Meet the guy the Hale-Bopp comet left behind….
Sure Bernie, just listen to his sales pitch.
The Heaven’s Gate cult — now there was a case study for “human solidarity.”
But they had nothing on old Bern. Bernie’s Gate anyone?
Sure Bernie, just listen to his sales pitch.
The Heaven’s Gate cult — now there was a case study for “human solidarity.”
But they had nothing on old Bern. Bernie’s Gate anyone?
Democrats (or progressives) have bequeathed us the most dangerous times. There are hardly any parallels. But if you did mention any, everyone would scramble to talk about that other time not this one.
It is a direct result of what Democrats have done and continue to do. We are careening toward a space that none of us should want to go. Yet Democrats are full speed ahead.
Two things serve as illustrations. The first is a complete reversal from the talk in 2016. When Republicans had an unprecedented array of candidates, we heard a drumbeat that no one could beat Hillary Clinton. They even had Bernie on the same par.
Until they did get a bright idea saying that, according to polls, the only guy who could beat Hillary and presumably Bernie was John Kasich. They told us he alone had the best chance of winning in 2016, even if he could not manage to win the primary.
How times change. Now in 2020, all the polls suspiciously show every top candidate on the left beating Trump. Is that a laugh? And coincidentally, the top Democrats have a 9 or 10 point lead. Where have I heard that before?
I think the left needs a different calculus though. Notice how they rank Democrats with Biden at the top and down the list — and he has a large lead over others. I’d like to see a completely different ranking considering the times. Why not rank them by threat level or who is the most dangerous? That would be useful.
For instance, one of their candidates is Inslee. Sure he is not one of the top contenders but he certainly has a dangerous factor. He is so green he can’t see straight and wants to abolish coal. Basically he wants the biggest war on energy we have seen yet. If it destroys America, they don’t care as long as they did it “green” it would be something to be proud of. Place your bets.
Bernie is a complete danger to everything else that makes America work. We don’t know exactly how he could and would do any of it. That leaves executive order as his only means. But he does have enough of a commie, socialist base to make him dangerous.
Biden, well, he is no stranger to selling out America. And he never had a foreign policy that worked. He could be a gift to China or N. Korea. And you know about their deal with Iran. Plus he would bring back all the same actors as we just got rid of in there. And Deep State would be rejuvenated. The myth that he has some understanding with blue collar working people is hilarious. Yet the media have sold that lie long enough.
The whole purpose of guys like Joe or the others is that they don’t want a great economy. Their goal is the opposite. And they want everyone begging at the door of federal government. Biden being some kind of uniter? Well that’s just not how any of this works.
Elizabeth Warren, if she doesn’t scare the hell out of every sane person, I don’t know what would. In fact, that is her whole gig, threats and intimidation. She wants everyone subservient to all-powerful government. That would be the best setup for pure socialism you could ask for.
Now Democrats have moved on again in their wish list of agenda items. Next up, let’s talk about reparations. While they are all out on the campaign trail talking about unity and healing divisions, they are all pushing the reparations train now. Nothing more unifying than that. A bloody civil war was not enough for these people.
How about reparations for the most racist institution in the last century, the DNC? It was actually built on racism.
If those primers aren’t enough to get your danger juices flowing, then there are Dems’ daily positions and reactions to hard current events as they happen, to give you a glimpse into their collective mindset. There is always the tried and true hate America plank of the party. The anti-American wing has eaten the entire party.
Shout out to the borderless and lawless agenda here. But it is not some small marginal group of the far left anymore. So the calls to abolish ICE weren’t enough of a clue? How about the cop killers that get radio silence from the party? Better yet, undermine any remaining control of the border – or its legal controlling authority. Not just against the wall, they are against any enforcement of our borders or our laws. And they take to the streets on a moments notice to protest our enforcement of law and order. Heck, they are organized in such a way as to facilitate and encourage illegal immigration. And they make no bones about the fact that they give illegals preference over law-abiding American citizens.
How about those sanctuary cities? Oh, I’m sorry, did I mean sanctuary states now? The main purpose of Democrats, more and more these days, seems to be to facilitate crime waves and defend the criminals and those who harbor them. Then blame any cause of it on bad America.
Might as go all the way, while they are at it. Onward to late term abortions right up to the delivery date. Let’s even put that up for grabs, just in case you did not avail yourself of killing the baby at first chance, try try again. Who can say no to that agenda anymore? Who could draw arbitrary lines on institutionalized baby killing?
Even that is not quite enough to quench the appetite for evil. What they need to do is get rid of the Hyde Amendment. There cannot be any room for a wall in our government against directly subsidizing killing babies. Better still; just remind us all that abortion is a pillar of our economy. Yeah, that’s the ticket.
Hadn’t seen enough of this anti-American sideshow yet? Well there is great news for you, then. How about a basic war on the bill of rights? How about a war on freedom and religious speech? What are progressive values without that? It’s a great fundraiser too. That would eliminate half the problems in the country if they could just tear out the heart of freedom. The rest of the agenda would come a lot easier.
And take out the 2nd Amendment.
While they are all for resistance to this president, administration and legitimate election results; they are all about limiting any resistance to their agenda by any means necessary. Fill in the blanks there too numerous to mention. Just say nothing is off the table.
Right Ring | Bullright
Oh, when will they ever learn? More lies, more coverup, more scandals.
A new story explodes that media no doubt has zero interest in reporting. If they do, it will need expert Obamafiles’ spin on it for them. You know how Obama never knew anything until it appeared in the paper. In this case, it was sure not to show up there.
by Brian Cates — June 14, 2019 | Epoch Times
President Donald Trump’s long-anticipated visit to Europe during the 75th anniversary of the D-Day invasion has now come and gone. He arrived in the United Kingdom on June 3 and departed for Ireland on June 5 before hopping across the channel for the official D-Day ceremonies in France on June 6.
What I would like to draw attention to is what occurred immediately prior to Trump’s arrival in the UK, and what subsequently happened immediately after his departure.
Just prior to Trump’s visit, UK Prime Minister Theresa May announced that she would be resigning. She made this announcement on May 24 and stated that June 7 would be her last day in office. Literally one of the last things she would do as Prime Minister would be meeting with Trump.
Following Trump’s departure from Europe, it was suddenly revealed in the UK press that a massive terrorist bomb plot in London by the Iran-linked terror group, Hezbollah, had been foiled several years ago and that authorities had deliberately hidden this plot from the public.
It was in the fall of 2015 that British intelligence agency MI5 discovered a cell of Hezbollah terrorists operating in Northwest London. According to reporting by The Telegraph, the group had amassed a stockpile of more than three metric tons of ammonium nitrate, a fertilizer compound that is a popular key component in homemade bombs.
The Oklahoma City bombing in 1995 by domestic terrorist Timothy McVeigh, in which he killed 168 people while causing extensive damage to the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building, involved two tons of ammonium nitrate. This Hezbollah terror cell had compiled three tons at the time they were caught. So let’s make this crystal clear: this was not going to be any kind of small-scale attack on London. …/
[Continue reading. A real story – not phony media news. Follow links.]
Okay, but who cares about why May stepped down when what Obama did making the Iran deal buried all the real information, and intelligence, that we had at the time?
Another feather in his no-scandal legacy — to be hidden or deleted in his Lie-Barry.
Will there be any probe into this? Probably not. Talk about conspiracy and cover up!
Over a week ago, I was prepared to say I had given up on even the remotest idea of Hillary ever being held accountable. It seemed the one thing we can count on today beside taxes is Hillary walking away. Not much public confidence in justice out there.
Then came word that Durham’s office was staffing up and already conducting interviews. Then came DOJ’s announcement that Barr was doing a broad investigation. (I do like the term broad in there) And he said he was examining CIA. All right then.
So now I see a little hope in an otherwise bleak tunnel. What is there to base that hope on? I have no answer, just asking. I guess we have to hang on for the long ride, again.
Along comes the duck and cover media. George Stephanhoopla does an interview with Trump. He asks the only thing they care about — the whole reason for the interview. Suppose someone from a foreign government offers you information , would you (A)take it or (B)call FBI? So only two choices? Well, Trump said maybe you do both. Immediately the buzzers declare “wrong answer.”
Media also claims that type of information pedaling can influence elections and “undermines our democracy.” Then can we have any country left after what Hillary did? We know the details of what she did, no need to dredge through all that.
I’ll be darned, a whole interview to get that plus a new AF-1 design? But that’s all the press needed. It happens to be the same time Donald Trump Jr is speaking to the Senate, again, on that very subject. That’s not the only coincidence for George’s question of the year.
We can see a foundation forming for the defense of Hillary “the rotten” Clinton. That question is the critical predicate of it. Have everyone agree taking information is bad, calling FBI is the only answer. Then they will say that is what Hillary’s campaign did.
That defense is almost laughable after everything she did. But it is supposed to get her off the treasonous hook. (taking foreign information is treason) It is more than a defense for Hillary; it’s one for intelligence and everyone else too. So when they get nailed, they can claim to be working or cooperating with FBI, intelligence and the investigation. Media will then call them all heroes not traitors. Yep, that’s their defense coming down the pike.
Actually, George Stephanopoulos’ interview could be labeled opposition research. Though at what point in all this does press’s information pedaling become treasonous?
Right Ring | Bullright
One thing stuck in my craw for the duration of the Washingtonian malfeasance is a simple phrase all too common now. Widely and wildly misused. It is more a defense and deflection of the Swamp than an indictment of it.
That phrase is some form of: “we should not criminalize politics” or our political process. Alan Dershowitz popularized it but many used it. It’s now an institutional euphemism.
The original intended beneficiary of the phrase was foremost to be Hillary Clinton. But it was applied in defending Obama too. It may now legitimately be used defending Trump. Though those three instances are apples and oranges. True, they try to criminalize everything Trump does. It has been normalized. Let’s deal with Hillary and Obama.
I resent something called what it is not. In Hillary’s case, it is as a complete misdescription of events. Hillary started her job as Secretary of State in 2009, after lying about creating a wall between the Foundation with her name on it. That conflict was to be expunged, but never was. She knew it, Bill knew it, her top advisors knew it. All were aware how she would use the job as Sec of State. That was the whole point in her taking the job.
She engaged in criminal conduct from the onset.
The crux is even deeper. She began by setting up an illegal server from the start. She never used a State email. Her advisors knew it. She did it to circumvent FOIA and public accountability. The whole purpose by design was to obstruct justice. That was her goal.
The act came first, meaning her job duties were subordinate to political considerations. However, her actions were criminal from the beginning. She was not compliant with the law from the git-go.
Now we are lectured that we the people should not criminalize our political process. Really?
State was politicized too, not just by her. Obama deliberately did not install an Inspector General at State for Hillary. It only had an existing, “acting” temporary (placeholder) office. Politicized and weaponized as was nearly every other department, like Justice.
We now know that in the 2016 campaign, Hillary was taking money from foreign sources. We also know what she was doing with Russians, Perkins Coie, Fusion GPS, Crowd Strike, Ukrainians, an agent of a foreign government, creating a dossier, pedaling it to our intelligence community and co-opting our executive branch. Using existing politicization and further weaponizing intelligence, collaborating with Obama and his administration.
Does all that sound like legitimate, legal campaign conduct — which is being criminalized?
So the point is Hillary and Obama’s criminal deeds criminalized our political process. But we are criminalizing politics by wanting accountability? Not to forget how they weaponized government against the people, interfered with elections and later staged a coup.
But the real source of the whole problem was that Trump beat Hillary in her dirty, illegal game — politics. He was also running against an abuse of power and obstruction of justice. They are now trying to criminalize the very politics that beat them.
Don’t cry to me about people criminalizing routine political conduct and election process. None of Democrats’ was routine. People who stage coups have no credibility.
Right Ring | Bullright
You don’t say? Exactly what we said, knew and saw. File it under old news, as it was exposed in 2016. But the intent has no expiration date. Remember when…
Justin Caruso | 10/24/2016 | The Daily Caller
The newest batch of John Podesta’s hacked emails released by Wikileaks shows Obama’s transition team kept lists of Muslim and Asian candidates for jobs in the administration.
According to an email chain from 2008, John Podesta received lists of exclusively Muslims and Asians to be considered for jobs in the Obama administration. The email chain revealed that in this process, Middle Eastern Christians were purposefully excluded, or set aside in a separate list, with an aide writing,
In the candidates for top jobs, I excluded those with some Arab American background but who are not Muslim (e.g., George Mitchell). Many Lebanese Americans, for example, are Christian. In the last list (of outside boards/commissions), most who are listed appear to be Muslim American, except that a handful (where noted) may be Arab American but of uncertain religion (esp. Christian).
Also notable, there was concern that some of the Muslims suggested would not survive media scrutiny, with one aide writing, “High-profile Muslim Americans tend to be the subject of a fair amount of blogger criticism, and so the individuals on this list would need to be ESPECIALLY carefully vetted.”
She continues, “I suspect some of the people I list would not survive such a vet — but I do personally know, at least in part, virtually all of the candidates in the 1st two categories (but I know very few of those listed for outside boards/commissions).”
Within the lists themselves, candidates were further broken down, with every candidate labeled by their nationality and sometimes race.
This follows a pattern of the Obama Administration using race and religion to determine hiring, with other leaked emails showing potential political appointees being labeled with an F for female, B for black, H for Hispanic, and M for Muslim.
Another Wikileaks release showed the Obama transition team keeping extensive lists of non-white candidates for administration posts.
So any surprise there? Only that they were so coordinated about doing it. Can anyone say litmus test? In other words, Article VI, no religious test. In this case, it was completely religious. Discrimination was the process. The left had no problem with that.
But then the results were obvious to everyone, or it should have been.
It only makes me wonder, will someone someday have the gonads to write the book on what Obama did flagrantly from the beginning to end? I kind of doubt it but like to hope so. It was as bad as we thought and then even worse. Yet it needs to be memorialized.
Any questions? All right then!
Calling all traitors, cleanup in isle one. It seems we have an endless coup in front of us, but only the dumbest among us don’t see it. It was the coup that never had an end.
By now, the mask is off that most Democrats and the media know what has gone on and continues, they just continue to try to deny it exists. But that is getting harder and harder each day. Denial requires more and more effort as it goes, so that to accept their bullshit rationalization now would ‘require the willing suspension of disbelief.’
You could probably write a dozen titles and all would be correct, like “traitors among us.” “It’s high time for a coup” works too. “Who needs elections when you have the power of a coup?” Or “whatever happened… doesn’t matter.” See what I mean? The solution:
Cliff Nichols |Jun 02, 2019 | Townhall
Mueller’s press conference this week should be giving the president a good reason to be asking, how long can his administration afford to allow this coup d’ état to continue before a quorum of public opinion takes hold in this country that will wrongfully compel him by force of some unlawful process, if not arms, to be removed from office?
Undeniably, America is in the midst of a civil war. The only things not yet flying are the bullets.
Liberals in Congress are demanding our president be impeached for undefined offenses. Liberal federal judges are letting themselves be used to thwart his policies at every turn. A complicit liberal media, with the help of Hollywood, is doing its very best to enable the president’s enemies to foment in the public’s mind — without evidence — that he is a liar, a cheat and a criminal who must be removed from office. And Mueller’s press conference brought this tempest to an even greater boil than when the president was first elected over two years ago.
For one reason, because the president has survived long enough to expose a coup attempted by former high-ranking officials within our government and complicit members of the media to bring him down. Independent investigations have revealed they took affirmative actions in furtherance of a conspiracy to unlawfully — i.e., undemocratically — overthrow his administration, which is a crime.
In a word, they committed treason.
In summary, these liberal elitists felt they knew better what’s good for America than did the millions of people who elected the president. And so to thwart him and them, the Clintons and the DNC “allegedly” paid to create a false dossier that not only slandered the president but then was used by Hillary’s sympathizers to fraudulently legitimize their spying on his campaign before the election and to undermine his administration ever since.
The key thing to remember is that it never ended, and the cover up continues while their mission continues. (take that Tricky Dick!) Now all aboard their sedition train.
Right Ring | Bullright
What did Mueller say this infamous day, May 29, 2019? I’ll take the liberty to sum it up into one simple, central core and a glaring thesis.
Mueller knew from the beginning, considering the established rules and regulations surrounding it, that the purpose of his investigation was to be used as an impeachment report for a political witch-hunt. Why do I know that?
How could it possibly have been anything but that, given the conditions?
My translation is based on exactly what he said. And Mueller took the job knowing that situation up front, right on the table. Everyone did. It went on as such for the duration.
The saga continues, right on schedule.
Right Ring | Bullright
So this is what our partners in British press are up to?
With his compliant attorney general, the man in the White House is taking aim at the constitutional balance of powers. — [I think they misspelled ‘competent’ AG.]
Congressman Jared Huffman of California said: “It’s a smokescreen, obviously an attempt to change the subject like everything else he does. I almost don’t want to dignify it because it’s so preposterous that any time someone investigates Donald Trump or disagrees with Donald Trump they are being treasonous or they need to be locked up.
“This is a slippery slope to a banana republic if this is where we’re heading. And I think most Americans get that. You just don’t call for your political enemies to be investigated and jailed in the United States,” Huffman said.”
Imperial what? It doesn’t seem too imperial to me. An Imperial Congress, maybe.
Yet that is exactly what Democrats and the left are doing, and have been doing since even before the election — having their political enemies investigated. Just that we were not to know the depths of this incestuous cabal. Odd to hear British press complaining after allies there were also involved. Pointing the finger back at Trump has gotten a bit old.
And if that were not enough crazy talk for you, consider Nancy Pelosi’s broad smear attack (wrap-up smear) on Trump, saying he “is engaged in a coverup.” She followed that projection by claiming Trump is crying out for his impeachment. If impeachment can swing by the seats of their pants, they even plan to blame Trump for their impeachment scheme.
So, right on cue they are outraged Trump pulled the trigger to declassify documents and have AG Barr, with investigators, look into the real charade and coverup that started the whole cabal. And guess what? It wasn’t Trump that did that!
Last but not least, a congresswoman also said that “we cannot do our job in congress unless we can hold the president accountable.” Accountable for what, their plot and coup?
Now refusing to do their own job in the House, they want to blame that on Trump too.
Right Ring | Bullright
This is a very simple post. It is now confirmed what we surmised about the 2106 election and what they did to a sitting president. But what are we going to do about it?
Deception is so much of Democrats’ strategy that when truth is uncovered they respond with anger and vitriol to deflect and redirect public anger. That is their reaction.
Look what their campaign of Resistance has done to this country. If their fabricated cabal is that big, just imagine what it is covering up – and why? Let the sedition trials begin.
Right Ring | Bullright
Almost any plot even close to the size of this Russia conglomerate thing requires stooges to propel it and keep it alive. Lots of them, the more the better.
But that’s no problem for the hoodlums of revision. The left has plenty of those and it doesn’t have to rent them; they are available for free. They’re happy to lend their voices.
That is the best kind of willing dupes, who will carry the message far and wide. The truth is no match for them. Now we have the Resistance — Resisting democracy, our elections.
Or in Hillary’s words, campaigning:
“To say you won’t respect the results of the election, that is a direct threat to our democracy,” Clinton told a rally at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte. “The peaceful transfer of power is one of the things that makes America America. ”
“And look, some people are sore losers, and we just got to keep going,” she added. [CNBC]
Remember that 2 weeks out from the 2016 election, in October, the State of the Nation project gave Hillary a 95% chance of winning. Thus, Hillary lectured on election results.
At the third debate, 20 days from the election:
(WaPo) Clinton labeled Trump as Putin’s “puppet” — prompting Trump to snap back, “You’re the puppet!” — while Trump charged that Putin had “outsmarted and outplayed” her when she was secretary of state.
Words that are eerily surreal now, with what we know. That “greatness” is waning.
But, in fact, she had been at peace with Trump at no time during the campaign, even as an opponent. No, she was virtually at war with him, busying herself with framing up some fraudulent conspiracy of Russia and Trump colluding against her. Now, actually, doesn’t that sound more like some delusional paranoia — whether she was a candidate or not?
I’m surprised Hillary didn’t think Obama was conspiring, too, against her because he said in the Oval Office that no one can rig our elections. Oops, that stole her future thunder.
On the heels of her getting “cleared” by Comey, she commenced a scandal of unspeakable proportions connecting Trump to the Russia meddling campaign. Right, when she was bitching against Donald for not being willing to accept the elction results, she was already neck deep in creating a conspiracy plot against him and erecting an insurance policy in the event of a Trump victory. So as she stood on that stage, and ridiculed Trump, she was well aware they had created this fraudulent collusion theory, intermingling Trump with the Russia meddling. But that in fact they had all gone to great lengths to do that while even Deep State had spied on him. She knew that too, while standing there.
Yet only a few months before that she was waist deep in her own email cabal entailing four years that had many legs since. Then the faux investigation that had taken place with the explicit purpose of clearing her of any wrongdoing. Yes, to stand right there and be aware of all that while charging Trump for merely questioning the election process or being skeptical about the end results. (how close to the head of the nail was he?)
In retrospect, who was right about all of it? Who was wrong? Who lied all the way through it? Who had invested in every underhanded, illegal thing one could do to defeat the other — with the added complicit help of all the intelligence and a sitting president to do it?
That all should bother us now. It should make Hillary look even sillier now. Yet they still try to keep this charade of Russia collusion alive, and/or that there was some “obstruction of justice” by Trump in this fraud investigation perpetrated on him. That they could keep this phony charade up for over 3 years, having all levels of our government cooperating in it. Folks, this is a high water mark for as bad as government could get. I can think of nothing worse than this happening. But still it goes on.
Most of the reason it does continue is because of the many willing dupes who have all carried it this far. And because of MS media who desperately and intentionally propelled it. Of course this is the greatest scandal that ever occurred in our Republic, all at the willing hands of the sinister players. Let’s hope that record is never broken.
The Deniers of Democracy are still out there willfully denying results of the election, in a perpetual state of Resistance. It is a travesty of justice too. As Hillary and her accomplices have done everything to avert and obstruct justice all along, no one stopped them.
But the willing dupes are still out there. They are on social media, they are delivering the fake news reports. Even some of the corruption culprits who committed these high crimes are now employed as analysts in media. Clapper and Brennan give their opinions. Comey and his cohort McCabe are out insulting the intelligence of the public by telling their lies, defending their treanous acts and engaging now in sedition against the administration.
And Hillary, well she’s still out there, doing what she does, lying and trying to cover her multi-staged scandals against America. But she continues to have help, willing dupes who care nothing about the truth, or “What Happened.” Instead, Hillary lectures others that:
“You can run the best campaign, you can even become the nominee, and you can have the election stolen from you.”
Right Ring | Bullright
The House committee convened to charge AG Barr with Contempt of Congress proved how wrong this all is.
Instead, it only expands our existing Contempt For Congress and gaslights the public.
Jerry Nadler rushed into the contempt process in record breaking time, like he had planned it from the start. He also seemed to setup the process by making his demands impossible to comply with. He and all his staff attorneys would force AG Barr to pick between obeying the law or complying with Nadler’s subpoena. Which one to choose? Having made the choice, they set out to take him down using that as their reason.
Now they claimed to be on a collision course with a Constitutional crisis, justice, and impeachment. But Nadler set that course. Don’t blame Barr and Trump.
Democrats never were entitled to anything they desired. There are limits due to the justice system. So they attacked justice, in case you thought this was all about justice.
In fact, justice is about the last thing they have in mind. Their biggest enemy is justice. Conservatives knew it was never about justice. It was about covering a multilayered mountain of corruption under the surface. And keeping that from being exposed.
It was about obstructing justice by Democrats and abuse of power.
But why would Democrats be so outraged and triggered by Barr? Because he represents the greatest threat of anyone, as a devoted official to justice. He would do what Sessions never did, get involved in a real investigation. Actually, this is the first time in 2 years that we had a real AG. Trump functioned all this time technically without an AG.
We do know much of the reason for the counter intelligence investigation and the witch hunt was to create a smokescreen to prevent people from looking at the truth. Obama and his politicized administration hung the Russia collusion narrative around Trump while Obama did nothing at the time to respond to what Russia was doing.
They have been successfully propelling that narrative for 2 and half years, right into the next election cycle. Then they dumped the results of the investigation so it could poison democracy — be politicized and weaponized by Democrats — all over again. It was their politicization of it from the beginning as a means to win an election, then undermine a legitimate Trump administration.
If Russia “attacked our democracy,” then Democrats weaponized that attack the way even Russia could never do, against the country. So I have an idea to help them out.
Since Democrats are so outraged by Russia meddling in our election — “attacking our democracy” — and need to blame then hold someone accountable, I have the solution.
Investigate, blame and hold Obama accountable because:
1) he was president
2) he allowed it to happen for over 2 years
3) he weaponized it;
4) used it as a blanket to cover his administration’s scandals;
5) tried to blame someone who didn’t know it was going on;
6) then used the weaponized attack against his opponent and successor,
How about blaming Obama and holding him accountable because that’s who is responsible for it all? As if that was not enough, they weaponized that Russian meddling the way Russia never could, against America. After that, we can start the treason and sedition trials. So how about addressing the real problem and do something about it?
But no, they blame the guy who didn’t know about it and had nothing to do with it, just to keep everyone from uncovering or looking at Obama and Hillary’s: abuse of power, obstruction of justice, politicizing government, the political weaponizing of Russia’s meddling and undermining an election. Look no further than the duo of treason.
Right Ring | Bullright
This should bust the outrage meter on any caring, thinking, honest American in the country. The audacity takes the cake even for a Democrat Senator.
Here is a letter from Dianne Feinstein to DHS, regarding the death of an unaccompanied child who came here illegally. She incentivizes and sponsors this, and cartels too.
Maybe if you also cared about all the deaths and murders of innocent people in your own state — at the hands of illegals and sponsored by sanctuary cities — you might have some credibility on your concern. If only you cared about American citizens, too!
But lawless, borderless agendas are more important to you than the citizens of this country. Then you refuse to call it a crisis, along with the money for the wall.
What really concerns and scares me is what “dogma is living loudly” in you and your borderless caucus of lawlessness. Extremely concerned. That should frighten everyone with a working brain and ears to hear. You defy your oath and the Constitution.
How dare Dianne Feinstein object after pushing the Democrats’ borderless agenda. Yet she will turn the hearing into an emotional bash-fest blaming honorable, caring DHS people.
Right Ring | Bullright
Wouldn’t it be amazing if all these snakes in the Circus of Corruption came back around to asking for a pardon from Trump? Wouldn’t that be special? It would be ironic.
Imagine Comey and McCabe making the case for a pardon?
In fact, that is probably what Democrats would have planned if they won the White House. It would be Pardongate. They could issue them like candy.
All the people who took part in the coup and sedition would be on a list. Democrats could add it to their campaign platform. The convention would not be complete without turning them into heroes.
Of course if they did win, their first order of business would be going after the Trump administration and everyone connected to it. No doubt about that.
I guess that is our choice in 2020, to continue Democrats’ abortion of justice or not.
Right Ring | Bullright
Some of you are not going to believe me but I, yes I, really love all this modern technology. Especially the high speed stuff. I mean it is about all I can ask for and handle.
Still I drudge on, as best a bullfrog can, abreast of it all. (Satire)
Take today for instance. I had to resort to the big Bull machine. It’s reserved for only the biggest jobs. It was shaping up to be a number ten day for it. This morning when I saw there was a particularly heavy cloud of crap hanging low, I knew it would be a job.
So I went out to the annex pad to fire up the beast. It hadn’t run in a while and needed priming but she fired right up. I cranked her up to about full throttle. It was sure going to be a workout for the girl but it had to be done. I had a task.
I got all my high-techy data ready and started feeding it in small doses. You wouldn’t think I keep that much data around here but it’s just for such emergencies. I had a question that’s been haunting me, going back many months. It stumped me.
With all this BS that’s floating though the air since President Trump took office, I was looking for one specific common denominator in it all, if there was such a thing. You know, the media can pump it out thick and heavy 24/7. After a few hours of hardly being able to see in front of me, suddenly it started to clear little by little. Was there some common denominator to all these huge problems, and then what in the hell was it?
Well, I got up to full speed and then dumped the algorithm detector in the hopper to process the junk. Within a few hours, some good news. It spit out an answer. Just one.
Guess what? I found the common root all right. Seemed like a huge coincidence at first. It was none other than Hillary Clinton. Should have figured. Well, you know analytics don’t lie. Bessy Bull is always right. I cross-checked my data and no doubt about it, the common thread is Hillary. She’s in everything like DNA.
Funny part was, back there in July 2016, she was pretty thick in investigation and chaos. She had all that scandal stuff oozing from her pores. Then that fire cracker James Comey up and announced she is cleared on all that. If you could’ve seen my OJ face. Stuff dating back to 2009 when she set up that stinking server. Like they were in a big hurry.
So all her aids and everyone, nothing! They are still looking for some of the data and emails MIA out there. Whew-hoo what a mess that was. She got through even after Bubba Bill had a meeting on the tarmac with Loretta Lynch. Anthony Weiner did a side show. But she got the green light after July 4th for herself and her campaign.
Now here is the strangest part. After going through all that – and all those denials through the media about it for years – she turned around and did the weirdest thing imaginable. She swung from that messy ordeal right into creating an even bigger scandal, if that was possible. She was probably working on it even before she got off the first. On the heels of almost going down for it, she busted ground on another new whopper. It would dwarf even her last one. It was huge, for all the marbles. She even used the same contacts.
On this one, she sucked the DNC into it, hired lawyers for front men to do her dirtier work, then they contracted with Fusion GPS, who pulled Steele into it. Man, can she create a scandal? She might have sucked the whole Obama administration into the vortex. Now I’m not saying Obamafiles didn’t already have a head start, and their very own scandal brewing before that. But they joined up forces for this giant “Crossfire Hurricane.”
Sort of makes some sense in a real sinister way. But no Kansas, no Toto, no Dorothy.
I’ll tell you the truth, I never saw a storm cooked up like that before. Then it just got worse as time went on. But oh, it was Hillary that was in the nucleus of the whole thing. Her money, her people, her contacts and agenda. It became her baby even if it was Obama’s illegitimate child too. The whole thing was crazy and got crazier when the FISA requests flew and surveillance went all over — from NY to London to Moscow and to Australia and Spain. And back to Washington. Then came the dirty dossier that got peddled about all over. Even John McCain had his hands on that rag. Well, whatever they were cooking up was big; man was it big. They pulled everyone in intelligence into it and then media seemed like a willing accomplice. You know the wink and nod thing in the swamp.
Only months before all that, Hillary had been down in the bog herself, mired in corruption and pay to play influence. Who knew what else laid under it all? That was then.
When Trump took office, it continued hot and heavy. That crooked Comey just had to get fired for misbehaving all over the place. The swamp didn’t like that. Maybe it was the cord that let loose the whole unraveling when it came out. His deputy, then all these big shots in FBI were caught doing the same influence maneuvers they were supposed to be investigating. Comey squealed for a Special Counsel and swamp-masters appointed one.
The IG was sniffing around by then, too, and exposed some of the Deep State operators. But there was more, even more than he could handle. So Horowitz had to crank up another investigation just to satisfy the swampwatchers, gaining in number. The stench was awful.
This has all gone on like autopilot getting swampier as time went on. The AG was forbidden from touching it. It’s like it had a mind of it’s own and nothing could stop it. It only got bigger by nature. Democrats in Congress backed up the Deep State, whatever they said. Rumors flew and all they talked about was “Russia collusion.” It was everywhere.
But sure enough, in the background that no one wanted to talk about, how it all got started, was that Chardonnay-guzzling Hillary Clinton, smack in the middle of it all. But quiet as a mouse. Until even she started yapping about her still lost election and the big investigation. Yep that’s a good one, when you can start the whole thing then jump in to complain about it. She traveled around hawking a book “What Happened?” giving her opinions on everything. She fired off op-eds to make her finer points. She was all over the world, licking her wounds in public, while it was Trump who was suffering from constant attacks. Names and accusations flew like treason or agent of Russia. But not at Clintons, who had all the swampy traitorous connections. No one cared about all that or what they had done.
Pond and swamp-watchers like me sat there seeing all this stuff. No one paid attention to the source of it all or the real villains in the swamp. The common denominator was ignored. No, instead all those Leeches were out selling books, doing roadshows. Actually, Comey, McCabe, Hillary, Obama, all had big paydays as the swamp oozed on, claiming more and more turf. On top of it all, the whole lot of them sat back criticizing Trump about it all like Brennan, Clapper, Rhodes, and Hayden. That’s a nice band of dubious hecklers.
Then came hearings about it, but no one wanted to talk about the start of it all. No one talked about common-thread Hillary or the grand wizard, godfather Obama. In fact, we were all told she is irrelevant. She lost and she’s not president, so none of it matters. Except it is all here now, thanks to Hillary Clinton, Obama and their henchmen in tow.
As it seems to continue on and on, Hillary’s big thumbprints are still all over everything. When do we face this mutant DNA gene, responsible for so much corruption, and her sinister allies in the dark arts? Even chaos has limits. Folks can’t make this stuff up. And Hillary is right there in the middle of it all — living large on the swamp gas.
Right Ring | Bullright
Cannot a day go by without the Democrats getting slapped in the face and refusing to admit it? Apparently not. They are the Dumbocrats.
Case in point: hearings on AG Barr and a mysterious letter about Barr’s memo on the release of the Mueller Report. Mueller took issue with Barr’s debut and coverage of it.
First item up, William Barr is the acting AG and is in charge of the report. But he released this entire report, painstakingly. How so? Except for redactions of legal procedure, he put out the entire report, also with the help of Mueller’s team.
When it was one of Hillary’s investigations, or a Democrat who was the subject, the report and conclusion was the definitive end of the entire matter. “The end.” And that is exactly what they said and what we were told. However, when Donald Trump is the subject, we see that investigation is never over. Investigation is supposed to go on indefinitely, in an infinite loop. It never ends.
Democrats want to resurrect the Independent Counsel statute. They’ve tried all along from protecting the Special Counsel — to save him — by legislation, to wanting the Special Counsel to report directly to Congress. In other words, since Barr came in to replace Sessions, they wanted to erase him out of the picture the same way Sessions was recused. But Barr would not recuse or step aside. So they are left to try to do it another way — any way they can — to put Congress in the driver seat of the investigation.
Barr as AG is the boss of the Special Counsel. It is not the other way around. Even Mueller does not seem to understand this. Strange that Mueller could have been employed under the Justice Department for 2 years and not understood this chain of command.
So when the Special Counsel investigation ends that is just a mile marker for yet another stage of the never-ending investigation to begin. There is no finality in a “report” or the end of an investigation. It must have no end.
The Russian interference could be grounds for an investigation, but the idea of it actually being an investigation about Trump is a complete ruse. Trump is all they really care about. It was an investigation on Trump masquerading as a Russia interference investigation.
Back up. If it should be about anyone, then it should be about Obama and what he did to prevent the Russia interference of an election. Actually, Obama mocked the idea that a foreign power or government could influence our elections, right from the White House podium. And he had already promised Russia more flexibility in his second term.
If there is to be a knee-jerk comparison with Watergate, then the appropriate comparison of Obama to Nixon should be made. Obama was the one in office at the time. His actions need to be the subject – abuse of power, weaponizing government. What did he know and when did he know it? And what did he do about it and or why not?
We went through over five years hearing there were no illegalities to anything Hillary did. That the investigation definitively ended it and cleared her of any wrongdoing. Case closed. There is no crimes or criminal conduct to talk about. Sure!
But now the Democrats can see a crime behind every action. Not just any crime but high crimes. Obstruction of Justice and treason were on the table for 2 and a half years along with conspiracy — the darkest kind — to commit crimes against the country. Four or five investigations about Trump are not enough?
How about all the unmasking of information under Obama? Remember Obama flowing information between 17 intelligence agencies? Well, then there is Mueller spinning off several investigations into Trump out there to live on. The same M/O. Where was the concern for what Hillary and Obama did? There should be lots of ongoing cases out there.
Can we even measure the overkill and exaggeration at this point? No. How many calls for people to resign? Weeks in office and Dems demand they resign. How many calls for impeachment? Now threats to impeach Barr if he refuses to resign. Wolf Blitzer was outraged that people acted as if Trump is a victim here. Well, because he is!
In the Senate hearing, Barr described Mueller’s letter as “a bit snitty.” Right on! When asked if Congress could have the notes taken on the phone call between he and Mueller, Barr said “No.” Two words that will now memorialize AG Barr in my mind.
Right Ring | Bullright
The Democrats are so crazy now that they don’t know what fate awaits them. And maybe they don’t care either. They’re so captive to hatred they think everyone is.
They’ve worn out the language, impeachment is all that is left. They can’t show that they were bluffing. They want to be taken seriously. So they have guys like Ted Lieu and Adam Schiff and Jerry Nadler out to score political points, to do the dirty work.
Boy are they about to score some points. Only they don’t know or understand the people. They’ve been so disconnected from the people so long that they could not know.
These Democrat hacks are all dug in on their partisan turf and they’ve exhausted all their veiled threats and now it is time for action. That is the part the people will pay attention to… the actions. When they pull the trigger, they actually believe all the people will be right there with them, but they won’t be.
See, the people never saw the cause for impeachment or the phony investigations from the beginning. Only Dems never figured that out. They assumed people would follow them.
I’ve heard the callers on CSPAN lines. They aren’t all with the Democrats. And Dems are not making a great case for what they are doing. Only that they have had these scorched earth plans all along and they are determined to carry it out. Tom Steyer’s apostles.
At that point people are going to say, “wait a minute!” They’ll think with all the big problems we have and a broken southern border with a broken Congress that won’t do anything about it; with all our critical issues right now; and “this is what your number one priorities are? Count me out!” Then they will think: “I’m not going to be a party to it and you aren’t going to use my sacred vote to do it.”
Now have I got the people figured or what? I could always be wrong but I really don’t think so. I bet people will see all this as a miscarriage or misapplication of justice, and turn tail saying “this is not our agenda.” They’ll think “we the people actually do have a full agenda we voted for. Where is that, what happened to it?”
I think it is about to get pretty interesting and the people do have a last word. If this is what government wants to spend all their time and our resources on, it is insulting. The people also want to hear the other side of the story. Up until now it has been one sided. And the other side of it has all the juicy real stuff people care about. They want to hear it, and when they do…..this impeachment talk is going to look pretty silly.
Right Ring | Bullright
Actually, it would be much harder to name who Obama did not spy on.
Gateway Pundit has the story here:
Then check the Investors’ Business Daily (IBD) article on a summary of the Clinton ordeal. It is chilling what all went on but now it all seems to be confirmed, and even worse than we thought. “Russian Collusion: It Was Hillary Clinton All Along”
The problem of course always was would there be anybody in the DOJ or FBI willing to give it an honest look? Now with AG Barr there is at least a possibility of investigation.
Before that, no one could put odds on that happening. As IBD explains, it would seem that few in Congress were/are left to track it down. Only IG Horowitz is left to shed some light on it. Basically, Barr and what he can do is the only hope for any kind of justice.
No wonder Democrats and media were screaming when Barr mentioned spying in his testimony. But there can be no doubt it was illegal. Imagine if this was held to be legal?
On top of those bombshells, reporters asked Ben Rhodes about it. He denies knowledge saying there were strict firewalls in place. More like firewalls to prevent anyone finding out. He called investigating the origins of the Russia probe a huge “waste of time.”
Just for another chuckle: as Biden opened his presidentiaj run, he said what he is most proud of is that there was not a whisper of scandal in the Obama/Biden administration.
How about a bullhorn?
On September 17, 2018, Hillary went out to complain about her favorite topic.
“…republican Party, whose “increasing radicalism and irresponsibility” got the country to where it is and put Trump in the White House.”
“Trump and his cronies do so many despicable things that it can be hard to keep track,” Clinton writes. “I think that may be the point — to confound us, so it’s harder to keep our eye on the ball. The ball, of course, is protecting American democracy. As citizens, that’s our most important charge. And right now, our democracy is in crisis.”
Do try to keep up. We give it our best effort, despite her smokescreens. This is Hillary’s and Democrats’ resistance war on democracy, refusing to accept legitimate election results. Yet she complains about democracy in crisis? She wants to protect democracy?
She has done everything possible in the last 3 1/2 years to destroy democracy.
Now, after the Mueller Report, she couldn’t wait to jump in as Hypocrite of The US — HOTUS –- and self-anointed flame thrower of the Left.
Beginning not the end — media event.
Special counsel Robert Mueller’s report is only the beginning of a reckoning on election meddling, not the end, and “raises some serious questions,” Hillary Clinton said Tuesday.
If elected officials believe that he did [commit high crimes and misdemeanors] “then I think it is the obligation of Congress to put forward the articles of impeachment,” Clinton said at a … NYC Time 100 Summit, where she called for the full, unredacted report to be released.
Clinton also said the Department of Justice’s stance that a sitting president can’t be indicted benefited Trump.
“I think there’s enough there that any other person who had engaged in those acts would certainly have been indicted,” she said.
I think everything points to you, Hillary. How can you deny that? She is guilty of everything they were trying to hang and frame on Trump, and more.
Then she penned a WaPo op-ed of advice on how to respond.
“But it [Mueller Report] is a road map. It’s up to members of both parties to see where that road map leads — to the eventual filing of articles of impeachment, or not. Either way, the nation’s interests will be best served by putting party and political considerations aside and being deliberate, fair and fearless.”
She seems to think revenge is best served hot. There’s the “road map” thing again. Honk if you saw that one coming. It sure is getting a lot of mileage with Democrats. That’s the yellow brick road to impeachment, or whatever you want to see it as. Fair?
“Second, Congress should hold substantive hearings that build on the Mueller report and fill in its gaps, not jump straight to an up-or-down vote on impeachment. In 1998, the Republican-led House rushed to judgment. That was a mistake then and would be a mistake now.”
So keep building your Tower of Babel. Keep ripping and tearing at anything you can.
“Third, Congress can’t forget that the issue today is not just the president’s possible obstruction of justice — it’s also our national security. After 9/11, Congress established an independent, bipartisan commission to recommend steps that would help guard against future attacks. We need a similar commission today to help protect our elections. This is necessary because the president of the United States has proved himself unwilling to defend our nation from a clear and present danger.
It was just reported that Trump’s recently departed secretary of homeland security tried to prioritize election security because of concerns about continued interference in 2020 and was told by the acting White House chief of staff not to bring it up in front of the president. This is the latest example of an administration that refuses to take even the most minimal, common-sense steps to prevent future attacks and counter ongoing threats to our nation.” …/
”It’s critical to remind the American people that Democrats are in the solutions business and can walk and chew gum at the same time.”
We need to protect our elections from you. Your five-alarm fire no one heard.
Does she have some nerve? Lecturing Trump on failures to keep the country safe when Obama was AWOL on all of it. She dithered in the wings. Obama was the president when all this Russia meddling , and Russianeering, went on. Solutions, don’t make me laugh.
Oh, she was a part of it. She and Obama thought they could tie their Russia problem around Trump’s neck and that would be that. Now she wants another commission? How about instead of that, we look into what Hillary, her campaign and the maestro of dark arts, Barry, did about the Russia meddling problem as it happened?
Then look at what his administration officials did to assail the problem. Of course then we will see what Obama’s administration did against Trump – and didn’t do against Russia. Something never done before, aiming the entire intelligence apparatus on Trump.
“We have to get this right. The Mueller report isn’t just a reckoning about our recent history; it’s also a warning about the future. Unless checked, the Russians will interfere again in 2020, and possibly other adversaries, such as China or North Korea, will as well. This is an urgent threat. Nobody but Americans should be able to decide America’s future. And, unless he’s held accountable, the president may show even more disregard for the laws of the land and the obligations of his office.”
Beaming from her mount hypocrisy. Get it right, when they made all but certain people, including media, had gotten it all wrong until now? Get the injustice right?
A reckoning but she doesn’t want the real truth out. She wants a complete cover up of what she and Obama did to try to undermine our election. Russia couldn’t do what Hillary did. Maybe they should have worried about the Russians instead of trying to use them as hand towels for their plot? Urgent, it is urgent now? Partners in crime.
Right, no one but Americans should decide our elections. And we did! But you couldn’t accept the results. Your plan fell short. So then came the sedition of you and your Deep State allies afterward. You had to keep all the pressure on Trump as a diversion.
Holding Trump “accountable,” for what, winning an election? He didn’t do that. And Americans decided the election not Russia or Putin. But nice try.
Disregard for the laws of the land? You can show no more disrespect or disregard for the law of the land than not accepting the election results. Let’s not even discuss your other careless disregard for laws of the land, your effort to circumvent them, and your egregious obstruction of justice. That is when justice officially died. It was already on its deathbed, but you gave it the last push.
Then you acted as if you were the victim all along, rather than chief offender of lady justice. Your husband on a tarmac meeting Loretta Lynch was yet another sinister highlight on your trail to guarantee that the injustice occurred.
Finally she lectures on:
“A crime was committed against all Americans, and all Americans should demand action and accountability. Our founders envisioned the danger we face today and designed a system to meet it.”
Trump committed no crime here. You did. And that system our founders designed is the electoral college, which you want to abolish. (because you lost an election) Does that make sense? But thanks for reminding us all how fortunate we are you lost the election, even especially with all the Deep State and Obama administration’s help. Oh, and thanks for the helpful impeachment primer. I guess that makes you the expert.
Democracy is under siege, but guess by whom? Do the letters HRC ring a bell?
Hillary slipped into the Deep State of Denial somewhere in 2016 and never returned, only briefly surfacing at opportune times to target her enemies. But her operation secure.
Right Ring | Bullright
I write in sympathy to your current predicament. I know you have an extreme lack of credibility and standing with the public. Or maybe you are still in denial? You offend them and they offend you. I know it upsets you.
I feel your pain; but I cannot validate it.
The problem is that it is not Trump’s fault. That must be hard for you to accept, too. Yet it is the truth. Just repeat the words: “our credibility deficit is not Trump’s fault.”
It was not Trump’s fault that before the 2016 election you jumped on the Hillary bandwagon, with no reservations. You were doing her bidding well before the primaries.
When the election did come, by then you had set the perception that she was the winner by all standards and could not lose. Trump had nothing to do with your willful bias. He was not whispering in your ear to give favorable treatment to Hillary, forcing you to do her cleanup and dirty work.
He did not tell you to make things up about him and his supporters just like you all did about Tea Parties. He didn’t choose all your negative coverage of himself and positive coverage for Hillary. That was not in his power or within his influence to do.
He didn’t make you into card-carrying members of the resistance. He didn’t tell you to brand his supporters as racists, bigots, or even domestic terrorists. But you implied they were dumb, uneducated grievance hustlers who were generations out of step with the times. (talk about projection)
We came to the party only to take our part. You came to blacklist us. Sure, you couldn’t quite get the job done, but you expected it to take a toll. To some degree it did. Though you couldn’t defeat or destroy us. After all, you had been trying more subtly to do that for years. But we were not going away. In fact, we were the original resistance. So you fully embraced the banner of resistance after the election. Trump did not make you do that. He only pointed it out. You demurred any criticism because that is the kind of people you are.
We don’t matter. When you ran the daily 24/7 hate Trump media for his first two years, hyping the resistance movement and impeachment, you dug in your heels of sedition. With every leak and anonymous source you could muster, you blazed an historical trail, aligning yourselves with a coup well under way from the first day of Trump’s presidency.
Yes, I can sympathize with your pain and agony of it all. Well, I can because we have felt that prejudice against us from the public for decades. Your part in that campaign against us has not gone unrecognized. We are well aware of it and your attitude against we the people. We know how you feel about the people and flyover country.
We know how you despise the people’s mindset… and their choice.
So when Donald Trump said some members of the mainstream media – not all — were enemies of the people, he was right. We already knew that. You just confirmed it. When you were offended by that comment, it was not our fault. You did it. When you tried to spin yourselves into victims of that remark, it fell on deaf ears because we have always been the real victims of your schemes.
We get to vote, and were determined to vote regardless what you thought of us. See, you get to cast your vote everyday, as the elitists you are. You want to control dialogue and you couldn’t. The conversation went on around you, even factoring in your heavy hand at the ballot. But you could not control the discussion or the election results. So I can really identify with how you must feel. We’ve felt that way for years and you never cared.
Yes, we all know exactly what it is like to be outcast by the public as troublemakers and crazies. But we were not looking to validate our victimhood. We didn’t have to. It is prima facie in any honest assessment. Along comes media now claiming to be the righteous victims of slander, smear or character assassination to vindicate their cause. It is dishonest. It is self-serving, it is agenda driven and, finally, it is very political.
Now you have laid the record bare for all to see. Only you want your trashed credibility back on a golden platter. That’s just not how any of this works.
Worse than all that, you have also lost credibility with the Left, your handlers and allies. You promised and built up their hopes that you would assist in taking down this president.
When the Mueller report came out and didn’t declare the collusion you promised, your radical base of consumers recoiled. Their hearts and trust were broken. So you have lost on both sides, with your enemies and your allies. Hurts, doesn’t it?
That should have taught you something. But it was your stubborn choices you made every step of the way that are to blame, not Trump. We didn’t destroy your credibility. You did that yourself. We only supplied the means. Remember reporters demanding apologies from Trump? By the way, did you ever apologize for the way you treated the Tea Parties? No, it’s all part of the long record now. It lives on to prove to anyone honestly looking.
You are the victims of your own bias and hatred. Thursday will only validate what we all knew. It will expose you for the liars you were all along. But Trump didn’t do it to you.
It might be time to take some stock and dust off that first amendment to see what is really in it. There is more there than your beloved freedom. And last I checked, you weren’t.
Right Ring | Bullright