Stop the BS…

Obama: ‘a travel ban is less effective’ than asking people if they have Ebola taking their temperature

Pat Dollard | Oct 17, 2014

AFRICAN OBAMA: I don’t have a philosophical objection, necessarily, to a travel ban if that is the thing that is going to keep the American people safe. The problem is that ? in all the discussions that I’ve had thus far with experts in the field, experts in infectious disease… a travel ban is less effective than the measures that we are currently instituting…

If we institute a travel ban instead of the protocols that we’ve put in place now, history shows that there is a likelihood of increased avoidance. People do not readily disclose their information. They may engage in something called broken travel – essentially breaking up their trip so they can hide the fact that they have been to one of these countries where there is a disease in place. As a result we may end up getting less information about who has the disease, they are less likely to get treated properly, screened properly, quarantined properly and as a consequence we could end up having more cases rather than less.

The lame campaign of excuses continues.

So how bad is Ebola really?
It’s so toxic that Obama cannot even handle the issue himself. He needs an Ebola handler.

Amid Assurances on Ebola, Obama Is Said to Seethe

WASHINGTON — Beneath the calming reassurance that President Obama has repeatedly offered during the Ebola crisis, there is a deepening frustration, even anger, with how the government has handled key elements of the response.

Those frustrations spilled over when Mr. Obama convened his top aides in the Cabinet room after canceling his schedule on Wednesday. Medical officials were providing information that later turned out to be wrong. Guidance to local health teams was not adequate. It was unclear which Ebola patients belonged in which threat categories.

“It’s not tight,” a visibly angry Mr. Obama said of the response, according to people briefed on the meeting. He told aides they needed to get ahead of events and demanded a more hands-on approach, particularly from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. “He was not satisfied with the response,” a senior official said.

Continue reading >

Abortion Statistics are Shockers, or not

These Shocking Abortion Statistics Might Be Hard To Believe

A society that fails to value the most innocent among it cannot be expected to respect life at any stage.
B. Christopher Agee — February 26, 2014 — Western Journalism

The population of Mississippi is about 60 percent white – just less than 1.8 million – compared to a black population of around 1.1 million, or about 37 percent of the population. Despite the fact that there are nearly twice as many white Mississippians than blacks, however, recent reports show a troubling trend regarding the state’s abortion statistics.

Almost 72 percent of parents who decide to murder their child in the womb in the state are black. More than 39,000 abortions ended the lives of black babies in Mississippi between 1995 and 2010, according to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention data. Comparatively, fewer than 15,000 white babies were killed in the same manner.

While a disproportionately high number of black mothers in the state make the heartbreaking decision to kill their children, this tragedy is hardly limited to the Magnolia State. As the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene recently indicated, more black children were aborted in the city than were given the opportunity to be born.

The disparity was pronounced, data shows, as 31,328 black babies were murdered, while just 24,758 were able to escape the inherent dangers of the womb.

Any child lost to the reprehensible act of abortion should outrage anyone who values the sanctity of life. The astounding impact this procedure has on the black community, however, is evidence of an unspeakable evil.

Unfortunately, this was precisely the outcome advocated by Margaret Sanger, founder of the most ubiquitous abortion provider in the nation: Planned Parenthood. Sanger’s blatant call for the extermination of black children left no question regarding her intentions. Decades later, the modern abortion industry is stealthily carrying out her plan by marketing the murderous act largely to unwed, pregnant black women.

Conservative Christian actress Patricia Heaton alluded to this realization in a recent pithy Twitter update.

Margaret Sanger gets her wish: http://t.co/BJeHQXtJmY

— Patricia Heaton (@PatriciaHeaton) February 22, 2014

While the abortion rate has cooled slightly in recent years, it is imperative for social conservatives to remain dedicated to the fight for life. A society that fails to value the most innocent among it cannot be expected to respect life at any stage.

Perhaps the violent culture of today’s inner city has roots in the deadly precedent set in the black community by rampant abortion.

http://www.westernjournalism.com/shocking-abortion-statistics-might-hard-believe/?utm_source=wysija&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=NewMainEmail

And so, after careful analysis, all seems to be going according to plan — pardon the pun — Planned Parenthood plan that is. How’s that for “progressive”? And how about Obama’s iconic word, “Forward”? “Lean forward”…or be pushed.

The “progressive” movement is obsessed with “saving the environment”, a lizard, a spotted owl, a habitat, eggs, a spawning ground for fish. But their agenda for legalized murder, slaughter of babies is called “choice”.

You know, the folks who advocate for something called “safe abortion services” — they call that “reproductive health”.

Look at the numbers: National Review

Big H/T to Pepp for the article.

RightRing | Bullright