The “I-word” rears it ugly head

It isn’t just the word but who is opposing Obama’s power abuse that really matters.

Johnathan Turley once again bashes the usurpation taking place under Obama.

(TPNN)Respected liberal George Washington University Law School Professor, Jonathan Turley, speaking regarding the House GOP’s lawsuit against Obama for unconstitutionally using executive orders, issued a chilling statement on Wednesday, saying that “this could be a historic moment.”

We’ve been having one giant historical moment after another since the Usurper-in-Chief entered office, then rammed his Obamacare through despite all the warnings. Or his Libya adventure. To his recent campaign minions meddling in elections around the world. Fortunately, the rest of the world wasn’t as stupid as America to fall for their plans.

Unfortunately , Turley didn’t use the past tense. We have changed. Obama has changed it. And finally Congress applauded his efforts. About the only thing he hasn’t done yet is abolish the term limits. At this point that might even get wide approval. They’ve gone along with everything else he’s done — again, past tense. The fact that a suit is even in the courts is only an afterthought. Not that it is a real challenge.

But the problem goes much deeper in that we have an unimpeachable president. We are only kidding ourselves that we don’t. Certainly that was never the founders’ or the framers’ plan. It’s no longer King George across the pond we have to worry about. History has already been changed. The only recourse left is through unwilling-to-act courts.(everyone knows that too) So the genie is already out of the bottle.


“Our system is changing, and this body [Congress] is the one branch that must act, if we are to reverse those changes,” Turley urged.

Turley said that there is a new model of government emerging, one in which our Founding Fathers thoroughly rejected, and pointed out that when Obama announced his unconstitutional dictatorial powers, Democrats in Congress cheered him on.

“A dominant presidency has occurred with very little opposition. Indeed, when President Obama pledged to circumvent Congress, he received rapturous applause from the very body that he was proposing to make practically irrelevent.”

Obama came in promising fundamental change. We got it in spades.

Crisis on Pennsylvania Ave.

My central question is this (pardon me if it is self-evident to some people) :

Is Obama trying to create a Constitutional crisis, then extort it for gain?

It is the M-O of organizers to use or create friction and dispute, then take advantage of it however they can. “Never let a crisis go to waste” is their motto, I think.

Look what he did with the Obamcare, fast and furious, the fiscal mess, the fiscal crisis, and the sequestration and fallout, still unfolding.

Now with simultaneous scandals gripping every branch of government, and most departments of this administration, isn’t it hard to label it mere “coincidence”? What would they be doing if not causing scandals? They sure do set up quite the show. Does it all set the stage Constitutional crisis?

Extreme Irony along the way:

The IRS wants you to list every book you read, and name the people who influenced you and their political philosophy… etc, etc, etc. Yet at a congressional hearing, the same IRS employees can not answer one question and plead the fifth amendment protection. What’s wrong with that picture? It appears they were granted an exemption too.

Obama’s Constitutional Chaos

Its now clear Obama is going from place to place causing Constitutional standoffs or crises. Anyone can guess why but there is no doubt that is what he and they are doing. I have a new word for it, a chaosathon.

Eric Holder complains about a Constitutional crisis on the horizon, while actually causing one intentionally. You don’t get to have it both ways – being the cause and somehow the victim. That’s like starting a fire and then screaming “FIRE!”. He lies about the program. Then months later fails to comply with subpoenas and congressional oversight necessary to investigate it.

But it’s much the same thing he did with Fast and Furious itself. He had the program under his DoJ, then demands credit for shutting it down – never mind that the failed program should not have been operating to begin with. But he brags ending it is an achievement. Now he runs around warning people they’re causing a Constitutional crisis or standoff, while his defiance causes Constitutional chaos. It is almost nutty; but it’s the same M-O Obama uses.

Holder sues states for trying to enforce laws and control illegal immigration on their borders, while he refuses to enforce laws and fails to defend the border. Then he withholds resources so the state cannot do the basic duties of enforcing the law, and stops their 287b resources. Next Holder will probably complain about the problem this dysfunction is causing. It’s only par for their course. Cause a problem, or make it inextricably worse, then complain about the problem.

Notice a pattern?
Obama has shutdown the Fast and Furious inquiry using executive privilege.

Obama uses executive order to circumvent immigration law and usurp Congressional authority in one sweep.

Janet Napoletana admits it lacks congressional authority on immigration and that this is causing yet another Constituional crisis. Sound the alarm. Then blame congress for not adressing the problem, which they are lighting a fire under.

The problem, of course, is in Obama’s and Holder’s oath of office. They swore to uphold the Constitution — not their whacky ideology.(Alynski take a bow) We are a nation of laws not men and dictators. But now we are a nation under a king.

It is as if he were erasing the Declaration of Independence. He not only chooses what laws he will or will not enforce, he is creating scads of new laws burdensome and disagreeable to the people. Does any of this sound familiar? It should, just like the list in the Declaration. Remember “let the facts be submitted to a candid world”?

Just for openers:

He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.

He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.

So he is well on his way.

Illegal mmigration follows the same formula: break the laws, throw the system into chaos, and then complain “the system is broken”. See a pattern? So go out and rob stores and then complain about robberies. Or, like I said, start a fire and then complain there’s a fire.
His war in Lybia.
Fast and Furious
Illegal Immigration
The national debt
No budget for 3 years
Filing suits against states
Attacking the Supreme Court at his State of the Union.
He tells Congress what it should do to keep him happy.
Dealing with enemy combatants and such.
On every issue he touches he starts a Constitutional problem.
Then blame others for the problems

He’s the Sultan of Constitutional Chaos