Hillary trails on campaign trail

This should make hillary spew her morning coffee. Oh, should but like Obama she’s too arrogant and in denial. Perhaps if her voters, the ones who don’t trust her either, wake up to say this is not what we were promised and what we signed on for?

Poll: Hillary Clinton in trouble in three key swing states

By Kelly Cohen – 7/22/15 | Washington Examiner

Hillary Clinton is trailing three leading Republican candidates in three key swing states.

In Colorado, Iowa and Virginia, the former secretary of state trails former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, Florida Sen. Marco Rubio and Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker in hypothetical general election matchups, according to new Quinnipiac University polls released Wednesday.

Against Bush, Clinton trails 36 percent to 41 percent in Colorado, 36 percent to 42 percent in Iowa and 39 percent to 42 percent in Virginia.

more Washington Examiner

Commentary from the gallery

What we need with Hillary is something like the misery index for the economy. My theory was the Dems didn’t care about the trust factor. They vote for them anyway, almost in spite of it — maybe because of it. So I don’t hold my breath for distrust to take her down, alone. Must be more.

The Dems must be made to feel as depressed and pathetic as they really are for the country to get anywhere. But it is quite hard to give people a conscience when they have none. If they can just see the pile of manure they put in the middle of the room, and take in the aroma, maybe just maybe we can get some reaction out of them.

This is sort of like chem trails on planes. You can make all kinds of explanations or theories about them but one cannot deny seeing them with their own eyes. Seeing Hillary flounder in the polls is obvious to us. Can Dems make a good enough explanation for the cause to shake their confidence? Trustability does come to bear, but there is much more with Hillary. She is as polarizing and disconnected from normal, working class people as possible. It’s obvious. But she tries to mock CEOS and all while she is virtually in bed with them.

Will Soros pull the plug on Heiress Hillary at some point? Will he leave her to whither in the vine? Will the very support she is tied to finally say Basta Hillary, enough?

A case against her run.

Another question on Hillary remains. Why would she really want to run anyway? I’m being serious. She and Bubba — the Tookie of the charity world — have a pretty good racket er operation. Why does she really need to run? The answer of course is, you know, power and influence. The influence racket requires the power center to really have massive affect.

It worked great when she was Sec of State. If not for running for president, and her aspirations for the White House, they could be very comfortable. No hassles, raking in their piles of doe from all their connections. It is the influential political connection they need. But they still have that, Bubba has proved hugely popular, so is Hill for that matter. They could do well outside, like most institutionally connected liberals. And they would/do make it a family business. It crosses political lines. So why not just be happy in that high life they’ve extorted and built on the backs of America and its politics? (or the little people)

It’s a very lucrative racket for the grifters.

They also have their media connections and influence. What is lacking? Not much. No, the only possible reason — take altruism out — is that she wants access to the reins of power to get the greatest possible bang for the bucks. She really doesn’t care about people or anyone else. She thinks as long as she (or they) are at the center, then everyone else will be happy. Or as long as she is eating on the right side of the mushroom — like Alice in Wonderland — everything else automatically falls in place. Life will be good, people happy, the world comfortable in its chaotic bliss. Long as they benefit personally, what’s not to like?

Obama Rallies Abortion Vote

Obama has courted demographic group after special interest group. Now, sensing his vulnerability, he is turning on the juice toward one of his favorite blocs, the abortion vote.  So they are running attack ads against Romney in swing states. That’s right, make sure no one disturbs their so-called “right” to kill babies. Imagine what nasty person might want to do that?

So if there wasn’t enough white guilt left in the bank to help Obama, they will just have to double up on enthusiasm from elsewhere, such as the culture of death, abortion crowd. Now that is an issue they can really rally the base over. It’s an easy no-brainer for liberal Dems.

On the right, we get lectured by the left that the election should be about jobs and the economy… yada yada. Not those controversial personal issues. They claim the cultural/social issues are the last resort for the Right. (I was even told that days ago here) Well, we don’t have to bring it up, the left does. The Right gets criticized for even talking about abortion. Yea right, “shhhh, let the dead dogs lie.”

But the abortion lobby is one of Obama’s most loyal allies.  In a way, I guess he is depending on dead babies to pull him across the finish line. This is the left’s way of energizing and rallying women to his side in key states. They need baby killers onboard — or ‘all in’ as team O says.

So here come the threats from the so-called “choice” crowd that fundamental “rights” are at risk. However, not threats like ‘someone is going to kill babies or seek an agenda to kill babies’, but that someone might “oppose” it or, gasp, do anything at all to slow or stop it. Can’t let anyone do anything to prevent the free killing of babies. They must “protect” that at all cost. I hope you get my satire.(and sarcasm) Sometimes you have to wonder how upside down it all is?

It’s a shame dead babies can’t vote, though dead adults do regularly in many places. Let no one disenfranchise dead adults. (but that’s another issue)

Last month, Planned Parenthood launched a 1.4 million dollar ad campaign of its own against Mitt Romney in June, targeting Florida, Virginia, Washington, DC and Iowa.

One ref: http://www.bpnews.net/BPnews.asp?ID=38230

WASHINGTON (BP) — The economy has been the centerpiece of the 2012 presidential campaign, but President Obama’s re-election team apparently wants to make it also about abortion and has launched a 30-second TV ad drawing a distinction between Obama’s pro-choice position and Mitt Romney’s pro-life view.
The Post reported the ad will air in eight swing states: Virginia, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Florida, Ohio, Iowa, Colorado and Nevada.

“Troubled”?