the same as denying socialism) They can disassociate with the term socialist if they want to. They can call it progressive like they usually do. They can even deny that it is about socialism.
But that flies in the face of the truth. We can see it is all about socialism. And has been for some time. Sure they are in denial of most everything, except Bernie.
Something else is going on. Notice the lamestream media, for instance. Just look at the last few weeks. They are struggling because they really cannot address the Bernie issue. Even CNN and MSNBC frowned and danced around the fact that Bernie was gaining in the polls. Then when he started winning they were dumbstruck. Why? That is another matter.
Media were not happy and looking for anyone else they could hold up and promote besides Bernie. See all the attention that went toward Mike Bloomberg? But it is BS in reality. They bemoaned Bernie sucking up all the oxygen. They reject the idea that this is all about socialism. They searched for a way to explain it.
If they didn’t like it, they had one choice, vet him and the ideas he’s pushes like a flood. Do they do that? No.
In the last few days, they are grieving the prospect he is winning and what it means for the Party. They sit and discuss their dislike that he is cannibalizing the primaries and the entire party. (he’s had some practice and never stopped campaigning since 2016)
They gripe about it and yet do not talk about the real problem. They will not address Bernie, his character, record, or ideas. They won’t talk about his bio in depth. (this man who has smitten the base by storm) They will not address the issues he is talking about, the cost or the consequences, in depth.
His plans are dismissed like yesterday’s news and tossed into the corner. The cost is not mentioned. The foreign policy he supports is not given an airing. So why not?
Now you know, it is because all those ideas are popular and supported by people. (now anyway) So they cannot criticize the ideas because they are the main entree on DNC’s menu. Of course they are popular. He is the one bold enough to run with them like a true radical. But he does not really explain them because he doesn’t have to, with an empathetic media and cheer leading Marxists in the party.
In other words, they do not dare attack what they all believe in. They all like and believe in these things. It is incredible how they will not take on or criticize the substance of all Bernie’s plans. So they do not like the socialism label because it has a bad image.
Yet they support all the ingredients of socialism. They deny the effects, but they will not deny the ideas. It is very much them. It is nothing new.
Now the dirty little secret is out, they won’t call out the ideas. They will not address the socialism issue either. It is the last thing Democrats want to talk about. “Russia, Russia!”
So they can say they are not socialists all they want. But if they are supporting and voting for Bernie; if they support the ideas and agenda; then they are socialists just the same — no matter what they claim.
When they actively support the ideas and campaign, they are socialists. In some ways they are the worst kind because they don’t realize it. Now it’s the cool morality of socialism.
That is why we cannot say it recently happened. This is who Democrats are; Bernie finally put an end to the questions. But that is who they have been been all along though there was a cognitive denial about it. Bernie already had commies and socialists onboard.
Yet they endorsed all the ideas and basic tenets of socialism for years. The closet is now open and the skeletons loom larger than life.
Right Ring | Bullright || ©2020
Unfortunately, not enough attention has been paid to Bernie’s ideas and campaign bling. Unfortunately, more attention must be paid to Bernie’s campaign. See the problem; who wants to do that? Not the media that’s for sure. And we conservatives could live without being carpet-bombed by Bernie juice 24/7, as depressing as that sounds.
However, it seems that some in the media are finally taking note of a Bernie campaign hallmark which media is calling the “Bernie Bros” problem, like online threats from Bernie supporters to silence or intimidate his other political opponents. Why the sudden concern? Because now he actually has some competition in the DNC. And because his supporters have seen this movie before and know how it ends. Call it bad blood or a family feud within the DNC. There is something for them to be paranoid about.
But Bernie’s campaign has always been dirty from the beginning. We know about it from 2016 in Chicago. We know how they operate in a cozy alliance with anarchists like Antifa. The Democrats usually love those operational tactics of the radical left when they are not targeted at them. But now they are. At least since the Bernie Bros tactics have gotten so prevalent against other Democrats, media is finally giving it some sorely needed attention. A little late. I mean this is what Bernie Bros do. In fairness, it is how Democrats in general operate. Just that Dems don’t like the threats and intimidation on themselves.
So on a Tuesday night town hall with Anderson Cooper, Bernie Sanders was finally asked directly about it. He magically condemns all bullying tactics, don’t you know? Bernie went into denial mode claiming he found some of those complaints, like those leveled by Culinary Union members, about threats hard to believe. To its credit, media have been reporting some of them. A lot of it happens online where Bernie Bros can single people out to attack them. Followed by other various forms of threatening contact. Face it, radicals are skilled in the art. But Hillary’s people were no angels on tactics in 2016 either. This time Bernie’s people are preemptively spoiling for a fight. Actually, radicals have learned these tactics work and have never been held to account for them, until now anyway.
That makes Bernie’s blanket denials and faux ignorance about it so laughable. He knows. Sanders told Anderson and the crowd that he found it hard to believe anyone in his campaign would do such things because his is the campaign of unions and much of their base is unions. It would not be possible. Then he branched out to other campaigns do bad things. He did go as far as condemning bullying. But we all know the Berie Bros’ tactics are used and incorporated in his campaign. We’ll see more of it this year into the convention. Democrats and media only seem to be waking up to feeling the real Bern of Bernie Bros.
On another matter, Bernie claimed in 2016 he received 25% of support from conservative Republicans. (from all conservatives or of his total support is unclear) He suggested getting more and thinks there is plenty of common areas. He said conservatives would probably agree with a 15-dollar minimum wage, prison reforms, his healthcare plans and funding college education. Really? But these hardly sound like any conservatives I know.
That could be his wishful perception. Socialists and commies typically resort to deception to get people to buy their ideas. And it requires a good illusionist to work the scam. When it all aligns the right way, they get willing dupes to sign on. The other key ingredient is using anger: at the system, at other people, at the rich, at institutional greed. That brings home the bacon. But it only works until the audience gets onto the gimmick. At that point, it requires cognitive denial of reality and then you are only along for the ride.
He also said he would win because of the largest voter turnout in history. Socialists and commies will deliver the largest voter turnout, take it to the bank — or from it?
So the Bernie Bro thing is real, and so are all the tactics. He continued on by bashing corporations and their ability to make money. He says he will hold them accountable. What does that mean, really? We know what it means in socialist or communist regimes. Work with the government or we’ll consider you an enemy of the state, and set about destroying your business, means — or both. (sounds like the the Bernie Bros’ campaign tactics.)
Then he talked about creating a big-government, FDR-type jobs plan in the aftermath of the sustainable new green deal’s economic slaughter. He doesn’t agree with welfare limits. He encourages more new teachers to have an influence on kids. He sees a day soon when no teacher makes less than 60k. Thanks to Bernie Bros. He can never hide the effects.
How about all those economic controls? Feel the burn!
If you aren’t feeling the burn yet, you just aren’t feeling.
Right Ring | Bullright || ©2020
Well, since Bloomberg seems to be sucking up all the oxygen, mostly because media have been giving it to him, there is now a new idea floated out there.
How about Bloomberg picking Hillary as a running mate VP?
You can read about it here. Matt Drudge was pushing it as an exclusive.
How is it the Daily Mail always gets the scoop on this stuff?
While the whole world is not watching, Democrats continue to debate themselves over the finer points of buying votes. In this greater theme, it was more like a steel cage match of Socialism vs. Communism. So far it usually seems to end in a draw.
Some people may say “you seen one Democrat debate you seen them all.” I sort of disagree because they are always trying to up their ante with the public. These candidates are the vacuum cleaner salesmen of the 50’s, trying anything they can to get your attention, to sell you a product you probably don’t want and can’t afford.
All framed under the rubric of everyone needs it. Just pick your preferred delivery means to get it. Sorry, no other options are available now. But a full compliment of accessories for their machine is being planned and built. And can Democrat candidates accessorize?
I have a new name for Democrats: the “we’re all socialists now” party. We can dispense with all that nonsense from over the years that they are not socialists and do not endorse socialism. At least now they are transparent about what they are.
It’s only a question of Marxist socialism or unabashed communism. They know it is considered forbidden fruit but it is so appealing to them. The gentle nudge tactic has given way to what amount of force is necessary to bring it all about? They are open on that question though have decided that the quicker the better. Like global warming, the time for debate is over — that is if there ever was one.
Of course, within this series of debates, it always comes back to how to pay for all these votes — I mean things. To that end, there is one dominant answer lurking: we just need to take a little more. Then they rattle off a list of top targets they plan on taking it from, for starters. But eventually it will come from everyone else, too. Only they need you to think there is some magical mine from which they will harvest all this necessary money.
By the way, it’s time government takes over the manufacturing of drugs as well.
So these salespeople of socialism will be back knocking on your door, again and again, with a can of dirt in one hand and a collection cup in the other, telling you “we just need to take a little bit more and then we’ll be good. Promise!” But you’ll love all the attachments.
Right Ring | Bullright
As Michael Bloomberg divests, purges all his assets and swears to a vow of poverty, he enters the Democrat primaries. Headline alert. Bye bye, Bloomberg News.
Not really, but isn’t that what new Democrat rules demand? This may get very interesting very fast. Goodie! I’m sure AOC and Bernie could help him redistribute his wealth.
And who will be the lucky recipients of all his extra cash? Just asking for a friend.
What an exciting time in politics! When will the festive de-wealthing begin? I think the giveaways should be live on TV. (that’s just me)
Let’s see how this banner of the Big Gulp cleanses his vast fortune.
Right Ring | Bullright
We temporarily interrupt your regular anti-Trump
programming to bring you this coup in process.
We cannot tell you, the objective target, when that
regular programming will be returning at this time.
Thank you for your patience.
[end of PSA message]
Right Ring | Bullright
Question of the day. A while back, this single-digit reader base would remember I promised to regularly probe some of the deepest questions of our time.
Well, I have one.
A 3-letter news channel interviewed Democrat candidate Michael Bennet. They were talking about Medicare for All, and eliminating private insurance, which he doesn’t seem to support. Bennet claimed Democrats don’t like it that much. They said but Bernie and Elizabeth Warren are getting lots of support. “How do you explain that?” He said ‘well, maybe Democrats are supporting them for other reasons.’ But Bernie is so popular.
So he claims they are supporting them for different reasons. Then he adds that Bernie is one of the most popular politicians in the country, and Elizabeth Warren has a star-celeb status among Dems, too. Naturally they are going to get loads of support, he says. He also asserted that “Medicare for All” schemes were not really plans but an entire ideology.
Now then, let’s reverse engineer that idea. I am old enough to remember when Bernie was a pariah of the Democrat Party. They distanced themselves from him like the plague, at least publicly. He was persona non grata as a member, let alone a credible presidential candidate. He wanted to annex part of New England into Canada for Pete’s sake. Even his incessant utterance of the word “socialism” was repulsive then to much of the Left.
They really did not want much to do with his craziness. Well, times have changed. One thing Democrats don’t count on is for people to have long memories. Bernie is now the most popular and notable Leftist among Democrats. He popularized the term Democratic Socialist and successfully applied it to most of the base. Times do change.
The real question is how did he go from that old Bernie Sanders the crazy, to the new Bernie the trendiest politician? Yet he really did not change his ideas or beliefs. But there is the Left worshiping at his feet. So if anything new is happening on the Left, it has to go through Bernie first. How did he take over the Democrat Party and their base?
It cannot be argued that he is a radical. Democrats in general are radicals. But Bernie is the Pied Piper of Socialism, until someone knocks him off that socialist pedestal. It is his movement. From pariah to proprietor. He’s the gatekeeper to new and cool ideas. I don’t claim to understand it nor can I explain it.
Yet, like the great pyramids or the Sphinx, there he is in full regalia. An anomaly of our times. What of Bennet? He is now the outlier. He was as lost to explain Bernie’s popularity as the Sphinx. The good news for other radical socialists is they don’t have to go through a transition, they can get elected as instant socialist heroes now just like the squad.
(Photo: Bernie Facebook)
Only somehow those are questions the 3-letter news channel cares nothing about probing.
Right Ring | Bullright
Is anyone else sick of hearing about Iowa? I remember a time when Iowa was just considered quirky politics. They have that caucus process and all. Then all these states were vying for position by moving up their primaries to compete.
But Iowa remains just as politically turbulent as ever. It seems more like fool’s gold. The fact that people are still chasing it is the real phenomena.
How many fish fries? How many fairs? How many dinners and fundraisers? And do we really care about Iowa anymore?
Seems to me they ruined any credibility they had when they revealed that over 40 percent of Iowans were socialists. By now maybe it is over 5o%, who knows? But who cares anymore?
The media keeps playing this game as if even they care. (but then they care about phone calls to Ukraine too) I would much rather hear about Anti-fa protests in Washington.
What’s Iowa going to change this time? That’s my view and I’m sticking to it — Iowa can stick to theirs. Or just stick it.
(*no offense meant to friends and acquaintances in Iowa)
Right Ring | Bullright
The Democrats reveal their true nature every time they complain about something. It doesn’t matter what it is because everything offends them, in some way.
Trump makes a statement or a tweet and whaaaaah! It’s like a million babies crying all at once. Trump uses the word lynching and whoa, it is national headlines. “How dare he! He should never ever have used that word… THAT WORD!!”
Trump makes a phone call to Ukraine, all the sirens go off and the whistle blowers come out in force. He said what? Sure, it’s impeachable because Trump said it. In fact, just admit it that anything Trump says is impeachable.
He calls for withdrawing troops from Syria and even former Governor Kasich runs out on CNN calling on congress to investigate and get to the bottom of it. Everything is worthy of an investigation too. No, we aren’t in ridiculous season. We are way past that season.
We are now in the season of insanity.
When Trump first came in, Al Green went to the floor and demanded the House start impeachment proceedings. So he called for a vote but he didn’t get their approval vote.
Not to worry, now they just start impeachment inquiry without a vote. Who needs it? We tell Pelosi to call for a vote and she says “we don’t need a vote” for that. We can start an impeachment whenever we like.
Of course that means in any future administration, a congressperson or committee can just start an impeachment and we are on the way. Due process is now no process. Too bad Al Green didn’t know that. What’s to vote on, just do impeachment?
Meanwhile, Democrats continue to be outraged and offended by everything the president does or says. He is in office which is the real offense. And every day he is in that office they grow more offended. If the objective is to drive the Left crazy, we finally succeeded. There is no road back from that. Actually, there is no up or down and no right or wrong anymore. There is only one state, to be perpetually offended by everything.
Addendum: I should have included that early on when Trump said his campaign was under surveillance, the Deep State-defending Dems squealed like pigs. How dare he claim in any way that Obama’s administration conducted surveillance on Trump.
Comey lied telling Trump he was not under surveillance. It then went into Deep State denial and claimed if any surveillance took place, it must have been warranted, legal and necessary. But it was not directed at Trump, and certainly was not political.
Well… that very Deep State of very offended denial.
Right Ring | Bullright