Well-Heeled Scumbags And Cannibal Activists

It clearly looks as though the well-heeled masses and elites are coalescing around the toxic movement of Black Lives Matter, and its ever-evolving agenda of stupidity.

The lesson here is that one can feed the mob, if one chooses, but one should realize he or she may inevitably be on the menu.

Sometimes it is not the poison that kills the rat but the fatal drink after that does it.

Apparently they are unaware of the eventual blowback to follow a radical movement of this kind, from the people. We cannot sustain America on a diet of this garbage for any time.

But completely naïve of this or any other consequences to getting in bed with a brood of vipers like the BLM, these captains of destiny put everything on the line to lend their name and support to a political movement that has no conscience. It takes no prisoners; only destroys its enemies.

At the risk of trying not to be one of its enemies, these well-heeled corporations and individual players seek to be on the woke side of events, and in whatever lies ahead for the movement. So they fund or lend their credibility, and some of their fortunes, to something that could well destroy them in the end. But who cares?

It reminds me of how the boycotts shook out way back. It seemed popular to cater to boycotters’ whims on one issue, for the time. However, they didn’t seem to get that when they were busy caving to demands, it was their own value and company reputation they were happily putting on the line. Whose skin in what game?

The point was who does that? What sane mindset risks what they personally built and earned by handing it off to young thugs who don’t give a damn about their hard work or its value? Seems stupid to cede control over it to the mob.

But never mind what it does to the real value of your company. Ah, but you momentarily thought you were improving the value of that company. That’s a laugh.

Don’t they realize they are just being used as pawns for the mob’s political agenda? (whatever that is) Thereby reducing the value of a company to the will of thugs and activists. Sound like a good idea?

Of course the correct and only alternative is not to cave in to the thugs in the first place. Consequences to that, you ask? Maybe so but which is better? At least then you retain your own control over it rather than giving it away on extortion schemes.

It’s not like these street thugs are paying anything for the use of your name or company – but only taking or borrowing on it. How does that enhance your interests?

So here they are, once again, doing the same thing. Now there are more of them creating a mob of their own. More well-heeled elites chipping into the coffers, or getting on their knees to apologize to the mob.

That is not any kind of existence I want to have. While they may think there is something noble about it or in it for them, it really is an empty vacuum that will suck the value out of you for having caved to the mob’s whims. It’s a one-way street. You won’t even get their respect from the mob for your generosity. They cannibalize you in a heartbeat and walk away, on to the next cause du jour on their agenda.

So my advice to these well-heeled marks and would-be dupes of destiny is do not allow the mob to weaponize you or your business for its political gain. You might think you are doing something good by getting behind a popular cause but are you? Don’t think that immunizes you from the wrath of the mob in the future. It won’t.

It’s a bit like a protection racket. The minute you don’t pay, suddenly you don’t have any windows or your cash register is busted. You don’t win with the mob, only they do. You will become yesterday’s bread no one wants. They will loot and burn down your business as easily as the corner store, figuratively and literally, for not complying with their demands.

So if you really value your reputation, credibility or business, then why turn it over to the mob? Why allow it to be weaponized or even used against you? Their cause may seem just but so is yours. And no insurance will cover that loss.

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2020

Speculation Soars Deep

I am going into speculation mode hopefully to make a point. After all we’ve been through we are entitled and it is warranted. Here are a few examples.

Let me start with the biggest recent event, the killing of George Floyd and the massive protest riots we are seeing daily. They are organized in several cities. Possibly a little too well organized to swallow, I think. More is likely lurking beneath the surface.

Maybe the left had a plan in the works, on the shelf, for creating such a multi-city rioting scenario before the election? But they prematurely activated it by plugging George Floyd’s death into it. They could have been working on details a while. It does start to add up.

The spark of blacks was used to drive Biden over the nomination. The left sees the black vote as a central key to getting a Democrat elected but enthusiasm and numbers have been waning. They wondered what Democrats had done for them? Democrats needed something to rally them. Leftist activist groups have had experience at that. Planned?

And it is not a stretch to wonder if “peaceful” protestors are only cover for the other violence, riots and looting we see? It adds the element of force and urgency — even revolution. That seems rational. That would make many things fit better. Everyone sees the media coverage of peaceful protesting and cops are busy covering them.

Meanwhile, back in the shadows crews plot violent assaults and riots. People are flowed into the city under the guise of protesting. You could go further to suggest Antifa are the real organizers as BLM runs interference to create a diversion of legitimacy.

Another is NYC has gotten slammed by violent riots. The mayor is anti-cop or anti-law enforcement. People say De Blasio’s incompetency is ruining the city. Now what if that is really his whole purpose to destroy the city? Suddenly it doesn’t seem so far-fetched.

While these all may appear to be active speculations at first, they add a layer of common sense to otherwise chaotic events, if it were true.

But then the lamestream media actually does the same thing to viewers every day. Only they don’t call it speculation. Every day they add to their conspiracy theories. Press chips in. They even rolled it into an impeachment to work people into a ferver.

One could also think of it this way. The DNC with the aid of deep state fabricated a conspiracy, investigation and setups to take down a candidate and then a sitting president. It went on for years. We see validation. How far less complicated are these possibilities?

If what Democrats did in that were not bad enough, try this latest on for size. In the first hearing on it by Lindsey Graham with Rosenstein, one Democrat claimed the hearings were unnecessary and that Trump was only using this to try to get re-elected.

Imagine that? So they carried out this coup in the shadows for years but now accuse Trump of using it all for his reelection campaign. Scandal? Beat that!

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2020

Freedom of Protest

In a country of 325 million people there are apparently so many people out there who don’t understand a basic fact. So here it is in a nutshell.

The first amendment does not grant anyone a right to destroy property.

One is a right and the other is a crime. Some conflate the two as one right. Freedom of speech and assembly does not equate to destroying property.

Many people rush to compare political sides to defend these protestors.

One big difference here between the right and left, though largely symbolic, is that a protest on the right is not followed by riots and looting. Usually they don’t leave mountains of garbage behind when it is over either.

On the left, those extra curricular rights seem to be generously included anymore.

Like most rights, they have an implied responsibility to the user. The protestors should be capable of having some self-control within their ranks. How come the right is expected to do that but the left is not?

Oh, instead they make up things about people being righteously angry and that violence is almost justified because of what they have experienced. And we’re supposed to accept that as just the way it is, unfortunately. The left turns protests into mere opportunities to lash out at the community or public where they hold them.

But then, like putting the icing on a cake, the media gives us a steady diet about “peaceful protests” – or mostly peaceful. But don’t keep count of the losers, those are the breaks..

Wouldn’t you think because people on the left have so many protests, at the drop of a hat, that they would be skilled at the process by now? Maybe they would know what is and what is not included under the rubric of protest. But no, things like burning police cars, looting and burning down buildings are just perks of a meaningful protest to them.

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2020

Urban Renewal Program for the Left

The Left’s urban renewal project is in full swing spreading out in multiple cities across the country. It only uses the name George Floyd, but urban renewal or destruction is its game.

Protestors only protest until the Marxists and anarchists takeover. Then the fun begins.

So in weeks we went from takeout at struggling businesses to curbside looting. But isn’t that what these “protests” usually lead to? Then. as they say, it’s all downhill from there.

Van Jones said he was impressed by the incredible “restraint shown”…get ready for it… on the part of the black people. He suggested it is a smaller number of blacks doing all this, because if it were most blacks then there would be much greater activity than we see.

We’re supposed to be grateful that it is not all blacks taking part in street riots.

For the most part it is in Democrat areas where these riots are taking place. And no, they are not protests. Looting is not a first amendment right.

But the Democrat officials have a problem. They are typically the pro-crime or pro-lawlessness crowd. But when the violence breaks out, they instinctively want to feel for the so-called protestors, bending over backward to do it. Terrorists know this too.

The same thing happened a week ago when Judge Sullivan decided he wanted to join the prosecutors instead of dropping the Flynn case the government asked. So he drops his robe and runs to the prosecution table to see what he can do to prevent dropping the charges.

It’s a compulsive disorder with Democrats. They can’t control themselves.

That’s the way Democrats respond under pressure, they side with the protestors till the violence and flames start, then stand down police from doing anything about it. Just let the anarchists and Marxists go do their thing. We’ve seen it over and over. Radicals and anarchists stand up and police stand down. Just the wrong message.

Democrats cannot be entrusted with power to protect the public without abusing authority.

Even to the point of sacrificing their community and police precinct to rioters. The Minneapolis mayor said the precint building “is only bricks and mortar.” Human life is much more valuable. Oh, so he made a judgement call that property is only property, never mind that it happens to belong to someone.

As days went by, more rioting, looting and burning. Over 170 buildings in Minneapolis have been damaged. By Friday night, they were working on a second precinct and the post office was burned, well on their way to destroying the city.

The idea, at least to media talking heads, is that these people deserve to be angry. So now that we’ve all established that their anger is justified, what’s left but leting it all burn? Who cares if the businesses and victims, whose properties were destroyed, had nothing to do with any of this George Floyd stuff? But then, it is not really about Floyd anyway.

But he’s only an excuse.

So looters show up like zombies who can’t help themselves from helping themselves to flat screen TV’s or loot. Someone needs to take them. Yet no charges or arrests are ever made as the mob pillages off the spoils from their own violence.

Back to the original victim, he is lost in it all, as the goods and flat screens take priority. So they have reduced someone’s life to just another looting opportunity. Isn’t that disgracing the person? You would think so.

The grand finale to 4 days of urban warfare was a long-winded press conference from the Gov of Minnesota, Tim Walz. Even he had to try to frame the “George Floyd protests” in terms of warfare and guerilla type tactics of urban terrorists. We know their names like Black Lives matter and Antifa but names don’t matter — it’s what they do.

So now at least some Democrats are finally willing to admit, for now anyway, what these people are and what they do. But that will probably change closer to election.

Welcome to Democrats’ urban renewal project. Enjoy your stay.

Right Ring | Bullright

Nazi ordered returned to Germany

Former Nazi concentration camp guard living in Tennessee sent back to Germany for decades-old human rights violations

By Vandana Rambaran | Fox News

A Tennessee man who was a former Nazi concentration camp guard during World War II will be sent back to Germany for decades-old human rights violations, a Memphis immigration judge ruled Thursday.

Friedrich Karl Berger worked at the Neuengamme sub-camp near Meppen, Germany, where Nazis imprisoned Jews, Poles, Russians, Danes, Latvians, Italians, and the Dutch and French as well as other political opponents, according to a ruling by U.S. Immigration Judge Rebecca Holt.

Meppen prisoners were held during the winter of 1945 in “atrocious” conditions and were exploited for outdoor forced labor, working “to the point of exhaustion and death.”

Berger admitted to the court during his two-day trial that, as part of his role, he guarded prisoners to prevent them from escaping during their dawn-to-dusk workday and escorted them to and from their worksites.

The Nazis abandoned Meppen in March 1945 after British and Canadian forces advanced on the region. The judge found that Berger helped guard the prisoners during their forcible evacuation to the Neuengamme main camp – a nearly two-week trip under inhumane conditions where nearly 70 prisoners died.

“Berger was part of the SS machinery of oppression that kept concentration camp prisoners in atrocious conditions of confinement,” Assistant Attorney General of the Department of Justice’s criminal division Brian Benczkowski said in a statement. “This ruling shows the Department’s continued commitment to obtaining a measure of justice, however late, for the victims of wartime Nazi persecution.”

https://www.foxnews.com/us/tennessee-man-who-served-as-concentration-camp-guard-during-wwii-ordered-removed-to-germany

Baltimore Sunblock: no thanks

After a cleanup effort spawned by many volunteers taking tons of trash from Baltimore, the Sun editorial board says thanks but no thanks, we got this race thing. (in their way)

What do you get for gestures of goodwill and your efforts? You get the finger from elitists trying to prop up status quo politicians of Baltimore’s inner city.

And pols like Cummings would rather use any publicity for fundraising opportunities to get re-elected. They would rather channel any dialogue to play politics as usual. The lamestream media, Baltimore Sun will chip in to give them kudos for their legacy failures.

“We assume it was pure motives that led a Trump supporter to launch a cleanup in Cummings’ district, right?”

Baltimore Sun

It made for good photos, compelling videos and catchy Twitter hashtags. A group of conservatives rolled their pickup trucks into one of West Baltimore’s most impoverished neighborhoods Monday for a cleanup day. Loaded down with trash bags and shovels, they cleared alleyways of old tires, food containers, paper and other debris. They pulled up weeds and cut away overgrown grass. The group posted before and after pictures on social media showing their progress.

The effort was organized by pro-Trump activist Scott Presler. He claimed the event was not political. Yes, he was inspired to come by tweets from President Donald Trump describing the area, represented by U.S. Rep. Elijah Cummings, as a “rodent infested mess.” But the visit wasn’t about showing support or animosity for either man, he said…./

More at https://www.baltimoresun.com/opinion/editorial/bs-ed-0808-conservatives-clean-west-baltimore-20190806-hmc2gndnhfhodch4yxromipgnq-story.html

And then, to finish it off, they throw in the usual condescending leftist lecture in the face of your goodwill.

We also hope Mr. Presler keeps his promise to return to Baltimore once a month. It would definitely give his motives more credibility. It might also give him better perspective about the city’s problems than any single visit can provide. Maybe it could even lead him and his followers to advocate for federal housing, health care, transportation, education, criminal justice, civil rights and anti-poverty policies aimed at urban communities.

This is akin to someone washing your car for you, and you run over to say, “you missed a spot!” Then tell them “and you better show up every weekend now.”

But they failed, too, to point out the difference of what the left does vs. what the right does. We see it all the time. Instead of a cleanup effort, Leftists hold rallies to shout epithets at the president or his supporters, or against law enforcement.

They leave trails of trash from their “marches” — you know those posed protests, but are really choreographed fundraisers for Democrats and media consumption.

That’s what we get from the left, all politics all the time. Power and control is all they care about. Your neighborhoods’ woes are only their means to further their political ends.

And if a person is only showing his animosity for Cummings by cleaning up an area in his district, then what am I missing? That’s some heavy animosity.

Baltimore, Elijah Cummings vs Trump

Let me get this straight, the city leaders of Baltimore have come together to rally (support) against President Trump’s criticism. So the leaders cannot find a way to fix Baltimore’s problems and conditions but instead focus on the real enemy, Trump?

But why is Trump the enemy and problem here? And the problems have nothing to do with race, unless you are saying only white people or Trump supporters care about the problems in Baltimore. But that is a horrible thing to say. And that would be insulting and offensive to say blacks or others don’t see or care about the problems with Baltimore.

So let’s unite to defend Baltimore from the president’s tweets. Those big bad Tweets. I don’t know exactly what “we’re going to continue to push forward” means. Maybe they should worry more about Baltimore than Trump.

But the Baltimore Sun is almost as bad. It declared itself the defense for Elijah Cummings. In one editorial deluge, clearly to defend Cummings, they ended the deflection and defense by choosing the rats: “Better to have some vermin living your neighborhood than to be one.” So beside actually calling Trump a rat/rodent, they make a deliberate decision to choose rodents in Baltimore.

Also in the dripping editorial venom, they spun the blame for problems in their city on Trump. Yet Elijah lives in and represents the hood. I guess that makes him immune to responsibility — in the standard Baltimoronic way.

Here is a partial quote:

“Finally, while we would not sink to name-calling in the Trumpian manner — or ruefully point out that he failed to spell the congressman’s name correctly (it’s Cummings, not Cumming) — we would tell the most dishonest man to ever occupy the Oval Office, the mocker of war heroes, the gleeful grabber of women’s private parts, the serial bankrupter of businesses, the useful idiot of Vladimir Putin and the guy who insisted there are “good people” among murderous neo-Nazis that he’s still not fooling most Americans into believing he’s even slightly competent in his current post. Or that he possesses a scintilla of integrity. Better to have some vermin living in your neighborhood than to be one.”

They will not sink to name-calling but then call Trump a rodent. Now they can rally against Trump as the enemy. Meanwhile, President Trump has channeled “$16 billion in 2018 alone to Elijah Cummings’ district in federal grants.” But then call him a rat. That works!

Sorry, they don’t get to blame Trump for the problems in Baltimore too. Though Cummings and his fellow Dems do nothing to fix the crisis on the border. But organize a rally against Trump, they can do that.

Right Ring | Bullright

Democrats’ yellow brick road to tyranny

My suggestion to Democrats would be come back to reality. But I don’t expect that happening anytime soon. They’ve taken decades getting here.

I do wonder though why every day they are just out to prove that is not possible? It is not bad alone to have the Democrat party, but as a collective it is evil in what they do.

Sadly, you cannot attribute the same characteristics of a person to a party. That would be a mistake. But that is exactly what many on the Left try to do to Republicans. You know how they constantly refer to the party, how Republicans should do this or stop doing that, as if they were appealing to a single person. It is one way they shame Republicans for being out of step with the party.

Well, on the left, party is all they have as a collective. It’s where the power resides. Because individual persons are powerless and/or insignificant. Individuals only have relevant meaning and power within the Democrat party. They really don’t make any bones about that. It is their driving purpose to give power to the voiceless and powerless. And they believe in keeping those people voiceless and powerless without the party.

So, that said, how is it they have those like AOC and Omar doing what they do and no one challenges them? We seem to be struck by the phenomena but it fits entirely with the party. They have taken over the reins of the party apparatus. You can argue about that but it is true. They proved the significant flaw with the party. Someone can rise through leftist tripe and ascend to the head of the party — even without election. It has been proven, first with Bernie and now with the Squad. In fact that was the objective of the Social Democrats’ “Justice Democrats”. Takeover is their objective.

You don’t see the same thing with the Republican party. Oh the Democrats project that theory on Republicans. It is not a reality though, someone doesn’t just hijack the party. They say “but Trump…” No, it’s not the same. If I have to explain it there is a problem.

But it is a simple process on the left. All one has to do is present ideas and incentives to entice people to support him/her. Offer them college tuition, reparations, money or benefits, rights, or power over others for their support. Bernie did not invent the formula though he was only perfecting it to fit his objective. Now he boasts about it.

I saw an interview with Pennsylvania voters that illustrates the hypocrisy of the left. The Democrats were enraged by Trump. They said why doesn’t the party rein him in, he is out of control? They said he needed to be stopped and of course they blamed the Republicans for not standing up. Nazi comparisons came in and they branded him a racist.

But then when the same Democrats were asked about what they thought of AOC and the squad, with their statements and animosity against America, they all agreed AOC’s Squad were a good thing. Two of the four expressed they were refreshing and just what Democrats needed. One black woman said she wants them to shake things up. She said it was what Dems needed. See the difference?

They love Democrats acting that way, but Donald Trump is a racist who needs to be controlled. And they did not have any idea they were contradicting themselves. Nope. They wanted more radical talk on the left while condemning language on the right. In fact, Dems want to impeach Trump for his words.

But as soon as Trump focused on the substance of their radical talk, they were enraged and claimed it has to stop. You see what is going on there. We all do. The truth becomes their number one enemy. And Trump represents the truth in the most dangerous form to them — a threat to their radical existence.

Right Ring | Bullright

Racism Railroad

 

All aboard the Racism Railroad!!!

Tickets please

Departure time — immediate

ETA in Raceland — 3…2…1… you are there!

Enjoy the Ride.

*Note: no return trips available

No current travel advisories listed…..

Expect severe discomfort, abrupt warnings and extensive interruptions

Transit owned and operated by STFU Enterprises LLC.

 

Right Ring | Bullright™ ©2019

Disaster Empire

I tried to think of common denominators between the Covington story and the Jussie Smollett story and I found one.

Media. Yeah, I know typical. But the story of fake media doing what they do is a little deeper. The MSM does it for reaction, yes, but to illicit instant reaction.

They want an immediate reaction to their coverage. I think that is their entire angle. Their whole fake news model depends on their need of an instinctive response without delay, making people nothing more than their puppets.

I don’t think they want people to think about it, just react as soon as they see it. Like Ferguson or countless others. They are the clickbators of news. We used to call it sensationalizing but it is worse, they want instant response. So they can always count on it from the left. No thinking needed; just pure emotional reaction.

Double Standard Dems

What else does the left do well besides lie and demonize people? It creates their own double standard…..for virtually everything.

Alan Dershowitz makes that point an issue regarding Henry Ford. It should make a lot of people very uncomfortable. But it probably won’t disturb the left. After all they are home to so much of the anti-Semitism and the hatred today.

Here is an excerpt of his piece, you would have to read it.

Gatestone Institute

Ford devoted his life to two passions: making cars and demonizing Jews. When Hitler said, “I regard Henry Ford as my inspiration,” he wasn’t referring to his car manufacturing. He was referring to Ford’s anti-Semitic ideology that eventuated in the genocide of six million Jews. A large photograph of Ford was prominently displayed in Hitler’s office. The periodical Ford published weekly — The Dearborn Independent — was a polite version of the Nazi newspaper, Der Stürmer. It was circulated throughout the U.S. and around the world. – Alan Dershowitz

He’s right on his observation. I would take issue in part with the suggestions. It should be as widely acknowledged this part of Ford as well as the achievements.

However, I’m not sure banning one’s name for mention or public recognition is the answer. While the left is great for calls to ban or boycott things, I believe that is not the sole answer.

For instance, Luther was very anti-Semitic. as well.(another thing many people don’t realize) Does that mean everything he did must be dismissed and condemned for it?

In fairness, by his comments at the end, Dershowitz distanced himself from that total ban solution. He only posed the question regarding the double standard.

I’m sure you can find other patriots and heroes throughout history with a similar problem. Does one’s entire life get condemned for a certain view? Should it?

Choose Words Wisely

If it is one thing that Governor Infanticide and even Kamala Harris have learned is you should choose words wisely. But neither are willing to change.

It is funny that the party that traffics in verbal assaults, or assassinations, and useful inflammatory rhetoric have now reached the intersection where apparently words still matter to the rest of us, as well as actions.

Such was the case when Northam described the infanticide process advocated by the legislature in Virginia. And it only lost by one vote. Turns out that Virginia is not just for lovers anymore. They demonstrated what their priorities really are on life issues.

What more do we need to know? Now the Left has come out in favor of late-term, partial-birth abortions and even infanticide — albeit in a slightly cagey way. But the only problem they have with it is the words and images used to describe the horrors of it.

They find those factoids and truth bombs about it offensive, not what they are doing nor their death agenda. Just the descriptors of it. That is where words come in. At least until now, Democrats have gone to extremes to assure tight, controlled messages on talking points. They all say the same thing verbatim like trained drones, repeating them over and over to saturate the airwaves. The MSM cranks up the volume.

But that gets harder on live breaking news. And it takes immediate rapid response in addressing them. So when Northam’s comments came out they ran to their corners. All the trained seals said they had not heard the comments, displaying their complete ignorance.

Then, within days of Democrats trying desperately to provide non-answer rebuttals to infanticide, the story of Northam’s college yearbook photos of blackface surfaced.

Voila, finally Democrats and their media entourage had something they could talk about and fiercely condemn. They hadn’t run out to condemn Northam’s infanticide comments. But this blackface stuff they could pounce on in lockstep, along with the media machine.

The infanticide issue seemed like dead wood to the left. The only response was that Roe V Wade is under assault and that Republicans want to take abortion rights away. Never mind this expansion of abortion blowing right on through the delivery day.

But where is the condemnation from the Left or their media partners on the infanticide? Hint: the answer here is not Donald Trump. Silence on infanticide speaks volumes.

Or was the Blackface issue Democrats’ real answer to the infanticide problem?

Right Ring | Bullright

Who says Dems can’t go any lower?

I guess having a white Christmas or even “dreaming of” one is now racist too!?🎄

Notice how Democrats always need to “move on” from anything…..except racism.
And if you happen to laugh at that thought, then you too must be a racist.

 

But speaking of over the top liberal rhetoric in the last post — which turns out to be a bottomless pit to hell — comes this prize work in keeping with liberal tradition.

In other words, there is no such thing as too much or too far for aspiring Leftinistas.

This Michael Harriot of The Root tried desperately to probe the bottom. Then it was deleted. But that didn’t stop him from defending his lone, solitary “hope” later.

After taking the heat he comes back to defend his high hope from a critic:

Nope, no room for virtue signaling in that ballpark. He’s covering deep Left field.

I know, it’s like a game where the left trogs try to outdo each other on the old outrage meter. A practiced skill set; where there are no rules or accountability.

Then here we find out that San Fran Nan and Chuck the Schmucko must be twins separated at birth. Proof is in the pudding. Christmas Eve is so unifying.

Not to be outdone, Chelsea Clinton dabbles in her mother’s forte` of fraternizing with evil.
Call it a genetic gift to a real child prodigy.

Those eyes, don’t they just scream “dark side”?

Hey, let’s throw in the latest Obama slime news too for flavor. Susan Rice never disappoints in serving over-the-top hypocrisy and hyperbole with her lies.

Breitbart

Former Obama National Security Advisor Susan Rice [in a land where they are really never former anything] penned an OP-ED for the New York Times claiming Trump is a bigger threat than any foreign adversary.

NYT:

“The president couldn’t care less about facts, intelligence, military analysis or the national interest. He refuses to take seriously the views of his advisers, announces decisions on impulse and disregards the consequences of his actions. In abandoning the role of a responsible commander in chief, Mr. Trump today does more to undermine American national security than any foreign adversary. Yet no Republican in Congress is willing to do more than bleat or tweet concerns.” [Read]

Hey Suzie Q, there is a little matter of all that unmasking we’d like to talk to you about regarding this whole conspiracy you all cooked up. I know the demands on your time, with writing post-script memos to yourself that take a toll. But inquiring minds have a lot of questions about this national security struggle you seem to be having — along with Obama’s non-scandal record you all hallucinated.

(*In case the Dana Loesch link disappears, here is the original image. There’s a Lincolnesque quality about it.)

Right Ring | Bullright

The Walk Away movement

Here’s a man on a mission who started a new campaign. (maybe not so new since I’ve already seen some others) But this guy, I think, has it nailed.

It is called the #WalkAway campaign…. from the liberal, Democrat left that is.
The author goes by The Unsilent Minority on Facebook. Powerful. (read post on FB)

“…false narratives and conclusions perpetuated by ‘social justice warriors’….”

Checkout Wayne Dupree’s post on it. H/T for spreading the word.
https://www.waynedupree.com/hes-leaving-the-democratic-party/

Well, when the message comes straight from a former “liberal” it is hard to ignore.

(I had trouble loading and watching the video until I posted it here)

Leave it to left to define Roseanne

After throwing his own family under the bus, as the typical Trump -supporting, racist-type family, this NYT columnist says about Roseanne’s show and Trump-supporters:

Read here.

“The dark underbelly of the white, working-class, the intolerance that permeates so much of their lives, is completely absent, and that absence can serve a dangerous purpose: to reinforce the delusion that they’re actually supporting somebody like Donald Trump for honorable reasons.”

But this deserves commentary. It seems so easy for them to try to shove (no pound) Trump supporters into some stereotype but it doesn’t work. That’s probably what frustrates them. It is a delusion, he says, and nothing about their support is honorable.

Rather their view is some distilled elite, deceptive, liberal projection of people that no one in the world should like. Or that is the hope. ‘Who could like these despicable people?’

Maybe he should look in the mirror and face the kind of world view he and his Liberal ilk represents. It is they who are so far off the mainstream of any political alignment with reality, much less the electorate — and proudly bigoted about it.

In truth, as Sterling might say in Twilight Zone, “he seems to have turned into a caricature of himself.” And speaking of dysfunction, how functional could these Leftists be in their families or community? It is also a ruling-class elitist mindset that asserts only they know better how to fix or run your lives. If you only follow their plantation politics.

Maybe I will do a satire on the kind of people Liberals would like to see portrayed to represent their politically correct, leftist view of how a typical family should be and live.

So says the misinformed Lefty antagonist. Trumpism, whatever you term that to be, is not an ideology. You sure missed every lesson offered in 2016.

Hillary takes another bite of her rotten apple

Hillary is the gift that keeps on giving. She offers another excuse — NO IT WAS NOT AN APOLOGY — for her latest deplorable statements.

After even Democrats objected to what she said, she dug in with an explanation for what she said. How could anyone call that an apology?

(What she originally said) –“[Democrats] do not do well with white men, and we don’t do well with married, white women,” she said. “And part of that is an identification with the Republican Party, and a sort of ongoing pressure to vote the way that your husband, your boss, your son, whoever, believes you should,”

Actually, even Dick Durbin was asked about her statement, saying it was “not helpful.” Then he quibbled with the amount of people. So it was the number he disputed?

Now she does a face-plant on Facebook:

“I understand how some of what I said upset people and can be misinterpreted. I meant no disrespect to any individual or group. And I want to look to the future as much as anybody.”

You understand why you offended so many people! Yet you persist in saying it. Misinterpreted? Meant no disrespect? It was all about disrespecting people who did not vote for you. In her cremation of facts on Facebook, she said:

“My first instinct was to defend Americans and explain how Donald Trump could have been elected. I said that places doing better economically typically lean Democratic, and places where there is less optimism about the future lean Republican.”

No, your instinct was not to defend Americans but your failed bid for president. The only way to do that is to slander the people who voted against you, including women.

“THAT doesn’t mean the coasts versus the heartland, it doesn’t even mean entire states. In fact, it more often captures the divisions between more dynamic urban areas and less prosperous small towns within states.”

Yes, you did mean the coastal regions versus the heartland. Forward looking places like California — who are in the midst of seceding from the union you ran to be president of!

“As I said throughout the campaign, Trump’s message was dark and backwards looking. I don’t need to list the reasons, but the foundation of his message, “Make America Great AGAIN” suggests that to be great we have to go back to something we are no longer. I never accepted that and never will.”

Darkness is creating jobs, bringing back the economy to forgotten people who aren’t in your leftist silo? Leveling the field of trade, reducing deficits is backward?

She closes with another face plant, like the one she narrowly avoided on the steps.

“So to those upset or offended by what I said last week, I hope this explanation helps to explain the point I was trying to make. And I hope now that we can get back to the real business before us: Protecting our democracy and building a future we can all share.”

Your point was as clear as the deplorable comment was. It does help, only to solidify your disdain for voters. You weren’t about “protecting democracy” but rigging it! A future that the rest of us cannot possibly share in, unless they are an elitist like you.

But one can never believe anything she says anyway.

Read my earlier (mind reading) translation of what she meant here.

Right Ring | Bullright

SOTUS causes a planetary threat

Well, planet Librtard had a brief brush with our atmosphere last night, beginning at approximately 9:00 pm. The encounter lasted about an hour and 15 minutes. No response was issued from NORAD but they were obviously keeping an eye on developments.

Yes, Trump gave his first SOTUS and as you might expect some were not happy about it. Not that he could have said anything that would have quieted their phobia(s).

Daily Caller:

MSNBC host Joy Ann Reid found Trump’s appeals to patriotism quite terrifying. “Church … family … police … military … the national anthem … Trump trying to call on all the tropes of 1950s-era nationalism. The goal of this speech appears to be to force the normalization of Trump on the terms of the bygone era his supporters are nostalgic for,” Reid tweeted during the speech.

The American Civil Liberties Union bemoaned Trump said “America” too many times and that it was done in an “exclusionary” way.

Illinois Rep. Luis Gutierrez, Congress’ number one immigration booster, walked out of the speech after Republicans began chanting “U.S.A.” Gutierrez later issued a statement claiming the president’s speech was translated from Russian and that his remarks were “explicitly racist.”

Those USA chants must have set their hair on fire. Gutierrez had to walk out because he was so offended. Ah, don’t let the door hit you. But it was not just at the SOTUS, it began before Trump even left the White House.

Listening to CNN, Congressman Clyburn framed it in clear Nazi terms, comparing Trump to the earlier years of Hitler’s rise – “what was going on in Germany around 1934.”. When asked if he was directly comparing him to Hitler, he was undeterred. He said if he was making a direct comparison he would say Trump was Mussolini and Putin was Hitler. Nice. Make sure people know what you mean. He also said some of them were going to go to the SOTUS to ‘stare down’ Trump.

Right after the speech, Jake Tapper said Trump “had one hand out and one fist in the air.” From the network with both fists in the air.

Ref see: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2018/01/rep_clyburn_trumps_america_like_hitlers_1934_germany_.html

Racism, Russia and Impeachment

In a shell, you have Dems entire 2018 strategy. But you can add tactics like obstruction or give us back your money and our power. They need all the help they can get.

Just say all the Dems running for the House this year will simply be Pelosi-bots, since she is not going anywhere. That’s what is at stake. It’s Democrats’ political Armageddon.

But 2018 all comes down to a simple question. What would you rather do: Make America Great Again; or Make Pelosi Great Again? So we have to beat Pelosi’s band of bots.

CNN goes into sewergate mode

So CNN broke yet another all time record. No, it wasn’t for fake news or lies. They do enough of that. It was for the number of times they used shithole on TV, in one day. They found all kinds of ways to use it to quote Trump comment of “shithole countries.”

Where is George Carlin? Wherever he is, he must be having one great big laugh right now. Carlin might say, “but even I was never being self-righteous about it.”

No one could count the number of times they said it. One analyst, Phil Mudd, went on a tear using shithole about 10 times along with the N word twice in a few minutes. He’s suggesting Shitholer tee shirts. I think they got a second record for the number of times they said racism, too. Oh, a third on the number of times they called Trump a racist.

This was the network that fired Jeffrey Lord just for mocking Media Matters by writing “Sieg Heil” at their fascist agenda. Now they surpassed George Carlin but they weren’t joking. They are dead serious about Shithole-gate. But a record that will be very hard to break. CNN didn’t seem to mind when Hillary called half the country a basket of deplorables. This from the shithole Network.

But hey, Anderson and Andy were doing shots of tequila in Times Square on New Years Eve. And Randi Kaye was in Colorado on the Cannabis bus testing bongs New Years Eve. So CNN is all about pushing any limits. Now, shithole just rolls off their tongue.

Right Ring | Bullright

Rice the evil spewer

In Obama’s second term, Rabbi Shmuley Boteach argued why Rice should be kept from Sec of State, but because of Rwanda.

“But what is not arguable is that she deserves to be denied the post for a different reason [than Benghazi] altogether: Rwanda. What emerges when taken together — Rice’s weak response in Benghazi, blaming the murder of four Americans on a stupid video, and her shameful lack of action in the Rwandan genocide — is a career diplomat of singular weakness, lacking the spine or muscularity to assert American moral influence in the world.

Rice was part of Bill Clinton’s National Security Team that in 1994 refused any involvement whatsoever in the Rwanda genocide, leaving more than 800,000 men, women, and children to be hacked to death by machete in the fastest genocide ever recorded.”

Both events argue against any noble-good notion, when she was involved in both.

Rice now writes in a NYT op-ed article: “Susan Rice: When America No Longer Is a Global Force for Good

“President Trump’s National Security Strategy marks a dramatic departure from the plans of his Republican and Democratic predecessors, painting a dark, almost dystopian portrait of an “extraordinarily dangerous” world characterized by hostile states and lurking threats. There is scant mention of America’s unrivaled political, military, technological and economic strength, or the opportunities to expand prosperity, freedom and security through principled leadership — the foundation of American foreign policy since World War II.

In Mr. Trump’s estimation, we live in a world where America wins only at others’ expense. There is no common good, no international community, no universal values, only American values. America is no longer “a global force for good,” as in President Obama’s last strategy, or a “shining city on a hill,” as in President Reagan’s vision. The new strategy enshrines a zero-sum mentality: “Protecting American interests requires that we compete continuously within and across these contests, which are being played out in regions around the world.” This is the hallmark of Mr. Trump’s nationalistic, black-and-white “America First” strategy.”#

America is no longer “a global force for good,” as in President Obama’s last strategy. So she claims Obama’s strategy, or policy, was “a global force for good.” Fancy that when it was exactly the opposite in action. It consistently stood in the face of a good legacy.

The ME and their Muslim Brotherhood obsession, then the anti-Israel platform, the Benghazi debacle — with or without the gun running — botched with mistakes and denials from the beginning, the Syrian issue of mixed messages and disappearing red lines, Russian influence throughout, the bad Iranian deal at all costs to us, ignorance on N Korea, and ISIS sprouting an official Caliphate in Syria and Iraq, reactionary spiteful withdrawal from Iraq, depleting our military, politicizing military intell and rules of engagement, not enforcing laws here in this country and politicizing the DOJ and intelligence.

Add to it the radicalization of government at home, with a war on energy, and lies about current events that were impossible to ignore. (the media really tried their best) I won’t even get into the racism for lack of space.

So we’re to infer all that was part of a “global force for good. If it was, then I’d like to know what a global force of empowering evil would look like? So all the above were part of the force for good? But now she has the arrogance and audacity to call Trump basically a force for bad. Here fellow comrades like Rhodes and Pfeiffer were on social media calling for the obituaries of current leadership. I hate to rain on her parade — or march — but the last 8 years was no picnic or vacation from evil. In fact, it was awash in it and corruption. Yet hearing her call it a force for good is hilarious.

This week we confirmed that Obama’s administration was so eager to get an Iran deal at any cost that they stood down on actions against Hezbollah’s international crime and terrorism operation. Let’s forget the Uranium deal for the moment. Politicizing and weaponizing government made it a force for good?

Now that all the skeletons are falling out of the closets (there aren’t enough closets) she is pointing fingers at the Trump administration, like her comrades. That rapid, immediate withdrawal from Iraq set off a chain of events. At home, Obama was so worried about his scummy legacy that he couldn’t have events called terrorism.

But all of that was part of some “global force for good.” What’s her definition of good?

Then back up a moment. She also called Trump’s policies a zero sum game that requires everyone else lose in order for us to win. We haven’t seen anything like that. Trump hasn’t called for that. Actually, he holds that they are winning while we are winning. But contrast that with Obama where we constantly lost on the deals and the world, or others, always won. That was more the zero-sum game. We weren’t really meant to win in Obama’s view.

She then goes for “enshrining Mr. Trump’s harsh anti-immigration policies, from the border wall to ending family preferences and limiting refugee admissions.” Again, contrast that with Obama’s mixed signals about border control, catch and release, and unconstitutional DACA program, and opening us to external threats in wartime. Refugees that were at least partly created by his own policies of complicit ignorance.

The perpetual do-gooder also made a policy of ignoring Christian persecutions while favoring Muslim refugees. He could only point to one major accomplishment of getting Osama bin Laden, but allowed a caliphate to form and spread, referring to it as JV. Yet he didn’t really take on that JV squad. Instead, he simply said it was not Islamic. Imagine that, a caliphate that is not Islamic? Oh, he banned using accurate terms to describe that caliphate of terrorism.

Enough contradictions in there to show she is shoveling more bullshit? What’s worse is they know, but have a constant need to deceive, try to control the narrative and revise Obama’s entire legacy. The people didn’t see it his way either, which showed in the election. Again, argue against the results and legitimacy of the election. Now…. they are going to lecture us on being a do-gooder? How about people just do what is right, and forget this false do-good narrative? Although I used to think that doing the right thing was being a force for good!

Right Ring | Bullright