So the cat fight begins…. continues

Guess who’s talking and organizing in the White House over Hillary’s emailgate? No surprise Valerie Jarrett is at the center of acton, once again.

NY Post: Valerie Jarrett Leaked Hillary’s Private Email Use to Press

by Katie McHugh — 14 Mar 2015 | Brietbart

Vengeful Obama confidante Valerie Jarrett went through back channels to leak Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server to the press, an explosive new report reveals.

The New York Post‘s Edward Klein reports that a source familiar with Bill Clinton said that the former president told him: “The Obamas are out to get us any way they can.”

Jarrett blamed the Democratic party’s 2014 midterm losses on the Clintons’ insinuations that Obama’s unpopular policies, including executive amnesty for foreigners gobbling up American jobs, made the president an “albatross” around the reigning party’s neck.

Jarrett, Obama, and Obama’s wife greeted Hillary as a triumvirate of black liberals at the White House after Democrats got thrashed at the voting booth. Under the watchful eyes of his wife and closest senior advisor, Obama told Hillary, the former first lady of Arkansas, in no uncertain terms he would remain “neutral” in the 2016 election — signaling he would not, in fact, support the Clinton candidacy that the media call “inevitable.”

Ambitious Democrats are scheming to kneecap a Hillary candidacy before she declares she’s running.

More at Brietbart

It will surprise few here that I have a twist on that take. I don’t dispute what is happening. But wait, again Jarrett has been given wide berth. Who is she to be making the call for Dems on who should follow Obama — acting with impunity and no push back from anyone? She’s up to our necks in the Iran deal. She was no doubt heavily immersed in Benghazi and IRS scandals, and the EPA rules or environmental policy.

Now she is making the call for Obama’s successor, or so they plan. This unelected Chicago political operative came to DC with more power and influence than anyone else in Washington except Obama. And again, Bill Clinton declares who is out to get the Clintons. (first the Republican canard then Jarrett) Who would you rather believe if you were only given the two choices, Bill or Jarrett? I’d have to go with Bill. (bad as that is)

How far can EPA go?

 

From CFACT — Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow

Unlimited EPA?

Is there any limit to how far EPA can go?

EPA is promulgating new regulations at an astounding rate.  It is expanding its power by stretching environmental laws beyond the recognition of the legislators who adopted them.

When regulatory agencies enlarge their power, they distort our constitutional system of checks and balances.  When EPA moves beyond sound science and policy, it burdens our fundamental private property rights and distorts and slows our economy, killing jobs and stifling industry.  Sadly, the country receives no meaningful environmental benefits, despite the staggering costs imposed.

James Madison wrote in Federalist 48 that, “it will not be denied that power is of an encroaching nature and that it ought to be effectually restrained from passing the limits assigned to it.

The job of restraining government falls to the Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court recently heard oral arguments and will render decisions on matters which we hope will place EPA in check.

CFACT senior policy adviser Paul Driessen briefs us on what’s at stake at CFACT.org.

Paul and other legal scholars recently drafted two legal briefs which CFACT submitted to the Court.

It is time for the Supreme Court to do its job and as Madison told us, “restrain” EPA from “passing the limits assigned to it.”

For nature and people too,

Craig Rucker
Executive Director

CFACT.org

Organizing for [Obama] Action

With all the calls Democrats make to rein in Tea Parties’ activism, they ignore OFA.
Schumer is mum on that.

Rep. Schock Highlights Organizing for Action, a 501(c)4 Openly Working for Obama
June 2013

Having established that no significant campaign cash was flowing through these groups, Rep. Schock then pulled up the description of Organizing for Action, a 501(c)4 whose stated mission is to “support President Obama in achieving enactment of the national agenda Americans voted for on Election Day 2012.” OFA describes this agenda as including legislation on “gun violence prevention, sensible environmental policies to address climate change and immigration reform.” Despite the obvious political overtones, OFA’s work is considered within the proper realm of a 501(c)4 activity, i.e. promoting social welfare. /…

Democrats in the hearing argued that scrutiny is appropriate for any group engaged in political activity and applying for 501(c)4 status. They further suggested the conservative groups filed for 501(c)(4) status in order to hide their donor lists, implying these organizations were hiding large influxes of cash. In ‘response, Rep. Schock asked three Tea Party groups giving testimony to state their annual budgets.

More: www.breitbart.com

 

Have a little politics with your hypocrisy. “Political overtones” is a giant understatement.

The OFA staffers run president Obama’s twitter account, and sign tweets BO for Obama. Yet you can bet their tax-exempt status was never in question – nor will it be.

Here’s the script on the twitter account for Barack Obama

Barack Obama Verified account
@BarackObama
This account is run by Organizing for Action staff. Tweets from the President are signed -bo.
Washington, DC · barackobama.com

What is OFA?

“Organizing for Action is the grassroots movement built by millions of Americans to pass the agenda we voted for in 2012.”

It’s Obama’s personal campaign. No, no politics or political advocacy going on there.

Is IRS checking that Twitter feed and monitoring every tweet? They are probably too busy trying to get all the names, donors, copies of speeches, writing and reading material of Tea Party groups, and thinking up questions to ask them for pending 501 status. That’s what Schumer wants them to redouble their efforts on.

And try to name one part of government he hasn’t politicized as well.
Time to rename IRS, now Obama’s ‘Internal Revenge Service’.

RightRing | Bullright