Which Way Is Up? Government Solutions To Government Problems

Someone on Fox reminded everyone that just years ago many Democrats were chanting to get the government out of the bedroom. He joked how now they are in the kitchen. I think it was Stephen Moore. Well, the times they are a changing.

Now I’d like to take that a few steps further. Yes, they have gotten into the kitchen. They have raided the entire house swat style. And they’re only getting started.

But I’d like to keep government out of the bedroom; out of the kitchen; out of the pantry; out of the laundry room; out of the bathroom; out of the garage and basement. And keep it the hell off that roof, too.

That is not to forget luv-gov getting into those phone lines, either from the pole or tower. They’re getting in it, keeping a record diary on you as personal as your DNA. But hell, they got that too anytime they feel an intimate need for it, let’s say.

You might say that in jest for a laugh but it is true.

They have designs on all of it, right into your home — you only thought was a sanctuary. But then government,  or its pimps, want to follow the kids to school and weasel its way into their sexuality or gender identification. Start children out on pronouns and next they’ll be on hormones, preparing to have genitalia and breasts removed. Plus, an alternative is always drag therapy.

If you happen to notice it, well, the joke is on you because you are the nutjob. You are the bigoted pervert and they are the knight in shinny armor saving the vulnerable, at risk children from fruit-loopy parents now classified as “domestic terrorists.”

But I’m sure that, like gas stoves, all this is cooked up by conspiracy loons and none of it is true. Right? I mean no way is gubmint this obsessed with us personally. Or that is what they’ll tell you when they haul off and arrest you for voicing any real concerns about it. But that is before marching you off to “terrorist reprogramming camp” at an undisclosed location; where they tell you those were not your kids, but are now under the safe protection of government affiliates — let’s call them.

When before all this you assumed you had rights, which were forfeited when you dissented with their socio-political agenda. So something they denied called the culture wars, which did not even exist, turned out to be very real means to pursue their sinister political ends.

To my horror, the excuse or reason on which they justify most of this incursion is science. A thing called science apparently tells them, over their shoulder, to do all this evil stuff.

Even Darwin could not have foreseen the birds and bees switching places; nor imagined species identity being chosen, not scientifically verified — with government officiating it.

So it is 2023 but you would think it was 1984.

Right Ring | Bullright | 2023

Role Of Education

Parents should have a role in their child’s education; not get rolled by their child’s education process. Is that controversial at all? No.

In my opinion, Trump did not use the biggest sledgehammer of 2020. One that could have made all the difference in the election. It was not really marginal or a political issue.

That issue was education or, more specifically, school choice for parents. That did not get the focus or attention it should have.  Joe Biden boasted about sleeping with teachers’ unions, and his close alliance — almost incestuous —  with unions in general.

Teacher’s unions were on the defensive. So education was there for the taking.

The huge opportunity to use school choice against Biden and Democrats was begging to be played. It was a perfect wedge issue to pry votes away from Joe: from suburbs, to women voters, to urban cities across the country. We knew it.

Trump was preoccupied, though he mentioned it as an agenda topic. But it should have been the center of attacks on the Left. Joe is completely in bed with unions and the system destroying education. Idiot Joe is totally on the wrong side. It was perfect.

Why else were Dems so worried and determined to brand parents as domestic terrorists? They knew it. But Trump let it slide through the political cracks. It was a winner.

We can’t do anything about 2020 now, but it must be front and center in the next election. Why don’t Republicans seize on great opportunities when they come?

Right Ring | Bullright | 2023

Dissing the Constitution in Davos

Here is Chris Wray in Davos bragging to global tyrants that we don’t have a Constitution in the US anymore. He laid that on the altar of the WEF.

 

“The sophistication of the private sector is improving… and particularly important, the level of collaboration between the private sector and the government, especially the FBI, has made significant strides.”

“Significant strides” = means tearing apart the US Constitution.

Then he condemns China for not following the rule of law.

Wray and the FBI are not protecting the US from global threats; they have become allied to the Globalist threat. Fighting and controlling the people is job one, not fighting crime.

Take The L-Train, Don’t Complain

So here we are a month out from elections and things don’t look any better than they did before election. I know it is not really a loss, supposedly, but it certainly didn’t render the judgement we preferred.

Sure there are plenty of reasons for that — elections post pandemic being what they are. But I am not in the sympathy business. What has really changed? Right on cue we got the Georgia verdict.  Warnock drones were active, similar to the Fetterman drones.

It doesn’t help that almost immediately the attention shifts to the 2024 election. But if we are not accomplishing anything yet, under these circumstances, how do you have confidence in 2024?

~~~~~~

Media will do what it loves, shift all the attention to Donald Trump and any investigations they have on the docket. At this point, even the groundhog is getting dizzy. Once again, on cue they got a crocked up verdict against the Trump Org .

And it seems the conversation has not changed one bit. “Don’t pay any attention to media” is the mantra everywhere of conservatives. You can’t trust anything they say.

Speaking of media and their nefarious ability to puke and return to their vomit, Elon Musk has his hands full just trying to put out the truth in Twitter Files on 2020. Well, until you realize how controversial that can be.

So Elon will have to add more private security and eliminate public events because of all the current death threats. And at this point he’d have to consider the personal risk from the Feds for exposing their little electioneering scheme with social media. But Musk said no more public photo opportunities.

Well, it’s the price of trying to do the right thing and telling any truth. Doing that is quite risky lately. Can’t hardly blame some people for laying low. Oh, the price must be paid for standing for right and wrong. “Controversy” now is anything that doesn’t agree with the left’s and media’s narrative of the day. Mess with that and you can draw the death card.

Meanwhile, Joey’s prescription for the public is 1099’s on any transaction over 600 bucks. From the founder of Biden Inc who had over a 150 SAR (suspicious activity reports) from bank transactions, which no one is allowed to see now. But Beijing Biden wants a tax document trail filed on every transaction for John, Joe or Mary of 600 or more.

Though Joe hasn’t shown us the Biden Inc transactions. Those would be where his son, or someone, paid the expenses and bills on his abode in Delaware. Illegal and qualify as gifts, a no no, which likely was not claimed as income for him or Jill.

Plus, we don’t know the secretive relationship or the donor amounts on a fund held at Penn State University in Pennsylvania. Nope, that’s on lock down but we know China is a top to that (slush) fund donor. No surprise.

And now we know the Congress got their mittens on at least 6 years of IRS tax returns of Donald Trump, with the Supreme’s approval. I’m sure those will be ferreted out and parsed out (read leaked) for public consumption, as they see the need.

You and I or whoever Joe America is anymore, seeing how the left hates the country, has to suffer what they are putting us through. As if inflation and economic calamity was not bad enough, with energy prices through the roof as well. But it is all intentionally directed at us just as it was in Venezuela. If they can get jokers like Fetterman, Biden and Warnock elected, then what pray tell can they have done to the rest of us on a whim?

Take the L-Train and don’t complain, say the growing leftist chants. “Heed the warning.”

Right Ring | Bullright | 2022

Don’t Rock The Woke Boat, Simple Simon Says

The condition of the country and world today, as it is not as we wish it to were, would normally be a great time for evangelizing. That seems like the way it always worked. We called them awakenings, revivals, or God moments.

People do need hope, faith that there is something bigger than the potpourri of devastation we see around us while the country disintegrates from that shiny city on a hill. All is not lost, God is still on His throne and nothing these people do will change that. He is in the capital Pronoun business. That is the message all right.

So if ever there was an appropriate time and need for a message, this would seem to be it. Except for one thing. Where are the people to spread it? I don’t mean just a few or handful of evangelicals telling the great salvation story. Don’t get me wrong, God can work in a few and look what disciples did once they got the hang of it.

But when I look at what many mainline churches are doing, I shake my head. No, this is not a critique of churches……. or is it? I’m not really sure, but the more I see the more I see at least some churches as part of the problem. That hurts me. It bothers me and it makes me feel uncomfortable about some fellow Christians and about the future. No, I don’t want to complain too much here. Wouldn’t be prudent, you know, or productive.

Then maybe that is what is needed? I mean every quadrant of society takes criticism from different sides these days. It is open season on the right folks or groups. Should churches be exempt from criticism? I know people probably don’t want to hear it. After all, churches are supposed to be part of the solution, and they often are, not the problem.

But the same age-old story you would get if you really broaden the scope to look at everything objectively (without inherent biases which seems harder and harder), then you cannot ignore the one stunning thing staring you in the face that does not go away.

That is, as bad as times are for culture and the rest in civil society, it screams to what is responsible for it. You have to admit if churches were doing a better job, then how could things be this bad? That would seem impossible if churches were very effective. So you must draw the conclusion that part of the blame is on the churches. Yes it is people themselves but the church is an organ of God that should stand up for and be doing something. No, this is not about church building for me. It is about being effective.

See if we all must take some of the blame for the way society is — or the country by extension — then churches cannot escape their share of blame either. I believe people are responsible for allowing much of this to happen. We can claim to be victims of it all but we allow it, even if we do not condone it outright. But churches are in that mix, too.

I know, it is an issue/story many people don’t want to hear, aren’t interested in, or don’t care about. I get that. But who can stand up for churches to defend them from blame? I don’t know who can make that case? Maybe I am doing the easy thing by throwing some criticism their way — rather than attempting to defend them.

Sure churches have missions and they do a lot of good. But that is not what I am talking about. When do we start, as people, taking responsibility for the society we live in? And where is the effort to change and fix it? Maybe this is all a cultural indictment and not about the individual. We like to hide behind the individual responsibility thing. But if things are the way they are, what does that say about us all as individuals?

I don’t mean this as a rant, just being serious because we know there are serious consequences to it all. We know that much. Just look at the way Democrats downplay or parse abortion. (most of those politicians) They claim they are personally not for abortions themselves, but they completely endorse having as many as society can provide, even demanding our government pay for it. Abortions on every corner, without limits. Does it make sense? There is a layer of excusing themselves in all that .

Like oh, I don’t personally rob banks or assault people but I will not stand in the way of anyone who does. “It’s their thing.” I don’t light fires, riot and burn down buildings when I am mad at government but I will not condemn the “love summer” of riots, political violence and crime. ‘It’s sometimes necessary.‘ So they stood there and watched cities burn and said nothing about it. They donated to the no bail or arrest cause for those that did it. ‘No, I don’t believe in it but I don’t believe in accountability for it either.’

Only a few classic examples. Where are the churches in all this? Or where are the churches when innocent people are being spied on or targeted for their religious and political beliefs, or for who they voted for? When forced to take a gov’t shot or pill or  else lose their job?  Oh, that’s where they would claim “but separation of church and state.” So we are to stand by to allow this weaponization against people of faith and do nothing?

It is a selective thing to churches as it is to the rest of society. They choose their fights when it is for ‘poor immigrants’ or downtrodden. When it is for standing up for illegals flooding the country through open borders, they are right there with their compassion buckets. But when it is our own citizens being discriminated against or attacked for their faith, they are silent. Show me a left-wing issue like climate change and they are on it.

How is it they can break barriers of a phony “separation” when they feel like it and it’s welcomed by society, too? But if churches stand up for people’s personal belief and faith, that is not acceptable to defend. We have become very accustomed where those lines are,  where they intersect and contradict each other. We accept it. What can we do about it?

So those ‘good’ folks can have charities, organizations, marches and fundraisers to help illegal aliens who broke the country’s laws to get here; but when it comes to those here that need help in hard times, they fall through the cracks. People who are not intentionally and knowingly breaking the law do not make the priority cut. Sorry, just not enough compassion in our tanks for that; but show some more love for illegals. Get with it.

Do you think churches deserve some of the blame for the way things are going? I’m really curious. I don’t see anyone who has made a great defense for the status quo. Am I being a little too hard on blaming Christians and churches? Maybe. But aren’t we supposed to be the salt, not the wine-chaser for everything the world concocts?

Could it be that some of these churches are doing this selective advocacy (I’ll call it) for a reason? Maybe it’s  to keep the finger of blame from pointing at them, by pandering to the world and the woke in one stroke? Just a question. That’s all and I fear that is enough.

 

In Critical Defense:

Someone may say I just want to politicize churches in general, because that’s what liberals always do and say. No, churches have already politicized themselves more than anyone cares to admit. It’s been done. They also follow the lead of some corporations.

And I never said all churches but I don’t have a number. True, some aren’t in that camp.

But for other mainline ones, they advocate political issues much the way some corporations have. So they gladly take positions on gun control, climate change, critical race theory, revising history, BLM, abortion, biological debates, border control, illegal immigration, LGBTQ advocacy, demonstrations, civil disobedience resistance, on crime, police and bail defunding issues, social justice activism, even some union policies.

They also incentivize illegal immigration through their advocacy.
Why does that almost feel sort of like Luther with a list of Theses?

That is to say basically all the hot button issues or controversial ones you commonly hear about. Green and environmental as well, And many of those in official capacities, in missions or raising money. They participate in marches, protests and sometimes have political leaders speak on them. All those are highly politicized issues. So yeah, they’ve become political. But no one points out those contradictions. Strange about that.

(So keep the pews warm… and I’ll leave a light on for you).

Right Ring | Bullright | 2022

Saving Sanity In The Biden Era?

The Democrats are using Orwell’s 1984 as a blueprint instead of a satire. Now they have instituted a Ministry of Truth. Of course they wouldn’t call it that, they would rather endow it with the name Misinformation Disinformation Governance Board.

Governing free speech is apparently so popular.

So they are rolling out their ministry of truth to combat, supposedly, all kinds of misinformation — or what they deem as misinformation. (anything they don’t like or agree with.) Ah, what an incestuous web they weave. What sparked this ? You might say it has been in the works a while.

Obama had truth squads and his brownshirt army who were out to keep the record straight. You had 911 Truthers to begin with, who were also part of the left.

But they now incorporated it formally into the administration. What more prominent place to put it than within Homeland Security? Since they keep repeating our greatest threat to the homeland is right-wing extremists, it gives away how they plan to use it.

You might expect such a bureau in some authoritarian regime but here it is in the US. “They’ll never get away with it” becomes another empty mantra along with all their other revisions to our government. They do it and therefore it is. Could there be a Constitutional challenge that tells them “no?” But what are the odds it will be knocked down?

Remember all the czars Obama appointed? Who would stop him? We now will have a department that codifies the network the Left has built among the Silicon Valley social media, to silence any political opposition.

And speaking of social media, what better timing for it than as Truth Social opened to the public? Could they have had that platform in mind? Then Elon Musk buys Twitter threatening their monopoly on censoring information. The Left is screaming over that like when Hillary lost the election.

Adding more insult to the left — as every Tweet from Elon now does — Musk tweeted about the political paradigm alignment. Well, the left jumped to interpret that as a defining of the country, which the Left jealously guards as their inherent right to do. Only they can define the country. So that offended them both ways.

But the image he used was simple and made a point. Here it is.

And that is all it took…. off to the races.

You might say Elon Musk also has some unorthodox ideas for Twitter, sure to set off fireworks — both literally and figuratively. But that’s a subject for another time. This is purely about the political paradigm Musk referenced.

For now, Elon swung at the fences with this image the Left was quick to try to pigeonhole. Many people agreed with his description of where he was on the spectrum of politics. (that was the purpose) The Left hyperventilated about that along with his description in the image that painted the Left as running further and further off the far left scale.

So that prompted someone like Matthew Dowd to respond with a description of where the country is. Here is that assault on reality.

Matthew Dowd
@matthewjdowd

“The truth is, yes the Dems have become more progressive as the country has, but the GOP has moved towards autocracy and further away from “equality and justice for all”. I would ask everyone to acknowledge this factual reality as they discuss the political landscape.”

8:47 AM · Apr 29, 2022

Get that, blame the country that it is going with progressives.

But we know the country got behind Trump and has trended to the conservative side of the spectrum. The country certainly is not behind the issues or ideas they have.

He wishes everyone would acknowledge that fact … er big lie? Autocracy right?

Only so much time, how sinister they really are. The pendulum has actually swung against the left. Under any poll they seem to be loosing support. But they skip down the yellow brick road acting like everyone is with them. People are running the other way.

Schools, the economy, inflation, socialism, green new deal, open borders, crime, anti-police. The people are not supporting their positions. They are running from them.

What started this defining the politics of the country syndrome? A simple Tweet from Elon Musk on his personal place on the spectrum. Though he seems to have a pretty good grip on what has happened in the country. How long till the Ministry of Truth takes on the subject to have the final “progressive” word?

 

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2022

Czar Of Free Speech

Obama promptly gets called out for demanding gov’t intervention over ‘harmful’ online content after promoting free speech

Chris Enloe– April 22, 2022  

The Blaze

Former President Barack Obama claimed Thursday that he is “pretty close” to a First Amendment “absolutist.”

But in the same speech, Obama demanded more action from social media companies to combat “disinformation” and even suggested the federal government should get involved.

What are the details?

During a speech at Stanford University about the dangers of social media and hyper-connectivity to democracy, Obama said Big Tech needs more regulation.

Obama claimed that content moderation “doesn’t go far enough” because it does not prevent the distribution of “clearly dangerous content.”

Thus, stopping the spread of “potentially harmful content” should not be “left solely to private interests,” Obama added, explaining that Big Tech platforms “need to be subject to some level of public oversight and regulation.”

Obama explained what he believes that regulation should be:

A regulatory structure, a smart one, needs to be in place, designed in consultation with tech companies, and experts and communities that are affected, including communities of color and others that sometimes are not well represented here in Silicon Valley, that will allow these companies to operate effectively while also slowing the spread of harmful content. In some cases, industry standards may replace or substitute for regulation, but regulation has to be part of the answer.

The former president said that in the same way food processors are subject to governmental regulatory inspections, so social media companies must be inspected to ensure they are “following certain safety standards that we as a country — not just them — have agreed are necessary for the greater good.”

“I’m pretty close to a First Amendment absolutist. I believe that, in most instances, the answer to bad speech is good speech,” Obama said. “I believe that the free, robust, sometimes antagonistic exchange of ideas produces better outcomes and a healthier society.”

“The First Amendment is a check on the power of the state. It doesn’t apply to private companies like Facebook or Twitter, any more than it applies to editorial decisions made by the New York Times or Fox News. Never has,” he added.

Read more https://www.theblaze.com/news/obama-promptly-gets-called-out-for-demanding-govt-intervention-over-harmful-online-content-after-promoting-free-speech#toggle-gdpr

Ode To Big Bad Neil Young

Mr big and powerful Neil Young,

Forces people to choose

Between himself and someone else.

Don’t let common sense get in his way.

 

Seemed like a stupid thing to do, to me

But what do I know; I was only one of his fans.

Guess the lesson here is you can’t have it all.

You can have one but you can’t have both,

And Neil gets to decide which one you get?

That’s just not a choice for me.

 

Poor Mr Choice, you ain’t mine.

Can’t you see you’re just no good for me?

 

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2022

Keeping The Lies Alive

If it is one thing the Left proves exceptionally competent at it is lying. The other is their ability to stick to it, regardless of what the facts and circumstances say.

In that vein, we have had a full-blown insurrection against the seat of our republic. America is at stake, on the line. They’ve taken over Congress, the White House and every faucet of government. But not by the right. And they are using that power and control against the people, particularly their enemies, to serve the demands of their mobocracy — which knows no limits or boundaries. To radicals, it’s game on.

There is a tired phrase you always hear about how we all should be able to work for common goals. It is ludicrous on its face. It means nothing, and of course it is only talk.

The reality is something entirely different. You would think there are areas people should be able to agree. There are crises and problems you would think people could coalesce on. Not really. It doesn’t stop people from saying it though. No problem is above politics.

If, for example, you have a major border invasion, you would think that would outrage everyone. But no. We see a crises while an open border excites the Left. They want more. We see an energy decline and that only stimulates them. We see lawlessness and they call it justice. They want more. Now tell me why the two sides are not totally incompatible? There is no way those two views can be reconciled. One wants to tear down our country, the other wants to build it up and restore it to the shining city on a hill.

The left believes the hill should be leveled and the only bright lights should be interrogation lamps trained on the people to watch every move they make. Anything the Left perceives as threatening needs to be destroyed, including the Constitution.

We see that same scenario over and over in everything they touch.

 

And now they have determined that a recent rise of parents attending school board meetings, asking questions and voicing complaints, are actually domestic terrorists that need the Patriot Act rolled out on it in order to protect their own cushy, government-fleeced positions along with their political ideology. So they need the DOJ to back them up against political opponents. (enemies)

These leftists want all the power and resources of the federal government aimed directly at their enemies. What good is an insurrection if you don’t enforce it with every muscle you can? (at least from the federal government) Taking prisoners and holding hostages is all part of the warfare tactics. No rules apply to them.

And yet some people can say there are areas where we can all agree. Where, where are those areas? Hasn’t that been disproven? There are still deniers out there.

Leftists tell you all you need to know about them by their reactions. Crises we call catastrophes get gleeful responses from Leftists, or else silence. They pretend they don’t see it. After all, any crisis is only a political opportunity to benefit their political agenda. It’s like following an arsonist around dropping matches as another person douses gas in front of him. (they are the radicals in the streets) And the only finger of blame they use is to point at conservatives or “right–wing extremists,” who are trying to put the fires out.

 

You see it comes down to perception. We actually take their words and ideas seriously, as crazy as those are, and try to apply common sense and reasoning. But that is not what those ideas deserve.

So the other day leftist radicals (otherwise known as Democrats) followed Sen Kyrsten Sinema into a bathroom stall protesting her because she does not fall in line with their radical agenda. (yet)

President Biden is asked about it saying “that is just part of the process.” Whose process? Who does this shit? It’s all about forcing compliance with their rabid political agenda. Of course Biden cannot condemn that. Nancy Pelosi cannot condemn the radicals in her caucus for their hair-brained positions, even when it is unconstitutional or unethical. “They do what they will.”

In Biden’s Speech on Tuesday to union members in Michigan, he characterized Russia and China as watching things move so fast that democracies cannot last.

“My meetings with Putin, my meetings with Xi Jinping and other leaders, they truly believe that we can’t compete in the 21st century because things are moving so fast, democracies take so much time, that they are so divided, that they can’t get together in time to act. They believe they’ll win the day and they can dictate their way forward and leave us behind.”

So democracy cannot move fast enough…..which is why they must follow Senators into bathroom stalls with cameras to get after them. Then he said something more telling.

“They’re betting, not a joke there, they’re betting [that] for the first time we weren’t responding to this inflection point in history, that we’ll fail to rise to the occasion, but you’ve heard me say it a lot of times, it’s never, ever been a good bet to bet against the American people, never. Look, just look back a little ways. After World War II, the United States did what we’re trying to do now, invested in the American people to lead the world.”

Just imagine this: do you think Putin and Xi Jinping are betting that we cannot do what is necessary to destroy our country? Does that sound odd? They are somehow betting that Democrats don’t have the guts to pull the plug on America, when Joe is right there egging on the radicals to do it?

No, the autocrats would be betting on these commie reds to succeed. They would be in sync with radicals’ to undermine Ameirica – and the American dream. Our enemies have to be betting on radicals, not against them.  Is that so hard to grasp with common sense?

In fact, Xi Jinping and Putin are only hoping conservatives or American patriots cannot hold Leftists back from abolishing the American dream. They would be hoping that Biden’s police state and crackdown on freedom and speech succeeds, that Joe can crush dissent. That’s what they would be betting on. Not against the anti-American radicals.

Biden always punctuates his economic theory by suggesting it has never been a good idea to bet against America. Our enemies don’t have to; they bet on Democrats to do it for them — who are betting heavily against America all the time.

So do you think our main problem, for survival, is that our big government apparatus (democracy in their code) is just not moving fast enough for us? Or is speed a problem.

 

One side wants to tear down America, while another wants to restore the Shining City. Which one, choose wisely?

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2021

Defining Times And Terms

It is never just the words Democrats (aka Leftists) use that are the real problem, but the definitions they apply to them that do the damage. So when you follow the Left’s definitions, strange things happen like the world turning inside out and upside down at the same time. Crazy stuff materializes out of the blue.

But in politics, there is a rule that you define your opponent before he/she can. It is all about defining your enemy. That was always the rule. Now something even better has happened. The Left has defined itself, all by itself, and it is not a good brand. So why shouldn’t we run on their own definitions of terms?

For example, all this mess everywhere – sorry I won’t list all the details – is their definition of great leadership. The other day I was reading where they called their evacuation plans in Afghanistan historical and making great progress. That is progress? Do you see what their definitions of terms look like? It is appalling.

“America is back.” There is a keeper. Then you look at what that means. OPEC is back in control, with the US back to relying on foreign energy sources. Open borders. They call a bill the For The People Act that only protects incumbent Democrats. It enshrines Democrats’ power, and then they can call destroying democracy “saving democracy.”

More definitions? Just look around, there are plenty because they love to define things. They defined failure as achievement. They say they are “making progress” on the border. Immigration is a declaration of citizenship — not a Constitutional process.

They have made justice for all into a two-tier justice system – one for them and one for others. But then they want praise for having brought “integrity” back into the system. I know these are grand terms and ideas but they are their own definitions of them.

A new green deal –  socialist spending, corruption and lies – is supposed to save the planet. Who knew you would save the world with fascist corruption? And without it, the world will die a speedy death in 7 or so years, as best they can figure. Give us lies to save the day and all of humanity. More lies, more salvation. Ideology is now science.

Abolishing police is the answer to crime. So then defunding police should also go a long way to cutting crime, significantly. That will cause the attrition of cops necessary to the real goal of abolishing police. Police are the problem not the solution. Anarchy is the solution.

Social workers can be the best law enforcement and just what America needs. The new police are the social workers. Put them in the center of domestic disputes and, guaranteed, only good things can happen from that. No need to be armed.

Get rid of ICE because if we don’t believe in borders then we don’t need any customs enforcement or immigration enforcement. Give that budget money to immigrants.

So don’t charge the criminals and then watch those crime rates go down. It’s magic I tell you. It is all in their definitions. If we can control climate, we can control crime rates.

The best one is the way they define reform. So reforming justice means less justice for people. And it will help those troubling statistics too. It’s all good.

 

How about redefining the word good by anything bad? How about calling failure success? How about calling corruption reform? How about defining everything you are opposed to as racism? How about making discrimination the law of the land? Call opposing it Jim Crow.

So when they say “law of the land” they mean discrimination and abortion. See, they have done a lot with their definitions of things. Now it is up to us just to show their definitions. Let’s call killing a baby “reproductive choice.” Shall we call it a right not a crime?

Lets subsidize institutions that promote reproductive choice (abortion) with tax dollars. And let’s put that right over and above religious liberty or speech. Let’s call freedom of speech “hate speech.” Let’s call government’s wasteful spending “investment.”

Let’s call concealing government information “transparency.”

How about screw all the white papers and campaign plans and platforms, just run on the Left’s definitions — against them. Run on their definition of leadership. Run on what their “success” means – losing and surrender. Run on what their definition of racism is. Run on their definition of prosperity. There is a lot to run on.

One of the basics in contract–making and negotiation (deal making) is defining the terms. But fortunately, Democrats have defined the terms already so we all know what they are talking about. They simplified the matter for us. Now all we have to do is use their terms as they defined. Run on their terms.

Joe offered another good one. He says America is back. So this is what America looked like? No it never did. He said from the onset of his campaign that he was fighting to restore the soul of the country. But he is not, he is replacing it with something foreign. This was never the heart and soul of the country. Just look at their definitions. Listen to him. It’s gold.

Incidentally, build back better is another defined term. It means backwards. It means undo progress, independence and prosperity. It means serfdom, birth to death.

Barrack Obama used to talk a lot about fair share. But now we know what their idea of fair share is. It is confiscating as much as they want from you until the point you can’t take it anymore, you’re broke, or they stop. (which of those is going to happen?)

We now know their definition of private and public partnership. It means private sector companies working for them, and doing what government itself is not allowed to do.

We often blame the Left for being vague, and they intentionally are, but we can take them at their definitions of their own terms. They’ve been extremely busy defining them.

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2021

The Ire Of The People Up For Grabs

What is the ire of the people? I’m not trying to be snarky but ask because every time the Left pushes a radical issue, they present it as the ire of the people screaming — as in the masses have spoken. You might expect a dramatic gong sounding in the background.

Discussion is over. Debate is done, and the only decision remaining is the price. That’s how they see it. The people are mad. If it were only so. The drama is high and Democrats lie.

But this is how they frame their demands. They are also constantly trying to stir the anger, angst and animosity in some segment of people to try to make their case.

As in everything the Left does, presentation is key. And that can be as radical as they are; nothing is off the table. Violence or whatever is only used to add legitimacy and importance to the issue —  instead of minimizing it. So they can’t go wrong with rioting, looting, violence, or burning down the town. The more the better. It demonstrates “passion.”

The right doesn’t operate that way — or hasn’t. They take a deliberative approach using dialogue, reason, persuasion and process. But those don’t matter to the left. It feels it owns process. We like to believe our methods will eventually work. But not so much.

The Left seems to gain as we sit talking about it. Increasingly, Democrat  legislators act the same way using Leftist tactics. Force is glorified, and any means to the desired ends.

On the right, legislators act the same way the right always has, with reason and dialogue. (often to no one because the Left is not interested) Always asserting that we can win this or that battle. Soldier on righteously. On and on it goes, zzzzzzz.

Meanwhile, the scoreboard tilts in the Left’s favor. Goalposts are often moved. We take note but keep applying the same tactics of reason and dialogue, peppered with passion and persuasion. Have you noticed lately how irrelevant reason has become?

There can be no denying the goalposts have shifted over the years. And we must admit fundamentally that the left and right do not value the same things, or see reality the same way. Let’s not kid ourselves. They are trained in political gain.

But there is such a time and place for honesty, even if it is in small doses. So let us be honest for a minute what the ire of the people is. We know, as the Declaration states that people are known to tolerate sufferable harm for so long, but there is a limit to tolerance. It is not endless tolerance to evil. Eventually, intolerance becomes a welcome asset.

Much of what we see rolled out in front of us are not sufferable evils, but intolerable ones.

What gets most normal, common people’s ire up is when it affects them personally. Since personal freedom, faith and family are things we value, those grievances can grab and focus our attention like nothing else. (rights and freedom are non-negotiable)

Go after our freedom, job, home, attack our family, our way of life; mess with our health, restrict our income; mess with our security; or mess with our kids, their education, schools and their future; and you have got our undivided attention. It is personal. That is where the ire of the people lies. We take it all as personally as it is. It is not some phony activism but very real. We tend to respond the same way, as the personal grievance it is.

But when you hear and watch this phony outrage-activism roll out prepackaged on the Left, they always claim to speak for the ire of the people. That is the organizers and Marxist leaders claim to speak for “victims” which they almost never are.

They are forever telling us what Americans or “most Americans” want. Who are they? Who made them the spokesmen for Joe America? They cite polls or selective sources to make their point. Then they move to preferred violence, looting and burning methods.

But people don’t like that. It offends our sense of fairness. The left believes it will get what they want, which is all that matters. That their violence can be ignored, denied and excused to justify whatever their cause.

I suggest they are doing all the above with alarming, deliberate ease to insult the integrity of the people’s sensibilities. The left can try to channel, redefine or nterpret the ire of the people as they like, but we know what it is. After all, that is about all we have.

So we know where the real ire of the people lies, and what it really is. Suppose we start acting like it? Doing so should not require any apologies. It is not a fictional demographic.

“Viva la Ire!”….  Too soon?

 

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2021

In Pursuit Of Life, Liberty And Happiness

It’s amazing that so much can happen over a couple decades. For instance Big Tech grew up and became Big Government. But it kept all its childhood protections.

Jen Psaki told us right from the WH press room that yes, they were in regular contact with Facebook and flagged many posts for FB action. Facebook also admits going out its way to accomplish WH objectives removing content. Psaki called it misinformation.

No, it’s about votes as it always is with Democrats. It’s all about political power, to use it and abuse it. The WH said it is concerned about the numbers of unvaccinated. Then they propose a vaccination drive to knock on some doors.  .

The next day reports of Democrat political organizers surfaced in Virginia knocking on doors. Who else would they enlist but political organizers, the same people who get out the vote?  Is everything about electioneering to Democrats? The simple answer is yes.

Jen Psaki also declared misinformation public enemy number one. Actually people’s voices are the enemy. They need to use their Facebook Fascist friends to ferret out their enemies. And they gladly comply.

So anything Biden’s administration doesn’t like or agree with is labeled misinformation and gets put in the hopper. Now its over COVID, or what they admitted to so far, but it could be applied to anything. And it will be, just call it misinformation..

Notice how every once in a while Democrats will come right out and tell you what they are doing? And when they do no one cares. Media sighs.

 

How sinister that the Left want to create a narrative about suppressing votes. The real story is Democrats want to suppress speech, the First Amend and literally their opponents. Their agenda is broad and drastic: to suppress life, liberty and pursuit of happiness.

The Abortion party suppresses life and liberty everyday. They don’t just suspend they terminate it. End of the problem.

But it is the votes stupid. They care about votes more than life. Actually, it is not really votes they care about; it is the power they extort from them. Or the power they can use against their political enemies. And the power to concentrate and keep that power.

The same power they use in the abortion industry over life. Have you ever seen people more anti-life than Democrats, or more power hungry?

Big Tech and Planned Parenthood, two of Democrats’ greatest empowered lobbies. Censoring speech and canceling life of, by and for government’s favor.

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2021

Hillbilly Wisdom

Did you ever notice that sometimes listening to the “smartest person” in the room is not necessarily the smartest thing to do? They make mistakes too. I prefer something called hillbilly wisdom. Though this used to be fairly common it is on the rare side today.

I like to think people were very blessed with something called common sense. Of course this is akin to that good old hillbilly wisdom. Many of its adherents do not put on pretenses, false or otherwise, about their decision faculties and are not recognized by letters before or after their names. They just know what they know and fictional accreditation is unnecessary. What do those letters really mean anyway?

I’m talking about common sense and a certain basic consensus in the country we all used to take for granted. It was everywhere and in everything. But it seems to be getting harder and harder to find. Instead, masquerading in its place, are things like guidance from government bureaucracies or regulations from the same. Just follow those and ask no questions is the running theory.

And heaven forbid, no matter what, do not think for yourself. That can be catastrophic, they lecture. When did all this individual critical thinking become so dangerous? I still think of that as an asset not a liability, though the elites and ruling class detest this notion. Critical thinking is something that must be squashed like a bug. This is a byproduct symptom of this new democracy they lecture about. You know, this democracy that needs to be protected and worshiped, which in realty is a lockstep mobocracy.

You are either in it or you are not.

I’m not interested in that kind of democracy they promote, or should I say demand. There is something called replacement theology and there is a replacement democracy movement, too. Killing off the filibuster because it stands in the way of the mob getting its authoritarian way is one current example. This mobocracy loved and worshiped the filibuster when they didn’t control the levers of power. But now that they achieved their ends – gaining control of power – it became totally obsolete.

So the filibuster is a relic now. It represents racism, somehow or other. Nothing could be further from the truth. So Jim Crow is the euphemism for all they hate. The filibuster was used as a tool for the minority. Now it should be discarded like a used tissue. This is where you know they have lost any sense of intellectual curiosity.

The self-anointed deciders of all things have done decided that there is no room for dissent. Everyone who doesn’t agree with them and their gifted cohorts must be expelled from the process, in both theory and fact. So they have social media and big tech, along with other corporations, do their bidding to that convenient end. “Nip it in the bud” could be their motto. Stop any skeptics or free thinkers from tinkering with their process. This has become the norm rather than the exception now.

And what is a fellow hillbilly to do? You know their prescription, sit down and shut up, and do what you are told. Is that any way to run the largest free country in the world, a country whose claim to fame is this individual common wisdom? The answer is we are as dispensable as the filibuster. Don’t bother trying to understand their rationale because there really is none. It is about power pure and simple. Just as it was with King George; their power shall reign supreme and that is all there is to it.

So these smartest people in the room have no answers to things. Heck, they only offer more problems and crises. Their “solutions” are specious having more to do with preserving their power than fixing anything. In fact, the objective is not fixing problems, it is breeding and using problems to their benefit. That’s their fuel; the more problems the more opportunities for them. We’ve heard them say it.

What about the hillbilly wisdom that doesn’t want any part of their chronic opportunism? Well, it simply has to be abolished or at least shoved into a black hole where it can have no meaningful affect on their agenda. We are to be scooped up in their vortex of power and scattered into oblivion, especially so we cannot talk amongst ourselves or organize, which is the greatest danger to their “democracy.” (mobocracy) Where free or critical thinkers are the enemy of the state. The jackboot of the system must crush it in its infancy. But what does that sound like? What kind of system does that look like?

Intellectual curiosity became intellectual catastrophe and intellectual terrorism.

These are smart and serous people, we are reminded. Media calls Biden’s appointees “very serious and smart people.” All they have to do is abolish everyone else. But when did Hillbilly wisdom, or its cousin, ever threaten and destroy the country? Don’t get me wrong, I’m not anti-intellectual just anti-stupidity.

Bullright | © 2021

The Most Important Question In The World

The most important question in the world right now is more of a personal question to everyone.  We have Marxism running amuck with no apparent end in sight.

So the real important question then is what you will do about it? And everyone will have to make that decision, at some point. It will be thrust on you. Will you wait until forced to answer or will you try to do something before it gets to that? Which is it?

But answer it we must. To have no answer is the same as condoning it. They interpret that as complicit agreement – or denial, which is the same thing. I could have figured out other ways to say it but the direct approach is best so words cannot be twisted or reinterpreted. We have a problem. What we do about it is what determines our posterity and freedom.

It is that bad already.

Some nay think it surely hasn’t gotten to that point yet or doubtfully will. But I have news for them. What more do you need to see? Do you need to feel the full-blown effects or are you realizing the truth about what we see daily rolling out in front of us? They have telegraphed their plans to us.

I know, we have already been accused of being deniers of science and lots of other names, conspiricists too. However, we watch them declare war on science. Yes, they call it science but they have substituted pseudo-psychology and sophistry for science. None of it is settled as they claim. They make it up as they go. A list should not be that necessary.

What do we know?

The Democrats have no credibility at all.

Everything they do is lie.

They are at war with science and the environment.

They believe narrative replaces facts and proof.

They have vilified and demonized over half the country.

They are determined to control what we think as well as what we say.

They are not loyal to what we know as America.

They are hell-bent on forcing socialism on us first. (that’s only the start)

They want total control of government and institutions of communication.

They will monitor what they don’t have control over.

They want divisions everywhere, even including a race war.

They have assembled an agenda of hate.

They will weaponize everything necessary to achieve their ends:
from information to technology, to means of production and all our resources.

They have no allegiance to our rights, as we know them.

They don’t accept our justice system as originally laid out.

They don’t accept limitations on government, only limitations on the people.

They push a “moral” narrative using any immoral means.

They practice the dark arts of deception in all they do.

They are purging the military and targeting their political enemies.

They will unleash anarchy and crime on us as a means to their ends.

They will seek to destroy anything in the path to their goals.

Government must be subservient to, not the arbiter of, their schemes.

Any of that sound exaggerated? It shouldn’t. It is all in place now rolling out across the country. Elections are not sacred to the sovereign will of the voters. The will of the people is whatever they claim it is. Their narrative replaces truth.

So it comes back to that all-important question, what will you do? The answer is still within the confines of the Constitution. But they have already strategized that battlefield.

What happens when people do not accept their methods and madness? We know one thing they still don’t like and can’t stand: any and all opposition.

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2021

Free Speech Or Risky Speech?

How would you like it if there were a committee of people assembled in your town who got to decide whether or not you have free speech to participate in the public square? Or if you will be banned from access to the same resources everyone else communicates with?

Well, that is what Facebook is rolling out over whether Trump has free speech and access to the public square or not? Of course, in this case they decided that no, in fact, he does not. He shall remain banned and shunned like a leper, well, at least for six more months. What happens then? Maybe their “high Committee” will gather for another verdict.

If any of it sounds absurd, it should. What if you were treated the same way? All it takes is them declaring you a risk and unpalatable. Supposedly Zuckerberg went to the trouble of having this so-called independent committee decide Trump’s fate. But essentially, it could be our fate as well, and will be, since we can all be given the same ostracized treatment.

It comes down to their verdict of whether one’s speech is free speech or risky speech, or if their empowered committee cancels your participation rights or not? But never tell these arrogant lords of social media that their own right to exist or function is contingent on approval of some “mob” or “committee” — either one amounts to the same thing.

In the end, anything that may be a risk or threat to their power is branded an intolerable risk that cannot be allowed, because it  threatens their habitat and power. Isn’t that what this is all about, their habitat and its preservation? They get to decide who is allowed into their ever-expansive habitat and who is not. But then they don’t live by their own rules, yet they hold the cancel button for everyone else in their hands.

In this hierarchy, there are no appeals or other arbiters, all decisions and cancellations are final. If the mob decides you should be deleted, you are. They control town square and those in it. Who made big-tech kings? I thought America did not accept such royalty.

Josh Hawley gave us a preview even before his book comes out. And now that it is coming out, despite their cancel attempts, the Left are even more enraged than before.

What else is new, we have a president whose Justice Department is targeting his political opponents. Rudy Giuliani is raided like some criminal. Notice how days after news came out about John Kerry collaborating and sharing classified intelligence with the Iranians, it is suddenly time to round up Rudy. Great diversion and defensive tactics. Do you think we’ll ever see John Kerry rounded up and raided for what he was doing for four years? Nah. Have you ever thought such things were possible in America?

That is the problem, it doesn’t feel like America with these things happening. This is not democracy or America; it is anti-American. And part of the country wants it that way.

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2021

Choose Your Destiny

In an interview on Fox, Professor Shelby Steele was asked what the people could do to push back against the radical race agenda controlling the narrative everywhere? He brought out Dem’s sacred cow saying we must stop all this white guilt and then most of the problems would go away.

Eliminating that would inoculate society against their demonic race agenda. I wonder how much of it would be stopped by ending white guilt?  The left knows that. Only white guilt allows this racial hustle to thrive.

Then, it is no wonder Leftists are pushing this race agenda against white children and families in our schools. There are teaching kids to be ashamed of themselves for who they are and breeding guilt into them. It is the way to perpetuate the whole agenda forward.

But try to imagine reversing roles to instruct minority children that they cannot ever be proud of themselves or where they came from. They must be ashamed of their heritage for the problems it caused. That they are seen only by the identity of their color and race. Tell minorities they can never feel equal to other people because of their race. Tell them their race is responsible for all the problems. But that is what they are intentionally doing.

Steele was right. I think the predominant problem in America now is the insidious, systemic white guilt being cultivated to perpetuate their nefarious lies. That prescription will inevitably lead to a race war and violence. Is that what they want? I think so.

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2021

It Is Not A Design Failure

What we learned in the last year is how quickly the whole thing can go down. And that all it really takes is a few aligned contributing factors. Our enemies have been plotting for decades what we now are doing and allowing ourselves.

Despite all the talk, this is not about race relations in America. It is about relations, but about the relationship between the people and the government.

Cue the Declaration of Independence:

“We hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all Men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of happiness—That to secure these Rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the Consent of the Governed….”

The important part for this purpose is Governments are instituted to secure these rights. But what happens when Government is no longer interested in securing our rights, for whatever reasons, or has other more important priorities instead?

Things go downhill fast.

We can get to the point where Government (if you can call it that) refuses to do anything to protect the safety and security of the people. In fact, it could get to where its entire agenda is to not protect  the people and ignore the will of the people. Imagine that? Right, we don’t have to because we are just about there.

That sort of knocks the legs out from under any real justice. But isn’t that what we have? Only it is not a matter of race. We will all be punished when it cannot manage real justice. Things go downhill from there. There are enough people now who don’t want justice and don’t care. But I wouldn’t trust any polls on that. And you know that based on what they do want, what they say and their agenda. It doesn’t matter if they scream about it and democracy. They want neither. Their objective seems to be no justice for all.

So where does a country go when that all happens? I can tell you it is a horrible place. Earlier in life, I had thought there was no chance of this scenario as long as some people would not allow it. Well, guess what?

I don’t like being wrong but I was. It can happen despite all that. The funny part is I don’t think Government will be too happy about the results in the end either.

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2021

Root Cause of All Racial Violence

You could have guessed the answer but in case you didn’t know: The root cause of any racial violence — or racism for that matter — is and always will necessarily be  ‘white supremacy.’

Well, let’s just take it as fact from a critical race theorist professor in Boulder, Colorado.

Yahoo News Publishes ‘Bizarre Screed’ About Racially-motivated Violence. You Can Guess What’s to Blame.

“As the current president of the Association for Asian American Studies and as an ethnic studies and critical race studies professor who specializes in Asian American culture, I wanted to address the climate of anti-Asian racism I was seeing at the start of the pandemic. So in April 2020, I created a PowerPoint slide deck about anti-Asian racism that my employer, the University of Colorado Boulder, turned into a website. That led to approximately 50 interviews, workshops, talks and panel presentations that I’ve done on anti-Asian racism, specifically in the time of COVID-19.

The point I’ve made through all of those experiences is that anti-Asian racism has the same source as anti-Black racism: white supremacy. So when a Black person attacks an Asian person, the encounter is fueled perhaps by racism, but very specifically by white supremacy. White supremacy does not require a white person to perpetuate it. […]

The dehumanization of Asian people by U.S. society is driven by white supremacy and not by any Black person who may or may not hate Asians.” — Jenifer Ho (Yahoo News)

See: https://townhall.com/tipsheet/leahbarkoukis/2021/04/10/white-supremacy-is-the-root-of-all-racerelated-violence-in-the-us-n2587711

But you knew that.  Someone now has the bombast to declare it from on high.

(exploding in a petri dish near you).
Class dismissed!

Language Police

This cycle has been happening on the Internet over the years, and always the same pattern. You have forums or sites with thread comments where people talk. Call them watering holes or whatever. People gather with ideas or positions to communicate.

Before you know it, others pop up like hall monitors trying to tell you what you can and cannot say. They claim you your opinions are wrong and that you or your ideas are a threat. Sometimes they call for banning.

But they stand there like it is their duty to attack you for what you say. So you are perceived as dangerous and a problem because of your views. You’ll hear the mantra both sides do that. They act like language police on a beat.

That is not how freedom works though. The Left don’t get to decide what people can say, think or do. They don’t get to veto speech.

You can tell from all these bursts, it is not just language or speech they are attacking. It goes all the way to thought. But it’s about control of the speaker. Some probably don’t even know they are doing it or what the end goal is. Some are well aware of it. Their real objective is to shut you down if what you think and say does not line up with their views.

Who appointed them the speech police? No one. They are self-anointed, like the grammar cops, to decide what people cannot talk about. They take this imaginary “duty” seriously.

They act like hall monitors that think everything in public domain is up to their judgment or discretion. This requires that they think they have power to make those judgments. Who gave them that authority or power?

So every time a social media opens, there are always those who think it is their entitled job to control what people say….or think. This is not how freedom or the first amendment works by any stretch of their ignorant imaginations. Yet there they are defying it.

They can’t just use social media like the rest of us. They want to conform everyone to their views and exclude others. It’s a natural appetite for them.

So we see social media companies doing the same thing in a coordinated campaign and are given the power to do it. Thus, control what you are allowed to say or what information is permitted. Other corporations reinforce it or do the same.

That leads us right down the golden path to corporate fascism. It meshes with the rest of the Leftist authoritarianism. I know they call it oligarchy but fascism describes it. And when did we turn into Russia?

Think it is not coming for you? Then you must not have said the wrong thing out of step with their views. Give it time, you will. It is inevitable at some point. They’ll let you know.

But this is not how freedom or free speech works.

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2021

A Word On Limbaugh

Rush Limbaugh has been gone about a week and the press seems obsessed by calling him hate-filled or divisive. He’ll live on rent-free in their minds.

First off, no one has probably done more for the conservative movement than Rush Limbaugh. But there are some consequences for that kind of success. He was targeted by the Left’s smear machine for decades. It’s what happens when you are effective.

The steady drumbeat from the media is calling him hate radio and divisive, polarizing. Only by the Left’s terminology and standards.

So telling the truth about the Left, their agenda and tactics is hate? Exposing what the Left is doing is divisive? Talking about issues and policy is divisive? The DNC has no patience for anyone truth-telling on the airwaves.

Rush could have been the original cancel culture target. They wanted nothing more than to remove him from the air, shut him up and destroy him. They couldn’t. He thrived on their efforts and it fed into his talk operation. Certainly the Left will be on the lookout for anyone rivaling his reach and popularity. Yes, he was a phenomenon.

But one has to understand what came before Rush: The Fairness Doctrine. That was the policy that forced airwaves to give “equal time” to issues and politics. As usual, the Left found a way to use that to shut down conservative opinion or ideas. The media would say they could not give equal time to the other side, so effectively it cancelled conservative speech. In effect, you were limited by your opposition’s inability to present another side.

The effect of that policy worked the same as their silencing agenda. They use social media now to do the silencing. There is no fairness. Equality is the last thing the Left wants. They want and demand a stacked deck: institutionally, culturally, and in the airwaves.

With Rush, they could have none of that. He wasn’t going to give them a minute of peace. He was probably enemy number one for that reason. The Left despises competition. They resent being challenged by the truth. And they certainly hated any idea about the numbers of Rush’a audience.

But yet in such an environment Rush Limbaugh flourished like wild flowers.

Just an aside, I remember back about ’92 a friend from Kansas City gave me Limbaugh’s book. He said this is the guy to watch and listen to. I started reading the book and realized this guy had the same ideas I had. For the first time the issues he would talk about made sense in a sea of political chaos. But the very best part was to realize there were a lot of people out there, almost a limitless amount, who agreed and felt the same way. And we were not going away. That is the way I remember it anyhow.

So now there are over 20 million Limbaugh’s who are out there. They are not alone or isolated. He started the ball rolling. But the Left saw the same thing with Goldwater and then Reagan before. They at least knew what it meant for them. If imitation is a form of flattery, the Left tried to duplicate it but couldn’t make it work on Air America.

I’ll miss Rush, but never ever forget him.

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2021