Are the 2016 numbers already in the bag?

At least someone thinks so and is spreading that message far and wide.
What hope is there for America, when this is set to go off in 2016?

Univision host: Hispanic vote to jump from 12 million to 16 million, will decide presidency

By Paul Bedard | May 20, 2015 | Washington Examiner

Jorge Ramos, the influential host of Univision’s Noticiero Univision, said the Latino vote will decide the 2016 presidential election and that Hispanics could see a reward for providing the margin of victory.

In an interview with Harvard University’s Institute of Politics following a speech to students, Ramos predicted that about 16 million Hispanics will go to the polls, likely to vote Democratic based on past trends.

More: http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/univision-host-hispanic-vote-to-jump-from-12-million-to-16-million-will-decide-presidency/article/2564781

Of course if it occurs once then it is considered a patent rule in all future elections, too. Look what happened with the precious black identity politics. Now they are pushing the female vote. And the Hispanic vote appears to be a done deal — at least according to them, with more of their election projection.

Speaking of deals, note the arrogance of Ramos about something in return. Like they haven’t been bought and paid for already as another voter bloc on the Democrat plantation roles. Identity politics on steroids. But then who else is even in that league? What is it?

While we are talking about trends, that Jorge Ramos has a few of them working. I know I blame MSM a lot for their crap coverage, but this guy blows them away in the arrogance department. He’s a one man band, a TV news anchor, journalist, left-wing activist and a lobbyist kind of all rolled into one. Not to mention pretty much a one-note Charley on illegal immigration. Now he appears to be an election consultant/expert/adviser/ambassador/advocate/diplomat/executive. He does it all. And if you want to talk to the Hispanic community, you gotta go through him.(WSJ calls him key to the voting bloc.) And we thought our mainstream-media model was bad.

One answer to Obama

We are now at a great crossroads, we’ve been here for a while. Now for all Obama’s criticism, rhetoric, and complaints about his favorite whipping post, Republicans, there is one response to it all. We need to hear it echoed from every rooftop to anything he says.

The answer to it all is “Obama, people can’t trust you”. They can’t trust him to enforce the laws now. He won’t enforce the laws we have, but he demands new law. Congress can’t trust him to enforce new legislation. You can’t trust him to uphoild anything, including his word. You can’t trust him to fix a problem.

He’s rewritten his own namesake law so many times, he’s declared others broken, he’s ignored others, he’s refused to enforce still others. And he rewrites what Congress passes to suit his fancy.

So he stands there complaining congress won’t fix something, or won’t send him something, or won’t work with him. The answer is “We can’t trust you, Obama.” There is no good faith or credit there, and the people don’t trust or believe him. That is the response he should get to anything he says or asks.

Now Obama says “we’ve actually got a humanitarian crisis on the border now”.

Is he proud because he caused it?

Crying over spilled borders — pretending to — Obama said:

We now have an actual humanitarian crisis on the border that only underscores the need to drop the politics and fix our immigration system once and for all. In recent weeks, we’ve seen a surge of unaccompanied children arrive at the border, brought here and to other countries by smugglers and traffickers.

Today, I sent a letter to congressional leaders asking that they work with me to address the urgent humanitarian challenge on the border, and support the immigration and Border Patrol agents who already apprehend and deport hundreds of thousands of undocumented immigrants every year. And understand, by the way, for the most part, this is not a situation where these children are slipping through. They’re being apprehended. But the problem is, is that our system is so broken, so unclear that folks don’t know what the rules are.

Why would they know what the “rules”– Law –is since he’s been playing legislator?

“We can’t trust you !”

“We can’t trust you !”

“We can’t trust you !”

And Congress can’t trust you !

From the Jackson Sun: “Obama’s strategy of division”

Divide and conquer sums up President Obama’s political strategy on immigration: Stop deportations. It will inflame conservatives and appease Latinos.

The more conservatives are angered, the less chance genuine reform will have in the House. And the more Latinos are appeased by the end of deportations, the more they will be drawn to the Democrats.

It’s as skillful a move as any ricochet shot in a pool hall. By widening the gap between Latinos and conservatives — through a deliberate refusal to enforce immigration laws — he hurts the country and helps his party.

The cornerstone of any Republican approach to immigration reform is to prevent a continuing influx of illegal immigrants from abroad even as those who have already arrived are, at least partially, assimilated. Republicans are generally willing to grant those here illegally the ability to work without fearing deportation. But they are not willing to concede a path to citizenship and voting.

All Republicans are concerned that any form of amnesty in the U.S. will only serve to catalyze a heavier flow of foreigners to come here illegally. The recent influx of unaccompanied children from Central America makes this tendency manifest.

The key question for Republicans has always been: Can we trust the administration to seal the border? More>

We know that answer….very well. Just repeat it.
RightRing | Bullright

First La Raza President

…or is it First La Raza resident of the Oval Office?

Okay, so it has come to this fiat law on immigration. Well, I suppose now we can say he’s the first La Raza president, since it’s one chunk of what they’ve been asking for, served up unconstitutionally. Another ornament to hang on the Obama tree.

See, we already had the first African American president, quite literally on that one. We’ve had the first woman president (that’s right, Barack again), we had the first gay president, and first LGBT president, we had the first union president, the first Socialist president and so on.  The list is long and they aren’t finished. By election every one of their favorite demographics will be on it. Or you could say the “first fruit-picker president” too, and that would mean as much as the Nobel Peace Prize he won – not for what he did but what he would do.

So now that we had the first cotton-pickin’ president etc, and everyone accepts it, can we finally move on please? For one thing, where he got the power to do this. He created it from whole cloth, just like so many titles and his Peace Prize. Its all fiction; we’re now living in The Land of Make Believe. Any day now the cloud is going to descend around him and he will declare himself The First President of the Universe. (to Bill Clinton’s objection) But is there any other title he would like? I mean what’s left for the second term he is demanding? Yea, he claims to deserve that despite his record, the same way Mr. Zero-experience deserved to be elected.

Let’s put his alternative reality aside for a moment. He saw Rubio coming up on his flank and said ‘gee, I’m going to create a fiat law and head him off.’ But “this is not politics”, he tells us.  Just like he tried to steal every other idea he thought might be popular – while needing to be the first. Hillary, unfortunately, was just one of many he climbed on the back of and stomped on the way up the ladder. HillaryCare is now “ObamaCare”. Bill Clinton thought he deserved the title of ‘first Black President’, ha ha, until Obama came along and made Billy into a racist. (that should teach him) 

We may have thought George Wshington was the greatest president…until Obama came along. (by his opinion)

So Rubio, look out. It doesn’t matter if you say you aren’t running, king Obama sees you as a threat so watch out. He had Petraeus installed where he could be no threat to the great one. We saw what they did to Sarah Palin. They are foaming at the mouth at Allen West and his popularity, ‘must destroy him’.  They just declared Newark Mayor, Cory Booker “dead” to them because he stepped out of line, off script. And we haven’t even seen the Democrats’ Convention yet. Notices are probably out: “anyone stepping out of line will be burned at the stake. We’ll take no prisoners.”

As he continues his vendetta across the nation, he will preach about civility in politics and changing the way Washington works. You can count on that lecture coming. And let’s not forget the weekly sermons on “fairness”. Did Democrat pols ever think their political futures would hinge on their mandatory support for one “Barack Obama”? Someone should have warned them. The bus is revving up and waiting for the next volunteer or example to the rest. “Stay on the plantation, or suffer the consequences. And no trespassing for Republicans.” He’ll have a tire with your name on it.

So La Raza enjoy your day in the sun, soak in all you can. Did you think this was about your agenda? Come on, really. (…then take a number by all the others) What’s next, maybe the gang vote?

Obama memo to Cory Booker: ‘I see dead people.’