Which Way Is Up? Government Solutions To Government Problems

Someone on Fox reminded everyone that just years ago many Democrats were chanting to get the government out of the bedroom. He joked how now they are in the kitchen. I think it was Stephen Moore. Well, the times they are a changing.

Now I’d like to take that a few steps further. Yes, they have gotten into the kitchen. They have raided the entire house swat style. And they’re only getting started.

But I’d like to keep government out of the bedroom; out of the kitchen; out of the pantry; out of the laundry room; out of the bathroom; out of the garage and basement. And keep it the hell off that roof, too.

That is not to forget luv-gov getting into those phone lines, either from the pole or tower. They’re getting in it, keeping a record diary on you as personal as your DNA. But hell, they got that too anytime they feel an intimate need for it, let’s say.

You might say that in jest for a laugh but it is true.

They have designs on all of it, right into your home — you only thought was a sanctuary. But then government,  or its pimps, want to follow the kids to school and weasel its way into their sexuality or gender identification. Start children out on pronouns and next they’ll be on hormones, preparing to have genitalia and breasts removed. Plus, an alternative is always drag therapy.

If you happen to notice it, well, the joke is on you because you are the nutjob. You are the bigoted pervert and they are the knight in shinny armor saving the vulnerable, at risk children from fruit-loopy parents now classified as “domestic terrorists.”

But I’m sure that, like gas stoves, all this is cooked up by conspiracy loons and none of it is true. Right? I mean no way is gubmint this obsessed with us personally. Or that is what they’ll tell you when they haul off and arrest you for voicing any real concerns about it. But that is before marching you off to “terrorist reprogramming camp” at an undisclosed location; where they tell you those were not your kids, but are now under the safe protection of government affiliates — let’s call them.

When before all this you assumed you had rights, which were forfeited when you dissented with their socio-political agenda. So something they denied called the culture wars, which did not even exist, turned out to be very real means to pursue their sinister political ends.

To my horror, the excuse or reason on which they justify most of this incursion is science. A thing called science apparently tells them, over their shoulder, to do all this evil stuff.

Even Darwin could not have foreseen the birds and bees switching places; nor imagined species identity being chosen, not scientifically verified — with government officiating it.

So it is 2023 but you would think it was 1984.

Right Ring | Bullright | 2023

The Bitter Arts Show And Glow

The Bitter Arts were preforming their farts
For all the world to see.
With adoration to all the popping corn,
It was received in a fest of glee.

The most deviant parts of the arts
Were adorned with all their pomp,
And those without it felt naked throughout.
Fright night on the red velvet carpet.

It doesn’t end there, as it never does.
Most memories fade but deviant arts remain,
Cloistered in their robust attire,
Dazzlingly postured for future hire.

They are unforgettable events
With the utmost in fashion scents,
Made to allure the most naive.
So hats off to the ladies and gents,
Or of whatever x-gender you choose.

You will never loose at the Bitter Arts,
It has something to tickle every fetish.
Blow past all parameters and taboos,
It promises to be a remarkable affair.

So active deviants strike your pose
Because everyone knows,
You will attract the attention
Of all who are in the know.

Sit back and watch their crimson plot
Designed just for you if you dare
Or those who think like they.

Meet them and greet them
Oh but from a distance.
You shan’t shame or defame them.

Unshamable is the new theme
To this year’s hot scene;
Take it all in as you cringe and grin.
It is for you they perform,
and perform they must.

 

Right Ring | Bullright | 2023

Three Letters Of Conspiracy

Flashback alert. One popular thing among kids way back was theorizing about who was really running the country? The real question though was the President in control, running the country or not? A number of ideas would come up at any given time.

The common idea was, whoever the president, he probably could not be running it. Popular theory was either the military industrial complex (ref IKE) or any number of shadowy, unelected people who, behind the scenes, actually pulled the strings of control . It was only a guess but about as popular as sci-fi was in those days.

Now today we can say for certain from a body of public information that this president is definitely not running the show. Still, shadowy others lurch in the background who do run it. That can hardly be contested or debated anymore. It’s self-evident this president is not in control of his own faculties let alone a behemoth government, which got even bigger since the old days. (when you walked to and from school uphill both ways)

We have pretty good ideas on others who do have their hands on the levers, most of whom are in the executive branch anyway. People can and do speculate. However, a weird possibility pops up now, stranger than all the old conspiracies. It lies within one agency.

Back to the reasons it is important to have some trust in a president. We wouldn’t want a guy who is potentially compromised who could be blackmailed. But that is the exact situation we have. There’s no doubt Biden is compromised and open to blackmail.

But today, some of those who could potentially blackmail him are within this country. I don’t mean his unsavory contacts over the years, even those in his family. A blackmailer would have to know things or something so important it compromises the integrity of the office. Again, that would be a 3-letter agency right in our government apparatus.

How is that, you ask? Well, undoubtedly the FBI knows more about Joe Biden than anyone else, outside of Biden Inc. Think about the treasure trove of information they have or know about Joe — many years’ worth. They even have Hunter’s laptop sitting on a secret shelf. So is the FBI capable of blackmailing the president? Again, yes. What have they not been willing to do or exploit over recent years? Experience says yes.

Now let’s go back to who is actually in control of the White House, or the country. Someone would have to have the dirt on him in order to control the strings of power. Controlling those strings also means deciding if he should run for president. If they decided no, Joe may not even have a chance. They could destroy him or render him unfit. So who could destroy Joey and also knows all the dirt? You come up with one entity.

But who has also proved they have power to influence elections or control the political dialogue? Are we talking about the same shadowy people who are also in that 3-letter agency? I think so. Why else would they act as arrogant as they do. They made him and they can end his presidency, seems to be their deduction.

No longer do you have to worry about malicious foreign actors when you have a conniving cadre within government operating the same way. Bureaucrats move over, there’s a new sheriff in town. The “seven ways to Sunday” agency is very large and in charge, or so they believe. What we think of it becomes only an opinion. Just saying…

So Joey, how would you like a nice counter-intell investigation to go with your morning oatmeal and afternoon nap? Make us an offer we can’t refuse. You’re going to do what?

 

Wikipedia: “Variations of the deep state have existed as popular conspiracy theories in the United States since the 1950s.

“Although the term ‘deep state’ is thought to have originated in Turkey in the 1990s, belief in the concept of a deep state has been present in the United States since at least the 1950s. A 1955 article in the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, quotes Americans sharing their belief in the existence of a “dual state”: a hidden national security hierarchy and shadow government that monitors and controls elected politicians.”

Right Ring | Bullright | 2023

The Biden Garage Meets Its Scandalous Fate

We are covering a breaking, fast moving story at the Biden Garage — now known as Garagegate — involving evolving details on a high-octane government documents scandal.

If you are following Biden’s latest fiasco: first my lawyers originally discovered some documents and contacted the archives. Then my lawyers advised me not to look at them.

Now it has all the classic details: a fast car, negligence, secrecy and Biden stupidity that we’ve come to expect from the gaffe machine. Oh and his trademark lies and coverup.

The question is how can a guy who cares nothing about protecting the border manage to secure his own garage? Well, who cares anyway, just like the border?

I’m being told by sources deep inside the Biden Garage that the Genie garage-door opener company will be subpoenaed to testify in a high-octane Special Counsel investigation scandal developing as we speak. But the need for speed was apparently not an issue since this scandal has been on slow burn since early November.

I have it on good authority that the glove box is not talking and the ’67 Corvette is remaining suspiciously silent. What happened?

But hold on there, if you are about to lose your mind then you are not alone.

The scenario summary in layman’s terms. Since Joey Bananas has never been especially challenged to stick to the facts, neither are we.

For instance, Joey might inadvertently keep some important documents in the glove box of his ’67 Corvette, you know…. right next to his designer aviators. All locked up of course.

Not like they were sitting there in the open! It’s not like the car was sitting in the street or the keys were in it. You didn’t know ’68 Vettes were notoriously secure, especially when safely parked in a garage. There’s no need to confiscate the Corvette then.

No, the alleged classified government documents were as secure as anything else in the Biden family, or its incestuous household. No one talks and no one loses their family shares in Biden Inc or family jewels. It’s just that simple.

Garages are not known for their security, you might say. But that’s the beauty of it; no one thinks to look in the garage or next to it for classified government documents. You got to keep up with the Bidens.

Did you see Joe’s bike ride at the beach in Delaware, and his space walk up the AF1 stairs? Joey’s very secure in his faculties and his faculty, like Penn’s, are very secure. Not a joke. You might checkout the sand castle Joey built on the beach, too, provided you can get past the new perimeter wall.

But take it from Joey: One of the things I like to do in my spare time at my home, besides tinkering with my Corvette, is read in my library to remember the good old days. When you didn’t have to pay ten bucks for an ice cream cone or ninety bucks to fill up your hot rod to have a good time.

There just isn’t enough time in the day to describe all the places Joe might stash some important government documents. So many possibilities. Sooner or later, Biden will fill in all the details…. or maybe not.

So a lock-down of the Biden Garage, the coveted Corvette and the resident gaffe machine will be ordered to avoid any potential conflict of interest.

What did Joe have to say regarding the pending special counsel appointment?

I have since been advised by counsel that no further comments are warranted, due to the ongoing investigation.

Only in the Biden family could the Garage get its own Special Counsel investigation. But a guy like Biden, with almost 50 years experience exclusively in government, could have the talent to pull off a Garagegate that even an AG Garland could not resist.

Well, unless it is all part of the perpetual coverup saga. Oh, the sordid details of the unprecedented era of Biden scandal to kick off a new year.

Live from Wilmington DE, it’s the latest Biden scandal — there is a party going on in Joe’s garage and Swat wasn’t invited. If you’re a Biden, you have to be different from everyone else in the neighborhood. Anyone else can have a classic car in the garage, but who can have classified documents in there too? Keeping up with the Bidens must be tough.

Joey Bananas might not be ready for prime time, but his garage is.
Little deuce coup[sic], you don’t know what I’ve got.

Think of it this way, Joe invented the first ever drive-in SCIF.
Do we need to see a driveway photo layout of documents? Just spare us the gaslighting.

Right Ring | Bullright | 2023

Who Is Joey?

Who really is Joey Bananas anyway? It’s a fair question. This week he told a press conference in a fake Italian accent: “I may be Irish, but I’m not stupid. I married Dominic Giacoppa’s daughter so, you know, I got a little Italian in me now.”

What did he mean by that? Only his hairdresser knows.

Was he insinuating he married a girl whose family is genetically connected to the Italian mob? Does that make him a made-man by marriage? Does it mean our First Lady has connections to Italians and the mob? Is he romancing Italian mob family stereotypes?

Actually, it was Jill’s grandfather who was connected to that name, not Jill’s father. So he even has his family tree screwed up.

Joe Biden: "I may be Irish, but I'm not stupid! I married Dominic Giacoppa's daughter."

FACT CHECK: Giacoppa was actually Jill Biden's grandfather, not her father. pic.twitter.com/ZBNNRrsEcU

— Steve Guest (@SteveGuest) December 16, 2022

Of course no one can know with Joey Bananas because one day it’s his Irish ancestors and the next he’s pretending to be part Italian. How much people care about any of it seems a fair point. They don’t. So why would he drop such crude, dual stereotypes in the middle of official conversations to the public?

Joe is a walking, talking, racist bigot that apparently thinks this shtick works for him. He thinks this is significant to the minds of the public, which is even worse. That he just throws these stereotypes around as fillers in conversation shows how much he pays attention to people’s nationality or heritage.

But nowhere in his background does he have any royal ancestor or something that could designate him as the king he believes he is. He doesn’t discuss his symbiotic heritage with the Chinese though. He has plenty more in common with them than he does Italians — other than the fact that he fashions himself as some kind of a mob or union boss.

This guy is dripping with these cultural stereotypes. He always diverts to them for some reason, even at important times. Jill’s family’s last name is Jacobs but that doesn’t stop Joe from playing the Italian card. The La Cosa Nostra is alive and well, and dwelling mostly in Joey’s remaining brain cells.

It usually is a sign of insecurity when someone feels he or she must pretend to be someone they are not to other people. How freaking insecure is this jerk? Well, we haven’t heard the last of Joey Bananas’ stereotypes. That’s Joe.

Right Ring | Bullright | 2022

NYT Strike Creates Unequaled Opportunities

I’m about to break an exclusive. The New York Times is on strike and has apparently been scrambling behind the scenes to tweak their hiring policy, as the need for workers could be huge if the strike continues. No word on how long that could be. Enter plan B.

So as a news hound myself, I got a hold of a draft copy of a screening questionnaire they are planning on using — should the need occur to hire mass replacements.

Filling out the questionnaire appropriately will get you on the fast track for consideration. This is meant to sort of weed out the undesirables, if they try to breach NYT defenses. Being multiple choice the options are limited. Here is the satirical draft.

Please complete this revised questionnaire for consideration at NYT — the avowed paper of record.

We like to say there are no wrong answers, but only wrong people (who hold them). And the wrong ones can find plenty of opportunities elsewhere.

Have you ever voted for Donald Trump?
A)No
B)Yes, I made a huge mistake. — (okay, we like groveling)

How emotionally attached are you to truth?
A)Only modestly to preserve my image
B)Not so much
C)My truth is all that concerns me
D)What is truth?

Is America the greatest country on the planet?
A)Not by a long shot
B)No better than any other 3rd word regime out there.
C)Yes (We don’t have any positions available with your qualifications)

Is climate change the largest factor in everything?
A)Yes
B)It is the only factor that matters
C)Climate change is the answer to any problem
D) It is the top issue on the planet
E)No — (you may exit this survey – you are not our type.)

Are you so proud of your individual sexuality that you need to share it with everyone, especially those who aren’t interested and with under-age minors?
A)Yes
B)No — (don’t be frustrated, continue on)

Are pronouns an important priority in any of your social media?
A)Of course
B)I rate all people by their use of pronouns
C)I don’t understand the importance of pronouns. (get out of here now, and stop trying to pretend or we will report your account for harassment)

Would you characterize yourself as a proud American?
A)No
B)Only if by American you mean the new woke America?
C) Proud American is a repulsive term to me.
D) Yes — (you have been warned at least twice to exit)

Is gender a valid biological description?
A)No
B)Gender should only mean an individual’s definition, if they have one.
C)Biology is so 19th century
D)Biology is a form of fascism
E)All the above – (you may have excellent potential here)

How well do you work with others?
A)Only if I get my way
B)Just for purposes of politics and perception of others.
C)I rarely create/have issues with others, unless they don’t accept my sexuality.
D)Always — (you are probably not what we are looking for, but there is always flipping burgers)

Lastly, what kind of salary would you be interested in?
A)Whatever you got.
B)Something I can live on in the lifestyle I am accustomed to.
C)I can be flexible.
D)Salary commensurate with the amount of shit I have to put up with.

Have you ever been a felon?
A) Why? (please elaborate ______________)
B)Why not? (Briefly explain______________)
C)I am connected to Antifa

*Captcha question to make sure you are a real person:

Is 1+1 greater or greater less than one? A)Greater B)Less

If you got to the end of the survey, we will be in contact with you soon. We look forward to your sensational interview. – NYST

Could this be the very real, near future?

Right Ring | Bullright | 2022

Take The L-Train, Don’t Complain

So here we are a month out from elections and things don’t look any better than they did before election. I know it is not really a loss, supposedly, but it certainly didn’t render the judgement we preferred.

Sure there are plenty of reasons for that — elections post pandemic being what they are. But I am not in the sympathy business. What has really changed? Right on cue we got the Georgia verdict.  Warnock drones were active, similar to the Fetterman drones.

It doesn’t help that almost immediately the attention shifts to the 2024 election. But if we are not accomplishing anything yet, under these circumstances, how do you have confidence in 2024?

~~~~~~

Media will do what it loves, shift all the attention to Donald Trump and any investigations they have on the docket. At this point, even the groundhog is getting dizzy. Once again, on cue they got a crocked up verdict against the Trump Org .

And it seems the conversation has not changed one bit. “Don’t pay any attention to media” is the mantra everywhere of conservatives. You can’t trust anything they say.

Speaking of media and their nefarious ability to puke and return to their vomit, Elon Musk has his hands full just trying to put out the truth in Twitter Files on 2020. Well, until you realize how controversial that can be.

So Elon will have to add more private security and eliminate public events because of all the current death threats. And at this point he’d have to consider the personal risk from the Feds for exposing their little electioneering scheme with social media. But Musk said no more public photo opportunities.

Well, it’s the price of trying to do the right thing and telling any truth. Doing that is quite risky lately. Can’t hardly blame some people for laying low. Oh, the price must be paid for standing for right and wrong. “Controversy” now is anything that doesn’t agree with the left’s and media’s narrative of the day. Mess with that and you can draw the death card.

Meanwhile, Joey’s prescription for the public is 1099’s on any transaction over 600 bucks. From the founder of Biden Inc who had over a 150 SAR (suspicious activity reports) from bank transactions, which no one is allowed to see now. But Beijing Biden wants a tax document trail filed on every transaction for John, Joe or Mary of 600 or more.

Though Joe hasn’t shown us the Biden Inc transactions. Those would be where his son, or someone, paid the expenses and bills on his abode in Delaware. Illegal and qualify as gifts, a no no, which likely was not claimed as income for him or Jill.

Plus, we don’t know the secretive relationship or the donor amounts on a fund held at Penn State University in Pennsylvania. Nope, that’s on lock down but we know China is a top to that (slush) fund donor. No surprise.

And now we know the Congress got their mittens on at least 6 years of IRS tax returns of Donald Trump, with the Supreme’s approval. I’m sure those will be ferreted out and parsed out (read leaked) for public consumption, as they see the need.

You and I or whoever Joe America is anymore, seeing how the left hates the country, has to suffer what they are putting us through. As if inflation and economic calamity was not bad enough, with energy prices through the roof as well. But it is all intentionally directed at us just as it was in Venezuela. If they can get jokers like Fetterman, Biden and Warnock elected, then what pray tell can they have done to the rest of us on a whim?

Take the L-Train and don’t complain, say the growing leftist chants. “Heed the warning.”

Right Ring | Bullright | 2022

Tweety Leaks

So Elon Musk taps Matt Taibbi to do an analysis on Twitter’s pre-election behavior in 2020, where they banned a legitimate news story, among its other party activities. They acted in unison with all the MSM, DNC and Deep State apparatus assisting.

Now Democrat cult members are whining about the nasty revelations. “Boo, hiss, Elon!”

Dear distraught Democrats:
Let me know if we ever get an honest review or autopsy from MSM, or its operatives, over any of their huge “press” failures. I’ll be waiting!

Oh, but the minute Elon Musk probes the legacy media’s integrity and credibility deficit, you are all suddenly enraged and moving to China ….where free speech is valued.

They owe America a collective apology. And it will be arriving on the first day of never.

But it is weird how we haven’t witnessed a mass exodus of Democrats leaving the country, yet. I didn’t know the airlines were so backed up, or tickets were that hard to get.

Right Ring | Bullright | 2022

Disaster Relief In A Shape-Shifting World

From the bowels of disbelief, where common sense seems to get vomited out.

My friends, it is time for a word from a rambling cynic about disaster relief. There are areas in the country that for one reason or another are more prone to natural disasters. In those areas, there are hurricanes, tornadoes, floods, or earthquake and fires. These are justifiably natural disasters.

Now understandably some people aren’t crazy about it, but there is room and need for federal responses to help in those horrific times. Sometimes there are warnings, even if short, and other times there are no warnings at all when people or towns are slammed by a disaster causing millions or billions in damages. It is nice to know federal government has a department that has come to specialize in disaster responses of all types.

After all it is a monumental task for towns or cities to respond often on no notice to a natural disaster that seemed to come out of nowhere, which almost stops the clock on daily routines or activities of the simplest kind — from getting groceries to schools and work, to local services. It throws lifestyle and lives into a frenzy. We know some of them by name and others by what they are, be it twisters or floods. They are catastrophic events when lives are on the line. We pray and have first-responders who turn into heroes on a moments notice.

We are thankful for those responders and yes, thankful also for the government who can step in at these times with the resources to help. That is the kind of help we need to stabilize a chaotic time and hopefully add more organization and aid to traumatic events. Some may wish it wasn’t necessary but often it is, and can make a big difference. Not everyone sits around with the equipment and resources to take on an emergency crisis out of nowhere. Often we don’t know ahead of time what will be needed. We can only predict but predictions fall short. So we can use or need the extra resource-power and help.

So what of it when this seems to be stood on its head? What about when the very process goes very wrong? What happens when the process is abused or reversed? I mean by that when government becomes the problem and not the solution. Yes, it is a real thing.

We have seen horrible films about the causes of all types of disasters, some natural and some man-made. I have been leading here up to a certain point. Some disasters do have causes, unlike purely natural disasters with weather and phenomena.

We don’t actually control the elements regardless what some would like us to believe. We aren’t going to stop a tornado. We can only prepare for them, should they occur. Blaming ice melt in the Arctic for a flood seems rather pointless when you think about it. A shark attack cannot simply be blamed on fishermen. Things can and do what they are going to do. However, preparedness may be a key to riding out a catastrophe. The cause and effect of many natural disasters is very scant. But prevention of them is a whole other matter.

So we know what natural disasters are, and we know what man-made catastrophes are. They both require a cleanup or response when they happen. And we often add to it that our response tends to bring people together. That is important too.

Now for the other hand. This one can be just as bad and horrific.

But now we have a new phenomena, more recent and tragic nonetheless. We have crises and disasters that are generated by government, then dispersed across the country. They are created for the most part by coastal elites in Washington that also think they know better than the rest of the country how we should live, work, or do any of the things we do with our lives. These diabolical maniacs of ego and power are usually not so connected to the people who suffer the effects. These creators of catastrophe live in safe areas and bubbles normally removed from the real effects. But there is trauma, heartbreak, pain (lots of it), and tragic effects in these disasters too.

With these government generated crises the first response is to deny they are happening; then claim they are only minor, and dismiss them as real problems. The latest strain of disasters are the intentional ones. They certainly don’t want to take responsibility for it.  They would rather try to blame us or our perception, and dismiss the cause altogether.

That is why I decided to call them Disaster Deniers. Not only do they deny the crises but they want to make sure you do not connect any of it with them. That seems to be their entire concern that they get any blame. So they look around for anything to point to as the cause — anything but them. One after another we see and feel the effects.

But when the people suffer “a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.”

Maybe we should  reread the Declaration of Independence before every election, then vote accordingly. Think of it as disaster protection insurance or disaster relief.

This is why I wrote another post on “The Prose of Election Politics.” We know how to deal with natural disasters. Do we know how to deal with man-made disasters, and those who deny them? I find it hard to believe most people in the country deny the crises in front of them or the cause.  The coastal elites are not even trying very hard to hide the cause anymore. They just think we have no capacity to deal with it, even if we are aware of it.

Take for instance Pennsylvania’s Senatorial election. They did elect Fetterman, as I begrudgingly predicted. So in the face of disasters and crises from Washington, how can you go and vote for more of it and for someone like Fetterman? Well, we know. They will absolutely vote for anyone who is put in front of them. Okay, but then just don’t act to the rest of us like it is doing something toward the problems by voting for him.

Now take a look at the county map of PA for a breakdown. NBC has a decent one. It shows a whole lot of red on it. In county after county, Fetterman had low numbers. There were counties where he had only 15% or 19%. But radical Dems ran up the numbers in Philly (82%). So there must be a lot of people in PA who are livid at the outcome. Why should their process and decision be hijacked by these uber radical areas? It’s another man-made, government-created disaster brought to you by the same disaster deniers.

Remember the words of Rahm Emanuel: “never let a crisis go to waste.” (even if and especially if you created it yourself)

That long train is only getting longer and longer. Who’s pretending the train doesn’t exist?

 

Right Ring | Bullright | 2022

The Prose Of Election Politics

It could be time for a national detox program. We’ve done our best to talk Democrats out of a severe anti-reality state they have been locked into. But we had no luck, they refuse to be rational. Now the only question is will they also refuse rational treatment?

So what does it mean, all the things Dems said and ran on in the course of campaigning? Well, it signals that they have not found the bottom of the barrel yet. But they tried.

Now we will go from election politics to antics. The antics of radical activism in the face of losing is always better than admitting any loss. That can mean, and usually does, anything goes. We can expect the misery of their refusal to accept the prognosis and treatment protocol. Well, that is when things get ugly. They will want to determine and control that process when, in effect, they are the sick patient. There might be a standoff.

But through the 2022 midterm campaigns, Dems basically told people that “if you vote for Republicans everything is going to break.” The sky will fall; life or society will fall apart.

The bitter reality is that this idea is so hilarious. What is not broken now? Democrats did their damnedest to rip apart the fabric of America to reveal an ideological evil we haven’t seen before. Their entire idea was to tear the system apart, from the economy to the justice system to the national security of America and border. It’s been ugly and part of what drives Democrats is the resistance from rational people to accept their failed ideas.

Look at reality — and it isn’t pretty — they spent two years breaking anything and everything in the country: starting with 550 riots in 2020 to compromise civil society, and eventually culminating into what they’ve done to our education system. They did their best to squash our national energy policies that were benefiting the country, and even stomp out any dialogue about it. Then they turned their axe against the idea of public safety and our justice system. They put special emphasis on weaponizing a crime wave into a political assault on citizens. Criminals took notice. They attacked our economy with all the vigor they could muster. But in it all, it was really the American people they were attacking. We were the intended target.

So with all the damage in the wake of Democrats’ one-party reign over our country, they then said democracy was under assault by people who only wanted to restore a sense of normalcy. People who just wanted their basic liberty back, on the heels of shutdowns and lock downs. A pandemic that was weaponized against the people.  ‘No respite for them,‘ say tyrannical Democrats, who turned the people into their enemy.

Now the Democrats run on this thing called “saving democracy” while making veiled threats against anyone who doesn’t line up with that narrative. We were considered the enemy of the state. Parents at school board meetings became domestic terrorists. The Patriot Act should be rolled out on them hard. No mercy.

And Democrats watched the assault on freedom in Canada with great enthusiasm. If only they could crack down on us like Trudeau was doing up north. If only Dems could shut down organizing and speech the way he was doing. The plan was to criminalize freedom-loving patriots by turning them into a “threat” to the very democracy that patriots were trying to salvage from the hands of institutionalized radicalism. A twisted deception.

No, we said, the true threat is systemic radicalism controlling our system of governance. Save us from ourselves. As Pogo said, “we met the [real] enemy, and the enemy is us.” Or people that hate America anyway and will do anything to put it down, and then transform it into something we were never meant to be. That is the real threat to America.

What are Democrats anyway? With all the damage they’ve done and are still doing, it’s time for another term. The only descriptor for Democrats is: Disaster Deniers.

 

Meanwhile … democracy is on the ropes, under threat, at risk, on the ballot!

Right Ring | Bullright | 2022

From “Democracy” To Trump

While the word democracy from Leftists echoes from sea to shining sea…

Democrats are busy working on plans that if Donald Trump should decide to run for election in 2024, they (Dems in power) are going to create and appoint a special counsel investigation on him. All based on his decision to run for president again.

This probably comes as no surprise to anyone who witnessed the last five and a half years. However, to preempt his possible run with a special counsel investigation is prima facie evidence of conspiracy to commit and direct tampering with an election. (from onset)

The rub here, according to Democrats’ thinking, or their excuses for this plan, is that it will be presented as a perfectly independent process — i.e. removed from politics, Biden, or his justice department and AG Garland. But nothing could be further from the truth.

So this is what the Democrats have planned: basically doing what they did via Hillary’s campaign in 2016 all over again. As if they have not investigated Donald Trump enough, or sicced enough rabid dogs on him to this point. One more time around the old Edsel.

But they want to hide behind the false claim that it is independent and therefore legit. How quaint. I also think it is no surprise that they are openly planning and publicly admitting it. Of course it is meant to influence his decision and ability to run. Duh.

Are we right back to ‘Plan A’ again? This time they are telegraphing their plans.

How’s that for “democracy?” — Now it dies in broad daylight.

---

Flashback: I like how Leftists idea to ‘save democracy’ was over 500 riots in 2020, and burning cities with over a billion in damages. What’s to save us from democracy riots?

Not to mention the violence, crime, looting and anti-police agenda = “saving democracy!”

Right Ring | Bullright | 2022

Heartbreak Hotel

Back in the mid-50’s, Elvis Presley scored a big hit with Heartbreak Hotel. What a song. But this is not about Elvis’s legacy, it is about our country’s. I know, the Eagles also had one about Hotel California where, “You can checkout anytime you like but you can never leave.” But I wonder if America is turning turning into heartbreak hotel?

“Well, it’s down at the end of Lonely Street At Heartbreak Hotel.”

No, I don’t suggest songs are prophetic or particularly relevant except that the vision seems to fit in some cases. Purely by coincidence of course, unless you are talking about literature and Orwell’s 1984. Then it probably hits much closer to home.

Anyway, what do you call it when a president or a political party attacks the economy, energy, history, schools, the country and our justice system (and the people) all at the same time? What do we have?

Put it this way, I’m concerned but I don’t see the solution in elections. I mean haven’t we learned that only goes so far? And that just sets the cycle going from election to election, and getting much the same results.

So I start wondering now and then if we can overcome all the obstacles and this agenda? Is it possible or is it fools gold? How many times can you get up expectations only to have the wind blow them all away? And I’m not recommending a no way out mindset. We still must have hope. They cannot kill that off.

However, when things look grim as they often do, it does start feeling like we are in a heartbreak hotel but with little other options. It is all bound to break your heart seeing this mostly intentional damage inflicted on the country. And as I said, with all these parts of the US being attacked at once, how do you defend the turf?

The Democrats’ rhetoric is anchored to the past while they systematically destroy our hopeful future. Not by accident. Ever feel like you’re living in an experiment gone wrong?

Take this example: I get a campaign flier from a judicial candidate. No party is mentioned but a quick scan reveals the words “justice not handcuffs,” in quotes like here. Wait, could it be a candidate attacking those radical “reform” concepts? No, sure enough it was another activist, leftist candidate running on that theme. This time a judicial one. The same rhetoric as radical DA’s use.

I previously looked into some of the radicals’ policies and code words pop out like a teen frat party. One of them is called diversion policies. You know: diversion programs, mainly for youth but not exclusively for them, which divert justice or consequences for crime under the guise of rehabilitation. The idea is to keep criminals’ records clean because of the “stigma” contained in conviction from the justice system. No record, no stigma. It’s the “system” that stigmatizes criminals — not what they’ve done.

So I read this stuff they put out as if it makes the case for the programs, when it doesn’t. Yet they are pushing this stuff on us like it has great results. It doesn’t. Sure, they make their case but lacking in it is any sense of accountability or empathy for real victims. Yet it is interesting seeing them put this forward as some kind of solution to the problems they are creating. It’s dangerous.

But how many people fall for this propaganda of the Left? That scares me as much as the programs. Another thing I notice with these radicals is that these programs have long legs. They just keep creating more of them regardless of whether they work. What can you do about them? Can elections fix this?

Even if you get candidates elected, the tentacles of these programs are still there, after radicals are evicted, contaminating the entire system. How do you keep up with current work loads while trying to restore the system? What are real the odds of success?

The idea is not to let these radicals into office in the first place. That’s good if you can. But it may be a little late, if they already are in various places. I only offer my area as an example. If they are pushing radicalism here, then they are doing it everywhere. It will be the demise of society. They don’t care because that is what they want, as long as it leaves them in political control when all the SHTF.

But there is no accountability for either the policies or crime it produces and encourages. Then we are back to wondering if the country can survive this onslaught of attacks or what it will be like in the end? Or are we already doomed to a Heartbreak Hotel scenario?

Only those that truly care about the country are disturbed by it.

Right Ring | Bullright | 2022

Essence of 1984

The Left always lectures us, when challenged, that context matters. So there is one page in George Orwell’s 1984 that brings it all together, so nicely.  Of course what makes it more poignant to us now are the parallels we see around us.

 

1984

“Sometimes he talked to her of the Records Department and the impudent forgeries that he committed there. Such things did not appear to horrify her. She did not feel the abyss opening beneath her feet at the thought of lies becoming truths. He told her the story of Jones, Aaronson, and Rutherford and the momentous slip of paper which he had once held between his fingers. It did not make much impression on her. At first, indeed, she failed to grasp the point of the story.

‘Were they friends of yours?’ she said.

‘No, I never knew them. They were Inner Party members. Besides, they were far older men than I was. They belonged to the old days, before the Revolution. I barely knew them by sight.’

‘Then what was there to worry about? People are being killed off all the time, aren’t they?’

He tried to make her understand. ‘This was an exceptional case. It wasn’t just a question of somebody being killed. Do you realize that the past, starting from yesterday, has been actually abolished? If it survives anywhere, it’s in a few solid objects with no words attached to them, like that lump of glass there. Already we know almost literally nothing about the Revolution and the years before the Revolution. Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book has been rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street and building has been renamed, every date has been altered. And that process is continuing day by day and minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Party is always right. I know, of course, that the past is falsified, but it would never be possible for me to prove it, even when I did the falsification myself. After the thing is done, no evidence ever remains. The only evidence is inside my own mind, and I don’t know with any certainty that any other human being shares my memories. Just in that one instance, in my whole life, I did possess actual concrete evidence after the event — years after it.’

‘And what good was that?’

‘It was no good, because I threw it away a few minutes later. But if the same thing happened today, I should keep it.’

‘Well, I wouldn’t!’ said Julia. ‘I’m quite ready to take risks, but only for something worth while, not for bits of old newspaper. What could you have done with it even if you had kept it?’

‘Not much, perhaps. But it was evidence. It might have planted a few doubts here and there, supposing that I’d dared to show it to anybody. I don’t imagine that we can alter anything in our own lifetime. But one can imagine little knots of resistance springing up here and there — small groups of people banding themselves together, and gradually growing, and even leaving a few records behind, so that the next generations can carry on where we leave off.’

‘I’m not interested in the next generation, dear. I’m interested in us.

‘You’re only a rebel from the waist downwards,’ he told her. ” [pg 195-196]

It all starts to sound so eerily familiar. Listen to Julia…. echoes. But when he imagines small groups of resistance banding together, growing you have to think of the very purging and silencing operations carried out now to prevent just that sort of thing from happening – let alone taking root. Are we living fiction?

[Page 197]

“In a way, the world-view of the Party imposed itself
most successfully on people incapable of understanding it.
They could be made to accept the most flagrant violations
of reality, because they never fully grasped the enormity
of what was demanded of them, and were not sufficiently
interested in public events to notice what was happening.
By lack of understanding they remained sane.” …../

 

“Who controls the past controls the future:
who controls the present controls the past,”

Don’t Rock The Woke Boat, Simple Simon Says

The condition of the country and world today, as it is not as we wish it to were, would normally be a great time for evangelizing. That seems like the way it always worked. We called them awakenings, revivals, or God moments.

People do need hope, faith that there is something bigger than the potpourri of devastation we see around us while the country disintegrates from that shiny city on a hill. All is not lost, God is still on His throne and nothing these people do will change that. He is in the capital Pronoun business. That is the message all right.

So if ever there was an appropriate time and need for a message, this would seem to be it. Except for one thing. Where are the people to spread it? I don’t mean just a few or handful of evangelicals telling the great salvation story. Don’t get me wrong, God can work in a few and look what disciples did once they got the hang of it.

But when I look at what many mainline churches are doing, I shake my head. No, this is not a critique of churches……. or is it? I’m not really sure, but the more I see the more I see at least some churches as part of the problem. That hurts me. It bothers me and it makes me feel uncomfortable about some fellow Christians and about the future. No, I don’t want to complain too much here. Wouldn’t be prudent, you know, or productive.

Then maybe that is what is needed? I mean every quadrant of society takes criticism from different sides these days. It is open season on the right folks or groups. Should churches be exempt from criticism? I know people probably don’t want to hear it. After all, churches are supposed to be part of the solution, and they often are, not the problem.

But the same age-old story you would get if you really broaden the scope to look at everything objectively (without inherent biases which seems harder and harder), then you cannot ignore the one stunning thing staring you in the face that does not go away.

That is, as bad as times are for culture and the rest in civil society, it screams to what is responsible for it. You have to admit if churches were doing a better job, then how could things be this bad? That would seem impossible if churches were very effective. So you must draw the conclusion that part of the blame is on the churches. Yes it is people themselves but the church is an organ of God that should stand up for and be doing something. No, this is not about church building for me. It is about being effective.

See if we all must take some of the blame for the way society is — or the country by extension — then churches cannot escape their share of blame either. I believe people are responsible for allowing much of this to happen. We can claim to be victims of it all but we allow it, even if we do not condone it outright. But churches are in that mix, too.

I know, it is an issue/story many people don’t want to hear, aren’t interested in, or don’t care about. I get that. But who can stand up for churches to defend them from blame? I don’t know who can make that case? Maybe I am doing the easy thing by throwing some criticism their way — rather than attempting to defend them.

Sure churches have missions and they do a lot of good. But that is not what I am talking about. When do we start, as people, taking responsibility for the society we live in? And where is the effort to change and fix it? Maybe this is all a cultural indictment and not about the individual. We like to hide behind the individual responsibility thing. But if things are the way they are, what does that say about us all as individuals?

I don’t mean this as a rant, just being serious because we know there are serious consequences to it all. We know that much. Just look at the way Democrats downplay or parse abortion. (most of those politicians) They claim they are personally not for abortions themselves, but they completely endorse having as many as society can provide, even demanding our government pay for it. Abortions on every corner, without limits. Does it make sense? There is a layer of excusing themselves in all that .

Like oh, I don’t personally rob banks or assault people but I will not stand in the way of anyone who does. “It’s their thing.” I don’t light fires, riot and burn down buildings when I am mad at government but I will not condemn the “love summer” of riots, political violence and crime. ‘It’s sometimes necessary.‘ So they stood there and watched cities burn and said nothing about it. They donated to the no bail or arrest cause for those that did it. ‘No, I don’t believe in it but I don’t believe in accountability for it either.’

Only a few classic examples. Where are the churches in all this? Or where are the churches when innocent people are being spied on or targeted for their religious and political beliefs, or for who they voted for? When forced to take a gov’t shot or pill or  else lose their job?  Oh, that’s where they would claim “but separation of church and state.” So we are to stand by to allow this weaponization against people of faith and do nothing?

It is a selective thing to churches as it is to the rest of society. They choose their fights when it is for ‘poor immigrants’ or downtrodden. When it is for standing up for illegals flooding the country through open borders, they are right there with their compassion buckets. But when it is our own citizens being discriminated against or attacked for their faith, they are silent. Show me a left-wing issue like climate change and they are on it.

How is it they can break barriers of a phony “separation” when they feel like it and it’s welcomed by society, too? But if churches stand up for people’s personal belief and faith, that is not acceptable to defend. We have become very accustomed where those lines are,  where they intersect and contradict each other. We accept it. What can we do about it?

So those ‘good’ folks can have charities, organizations, marches and fundraisers to help illegal aliens who broke the country’s laws to get here; but when it comes to those here that need help in hard times, they fall through the cracks. People who are not intentionally and knowingly breaking the law do not make the priority cut. Sorry, just not enough compassion in our tanks for that; but show some more love for illegals. Get with it.

Do you think churches deserve some of the blame for the way things are going? I’m really curious. I don’t see anyone who has made a great defense for the status quo. Am I being a little too hard on blaming Christians and churches? Maybe. But aren’t we supposed to be the salt, not the wine-chaser for everything the world concocts?

Could it be that some of these churches are doing this selective advocacy (I’ll call it) for a reason? Maybe it’s  to keep the finger of blame from pointing at them, by pandering to the world and the woke in one stroke? Just a question. That’s all and I fear that is enough.

 

In Critical Defense:

Someone may say I just want to politicize churches in general, because that’s what liberals always do and say. No, churches have already politicized themselves more than anyone cares to admit. It’s been done. They also follow the lead of some corporations.

And I never said all churches but I don’t have a number. True, some aren’t in that camp.

But for other mainline ones, they advocate political issues much the way some corporations have. So they gladly take positions on gun control, climate change, critical race theory, revising history, BLM, abortion, biological debates, border control, illegal immigration, LGBTQ advocacy, demonstrations, civil disobedience resistance, on crime, police and bail defunding issues, social justice activism, even some union policies.

They also incentivize illegal immigration through their advocacy.
Why does that almost feel sort of like Luther with a list of Theses?

That is to say basically all the hot button issues or controversial ones you commonly hear about. Green and environmental as well, And many of those in official capacities, in missions or raising money. They participate in marches, protests and sometimes have political leaders speak on them. All those are highly politicized issues. So yeah, they’ve become political. But no one points out those contradictions. Strange about that.

(So keep the pews warm… and I’ll leave a light on for you).

Right Ring | Bullright | 2022

Joe’s 15 Minutes of Fame and Pain

With half the collective cognitive ability of an anthill, Joe Biden takes to the South Lawn for a pre-planned rally to celebrate inflation, while the market was tanking in real time – going south faster than Joe. It dropped 1200 points by the time he spoke.

‘Titanic move over, I’ve got a better band,’
It was better than an ice cream festival, for Lyin’ Biden.

After all, Joey didn’t have to explain anything. He had famous singer, songwriter James Taylor to do the interpretive messaging for him. Biden wanted to hear that favorite song, fire and rain. “I’ve seen fire and I’ve seen rain. I’ve seen sunny days I thought would never end…” Except that it is a song about suicide, pain and addiction.

I know, with the lyrics fire and rain, Joe was thinking climate change and to change the message from the creeping inflation. But Biden’s economy is lying in pieces on the ground, with our “sweet dreams” and lives hanging in the balance.

So I took the liberty to rework the lyrics a little — aka Corny Pop style.

I seen anger and I seen pain,
I seen James try to put us in shame.

And I hope to never see that again,
From my rooftop or my poop-drop.

But our time may be at hand,
If we don’t oppose their plans and take a stand.

“Lord knows when the cold wind blows it’ll turn your head around.”

 

This reminds me that those valiant musicians are always my go to sources for politics and influence, or as the left believes. Them and celebrities have the best political advice.

‘Cause I know damn well musicians got their finger right on the pulse of the people and  important problems in America. Maybe I’ll write a song about that. Cheers to those preening, musical Nostradumasses! Hats off to you.

The T-card: violence, riots and terrorism

Let’s go back to the 2020 election and talk about something the media or journalists never mention, ignore and paid no attention to then.

Oh what critical thing was that? The thousands of businesses that had to board up their stores and shops in anticipation of the results of the election. That is: if Democrats did not get what they wanted, or didn’t get their way there would be hell to pay.

If Democrats did not win, there would be riots across the country destroying businesses and violence in the streets. Everyone knew it. Businesses prepared accordingly, as best they could. We all knew it was coming. Democrats were not going to accept the results like they didn’t in 2016. This time they were fully prepared. They were dug in.

Hotels were rented and plans were made. It was in process. If Trump won there would be hell in the streets. Many vowed to be ungovernable.

Don’t you think on some level that visual of violence made an impact on the election? It is terrorism after all, I called it Urban Terrorism. Even Kamala Harris said they aren’t going to stop and they should not stop. No one was being held to account either in over 550 riots they had, with billions in damages already inflicted.

The writing was on the wall that was our fate in cities and towns across America. Democrats were going to be in full-blown revolt. It would be ugly. Of course it would continue right through Inauguration Day. They would have protested the results and certification of the election. And it was all justifiable, according to Democrats and media. They would go scorched earth with no end in sight.

So do Democrats have anything at all to complain about? Do they have any grounds to accuse anyone — certainly of violence?

But it was all in process before election day. How many voters were intimidated, or just scared, by the Left’s terrorism? How could that not have an impact on the election? No one was going to jail either, there was no accountability for billions in damages inflicted.

Influencing elections and outcomes and “saving democracy?” Don’t be ridiculous.

CBS reports now:

“President Biden will host a White House summit next month aimed at combating a spate of hate-fueled violence in the U.S., as he works to deliver on his campaign pledge to “heal the soul of the nation.”

The White House announced Friday that Mr. Biden will host the United We Stand Summit on Sept. 15, highlighting the “corrosive effects” of violence on public safety and democracy.”

Biden said in Rockville Maryland 8/25/2022:

“Trump and the extreme MAGA Republicans have made their choice: to go backwards, full of anger, violence, hate, and division.

But we’ve chosen a different path: forward, the future, unity, hope, and optimism. I mean it sincerely. We choose to build a better America.” …./

“And the whole notion of the “burn it all down” politics of MAGA Republicans continues to be a drumbeat. “

“Burn it all down,” really, considering what they did in 2020? What revision.
Biden added:

“What we’re seeing now is the beginning or the death knell of an extreme MAGA philosophy. It’s not just Trump, it’s the the entire philosophy that underpins the – I’m going to say something – it’s like semi-fascism.”

I’m going to say something,… Projection! He’s had a little too much Corn Pop.

Right Ring | Bullright | 2022

Age Of Diversions: how scandal is done

Against all obvious risks, the apparatus of DOJ decided to create a Biden scandal by raiding Mar-a-Lago, as a diversion for the Afghanistan pullout anniversary. An act which cost him much of the support he had from the lost in space crowd.

This was the plan.

Do it when Congress goes out of session and when Biden is skipping off to vacation on an island — now there is a metaphor — so he can claim some physical separation with what is really happening. Just as Obama always heard about stuff later in media, like us, and claimed plausible deniability. And like Obama wanted a third term to be behind the scenes calling the shots and running government.

Obama: Stick with me now, Joe, you can do this. It will create a diversion from Afghanistan. Dems and media love a raid. Then roll it into midterms.

Joe, then you can always do a college loan bailout. Trust me, Afghanistan when your approval tanked is old news in the rear view mirror. They won’t even realize it. It’s your comeback, kid! Keep talking about Trump.

Even you can’t fuck this up, Joe. People love seeing FBI raids on their enemies more than grieving 13 dead anonymous Americans in a place they know nothing about. Sheesh. Give them an August to remember and light that fire for the midterms. Kill some sacred babies, Joe. You can handle this. Sure it’s political, so what? Who cares? They want heads, give them heads.

Biden: so Garland is in the loop on this?

Obama: Man, he is the loop. Why do you think I nominated him to SCOTUS? It’s great, it also covers up those anti-cop, Soros policies. We all love Fed’s and law enforcement now, don’t we? Wray will do anything for you if you give him some support back. Who doesn’t like an investigation? It’s not a scandal, it’s Joementum.  And don’t forget the fundraiser, Joe! ~

---

Right Ring | Bullright | 2022

Tales Of Two Anniversaries

The US is in the immediate anniversary of the Afghanistan pull out which bequeathed us the worst national foreign policy failure in modern time. History will not be kind

It’s been a year and we still don’t yet know all the ramifications. But it is as scandalous as anything else Biden has done since taking office. What else could we expect from America’s first Geriatric President? If you can count the lies in this one, you deserve a medal. We sort of know what happened but haven’t digested it, if we ever will.

But aside from that we are coming up on 9/11, which is the big one. Not only the original 9/11 but it is also the 10th anniversary of the Benghazi attack on 9-11-2012. That one showed the inside failure of Obama and his administration in foreign policy. How long did they play the denial of that attack on a loop? Lies, coverups, it had it all.

In turn, Beghazi 9/11 is what led into the Hillary email scandal. It particularly showed the incestuous connection with media, Democrats and power like nothing else.

Except it will be only the much later Jan 6th anniversary that the left and media will care about. They sure as hell don’t care about Benghazi. And anything pointing back at Hillary Clinton is just bad juju for the Left. Avoid that at all costs.

Come to think of it, there are a lot of anniversaries around the Left. It is a smorgasbord, they just don’t like being reminded of them. There is the anniversary of Obamacare, the anniversary of the Iran deal with pallets of cash, for just a few. But recently we have “summer of love 2020” and those 550 riots across the country. Plenty of celebration there.

And Democrats always loved to memorialize the Roe Wade anniversary with lots of pomp and circumstance. I guess we ruined that one though they still have many others.

But this year, can we finally give the Benghazi anniversary the importance it deserves? Brought to you by the same people who gave us the Afghanistan pull out.

 

Right Ring | Bullright | 2022

Don’t Look Now, PA Doing It Again: early bird call.

Okay, so there is still time before midterm elections and this is only speculation based on some early polls. It looks like the PA goose is cooked. I’ll make the call, hope I’m wrong.

Pennsylvania appears poised to elect ‘Feta-cheese Al Creepo’ as the new, most prominent socialist and Marxist/commie in the Senate. (or Socialist El Capo, if you prefer)  Congratulations PA, the jokes on you. You will be stuck with Fetterman and Casey.

Sadly so will the country be, to some extent. Seems PA just cannot say no to him.

Five Thirty-Eight has him up by 11 points over Dr Oz.
A Survey Monkey poll has Fetterman at 47% and Oz at 30%.
Even BuzzFeed says Fetterman is having fun trolling his way to a Senate seat.
(this is all after Fetterman had a stroke, with limited campaigning)

Now I know, don’t believe and rely on the polls! But there is the 2020 election where PA went for Biden. Just the fact Fetterman is up by that much in polls should be alarming. We know what he is, all that remains is to haggle the price. (as they say) Never had a real job, yet he’s a died in the wool socialist — at best. Commie is far more accurate.

We saw the direction PA went in 2020, notwithstanding disputes. But no relief.

Fetterman is running to the left of Bernie, and probably a lot more militant. Once in, they will not be able to force him out. So I’d say PA is gone to the dark side. It really is a shame. From such high hopes to no hope.

I lost most of any confidence I had in PA back in 2020. It showed America who they were. Only now, they are going to try to blame Trump, his supporters or some other force for losing and electing Fetterman. But no, it is PA that did this, just like it was in 2020.

Don’t blame Republicans for your loss in PA. It is not Dr Mehmet Oz or Trump’s fault. Dr Oz made some minor strategic errors, which is expected. But Fetterman?

And by the way, Republicans need to make a new ’24 roadmap that does not include PA because that is just reality. We can’t depend on them. Once your state goes for someone like Fetterman, well, game over. Nothing good will ever come of that.

It really irritates me to say it but that is my hunch. I do hope I am wrong in the end. But my confidence in PA left the station in 2020 and there is no return trip scheduled.

Newt Gingrich chimed in that he was born in PA, with family still in central PA. He knows Pennsylvania, and says they would never go for a radical socialist like Fetterman.

Well, I am not so confident as he seems to be that they will stop or prevent it. There are a few reasons for that which I’ll keep to myself. I would love to be proved wrong.

 

Right Ring | Bullright | 2022

The Woke Goes For Broke

I write this not to have some fun with words, and see how creative I can be. I do it to at least try to make some formative point hopefully anchored to national traditions and values. It gets hard sometimes — words being what they are.

But what frustrates me is that in doing so, it cannot come up to the level of this current reality. Maybe in some ironic way one can only do that through fiction because the truth is too scary to even imagine. Truth and reality go beyond what can be accepted, easily.

A weird thing happened when Trey Gowdy delivered his weekly monologue once again talking about prosecution and Lady Justice wearing her proverbial blindfold. Trey being the great proponent for prosecution(sigh), his grievance list did not even include Benghazi. No, newsflash: ‘Lady-J’ is now woke and she is not wearing any blindfold. She sorely resents the day she ever did. That’s what we have here: outright rebellion against American concepts, certainly justice.

Lady-J is swinging loose and doesn’t mind showing you who she endorses, or whom she doesn’t. She has predispositions now and doesn’t mind you knowing it. She’s a postmodern form of whatever. It is all only relevant to wishes and desires — not yours particularly but of some woke mob who gets to decide what justice is, or is not. And she’s pretty much told us, through parlayed actions of the left, that she is not moored to any traditional justice you learned was fair and just. She has “moved on!”

She has busted a move and she’s not looking back.

All this recoil and flailing about on news networks of the left, or among leftist minions, is only their way of telling us that’s the way it is. Mother’s little helpers they are, telling us “there is a new mother nature taking over”, and it is them. [1] It’s woke and sure not blind.

Never mind if any others might attempt to take control because the freaks of injustice have a pretty possessive hold on it all. Dare you to try.

Who knew justice would be a fatal shot of a full frontal assault on the US? Something we so long took for granted, not for the outcome it always delivered but for the aspirational virtue we held in it. Crush that and you crush the hopes and dreams of the people. If you have nothing to defend you, then what is all the struggling about? Why not just succumb to tyranny? Might as well. That’s probably the plan anyway.

The whole country was founded on aspirational freedom and justice that, while not perfect, was as securely held as anything in the world. It was not guaranteed to always deliver the correct outcome, but the process itself had checks and guards to keep it fair. You might have to make Lady Justice work a bit, but the hope was to make it work.

Talk to an attorney sometime and a value will surface. They claim that they can at least make the system work. Maybe they cannot guarantee outcome but they can make the process do its diligence. Exhaust the options. Now that is even out the window.

We hear talk of amendments or bill of rights only to eventually realize there is no guarantee anymore. If nothing stands in the way of tyrants — be they party apparatchiks or court officials — trampling on your sacred God-given rights, then for their purposes you have none. They don’t care if they are violating a higher authority. They are the only ensconced power as far as they are concerned. And they have no one to answer to for it, which is even worse. It can all go as far or fast as they want to roll this thing.

To hear the Left use terms like social justice, I often think to myself: just what is it they mean by that term? Is it some social contract they think is a force around the world? Is it a form of voodoo or mysticism? Why do they want to substitute that, whatever it is, for justice based on rule of law? Don’t they believe in the rule of law anymore?

The sad answer is no. But if we don’t have a hope of justice, we are in deep doo-doo. They’ve shown us, in reality, what it means not to have real justice. The message could not be louder. The rabid Left’s response to any complaints is “get used to it.”

But it also doesn’t much care if you like it or not. Lady-J ain’t blind anymore and she is just as radical as Leftists are, or want to be. And stop calling her a she!

 

---

*[1]I did not originate those phrases – vague song lyric references.
Mother’s little helpers — cultural drug reference, ’66 Rolling Stones song
“New mother nature takin’ over“– lyric The Guess Who, “No Sugar Tonight / New Mother Nature”

 

Right Ring | Bullright | 2022