Who’s Sorry Now?

What an abortionist had to say about deciding to stop after doing them for years.

Live Action (read here)

Besides her pro-abortion philosophy, Aultman gives two other reasons why she became an abortionist:

“I also could make a lot more money doing abortions than I could make working in an emergency room. I enjoyed the technical challenges of the procedure and prided myself on being really good at what I did.”

More: https://www.liveaction.org/news/planned-parenthood-abortionist-ted-bundy/

So give her some credit for changing and stopping. But she did make a lot of money doing it and probably provided her a nice and comfortable lifestyle, until she did.

Then add this:

“I probably murdered more people than Ted Bundy or any of the mass murderers if you consider all the abortions that I did,” she says.

Consider that the abortionist and woman having an abortion may have the same economical motivations for their actions. I just never heard it put in such direct terms before. Well, I find it awfully hard not to make some deductions about that.

This opens a Pandora’s box in philosophical terms. You go to school to study medicine for the purposes of using it to fix people and save lives. Then you go to work using the same knowledge and talent to extinguish lives. How does the latter justify the former?

Should it take three scenarios to sound warning bells that something is wrong with this?

I’m not sure what to think of it all. Chew on that.

Abortion providers in their own words

Gosnell is only a symptom of the larger problem

Whether it is putting the baby in a jar of toxic fluids, or telling a woman to” flush it down the toilet” like waste, abortion providers are quick to espouse the solution. (remember Hitler and the final solution)

They make it sound as simple as pouring Drano into a clogged drain. That comes from people who could not care less about human life.

Babies drowned alive in toxic liquid

New, horrific discoveries in New York, Washington, D.C.
WND  (Listen to video at link)

A Pennsylvania jury will soon render a verdict on whether abortionist Dr. Kermit Gosnell murdered four babies who survived abortions as well as a woman who was one of his patients, but a new series of videos from Live Action suggest that Gosnell’s actions are not out of the mainstream.

Live Action President Lila Rose told WND her group has already released two videos showing abortion providers in New York City and Washington, D.C., explaining how they would do nothing to help a baby who survived an abortion to survive.

The 10-year Planned Parenthood adviser tells an undercover Live Action investigator that if she were to deliver her baby alive while at home between the stages in her two-day abortion, that she should just “flush it.” The female official also said that the woman definitely should not call a hospital because it wouldn’t help her since the abortion had already started. She further asserted that any surviving baby would die once it was submerged in a toxic solution inside a jar.

In Washington, Dr. Caesare Santanegelo admits that he is legally bound to help a baby who survived an abortion to stay alive – but that he would not. Santangelo said he would call 9-1-1 but do nothing on his own to save the child’s life. He also criticized Virginia hospitals for their policy of trying to save those lives.

“Gosnell is not alone. This investigation shows already those in the Bronx and in D.C., abortion workers talking about how they would commit infanticide and how this is either the tactic they would use, whether to expose the infant or put it in a jar of toxic solution so that it will stop breathing,” said Rose, who added that these first two videos are just the beginning of this series which she contends will repeatedly show abortion practitioners having detailed knowledge of exactly what they would do if a baby survives an abortion – a description that almost never follows the law.

The Gosnell trial was part of the motivation for this video series, but Rose said personal stories and cold statistics prove this situation plays out far more often than the pro-choice movement would have Americans believe.

“We’ve had our eye on the late-term abortion industry because of the stories that have emerged of victims that survived abortion attempts and then lived to tell about it or the stories of women who suffered or are even killed because of the abortion,” said Rose.

“Then we came across statistics like out of the U.K., where the study was done about one in 10 children in the late term survive their abortion attempt. This is because you’re inducing labor at this stage and the child, supposed to have been killed with forceps or poison, may come out alive,” she said.

While Rose would love to see proper enforcement of existing laws on late-term abortions in addition to new laws, she said real progress will come when abortion is no longer legal in America. She is also pushing hard against the conventional thought that having access to abortions empowers women.

“The abortion movement is built upon this false protection, supposedly, of women’s rights, but how does this support or empower women to have them involved in ghastly two to three-day procedures that literally rip their children from their wombs and endanger their physical and psychological health,” she said. “This is not good for women, just as this is clearly not good for our society because we’re killing our weakest children when they’re in their most vulnerable state.”

Rose said new videos could come in the next several days.

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/04/babies-drowned-alive-in-toxic-liquid/#SEdh3OOKL6V1zs7R.99

Any questions? It kind of makes me wonder what they do for recreation?

H/T to Pepp for the article.

Gosnell no anomaly, more late-term horrors

Undercover video exposes more late-term abortion horrors

By: John Hayward – Human Events
4/29/2013 09:23 AM

“Dr. Kermit Gosnell is not an aberration,” said Lila Rose, the president of Live Action, a group of pro-life undercover filmmakers. She was introducing a new undercover video that shows the horrors described in Gosnell’s trial “are business as usual for the abortion industry in America. Nationwide, it’s just another day at the office.”

While the two videos released thus far in Live Action’s new series “Inhuman: Undercover in America’s Late-Term Abortion Industry” don’t capture any of the sadistic B-movie horror theatrics that made Gosnell’s trial so stomach-churning, they do reveal a callous disregard for children “born alive” during late-term abortion procedures. This is precisely the situation that our abortion-radical president, Barack Obama, insisted should not be addressed through legislation to protect the life of the born-alive child when he was an Illinois state senator. Perhaps that’s why he didn’t have anything to say about the Gosnell trial – the biggest abortion story of the decade – when he became the first sitting President to address Planned Parenthood last week. (Full video and excerpts of Obama’s speech are available here.)

In the first “Inhuman” video, taken undercover at a clinic in the Bronx – where abortion is legal up to 24 weeks – an abortion clinic staffer makes it very clear that she knows she’s talking about the abortion of a fully -formed 6-month baby. Then she talks about drowning a born-alive infant in a jar of solution to make it stop “twitching.” She makes it clear the clinic won’t trouble its prospective customer with sonograms, or any discussion of the procedure’s target as a “child” or “baby.” And if the baby is born alive at home before the late-term abortion procedure can be completed, the staffer cheerfully advises the expectant mother to flush it down the toilet.

“I don’t know why you want to talk about all this,” the clinic staffer says. ”Just do it!”

Another staffer at the same clinic takes the possibility of an infant being born alive, and thus acquiring defensible human rights, much more seriously – but her description of the very fine line between an acceptable clinical “termination” within the mother’s body, and the killing of an infant born alive just a few inches outside the womb, highlights the inherently dehumanizing nature of late-term abortion. She’s very insistent upon use of the word “terminate” instead of “kill” to describe what happens to the target of a legal late-term abortion.

Read more at Human Events

“You’re done!”

———————————————

Part 2 –Then there is NARAL, Huffington Post reported:

NARAL President Ilyse Hogue:

“So let me be loud and clear: Kermit Gosnell is a dangerous predator. He wouldn’t exist, couldn’t exist, without the work of Rep. Duffy and his friends in the anti-choice movement. Opponents of women’s rights have hounded safe, legal health providers halfway out of business and blocked women’s access to the quality care they need.”

He wouldn’t exist if it were not for pro-life folks? Wow there is a stunner. What bullshit. The industry created Kermit Gosnell and those like him…I’m sure she forgot ….to do what they do and take advantage of every loophole or opportunity provided them, and create a few of their own.

Well, we now know exactly what type abortions and procedures he did. (for over 30 years) But of course what she overlooked is he was operating as a licensed doctor in a legal clinic as an abortion provider. Case closed. That he did things she didn’t know or approve of, well, that’s on her and her conscience for supporting the industry he was a part of. But it is the nature of their death business – or business of death.

The above suggests that the problems are wider than one clinic they seem quick to say the doctor was operating illegally. Isn’t it telling that the main reason they raided his place on running a prescription drug operation? NOT the abortions he was doing! As reports and witnesses state, they realized in one look they had a much bigger problem. Thank goodness for us he was running a painkiller racket too.

Hogue condemned Gosnell again on Friday. “The allegations against Gosnell are nothing short of horrific,” she said. “His actions were reprehensible and illegal. What he did in his clinic was reminiscent of the pre-Roe v. Wade days of back-alley abortion. He took advantage of lax state oversight and desperate women whose options were limited by the relentless efforts of anti-choice lawmakers in Pennsylvania.”

She must have missed the part where the reason inspections were terminated were not because of “anti-choice” lawmakers as she claims. It was because the inspection might reduce or cause problems for clinics thereby possibly restricting women from their ability to get an abortion. Inspections might infrinmge on someone’s right of aboriton. So inspections were lifted by “pro-choice” people for pro-choice reasons.

Whoa there Bessy, about the only thing logical here is that his actions were “horrific”.

“Reminiscent of back-alley abortions”? But he was there legally operating a clinic as a licensed Doctor. How reminiscent? Is that not the excuse we hear, legal safe and rare?(= utopia) Yet in his “established” legal practice he was doing this with immunity. And don’t pro-abortion folks say “keep it legal” and it will be safe? This was not safe legal or rare.

Now I know this may be hard for her to swallow the actual details of abortion, namely late-term, but their next assertion is that he is a one off. Well, the above piece describes various other clinics. It is idicative of how they treat the issue of Life and talk to prospects. That’s a nice window into the abortion world, which they told us if it is just legal and widely available it will be safe. Buzzer sound, Wrong!

How in the world can she gleefully try to blame the pro-life people for Gosnell, the way he treated patients, or the procedures that he was doing? Insanity is the only operative explanation. It is up to her and all her colleagues to answer the question — not her opponents — how many of these clinics… or houses of horrors are out there?

Make it a threefer
In front of a large national Planned Parenthood conference on Friday, as the first president to address the organization, he made it clear to the politically aligned crowd:

President Obama declared that “Planned Parenthood is not going anywhere” as the abortion giant continues to take hundreds of millions of our tax dollars.

Obama has been a strong supporter of the pro-choice group, and said that “no matter how fierce the opposition,” the past few years have shown that “Planned Parenthood is not going anywhere. It’s not going anywhere today. It’s not going anywhere tomorrow.

Read more at http://global.christianpost.com/news/obamas-blessing-of-planned-parenthood-outrageous-aclj-asserts-94931/#1OwQrhBFKueg6sVH.99

Well, neither are we “going anywhere” or away. For Obama to say that while the Gosnell trial is taking place — while he won’t mention it and yet goes to speak to PP — is the height of insensitivity, disrespect, and lacks the dignity of the office.

A President should stand for life and liberty, he obviously stands for death and the slavery of abortion.

[Again, H/T to Pepp article]