Nightmares Of Obama

In one brief moment yesterday, it all came rushing back to me about the many reasons we jettisoned Obama. But he ws back shouting his lectures again, to the voters.

Sure it took eight years to do it but looking back at that tells you all you need to know on how we got here. Thank goodness. It was a rough ride and now we are here.

Obama said a stupid, childish thing like “Tweeting at the TV is not going to fix things.” Referring to some caricature of Trump he envisions, I assume.

This from a man who talked and talked and talked and never did anything of value for people or the whole country.He stomped on their hopes, dreams and history.

  • Lecturing people was not going to fix things, Barry.
  • Politicizing the DOJ and FBI was not fixing things.
  • Tearing the country down was not fixing things.
  • Mocking and talking down to people was not fixing things.
  • Apologizing for a bad America was not fixing things.
  • Mocking and blaming Christians was not fixing things.
  • Runnning a clandestine surveillance on political opponents was not fixing things.
  • Using the IRS to attack political opponents was fixing nothing.
  • Constructing a coup on an incoming president was not fixing things.
  • Gutting our military was not fixing things,
  • Selling out America was not fixing things. (it was breaking thngs)
  • Writing unconstitutional dictates was not fixing things.
  • Refusing to cooperate with investigations was not fixing anything.
  • Instituting a war on energy was not fixing things.
  • Leading from behind was not going to fix things.

For a minute, all the shattered hopes and dreams were again visible. When all that mattered, once again, was that we hear soundbites from an angry man yelling at us. And yelling at America. He never liked America, it was abundantly clear. He despises us.

So he fixed nothing…..except our resolve. Thanks for nothing, Barack Hussein Obama.

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2020

Haunting Biden

As soon as Joe Biden announced his bid in the primary for president, it presented a two-fold problem. On one side it seemed like a gift, while on the other it could be a referendum on Obama/Biden for eight years.

So though it seemed a great opportunity to personalize Joe, the prosecution of the case against Obama was fraught with setbacks. Well, that is partly because there is just so much to convict in those years, but the track record for doing that has not been good at all. Not to mention the lack of will to follow through among Republicans about doing it.

It would be a hard slog and there is only so much time in an election campaign to make the entire case — and since the case has not been pursued anywhere else. Especially in a year like this one with a pandemic interrupting the campaigning process. It would be a daunting task and take some skill to weave through all the grievances, corruption and abuses.

Yet it could be done. And all you would have had to say is Biden was there for eight years. That is his record. It is pretty self-evident. Case closed. Grand jury anyone?

However, you know the cozy coalition of media and desperate Democrats would resist an O=B referendum just as they are in resistance to this presidency now.

We know the issues from 2009 to 20017. Then they left with a big bang still echoing throughout Deep State to this day. It revealed all we knew about the duo of destruction. They were allies in evil, who never had accountability for any of it. It didn’t seem fair.

Even though Joe may be very much alive, he is still a very haunting presence.

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2020

RBG To Refried Beans

Ruth Bader Ginsburg died, just like she wrote in many stinging opinions, in dissent.

She sat on a seat during a president who was not of her political preference. She was in dissent with the executive branch and president. That was her opinion, okay.

But she had time and opportunity to leave under Obama’s regime, who could have replaced her with a suitable radical jurist. No she was in dissent on leaving then.

Now news comes out about a statement made to her granddaughter saying:”my fervent wish is to not be replaced until a new president is installed.” Once again, in dissent..

Dying wish trumps all?

Who is she to get that say? She had her say and voice when she did not retire despite her health. In dissent all the way. Now she appears to be crying out in dissent.

Yet in 2016, she wanted the nomination and confirmation process to go forward to replace Antonin Scalia, who was her ideological opponent as well as her good friend. Why can’t we use her own words then, as she is now, in dissent?

Didn’t she know of Scalia’s fervent desires about such things? Surely she knew he would not want to be replaced by Obama. She would have known that. But she said replace him under that president, even as he was termed-out and leaving office in months.

No, she was gung ho about ramming a nominee through to replace Scalia, despite the Senate being in Republican hands. Under the bus you go, good friend.(nothing personal)

That should have told us something there. Or is all that only refried beans now? She was in dissent then as she is in dissent now. Friends like that who needs enemies?

 

See also on the topic:

RBG told Senate in 2016 to do ‘their job,’ replace Scalia before election: report — NY Post

“There’s nothing in the Constitution that says the president stops being the president in his last year,” Ginsburg told the New York Times in 2016 when she urged the Senate to do “their job” and consider President Obama’s court nominee Merrick Garland.

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2020

Let It Rip or Rip It Up

I’m not sure how other people measure their disgust on the sliding scale but I know how I qualify my own. It has only been tested in recent events.

This week I had a short phone conversation with an acquaintance I’ve known for years. Everything was fine until at the end the person said I just hope we can do what we need to do not to re-elect this guy and he has to be voted out of office. That’s it, nothing about who else was running. Just throw Trump out of the White House.

I restrained from politics with this person, as I always have. It’s pointless. However, I could not resist suggesting, “careful what you wish for.” What do you mean” came a predictable response. I said “that alternative could be much worse.” So the conversation ended on that note with the person wondering what it meant. I thought it was fairly clear.

But isn’t that the point? They never consider alternatives or anything else for that matter. They know what they want. I could say what I want, too, but what good does that do?

That is the way it is with many people. No reasoned approach on what gets them to their conclusion. You can’t really have a dialogue with that. So I decided maybe I would put it in writing rather than waste my time. It is clear the person did not want to hear opposition.

It reminds me of the cancel culture. All they know is they want someone out, or marginalized from society. Somehow that goal fits their agenda and satisfies them. What a horrible way to view things, just cancel anything you don’t like or agree with.

Where does that power come from? It is part of mob mentality, meaning their voice and desire outweighs you or your views. And in the end, they cannot tolerate your view, belief or whatever – or you personally. It must go.

Now with the presidential race, they want to go backward and return to some euphoric Obama-Biden days. But the rest of us made it through and survived those years.

No, it was not easy.That was no picnic.

But we didn’t have a coup against the sitting president; no special counsel investigation of him; no one raking over of all his personal records; no public boycotts of anything to do with him; we didn’t prevent him from doing the job. And there was no impeachment designed and plotted from day one to oust him from office.

No riots and burning buildings with tens of thousands of decoys marching in the street. No attacks on Obama supporters. No band of people within government secretly working to undermine Obama’s administration. No courts lodging edicts to stop him. No press and media attacking him and Biden nonstop to delegitimize his election or presidency.

No sedition in the form of “resistance” to overthrow him.. No debate about the use of the 25th amendment to have him removed. No one telling people to “get in their faces” of Obama supporters, create a crowd and tell them they are not welcome in public.

No constant calls for impeachment from house members. No ripping up his State of the Union Speech in Congress. No games about preventing him from giving his SOTUS. No power plays to remove powers of the Constitutional presidency. No FBI executing phony FISA warrants and spying on him as a candidate and then as president. No surveillance of Obama’s team, and to frame him as a traitor to America.

No official of the DOJ refusing to follow and enforce executive orders or laws. No agenda to prevent President Obama from seeking or hiring people. No secretly telling other countries not to cooperate or work with the sitting president. No conspiring against him. No undermining of Obama as commander-in-chief within the military or Pentagon – or in the ranks. No working to undermine US military objectives by officials or former diplomats.

That would be only a starting point of the differences and what we endured for eight years as opposed to what the Left does now. They had their chance, wasn’t it enough?

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2020

Democracy Sham On The Rocks

One of the favorite words Democrats use in their rhetoric is democracy. The angrier they get, the more they throw out that word.

Even though we are not a direct democracy but a representative democracy, a Republic, they insist on using the word to legitimize everything they do and their entire agenda.

But the word democracy is not what people should think of when they think of Democrats. Dems know the word resonates well and has a good image. Their own image is awful.

Now they claim democracy is under attack. Trump is trying to steal democracy. Democracy is at risk. Joe Biden said in his nomination speech, ”democracy is on the ballot.” What the hell does that mean? It means what you want to think it means — that it is in question. But with progressive Democrats it is in question.

They fight for mail-in voting or virtually any other extraordinary means to an election, from keeping polls open extra late, to counting votes days after an election, to disqualifying lawful ballots and including unlawful ones. Then running to courts to contest election results. It really is that simple.

They like anything one can think up to game the system. Ballot harvesting, guess who likes that? Mailing out millions of ballots to all registered voters in advance, who likes that? Allowing illegal aliens to cast votes in national elections, who likes that? Disqualifying military votes, who likes that? Registering all people to vote automatically, who likes that? Then using the euphemism of Democratic Party to invoke symmetry with democracy.

Sadly, some people still buy their antics of semantics.

So they would have you believe if you do not vote Democrat, then you are not voting for but against democracy. It’s a linguistics game.

Obama and now Biden were notorious for using the word democracy. So, with cancel culture being so popular now, wouldn’t it be wonderful if they could say Trump wants to cancel democracy or fair elections? Why not? It sounds so good.

But, like the Washington Examiner said in an article, in response to Obama’s convention speech rhetoric:

“This from the same guy whose administration launched a spying operation at the highest levels of the federal government into Mr.Obama’s political enemies in order to cancel a free and fair election.”

That is exactly what they did and were up to in 2016. Thereby canceling all our votes in the process. That’s very undemocratic, you might say. And people actually defend it.

Their side show of democracy is like everything else they do. But when mob rule wins the day in places across the country, don’t mistake that for democracy. When American people overwhelmingly support law and order verses riots, don’t let them tell you violence and rioting protests have anything to do with democracy.

I almost can’t wait to see their interpretation of this election and why people voted the way they did. What an abortion of democracy that will be.

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2020

Déjà vu Election Season

Since some of the lead up to this election is starting to remind me of the 2000 election, I thought it would be nice to take a retro look back at it to see what I find.

We all remember that election probably as if it were yesterday because of how traumatic it was. Trauma can do that often etching something in your mind so as not to be lost.

We know how it ended but that was not the issue. It was contested every which way possible; it went on for months – which at times felt like years. At least then it was a standard election until all hell broke loose on election day.

Remember the recounts and the vote-mining operations?

In the end it was a confirmation from the Supreme Court that granted Bush the presidency. That’s when it got even worse. Never satisfied with the results, Dems persisted.

Democrats never quite accepted it and that went on for some time. At least until the 911 attacks wiped it off the top of the list. It was a volatile time even before that.

Democrats did not seem to mind the litigation process. As long as it was in limbo, they didn’t care. Remember the every vote counts and count every vote chants.

Now that is where the 2020 election is starting to feel a lot like that one. I mean 3 months away and they are already posturing for something, problems, contesting results. The story is Biden has over 300 layers already working on it.

No doubt they are war-gaming any scenario so they have an active plan on how to proceed. You can’t plan enough.

One probable prediction is that it may never be considered settled if Trump is declared winner in the end. Try to plan for that? All those plans will make us a miserable and unsettled country. That doesn’t seem to bother the Left at all. As long as they are trying to get the outcome they want.

There is a pattern here.

They tried a coup, a counterintelligence investigation, a special counsel probe and investigations in Congress over three years to its results, then to an impeachment. All that did not produce the outcome they wanted.

First, they went after Michael Flynn from day one to try to breach Trump’s campaign and his presidency after elected. They even tried parlaying some of it into the Southern District of NY courts and the DC Courts to probe Trump any way they could.

They took down his campaign manager, Paul Manafort, surveilled people from the campaign like Carter Page and George Papadopoulos even before he was elected. Lied to FISA. They went after Donald Trump Jr. and Trump’s personal attorney, Michael Cohen, since election. They went after Roger Stone. All this got them a few indictments but not on colluding with Russians in the Campaign. Still, they continued undeterred.

Along came a phone call to Ukraine, so they turned it into an investigation after the Special Counsel failed to give them what they wanted. Then they translated that phone call into an impeachment trial – which, in reality, they had been working on since Trump came in.

Aka the kitchen sink impeachment. This took them up to reelection year. It failed in the Senate, but they could always keep that investigation open for future use. Keep on digging.

But then came the pandemic from China as the impeachment failed. So they politicized and used that pandemic to attack Trump. Forget the source as China; it was now the Trump pandemic. They got all the mileage they could out of that up to their DNC convention.

Ah, in comes a new factor, mail-in voting, perfect for politicizing and weaponizing against Trump. (I only hope that any future presidential prospects on the right are taking note of it all.) This is how they operate.

The projection election.

So now they have basically decided to question this election by saying Trump is trying to steal it. Trump is rigging the election. Democracy is being stolen. Only the undermining democracy is coming from the Democrats. It’s something they are skilled in and have been working at for about 20 years now. They didn’t have to unearth their plans with Obama because he won, but it was there for the use.

Actually, democracy has been under siege and attack since Trump won the 2016 election. Only this time they didn’t stop contesting it. They basically rolled in all these other processes and battles to it. But the point in it all is to undermine the democratic process and legitimate election in 2016.

The fight went on from 2016 right up until months before the next election, which is where we are. So it is an ongoing battle. And this should likely take us right into January.

I think it was January 6th when the results were all certified in the 2000 election. This time, they can even try to blow past that if they have to. They want to push everything right up to inauguration day. Then the fun starts.

But of course all that extra-curricular activity could be avoided by Trump losing on election day, or conceding at some point. Other than that you might say this election is never going to end until the end of Trump’s second term. It will always be in play. That is untl they get the result they want.

Democrats like to write fiction, they are just not very good on the endings.

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2020

Conventional Wisdom Under Assault

Now here is one central question to ask for the 2020 election:

Trump’s Super V-shaped recovery … or Biden the Supernova destined to take it out?

That seems to be simpler and a little more direct than the old “are you better off” question.

John Kasich popped up again in Democrat’s convention, who also has a new book “It’s Up To Us.” So here is my memo to retro-John.

“It’s up to us” to call people out, John. You weren’t standing at a fork in the road … you already took it long ago. And you’re still burning those bridges, every last one of them!

How about this for a NEWS FLASH:

Just in, Joe Biden’s entire reason for running was because of a big lie.

He said he decided to run because of the phony Charlottesville narrative about Trump and supremacists. Well, it’s a lie. See how long Democrats can keep a narrative alive?

That brings us to suburban woman and the suburbs agenda. Dems and media contend it is a debunked conspiracy theory. No it isn’t. They just claim it is not true. Democrats have been working on that agenda for years. Obama had it all in place to take control of the suburbs and turn them into a Washington bureaucracy. Then Trump upended it.

But Dems are so worried about suburban women, they claim Trump is trying to scare voters, when they are the architects of an assault on suburbia. Now they chastise women to vote for Democrats, to oppose Trump. But doing so would be to vote against the very place they love and live in.

Sure, suburban women can vote against suburbs if they want to. Why they would want to is more the question? That would be voting to destroy the autonomy of suburbs, turning them over to DC planning, zoning and bureaucracy. That is the consequence.

In other convention news: Democrats featured an “immigrant” family in their convention to attack Trump’s immigration policy. Except for one thing, the mother in the family highlighted was originally deported under Clinton, and re-arrested under Obama.

See the full story here in Just The News.

Take a look at this article and video to see how they deliberately distorted all the facts to concoct a victim story. The child in the video says her mom was told “she could stay by the Obama administration.” But it was a temporary stay. They distorted every part of the facts, then cut Trump’s word’s and twisted them like a pretzel to imply he said something else. All a lie. What’s new?

In Michele Obama’s speech, she referenced the “cages for children” attack, while it was her husband that built them. If you think these Democrats are not capable of lying about anything they can for political gain, then I have some news for you.

It all stands conventional wisdom on its head. Repeal Dems, it may be our only chance.

Right Ring | Bullright

Sick Man Walking

Now Obama will be known for something other than predator droning and a coup. He is the nastiest of former presidents, with unbridled vitriol.

So this makes me regret a whole bunch of things. Remember all those times that some conservatives preferred to bite their tongues, or refused to use certain language about Obama? Well, I would sure like a do over. It would have been more than appropriate considering the things Obama is saying now about Trump.

Face it, all of Obama’s speeches were laced in divisive rhetoric. But we know it was intentional because that’s his M/O and the way he is. Some people refused to admit back then that he was intentionally dividing, not unifying, America. It was no accident. But dividing is what he is all about. So many people in the Obama years refused to see what was plainly visible right in front of their faces. And he was rubbing their noses in it while they denied it. Now we know.

It’s just that once he achieved a divided America, he was going to blame us for the very divisions he caused anyway. That was the game. He was going to project all his faults on us. Now we see that was his plan. How Obama and his militants attacked anyone with the audacity to criticize him. Don’t dare besmirch Obama. Nice rules to the game!

Then he unleashes his trash mouth of vitriol on Trump, even after he ran a coup and tried to undermine democratic elections. ‘Oops, did I do that?’

I only wish people would have told that bastard what they thought of him at the time, and what he really was. Remember all those times people like McCain said no don’t call him a Muslim or criticize him. All the time Obama took shots at everyone else, all he did, but they didn’t respond in kind. Then any critics were attacked for daring to criticize him.

Remember how it worked? Can’t talk smack about the black man, no! There was a whole lot of denial in eight years about who and what he was. But apparently he is not through lecturing us yet, calling us names, or hating on America for that matter. What a sicko.

How many more years do we have to tolerate this charade and his partner in crime, Soros, wrecking the country with their radical agenda?

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2020

Time To Make The DNC Donuts

Tonight Democrats’ are going for broke in DNC’s four-day long assault on the President of the US. The invective, vitriol and personal attacks are like nothing we’ve ever seen before.

If there were any phony hint of self-restraint remaining, Obama blew it out of the water on Wednesday night, with the most personal attack by a former president ever made on a sitting POTUS. It must have been a real feel-good moment for Obama in busting yet another presidential precedent, like all the others he obliterated.

One day your grandchildren may look back and ask, “you mean there was a time when former presidents did not go out and personally attack the sitting president?”

Now tradition is to attack the president using every conspiracy theory or personal assault possible. Have at it! That’s protocol, for the good of the country. Or just ‘throw a punch, for the children,’ as Speaker Pelosi puts it .

New norms have been set all across the country. It is now compulsory to take a knee at the National Anthem, too. Cancel words in the Pledge of Allegiance to suit yourself. Feel Free.

Fortunately for Obama, he had the luxury of serving under the old rules. More of that “change you can believe in” he promised. Spying on an incoming president and undermining an election would be perfectly acceptable now under his revisions.

So a counterintelligence investigation on a candidate, incoming president or even sitting president, why not? Knock yourselves out. If you don’t respect the country, why respect the office of the president?

I can’t wait to hear what Joe Biden comes up with for his presidential nominee debut.

But the problem with Biden is: some bad Chinese got him weak in the knees.

And that is just the way the DNC Donut rolls.

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2020

Night Three of Undead Dem Con-vention

Night three, cast of infamous characters is getting bigger and bigger.

  • Obama
  • Hillary
  • Kerry
  • Michelle Obama
  • Sally Yates
  • Bubba the Cigar Star – Bill Clinton

So It’s 8-20-2020, all the nefarious snakes came out to kick the nest.
Oooh weee!! They awful MAD about something! They worried?

I can’t imagine anything better for Donald Trump than this cast of unindicted conspirators.

Obama said our “democracy is at stake” No, Barry, our country is at stake!

Meanwhile, the media is on a Shit Show tour. Conspiracy news leads the way:

  • Trump is slowing mail delivery
  • destroying the post office
  • stealing the election
  • stealing our democracy.
  • Democracy is under attack
  • Trump is a threat to democracy.
  • Conspiracy theories?

Who is stealing our democracy? Where? MSM Madness.

Someone dial 911. Grand Theft!

They are defining democracy down.

Three down.

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2020

’68 Wants Its Candidate Back

There is a positive story to all this political speculation and posturing. Well, if you are not a diehard Democrat anyway.

But all you have to do is close your eyes for a minute and think it is 1968 again, with all the political turmoil, protests and unrest. It is also a strange election year.

Joe Biden is Hubert Humphrey, who was the beneficiary of being VP in an administration under which all the turmoil and problems blossomed. He tried to stand up a nice run for president while ignoring that he was present when the actions occurred. Does running against oneself sound familiar? It should.

He too wanted to ride a popular tide right into the Oval Office but it didn’t work out that way. He tried to remain oblivious to current realities.

Humphrey also had a long Senate career record plus experience as VP. But he didn’t campaign as he should have. He expected to just slip right in there, with all the pomp and circumstance his recognition provided. The office seemed to be there for the taking.

But listen to what Humphrey’s bio says:

“As vice president during 1968—arguably the United States’ most politically turbulent post-World War II year—Hubert Humphrey faced an excruciating test of statesmanship. During a time of war in Southeast Asia when the stakes for this nation were great, Humphrey confronted an agonizing choice: whether to remain loyal to his president or to the dictates of his conscience. His failure to reconcile these powerful claims cost him the presidency. Yet few men, placed in his position, could have walked so agonizing a tightrope over so polarized a nation.”

The Democrats projected an image of disorganization and chaos to the nation that year, as the party at one time or another split as many as four ways into factions supporting Humphrey, Johnson, Eugene McCarthy, and George Wallace.” [source]

At least Humphrey had been an effective Senator but his consternation as VP, and the later failures in his presidential campaign to nowhere, did him in.

Neither Humphrey or now Biden were being honest about present reality.

Biden is running on the fumes of propped up polls and media sycophants’ illusions. The people didn’t buy it for Humphrey and they shouldn’t buy it with Biden.

Joe’s already hidden and sealed his records in secrecy. Kamala Harris has had the luxury of the same. They simply believe they are the untouchables – in a world where everything is scrutinized, including Obama’s soured, unproductive tenure under a shadow of scandals.

But in Humphrey’s case, his earlier accomplishments did not match up to his dismal failures in the administration and his campaign. While this could easily turn into a piece on Humphrey, it is not. He only makes the example.

It is Joe Biden who, less gifted than Hubert, has the uphill task. And that is all that matters. If Humphrey had to struggle, how much more a struggle is it for Biden – who does not have Hubert’s gift of extreme gab but the gift of gaffe. He has so much to explain for.

Contrarily, Biden is the one with all this to answer for but who skips along on Obama’s drafting coattails. His vast foreign policy experience was wrong and misguided at every step. Then corruption under Obama is the worst in history. Yet there he stands as if he were the savior, rather than quack in the basement, as Dems run toward communism.

You all know Biden and his record by now, well what is not sealed in a vault at the university. It is not a stellar example of anything.

Now the lesson to take from this is this: if Humphrey with a real record on civil rights and reform, under the pressures of a Democrat revolt, loses; then Biden, with a dismal record on anything and backdrop of a Marxist meltdown, should spontaneously combust into thin air. (no matter who he is running with)

Welcome to AA: “Hi, I’m Hubert I mean Joe Biden, Jill Biden’s husband, and I’m a loser. Come on, man!”

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2020

Nightmare On Pennsylvania Ave

Obama and Biden were responsible for the most egregious abuse of power in US history. Just start there. What a way to be memorialized in history for future generations.

I think we have been looking at this sort of backwards. We think of all the henchmen, or who carried what out, as the bad guys for what they did. But they were only the facilitators. Sure, they were all in on it though the henchmen are the ones who did it. But the orders as well as hatched plans had come from the top.

Obama and Biden did what they did and conducted a spying operation against Trump because they didn’t like who got elected president. But that doesn’t go back far enough because it started while Trump was running for president.

So to unfold this you go to where what Hillary did meshed with what Obama did. That intersection would be the crucial point. But Obama was heavily involved in Hillary’s campaign, as if it were his own re-election campaign.

Hillary is the one who set the law firm in place between her and Fusion GPS to create the dossier, which got back fed into the FBI and intelligence. But it appears that the FBI already had a surveillance operation against the Trump campaign. Both sides appeared to have been working against Trump, but the dossier certainly combined the two if they were not already aligned. I don’t think there was any doubt that Obama/Biden and Hillary were working together all along.

When people try to keep an open mind is when they get into all kinds of trouble. They try to decouple what the parties were doing when it was in concert. By accident? Hardly, the facts keep bringing it back to a unified effort. And if they were not operating cohesively at first, they certainly wanted to be. FBI sealed that.

Team Hillary was desperately waving a flag saying: ‘look here, investigate this.’ And then they went to lengths to create official links within the FBI to Hillary’s campaign. Maybe there is a question on exactly what date they were formally working together, but they functioned as one from the beginning. Both parties working toward the same goals. You could say parallel tracks.

Ah, the Obama – Biden administration wanted to use and offload the problem with Russia meddling right into Trump’s lap. He was a patsy to scapegoat the Russian problem on.

Remember that Russian meddling had been a problem since 2014, long before Trump. Any sitting president would have been aware of it, as Obama was. What to do? He stalled on any action. Then Trump became a convenient purpose to use the Russian problem for. Hence, create the narrative.

But then Hillary was onboard with the same mission. Was that by coincidence? Didn’t they share those same concerns and ideas? One would expect they must have.

Oh but then there was the flowering FBI investigation over Hillary that would wilt away, in July, at FBI’s behest. Not that they were really seriously investigating her/it anyway. The purpose of that case was to go through the motions to clear her of wrong doing. So she could use it to show she was given a clean bill of health.

Past was intertwined with the future. There was Obama’s legacy and Hillary’s future presidency that would cover all of the dirty, dark areas of his tenure. While she would go on to use government for her own personal political gain, in keeping with the pattern.

Trump was an inconvenient interruption in more ways than he could even imagine. And the people could surely not be given the truth about any of what went on. That would be seen as failure from all sides of the cabal. Hillary’s legacy would be to cover his and hers. Both wanted nothing but glowing adoration for generations to come, even while turning the system inside out. (but it would all be for a good purpose – theirs)

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2020

Dems Want A Doormat, Not A President

Democrats don’t want to elect a president; they want to elect a doormat. There is a little bit of a misconception that Democrats want a strong executive for a president.

But no they don’t. They want a suit in the office and a doormat to the White House. They want someone who the mob can demand what they want to, and have him deliver on their every whim. He or she can then rule with an iron fist on behalf of the mob.

The other misconception is Democrats want someone empathetic. They don’t want someone to feel their pain; they want someone to heal their every pain. They don’t care whether the president feels for them as long as he/she performs on the mob’s command.

Besides, “feeling your pain” is a bit condescending, isn’t it? What is that worth?

Democrats don’t want democracy either. They want mob rule. That is as long as they control the mob and it operates in their favor.

Other than that, a president can issue a lofty, Obamaesque speech occasionally to make them feel good. But what he does for them is much more important. And they are a demanding bunch of intolerant brats, with a wish list longer than War And Peace.

Joe Biden delivered an address to Democrats adding a quip about his father saying:

“My dad used to say, “Joey, I don’t expect the government to solve my problems—but I sure expect them to understand it.””

Understand it? That’s about the last thing it seemed capable of under Obama-Biden.
Now let me loosely revise that into a simple theorem of my own.

I don’t expect government to solve my problems….. But I don’t want them to get in my way and keep me down there, or cause me more problems.

I do expect government is incapable of feeling my pains when I have them. But I just don’t want it to cause the pain. And I certainly don’t need it to extort my problems.

But when government does cause me problems and pain, I have a First Amendment right that says I can spell out that problem.

So Joey is trying to create a code to live and govern by. Well, he is a little late. We see the kind of code he and Obama operated by over the years. His family is enriched by his “public service.” Public office is a self-serving position, to him, not a selfless service.

Do you think his dad always told him that? Or did his father tell him that other people’s pains and losses are just a political opportunity for him and other elected pols to extort? That a crisis is an excellent opportunity to abuse political power.

Where did those values come from, Joey? And what oath of office mentions those?

Don’t you always love getting lectured about “values” from Democrats when they prove they really have none? They do their moral preening but then take advantage of every problem or crisis, even when creating it themselves, for pure political gain. Then rub your face in it. This skill is what they are really good at – turning your pain into their gain.

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2020

Obama’s Very Pregnant Problem

When Barack Obama stuck his head back in the political fray, he may know or not that he has a whopper of a problem. Note, I did say singular.

Last weekend Obama ended his silence by speaking out about the Flynn case running out of steam. Well, it really appeared to to bug him, didn’t it?

The Hill

“The news over the last 24 hours I think has been somewhat downplayed — about the Justice Department dropping charges against Michael Flynn,” Obama said in an audio clip that was obtained and released by Yahoo News.

“And the fact that there is no precedent that anybody can find for someone who has been charged with perjury just getting off scot-free. That’s the kind of stuff where you begin to get worried that basic — not just institutional norms — but our basic understanding of rule of law is at risk,” the former president said. “And when you start moving in those directions, it can accelerate pretty quickly as we’ve seen in other places.”

Barry Soetoro, Barack Hussein, or whatever name he is using, is probably starting to feel squeezed like a dishrag. If he isn’t there yet, he soon will be. He is likely starting to consol with some advisor (David Axelrod or Eric Holder) about the political ramifications of his newfound situation.

The more you think about it, the more you will see he has a predicament on his hands. Sure this case was about Flynn, so he and media wants us to think, but it is much more about Barack Obama and his administration. A s the coup was Obama’s administration.

I am not being dramatic, I am disappointed that conservative press has not connected the dots for Obama’s situation, problem yet. The quandary for Barry is how he plays his cards, he dealt himself, which determine everything else forward. What do I mean?

Either he plays it that he was the absentee professor, in which case he claims he had a rogue agency meddling in the election and presidency after it; or he simply says he was fully aware of the treasonous seditious coup afoot under his scandolous administration. See the problem with both options.

He is in a very bad place. But hey, he’s had almost four years now to think about and plan this out along with his excuses for it.

There is one other possibility that he could try to defend it all as justified. But that is getting harder, seeing how flawed and illegitimate it all was. We don’t even have to get into why, as in the real motive. He has to choose how to respond to what we’ve found and what is yet coming down.

Personally, I would like to see him have to spend 7+ million or so trying to explain his actions and those of his administration, just for starters.

No wonder Barry is lashing out under mounting pressure. Not that he ever cared about defending himself, he never had to. He has two paths in front of him, each will determine his future path and strategy. Does he try to defend indefensible behavior?

Does he once again say he was not in the loop in it all? But we know he was there and in on it this time. So does he pass it off as rogue actions of an out of control intelligence apparatus acting on their own? Or does he admit he was in the loop but they were all justified in their scheme? Will he take the hit and responsibility for all that went on? Or will he try to blame all his subordinates for screwing him and his legacy (no-scandal record) up?

His underlying problem is that kind of operation can only be done under the president’s authority and knowledge. By definition it requires his approval. Comey blessed him.

Oh, he is in a heap of trouble. You know the saying that you can give someone enough rope. And he has been given lots of rope and opportunities to explain this over the years. But just like Benghazi, he never does try to explain it. Now he must choose how to respond. Both are inherently bad choices for him. No surrogates or advisors can bail him out either.

I sort of expect that Barr understands all that very well. And Durham is bound to come up with something damning about Obama’s administration. So even if that does not involve him personally, he will now have to have an explanation for it. That is something Barry Soetoro has never been forced to do before. He doesn’t like coerced decisions or explanations he cannot pass off to someone else. No one can do it for him this time.

Right Ring | Bullright

Obama VS. Trump 2020

The election in 2020 could end up being one between Obama and Trump, where none of the regular factors of political campaigns apply. You only have to revisit the 2012 election for a preview.

This thesis may seem anecdotally boring to those on the right, while it seems ridiculous to those on the left. It really depends on which side you are. Though both will probably be surprised in the end, if I am correct.

The 2012 election beween Romney and Obama was a bit of a misnomer. Obama was not in a comfortably favored spot by his record and what he had done so far without vetting. There were underlying issues to use against him.

The problem was that Romney did not prosecute the case against Obama. And in the final weeks of the election he all but abandoned the campaign, for whatever reasons. It doesn’t really matter for this case why.

Backing up to his initial race. Obama really ran as an outsider though that was entirely questionable. But in 2012, his campaign guru David Plouffe came up with the strategy – the only one he said could work – to run Obama as a non-incumbent candidate. So the strategy was to run an insurgent caampaign.

That is odd for a supposed likeable, successful president. Only he had a lot to run from. See Obama had a whole list of baggage that plagued him as the perenial insider, while they needed to make him an outsider. An impossible task, you might think. That strategy is like running against one’s self and one’s own record.

Then, helped by Romney’s many failures as a candidate, it was not a problem.

Donald Trump does not have the same problem Obanma had. He has an adequate record of change, he is the ultimate outsider, and yet he has the incumbent advantage he is is not afraid of. He also has the economic powerhouse verses the anti-capitalist radicals.

Actually, Trump has been personally running against Obama all along. First when he ran; and then ever since in every investigation and every witch-hunt contrived against him. Then shedding the policies of Obama to deconstruct the administrative state. It seems to be a very personal rivalry from Obama’s perspective that he never let go of. Trump is tasked with combating the administrative Deep State Obama built. He made strides

Trump also governs as an outsider. The proof is all over the media. And people appreciate his perseverance on issues that they have been fighting against for years.

He’s changed things from the same old failed politics of usual into including the voice of the people. Something Obama could never do. Political correctness has taken a back seat to right and wrong. It all reinforces the image of an outsider in Washington shaking up the status quo. As if that were even possible before.

Now Joe Biden is running with a peculiar predicament. He wants to run as an insurgent while being the consummate insider. That would be impossible. He needs to be the insurgent riding to the rescue with a credible reputation. He needs to have the high road even after years of taking the low road. He is the the ultimate creature of the swamp.

It could only be a schizophrenic campaign. One day Joe is railing as an outsider; the next he is lecturing with all his inside experience of a 44 year card-carrying veteran of Washington politics, as a made man. He’ll say he was right there with Obama making the decisions. Then he’ll come back and say we need accountable government — except Obama and Biden were not responsible or held accountable for anything. He’ll claim we need reforms; but no, Trump has been the ultimate reformer changing the way the system works. Biden will say we need to go forward, while trying to drag us back to the cesspool of Obama years. (before that was GW Bush)

Now, coming into view, we have the ideal election between status quo big-government politics and Trump’s small government, people-power approach. And no one represents big-government orthodoxy more than the Obama presidency. Biden is also a high priest of big-government. Now that the Dems have jettisoned working people, all that is left is the institutional ruling class that they represent with every move they make. Biden is the poster boy, even though many leftists don’t think he is radical or progressive enough.

Pay to play, corruption, secrecy in DC, career politics and elite ruling class are badges of honor in Biden’s campaign. He is the swamp personified that won’t let go..

However, what we are really running against is Obama. He is behind the scenes of it all in the shadowy swamp of DC and the DNC. Joe is only a front man for all Obama represented. Obama’s record is Joe’s. Even Hillary was never the placeholder that Biden is.

So it is a defacto referendum on Obama, like the real campaign challenge he never had in 2012. Let’s be honest, the real power beind Biden’s campaign is Obama and the Obamafiles sitting in the wings. Sure there are some Hillary people, but the force is with the Obama folks who have all signed on to the Bernie progressive formula for a poorer, anti-carbon, pro-corruption Amerika. Where identity is everything, individuals are nothing.

But that is Obama to a tee. And all Obama’s baggage is just layered on top of the wagon train. We don’t have to guess what Joe Obama would do. We have the proof.

After all, who was Obama running against in 2008? No, it was not McCain. It was George W Bush. But McCain was not even a placeholder for Bush. Obama literally ran against a former 2-term president the entire time.

Trump has the advantage that this is Obama’s record. To Obama, it seems everything he hoped for without being held accountable for the scandals and corruption. But he is wrong. Biden is all the negative and none of the positive. And I’m pretty sure there never was any positive to Obama. This is Obama 3.0. First was the outsider candidate, then was the insurgent incumbent, then came the invisible candidate hiding behind the campaign.

And all we and Trump have to do is prosecute the case because everything is on the table. It’s all fair game. There cannot be any “this has nothing to do with Obama.” It all has everything to do with Obama. It is Obama. We’re really running against Obama the candidate and his administration, with his entire record.

In fact, the biggest mistake would be not running against Obama and his record. It’s the opportunity of a lifetime. Exactly what Dems don’t want. And it is very personal.

Right Ring | Bullright

The Mushroom People

One of the most refreshing things so far about the Trump Presidency is the lack of comparisons to the Bush administration. If the Bushies thought they set the standard or high water mark in that administration, they were wrong.

Instead, the Obama administration did set the high mark for politicizing and weaponizing every faucet of government against its enemies; spying on citizens and its political opponents. That has no equal.

So comparisons of both of those to Trump are without merit. Trump charted a new course.

Obama used government as a weapon against all his enemies. He had his records sealed. What was that all about? What is he hiding? They went to endless lengths to attack their political opponents and still do. Then there was an elaborate cover up of it all.

Fortunately, we never saw a Hillary administration in action, which would have taken weaponization to new levels. But she did bequeath a dossier from foreign agents and back fed it into our government/intelligence, spawning a witch hunt and Deep State coup.

And Obama still thinks he has scores to settle. However, it was us who were violated, victimized and villainized. It continues three years later. What did we do wrong?

Still Trump gets the btunt of all the attacks from both Obama people and old never-Trumpers seeking to stop him. He’s attacked like no president in modern history. All because he refused to play the game the way they play it. And he has the people standing on his side like no other because of it.

As predicted, they impeached him the first chance they got just as they promised to do from the beginning. Talk about grudges and vendettas. They even ran a full-blown soft coup from Deep State before that. They undermine every policy he’s had. They mock him while showing no respect for the office or the people who elected him. They call us names and attack us.

Who do these people think they are? They tell us they are the “Resistance.” They’ve taken it to new levels of sedition. They themselves undermine any democracy in the country. In their book, losers are winners and winners become losers. They’ve said they’ll do whatever it takes to oppose Trump. If it means breaking the law, so be it.

If it means defying and opposing what the country stands for, they’ll do it. If it means using every part of government they can lay siege on or hijack to get their way, they are willing to use it against the president. These are the dregs and cream of the seditious crop. They are traitors to the country, claiming to stand on some principle of opposition.

And now, now, they want to push socialism on us like some new morality. They believe the answer to every one of our problems is socialism. But even that is not quite enough. They are really Marxists. And their so-called resistance is against anyone in their way.

Yes, it is a Revolution like Bernie says. Democrats have become the party of sedition and insurrection until they get their way. They thrive off the darkest corners of our society.

Right Ring | Bullright || ©2020

Coming To Terms

I am trying to come to terms with some terms.

Actionable intelligence — what does that mean to Dems? We may never know.

Imagine not killing a terrorist because you may get attacked with terrorism.

That’s all, just trying to come to grips with those concepts.

I’m serious.

BTW: and would someone ask NYC Mayor Bill de Blasio what that pizza would cost if Democrat Socialists came to power? I bet 30 bucks would look like a steal.

Right Ring | Bullright

Intelligence Flip Flops

Trump was blamed for 3 years for not listening to intelligence. Now he responds to a real threat based on actionable intelligence and the Left goes berserk. In fact CNN’s byline now is question our intelligence first. Qassem Soleimani was killed in a Reaper Drone strike.

Indeed, all Democrats say they want to see the evidence and intelligence the president used in making the decision. They also dismissed killing Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi.

It turns out that there are suddenly a lot of arguments that can be made for not following our intelligence. Shall we say for NOT acting in real time to take out a major terrorist actor in the midst of rolling out attacks against the US.

Who thought that was possible?

It turns out there is so much to question about intelligence, much less what to do with it. I only wish everyone had the same interest in protecting US interests and in our national security. Wouldn’t that be nice? But they don’t; and let’s not deceive ourselves.

Our basic argument against Obama on Benghazi is that he didn’t do anything. In fact he did the opposite. He stood down any response to the attack. He should have had to explain it but he never did. Actually the whole thing was a cover up and lies by Susan Rice.

Incidentally, in the aftermath of the Qassem Soleimani strike, who was the top analyst CNN brought on to talk about it? Susan Rice. In a rational world of media coverage that would be irrational. And it would have no credibility.

Whom did CNN bring on next to talk about retaliation threats from Iran against the US? That would be FBI’s discredited former General Counsel, James Baker and Dep Director Andrew McCabe. Later, James Clapper rounded out their coverage of the experts.

Democrats are blinded by politics and their hatred for Trump. Those same people who never answered for the failures in Benghazi. Never mind that attacking our embassy is an act of war. They can ignore that.

How long till the left throws intelligence under the bus? But what a shame that Benghazi didn’t even merit a whisper campaign. That denial went on for years — same people.

Right Ring | Bullright

Perennial Bias At Work

Our government used the pretext of Russia to spy on a presidential campaign. And it parlayed that “investigation” into the presidency after Trump entered office.

  • The IG Horowitz report declares it found no documented or admitted political bias in the cause of the investigation.
  • It found 16- 17 problems with how the investigation was handled.
  • Horowitz testified to the Senate Judiciary Committee that no one who touched this entire investigation should feel vindicated.
  • It found fraud committed in the FISA process.
  • The investigation used a dirty Russian-based dossier, paid for bu a political campaign, employing a foreign agent, as evidence in a FISA court for wiretapping + surveillance.

The question of political bias is almost moot now. Does it matter or is it relevant? An investigation has inherent bias, since the purpose is that someone probably did something wrong. But they qualify political bias as a possible concern.. I am concerned about both.

What matters is what they did, errors and all. The central reason political bias seems to matter is based on whether it should have started or not. And was it a basis for the investigation? Was it the purpose of it?

So did we really expect them to call the investigation unjustified? That would have been an automatic indictment on everything they did. It would be a glaring admission. It is doubtful even an Inspector General would be willing to do that.

Putting that bias question aside, the whole rest of the process which followed is an indictment on the cause of that investigation. Why break laws, use sinister conduct or act with malfeasance in investigating a justifiable cause?

And all that conduct happened to be against Trump.

So maybe too much emphasis is placed on whether there was provable political bias in the contamination of the decision to investigate? At least it was all around it. Shouldn’t there be a necessary attempt to eliminate bias? But that is not what we saw.

Back to what we citizen voters think. Much was made about our interpretation of inherent bias in the investigation. Though we had probable cause to suspect and confirm bias in the process. In fact, it almost screamed bias. That no one would have heard those screams would be irresponsible. How could we not see it?

All we heard since it began, and continued in its various forms, is that the FBI and its investigation is above reproach. But that is not what we saw. We saw a natural cause for bias alarm. Yet that we even questioned the FBI or basis of it was the problem.

The whole Russia meddling problem in the election had little to do with Trump. They did not seem as interested in investigating Russian meddling as they were in investigating Trump collaboration. Russia was the predicate to investigate Trump.

Now if we had fraud in the investigating itself, we certainly had it in spades in the media reporting all along. It amplified whatever government was doing, both publicly and behind closed doors. You could label the reason for it as political bias. But does it matter? The media were doing what they were doing. Do we have to prove what effect their political bias had in order to validate whether it existed? That would seem absurd.

Yet the entire cabal boils down to that one simple fact: our Government used Russia as a pretext to investigate Trump, in an election and after. Period. Nothing changes that.

But Cardinal Comey calls our fears, analysis, criticisms and conclusions “all made up.

Right Ring | Bullright