It is never just the words Democrats (aka Leftists) use that are the real problem, but the definitions they apply to them that do the damage. So when you follow the Left’s definitions, strange things happen like the world turning inside out and upside down at the same time. Crazy stuff materializes out of the blue.
But in politics, there is a rule that you define your opponent before he/she can. It is all about defining your enemy. That was always the rule. Now something even better has happened. The Left has defined itself, all by itself, and it is not a good brand. So why shouldn’t we run on their own definitions of terms?
For example, all this mess everywhere – sorry I won’t list all the details – is their definition of great leadership. The other day I was reading where they called their evacuation plans in Afghanistan historical and making great progress. That is progress? Do you see what their definitions of terms look like? It is appalling.
“America is back.” There is a keeper. Then you look at what that means. OPEC is back in control, with the US back to relying on foreign energy sources. Open borders. They call a bill the For The People Act that only protects incumbent Democrats. It enshrines Democrats’ power, and then they can call destroying democracy “saving democracy.”
More definitions? Just look around, there are plenty because they love to define things. They defined failure as achievement. They say they are “making progress” on the border. Immigration is a declaration of citizenship — not a Constitutional process.
They have made justice for all into a two-tier justice system – one for them and one for others. But then they want praise for having brought “integrity” back into the system. I know these are grand terms and ideas but they are their own definitions of them.
A new green deal – socialist spending, corruption and lies – is supposed to save the planet. Who knew you would save the world with fascist corruption? And without it, the world will die a speedy death in 7 or so years, as best they can figure. Give us lies to save the day and all of humanity. More lies, more salvation. Ideology is now science.
Abolishing police is the answer to crime. So then defunding police should also go a long way to cutting crime, significantly. That will cause the attrition of cops necessary to the real goal of abolishing police. Police are the problem not the solution. Anarchy is the solution.
Social workers can be the best law enforcement and just what America needs. The new police are the social workers. Put them in the center of domestic disputes and, guaranteed, only good things can happen from that. No need to be armed.
Get rid of ICE because if we don’t believe in borders then we don’t need any customs enforcement or immigration enforcement. Give that budget money to immigrants.
So don’t charge the criminals and then watch those crime rates go down. It’s magic I tell you. It is all in their definitions. If we can control climate, we can control crime rates.
The best one is the way they define reform. So reforming justice means less justice for people. And it will help those troubling statistics too. It’s all good.
How about redefining the word good by anything bad? How about calling failure success? How about calling corruption reform? How about defining everything you are opposed to as racism? How about making discrimination the law of the land? Call opposing it Jim Crow.
So when they say “law of the land” they mean discrimination and abortion. See, they have done a lot with their definitions of things. Now it is up to us just to show their definitions. Let’s call killing a baby “reproductive choice.” Shall we call it a right not a crime?
Lets subsidize institutions that promote reproductive choice (abortion) with tax dollars. And let’s put that right over and above religious liberty or speech. Let’s call freedom of speech “hate speech.” Let’s call government’s wasteful spending “investment.”
Let’s call concealing government information “transparency.”
How about screw all the white papers and campaign plans and platforms, just run on the Left’s definitions — against them. Run on their definition of leadership. Run on what their “success” means – losing and surrender. Run on what their definition of racism is. Run on their definition of prosperity. There is a lot to run on.
One of the basics in contract–making and negotiation (deal making) is defining the terms. But fortunately, Democrats have defined the terms already so we all know what they are talking about. They simplified the matter for us. Now all we have to do is use their terms as they defined. Run on their terms.
Joe offered another good one. He says America is back. So this is what America looked like? No it never did. He said from the onset of his campaign that he was fighting to restore the soul of the country. But he is not, he is replacing it with something foreign. This was never the heart and soul of the country. Just look at their definitions. Listen to him. It’s gold.
Incidentally, build back better is another defined term. It means backwards. It means undo progress, independence and prosperity. It means serfdom, birth to death.
Barrack Obama used to talk a lot about fair share. But now we know what their idea of fair share is. It is confiscating as much as they want from you until the point you can’t take it anymore, you’re broke, or they stop. (which of those is going to happen?)
We now know their definition of private and public partnership. It means private sector companies working for them, and doing what government itself is not allowed to do.
We often blame the Left for being vague, and they intentionally are, but we can take them at their definitions of their own terms. They’ve been extremely busy defining them.
Right Ring | Bullright | © 2021