What’s The Deal?

So here is the deal, I mean the deal on the Penn-Biden partnership deal. The Penn State University has now said it did not solicit Chinese money or funds. Okay. Except that was Biden’s job to attract the money and government talent to the partnership.

Then Penn State in turn paid Joe Biden a whopping salary, along with shadow government cohorts Jake Sullivan and Tony Blinken, to establish Penn Biden Center.

Penn State would soon take in huge sums of money, over 54 million, anonymously from China. So then the salaries and money to Biden and his cohorts was just a kickback gratuity from Penn State, for the monetary support they received from China.

Sound like a great deal? What an ideal partnership.

If Biden and his people were working there, they were actually being paid by the Chinese. It was all Chinese funded after all. Who could question that setup? That’s the problem, no one in government would.

But now all of that appears to be coming under scrutiny with the takeover of a Republican Congress  digging dangerously close to Joe’s glory hole.

China got what they wanted. Joe dropped the investigation into Chinese influence on campuses. All sounds like more quid pro quo from ol’ Joe. No doubt about who’s payroll Biden was on though.

Then they find classified documents that Biden kept at the Penn Biden Center. But it seems likely the Chinese there would have seen them. But Newsweek tried to dismiss the connection of Chinese money to the Penn Biden Center.

Though it appears the whole purpose of Penn Biden was to raise Chinese (and other) donations to the University while self-funding the initiative itself through the University. (use Biden’s name out front) Once again, creating a figment of plausible deniability.

As Newsweek argues, lots of Universities take in Chinese money. Okay, but Penn State saw their donations skyrocket in the short time Penn Biden Center was established.  Build it and they will come is the adage, I believe.

This also gives Penn State the plausible deniability to say: “”The Penn Biden Center has never solicited or received any gifts from any Chinese or other foreign entity.” Sounds like something Joe Biden himself might say. The money goes to the University.

So Joey and his lab rats in tow could also say they were not being paid by China but by Penn State. And that the center was funded by Penn State. If all the funding was incidental then why did the investigation get dropped? I imagine that money would spend the same, whether it came from the University or Chinese donations.

As Tony Bobulinski said of the Bidens, plausible deniability is everything.

 

Penn got $258 million in foreign money, and there may be more it …

Feb 24, 2020 … The University of Pennsylvania accepted $258 million in foreign gifts and contracts from donors in China, Saudi Arabia, and other countries, … (Philadelphia Inquirer)

From “Democracy” To Trump

While the word democracy from Leftists echoes from sea to shining sea…

Democrats are busy working on plans that if Donald Trump should decide to run for election in 2024, they (Dems in power) are going to create and appoint a special counsel investigation on him. All based on his decision to run for president again.

This probably comes as no surprise to anyone who witnessed the last five and a half years. However, to preempt his possible run with a special counsel investigation is prima facie evidence of conspiracy to commit and direct tampering with an election. (from onset)

The rub here, according to Democrats’ thinking, or their excuses for this plan, is that it will be presented as a perfectly independent process — i.e. removed from politics, Biden, or his justice department and AG Garland. But nothing could be further from the truth.

So this is what the Democrats have planned: basically doing what they did via Hillary’s campaign in 2016 all over again. As if they have not investigated Donald Trump enough, or sicced enough rabid dogs on him to this point. One more time around the old Edsel.

But they want to hide behind the false claim that it is independent and therefore legit. How quaint. I also think it is no surprise that they are openly planning and publicly admitting it. Of course it is meant to influence his decision and ability to run. Duh.

Are we right back to ‘Plan A’ again? This time they are telegraphing their plans.

How’s that for “democracy?” — Now it dies in broad daylight.

---

Flashback: I like how Leftists idea to ‘save democracy’ was over 500 riots in 2020, and burning cities with over a billion in damages. What’s to save us from democracy riots?

Not to mention the violence, crime, looting and anti-police agenda = “saving democracy!”

Right Ring | Bullright | 2022

Heartbreak Hotel

Back in the mid-50’s, Elvis Presley scored a big hit with Heartbreak Hotel. What a song. But this is not about Elvis’s legacy, it is about our country’s. I know, the Eagles also had one about Hotel California where, “You can checkout anytime you like but you can never leave.” But I wonder if America is turning turning into heartbreak hotel?

“Well, it’s down at the end of Lonely Street At Heartbreak Hotel.”

No, I don’t suggest songs are prophetic or particularly relevant except that the vision seems to fit in some cases. Purely by coincidence of course, unless you are talking about literature and Orwell’s 1984. Then it probably hits much closer to home.

Anyway, what do you call it when a president or a political party attacks the economy, energy, history, schools, the country and our justice system (and the people) all at the same time? What do we have?

Put it this way, I’m concerned but I don’t see the solution in elections. I mean haven’t we learned that only goes so far? And that just sets the cycle going from election to election, and getting much the same results.

So I start wondering now and then if we can overcome all the obstacles and this agenda? Is it possible or is it fools gold? How many times can you get up expectations only to have the wind blow them all away? And I’m not recommending a no way out mindset. We still must have hope. They cannot kill that off.

However, when things look grim as they often do, it does start feeling like we are in a heartbreak hotel but with little other options. It is all bound to break your heart seeing this mostly intentional damage inflicted on the country. And as I said, with all these parts of the US being attacked at once, how do you defend the turf?

The Democrats’ rhetoric is anchored to the past while they systematically destroy our hopeful future. Not by accident. Ever feel like you’re living in an experiment gone wrong?

Take this example: I get a campaign flier from a judicial candidate. No party is mentioned but a quick scan reveals the words “justice not handcuffs,” in quotes like here. Wait, could it be a candidate attacking those radical “reform” concepts? No, sure enough it was another activist, leftist candidate running on that theme. This time a judicial one. The same rhetoric as radical DA’s use.

I previously looked into some of the radicals’ policies and code words pop out like a teen frat party. One of them is called diversion policies. You know: diversion programs, mainly for youth but not exclusively for them, which divert justice or consequences for crime under the guise of rehabilitation. The idea is to keep criminals’ records clean because of the “stigma” contained in conviction from the justice system. No record, no stigma. It’s the “system” that stigmatizes criminals — not what they’ve done.

So I read this stuff they put out as if it makes the case for the programs, when it doesn’t. Yet they are pushing this stuff on us like it has great results. It doesn’t. Sure, they make their case but lacking in it is any sense of accountability or empathy for real victims. Yet it is interesting seeing them put this forward as some kind of solution to the problems they are creating. It’s dangerous.

But how many people fall for this propaganda of the Left? That scares me as much as the programs. Another thing I notice with these radicals is that these programs have long legs. They just keep creating more of them regardless of whether they work. What can you do about them? Can elections fix this?

Even if you get candidates elected, the tentacles of these programs are still there, after radicals are evicted, contaminating the entire system. How do you keep up with current work loads while trying to restore the system? What are real the odds of success?

The idea is not to let these radicals into office in the first place. That’s good if you can. But it may be a little late, if they already are in various places. I only offer my area as an example. If they are pushing radicalism here, then they are doing it everywhere. It will be the demise of society. They don’t care because that is what they want, as long as it leaves them in political control when all the SHTF.

But there is no accountability for either the policies or crime it produces and encourages. Then we are back to wondering if the country can survive this onslaught of attacks or what it will be like in the end? Or are we already doomed to a Heartbreak Hotel scenario?

Only those that truly care about the country are disturbed by it.

Right Ring | Bullright | 2022

Abbreviated To Do List

Just a few reminders of upcoming tasks on the to do list.

• Joe Biden needs to be impeached for the border alone, and for numerous compromising activities, and being totally incompetent and unfit.
• Alejandro Mayorkas needs to be impeached for the border, lying to Congress and national security treason, collaborating with a foreign invasion.
• Merrick Garland needs to be impeached for turning teachers into terrorists, collaborating with school board association and WH. Politicizing and weaponizing the Dep to go after private citizens and using US Marshals for political purposes.
• Chris Wray needs to be impeached, never able to work in the Justice Dept again for covering corruption and carrying out thug-style terrorist raids on private citizens. And failure to remove bad actors in the FBI. Also for encouraging media companies to engage in anti-Constitutional conduct against private citizens.
• Pete Buttigieg needs to be impeached for being Pete Buttigieg and abusing his position and mishandling our Dep of Transportation.
• Nancy Pelosi needs to be removed for what her husband did to their bank account and portfolio, under her watch while she was in leadership.
• Chuck Schumer needs to be removed for making terrorist threats to Supreme Court justices and incitement of terrorism against them.
• Eric Swalwell needs to be removed for collaborating with a communist spy and hiding it. Engaging in Anti-American activities as a member of Congress
• Adam Schiff needs to be removed for the endless lies and phony investigations he foisted on the House of Representatives for political gain. Anti-American activities.
• Kamala Harris has to be removed for being the most incompetent Vice President ever, enabling lawlessness in the administration, and enabling an unfit president.
• Jake Sullivan needs to be removed and hauled out of the NSA for engaging in subversive activity and covering up in an investigation of Hillary Clinton.
• Lloyd Austin for politicizing the Defense Department and military with woke policies, targeting soldiers and endangering private citizens.
• The Inspector General Horowitz in the DOJ needs to be plucked out and removed for countless failures either ignoring or not stopping corruption activity at DOJ. The fact that all this conduct happened under his tenure as IG makes him culpable.

 

Any others off hand? It started off as a joke but it no longer is a joke, as you can see.

Right Ring | Bullright | 2022

Destined For a reality TV Series In Biden’s America

As the world according to Biden turns, our stomachs do too.

Yes, Edith, we have laws in this country and we have lawmakers that make those laws. Duh! Yes, we have a government that does not obey the laws of the land or ignores them. But they tell us the answer to fix it all is we just need to make some new laws.

I could see Edith’s face as she looks at Archie in disbelief and says “ooh, my, I don’t think I like that very much.” And Archie responds “well, neither do I. Geesh!” Then he adds, “don’t…don’t say it, Edith!”

So the very same people in government who do this come out to call us all fascists. They say we are terrorists, a threat to the country and enemies of our democracy. Okey dokey!

Talk about fascists? Just think about it a minute: these lawless people, in their fits of rage, telling you “you better behave.” Edith does not want to hear that one, so I won’t tell her.

And they think we the people are just too stupid to see what they are doing. We must be too worried about the problems that they created.

Meanwhile, Archie’s antagonist, Meathead, is out there telling Biden he has a great success story to tell us. Joe’s been a fantastic president. We just need to hear it to realize it.

“So grateful to have a President who speaks the Truth. A President who deeply cares about the preservation of our 246 years of Democratic Self Rule. Thank you, President Biden.”- Rob Reiner – 9/1/2022

So the self-rule express has slipped a gear. You don’t say!

“If we add 2 Senate Seats and fight like hell to hold onto the House, a Woman’s Right to Choose will become the Law of the Land and we will have Saved Democracy. Time to FIGHT LIKE HELL!” Rob Reiner – 8/24/2022

Kill babies and Save Democracy! Well, there is that too.

“If the number one issue for voters this midterm is the threat to our Democracy, the choice couldn’t be simpler. Democrats are fighting to preserve it. Republicans are willing to use deadly force to destroy it.” – MH 8/21/2022

“This Midterm there is no gray area. You either cast a vote for Democracy or Fascism. That’s it.” — the Meatiest Head – Sep 4, 2022.

Welcome to the endless saga of “All In Joe’s America.” This one is not a comedy. Fences and security protect the criminals inside the White House. Pink flamingos graze the South Lawn while a free-ranging president goose-steps his way through the halls inside, between intermittent naps. Everything is very normal in an abby-normal. Cue the theme song.

Now a word from our sponsor, Cracked Joe’s, the good humor food. Try some…or not.

 

Right Ring | Bullright | 2022

The Woke Goes For Broke

I write this not to have some fun with words, and see how creative I can be. I do it to at least try to make some formative point hopefully anchored to national traditions and values. It gets hard sometimes — words being what they are.

But what frustrates me is that in doing so, it cannot come up to the level of this current reality. Maybe in some ironic way one can only do that through fiction because the truth is too scary to even imagine. Truth and reality go beyond what can be accepted, easily.

A weird thing happened when Trey Gowdy delivered his weekly monologue once again talking about prosecution and Lady Justice wearing her proverbial blindfold. Trey being the great proponent for prosecution(sigh), his grievance list did not even include Benghazi. No, newsflash: ‘Lady-J’ is now woke and she is not wearing any blindfold. She sorely resents the day she ever did. That’s what we have here: outright rebellion against American concepts, certainly justice.

Lady-J is swinging loose and doesn’t mind showing you who she endorses, or whom she doesn’t. She has predispositions now and doesn’t mind you knowing it. She’s a postmodern form of whatever. It is all only relevant to wishes and desires — not yours particularly but of some woke mob who gets to decide what justice is, or is not. And she’s pretty much told us, through parlayed actions of the left, that she is not moored to any traditional justice you learned was fair and just. She has “moved on!”

She has busted a move and she’s not looking back.

All this recoil and flailing about on news networks of the left, or among leftist minions, is only their way of telling us that’s the way it is. Mother’s little helpers they are, telling us “there is a new mother nature taking over”, and it is them. [1] It’s woke and sure not blind.

Never mind if any others might attempt to take control because the freaks of injustice have a pretty possessive hold on it all. Dare you to try.

Who knew justice would be a fatal shot of a full frontal assault on the US? Something we so long took for granted, not for the outcome it always delivered but for the aspirational virtue we held in it. Crush that and you crush the hopes and dreams of the people. If you have nothing to defend you, then what is all the struggling about? Why not just succumb to tyranny? Might as well. That’s probably the plan anyway.

The whole country was founded on aspirational freedom and justice that, while not perfect, was as securely held as anything in the world. It was not guaranteed to always deliver the correct outcome, but the process itself had checks and guards to keep it fair. You might have to make Lady Justice work a bit, but the hope was to make it work.

Talk to an attorney sometime and a value will surface. They claim that they can at least make the system work. Maybe they cannot guarantee outcome but they can make the process do its diligence. Exhaust the options. Now that is even out the window.

We hear talk of amendments or bill of rights only to eventually realize there is no guarantee anymore. If nothing stands in the way of tyrants — be they party apparatchiks or court officials — trampling on your sacred God-given rights, then for their purposes you have none. They don’t care if they are violating a higher authority. They are the only ensconced power as far as they are concerned. And they have no one to answer to for it, which is even worse. It can all go as far or fast as they want to roll this thing.

To hear the Left use terms like social justice, I often think to myself: just what is it they mean by that term? Is it some social contract they think is a force around the world? Is it a form of voodoo or mysticism? Why do they want to substitute that, whatever it is, for justice based on rule of law? Don’t they believe in the rule of law anymore?

The sad answer is no. But if we don’t have a hope of justice, we are in deep doo-doo. They’ve shown us, in reality, what it means not to have real justice. The message could not be louder. The rabid Left’s response to any complaints is “get used to it.”

But it also doesn’t much care if you like it or not. Lady-J ain’t blind anymore and she is just as radical as Leftists are, or want to be. And stop calling her a she!

 

---

*[1]I did not originate those phrases – vague song lyric references.
Mother’s little helpers — cultural drug reference, ’66 Rolling Stones song
“New mother nature takin’ over“– lyric The Guess Who, “No Sugar Tonight / New Mother Nature”

 

Right Ring | Bullright | 2022

Grassley: there’s bias in the FBI

Surprise! Where have I seen this movie before? What integrity?

 

FBI Favorability In The Toilet

More validation comes out on that pesky public opinion. Now it seems many people believe the FBI operate as a personal Gestapo for Joey Baby and his administration. Now I wonder where on earth they got that idea?

A Rasmussen poll says

Voter Approval of FBI Declines

1/04/22

Fewer voters now trust the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and many believe the agency is acting as President Joe Biden’s “personal Gestapo.”

A new national telephone and online survey by Rasmussen Reports finds that 46% of Likely U.S. voters have a favorable impression of the FBI, including 15% who have a Very Favorable view of the agency. That’s down from May 2020, when 60% had a favorable impression of the FBI. Forty-seven percent (47%) now view the FBI unfavorably, including 26% who have a Very Unfavorable impression.

(To see survey question wording, click here.)

https://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/partner_surveys/voter_approval_of_fbi_declines

Just where do Americans get that crazy idea? Now do the Dept of Justice.

Back To The Russia Hoax And Dupes

A few people are being indicted in the Durham investigation. They are not government agents and are being generically charged for lying to feds. So that must mean they are just going after the liars not the feds who handled the hoax. That’s the running narrative.

Former prosecutor Andrew McCarthy is pushing this reasoning saying don’t get your hopes up because he is only targeting liars. It doesn’t mean crimes or government officials are complicit. Well this narrative has some flaws. Not that I have a much confidence in Durham’s positive outcome. McCarthy calls it “infuriating but not criminal.” Whether he is just playing down the propects on Durham’s investigation or not, it raises questions.

So then the narrative goes that the feds were duped. It wasn’t really their fault. They didn’t create it. They were fooled. Some say it was just “dirty campaign tricks” but not like there are criminal statutes for that and criminal conduct is another matter. Just walk through it with me.

Let’s remember this innocuous, “dirty campaign trick” (scheme) was rolled into a Special Counsel investigation at over 32 million tax dollars. Feds got duped? How does that happen organically without complicit willful intent? It also eventually got by that Special Counsel, too? Plus it wrecked dozens of lives and careers en route. How’s that just happen?

Now some clever Leftist may come along — not here — to suggest all the investigating and Special Counsel actions by itself demonstrates cause and reason it needed to happen. Justified on that alone.

The investigation justifies itself.

There you have it, the ludicrous defense of the investigation hoax in a nutshell. Use the fact they concocted an elaborate, corrupt investigation (scheme) to justify the Russian Hoax investigation. Use the investigation to substantiate itself. We did it; therefore it must have had to be done.

But the idea doesn’t stop there, because it can’t and was not the objective.

So we are to somehow believe Feds can discern lies from any Joe America — a serious offense for any citizen — but just cannot discern a lie when it comes to campaign hacks or nefarious foreign sources or intelligence operatives with glaringly obvious motives? (even if it was a counter-intelligence investigation.) And it is done in a national presidential election?

Just swallow all that. A counter-intell investigation requires sign off.

So then they (government/intelligence apparatus) enthusiastically uses those lies as a basis for a counter-intelligence investigation, and get dubious warrants, to ambitiously bring in a Special Counsel investigation (h/t to James Comey) of a then sitting president and National Security advisor of the United States.

Yeah, what are the odds on that happening without any willful intent to harpoon the new/incoming administration? Vegas anyone? Without the feds, government and their malicious conduct none of this happens. Now what are the odds this happens organically on the level?

But wait for it. Then they use — in press and media to defend their activities — the investigation itself to justify their investigation. Long shot?

But one more thing, we now know Dir. Brennan notified Justice Dep and even briefed Obama in August 2016 that Hillary’s campaign was running a dirty operation to accuse Trump of working with Russians. (a frame job)

Now if they are going to charge a few for lying and call it a day, it does not stand any test of basic credibility. So we cannot say laws were broken and crimes were committed in all of that? What of election law?

If that doesn’t rise to the level of some major, indictable crimes then get ready for the next viscous election. It’ll be a doozy! (I promise)

 

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2021

Truth MIA: The Bitter-Enders Return

Shuffling along forcing myself to believe in some sense of euphoric reality that is yet to come, if any day now. But living under that cloud of belief only primes one for more disappointment, when every day nothing comes.

It has been this way, or seemed to be, since this impersonator of a US president took operative control of the WH.  His main mission was to continue the deception of the last ten years. Or since Obama was elected the first time. The mission now is to pick up where they left off in 2016, but also incorporate the new resistance deception from their four-year long coup. Lucky for them, it only adds another element of blame to their hate arsenal.

Now it was openly assailing truth and history, along with anything that got in its bitter way. It is back, more bitter than ever, more determined to defile America.

 

I relish the memory of days when a president was actively working on the people’s behalf to correct the course of a government dangerously off its charted course. And progress was made to rein it in. Though not a day could go by, in those four years, that you could just feel good about it. The perpetual resistance could not allow it.

Constant harassment and resistance voices were all around as I sat wondering what the hell their problem was? After all, the economy was going reasonably well, and policies had  drastically improved since the last serpent of a president was in office. There was a sense things might finally work out or be all right, eventually. There may be light ahead.

But those nagging voices every day, 24/7 wanted to tear down any positive hope welling up from events unfolding in front of our eyes.The hope abolitionists. They plotted to steal every moment of satisfaction and achievement.

Only this time was worse than all the past episodes with the radical leftists nipping at our heels. Now it was such a concerted effort or front they put up that it made it hard to enjoy one happy moment. Never before had they gone to that level. And the fact that they kept up the pace for 4 years under Trump was proof of how persistent they are.

And this time it was aimed not just at the president or those in office they disliked but at the people who supported this welcomed change. They went from being titans of change to the very enemies of change. They would have none of it no matter how good it was. Especially the better it was the angrier they got. They defied anything good. Everything rotten they celebrated. That should have been a clue to anyone paying attention through the four–year nightmare. Somehow they could just not allow good to take hold. We needed to be surrounded by evil.

Of course, even in the riots and violence that followed, soon after Trump was elected, it was as much a spiritual warfare of good vs. evil as it was a physical battle.

Further complicating it, we had government taking sides in the promotion of evil which we had not seen on this scale before. The federal government bureaucracies, linked to the Deep State, dug in their heels in defiance of the administration and policies.

This inter-government feuding made the media and their resistance coalition thrilled to feel so empowered. Judges, whistleblowers, FBI leadership, and a DOJ almost hostile to the White House and administration. At any other place in time, this would have been considered treasonous and not tolerated, but not there. They had plenty of seditious allies everywhere. Never forget that good has an enemy.

Even some in the Republican ranks were actively working in conjunction with the resistance movement. We hadn’t seen that much hostility from within our own country before. The reasons for it were too numerous to mention. What did all their grievances really mean anyway? Those were as phony as the movement they were driving to unseat the president of the United States. Surely, they could eventually drive him out. But they couldn’t. That did not slow or stop them.

They used every resource available to them. They used every branch of power they had access to in hot pursuit of their goal, against the president and will of the people. It was a full-blown coup in process, fought in the pages of the press and in the major media daily. Truth was the first casualty.

But once slayed, truth would not stay down for the count. The collective opposition had no patience for that even as it reared its ugly head in front of them. In fact, they despised the truth as their sworn enemy. They had to keep truth on the mat gasping for air. It had to be killed in its tracks.

They were determined that the lies they were pushing succeed. But this time,  people were  their enemy as well. Before, it was always narrowly focused on individuals but now it was a broad attack on the people and anything that supported fact or truth. It was a stellar example in fighting reality on a massive scale. They did a lot of damage in the process.

The blame America first crowd has gone from anti-America to hating the American people.

 

In the wasteland of the damages they inflicted over the last four years, they resurrect a new president determined to continue the bitter legacy of their former eight years in office. Another vague motto erected, build back better. The Spite House is back with vengeance.

 

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2021

Senator Cotton Grills AG Garland

See Forbes video here at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vXDWroXTBwc

Garland is injecting DOJ as a referee and arbiter of the process between people and school boards. The AG is also hyper-concerned with the political process of elections.

Again, political duty calls.

So Garland is also injecting the DOJ into that process to nationalize our political elections. Just the same way he is nationalizing school board meetings into a school board Gestapo, targeting concerned parents. The 1st and 10th amendments are not suggestions.

We dodged a big one when he didn’t get on SCOTUS, especially replacing Justice Scalia.

Brother, Can You Hear Me?

 

Okay, so I run across a social media account from a guy in prison for 22 years on a life sentence. He claims he is making documentaries in there for some great justice reform causes. 

So I look at an active thread of his comments, all pushing his cause to get “this info out there.” Says he is also starting podcast and Youtube channels. He apparently has been shooting these documentaries inside for four years on an iPhone, chock full of information.

Now how is all this possible on a life sentence from prison, one might ask? Well, you got me. He’s talking to lots of people on social media though. And through all those assorted threads, I see many other social justice orgs, some started by former inmates.

 

Then there is the whole justice movement in general pushing all kinds of radical ideas like abolishing, defunding police and the usual anti-justice causes. On top and intermingled with BLM or various “anti-racists”. There is a lot of active support for these leftist radicals, along with Marxist ideology. What does it say about this country?

Just couple that with DA’s from hell rolling out across the country, which mainstream media never mentions. What is to come?

But, if you listen to government and stem-winding Democrats, the biggest concern in America right now are the Trump supporters and right-wing extremists that pose the greatest threat to the country.

Yeah, right, I hear you.

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2021

Biden Deconstruction Plan

Throughout the worst of COVID, amidst the rising death counts and hospitalizations, the fears and anxieties, one encouraging thing beneath it all was that our economy was better positioned to take a hit than any other in the world. Little comfort in those times.

We knew that once the pandemic subsided, we had a strong economic base from which to recover. At least there was that.

But now what a brand new Biden administration has done on the heels of the pandemic is set out to burn down our economic house. Let’s skip the why part for now, that destruction is under way. It is the worst case of economic arson in history. But it is not even a controlled burn since their objective is out of control torching.

 

What Biden and company, and their leftists allied together, have done is create one crisis after another. If it were not for the stability we had in the last administration, with a momentum to security and economic freedom, they would have wreaked doom before now.

The news reports of Colonial Pipeline hacking only added to and accelerated the damage Biden et al are doing. But it is intentional. There are no accidents in DC right now. We are on a schedule of planned demolition of the US. One of the worst collateral symptoms is  those who care are more reluctant to speak out than ever, for fear of retaliation or retribution.

This as government rounds up people it calls suspects in their priority to purge right-wing extremists – aka Trump supporters – from society. Sound like a rational plan? Make no mistake it is totally a politically-run operation. It wants the US on its knees.

So we have a powerful visual. We have been told the biggest threat to domestic homeland is right-wing extremists and racists. They have eliminated the possibility of all others. The white supremacists and right-wing are the only major threat to our country. How many times have we heard that, repeated on a loop straight from FBI, echoed by the Dep of Justice, the president and every other faucet or bureau in the administration? Yes, we are the greatest threat and enemy of the United States.

 

Maybe instead of government, as in DOJ and FBI, chasing mythical right-wing extremist threats, it should focus on real threats to the nation’s security – not on doing no-knock, swat raids on political enemies for attending a political rally.

But no. Rather than that they welcome the threats. They invite them; even sympathize with their cause. Again, not by accident, not for a moment. They welcome a border invasion crisis. They facilitate enemies like the cartels. They allow drugs to pour into the US.

 

The socialist/Marxist/commies have devoured anything of the Democrat Party. They are cannibalizing the country, piece by piece. The only thing unifying them is destruction of America, and with it the economy. The enemies of America are in control of America.

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2021

It’s Wray Time Again

Just a few comments on the hearings with FBI Director Chris Wray.

At one point he said the FBI focuses on the violence not the particular ideology or motivations. He repeated that doctrine a few times.

So why does he make an intentional point of always mentioning white supremacists and right-wing extremists as a number one threat? Seems like that is all he cares about.

On two occasions, by Cruz and Blackburn, Chris Wray was asked about the threat information they had prior to Jan 6th, and who called for the National Guard or didn’t? He was reluctant to answer but did admit that a “local authority,” meaning mayor, declined or didn’t want the guard activated.

So if he is investigating this January 6th event, in the numbers he is saying, then wouldn’t he also establish the chain of who didn’t or refused to call the Guard? But he acts like he doesn’t really know such an important detail about the defense of the capitol. How could you investigate without knowing that?

Asked about the death of the Capitol officer, he did not know the cause or details of cause of death. Why not? And why were they telling us he was hit or beaten with a fire extinguisher? Suddenly he is now Sgt. Schultz and knows nothing.

About stonewalling Congress or not answering specific questions over the last four years, he has no answer. Then he is asked about FBI’s referrals or actions taken against anyone from the Horowitz report. His answer is that along came the Durham investigation which caused FBI to pause any disciplinary action in the matters. We must wait.

Chris Wray has proved himself just as competent as Comey and McCabe were. But he can tell you he made two significant minority appointments among 6 top-floor department heads.One Asian and one black. That’s a relief to know.

As to who knew what when at the Capitol, who can really know? Come on, man!

I don’t know why this would belong here but…..

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2021

Under Siege: Martial Law Continues

Democracy now means Martial Law. There are over 10k troops in DC to explain that. Usually, when the guard is dispatched, when the threat dissipates so does the guard.

But not in this case. They are there for an important reason, image. To show you we are under Martial Law and very much at risk. (apparently from Americans).

Do they want us to think that the process, government, our democratic process are all in such dysfunctional shape that they need to have the Guard stabilize the system? Yes.

That image is important to remind people. When they hold an impeachment of a former president, they need the image of the guard to remind you of this huge threat.

The irony is that if Trump had called out the guard, they would have called it Martial Law that minute, saying it was for his personal use. You know that because they were warning us a month before inauguration that Trump was going to do exactly that.

Now they declare that Martial Law is the new democracy. But there is another cynical tactic here. Who called the guard? Since when is Christopher Wray in charge of calling out the National Guard. That is the essence of this. Where did he get that power? He stated over-hyped threats and, voila, out comes the guard.

This doesn’t seem to bother Joe Biden though, since he is now president and Commander-In-Chief. Or is someone else? Who handed that off to Chris Wray and the FBI?

Free speech and the First Amendment are also under assault. And crickets are chirping on the Left. It suits them and the administration just fine. A nation under siege.

Cancel culture and their army of proxies will enforce and defend their edicts.
Resistance has officially been abolished.

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2021

Come What May: DOJ Show And Tell

There was a popular song somewhere in the 80’s, “walk like an Egyptian.” It was all the rage but more than a song, it was a metaphor for the times.

In that vein, doing something I detest, I will think like a liberal. I know, it hurts me to say it and can be dangerous because no one needs to give them any ideas. Hopefully, I can land this 747 somewhere on the ball field. When they go low… we keep digging deeper.

I thought about special counsel Durham and possibility of a special counsel to Hunter Biden — or current lack of one. How might Democrats react to any bad news?

Well, we already know how they act to anything that is good news, even partia;ly good. If they have to take one good nugget out of something, they will monopolize that element. I have watched liberals so long; I almost know how they think.

So let’s suppose some bad details come out about what Comey and the coup team did in 2016. Any harsh details will be contrasted to the Mueller report. They will try to remain on their platform that the Crossfire Hurricane was a justified investigation.

Why would I know that? Comey, McCabe, Brennan and company dug in their heels everywhere saying they had to investigate it. I expect Dems will continue that story, having Democrats like Schiff bang that drum.

But the alternative is what else can they say? In the face of damning evidence, “oops?”

They can’t admit it was an egregious abuse of power. They can’t admit fabricating evidence to propel an investigation, They can’t admit doing Hillary;s bidding. They can’t admit to collaborating with Hillary, led by a foreign agent and Russian spies. They can’t admit the lengths they went, or were prepared to go, to make the preferred narrative fit.

By the way, have you noticed how with every explosive or incriminating story about the Left, or Deep State, media has this compulsion to plug in the Left’s talking points to explain it… or justify it? Then everyone defers to the Left’s explanation or narrative. That becomes the only “coverage” of the story.

But why can we not talk about or discuss a story without inserting the Left’s talking points? Who said that is the rule? The coup is only one glaring example.

So suppose things come together, miraculously, which point to the Lefts’ involvement, culpability and intent in cooking up the whole thing? Forget their narrative for a moment.

That would be nice. It could happen. Suppose evidence is so much and so obvious that the weight on the dam breaks? Suppose they decide to just throw much of the information out there because A) it doesn’t matter that much anymore or B) they cannot contain the bulk of it that has slipped out already.(and they want to move away from it)

So they make a conscious decision to tell us but in such a way knowing we can’t do anything about it now. The only thing left is to admit it, in part, but still adhere to the line that they didn’t really do anything wrong that was breaking the law.

Yes, this could all happen, maybe with slight variations to it.

But I expect how they would handle that would be the same basic strategy the Left employed before. That is not complete denial. It is more like the yes but defense. Yes, we did certain things but the reasoning is our excuse.

The reasoning for it goes something like this. But remember this is after they get caught with their hand in the cookie jar.

They might say well yes, but what was done was apparently not bad enough and actually did not harm or alter the presidency. See, even if this is all so, Trump has gone on to fill out his term, and did not seem be that affected from it all. (it does get absurd)

Think of it as a similar defense to the election and fraud. So what?

In fact, Trump actually proved that a president can still function effectively even if all this was opposed to him. No one deprived him of his duties, which he was able to carry out. So any harm to the president is being over blown. Frankly, we don’t see where the institution of the presidency was permanently harmed.

And just the fact that he went through this, even if it were all so, shows that the beautiful system works. We find out if there were errors or offenses committed and we move on. But Trump was never endangered or prevented from doing his job.

So this test proved that the system works, The presidency survived in tact and is preserved. The system dealt with it and we persevered just fine. This is what should happen, the way it should work. We investigate and act accordingly. The lesson is the system worked. It was stronger than what anyone tried to do, or anything Trump did.

I’m sorry of that sounds just like a liberal talking because those are the kinds of things they say. It is the “any defense theory.” Throw anything out there to defend the indefensible.

I know I have made some assumptions here, I know there are some what-ifs and maybe a little optimism that schemes will be exposed. Can you see where any of this is possible?

How much could happen we will find out. Hopefully we will.

They said that about election fraud, The fraud was not enough to have changed the result. Therefore the result mitigates the fraud that happened. It is not enough to matter.
Likewise, what they did in the coup was not enough to affect things so it doesn’t matter. They take the position it had no major effect, even if it led to a phony impeachment.

And the impeachment too showed the system worked. We are stronger now for having gone through it. This is the reasoning we are dealing with on the Left. They wil try to use the situation to mitigate what they did. Sort of like a third-grader arguing out of breaking the window. The damage is not irreparable so it doesn’t matter.

The same thing applied to Hillary’s emails. No harm no foul because nothing was affected by it. All they see is victimless crimes – if they are even crimes at all. (which is the next step) No one would prosecute it – the Comey defense. (done…. there that was easy)

Of course they will not admit the Russian Hoax sets the precedent for unfettered spying on a campaign. That doesn’t matter to them. All that matters is who controls the levers of power. As long as they do, anything is therefore permissible. But if they don’t control it, then anything is justified in returning power to their hands.

Sure, you can walk like an Egyptian but it is harder to act like a liberal.

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2020

Coming Attractions: Port-Amerika

For anyone listening: I am only a messenger, one voice, and I control nothing or no one. But there is one interesting message I have to pass along now.

Please put it in context that the Left has been at this for months, for years, and their rhetoric is always high. That in mind, this comes from collective Marxist organizers.

I don’t know that they can crank tensions up any higher but that is their idea.

Black Panther Disciples
BPDisciples — [Twitter]
REMEMBER:

#September1st is the first day of
#SuperStrikeSeptember:

Collision symbol
Largest organized #GeneralStrike in modern US history

Collision symbol
Begins the same day as the nationwide #MarchForJustice for #BreonnaTaylor

Collision symbol
Every city will implement the #PortlandPrototype protest model

 

(BPD)–On September 1st, 2020, the Black Lives Matter movement, in #solidarity with the US #LaborMovement, shall make history. Together, the People will rise up and seize the reins of power and production and finally set this nation on the right path. The plan is simple:

REMEMBER:#September1st is the first day of #SuperStrikeSeptember:

💥 Largest organized #GeneralStrike in modern US history

💥 Begins the same day as the nationwide #MarchForJustice for #BreonnaTaylor

💥 Every city will implement the #PortlandPrototype protest model pic.twitter.com/MuW5SP63lN

— Black Panther Disciples (@BPDisciples) August 27, 2020

Trying to be the next James Alex Fields, a bunch of racist redneck ‘Patriots’ plow through protesters fighting for justice and equality

Portland is Kenosha is all of America 🇺🇸pic.twitter.com/SzrpMl6zQa#PortlandProtests #DefendPDX

📹 @TheRealCoryElia

— Anti-Fascist AWK (@AWKWORDrap) August 30, 2020

What we already knew, Portland is their protest model, their prototype. And they plan on pollenating that across America. I certainly hope the DOJ is watching it like the rest of us.

They boast this riot model of violence and urban terrorism has been sustained for over ninety days. So they plan on duplicating that success everywhere they can.

And there is definitely a solidarity with media and Democrat pols. What is left to the imagination? Now you know what to expect from Dems and media who amp it up.

Right Ring | Bullright

Obama’s Very Pregnant Problem

When Barack Obama stuck his head back in the political fray, he may know or not that he has a whopper of a problem. Note, I did say singular.

Last weekend Obama ended his silence by speaking out about the Flynn case running out of steam. Well, it really appeared to to bug him, didn’t it?

The Hill

“The news over the last 24 hours I think has been somewhat downplayed — about the Justice Department dropping charges against Michael Flynn,” Obama said in an audio clip that was obtained and released by Yahoo News.

“And the fact that there is no precedent that anybody can find for someone who has been charged with perjury just getting off scot-free. That’s the kind of stuff where you begin to get worried that basic — not just institutional norms — but our basic understanding of rule of law is at risk,” the former president said. “And when you start moving in those directions, it can accelerate pretty quickly as we’ve seen in other places.”

Barry Soetoro, Barack Hussein, or whatever name he is using, is probably starting to feel squeezed like a dishrag. If he isn’t there yet, he soon will be. He is likely starting to consol with some advisor (David Axelrod or Eric Holder) about the political ramifications of his newfound situation.

The more you think about it, the more you will see he has a predicament on his hands. Sure this case was about Flynn, so he and media wants us to think, but it is much more about Barack Obama and his administration. A s the coup was Obama’s administration.

I am not being dramatic, I am disappointed that conservative press has not connected the dots for Obama’s situation, problem yet. The quandary for Barry is how he plays his cards, he dealt himself, which determine everything else forward. What do I mean?

Either he plays it that he was the absentee professor, in which case he claims he had a rogue agency meddling in the election and presidency after it; or he simply says he was fully aware of the treasonous seditious coup afoot under his scandolous administration. See the problem with both options.

He is in a very bad place. But hey, he’s had almost four years now to think about and plan this out along with his excuses for it.

There is one other possibility that he could try to defend it all as justified. But that is getting harder, seeing how flawed and illegitimate it all was. We don’t even have to get into why, as in the real motive. He has to choose how to respond to what we’ve found and what is yet coming down.

Personally, I would like to see him have to spend 7+ million or so trying to explain his actions and those of his administration, just for starters.

No wonder Barry is lashing out under mounting pressure. Not that he ever cared about defending himself, he never had to. He has two paths in front of him, each will determine his future path and strategy. Does he try to defend indefensible behavior?

Does he once again say he was not in the loop in it all? But we know he was there and in on it this time. So does he pass it off as rogue actions of an out of control intelligence apparatus acting on their own? Or does he admit he was in the loop but they were all justified in their scheme? Will he take the hit and responsibility for all that went on? Or will he try to blame all his subordinates for screwing him and his legacy (no-scandal record) up?

His underlying problem is that kind of operation can only be done under the president’s authority and knowledge. By definition it requires his approval. Comey blessed him.

Oh, he is in a heap of trouble. You know the saying that you can give someone enough rope. And he has been given lots of rope and opportunities to explain this over the years. But just like Benghazi, he never does try to explain it. Now he must choose how to respond. Both are inherently bad choices for him. No surrogates or advisors can bail him out either.

I sort of expect that Barr understands all that very well. And Durham is bound to come up with something damning about Obama’s administration. So even if that does not involve him personally, he will now have to have an explanation for it. That is something Barry Soetoro has never been forced to do before. He doesn’t like coerced decisions or explanations he cannot pass off to someone else. No one can do it for him this time.

Right Ring | Bullright

An Open Letter On FBI

For years now, we have been forced to qualify every conversation on the subject by stating the FBI is honorable and deserves our unwavering respect for the great job it does.

Repeat: “I do not demean the FBI” echoing this decree on a loop.(optional megaphone)

I would like to counter that at the risk of offending those required sentiments. I am extremely ashamed and offended by what the FBI has done, apparently with carte blanche over the last 3 years. I am disturbed and disgusted by it. And I will not make apologies to anyone for my informed disdain.

This was not just some abuses within the system that occurred, it was the entire system that was abused. Nor was it some case of “sloppiness” regarding FISA either.

Not by some rogue agents within the department, this was done and condoned at the highest levels within the Bureau. Then it was defended even to this very day. I am supposed to have empathy for that? I think not.

That some of those responsible for this conduct are still employed in that agency is further cause for disgust. I cannot misplace my outrage for that.

To the rank and file agents: we did not do this to you, your agency did it. Do not blame us for the reputation hit to your agency. We know you did not force your superiors to do it either. That does not, however, minimize what has happened. It was egregious for the country not only your department. It shed a stain on our entire government as a whole.

I will not make gratuitous excuses for or minimize what FBI leadership did. As the premier law enforcement agency in the country, there must be accountability. Weeding out a few of the bad actors does not cut it. Replacing one director does not solve the problem. It is a leadership issue. And we cannot condone it.

So the “good work” the Bureau does cannot be used by anyone as a blank license for this.

The lacking necessary oversight that allowed it to happen is another big problem. I am disgusted by that as well. And that must not be repeated.

I make no apologies now or in the future. Those rank and file agents must now live with it, and the damage done, the same way the rest of the country has to live with this stain. We can only hope that it becomes a learning experience for us all – and for history itself.

Note: the era of qualifying statements on honorability of the FBI have officially ended.

Right Ring | Bullright

Perennial Bias At Work

Our government used the pretext of Russia to spy on a presidential campaign. And it parlayed that “investigation” into the presidency after Trump entered office.

• The IG Horowitz report declares it found no documented or admitted political bias in the cause of the investigation.
• It found 16- 17 problems with how the investigation was handled.
• Horowitz testified to the Senate Judiciary Committee that no one who touched this entire investigation should feel vindicated.
• It found fraud committed in the FISA process.
• The investigation used a dirty Russian-based dossier, paid for bu a political campaign, employing a foreign agent, as evidence in a FISA court for wiretapping + surveillance.

The question of political bias is almost moot now. Does it matter or is it relevant? An investigation has inherent bias, since the purpose is that someone probably did something wrong. But they qualify political bias as a possible concern.. I am concerned about both.

What matters is what they did, errors and all. The central reason political bias seems to matter is based on whether it should have started or not. And was it a basis for the investigation? Was it the purpose of it?

So did we really expect them to call the investigation unjustified? That would have been an automatic indictment on everything they did. It would be a glaring admission. It is doubtful even an Inspector General would be willing to do that.

Putting that bias question aside, the whole rest of the process which followed is an indictment on the cause of that investigation. Why break laws, use sinister conduct or act with malfeasance in investigating a justifiable cause?

And all that conduct happened to be against Trump.

So maybe too much emphasis is placed on whether there was provable political bias in the contamination of the decision to investigate? At least it was all around it. Shouldn’t there be a necessary attempt to eliminate bias? But that is not what we saw.

Back to what we citizen voters think. Much was made about our interpretation of inherent bias in the investigation. Though we had probable cause to suspect and confirm bias in the process. In fact, it almost screamed bias. That no one would have heard those screams would be irresponsible. How could we not see it?

All we heard since it began, and continued in its various forms, is that the FBI and its investigation is above reproach. But that is not what we saw. We saw a natural cause for bias alarm. Yet that we even questioned the FBI or basis of it was the problem.

The whole Russia meddling problem in the election had little to do with Trump. They did not seem as interested in investigating Russian meddling as they were in investigating Trump collaboration. Russia was the predicate to investigate Trump.

Now if we had fraud in the investigating itself, we certainly had it in spades in the media reporting all along. It amplified whatever government was doing, both publicly and behind closed doors. You could label the reason for it as political bias. But does it matter? The media were doing what they were doing. Do we have to prove what effect their political bias had in order to validate whether it existed? That would seem absurd.

Yet the entire cabal boils down to that one simple fact: our Government used Russia as a pretext to investigate Trump, in an election and after. Period. Nothing changes that.

But Cardinal Comey calls our fears, analysis, criticisms and conclusions “all made up.“

Right Ring | Bullright