Tag Archives: grand jury

Clinton investigation 2.0

by Bullright

FBI, grand jury on second investigation into Hillary’s political corruption, says former US attorney

March 10, 2016 | Bizpac Review

Department of Justice officials have impaneled a federal grand jury in the Hillary Clinton email case and FBI agents have launched a second, separate investigation on political corruption involving the former secretary of state’s official activities and the Clinton Foundation, a former U.S. attorney told The Daily Caller News Foundation.

Joseph E. diGenova, who served as U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia for four years, said Wednesday he believes the FBI is investigating two separate Clinton scandals.

“The Bureau has between 100 and 150 agents assigned to the case. They would not have that many people assigned to a classified information case,” he told The DCNF, addressing Clinton’s use of a private email server located at her New York home.

“Based on reports that agents are asking questions about the foundation, it seems to me to properly the subject is a second prong of the investigation,” he said.

The Department of State’s Inspector General (IG) subpoenaed documents from the Clinton Foundation last fall to determine if State Department policies had been influenced by foundation activities. The State IG asked for records held by the foundation and Huma Abedin, who for six months simultaneously worked for former Secretary Clinton and the Clinton Foundation.

More: http://www.bizpacreview.com/2016/03/10/fbi-grand-jury-on-second-investigation-into-hillarys-political-corruption-says-former-us-attorney-315315

So the Clinton inquiry came to a fork in the road, and took it. The question is can they now handle a two-pronged investigation, or two separate ones, when they haven’t shown much will to do the first one yet? So I hope the numbers and the second front are all a good sign they are serious. We know Hillary doesn’t take the “security review” seriously.

You can just shoot them

by Bullright

“When a person is intimidated by a black person, in this country, you can just pull out your gun and shoot them.”

What is very disconcerting is his hyperactive imagination.
How about that “license” to loot, not shoot, over anything you don’t like?

Or how about Planned Parenthood’s and abortion clinics’ license to kill? Silence.
They don’t even light a candle over that.

New terms for old protest

by Bullright

I saw an article today with the headline:

“Ferguson riots span 100 cities on second day” (splash page)

Protests against Ferguson decision grow across US
Though mostly peaceful, demonstrations grew coast to coast Tuesday, a day after the country learned Wilson won’t face charges.–AOL

Are we now calling riots mostly peaceful? Or, if these others were peaceful there is no reason to call them riots. Sound confusing? I’ll have to put that in my lexicon, ‘mostly peaceful riots’.

This from a protestor in Cleveland:

“The system wasn’t made to protect us,” said one of the protesters, 17-year-old Naesha Pierce. “To get justice, the people themselves have to be justice.”

Bad designing? I’m trying to dissect the last part. But If she is referring to the concept of self-government, it clearly has failed on them. Anarchy is sort of like that.

Talking about evolving terminology, maybe someone will think of a new term for looting, too? That sounds so last century.

In another report, two FBI agents were shot 5 miles from Ferguson. Though instantly they said that it was not “directly related” to the protests. How do they know that? How about this: a car is in the ditch off the highway, though it was not directly related to the 10 inches of snow on the road? No apparent connection. (don’t go conspiracy theorist now)

We’ve already heard reports that they found pipe bombs in a raid. But I guess we are too quick to jump to conclusions, that’s why they have to make those disclaimers all the time. Though media is quick to project spreading riots, aka demonstrations. Meanwhile, property owners are sacrificed to the expense of protestors. Fair tradeoff. Hmmm.

Also the demonstrators want to make rules for police officers. And they want them to wear name tags. So demonstrators wearing masks and those Guy Fawkes’ get-ups want name tags on cops. Maybe I should go slower, so not to jump to conclusions?

How about a pre-Thanksgiving laugh….for the road?

RightRing | Bullright