Free Speech Or Risky Speech?

How would you like it if there were a committee of people assembled in your town who got to decide whether or not you have free speech to participate in the public square? Or if you will be banned from access to the same resources everyone else communicates with?

Well, that is what Facebook is rolling out over whether Trump has free speech and access to the public square or not? Of course, in this case they decided that no, in fact, he does not. He shall remain banned and shunned like a leper, well, at least for six more months. What happens then? Maybe their “high Committee” will gather for another verdict.

If any of it sounds absurd, it should. What if you were treated the same way? All it takes is them declaring you a risk and unpalatable. Supposedly Zuckerberg went to the trouble of having this so-called independent committee decide Trump’s fate. But essentially, it could be our fate as well, and will be, since we can all be given the same ostracized treatment.

It comes down to their verdict of whether one’s speech is free speech or risky speech, or if their empowered committee cancels your participation rights or not? But never tell these arrogant lords of social media that their own right to exist or function is contingent on approval of some “mob” or “committee” — either one amounts to the same thing.

In the end, anything that may be a risk or threat to their power is branded an intolerable risk that cannot be allowed, because it  threatens their habitat and power. Isn’t that what this is all about, their habitat and its preservation? They get to decide who is allowed into their ever-expansive habitat and who is not. But then they don’t live buy their own rules, yet they hold the cancel button for everyone else in their hands.

In this hierarchy, there are no appeals or other arbiters, all decisions and cancellations are final. If the mob decides you should be deleted, you are. They control town square and those in it. Who made big-tech kings? I thought America did not accept such royalty.

Josh Hawley gave us a preview even before his book comes out. And now that it is coming out, despite their cancel attempts, the Left are even more enraged than before.

What else is new, we have a president whose Justice Department is targeting his political opponents. Rudy Giuliani is raided like some criminal. Notice how days after news came out about John Kerry collaborating and sharing classified intelligence with the Iranians, it is suddenly time to round up Rudy. Great diversion and defensive tactics. Do you think we’ll ever see John Kerry rounded up and raided for what he was doing for four years? Nah. Have you ever thought such things were possible in America?

That is the problem, it doesn’t feel like America with these things happening. This is not democracy or America; it is anti-American. And part of the country wants it that way.

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2021

Downstream Politics, Upstream Revolution

As an aside admission, for years I did not take seriously enough that politics was downstream from culture. But I see how important that is.

I underestimated the connection between the two. Ignorance is no excuse.

You know, Democrats over the years criticized the right any time it stood up on cultural issues. They would say anything to get us to ignore culture. Not to say it worked; you can’t ignore it. But they knew culture is upstream from politics. So if you can change the culture then you change politics.

No wonder they wanted to fool us into ceding ground to the culture. If the Cultural Revolution is raging, the worst thing you can do is not show up – or dismiss it entirely. Some Republicans have yet to learn that while all the Democrats delve into it like the mother’s milk.

Forfeiting that ground is a huge error of omission in the war. Democrats seem to have a knack for running that cultural warfare. Not leading it but running out in front of every issue. We often just sigh and turn away.

But we cannot afford to do that. We must embrace the cultural battle if we want to win this war for the country. It may not be easy, but losing the country is tougher to handle. Losing both politics and the country in the end is devastating.

So the sage advice is to engage it or lose it. As I said at the top, I am guilty for not paying enough attention to the premise behind it. I am convinced Democrats understand that if they can change the culture, they can change the country. And naturally, the political advantage goes with it.

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2021

EO Methods And Madness

Warning to conservatives: this gem is only a big story to those of us who do have a moral conscience in tact. For media and all others unrestrained by those boundaries, it is just a non-story not worth reporting. I grade it a 10 on that basis.

I hope you check out the whole article to see what the sinister Biden administration is cooking up. After a previous post on rights, this is the natural follow up.

American Thinker

“Executive Order Canceling the Constitution”

By Leo Goldstein | April 20, 2021

“On April 15, Preident Biden signed an Executive Order on Blocking Property with Respect to Specified Harmful Foreign Activities of the Government of the Russian Federation. Contrary to its title, this EO is not about Russia. It is designed to allow the Biden administration to deprive American citizens and organizations of their rights and property by arbitrarily linking those persons to real, imagined, or vaguely defined activities of the Russian government.

The Biden administration unilaterally makes the determination and requires neither criminal acts nor intent. The punishment is blocking assets and a prohibition on any dealing with the accused person. Spouses and adult children of individuals found guilty by accusation under this EO are punished, too.

The EO was preceded by some distracting maneuvers, both diplomatic (hostile rhetoric toward Russia) and military (sending naval ships toward the Black Sea and recalling them back, as if dealing with Russian threats). Thus, many people assumed that the EO was directed at Russia, and completely missed the fact that it is directed at dissent here, at home.

Over the past four years, the Democrat Party, Fake News, and Big Tech have been frequently portraying their opponents as Russian trolls or Russian misinformation operators. The Russian collusion narrative, initially invented to overthrow the Trump administration, has been used to smear many conservative movements. Now this effort has been crowned by an Executive Order.”…/

“The Biden administration can define “malicious activities,” “democratic processes or institutions,” and the activities that undermine them as it wants.”

Continue reading at American Thinker

This lays out the cold-blooded strategy to unleash it on Americans. Though many will be unaware of it, since media does not report the news that concerns people.

This is one wicked order.

The fact that they thought it all out, even borrowing words from an old Bush EO, shows how they plan on using it domestically on people. More importantly, how they can employ it against political opponents at will.

But they have experimented with using accusations of Russian collaboration for years, even before Trump. This only enshrines and codifies that process into fiat law.

As I read through it, thinking of various applications, it seems to empower certain areas in our government. They would be in Treasury, Justice, and our intelligence apparatus. Eerily similar to how they used those last organs in 2016. Now they appear to make official those same type methods. Its use will probably not be front page news.

It Is Not A Design Failure

What we learned in the last year is how quickly the whole thing can go down. And that all it really takes is a few aligned contributing factors. Our enemies have been plotting for decades what we now are doing and allowing ourselves.

Despite all the talk, this is not about race relations in America. It is about relations, but about the relationship between the people and the government.

Cue the Declaration of Independence:

“We hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all Men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of happiness—That to secure these Rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the Consent of the Governed….”

The important part for this purpose is Governments are instituted to secure these rights. But what happens when Government is no longer interested in securing our rights, for whatever reasons, or has other more important priorities instead?

Things go downhill fast.

We can get to the point where Government (if you can call it that) refuses to do anything to protect the safety and security of the people. In fact, it could get to where its entire agenda is to not protect  the people and ignore the will of the people. Imagine that? Right, we don’t have to because we are just about there.

That sort of knocks the legs out from under any real justice. But isn’t that what we have? Only it is not a matter of race. We will all be punished when it cannot manage real justice. Things go downhill from there. There are enough people now who don’t want justice and don’t care. But I wouldn’t trust any polls on that. And you know that based on what they do want, what they say and their agenda. It doesn’t matter if they scream about it and democracy. They want neither. Their objective seems to be no justice for all.

So where does a country go when that all happens? I can tell you it is a horrible place. Earlier in life, I had thought there was no chance of this scenario as long as some people would not allow it. Well, guess what?

I don’t like being wrong but I was. It can happen despite all that. The funny part is I don’t think Government will be too happy about the results in the end either.

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2021

Seek Justice Reap Peace

The motto ought to be to ‘seek justice and reap peace.’ But when we do not reap peace, there is a problem. When we do not reap both justice and peace, there is conflict.

But often even when we seek justice we do not reap peace, when there is conflict, strife, violence and unrest instead; then we look for accountability for all of it and find none at all. That really needs to be addressed.

So we get a guilty verdict on all counts that may validate the process, however, it does not justify or validate all the violence and destruction in the name of some “social justice”. Those acts too must stand accountable for what they are. Violence and urban terrorism cannot be exempt from justice. We should not have a preference for violent unrest.

But we see over and over those acts go on unchallenged and unaccounted for. They just are. Wrong becomes right and right becomes wrong. We cannot tolerate constant random violence under any name. It must be held to account. It cannot be dismissed just because we get a verdict we agree with afterward. The end does not justify those means.

The black community is not alone in seeking justice. When most of the country does not feel confident there will be justice, it sows a seed of distrust. That goes for black, brown, white or any other. But the violence we see repeatedly in the streets is not a replacement for justice. Mob rule is no suitable replacement for democracy and the rule of law either.

Again, how about a piece of justice for all?

Stop acting as if any violence is condoned if we don’t get our way.

The lies will roll on in the media, who obviously are not seeking justice either.
And we are all reaping what they are sowing.

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2021

The First And Last Responders

I apologize in advance for the rant but it cannot be helped, it is necessary. I have two main points if I can make them adequately. Words and language have their own limitations.

I am sick and tired of the attitude of some leaders on the right – well-intentioned as they may be. Stop treating this like it is all some unavoidable accident. All this is not a mistake. It is an intentional agenda.

We cannot act like it is an incompetence problem when radical leftists want to impose these circumstances on us. It is not fate or coincidence.

What we are witnessing is the fabric of the country being torn apart in a radical rage but they are fully aware in what they do. That is the entire point of it. So top treating it like a series of mistakes. You know, the border, the defunding police, the green new deal, court packing, surveillance, all kinds of control. It is a sustained, systematic, targeted attempt to destroy the fabric of the country, what holds it together.

 

Something else: they are trying to ignite a race war in the country. Let’s be clear about that too. They are part way there already. Maybe we cannot stop what they are hell-bent on inciting. Oh, but that too is intentional.

It makes me livid watching people like Lindsey Graham or others act as if this were all by horrible mistake. Face it. Call it out for what it is. Tell everyone what they are intentionally doing. Confront them on intentions. Let’s not kid ourselves about phony objectives.

Don’t be reluctant using criticism of their decision-making or faulty positions on issues. Can’t we all hear the silence on the left about these “problems” or the chaos that follows? This is their agenda.

 

It is not misplacing or misappropriating power, it is the abuse of it. But they know what they are doing. It is not a matter of informing them of the problems. They are the problem. So stop kidding people about the objectives when they are very clear.

We know we are in a pickle, we know why. It is because the left will refuse course correction because they will not change their radical direction. It is not a matter of pressure on them either.

So stop with the accident treatment. Stop just screaming at the arsonist to put down the flame thrower. Who should we call? There is no 911 to call, no sheriff, no courts will answer the call. Even the Supreme Court refuses to respond. No one is coming to our aid; no one is going to stop or prevent it all. No one is coming to the rescue.

We the people are on our own. It’s all up to us now.

We are the only responders, And that’s all there is. We’re it.

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2021

Would’ve Could’ve Should’ve

The former president known as Barack H. Obama, or alias Barry Soetoro, wasted no time in penning and speaking his thoughts after the Boulder, CO shooting on Monday. Just as if it was the opportunity he was waiting for, he erupted on Tuesday. Gun control on tap.

NY Post

Obama on Boulder shooting: ‘Disaffection, racism and misogyny’ drive killings

Former President Barack Obama on Tuesday released a statement on the Boulder shooting saying recent killings are being driven by “disaffection, racism and misogyny” — despite Colorado officials identifying the gunman who slaughtered 10 inside a grocery store as a Syrian-born immigrant.

Obama linked mass shootings to discrimination in a message posted to Twitter calling for new gun control laws after the Boulder, Colo., shooting Monday and the murder of eight last week at massage parlors in the Atlanta area.

“It will take time to root out the disaffection, racism and misogyny that fuels so many of these senseless acts of violence. But we can make it harder for those with hate in their hearts to buy weapons of war,”

Well, we could have made it harder for people with a deep-seeded hatred for America in their hearts to ever become President. Obviously, we didn’t do that. We could have and should have. Lessons learned. Instead, here is Obama once again lecturing us.

“We can overcome opposition by cowardly politicians and the pressure of a gun lobby that opposes any limit on the ability of anyone to assemble an arsenal. We can, and we must. A once-in-a-century pandemic cannot be the only thing that slows mass shootings in this country.” – said Obama

Except  that runs contrary to the 2nd Amendment. And thank God.  SO does he propose changing the Constitution? Yes.

Where does the pandemic have any effect on mass shootings? They seem to have been taking place all along in Chicago. Weapons of war, as I interpret them, is any weapon used in the conduct of war. And in war, people are very creative about prosecuting it.

Instead, in Obama’s eyes, anyone who does not go to war with the Constitution is a coward. Not being radical is cowardly. Well we could have stopped that political threat in its tracks by not electing him. We should have. It would have also been the Constitutional thing to do.

Turns out it was a man from Syria, how coincidental to Obama’s cause?

Biden’s Invasion Of America

Welcome to Biden’s invasion of America through our southern border.

First of all, why does it matter what you call it? I don’t think it does. Everyone knows what it is. We say it is a crisis on the border but to the Left it is a plan, made to order. Why does their refusal to call it a crisis matter? The fact that they will not only reinforces it is a plan.

Terms don’t matter. That is just a debate of semantics. Why do we need them to call it a crisis anyway? We know what it is, a synchronized invasion.

Isn’t it amazing how the people who can go on world apology tours for the faults of America, can choreograph and facilitate a planned invasion of our country against the will of the people? It sort of shows what they think of America. If they don’t appreciate it and respect our borders, then why in the hell should foreigners from other countries?

Whatever Joe Biden or his propagandists say, take seriously the word of those coming. They say they were invited by Biden and told to come. So even when it became a crisis, his Homeland Misinformation minister said “you can still come, just don’t come right now.”

But what good does even that backhanded invitation do when Biden and company already told them over months to come? He telegraphed he would be doing something in his first 100 days. When Joe enticed them with his rhetoric and then put out the welcome mat, what did he expect would happen? That’s why it is a crisis only to us, but a plan to them.

Why does that matter? It is not an accident; these are not unforeseen circumstances. Technically, it is planned open borders policy unfolding. Some of the incoming are being released without even a court date. Remember when Biden argued at the debate that most illegal immigrants showed up for their court appearances? That was a big lie.

So what do they say when they are asked? They say and believe that Joe Biden said they could/should come. They believe the president will assist their desires. Is that not enough proof of conspiracy for what Biden is doing? He told them to surge the border. They did.

The real issue here is Joe and his administration are facilitating foreign groups, cartels, traffickers and drug runners in this open borders plan. He is collaborating, either directly or indirectly, with them. Then he is foisting the expense of it all on our country –our people. We are to pay for their medial treatment, and give them money. We are to transport them across our country.

He is not only aiding and abetting hostile groups to our country; he is orchestrating an invasion on our people. He is doing everything he can to facilitate it while doing almost nothing to prevent it. The security and protection of our people is part of the job. Joe is failing not only that but inflicting harm on the people. He is far worse than King George.

It would be an impeachable offense of the first order if one were facilitating an invasion of our country. And he is.

And he is obfuscating the laws of the country and opposing the will of the people. He is issuing decrees and fiat law to assist invaders. All aimed at the people. He is defying Congress, the Constitution and rule of law. It is treasonous.

But don’t stop there. He is frustrating the will of the people to do anything about it or prevent it. Then he tries to blame it on his predecessor and political opponents. But, in fact, his opponents were trying to prevent it and calling attention to border security — not denying it is a problem like Biden is doing.

Does it even matter what the purposes are? It is intentional; he is facilitating an invasion. It is a plan. Then he is undermining and making it hard as possible for border officers to do their jobs. In fact, he is preventing them from doing their job to protect our borders.

Then the administration issues orders not to provide information to press or media, not to give them statistics, to frustrate their ability to report on it.

So if he is capable of all this within only 6 weeks of taking office, what else is he capable of doing? How far will he go?  He is intentionally frustrating the will of the people to preserve our sovereignty as a country.

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2021

Plan A Rolling Into AA Nonstop

The Democrats plan is unfolding as of this minute, and the plot is becoming very clear to anyone following the script. As obvious as the clock is on the wall.

That is to ride out their authoritarian control over us, government and the economy using the rubric of COVID but then, when it fizzles out, to shift the same control (now expertise) over the country under another banner – think Climate Change and illegal invasion or any other suitable, created, self imposed crisis or cause du jour.

You don’t have to think hard on that one anymore, they made it clear: COVID is only a dress rehearsal. They always build on their failures. My guess is it will be bigger and more disastrous than even a pandemic was. Maybe a dual or trifecta purpose and cause celeb? So, in fact, this was only a trail run. Get ready for the “ripper and gripper” sequel.

Now that they got people conditioned and accustomed to hunkering down to make every personal sacrifice possible, even families, what is not possible to do to the country next?

Something Wicked this way comes.

But there can be no pause in between to allow return to some semblance of normalcy because there is no more normalcy. It is gone. That has already been demolished.

But sure, even in that scenario, there will still be some winners and losers. The power elite and political brokers will decide who those are too. Together with their new election schemes they see no limits. Why should they? Is there anyone there – or legal controlling authority — to stop or prevent them. They think not.

We aren’t just dealing with the loony Left and political power anymore; we are dealing with a cocktail of evil. Let’s dispel their major notion. science in not a significant factor in any of this. (it hasn’t been) Power and politics are everything. That defies science.

The only veto you have — maybe the only one you will ever get — is in not supporting the left in the midterms. People cried wolf before but now the wolf is telling us himself.

Oh, I don’t really want to believe what I just wrote but the rocks are crying out.

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2021

Throwing Down The Gauntlet

In most major stories there is usually the good guys and the bad guys. Sometimes it is hard to tell which is which. In the past, things were simpler where those lines seemed clearly drawn. Not so now.

Today it feels more muddled and not just in the movies, where Hollywood likes to push those limitations to the max. Even intentionally confusing.

This is especially the case today in law enforcement. But still if you really look at the facts and examine it, you can tell which is which. Those lines are furthered blurred when you cannot give the benefit of doubt to one side.

So its possible you can have the old good cop bad cop routine. You can also have a good cop doing something nefarious, which doesn’t make sense. You could have a bad cop trying to do something that appears righteous, using unconventional means. Or you could have the bad cop doing the same acts that corrupt the system.

You could have a good cop not doing what he needs to do intervening. A good cop could be prevented from doing what is the right thing. Restrictions could make the right thing impossible. You have all these different scenarios outside the normal boundaries of law enforcement. But you also have cops themselves making judgments on right or wrong, with a potential for error.

Why say all this and point out these nuances? Because they become possibilities when it is not obvious who the good guy is in a situation. So it can be, or seem to be, confusing. I think people like clearer lines.

Put on top of that that we usually don’t get those kind of mitigating or condemning factors from press reports. It looks confusing at first glance.

That confusion is where a lot of things can happen, like public perception or outrage or where narratives form. Good can seem bad and bad can seem good. Wrong can be replaced by righteous motive. Right can be clouded by appearance of conspiracy. Right can be condemned for the wrong reasons.

We are human and make these judgments based on what we see and what we know at the time — which often matters. Our judgments are not prefect either. The facts can make it hard to decipher who is right or wrong?

The same thing plays out in politics. Who is right or, if both are wrong, who has the higher ground? Granted these are complex judgments but we are capable of making them, as long as we have the facts and evidence. But when we don’t have those, it makes it almost impossible to make correct conclusions. So a lot of things can hang out in the “I just don’t know” category. Those await more information for us to make those calls.

We can say it doesn’t look good or it doesn’t look bad on our first impressions, yet we just don’t know. Pending. A lot of things are pending where the jury is still out, as they say. Maybe that is a good place to be, or maybe that is not necessarily good. It all depends.

Why go through this rationale at all? Because at some point it matters in a lot of instances. Sometimes it is important and sort of requires fast conclusions where we are not able to render one. Sometimes it is important to take considerable time in making it. Thus, the rush to judgment.

Long for the days when you watched a movie when it was very obvious who was the good guy and who was the bad guy. It seemed to make things simpler. But it doesn’t seem that way today.

When you combine this with systemic problems in systems, it muddies those waters further. When there is corruption on the scale we’ve seen recently, it raises the complexity of a judgment call. While we still know that some things are obviously wrong, they are deliberately shrouded in a systemic pool of corruption to determine who is really at fault.

Remember the old line from Germans that they were only following orders. As if all these things were not enough, put on top of that historical precedents like corruption that never happened before. (never seen) Historical, unprecedented failures and corruption.

You have to use all this to preface the situation we are now in. Sure, we can have an election and get the result that some nefarious people/groups want, for their own purposes, but that doesn’t make it right or legit. It cannot legitimize the process.

Sure, we can have an investigation in search of a justification for the investigation. Sure, we can do an impeachment over things that are normal or legal to do, just because we are determined to have an impeachment.

Sure, we can fail to get answers to things, which were done collectively through the power of state, where no one can seem to be held responsible. Sure, we can have major failures of trust in our institutions then turn around to bestow more power on them, after they thoroughly abused their authority. But who is to stop these things from happening; who will prevent them?

So we can count on courts, those arbiters of the facts. But they are not always given the whole truth. What happens then? We can have faulty outcomes from those entrusted to be the guardrails for law and order.

At some point, we the people have to make our own judgments about all these things, and the consequences, but that process can get very messy. And the mileage varies.

It can get even messier when self-government is stood on its head. We were designed as a republic (if you can keep it) but are leaning toward mob rule – and not necessary a democratic mob. That is a mob which, at its heart, does not care about majority; doesn’t care who is right, doesn’t even care about the rules. It is entirely demand-based. It wants what it wants and it wants it now. It doesn’t care about deliberative, due process. It only wants to be satisfied, which by nature it can never be. It will always be wanting.

How is it that we the people have to deal with all these things and yet are expected to make the right decisions and judgments on everything? We are the guardians expected to keep that republic, but can we when its obstruction prevents that from happening?

We the people need to make some serious, life-affecting decisions. Can we save what is rightfully ours to save? Can we be depended on, by future posterity, to do the right thing given all these circumstances?

May God grant us the wisdom necessary.

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2021

Institutional Failure

We no longer have the luxury of debating serious concepts or ideas, but can only opine on current political reality. As long as we still can anyway.

But this column or next just might be the last, at this critical stage. Who knows? That is the political reality of the time. Just call this an SOS to the future.

Odd how America was always standing up for those timeless principles and freedoms like speech or basic civil liberties. Not anymore. That is the stuff of yesteryear now.

All of this in our current reality is due to institutional failure. No, it is not just a president’s dictate or even Congress’s decrees; it takes more than that to really set our country off the irreversible edge. Our institutions have a big and necessary role in that condition, not only governmental institutions but private or non-governmental institutions.

Right now they are screaming for us to jump, “don’t look back. Hurry up!”

Who are they? Well, media for one has a big role. But there are plenty others like policy centers, research labs to big corporations to technology, universities, education. All working hand and glove in a concerted, malicious way against civil liberties of people is enough to throw in the towel on society — as if government failure and corruption were not enough of a problem.

But all operating in a concerted effort, until you have something that makes George Orwell blush in his grave. And snark is substituted for substance in defense of what they do. So what is the answer to that? Well, we don’t know because we probably were never to this pinnacle before. Sadly, we just don’t know.

Institutions are to society what sin is to mankind. It is the cancerous rot that can destroy the body from inside out. If left corrupt and untreated, it can unleash a ticking clock on the mantle of freedom and all we hold dear. Or you could call that the glue or ligaments that hold us all together. And what a number both can do on us in a short amount of time.

So now a first amendment case to defend one’s self is no longer an acceptable option?

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2021

Comfortable Normalcy

Those who desire the comfort of normalcy have fooled themselves, and likely sold their hearts to slavery.

I think some Muckety-muck somewhere said that. Instead of worrying about the COVID virus, maybe we should start worrying about what Democrats have mutated into.

Mitt Romney put a tweet out days ago. See if you spot the devious flaw in it?

“Despite the differences Americans may have on matters of policy, we share the common goal of ensuring that America continues to be a beacon of hope and freedom for all.” — 10:01 AM · Jan 20, 2021

What pure gibberish. Beacon of hope — who cares about that? Freedom? The Democrats and Left don’t care about all that. It sounds nice but it is not true by any measure.

And there is nothing you can do to make these people care about our country. They only want to beat our heads over it as a useful tool. Other than as a weapon, it has no merit that America is an exceptional country. They compromised that away long ago.

Obama tried to drive the stake in the heart of that. Can we beat it idea into their heads? No, they have to willingly believe that. But it is obvious in everything they do.

They have lost any appreciation for America’s originalism and exceptionalism. Now they only want to be like everyone else. They prefer normalcy over exceptional.

So who in the hell is Romney kidding, and whom is he talking to?

In the first few days, O’Biden attacked and canceled out the 1776 Project. Why take issue with that? I think we know. Why stand against a pipeline now creating thousands of jobs and building the economy? I think we know. Why attach our progress in controlling the border by promising to open the borders? I think we know that too.

Why remove restrictions on foreign interference and equipment in our energy grid?

The National Pulse reported:

”President Biden has revoked a Trump-era executive order that sought to keep foreign countries and companies out of America’s bulk power systems – principally entities associated with the Chinese Communist Party – as part of his “Executive Order on Protecting Public Health and the Environment and Restoring Science to Tackle the Climate Crisis.”

“The executive order, which executes key tenets of President Biden’s climate change agenda, was released on the former Veep’s first day in office.” Read

Why would Biden do that?

Meanwhile, back at the Fed on December 7, they voted 6-0 to join forces with a scheming green Global cabal.

“Rather Than Focus on Helping the American Economy Prosper, The FED Joins Central Banks in ‘Greening’ the Financial Industry” — Gateway Pundit

“Now the FED is off on another insane journey which arguably has nothing to do with its mandate to the American people. The Hill reported on Dec. 15th:”

But you say, if these people had any appreciation for what America is, they have an awful strange way of showing it. Biden only has appreciation for what he can extort out of it,

As this continues, media is busy commending the brand new O’Biden administration for its return to normalcy. Dan Rather, after being exhumed from his dungeon as a defrocked journalist, says he is enjoying all the quiet comforts of it all.

“As I settle into a Saturday evening I breathe deeply, reflecting on how nice it feels to know that my sanity won’t be tied to the destructive whims of Mr. Twitchy Twitter Thumb.” — 8:59 PM · Jan 23, 2021

Dan, don’t let that security blanket bite you.

What is normal about cancelling restrictions on China and foreign interference with out power grid? Normalcy of open borders? Normalcy of opposing the 1776 Project? Take comfort in that normalcy. The normalcy of selling out America.

Oh, now they also attempt to impeach a president who is out of office.

But if you dare turn on the TV, you will be flooded with the verbiage about normalcy. Isn’t it great to be back in normal? So grab your Orwell and throw another log on the fire.

Ain’t Normalcy grand? I almost can’t wait to see where this normal train takes us next.

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2021

Non-Peaceful Resistance

I want to say a few words about the peaceful transition of power, which never occurred under Trump. It was non-peaceful resistance lasting four years.

And history can judge the actual transition part.

Now we are lectured about the value of a time-honored tradition of peaceful transfer of power. (my head spins every time I say it) We are supposed to pay homage to the swamp moving back in with its king and queen of Deep State taking their thrones.

I would just call it consolidating the Deep State. They didn’t care who was put in there, as along as they represent it and the ever-expanding swamp.

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2021

Chamber Of Violence

I feel like I am in some kind of echo chamber. On the right, we have been calling out the violence and rioting for months, even years. It is the Left, at every turn, who have failed in calling out never-ending violence. Joe Biden himself waited 5 months to even marginally criticize violence, in a very opaque and squishy way. He certainly did not call it what it was. The summer of sedition was a classic example.

Once again, I condemn the acts of violence that took place in the Capitol. It shouldn’t have happened and took place at the worst of times. Stories are that there was some infiltration of bad actors though I don’t know exactly. It was a partially frenzied crowd.

It is probably surmised by those who know me that at times I monitor CNN, for good reason. Someone needs to. So I have infuriated myself sometimes by perusing mainstream media’s caustic content. I would call it some of the most volatile I have witnessed and a cocktail of sedition and stupidity. (Fluctuating shares) Others have exposed it as well.

So it comes to my surprise when they suddenly switch their rhetoric to calling the riot at the Capitol “insurrection.” And then labeling it the “Trump insurrection.” Nothing could be further from the truth. But as usual, the Left will stick to its narrative. They love volatile rhetoric except when talking about their own.

Surely, this has created a stain on the legacy of Trump. Or they want it to. Either way, it is more of a problem. But once again it can be used and weaponized, unfairly, against the entire movement. Only time will rectify this smear.

However, already authorities arrested over 60 people involved. Many more arrests are promised. But I don’t remember all the arrests in the violence over months and months. I do recall the left funding it and setting up bail accounts to assist perpetrators of revolution. But the Leftist media never complained about the culpability, aid and comfort from the Democrats, or against who were responsible. Who is siding with violence?

Instead, the Left’s knee-jerk reaction is to go straight to condemning Trump for violence. No such connections have been officially made to Democrats and their rhetoric.

And right on cue, they draw up another impeachment scheme. Nancy tried to force Pence to employ the 25th amendment. What is this about – other than their removal schemes? One is to force Trump to concede the election. The second goal is to prevent him from coming back or running in the future.

Both of which may now be tarnished by the violence that occurred. But it would not be if it were the Left. Remember Schumer screaming at the Supreme Court, to Kavanaugh and Gorsuch particularly, that they will pay the price after elections.  A direct threat to members of the Court. All of that was passed off, just as he berated two patrons at an exclusive restaurant in NYC. All of it dismissed as nothing. Chuck is “from Brooklyn.”

I am grieved for deaths that occurred at the Capitol; What exactly happened is still to be known. It disrupted the objection process. But I cannot forget and still follow the violent rhetoric on the left, with its direct correlations between Dems and thugs of sedition.

Though, as usual, Democrats are flirting with disaster once again. They seem unaware how this is used against the country, or they really don’t care. They are quite content in always smearing our country, its people, and democracy as well, all for their own political benefit. Another circumstance to use for political gain. Weaponize and attack, mercilessly.

Condemning it? That is not the problem. We still have fake news.

On the right, conservatives and Republicans know enough about it that we don’t support violence. On the left they do. They excuse, deny, encourage, or even endorse it outright. And the threats are made frequently. Have they condemned the violence and rhetoric against Republicans or Trump allies on their homes and families? Crickets.

Did you notice an absence of usual counter-protestors or Antifa in their garb? Curious.
Peaceful transition of power, peaceful transition of power” — after a 4-year coup?

They boarded up stores and cities around the election not from Trump supporters.

Four years of organizing, plotting, scheming, even courting violence…. Democrats.
Stirring up sedition, along with fueling a coup, was the whole point of their game.

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2021

Credibility Crisis

Do not be alarmed. Do not attempt to adjust your TV; it is not a faulty signal or your set. This is only a credibility crisis being streamed live to your living rooms or personal device. Brought to you by all the sponsors who have been working so hard, both behind the scenes and overtly, in the last four years.

I could name names starting with the media and active elected officials, even employees of the federal government. You know who you are. You want to think of yourselves as spectators but you are not. You think of yourselves as sanctimonious.

You are just as much active participants as the people who stormed inside the hallowed walls of the Capitol yesterday. You have responsibility. This couldn’t have happened without your willing participation in a four year assault on our system.

Now it has culminated in yet another election. But this time you got the results you wanted, This time you are satisfied with all your sordid efforts, no matter what it took. This time, for once, you are not in dissent with the results. Well, welcome to our world.

So one must take a stand and condemn the acts of violence? Now this demands everyone condemn it? There is no place for this activity? Where were they for months and months? But now, now it is wrong and it must be decried, unequivocally?

Don’t act like these are shocking results and pictures. Don’t feel so offended. What did you expect? What did you want to see happen? We know the goal all along.

The people were the butt of it.

Suddenly you want to preach about division and unity. You want to wax on process and the Constitution…. after months of defiling it. It is you, who have defined “democracy” downward.

I witnessed firsthand some of the coverage on Cspan. I watch the hosts feign outrage and take calls. While for months omission of the symptoms were ignored.

Every time the left does something, it is roundly ignored and then parsed down as if no one did anything wrong. But the first time the right does something, it is called an “attack on our democracy”. I’m sick of it.

Is our democracy so fragile that it cannot be questioned when it colors outside the lines, when it acts irresponsibly? Wasn’t our democracy under attack, under siege, for four years by the Left? I don’t care whether you call them BLM, Antifa, Bernie socialists, Marxists or social justice warriors. They have levied a war against our system for years.

They challenged a legitimate election for four years. Hillary told Joe Biden not to concede any loss, ever. She said he would win in the end. What did she mean? Now she says results of an election are being undermined, “democracy is under attack.”

The media has culpability in this. The media are the watchdogs. They stopped looking and caring. They didn’t want to look at any of the problems. They ignored it all. You can bet that had the election been the other way, every story would be chased down about what went wrong with the election — the way it was the last time. They spent four years investigating the 2016 election.

All I am saying is if the press and media are dead, then democracy is not far behind either. But that is not the end of it. That is only the starting point of the consequences to follow. Press and media have been whistling past these problems for years. In fact they have been laying the foundation for them and encouraging them.

Are answers to much to ask and expect?

So suddenly the media arises from its slumber to call all the people in the street thugs. They call it an insurrection. They even called it treason. They even say it is led from the top, Trump is organizing it.

Well, for eight years we had these commie organizers, thugs, and urban terrorists logging countless visits in the White House under Obama. Nothing was said about that. And we saw the fallout of “Occupy” movements and violent protests, shutting down highways etc. But it was dismissed wholesale.

All we want is a serious inquiry and a real investigation. If you spent four years on Russia, isn’t America worth it? How much fraud is enough? I’ve asked that before because the goalposts have moved. No fraud should be tolerable, it is the standard. Or was the standard. Now the goalpost is if fraud has made a difference and would alter the results of the election, then and only then it is intolerable.

But all the people want is a real meaningful investigation with real results of how we got here. Don’t talk about blanket reform garbage. That’s how we got here, They just reformed the entire election process but we are not suppose to notice or care? Just like they are reforming police and our justice system into the swamp. Anarchy is the new normal.

So they can call us the people any name they like, as if it were the answer: rioters, a mob, thugs, insurrectionists to traitors. But that solves nothing. The metamorphosis of their ever-evolving swamp continues, mostly unabated or unchallenged. Yet we stepped out of line. We stand condemned by the very swamp that brought it on.

Is democracy suddenly so fragile that it cannot be questioned or investigated? After all these months of uncivil disobedience, riots and sedition — all unchecked — now merely questioning the official process is a bridge too far.

They call the Capitol their temple of democracy. They said it was under siege yesterday. It has been under siege for years, and attacked relentlessly… along with the people who respect it.

What we ask is for an investigation to be honestly carried out and their newfound rules be examined, along with their means. We should demand nothing less. But democracy, like the freedom of press and speech, is dying on the vine and no one is trying to save it. In fact, they are pouring toxins on it put it out of its misery.

They are afraid of mob rule after we have been subjected to it for years. Media could not even report the attacks.

There is a credibility crisis in America.

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2021

Say It Isn’t So Joe, And Company

Is it time to demonize the Biden supporters and voters? Yes it is. Oh it is past time. In fact it is long overdue, but very necessary. Who says satire can’t be delicious? Here we go:

Just remember this above everything: these are the people.

These are the people who stood and cheered Hitler on in the 30’s. When Hitler made the trains run on time, these are the people who made it all possible. These are the very same people. The DNA is exacting science. No dispute.

These are the same people who enthusiastically whisked Hitler into power.

These are the people who never spoke up when Jews were dragged from their homes. These are the people who turned in their neighbors and then family members.

These are the people who donned the brown shirts to support the Fuehrer and punish enemies of the 3td Reich lurching within. These were the enforcers, the purge facilitators. These are the people who stomped out any resistance before it rose above a whisper.

So remember, this is who they are. They are the friends of the police state, the necessary pawns of the institutional elite that galvanized evil in its infancy. And proud of it.

These are the people who answered the orders when Lenin counseled to probe with bayonets; if you encounter mush proceed, if you encounter steel withdraw.

These are the people who allowed Maduro to take power in Venezuela. The people who empowered Hugo Chavez. The same ones who ushered in the revolution in Cuba.

These are the people who made Jonestown possible, the same people who gave Rev Jim Jones his power. They are the very same people who, when Jones issued the final order, they are the people who made certain their friends and family drank the Kool-Aid before guzzling down a gulp themselves. These are the people who held babies’ arms while pouring the poison into their mouths. These are the same people who made it all happen.

Since my belief in this makes me morally superior as judge, jury and executioner, I have so decided and therefore it is indisputable fact. They all stand condemned.

Take the medicine. Salivate, and then choke on it. Let it burn going down your throats.

~~~~

Now the only good news in all of that is clear. This can be redeemable for all of us. The Left will undoubtedly follow their own new standard they created. They hold the solution.

So we must now have, according to their new rules, by what they themselves have done to Trump, an investigation and coup launched before Biden takes office. Because, according to the rules, after he assumes office he will only be a defiled resident – illegitimate squatter.

There must be immediate impeachment proceedings started, ratified by public fiat. The de facto case will be made, based on what all he has done to this point, he cannot and will not ever be president. He must be removed and everything he did deemed illegitimate.

Then he and his complicit VP will have to resign in shame based on insurmountable evidence. It is not even contested. So his supporters would also agree and demand he does,

Surely they will comply since this is their own solution. We mst follow the Left’s prescription immediately. It is the only way to save the world.

Then maybe we would have some peace. That would be real justice. Let them now live up to their own standards. (I use the term loosely)

Baring those results and necessary outcome, all Democrats and officials of this government must stand up to defy any action of this illegitimate faux president. They are required to stand up in defiance as an enforceable act of resistance to this illegitimate phony. Anyone who doesn’t follow orders will suffer excruciating and permanent consequences for it.

BTW: here is a comment that is making the rounds on Twitter.
.

“Dear Joe, I’m happy you won. However, there will never be a time in my life when I ever forgive Trump, Pence, Mitch McConnell or Barr & the Republicans in congress who fought tooth and nail against Democracy. Please prosecute trump, his family, & every seditious republican!”

Sedition, you want to talk about sedition now? Oh, that’s rich!

Yes, demonization of Democrats and the Left is way too good for them considering what they’ve done. Ol’ Iggy says he has the tar and the pitchforks ready, if needed.

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2020

The Biden Syndicate

In honor of Jeopardy and Alex Trebek, I think I’ll go with Joe Biden for 10 million, please. That’s an excellent category.

Hunter Biden gets the rap for Joe Biden’s scandal but we miss the other connections.

Interesting that defenders of Biden will say these are other people, maybe even family members, but they are not Joe Biden. It leads to the latest talking point that their names were not on the ballot, Joe Biden was on the ballot. Maybe they were?

Then Tony Bobulinski toppled this world of spin with two words, saying the secret to the Biden MO was “plausible deniability.” That is to keep Joe’s direct fingerprints off of it. So everyone can always deny it. To that extent, Joe Biden et al were paranoid about that.

Obama was a big adherent of the same plausible deniability strategy. Funny how it works for Democrats. By design, which is what criminal minds and the RICO statute are all about.

That plausible deniability works until you have such a mountain of evidence and facts that you can no longer deny any connectivity to the deeds or the results. Finally, it becomes a flawed defense when all the deniability catches up to you.

The outcome is Joe and Jill Biden live a lavish lifestyle in mansions on a meager Senate salary, with a school-teacher wife, and no one dares ask how? How did they live in the most exclusive area in VA, in a former Hague mansion that is a 20k per/month estate? No one knows and no one cares. Or afford their million-plus-dollar home at the shore?

Look into Joe’s background sometime, like an old piece in Mother Jones (Nov ‘19). Still no one even cared to look at it before running old Joe up the platform as the little guy.

But beyond Hunter, Joes brother James has been very busy and media has not descended on that mountain of scandal so far. No interest. Oh, that’s just Joe’s brother, Dems will say. But that is the point, it is Joe’s brother.

And being Joe’s brother is certainly not lost on James. He built enormous deals based on the fact that he is Joe’s brother and of course Joe running for, and getting elected, president. That was the whole point of his hospital scandal still unfolding in PA.

Basically he was sued for stealing the operational blueprint for hospitals and began hawking it like his own. But that was only part of the whole scandal. The extent of James’ career in trading off of Joe’s name is far more lucrative and extensive. It takes a mindset to think like that when you read the details of the hospital venture.

A question surfaces if James was trying to destroy the company he allied with, on the basis that his brother Joe, if elected, would incorporate the plans into national policy? Then a M-East investment that never matterialized. It takes a scheming mind. There is far more there and mainstream hasn’t gone near it. It is in courts and apparently investigations.

Behind all of it was James Biden representing and selling himself as Joe’s younger brother – and what influence that could bring to any business relationship. It is the whole point of everything. The center of the universe is that he is Joe Biden’s brother. He was trading on the Joe Biden, now a family heirloom, name.

So with what we know of the Hunter Biden deal, or his brother’s, one salient point remains paramount in all. Simply put: without Joe Biden, there is no Hunter Biden… or no James Biden, or no Frank Biden. All of them traded on Joe Biden’s name, as if he were a Dupont. Joe was involved in the deals; it was constructed around him – as if it were a dynasty.

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2020

Change The World

Euphoric aspirations about changing the world have been around for a long time. We like to think it is based on something other than hope.

Obama pretty much fueled his campaign on such notions, based on invisible rationale. He ran an entire movement on adherents to his con. He predicted seas would cease to rise. He was no more successful than the false hope he promoted.

Another person will come along promising to change the world. False hope will be in bountiful supply. Will they? Will people who graft onto false hope really change the world? It is doubtful.

It does not stop the aspirations of people trying. They believe they figured out something you and I don’t know. They found the secret sauce. If it were only that easy?

Reality sort of bites you in the ass every now and then. It can dash hopes faster than a torpedoed submarine. “We get it,” they always say. “But you can’t stop us from trying.” Maybe not.

Though circumstances do matter. If we cannot change the results of a rigged election, then how can we change the world? If we cannot keep corruption at bay, or preserve justice, how then will they change the whole world?

Leftists never offered any evidence they could change the world, they just asserted it. Remember the Arab spring Obama was excited about? It turned into one of the most awful things we’ve seen. But they had all their hopes on it anyway. Never mind results.

Now here we are, off of the worst corrupted election in modern times and so many act as if this is all normal. Nothing to see here. People even say it was smooth as silk. We know and they know that can’t be right. But who cares anyway, if they got the result they wanted?

Joe Biden told Stacy Abrams that if they had 10 more like her, they could rule the world. There’s a scary thought. But what would he do with that power? Too many questions.

So full of themselves are they that all logic and reason has been evicted from the equation. They think and perceive, therefore it is. How arrogant is that?

When it is time to evaluate the results of their schemes, suddenly their defense is silent. Then it is time to move on. They meant well. It was the intent that matters. But history and the world move on, no better for the wear. Scars mean nothing to a world on fire.

Is it any wonder some of us are jaded at their baseless optimism? However, denial doesn’t stop them. They said it therefore it is. They are gods of destiny and the sky is the limit.

Not all change is good either. Have we established that yet? They changed all the rules for elections, which seem to be here to stay. What have we gotten in exchange? What are the results? Time convicts their insanity but “have another bite of that mushroom, it’s good for what ails you.” Maybe they just did not exert the proper amount of force last time.

“So keep on trying, we’re getting closer.”

Meanwhile, democracy – if that is what they are still calling it – has taken a backseat to their whims of authoritarian rule. All they need is enough force to fulfill all their pleasures. And we see a lot of proof of what their pleasures really are.

So we should not look closer at all the fraud in the election if the results wouldn’t have been different. But who says results would not have changed? The purpose is to look.

Change the world, change our elections, change our system, change our laws, change presidents; notice a pattern?

While we are at it, let’s just change back to what it was five years ago, before the coup went down. Let’s change back to what the people rejected in 2016.

They can change the world but we cannot change fraud in elections – don’t bother trying.

Joe Biden now says: (just some latest quotes in the timeline)

“I know you’re probably tired of hearing about politics after this year. But with just 15 days left until the Georgia Senate runoffs, we can’t take our foot off the gas.”

“Georgia — Your vote has the power to change the future of this country. Don’t wait to use it.”

Translation: what Biden really means is: in one month we begin to heel.

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2020

Smarmy, Swampy, Swalwell

Does anyone have any doubts that Swalwell is compromised? Why he is even on the intelligence committee raises more questions? But how he remains there is a puzzle.

Legal Insurrection has the story. Skip over there.

Report: Chinese Spy Targeted California Politicians, Including Rep. Eric Swalwell

Posted by Mary Chastain Tuesday, December 8, 2020 | Legal Insurrection

“Fang had a well-thought-out plan:

She used political gatherings, civic society conferences, campaign rallies, and campus events to connect with elected officials and other prominent figures, according to U.S. intelligence officials, Bay Area political operatives, former students, and current and former elected officials who knew her.”

So he gets on that committee as a sophomore congressman and is then kept on even after this came out. Hello, Nancy. But might it also explain why Swalwell is so attached to the hip of Adam Schiff? Certainly looks a whole lot like a sterling protégé. (or he acts like one)

New code name: Feng shui Swalwell. (sort of grows on you)

Hypocrisy Takes 2020 By Storm

Back early in the year, I declared this year would be the year of hypocrisy. Well, that may not be that big of a prediction. But I didn’t know what was going to happen, it was simply based on the trajectory of politics at the time. You could read those posts here and here.

Remember we were having the impeachment over a phone call and quid pro-quo Joe was only a glimmer on the political stage. But he had a quid pro-quo with Ukraine and boasted about it. Since then, it has been worse than anything I could have thought.

Hypocrisy is everywhere, from the gov in California to the Speaker of the House, to the results of the 2020 election. So hypocrisy reigned supreme in everything. It seems a safe bet in most any year to call it a year of hypocrisy. In September, I revised the prediction to the year of multi-tasking. That is sort of self-explanatory. Indeed the people were doing more than one thing and juggling many things at once. That was true too.

But then hypocrisy busted through the finish line with ease. Of course this is all only my opinion – as they say those can vary. The sheer hypocrisy this year should be evident.

Impeachment of a president when they themselves should have been impeached. With everything we found out, there was no way to hide all they had done to Trump or to the people. But here they were only impeaching a president they claimed was never legitimate anyway. And actually it was Joe Biden who had done exactly what they were accusing Trump of doing. Then came Nancy Pelosi devoutly tearing up the President’s speech in front of us. Supposedly denying his legitimacy. Though her credibility was shredded.

Yet at the very time they were doing this, a pandemic from hell was bearing down on the US. They poo-poohed it as a real threat. Pelosi and Health Dept officials in NY both took to public pronouncements that COVID was defacto DOA – dead on arrival — in the US.

Months later they switched rhetoric to the president was not doing enough to prevent it. Then they started the gloomy prognosticating on how bad it was, while blaming Trump. Incidentally, has anyone seen another country blame its leader for COVID_19?

There was also the Cuomo version of events. First he denied COVID was a problem outside a normal flu. Then he blamed Trump for everything as he himself enacted orders to send COVID into nursing homes. He went from blaming Trump to then arguing that the virus did not come from China, but from Europe. Anyone watching him give his daily briefings was curious what new thing he would say each day to contradict himself.

Cuomo refused to stop travel from NYC at the hiight of the virus, yet later on would swing to blocking people from coming to NYC. He demanded new hospitals be erected, including putting a ship in the harbor, but he never used them.

And of course one has to add that meanwhile dealing with the pandemic, Cuomo was writing a book on how well he dealt with the pandemic.But it should be called the definitive book of hypocrisy, by the defining hypocrite of the era.

On and on it has gone. Yes, hypocrisy is putting in a very strong finish to the year.

Before, election Democrats railed about post offices being a den of conspiracy against a fair election. They singled out the Post Master General. After election, what problems?
Democrats had scrutinized Dominion and its software as a threat to democracy. Now, what problem? Democrats said the only hope to end the virus was a vaccine. Now, on approval, it is not the be all end all. Maybe it should wait for Biden?

Then of course Democrat lawmakers issued their lockdown procedures, sometimes just before going out to violate the orders themselves. Then they feigned apologies that they are sorry. But are they? Austin’s mayor broadcasted lockdown orders from Mexico.

First they told us masks were unnecessary and even put you at risk. Now they demand you wear them. Vaccine was the bomb until it came out, then Democrats said they would refuse to take accept it because it came out under Trump.

They kept big box stores open but smaller businesses had to be shut or they pulled their business license. But they decided liquor stores could be essential businesses.

What they deemed essential or non-essential was entirely subjective. Then they said science was king, but none of the economy shutdown was science at all.

And let us not forget the Hydroxychloroquine fiasco. Usage of it was blocked. They said it could kill you. They managed to ban a cheap drug with promising, effective results. Then they called us conspiracy theorists.

The FDA said (6/15/20): “the known and potential benefits of CQ and HCQ no longer outweigh the known and potential risks for the authorized use.”

Of course one of the worst things was politicizing a pandemic that does not respect any politics. They told us the rights to protest were paramount over any lockdown restrictions. Millions of people marched in the streets while churches had to remain closed on orders from the state. Violators were heavily fined, even jailed. Meanwhile they set ‘no bail’ legislation for criminals, essentially turning them loose after arrest.

Violence even superseded any health restrictions. “Mostly peaceful protests” became a euphemism for riots, violence and looting for the year.

Police shootings or attacks were frequently ignored as individual incidents of police misconduct were panned across the country, 24/7. Abc said “police officers killed surge 28%” in 2020, “and some point to civil unrest and those looking to exploit it.”

And the answer for this phenomena and numbers of police attacks? Wait for it… abolish or defund the police. Some areas acted on these hypocritical demands to cut police funding.

But later on, Democrats claimed they did not want to defund the police as we said they did. They invented the term re-imagine police. They claimed Dems did not call for “defunding.”

Democrats said Donald J Trump was out to steal the election, then they proceeded to have the worst fraud-plagued election in history. All justified of course. Then they called it the smoothest election in modern history.

They even argued that fraud may have been present but it was not enough to change the results of the election. Excuse me, but that was the entire purpose for it. Enough?

Democrats wanted to employ the 25th amendment against Trump claiming he was not psychologically fit or capable of holding the office. But then along came Joe Biden, who they claimed would be the most competent president for America, excellently qualified.

Indeed Democrats spent four long, miserable years claiming Trump was illegitimate and that the election was rigged in favor of Trump. Then they proceeded to create the most rigged election in history from rule changes right through Election Day. But nothing to see here, people, it was a superb election. We were called conspiracists.

So now the candidate who did not campaign, staying in his basement bunker, happened to get more votes than any presidential candidate in history? 13 million more than Obama.

They claimed Antifa was not a threat, and Joe Biden declared it an idea – not an actual organization of terror and crime. So Pelosi said Trump and Republicans were “enemies of the state”  by scaring people from voting. Then the press ignored her outrageous claim  after they complained that Trump labeled press/media enemies of the people.

Let’s remember that Pelosi declined a 1.8 trillion dollar aid package offer. Then she accepted a 900 billion dollar package calling it a success because now we have a new president. She told a reporter that the earlier negotiation was not a failure, on her part, but is why they got here. So getting a new president was her real objective? Pelosi got a professional blowout in a closed salon, then said she was set up by the owner.

Yes, after years of not accepting Hillary’s failure, media demands Trump accept the fraud election. Then they have the nerve to say that no time in history was there ever a president and election labeled illegitimate. (David Gergen fielded that whopper on CNN)

But just add another that Democrats wanted the entire economy to be shut down by executive action. Then they claimed that Trump ruined the economy. They demanded presidential action, then they claimed states rights. But later they claimed Trump failed to issue a federal mandate. Cuomo threatened a federal mandate would incite civil war.

There was so much more that could be said about this stellar year of hypocrisy.

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2020