Politicizing Bergdahl

This is as plausible as anything else that has happened under Obama. It goes something like the Bergdahl decision was leaked to prevent Obama from interfering with it.

Was Bergdahl’s Charge List Leaked to Avoid Obama’s Interference?

January 27, 2015 by Daniel Greenfield | FrontPage Magazine

Considering how much trouble Obama went to make Bowe Bergdahl’s Taliban trade into a high profile event, it seems likely that the White House would have shut down the charges if it had gotten a chance.

So instead the leak may have been a way of pre-empting the White House.

http://www.frontpagemag.com/2015/dgreenfield/was-bergdahls-charge-list-leaked-to-avoid-obamas-interference/

Like I said, it’s worth a shot. It’s already been held up for this long from somewhere. Maybe this is just the time that no more damage can actually be done to Obama — he’s already up to his neck in other criticism. What’s another dose of reality as he is letting scores more detainees out of Gitmo, for practically anything to almost anywhere?

Well, interfering or undoing the charges were probably a little too much for the public to stomach, though. Besides, he could always pardon him later. But it wouldn’t look especially good to undo it all now. That could be too obvious. He likes to do things the sneaky way.

Gitmo-gate in full swing

Under Pressure, Hagel Promises to Act on Guantánamo Transfers


By CHARLIE SAVAGE and HELENE COOPER MAY 29, 2014 | NYT

WASHINGTON — Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel, who is under pressure from within the Obama administration to step up his pace in approving the transfer of low-level Guantánamo Bay detainees, has told reporters that he would decide soon whether to accept a months-old offer to resettle six prisoners in Uruguay.

But Mr. Hagel, in his most expansive public comments about detainee transfers, acknowledged that he has been in no rush to sign off on them. He cited the burden and responsibility of being the one official who, under a legal obligation imposed by Congress, must personally determine that releasing a detainee makes sense.

“My name is going on that document. That’s a big responsibility,” Mr. Hagel said, adding: “What I’m doing is, I am taking my time. I owe that to the American people, to ensure that any decision I make is, in my mind, responsible.”

Mr. Hagel made his remarks in response to questions by a reporter accompanying him on a flight to Alaska late on Wednesday.

They came less than a week after Susan E. Rice, President Obama’s national security adviser, sent a three-page memo to Mr. Hagel requiring him to “provide an update on progress on detainee transfers every two weeks until further notice,” according to an official who read passages of the memo to a reporter.

Mr. Obama has sought to close the prison at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, since taking office in 2009. Congress gave the secretary of defense the final say over approving transfers. He must determine that a transfer is in the national-security interest and that steps have been taken to “substantially mitigate” the risk that a detainee could pose a future threat to the United States or its allies.

Ms. Rice’s May 24 memo includes a record of Mr. Obama’s guidance on how much risk to accept when transferring detainees, including saying that it is “not a zero-risk standard,” and that the risk must be balanced against the harm to the United States caused by the continued operation of the facility.

The memo is said to define “substantially mitigate” as meaning that “steps have been or will be taken that would materially lessen the risk that detainee, post transfer, will engage or re-engage in any terrorist or other hostile activity that specifically threatens the United States or U.S. persons or interests.”

There were no transfers of low-level detainees under Mr. Hagel’s predecessor, Leon E. Panetta, who ran the Pentagon from July 2011 to February 2013. But Mr. Hagel has approved 11 transfers of low-level detainees, plus another who served out a sentence. Just one of those — an Algerian repatriated in March — came this year. Several officials said that more than a dozen detainees are the subject of proposed deals, and that there are serious talks with specific countries about taking in several dozen more.

In an interview with NPR on Thursday, Mr. Obama reiterated his desire to close Guantánamo. “We cannot in good conscience maintain a system of indefinite detention in which individuals who have not been tried and convicted are held permanently in this legal limbo outside of this country,” he said. He made a similar comment in his speech at West Point the day before.

In one respect, Mr. Obama’s negative portrayal of indefinite detention clashed with a key aspect of the approach to closing Guantánamo that he has advocated: He wants to bring several dozen detainees — who are deemed too difficult to prosecute but too dangerous to release — to a prison inside the United States for continued detention without trial.

Mr. Obama also said he keeps “chipping away” at the problem. /…

More: New York Times

 

The “pressure” he’s under is from Obama, let’s be clear about that. And Susan Rice is right in there. All in an attempt to pander for votes. One might even wonder if the detainees vote or something?

So he’s been hard at work on this release program, demanding reports every 2 weeks, but on the VA he was completely AWOL and ignorant about the corruption or scandal. No wonder, all his attention is on securing the release of terrorists from Gitmo. It is no surprise all his staff are involved, too. ‘All hands on deck’. But the massive VA-gate, not so much.

Concern now is that Obama intends to empty Guatanamo in months. He’s right up to speed and briefed on that. The US is what’s under pressure.

Then, right on the heels of his West Point speech, up pops the trade of one questionable prisoner of the Taliban for 5 upper echelons of the Taliban. (not 3 or 4, but 5) You guessed it, sounds like a deal US couldn’t refuse.

And right on cue, out pops Susan “the video” Rice, talking points in hand, saying Bergdahl “served with honor and distinction.” I wonder what the next deal will be, since we are out of our prisoners held by the enemy to negotiate.

Weasel Zippers

He didn’t tell Congress about the Bergdahl trade beforehand, because he knew some members opposed making a deal which had been on the table for years. As we noted, the regime had previously assured everyone that no deal would go through without Congress being informed beforehand. So that was obviously another lie. At what point does Congress take back their Constitutional obligation, which Obama is eviscerating, right and left?

Part of the deal on the table had also been giving the Taliban a million dollars. Did Obama give them the money too?

RightRing | Bullright

Pat Dollard has scoop on Bergdahl fiasco

 

‘Ashamed To Be American’: Released U.S. Prisoner Bowe Bergdahl Is A Filthy, Anti-U.S. Deserter And Traitor Who Deserves To Be Dead, Father A Jihadi

This guy sounds like he’s right up Obama’s alley. His dad is a jihadi, complete with jihadi beard, as anyone who is “working to free all Guantanmo prisoners” is a jihadi, defacto at least, since we all know many-to-most of them will return to the battlefield. Oh, and let’s not ignore the terrorist threat against the U.S. he also makes in the tweet “God will repay for the death of every Afghan child.” This whole story is horrifically fishy and we’re going to investigate further. And the punishment for desertion is death, btw.
More>

http://patdollard.com/2014/05/ashamed-to-be-american-is-released-u-s-prisoner-berghdal-a-filthy-deserter-and-traitor-who-deserves-to-be-dead/

 

We heard that he is having a hard time understanding and speaking English. Really? There is a video from Bowe in December 2010, where he was speaking perfect English in a plea to release him and other prisoners in Gitmo and Bagram, Afghanistan. He denounced the long war and those that died on both sides. Yea, hard time speaking English all right. Sailboats, motorcycles and family were among the things he missed.

But it was perfect timing to a President who needed another photo-op at the end of a hard week. What about those who died in action while looking for him? Just the type of prisoner Dems would like. Something is pretty fishy with all of it.