Give Me A Break

Give me a freaking break is one of my favorite lines I repeat to myself lately. No one hears me. It just flows out of my mouth more frequently than any other phrase. There are hosts of reasons for it.

The main one is outrage, mostly at Democrat talking points or narratives. It seems almost every time you turn on the TV news or read something, there is that reaction in there. Someone is trying to con someone or twists something completely wrong. Show me any subject and I’ll have a “give me a break” moment somewhere about it.

Why is partly the way politics has become. And in part because of how low down the ladder we have gotten, or in many cases how backwards everything now is.

Judging by what I see on Twitter and media, I’d say a lot of people probably think the same thing and feel the same way. I also think most people see what is going on and understand it. They wouldn’t need anyone to explain it to them because they know what this movie is about and where it is going. In short, they are not dummies.

Now the media might think people are dumb, that they can spoon feed people along to believe what they want about issues. Whoa, do they underestimate the knowledge of regular informed people? Maybe at one time, years ago, they could get away with that but not today. I see it in focus groups and in conversations on social media. They’re in no mood to be bullied around on politics either. They know too much and have too much experience to be duped. All that said, those are not everyone.

Now I say this because these are the parameters for my conclusions. Others, like media, have different parameters that lead them to believe people are impressionable and pliable on their central basic opinions, based on information and narratives they selectively curate to give them. The media may be right about some percentage of voters on the Left. But I know that theory does not hold up on the conservative right. Here on the right people have preformed opinions for a reason.

 

Another idea I have given lots of thought to is conspiracy theories in general and people that hold them. I have concluded some people prefer to dabble in them. And we have had a lot of reason these days to give rise to conspiracies. Maybe they’re trendy and cool? The JFK thing, while decades old, is still a viable high water mark.

But for the last several years, there is another big one on the horizon. The moon landing. I might have been surprised at hearing that one many years ago. But it has a following. Of course there is now the 911 conspiracies, too. So there are many of them and they range from environment to government. But I have noticed a trend that for some people, if they carry one conspiracy they likely have several.

Now we saw the media for 2 and a half years promote the Russia Trump collusion conspiracy with little to base it on. And that there was no push back on it, even from some media, was astounding. But these are the same media people who lectured us about anything we said about Obama for the previous eight years that we were crazy. Actually, the truth was much crazier than fiction. Now it turns out some of those conspiracies were not so crazy after all. They have now been validated by the facts.

Suffice it to say that if you traveled off of the central narratives the media was carrying in the Obama years, you were labeled a conspiracy nut. It was their enforcement mechanism to try to coral people on their main narrative — constructed also in tandem with the White House and West Wing. They, the media, didn’t mind doing it either. They were as heavily invested in creating the narrative as the Obama administration was. But anyone who ventured outside that narrative was the enemy, and they usually let you know it, using all the tools of the mainstream media.

You were mocked, ridiculed, ostracized and marginalized, attacked, humiliated, ruined, and robbed of your good reputation and character. In other words, you were destroyed if you were not on their bandwagon of misinformation. To call that a conspiracy theory was, well, Orwellian. It was 1984-ish. To think in terms of questioning Obama or their carefully crafted narrative was sedition and treasonous. It was as if we completely lost the press. And we did, though it was right from the beginning.

I don’t know if conspiracies represent a threat, given the amount of people that buy into them? But the moon one sort of stunned me. It sneaked up over the last 20 years. If it is cool or whatever that still puzzles me. Though now the left has demonstrated the real danger of a conspiracy with the Russia thing. They’ve shown how you can push a narrative whether it is believable or not. And they showed what mainstreaming conspiracy theories looks like.

You know, it is normally those on the margins who buy into a conspiracy. Now I am back to thinking about what the real point of them is. This Russia one was a matter of convenience and extreme importance, cooked up for convenience and served to masses as established fact. (Intelligence agencies like CIA know how to do that) If it is possible to push a fake narrative until it is mainstream, then what about skeptics who don’t believe in it?. Those who require proof or evidence… or doesn’t that even matter anymore?

Can a conspiracy theory be totally false, yet who cares that it is not true? And what would it take to rupture that huge conspiracy? It went on for over 2 and half years and still goes on. We are in a whole new realm. The Moon landing might have been an achievement for conspiracies but we have gone way past the dark side of the moon now.

Maybe the only point that matters is who believes in it and who doesn’t? To say nothing about the scenario of media and government teaming up on a conspiracy theory.

You can now call me conspiratorial but that is where we are at now. Who exactly believes in it? You would have been considered a wacko-bird for saying Obama was not born in America. But if you want to think the President is a Russian agent, then you would be welcomed by mainstream media and elites alike. It might help your career.

Strange how this conspiracy thing really works, isn’t it? In fact, lets go out of our way to avoid all the evidence to the contrary. And let’s go way out to block real facts and truth as it comes out. No need for that! Which one will write history? I think I know.

Right Ring | Bullright

A Helping Hand to Democrat Candidates

I apologize here but I’m beginning to feel sorry for Democrat candidates.

CNN talked to Terry McAuliffe about Trump and 2020. He said Democrat candidates, besides demagoguing the Trump agenda, should tell people what they are going to do on the issues. You know, what they are going to do to fix the mess Dems say we are in.

So, against my better judgment, I’m going to help by saying what they are going to do, if elected. Because they are so busy attacking Trump, I’ll say it for them.

They are going to:

  • Raise your taxes (repeatedly)
  • Give illegal aliens free healthcare.
  • Give everyone free healthcare – institute healthcare tax to offset costs.
  • Give illegal aliens free college tuition.
  • Give everyone free college education.
  • Restructure the Supreme Court, so it is forever stacked for liberals.
  • Abolish ICE.
  • Abolish or drastically reduce the Department of Homeland Security. Break it up at least so agencies cannot talk to and coordinate with each other.
  • Eliminate any walls on the border.
  • Hook up any illegal immigrants with our welfare system immediately.
  • Provide amnesty or citizenship to illegal aliens here now.
  • Spend much more in Latin America to fix countries so people will not want to come.
  • Re-politicize the DOJ. Construct barriers to firing anyone for due cause.
  • Eliminate charter schools because parents and children cannot have a choice.
  • Raise minimum wage to 15 dollars.
  • Convert our healthcare system into single payer Medicare for all.
  • Eliminate private health insurance.
  • Enact the ‘assault weapons’ ban
  • Expand national gun control over all guns and ammunition.
  • Remove names or statues of anyone tied to anything we deem offensive.
  • Give reparations to African Americans.
  • Pass laws against white structural racism rampant in our country.
  • Remove funding from the military to apply it toward our domestic programs.
  • Outlaw coal and oil development and target those companies in the sector.
  • Lower the national voter age to 16.
  • Remove any limitations on abortion with national laws.
  • Reenact the death tax.
  • Raise federal taxes on wealthy to 70% on an upward scale from there.
  • Repeal the entire Tax cut legislation.
  • Open immigration to all who want to come. No one is denied entry.
  • Cut police forces and any government subsidies they receive.
  • Cut border patrol.
  • Release 1/3 of all inmates from prison. Close a third of our prisons.
  • Return the right to vote to all ex-cons.
  • Let all residents of any city or town have the right to vote.
  • Reenter Paris Accord, whatever the cost, with savings from our military.
  • Enact the Green New Deal.
  • Reestablish the Iran deal. (consider penalty funds to Iran)
  • Stop all money and aid to Israel. Increase all aid to Palestine.
  • Politicize the EPA and then have them write the strictest most restrictive environmental and economic limitations known to man.

 

Well, it’s only a start since it is still early in the campaign. I know this is a pretty extensive and aggressive list, but they are up to it. And a little publicity goes a long way.

Right Ring | Bullright

Warren Goes Tactical Stupid

Some people thought Elizabeth Warren was more rationale? She nuked that myth.

The Hill
“Warren, Bullock spar over ‘no first use’ nuclear policy”

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Montana Gov. Steve Bullock (D) sparred Tuesday night over her proposed “no first use” policy on nuclear weapons during the Democratic debate.

In defending the proposed policy, Warren argued for diplomatic and economic solutions to conflict, saying “we should not be asking our military to take on jobs that do not have a military solution.”

But Bullock opposed that proposal, saying, “I don’t want to turn around and say, ‘Well, Detroit has to be gone before we would ever use that.’”

Warren is the lead sponsor of the Senate version of a bill that would make it U.S. policy not to use nuclear weapons first.

It has long been the policy of the United States that the country reserves the right to launch a preemptive nuclear strike.

Former President Obama reportedly weighed changing the policy before leaving office, but ultimately did not after advisers argued doing so could embolden adversaries.

What morons. Naturally Obama thought about it — read: really wanted to but was stopped by advisors. So no speed bumps for Elizabeth Warren though. She wants to grant a ‘privilege of first strike‘ to our enemies and enshrine it into national policy.

Gee, I wonder what we get in return? Dare I ask.

Know Your Enemies

It’s absolutely necessary to know the enemy of US and freedom itself. Ignorance is no alibi. The left doesn’t care. In fact they are in bed with them, pushing the same agenda.

Documentary Details of Muslim Brotherhood Effort to Dominate America

IPT News
by John Rossomando |July 8, 2019

Editor’s Note: Muslim Brotherhood activist Nidal Mohamed Sakr’s presence in the United States was first discovered by Joe Kaufman in a 2018 Front Page Magazine article. Kaufman uncovered Sakr’s work in the Muslim Brotherhood, his relationship with Osama bin Laden and Sakr’s 2017 social media post threatening President Trump. Kaufman created the image showing Sakr in a suit and at what appears to be a rally that is shown in Horowitz’s video.

A new short documentary by filmmaker Ami Horowitz gives an inside glimpse of what Muslim Brotherhood members really think. Horowitz traveled to Beirut, Istanbul, Cairo and California to speak with activists, as well as members on the streets in Egypt.

Horowitz expected Brotherhood members to be cagey, since the organization generally is secretive. But he told the Investigative Project on Terrorism (IPT) they were candid. Muslim Brotherhood members generally do not admit they belong to the group, even in the Middle East.

“What I found when I sat down with them, and I’ve spoken with dozens of them, is that they’re very open about what their plans are and what they want to do,” Horowitz said.

Brotherhood operatives like to say they are part of different organizations from country to country. However, Horowitz found that many of them knew each other and had similar goals despite coming from different countries. The Brotherhood’s ultimate goal is a global Islamic state.

“They were all from disparate parts of the world, and they all knew one another,” Horowitz told the IPT. “They all went to certain meetings that they all kind of attended … I found that when you scratch the surface and get behind the veneer that the connection between them is less murky.”

Horowitz has made videos and movies for the past 12 years. This film was privately financed and is available for viewing at no charge. …/

See IPT https://www.investigativeproject.org/7979/documentary-details-muslim-brotherhood-effort-to

From video:

“A revolution is coming. It’s not going to be green. It’s not going to be peaceful like Arab Spring, I guarantee you that.”

It almost sounds like Bernie Sanders, sans the non-green talk.

According to Mo Bro activists: It’s not terrorism it is heroism.

Watch this close-up mini-documentary. Who knows how long it will be up there?
Just couple that sentiment with three or four congressional radicals.

Mo Bro is the common denominator. Better know your enemies; they know you.

Defense In Motion

Over a week ago, I was prepared to say I had given up on even the remotest idea of Hillary ever being held accountable. It seemed the one thing we can count on today beside taxes is Hillary walking away. Not much public confidence in justice out there.

Then came word that Durham’s office was staffing up and already conducting interviews. Then came DOJ’s announcement that Barr was doing a broad investigation. (I do like the term broad in there) And he said he was examining CIA. All right then.

So now I see a little hope in an otherwise bleak tunnel. What is there to base that hope on? I have no answer, just asking. I guess we have to hang on for the long ride, again.

Along comes the duck and cover media. George Stephanhoopla does an interview with Trump. He asks the only thing they care about — the whole reason for the interview. Suppose someone from a foreign government offers you information , would you (A)take it or (B)call FBI? So only two choices? Well, Trump said maybe you do both. Immediately the buzzers declare “wrong answer.”

Media also claims that type of information pedaling can influence elections and “undermines our democracy.” Then can we have any country left after what Hillary did? We know the details of what she did, no need to dredge through all that.

I’ll be darned, a whole interview to get that plus a new AF-1 design? But that’s all the press needed. It happens to be the same time Donald Trump Jr is speaking to the Senate, again, on that very subject. That’s not the only coincidence for George’s question of the year.

We can see a foundation forming for the defense of Hillary “the rotten” Clinton. That question is the critical predicate of it. Have everyone agree taking information is bad, calling FBI is the only answer. Then they will say that is what Hillary’s campaign did.

That defense is almost laughable after everything she did. But it is supposed to get her off the treasonous hook. (taking foreign information is treason) It is more than a defense for Hillary; it’s one for intelligence and everyone else too. So when they get nailed, they can claim to be working or cooperating with FBI, intelligence and the investigation. Media will then call them all heroes not traitors. Yep, that’s their defense coming down the pike.

Actually, George Stephanopoulos’ interview could be labeled opposition research. Though at what point in all this does press’s information pedaling become treasonous?

Right Ring | Bullright

Losing Our Posterity

Some percentage of people may have had an idealistic childhood and memories of it. There are others today who might think many people are romancing their childhoods too much. There is plenty of nostalgia around to lend credibility to the “golden days of yesteryear” concept. There’s also reason to think some people resent that.

As this debate goes back and forth, some also worry what the future will bring for our posterity? If you witnessed a decline to those good bygone days, you are not alone.

But liberals or progressives generally do not like us having a rose-colored view of the past. No, they lecture us about “moving forward.” In fact, they go out of their way to paint the past as the bad old days. Ripping out statues or old traditions are symptoms of their disdain. Now we even have politicians saying America was never that great.

So why bother stating all this? Because of the current debacle in Washington. We are very concerned about the security of our border, and illegal migration in particular. There sure is a split in left vs right over this. We hear anecdotes from the left romancing “historical immigration” as a sacred altar. Odd for people that look at America as mostly bad in the past to sing praises on immigration. That’s another matter.

The theories and skepticism about the impacts of this “illegal immigration” – invasion — continues on both sides. Why does it seem one side is in favor of it, embracing open borders, while the other side sees plenty of harm in the policies? That is another good question. I’d like to stay with their positions for a moment.

The progressive left wants this flow of undocumented people to continue. They don’t seem too concerned about the ballooning numbers either, or chain migration policies. None of those negatives seem to matter. Wearing blinders, they only want to see positives.

We know elections and politics are a big factor in their borderless rationale. And that brings us to the census question of citizenship the Left has itself in knots about. If illegals can’t vote in federal elections, legally, yet, then why are Leftinistas so adamant about not counting their non-citizen status? The higher the population in an area, the more representatives it can get. There’s one goal of the left laid bare.

But I suggest illegal immigration in huge numbers is a destabilizing force. Who would want that? Again, in my opinion, I’d say the left realizes that too. However, one of their goals could be to destabilize the country. Could the left want to destabilize the South especially? That would be in keeping with their vendetta of animosity against the South. It would be payback for a lot of reasons. But it also works politically to destabilize the South, by dividing people. Ever think about that?

Slowly they are trying to destroy any “myth” — as they call it — of the good old days. This destabilization and population change puts distance between that past and today onward. Thus, why they are not concerned about the huge numbers in the invasion. They like the consequences. That in turn would effect our posterity going forward. It also helps kill off any legacy of the South. I’ll take my theory over the law of unintended consequences.

Right Ring | Bullright

Now that Mueller’s Report is out, I can’t feel any relief

Trips down memory lane are not always positive or don’t always end that way.

Now that the report is out, I can’t feel any relief. It should be relief that it is over but it isn’t because it goes on and on. It is meant to continue ad nauseam.

Why did they do an exhaustive investigation on Russia’s election meddling without talking about what Obama did? But they can talk about every detail of what Trump did?

Weeks ago, Comey the persistent talked about “so many questions.After the Report, he says “so many answers.” I think he has it exactly backwards. We knew so much before the report came out. Now that it is published it poses so many questions. The jig is up.

Why haven’t those who committed offenses been brought to justice? Like Brennan, Clapper, Strzok, Glenn Simpson, Steele, Comey, McCabe? And don’t think we forgot about it; what was all the unmasking by Obama officials doing for it all? Where was Loretta Lynch when all this was going on? What about meetings between DOJ officials and Obama in the Oval Office, like on January 5th 2017?

But if you follow mainstream media’s lead now, this report information is all so important. It is alarming. All this should bother you and me. This influence of Russia is so severe that Blumenthal now says our democracy is under siege, still is, and that it is an act of war. And then prizewinner congresswoman Jackie Speier says that it shows we would actually not have Trump as President but for Russia’s actions. Talk about a dramatic stretch.

So in my hypothetical mind, I’m trying to figure out if Russia was that influential and the deciding factor in 2016, then I have a few questions. It represents Russia as winning. Doesn’t it make our democracy fragile? Haven’t you given Russia way too much credit? And if Speier thinks that Russia succeeded, then whom did they beat? Wasn’t the guy who was in the Oval Office responsible for what they did? So why is the blame coming down on an outsider, incoming president?

Now Comey has another seismic revelation about “so many answers.” What are they? How does Trump being pissed off about appointing a Special Counsel answer any questions? Sure he would be mad that they would do that to him. He was only in office for months. What the hell is there really to investigate in the White House if this is about Russia?

When I was much younger, I remember people would wait for the next new phrase or word to be coined so that they could run out and start using it. Well, it seemed like they were just waiting for the next one. You know them all, slang and urban lingo. Using the lingo made one seem popular or cool.

One of the things some of those trendier people would do is travel to another area and use their newly slung slang to others there to see if it was popular, and so it could hopefully be picked up as cool. Sometimes it worked and sometimes it didn’t. Sometimes people looked at them and said “what did you say?” Language is like a joke, if you have to explain it then it’s a dud and falls flat.

Comey is like one of those guys trying to set a trend. Get everyone to repeat something, whether they know the meaning of it or not. This would prove him hip and popular. He is desperate. He wants to be right even when he’s wrong – a thinker and an artisan.

Seems to me mainstream media is a lot like that too. Just get everyone repeat a bunch of nonsense so it can seem like a popular thought or idea. And that does work many times. Minions repeat the talking points of the Left with amazing clarity and regularity, right to the phraseology. Well, it is almost a dialect.

But then eventually one learns that the language is not really the thing to control, the dialogue is. Whoever controls that wins the game.

When Comey was pondering “so many questions,” he insinuated that there were so many questions to be asked. But not any we didn’t already know the answers to. The only relevant questions left were “why aren’t people in jail and why are these corrupt people still in their top tier jobs?” We wanted to know who was doing this witch hunt “investigation” and why? The who is almost easier than the why.

So many questions.

Other than that, we didn’t want to know about some setup meeting in Trump Tower with a Russian who was collaborating and working with Simpson – months before the election. We weren’t asking what Flynn was doing before or after Trump took office? Those were planted questions. We weren’t hanging on the edge of our seats wondering who spoke to a Russian and exactly what they said, word for word?

We might have long wondered that if all this was going on since 2014, then what did that last president do about it? If he did nothing, why not? What was he waiting for? What was the answer to the probing Russia problem? If all these officials had a degree of certainty what was going on, then what did they do and/or why didn’t they do something? You know, those kind of pertinent questions. And we didn’t need all the drama about the inner workings of Trump’s campaign about what they were doing.

Do you smell the deflection and diversion?

Well, only if this entire thing was a setup from the beginning, aimed at Trump, would we need to know all that. We should have wondered what Obama did to stop it, or why not? We should have wondered what did Obama know and when did we know it? See, so many things just don’t make sense like a language barrier.

A naïve person may wonder why such a barrier exists?

But most of us know, because they want to rearrange our language and thoughts about it. In other words, they want to change our perception of events. Normally that is called revision, only they were trying to do it in real time. Before we could know or understand events as they happened, they wanted to train our thoughts to see them in another way, through an alternative reality. And they wanted us to believe it and not what we were seeing or what we already knew. It does sound a lot like Benghazi too.

See, Obama was already skilled in the art of controlling the dialogue or manipulating events for his benefit. In fact, there was a certain pride in being able to do that. To this day, if you mention Benghazi or Hillary’s servergate, you get the same tired response from the left. “Oh, there were multiple investigations about that and it found nothing.” Nothing? Really? People died and yet there was no problem with it and nothing sinister. With Hillary they say “but you cannot let it go. She was investigated and cleared of any wrong doing.” Right, cleared? Remember how the video caused Benghazi, a spontaneous attack?

Notice what they did in both those cases. They immediately began to try to control the narrative, since narrative is all that matters. They substitute an alternate narrative and spread it far and wide. The saturation point is when someone mentions the event and hoards of people immediately respond with the same promoted answer.

So Comey now says, “so many answers.” Naturally that is what he sees, answers to what happened, when it really gives you none. What we got were alternative sound bites substituted for answers that tell you nothing. But yet they are not done because they tell us they are going to continue this investigation, now in Congress. They call the Mueller Report a “roadmap for Congress”. Was that how it worked for Hillary or Benghazi? Of course not. The investigation was supposed to be the definitive end.

Answers, Comey? McCabe also did his first interview, since his book, on MSNBC. He said the same thing, agreeing that Mueller’s Report was a “roadmap” for congress to use and follow. A roadmap to where? Yes, we know that too. Another answer it provided.

But the real questions still exist, just as they did while they rolled this charade out, but concentrate on their substituted answers. Because the real questions are about them and not Trump. And they are about Obama’s administration.

Well, one can conclude the whole ordeal was used as a coverup, which is still going on, for Obama and Hillary. It was a convenient use of Russia meddling to hang it around Trump and pretend he is the problem, while they wall off an entire warehouse of abuses from the public under Obama’s administration. But this placeholder is wearing very thin. In fact, it is hard to believe they could have kept this entire thing up as long and hard as they have. It is now going into the next election cycle. Of course this Report will also provide opposition material against Trump. But that is what it was all along from the beginning.

Obama found a use for another problem, Russia, to use it against his opponent, and cover up all his other problems. Meanwhile, Obama’s personal records are sealed from public while all Trump’s personal records are to be annexed, and then spread far and wide to the public. Funny how these truth-challenged people don’t care about the real answers.

Right Ring | Bullright

Some People

“Some people did something,” says Rep Ilhan Omar. Then came her victim tweet:

Some people were radical Islamist Muslims. Something was the 9/ll Attacks — killing over 3000 with over 16,000 Ground Zero responders, to date.

Resulting in the Memorial of Something, I guess. A crying shame.

And she is a victim accusing us of incitement? Condemn our remarks?

On the other hand, Cair was labeled as an unindicted co-conspirator group.

Victim card revoked.

“Something”…..like an act of war.

*Ref: https://www.investigativeproject.org/documents/case_docs/423.pdf

Omar Spins Congress Like A Top

For what it is worth. Ilhan Omar can talk and complain but she can’t hide.

She spins the entire thing to about her and her plight She spins antisemitism.

But she gets some push back

What part of antisemitism doesn’t she get? All of it. That’s who she is.

Why is her voice any more important than all the others?

Bernie Explosion

As expected, Bernie announces that he is once again running for president. Of course he is, did anyone doubt it? He could not “resist.”

Skip his other statements, the one I care about is when he said he wants to radically transform America “economically and politically.” No kidding?

While we may have figured that, he is now boldly telling us in case we weren’t sure or living under a rock. And he expects that to be a selling point to rally the base.

This is not a good thing. I am way past the laughing and mockery stage. It is serious.

I will cut to the chase of my conclusion to save anyone the agony. I am not being glib or pessimistic here. The downfall of the US will be entirely the fault of the Left — or whatever name you want to call them. You know what that means? They can cause it by themselves.

Why that matters? Because I mean they can single-handedly destroy America even regardless of what we do, not withstanding extreme measures that might come about.

Sorry, that means something to me. I don’t know about anyone else. That would make us merely passengers on a train. That may not be fair or right but this is the way I see it. I like to think I gave it some thought to reach that conclusion.

Here is a fair question to ponder: will there ever be a point when the Left is too extreme or radical even for Democrats? I don’t like the answer. There are a couple different ways you can ask that question with the same inevitable answer. No.

Imagine JFK reading this news in the newspaper.

Right Ring | Bullright

Borderless Democrats At Your Service

Once again, it is time for one of those rantoramas. At times one cannot control the frustration or disdain even to write a persuasive piece. So instead, I get to say just what I think. And someone really wants us to feel helpless about our circumstances.

I am so sick and tired of this issue of illegal invasion. It has been on the stove for now thirteen plus years. That means it is under the third different administration. Words may escape me in how wrong this all is. At least I know I am not alone in my frustration.

Another thing has become crystal clear. That is if we the people, I mean the sane ones, all know what should be done to stem this problem, then why can’t our illustrious Reps and Senators in Washington do it. I mean this is what we pay them and elect them for, to handle the business of the country. Why is that so difficult for them to do? Back up, their job is not to just tell us what we cannot do or shouldn’t. And many of them are the ones who broke the system in the first and second place.

Excuse me, I must concentrate on these lily liberal, progressive dirtbags here. Yes, I have had it up to my neck too with people saying but it is both sides that are culpable. Stop with that, we know where the real problems come from. Sure there are a few stragglers in the Republican ranks with their own selfish agendas. I’ve talked about that before. But can we finally admit and concentrate on the real problem here?

We may have questioned progressives’ agenda before and called them this or that. We may have even called them UN-American. Now they have upped that in case we missed it.They are plainly Anti-American now. Yes, they have destruction of America as we know it in their sights. Yes, they realize it. And never have they been closer to that goal than at this moment in history, to carry out the demise of our Republic and they are firing from all points. We actually do have a civil war raging on in the country, just by other means, only we aren’t calling it that. These perennial post-American pols antagonize it.

There can be no doubt now about their goal. They’ve told us as much and admitted it. They don’t bother trying to hide or deny it anymore. And that replacement of our entire system is the vehicle by which they will carry out their plans. It was all set up by Obama. We knew it at the time. But all our complaints for eight years that they tried like hell to deny are all being validated in spades. Now it is more like if you like your country you cannot keep your country. It’s called screw America 101.

There are dirtbags and detours every where you look. I like metaphors as much as the next guy to really drive a point home but in this case we don’t need metaphors anymore. Reality is quite bad enough. No, we are not going to play Democrats’ other parlor game of ‘blame Trump because he is president now, so it must be his fault!’ That is as bad as the “both sides” nonsense. He is the one constant fighting it.

I am wondering when it is time for amnesty for Americans, well, just because we if anyone deserve it? We are now last on the list of considerations, it is obviously clear. The ruling class has other matters on their minds, frankly, anything other than us. No, you cannot say that about most Republicans. But you can say it about Democrats. They don’t care about us. In fact, it seems like we are being penalized while everyone else is being rewarded or promoted. Is that their real dream? That seems to be part of their grand justice platform.

And don’t even start me with their social justice bullshit. It’s not social and it sure isn’t justice they want. It is revenge and selective retribution and redistribution they want.

Our priorities are at the very bottom of their list, from securing the border to having a fair justice system, to having respect for law and order. Nope, those things are the antithesis to what they want. So we lose, too bad. The least one needs to do is acknowledge who his/her real enemies are. And they are right there. In fact, they are in our faces almost everyday running to their media appearances and making their declarations from on high. Or they are in hearing rooms representing their own selfish interests, in front of cameras rubbing it in our faces. There is a certain honesty about it all, at least we know they don’t care. And they are proud of it. We are back where we were in 2010, but even worse off.

They will trot out to the campaign trail because they have decided that the only thing of utmost importance is elections. So many of the Reps and Senators are running now, They are part timers. Their real gig is just running for office, sort of like Hillary’s always was. The job itself? They get to decide that, too, not the Constitution or rules. But we are last on their long list of self-serving priorities. Illegal aliens, even those on their way here, somehow get top billing on their considerations. Come one come all.

They’ve given up, long ago, on the idea that they stand up for the working guy. He’s at the bottom of their list, too. Actually, he is much the problem because he is inconvenient to all their other pipe dreams of a Green Economy and a workless society. One where government is in control of everything… and yet responsible for nothing at the same time. They say they are not interested in corporate businesses but they are. Boy are they. They are in their pockets and have their hand out in front of them. It is like old Jesse Jackson’s routine of a shakedown city. Corporate greed is only the means to grease their palms and fleece their campaign coffers. You are an enemy to the state unless you prove otherwise.

The fact that all of this is so blatantly obvious now to us means nothing to them. So it creates contention between us and our representatives. You think they care? They just want to be the permanent ruling class elites. Your value as a pawn in that scheme matters not in the least. They will tell you what is important to them, and they’ll demonstrate it right it front of you. Those principles to you — securing the border, protecting sovereignty, doing the people’s business, honoring an oath of office — are toilet tissue to them.

The next election is all that matters. Always the next election. One thing unimportant during the perpetual campaign cycle, to Democrats, is the will of the people. That is fungible. It is whatever they declare it is. See how the working guy would definitely be at odds with that agenda? These things, common principles, used to be important but that is so 50 years ago. Gone is any illusion of integrity or responsibility.

But I was only getting started.

Right Ring | Bullright

The Great What If?

Just allow Victor Davis Hanson to walk you through a meticulous ‘what if’ scenario of Obama in place of Trump being investigated. The details are chilling.

All one has to do is plug in all the relevant factors and apply them to Obama. It is a laborious task but someone had to do it. Don’t let your jaw fall on the floor.

Should the FBI Run the Country?

By Victor Davis Hanson | January 20th, 2019 | American Greatness

Since the media would doubtless answer that loaded question, “It depends on the president,” let us imagine the following scenario.

Return to 2008, when candidate Barack Obama had served only about three years in the U.S. Senate, his sum total of foreign policy experience. And he was running against the overseas old-hand, decorated veteran, and national icon John McCain—a bipartisan favorite in Washington, D.C.

During the campaign, unfounded rumors had swirled about the rookie Obama that he might ease sanctions on Iran, distance the United States from Israel, and alienate the moderate Arab regimes, such as the Gulf monarchies and Egypt.

Stories also abounded that the Los Angeles Times had suppressed the release of a supposedly explosive “Khalidi tape,” in which Obama purportedly thanked the radical Rashid Khalidi for schooling him on the Middle East and correcting his earlier biases and blind spots, while praising the Palestinian activist for his support for armed resistance against Israel.

Even more gossip circulated that photos existed of a smiling Barack Obama with Louis Farrakhan, the Black Muslim extremist and radical pro-Gaddafi patron, who in the past had praised Adolf Hitler and reminded the Jews again about the finality of being sent to the ovens. (A photo of a smiling Obama and Farrakhan did emerge, but mysteriously only after President Obama left office).

Imagine that all these tales in 2008 might have supposedly “worried” Bush lame-duck and pro-McCain U.S. intelligence officials, who informally met to discuss possible ways of gleaning more information about this still mostly unknown but scary Obama candidacy.

But most importantly, imagine that McCain’s opposition researchers had apprised the FBI of accusations (unproven, of course) that Obama had improperly set up a private back-channel envoy to Iran in 2008. Supposedly, Obama was trying secretly to reassure the theocracy (then the object of Bush Administration and allied efforts to ratchet up pressures to prevent its acquisition of nuclear weapons) of better treatment to come. The conspiratorial accusation would imply that if Iran held off Bush Administration pressures, Tehran might soon find a more conducive atmosphere from an incoming Obama Administration. …/

Continue reading https://amgreatness.com/2019/01/20/should-the-fbi-run-the-country/

 

Okay, what would happen? Safe to say there would be some reacting going on along with some outrage. For a while, I have been asking one irritating question. Do tell us:

Since they have been busy trying to give us reasons why this investigation took place and attempting to explain that process; then where was the investigation on Obama? Now someone has filled in many of those blanks with this scenario. Does FBI run the country?

Pelosi’s Quid Pro Quo

It’s the optics stupid. Well, after Pelosi denies Trump’s SOTUS she gets a surprise.

Trump denies Pelosi aircraft for foreign trip, after call for State of the Union delay

By Brooke Singman, Chad Pergram, John Roberts | Fox News

President Trump on Thursday abruptly denied military aircraft to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi for a foreign trip just minutes before the congressional delegation was set to depart, in a stunning decision that followed her call to delay the State of the Union address amid the government shutdown.

In a curt letter, Trump said her trip has been “postponed.”

“Due to the Shutdown, I am sorry to inform you that your trip to Brussels, Egypt, and Afghanistan has been postponed. We will reschedule this seven-day excursion when the Shutdown is over. In light of the 800,000 great American workers not receiving pay, I am sure you would agree that postponing this public relations event is totally appropriate,” Trump wrote.

“I also feel that, during this period, it would be better if you were in Washington negotiating with me and joining the Strong Border Security movement to end the Shutdown. Obviously, if you would like to make your journey by flying commercial, that would certainly be your prerogative.”

More: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-denies-pelosi-aircraft-for-foreign-trip-in-response-to-call-for-state-of-the-union-delay

Looks like Pelosi may be flying the friendly skies in commercial, or not at all. Or maybe Nancy could just do a nice conference call instead.

In Retrospect: MLK Revisited

There is a lonely phrase in MLK’s “I have a dream” speech.

“You have been the veterans of creative suffering” — a line that preceded King’s more famous dream words.

So I know the context in which it was written. But I just can’t help seeing, in hindsight today, an even wider target for those words. There is a fertile audience.

There are a lot of “veterans of creative suffering” in our country today, maybe not in the same way. Granted to a lesser extent than King’s intent. Nevertheless, veterans of creative suffering… by the very government that was suppose to represent, stand for, and defend their rights.

When a government gives its own people the cold shoulder while at the same time gushes over the concerns of illegal aliens, even before they enter the country, then we have lost.

When securing our border is defiantly called an act of immorality, we have lost.

We have lost when a government by the people for the people has become a government against the people, and against its most vulnerable. We have become witnesses to it when a law like the freedom of information act is transposed into the Freedom From Information. When the objective “for the people” becomes for the self-serving politicians.

And this theme continues on in its incremental desire to control the people, not free them; to tread over them rather than lift them up; seeks to overcome and obstruct the people rather than remove obstacles in their way. A government that plots to remove obstacles in the way of an organized invasion, for the sake of their own political lust for power. A government that has over years encouraged this invasion.

When everyone else in the world is entitled to have a dream but the American people. And their dream supersedes our dream.

Creative suffering?

Right Ring | Bullright

Both Sides Of The Wall

You’ve heard of the wall Go Fund Me campaign and probably even heard media or Democrats critique it by fact or purpose, because that is what they do.

You probably also heard — it is not lost on the commie, Marxist or socialist Left — radicals already started a Go Fund Me of their own called “Ladders to Get Over Trump’s Wall.” And it has already raised 160k but yet always manages to say it’s trending.

But you should also now know about another fund and organization that existed even before the Wall fundraiser. It was called Raices. It is a 501c organization. (Guess they would never have a problem getting any 501 status)

Take it from the parent site of Ladders’ GFM: (which is where the donations flow)

“How are the donations going to be used?

“The funds will go toward legal representation for immigrant children and parents in Texas, as well as toward paying parents’ bond so they can be released from detention centers and reunited with their children. The organization — which currently has about 50 lawyers on staff — plans to go on a hiring spree and fund training for volunteer lawyers willing to travel to Texas to assist, Mr. Ryan said.” “

” LEAF – The Legal Representation, Advocacy, and Education (LEAF) Project will provide universal representation for released unaccompanied kids in Texas.”

But also the rub is here:

” Family Reunification and Bond Fund: FREE our Families – Parents separated from their children at the border (and other immigrants placed in detention) can’t get released from ICE custody to reunite with their families until they pay the full amount of their immigration bond. Bonds are set at a MINIMUM of $1500, and are usually in the range of $5-10K, even for asylum seekers without any criminal history. This fund will directly support legal services for detained separated parents and the direct funding for bonds to get parents released. “

You should also know how it is doing. And from a Texas paper I won’t name:

“The massive fundraising effort on Facebook aims to help reunite children with their parents. The campaign, created June 16, has raised more than $16.8 million. “

So it’s already been pretty active on low radar, raising money. How is it doing it?

The fundraiser has also been matched up to $360,000 by private donors. The goal of the fundraiser is currently set at $20 million. “

Get that? The wall has just eclipsed the amount Raices raised. I suppose they are mad. Heck, they could have raised money without using The Wall campaign for a fundraiser.

You see what they are doing? Paying for all the bonds of the illegals so they can make bond and go their way. With the publicity, word is out to encourage more people to come.

So the message that I get from this is that they are directly funding an invasion against our country. That is what is going on, no matter how they want to spin it. They are paying. And they are promising all comers they will pay their legal freight and release bonds.

Now something else worth noting here is that they even boast that they are doing a big hiring spree to grow the 50 plus lawyers they have. I believe they operate predominately in the Texas area. But heck, they want to expand as much and as quick as possible.

Get all that? While we are trying to step down and reduce the illegal invasion, they are trying to step it up by their efforts. Nice people, they assist and pay illegals to break in.

But it is also a one stop shop for legal representation and activism or lobby efforts, to encourage (more) illegals. Take it from their mouths:

“In the most generous interpretation of the stories coming to light, U.S. Border Patrol and the Department of Health and Human Services are *abjectly terrible* at their jobs. In the more likely interpretation: they don’t particularly care about reuniting these families. Regardless of motivation, the result is the same: the government of the United States is actively preventing these families from being made whole.

RAICES and the organizations they are partnering with are going to need a lot more than a bond fund. They’re going to need a lot more than a few pro bono attorneys. They need a legion of lawyers, psychologists, child advocates, investigators. They need you calling your elected officials EVERY. SINGLE. DAY. about this. They need you talking to everyone you know about this. And they will need it for a very long haul.

As their closer to prod activists to help promote them and their mission of invasion:

After you’re done reading this story — please commit to this cause. Share it with your Facebook friends. Talk about it at the dentist and in the grocery checkout line. Bring it to church and synagogue and mosque and any other temple of values and morals in your life. Google incessantly for your local charities that work with the Office of Refugee Resettlement and sign up to help tomorrow. Let every day of your life be a day where you have remembered these families and done something about it.

These kids have to be more than a moment for us — they have to be a movement. The only people who can fix this are the people of the United States of America.

Hear that? Let it sink in real good. It’s not a punch line. NO, the people who can fix this are the people and governments in the countries they are coming from. So when these people get hurt, killed or disappear on the long route here for the free treatment, will this organization be held responsible? And what about that Logan Act now?

“Kids have to be more…. they have to be a movement.” So we all need to fund and keep this movement alive is the only logical deduction you can make from this, using the kids. And you see the clear demonization of our public, government officials and border patrol. They are actively working against our immigration system.

Now if you listen to the left, they are furious we are talking about a border wall and donating to fund it. E-gads, do you see what we are up against? This should cause anyone to run over to the Go Fund Me for the wall to make a donation. (even small ones)

Would you like one more kicker for the road, if that wasn’t offensive enough? I looked at “Ladders for Illegals” GFM page at the top donor link. What do you think I saw? The top thousand dollar donation is from “Go Fund Me team.” A kick start gift? But nice they stepped in to help out their noble efforts! So their plan is 20 million but you know that will turn into their ground floor and they’ll need to raise even so much more.

I guess that is why the urgent plea to call and write your reps to push their cause. What’s next? Oh, Democrats will find creative ways to help fund the cause, I’m sure. You know Democrats and funding, they know the ropes and because rules or laws don’t usually pertain to them. (or aren’t enforced.)

So before long, if not already, Dems will have ways to fund this whole border invasion scheme. (Gov money?) You thought “catch and release” was bad enough.

Granted this is not the only exclusive leg of funding directly available to illegals. Imagine other large orgs doing similar things. But you heard them, they are very ambitious to do much more. I’m sure word is out too, all the way to Guatemala and Honduras by now. How long before Americans are funding their own out of control invasion? Not long!

Well, until the funds get rolling in, which is all it is ever about to Democrats, they give you helpful things you should tell renegade Reps in your activism, to keep their efforts going.

Things you should ask of your representatives:

1. Where do you stand on this issue?

2. What are you doing right now to reverse this policy?

3. Urge them to vote against legislation that does more harm than good.

4. When is the town hall on this issue? (Not if, but WHEN)

All that persistent reminding to reps will signify how important this is to progressive leftists. You can guarantee they will get attention too, in more than words.

Incidentally, you will also notice if you look into any of their information, just as the GFM page on Ladders for Illegals, that anyone who dares oppose or disagree with their mission/agenda is a racist. For example the bottom of the update page reads

Questions? Concerns? Misspelled remarks full of racist vitriol you’d like to pass along? Find me at cmclymer .

Also: kudos to Nancy Levine and other advocates who have set up similar satirical fundraising for RAICES at /gofundthewall.net

Notice at the end a plug for “Go Fund The Wall”.net, leading to their main site. Great for co-opting search engines and Google. What is really satirical?

See blatant attack calling people racist and white supremacist? Guess they know nothing about La Raza -“the Race”.

We still think the wall is a ridiculous idea borne out of the tragic fear inherent in white supremacy, and we all must do what we can to demand the United States be a society that doesn’t turn away any human being fleeing violence and persecution.

A wall must never be built, and our undocumented siblings must be recognized as part of our larger American family and given the dignity and respect accorded any human being.

Speak up. Register to vote. End white supremacy.

Can you open your window and scream “Open Borders!!!” at the top of your lungs?

Read between the lines: the only sure way to show you are not a racist is donate and be on the safe side, for the record. A naysayer or disagree? You’re a friggin’ racist!

Yet many of these gentile humanitarians are the same ones who have been heckling, threatening and attacking Kolfage for what he is doing. You can read at the Wall site the names and things he was called. Vile stuff about being an amputee. (maybe if only he was from Honduras or illegal, instead of a patriotic vet?)

Are Americans and groups now funding their own invasion of US? Borderless & lawless.

Hey hey, ho ho… time to build the wall, ho ho!

Right Ring | Bullright

Oath To Tough Talk On Border Wall

Since we all know just what we are talking about, here is the Senate’s Oath of Office:

“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God.”

If Senator Schumer or Speaker Pelosi wants to protest their oath, he or she can resign.

There are two distinct issues in this whole scenario: one is the wall and securing the border; and two is the status of Government in this partial shutdown mode.

But Pelosi and Schumer only recognize one as a problem, the government shutdown. Now what is extremely ironic is that they only care about opening government when the first basic, functional duty of that Government is to secure our borders and protect citizens.

No reservations.

Secondly that they took an oath — “freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion“– to “ defend the Constitution… against all enemies, foreign and domestic” The Constitution puts that central tenant of Government on protecting its borders, from invasion, as a priority function of their duties.

Now they don’t want to do that. They want to stand in the state of resistance, which is actually the state of Sedition. But that resistance is against the government of the US. Whether their base has lulled them into that position makes no difference. That is where they all stand. It comes down to either honoring their oath to defend the country or not. Their open-borders base does not want to defend the Constitution and makes no bones about their position of opposition to the administration and duly elected president.

So, by their own efforts, they are in a current state of sedition. That is what it is.

Thus Speaker Pelosi and Senator Schumer are aiding and abetting the enemy. They are also giving comfort to the broader enemies and invaders of the US, generally.

I found it fascinating how yesterday Nancy Pelosi was made Speaker and then swore in all the Dems by their oath. The skunk in the room was Democrats’ obvious ongoing state of protest with Trump, the administration and our national border security. Yet they stood their claiming to take that oath “without mental reservations.” Which one is it?

Are they proud card-carrying members of the Seditious, resistance Left or are they authentic members of the US Government — with no “purpose of evasion?” It does make sense though that the very first thing Nancy Pelosi would do as Speaker of the House is to defy her oath of office.(and then lead others) I mean it is what radicals do.

They either stand with the Sedition and their radicalized open-border, anti-American base of subversive miscreants… or honor their official sworn oath. But they cannot do both.

They did not take an oath to only make talking points and lies about some fictional “border security” illusion that lives only in their minds. And “technology” does not physically slow down invaders. How many invaders did their talking points repel? Actually, it undoubtedly encourages them. So, what is it about no “mental reservations” they do not understand?

God Bless America because the Left sure won’t.

Hey hey, ho ho… time to build the wall, ho ho!

Right Ring | Bullright

Physics Of The Border

The border does have a scientific solution. Its called physics.

Build the wall and secure the border. Don’t build the wall and don’t secure the border.

The problem is that all the technology and electronics do not slow down the invaders. For that it takes the laws of physics. And even using tear gas is only temporary.

Any invasion requires demands an opposite reaction. Like physical force. We have to physically stop or slow them. They call the wall medieval. It’s just science.

Democrats might have shot themselves in the foot with this shutdown standoff. They refuse to fund the wall. Actually, they refuse the wall, period. It is not a funding problem. It’s a will problem. But they don’t realize who they offended in the process.

They just made the wall the priority of the 2020 election. So Democrats are literally running against the wall. We win that debate. The science deniers have no argument.

It’s a physics problem. But then you cannot negotiate with people that cannot be trusted. Democrats spent 30 years proving they constantly lie. It’s a shell game to them. They tell us “use gadgets and high-tech. Walls are offensive.” So we don’t want to offend or frustrate invaders. Why? The offend us and our border every day. Talking points solve nothing.

But Dems don’t want to apply laws of physics. So they are physics deniers. They tell us physics don’t work. We know what doesn’t work is not using them — or common sense.

Hey hey, ho ho… time to build the wall, ho ho!

Right Ring | Bullright

DuffelBlog on Trump, Mattis divorce

Some good satire involved here making for interesting reading.

Troops ask to live with Mattis after divorce is finalized

By Paul Sharpe |The DuffelBlog — December 28, 2018

WASHINGTON — Most troops caught in the middle of a domestic dispute that resulted in their father Jim Mattis filing for divorce say they hope they can live with him after this is all over, sources confirmed today.

Mattis filed for divorce from President Donald Trump last week, citing “irreconcilable differences” that stemmed from the cancellation of vacation plans in Syria, the president’s decision to send some of the kids to border school in October, and his well-known Diet Coke drinking problem.

Continue: https://www.duffelblog.com/2018/12/mattis-divorce-trump/

All righty then. And so it begins. I expect Democrats to be serving up extra portions of this, and not know where the satire ends and reality begins. (or miss the humor completely)

Who says Dems can’t go any lower?

I guess having a white Christmas or even “dreaming of” one is now racist too!?🎄

Notice how Democrats always need to “move on” from anything…..except racism.
And if you happen to laugh at that thought, then you too must be a racist.

 

But speaking of over the top liberal rhetoric in the last post — which turns out to be a bottomless pit to hell — comes this prize work in keeping with liberal tradition.

In other words, there is no such thing as too much or too far for aspiring Leftinistas.

This Michael Harriot of The Root tried desperately to probe the bottom. Then it was deleted. But that didn’t stop him from defending his lone, solitary “hope” later.

After taking the heat he comes back to defend his high hope from a critic:

Nope, no room for virtue signaling in that ballpark. He’s covering deep Left field.

I know, it’s like a game where the left trogs try to outdo each other on the old outrage meter. A practiced skill set; where there are no rules or accountability.

Then here we find out that San Fran Nan and Chuck the Schmucko must be twins separated at birth. Proof is in the pudding. Christmas Eve is so unifying.

Not to be outdone, Chelsea Clinton dabbles in her mother’s forte` of fraternizing with evil.
Call it a genetic gift to a real child prodigy.

Those eyes, don’t they just scream “dark side”?

Hey, let’s throw in the latest Obama slime news too for flavor. Susan Rice never disappoints in serving over-the-top hypocrisy and hyperbole with her lies.

Breitbart

Former Obama National Security Advisor Susan Rice [in a land where they are really never former anything] penned an OP-ED for the New York Times claiming Trump is a bigger threat than any foreign adversary.

NYT:

“The president couldn’t care less about facts, intelligence, military analysis or the national interest. He refuses to take seriously the views of his advisers, announces decisions on impulse and disregards the consequences of his actions. In abandoning the role of a responsible commander in chief, Mr. Trump today does more to undermine American national security than any foreign adversary. Yet no Republican in Congress is willing to do more than bleat or tweet concerns.” [Read]

Hey Suzie Q, there is a little matter of all that unmasking we’d like to talk to you about regarding this whole conspiracy you all cooked up. I know the demands on your time, with writing post-script memos to yourself that take a toll. But inquiring minds have a lot of questions about this national security struggle you seem to be having — along with Obama’s non-scandal record you all hallucinated.

(*In case the Dana Loesch link disappears, here is the original image. There’s a Lincolnesque quality about it.)

Right Ring | Bullright

Image of the Week

 

 

This one tells pretty much the whole story.

Or is that the Image of the Weak? 

Someone suffers from severe chronic wall phobia.

 

____________________________________________________________

While we are at it, let’s go with this James Woods for tweet of the week.

Hey, socialists, I got some “Baby, it’s cold outside” for you.