The Prose Of Election Politics

It could be time for a national detox program. We’ve done our best to talk Democrats out of a severe anti-reality state they have been locked into. But we had no luck, they refuse to be rational. Now the only question is will they also refuse rational treatment?

So what does it mean, all the things Dems said and ran on in the course of campaigning? Well, it signals that they have not found the bottom of the barrel yet. But they tried.

Now we will go from election politics to antics. The antics of radical activism in the face of losing is always better than admitting any loss. That can mean, and usually does, anything goes. We can expect the misery of their refusal to accept the prognosis and treatment protocol. Well, that is when things get ugly. They will want to determine and control that process when, in effect, they are the sick patient. There might be a standoff.

But through the 2022 midterm campaigns, Dems basically told people that “if you vote for Republicans everything is going to break.” The sky will fall; life or society will fall apart.

The bitter reality is that this idea is so hilarious. What is not broken now? Democrats did their damnedest to rip apart the fabric of America to reveal an ideological evil we haven’t seen before. Their entire idea was to tear the system apart, from the economy to the justice system to the national security of America and border. It’s been ugly and part of what drives Democrats is the resistance from rational people to accept their failed ideas.

Look at reality — and it isn’t pretty — they spent two years breaking anything and everything in the country: starting with 550 riots in 2020 to compromise civil society, and eventually culminating into what they’ve done to our education system. They did their best to squash our national energy policies that were benefiting the country, and even stomp out any dialogue about it. Then they turned their axe against the idea of public safety and our justice system. They put special emphasis on weaponizing a crime wave into a political assault on citizens. Criminals took notice. They attacked our economy with all the vigor they could muster. But in it all, it was really the American people they were attacking. We were the intended target.

So with all the damage in the wake of Democrats’ one-party reign over our country, they then said democracy was under assault by people who only wanted to restore a sense of normalcy. People who just wanted their basic liberty back, on the heels of shutdowns and lock downs. A pandemic that was weaponized against the people.  ‘No respite for them,‘ say tyrannical Democrats, who turned the people into their enemy.

Now the Democrats run on this thing called “saving democracy” while making veiled threats against anyone who doesn’t line up with that narrative. We were considered the enemy of the state. Parents at school board meetings became domestic terrorists. The Patriot Act should be rolled out on them hard. No mercy.

And Democrats watched the assault on freedom in Canada with great enthusiasm. If only they could crack down on us like Trudeau was doing up north. If only Dems could shut down organizing and speech the way he was doing. The plan was to criminalize freedom-loving patriots by turning them into a “threat” to the very democracy that patriots were trying to salvage from the hands of institutionalized radicalism. A twisted deception.

No, we said, the true threat is systemic radicalism controlling our system of governance. Save us from ourselves. As Pogo said, “we met the [real] enemy, and the enemy is us.” Or people that hate America anyway and will do anything to put it down, and then transform it into something we were never meant to be. That is the real threat to America.

What are Democrats anyway? With all the damage they’ve done and are still doing, it’s time for another term. The only descriptor for Democrats is: Disaster Deniers.

 

Meanwhile … democracy is on the ropes, under threat, at risk, on the ballot!

Right Ring | Bullright | 2022

Brilliant Mueller Takeaways

So it was a giant wind up before the delivery pitch Wednesday on the Mueller hearings. But in the end, what big thing did I learn? A few things.

Well, after a 2 and a half year investigation, it turns out they were investigating the wrong person all along. The Democrats agreed with Mueller at least 3 times that “it would be a crime” to do exactly what Hillary Clinton did. He said that would be a crime. Plus she could have been indicted immediately and there are no rules against it.

So now I am waiting to see and wondering why she has not been charged yet? They better get busy now with that investigation though. No time to waste, and we cannot allow crime(s) like that to stand. I expect the Democrats will be all over it the same way.

Another thing occurred to me: the only people who do know the whole ordeal about this investigation and the facts of it, from the beginning, would be Fox News viewers or a few very competent, resourceful people on the Internet with critical thinking skills.

That’s because the Democrats and media have not talked about any of those things. So there should be a whole bunch of people who did learn some things they didn’t know. Anyone who watches CNN or MSNBC for starters. They must have been shocked.

In other words, all that stuff Democrats called conspiracy theories. I do give media credit for doing such a job blocking that information from the public. It must have been very hard. Only enlightened people who have been watching Fox knew any of that.

I’ll be waiting, especially for the no-knock raids part on Hillary’s inner circle. I think media needs to stake out their homes. Any day now.

Right Ring | Bullright

Illegal perceptions and border paranoia

Yes, what a difference a few years makes. In March 2011, Janet Napolitano made her screed about What border problems? — paraphrasing the titan of mistruth.

Remember when she uttered

“There is a perception that the border is worse now than it ever has been. That is wrong. The border is better now than it ever has been,” she said.

And El Paso Mayor John Cook said:

“The lie about border cities being dangerous has been told so many times that people are starting to believe it, but we as border communities have to speak out.”

Then she closed her case, right in El Paso, with this:

Numbers are in the right direction and dramatically so,” she said.

Still, she stressed that she didn’t come to El Paso “to run a victory lap” and that there “is much work to do.” — NBC reported.

Numbers in the right direction? That now would seem almost like a Freudian slip. My my, those skyrocketing numbers — in the right direction — especially since comrade Zero began exercising his executive pen. Now another border agent is murdered, and the family is even denied access to the arraignment.

Then, Napolitano said:

The perception that the violence in Mexico has spilled over to bordering U.S. cities is “wrong again,” Napolitano said. Violent crime rates have remained flat or decreased in border communities in the Southwest, she said.

That was also the same time that they were withdrawing the National Guard that were to shore up the border. Now what do we know about that time frame? How does this fit in with what happened in the last couple years? “Alex, I’ll take perception for a 100,000”.

RightRing | Bullright

Shooting….Chicago park

12 people, including 3-year-old, shot at South Side park

By Peter Nickeas and Jeremy Gorner [Chicago]Tribune reporters

September 20, 2013

Twelve people, including a 3-year-old child, were shot at a Chicago park in the Back of the Yards neighborhood Thursday night, authorities said.

Ten adults and the 3-year-old were transported by Fire Department ambulances after in the attack in the 1800 block of West 51st Street in the Back of the Yards neighborhood, said Fire Department Deputy District Chief James Mungovan. A 12th victim was believed to have driven himself to Little Company of Mary Hospital in Evergreen Park, a source said, citing preliminary information.

A total of at least 11 people were shot, including the 3-year-old, who was shot in the face, according to a source.

The shootings appeared to have taken place on a basketball court on the 51st Street side of Cornell Square Park near Wood Street.

More: http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/breaking/chi-multiple-people-including-3yearold-shot-in-south-side-attack-20130919,0,352520.story

Let’s see if this makes it onto Obama’s radar or the mainstream news-a-rama.

18 shot in 4 hours in attacks across city

 

    Staff report [Chicago Tribune]

12:11 a.m. CDT, September 20, 2013

At least 18 people were shot, one fatally, in less than four hours in attacks in Chicago Thursday evening, police said.

In attack in Back of the Yards, 12 people, including a 3-year-old boy, were shot at Cornell Square Park, authorities said.

A 36-year-old man was shot near 77th Street and Sangamon Avenue about 6:56 p.m., said Chicago Police News Affairs Officer Daniel O’Brien. The man suffered multiple gunshot wounds to his upper body and was taken to John H. Stroger Jr. Hospital in critical condition.

The man was later declared dead, according to the Cook County medical examiner’s office. […/]

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/breaking/chi-chicago-shootings-violence-sept-19-to-20-4-shot-on-south-side-20130919,0,3683126.story