Randomized thoughts: Labor Day postmortem election coverage

Since when is enforcing the law bad policy? It is. That shows where we are when someone gets beat up for standing up for the rule of law. Then they are called racists.

So somebody has to be the bad guy and enforce the law. When they do, they become the problem. Trump, police, border control, or Inspectors general. Even if FBI dared to enforce the law where Hillary or Obama are concerned, they would be ridiculed.

Border agents are told not to enforce the law. Baltimore and Ferguson showed officials making the conscious effort to stand down the police. In Benghazi, military got the message to stand down in response to a terrorist attack.

Hillary travels with the press now — or them with her. At least if the plane went down they would all be together in cause as in politics. But traveling with press in tow still does not equate to a press conference. She’s been traveling with the rich and famous, and the press wasn’t part of that. Now she will pretend that she is symbiotic with the press.

There is something ironic about seeing Hillary’s big new plane that says Stronger Together with the press loaded on board like baggage. Optics. “We will be flying at 30 thousand feet through plenty of cloud cover. There will be plenty of turbulence as long as I’m on board.”

The black vote, or African-American vote as they like to refer to it: Obama had a lock on that. And now Hillary — by virtue of running on his legacy — is supposed to have a lock on their vote. Why is she entitled to 90+ percent of the vote? No reason whatsoever.

Amazing that Blacks can support or vote in lockstep for Democrats. Of course, Democrats expect the same from Latinos or Hispanics, big labor organizers and unions. All aboard.

Where are all the disgruntled, protesting blacks from Chicago and elsewhere I’ve seen over the last few years? They made videos saying Obama did nothing for the black community. There’s a whole lot of anger in the black community against the establishment, too. Hillary is the face of establishment. But they are swinging for Hillary anyway?

Try that white America. When do all whites support the same Party or candidate by 90+ percent margins? So what is white America doing wrong?

The liberal spin machine cranks it up. Even Bernie is joining Biden, Obama, Kaine, Bubba to hit the campaign trail for Hillary. Now he asserts that Hillary is the face of their “political revolution.” Really? Hillary carries the banner for Wall Street, and her celebrity funders from Martha’s Vineyard and the Hamptons’ hedgefunders… and the people used and abused by special interests. Yep, she’s got it all. The corruption express hits the road.

RightRing | Bullright

Are the 2016 numbers already in the bag?

At least someone thinks so and is spreading that message far and wide.
What hope is there for America, when this is set to go off in 2016?

Univision host: Hispanic vote to jump from 12 million to 16 million, will decide presidency

By Paul Bedard | May 20, 2015 | Washington Examiner

Jorge Ramos, the influential host of Univision’s Noticiero Univision, said the Latino vote will decide the 2016 presidential election and that Hispanics could see a reward for providing the margin of victory.

In an interview with Harvard University’s Institute of Politics following a speech to students, Ramos predicted that about 16 million Hispanics will go to the polls, likely to vote Democratic based on past trends.

More: http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/univision-host-hispanic-vote-to-jump-from-12-million-to-16-million-will-decide-presidency/article/2564781

Of course if it occurs once then it is considered a patent rule in all future elections, too. Look what happened with the precious black identity politics. Now they are pushing the female vote. And the Hispanic vote appears to be a done deal — at least according to them, with more of their election projection.

Speaking of deals, note the arrogance of Ramos about something in return. Like they haven’t been bought and paid for already as another voter bloc on the Democrat plantation roles. Identity politics on steroids. But then who else is even in that league? What is it?

While we are talking about trends, that Jorge Ramos has a few of them working. I know I blame MSM a lot for their crap coverage, but this guy blows them away in the arrogance department. He’s a one man band, a TV news anchor, journalist, left-wing activist and a lobbyist kind of all rolled into one. Not to mention pretty much a one-note Charley on illegal immigration. Now he appears to be an election consultant/expert/adviser/ambassador/advocate/diplomat/executive. He does it all. And if you want to talk to the Hispanic community, you gotta go through him.(WSJ calls him key to the voting bloc.) And we thought our mainstream-media model was bad.

Murrieta the example

 

A NY Times article made sure to describe Murrieta as “middle-class conservative”.

“Nowhere have the Central American immigrants been met with such tremendous anger as they have here, in this middle-class conservative community about 90 miles southeast of Los Angeles.”

What difference does it make what type of city or town it is? But it says nothing about what type people the illegals are. Who knows? Isn’t it funny how that works? Suddenly the citizens of the community are scrutinized under a microscope instead of the problem.

And racism? It wouldn’t matter who or what nationality they were. But the fact is they are who they are. They could be Canadians, Costa Ricans, Argentineans or Brazilians.(by nationality not race) The same questions and problems would result. But they aren’t.

Murrieta already has a 25% Latino population. So don’t claim the racist crap. If they bussed in white transients from LA, and dumped them off, it would be the same problem and a similar reaction. Then to have the resources of the community left to deal with it is just crazy.

“We didn’t ask for this problem — it was just dumped at our doorstep,” said Mayor Alan Long, who has lived here most of his life and told residents he planned to send a “fat bill” to President Obama. “This is a nationwide problem, and little Murrieta has taken the lead.”

Why is it when they come here, or Mexicans already here, always refer to “our people”? Yet when anyone generalizes who they are, they complain about stereotyping their people. I see TV commercials by Latino organizations talking about expressing the voice and speaking up for “our people”. Really, what about speaking up for Americans? That seems to be frowned on.

A local resident objected saying:

“We came here because they are attacking our people, people just like us,” said Ana Larios, 42, a Mexican immigrant who moved to Murrieta with her children from Los Angeles nearly a decade ago. “I never knew people felt this way until now. It’s shocking and embarrassing.”

Funny, if she didn’t notice anything, it makes the case for the community. Ten years and she didn’t feel it because it isn’t there. Now she wants to imply some sort of racism after admitting that there is none.

I saw a sign somewhere: ‘justice not deportation’. Since when is deportation injustice?

Ref: http://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/04/us/influx-of-central-american-migrants-roils-murrieta-calif.html?smid=tw-share&_r=0

RightRing | Bullright