Miss full accountability, “the buck stops with me”, Hillary Clinton testifies to say “what difference does it make?”
I know it’s still only January but that is the line of the year. And it took her four months just to say that.
Clinton: With all due respect, the fact is we had four dead Americans.
Johnson: I understand.
Clinton: Was it because of a protest or was it because of guys out for a walk one night who decided they’d go kill some Americans? What difference, at this point, does it make?
It is our job to figure out what happened and do everything we can to prevent it from ever happening again, Senator. Now, honestly, I will do my best to answer your questions about this. But the fact is that people were trying in real-time to get the best information….But, you know, to be clear, it is, from my perspective, less important today looking backwards as to why these militants decided they did it than to find them and bring them to justice, and then maybe we’ll figure out what was going on in the meantime.
Clinton: “What difference, at this point, does it make? ”
She also misconstrued the purpose. The point is even more about the response and reaction of our government and why. This is the way they argue by moving the point. We thought it was about our governments’ response and she twisted it to just the terrorist’s motives. Both are questionable.
Then use the four dead Americans to mitigate government’s culpability. (logic took a vaction) And she tried to trump terrorists’ motives by a goal to “bring them to justice” — which they haven’t. See how this game works? Argued in true Liberal BS.
“What difference does it make?” It makes a big difference. How could you prevent this in the future if you dismiss the facts as irrelevant? Does that sound anything like, “do everything we can to prevent it happening again”?
We hold this non-truth to be self-evident, what does it matter?
PS: and the media yawns and says what difference does it make?