Good vs. Evil

In 2020, the age-old debate over good versus evil still rages on. Or should that be battle? But is there any way to score the current landscape?

To judge the levels of which is winning or losing, I have a simple test.

What is the amount or saturation level of evil in society? Start by asking a question: what is the cost of doing the right thing? The answer is a good indication of the level of evil.

Ideally it used to be doing the right thing because it was the right thing to do, was just the rule. It was appreciated or even praised. And that was it. But that has changed.

It can be more complex these days.

Now doing the right thing can have consequences. There can be penalties. Sometimes one pays a stiff price for doing the right thing. Not always. Well, it could even be a heavy price at times. If you think about it realistically, you can see those areas.

So I think that cost is directly relative to the amount of evil there is. Not to oversimplify it; I’m not saying that is a hard rule in all situations but in general.

You could take that to another level with the amount of good or evil in the public sector. Consider what Trump tried to do. Consider the amount of resistance, by Resisters, to give you an idea what I mean. There is certainly a lot of resistance..

Then look at the resistance or cost inflicted by Antifa or BLM protestors in riots or looting. It drives the cost of doing the right thing higher. Look at the ability of cops to prevent it.

Look at how many cops were murdered for just doing their job. So I think all that, and the tally of the cost, is a reasonable indicator to the saturation level of evil there.

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2020

What Do You Think?

There is a quote I recall frequently. I’m not much of a quote person but this one stuck with me for decades now. Some quotes are rich.

“Just when you figure out how the game is played, they change all the rules.”

There may be a few sources for that in various forms, But my source is from a man in a testimony to congress over 25 years ago. That person was Donald J Trump. It seemed to apply then and it applies now.

Another favorite quote that held up was from Ronald Reagan:

“It isn’t so much that liberals are ignorant. It’s just that they know so many things that aren’t so.”

Faulty DNA

Some people may be surprised to know I am a highly-accredited academic. For instance, I believe I found the exact DNA string that leads to the destruction of the country.

So preemptively interrupting or blocking that sequence would prevent our disintegration before it’s too late. Isn’t science wonderful? If only we listened to it… ie. political science.

This discovery took over 30 years of experimentation, yet it’s not too late to save America.

I will use elections as an example for the sake of illustration. Applied science, you know. The premise of the problem is: the loser gets to define the agenda and results of the election. I’ll call this ‘loser rules’ principle. It only happens on one side of the DNA pool.

You may laugh but this has become a growing perception for some time now. I’ve been studying it. It’s widely accepted too. And that is the problem. The more this malicious code grows, the faster the disintegration process happens.

Allow me to map this out. Don’t worry if you did not understand it at first. It took me a while to track this mutation down.

So just say the radical left loses an election. Those who lose get to determine the agenda, or sizable chunk of it, no matter who won. Thereby corrupting other DNA in the sequence.

That process, over time, leads to disintegration and eventual destruction.

And this malicious sequence is being applied right before our eyes and yet we do not or cannot seem to stop it in its tracks. The worst part of it is the very people(members) in that DNA pool continue to mislabel this as a great democratic process, and the product of it as a solution to our problems. Still don’t quite see it yet?

Say loser X has all these radical plans and ideas from who knows where, whatever source. Though it did lose. At the end of the election, Loser X says its ideas were so popular among members that those ideas must be incorporated into the mainstream.

If winner refuses, Loser X will unleash its radical dogs in the base to attack. So the winner is compelled to oblige X. Winner W has no choice except appease Loser X by incorporating the ideas and radicals to implement them into the mix. Let’s call that mixture “S”.

Mixture S now thinks that process is just the cost of doing any business or pushing a major agenda forward. So radical ideas and people are employed that contaminate the agenda – and whatever influence mixture S has on the public at large.

This assures the most radical ideas always come to the surface to be incorporated.

Now if this is repeated over and over, it leads to getting the worst and most radical ideas into the mainstream and into the public. In repetition, the result is a disintegrating effect on the whole. Well, it could hardly be a good outcome.

So the host becomes more contaminated over time. Speed is the only variable.

Oh so you need some examples? No matter who wins, the loser claims the right to determine actions in the wider agenda. See, the Democrats lose in congress, they assert the right to determine what the body will do. Radicals are highly effective at influencing it.

Say Hillary Clinton loses. They claim she really didn’t and that they are now free to delegitimize the entire process, hence corrupting it. No matter what winner Trump does forward, they contaminate the entire process however they can. Thus affecting the outcome, or perceived outcome, of everything.

Another example is the minority rules principle. Wait for a national emergency then demand the body agenda implement the radical minority’s plans. So Rad-Loser offers winner no other choice or option. Incorporate radical plans or else.

The loser always determines the agenda, or in effect the minority determines the agenda.

The result of this process playing out, over and over, creates a scenario. This maliciously corrupt law or code demands the worst ideas be implemented at the sacrifice or exemption of good ones, So the end pool is corrupted downward. It is a beautifully destructive force.

The entire DNA pool has become so corrupted that many of its fervent members now see this process as ‘normal’ and the resulting disintegration as ‘progress.’

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2020

Biden Transition Needs Access?

I have a semi-serious question. Does anyone think Biden and his team of intellectual thugs are sitting in a room just fretting over when and whether they can get access for their transition team to work with the White House? And how fast?

Or are they more aptly conniving and honing their strategy to keep us from knowing what they will do, and what it will do to the country? And keeping it all from the country?

I bet on the later. But that answers the first part. They aren’t so concerned about the transition as much as they are in fooling people about everything they will do. (dependent on media to keep us ignorant.) Democrats don’t have whistleblowers; no one talks.

So this would mean their complaints are a pure ruse that Biden is concerned about the transition, and how any delays may cost time and lives. They don’t actually care about that. They would only use the dead for political fodder anyway. That is not hyperbole.

This mad rush to get Biden in the loop is so preposterous. The guy who was co-pilot in the last administration. If he doesn’t know the job or his way around the place now, then he should never have run for the job. The people around him are career insiders. They just had a four-year break. So they are only returning. Need to get up to speed? Please.

Need to get briefed on all the vaccine distribution plans? Give it a rest. Biden ran on Covid and had all those elaborate plans to fix everything, didn’t he? He’s the mad scientist of pandemics. He’s the guy with all the plans, which is why gullible people voted for him.

He was a useless sidekick for Obama before but now he is Einstein. The White House is his lightning bolt and the world is his grounding rod. Who needs any access with that?

He’s supposed to have all the answers. He had the answer for Flynn, using the Logan Act. Now his team needs information? Ironic, the co-captain of the coup needs information.

National security? Well, that never bothered him or Obama before — not for a second.

So….number 2 of the coup is looking out for you?

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2020

Politics Of A Pandemic

Everyone now knows how bad an epidemic is. As if we needed a lesson on that. Indeed, it is a powerful thing. But how powerful?

Yes, a pandemic is powerful, not only how it can kill people.

But we have learned that a pandemic was powerful enough to determine who should be President of the United States and our way of life. Who knew a pandemic could do that?

Well, it even determined how we would run elections. It determined who were the winners and losers in the economy. It determined how we should educate our kids or work.

It is a very omnipresent thing, this Chinese virus from hell.

Why stop there? It should also determine world economic affairs. It should determine our global warming agenda. It can create a Great Reset. It can determine our economic system, our energy source. It should also determine what governments can do to citizens under the guise of an emergency.

“There is an urgent need for global stakeholders to cooperate in simultaneously managing the direct consequences of the COVID-19 crisis. To improve the state of the world, the World Economic Forum is starting The Great Reset initiative.” — [from Great Reset forum site]

It is no joke. They can do all this, or anything they want, under the auspices of a “pandemic.” That means they have found a way to politicize even a pandemic. And then they easily find ways to weaponize it against every faucet of our society.

Now no one likes a pandemic. No one hopes for one. But few could have expected the ways in which it could be used against the people as a weapon. If you had serious issues about the expanse of government power before, then this tool put your fears on another level.

For instance, we also learned this pandemic could determine rules and authorize freedoms of speech, religion or assembly. And it could be weaponized to limit those rights, too.

So if you did not see a pandemic as a national security issue as well, you were in for a surprise. It was not a matter of determining rights or banning them, it was essentially a manner of control.

This China virus gave ruling elites carte blanche to do what they will to people. Connect it to global economic policies and you have a cocktail from hell.

A forum in June with world leaders inspired them all to use the pandemic to push as much globalism, climate change policy as they could. Think of the pandemic as an opportunity to install their agenda. You might call it the new green deal-maker.

“Every country, from the United States to China, must participate, and every industry, from oil and gas to tech, must be transformed,” wrote Klaus Schwab, the founder and executive chairman of the World Economic Forum, in an article published on WEF’s website. “In short, we need a ‘Great Reset’ of capitalism.” – The Hill

If that were not bad enough, then any cure or vaccine easily presents another good opportunity to control people. Or, as Zeke Emanuel sees it, we need to determine who does or doesn’t get the vaccine. Of course age limits need to determine that. And a magical 75-year life span would be a good cutoff for the use of valuable resources like medicine.

Everyone see where all this is going? Turns out a pandemic can be a very useful thing, even a tool. The virus as a huge political opportunity Leftist who politicized and weaponized the entire apparatus extort it so easily that I bet many kids will not realize the way in which the pandemic was used like a tool to control or influence their lives.

But now the Left has done something even more amazing than grant all this authority to it, it has personified a pandemic into a rogue dictator that gets to control your life. It is no longer a thing. The Democrats, however, can hide their deeds behind it which keeps them unaccountable for the actions. Who knew a pandemic was that powerful?

Think about that Great Reset button next time Democrats say they are following science.

 

Exhibit B: Justin Trueau at UN conference September 29, 2020

“This pandemic has provided an opportunity for a Reset. This is our chance to accelerate our pre-pandemic efforts to re-imagine economic systems that actually address global challenges like extreme poverty, inequality, and climate change.” — J. Trudeau, reported by Climate Depot

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2020

The Obama Onion

So Obama is not done agitating and torturing America. He trots out yet another memoir, couched as a bio, to attack all his political enemies. Nice work if you can get it.

No, it doesn’t have to be true. He can just project all his demented thoughts and motives into other people, like any fiction writer would do. Make them into whatever he wants.

Paint them all as sinister characters in his rise to “the Promised Land” – which he doesn’t seem to have found yet. Nor could he because his distaste for America is something he will never swallow. Why let all that animosity go when it got him this far, and he’s still making money off of it?

He should have called the first of a 2 volume set “The Obama Onion” — raw onion.

Obama says in a new memoir: [excerts in The Atlantic]

‘My very presence in the White House triggered a deep-seated panic’

“Through Palin,” Obama writes, “it seemed as if the dark spirits that had long been lurking on the edges of the modern Republican party – xenophobia, anti intellectualism, paranoid conspiracy theories, an antipathy toward black and brown folks – were finding their way to centre stage.”

Instead of a book about his own experience, clearly his main objective is to define and attack his opponents, smearing those he felt like taking aim at. But trying to do that in a way cunning enough that his words add legitimacy to it, since he gets to define them.

Remember it was actually the entrance of Sarah Palin in 08 that caused panic through Obama’s campaign.  (or his résumé as I call it) And it was not darkness, antipathy or xenophobia that did that. He uses his bio to slime and define his enemies?

What hemorrhages out of his statements is not OURS but Obama’s own bitter resentment toward people, particularly those who don’t accept his brand of radical and racial politics.

But what exactly did all these people do to Barack Obama? Where did they stop or prevent him from anything in his life? He sure needs a crutch and a grudge.

Promised land? Later he explained his choice for that title saying “I’m not yet ready to abandon the possibility of America.” Generous. And the timing of it and the ‘book tour?’

Right Ring | Bullright

Peaceful Transfer Of Power

Have any more deceitful and radicalized words ever been used toward an election, or its outcome, than peaceful transfer of power? The acronym PTP works for me.

So the people who authored the most contentious, unpeaceful, undemocratic and protested transition in American history now lecture us about a peaceful transition of power.

First of all, can anyone tell me anything Democrats do peacefully? What have they done? Violence and threats are usually the appetizer or chaser for whatever plans they have up their sleeve. But now they are in flower-child mode. Climb aboard the peace train.

Interesting too that they haven’t complained about the anti-peace rallies all summer. They only got concerned when they thought riots and violence could hurt them in the election.

Did you hear them complaining about Portland or Seattle and those, achem, peaceful transitions of power? Did they caution Antifa or BLM about peaceful transfers of goods when they looted and burned neighborhoods? Not much of a peace movement there.

But I don’t think a coup qualifies as a peaceful transition of power either.

One would almost think what Democrats really desire is a non-peaceful transfer of power, to coincide with their corrupted democracy. That does seem to excite them.

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2020

Preserving Our Democracy

Where were all these preservationists of democracy four years ago? If anyone here is defining democracy downward, it is Democrats.

We had four years of war against our democracy. Now they believe in democracy?

If they really cared about it, they would care about all the rule changes and undemocratic means they went to in subverting democracy, to reimagine our election system.

Actually, good oversight and checks would only support and defend democracy. But they are against all that. No questions asked.

They told us it was the smoothest election ever. (that ought to scare you) It worked like a charm. After years of telling us elections were at risk and in jeopardy. How dare we disagree about election interference and manipulation everywhere? Then suddenly elections are smooth as silk in the biggest election reconstruction effort ever.

Joe Biden kept saying “voting is happening now” but he couldn’t state his positions.

Dems had just spent four years telling us democracy was breached, broken, and on life support. They even used it as a basis in their sham impeachment trial in January. And they stuck that trial up against the State of the Union Speech to undermine that.

We know they don’t care about hypocrisy. It only bothers the people though, not democrats. They will reverse their stand as soon as it is necessary, and as fast.

Protecting the integrity of elections and voting matters not to the Democrats either. Democracy is supposedly whatever they want to do.

So why do Dems make such a big deal about democracy anyway? Because we care, they know it is important to us. It is our means to send the elected ruling class a message.

They proved how much they cared about that sacred democracy over the last five years. They did not care about protecting it, in process, before 2016 or for four years after.

In fact, it did not matter that they were undermining democracy the entire time. They deligitimized a duly elected president. They fought to disenfranchise everyone who voted for and supported him. Actually, they denied democracy any part in the whole process.

A coup is not democracy. And let’s not forget those cauldrons of democracy that sprang up in riots, looting, and burning down stores. They called them mostly peaceful protests – a ptotected right. “You can’t blame them, it is about democracy.”

Now they concoct an election nightmare with rules bypassing legislatures and enacted by rogue officials and judges. Then it becomes pristine democracy. Who should question the results of such an election? Just like that, four years of questioning those results of the last election was tossed like a Trump ballot.

When you start asking questions about the process now, you are defying sacred grounds. Suddenly we don’t question election processes. That’s off limits.

Excuse me for being sickened by this one-way democracy sham. Cry me a river when they don’t get their way. Then it is time to riot, burn and loot.

Store owners were prepared for predictable violence if Dems did not get their way. Businesses boarded up in advance of the election, knowing full well what to expect.

This one time they were safe because Democrats appeared to get their way by using all their tactics. Had it gone the other way, well, it would still be burning. How many would have been killed or injured? How many stores would have been cleaned out, again?

Afterward, they would blame Trump for all of it it, for winning the election. It would have been called an “attack on democracy.” Not what they did but what Trump did by winning.

Spare me all the lectures from Biden, Obama and media about “preserving our sacred democracy.” The democracy means nothing to them, as meaningless as the Constitution.

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2020

Voting For Dummies

I have not gotten over my poll anxieties yet. Not that I was ever fond of them before.

But now another poll, this one from Rasmussen, just grabbed my attention. You can take it with a grain of salt. I’ll just give it a speck of thought that there may be something to it.

So a new Rasmussen poll, post-election, finds that only 56% of the Biden voters actually voted FOR Biden. My first thought was who were all those others voting for?

Turns out not really for Biden. Well, 29% of those Biden voters say they were voting against Trump. (about 30% which is phenomenal) But then, astonishingly, 15% or the remainder were not sure. Get that? At least he had over 50% really for him.

I’m not sure which one is worse, those that were voting against Trump or those who weren’t sure who they were voting for, or why?

(just keep that one under your MAGA hat for safe keeping)

Or as Ted Poe always says: “And that’s just the way it is!”.
Like former Democrat congressman, James Traficant, used to say: “Beam me up, Scotty!”

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2020

Wonders Of A Coup Never Cease

Wonders never cease. Four years later, the professional liars continue their charade.

Lindsey Graham held hearings with Comey and now the infamous McCabe testifies.

McCabe announced he was the target of a wrongful biased investigation, which resulted in his termination. He said he is seeking recourse through the courts.

I’ll be danged. McCabe a victim of bias? Wow. And what recourse do his victims or Donald Trump have for what was done? What court does Trump go to for remedy of treatment?

So this is what a career professional, lying snake looks and acts like.

McCabe was “wrongfully fired and did nothing wrong,” he told Sen. Blackburn. A “deeply unfair and flawed investigation,” he called it.

He also admitted that it was an investigation on the Trump campaign.

Dianne Feinstein said “it’s time to turn the page on Crossfire Hurricane”…i.e from the whole 2016 election cabal. Well, I’ll be danged, again.

She means from that page they turned into a coup, a special counsel jihad and smears against a sitting president. The page that undermined a president and targeted candidate Trump. That tome…. radical Democrats conspired and eagerly wrote with Deep State?

That tome also later parlayed with an impeachment hoax show trial.

But at the bottom of all this cabal was also the treatment of Gen. Flynn. McCabe admitted pursuing a counterintelligence investigation – based on whatever lies and false premises they deemed fit – and then denied the Logan Act was any factor in it.

However, that is exactly what was driving the entire agenda, for what they claim was appropriate treatment. It was a stealth Logan Act case they were pursuing against Flynn.

McCabe requires the willing suspension of disbelief. (words Hillary was fond of)
To quote Bill Clinton, “this whole thing is the biggest fairy tale I’ve ever seen!”

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2020

Results Matter

I’m not much for polls these days, but one decent poll before election said that 56% of people said they were better off now than they were 4 years ago.

I happen to think even that one was understated.

So in our infinite wisdom then, what America is going to do is turn the clock back four years. Tell me that is what Americans wants to do. Does that make any sense?

No, I don’t think it does to people either and I don’t think it is what they wanted.

Nevertheless, that won’t stop Democrats from declaring a mandate to change the American economy, and roll back the clock and economy 4 years.

Do people want massive tax hikes, too?

I don’t have a problem with the results of things – whether I like then or not – and I can deal with them rationally. But I do have huge problems with Democrats’ interpretations of the results. Those radical interpretations are what people are being forced to accept.

When did we just start ignoring reality and the voice of the people?

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2020

VDH Election Explained

 
Cedits:

“Author, historian and political commentator Victor Davis Hanson analyses events in the United States as the election drama continues to unfold. Biden looks likely to gain the Presidency, but the ultimate winners and losers of this election are still being decided.

If you value this discussion and want to see more like it, make sure you subscribe to the channel here:” https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCtnY… And stay right up to date with all the conversations by subscribing to the newsletter here: https://johnanderson.net.au/contact/

Follow John on Twitter: https://twitter.com/JohnAndersonAO Follow John on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/johnandersonao/ Website: https://johnanderson.net.au/

Away They Go

And away we go on that beautiful balloon, like the old song lyrics “up up and away, my beautiful balloon”. Such is the spirit for Joe Biden and his sidekick, Kamala Harris.

So they were off Saturday night, or so it seemed, on their beautiful ride across the fluffy clouds. Floating on a sea of unity beneath them to carry them through. Isn’t that the storybook way it always works for Democrats? Nothing can stop them; they are on their arrogant way. And that fits all narratives and images media floods us with.

Except nothing could be further from the truth. Just as long as people think everything is all pomp and circumstance with sunshine, lollipops and rainbows, to mix other lyrics with the mood. Everything is functioning right on schedule.

This case is unique though. There are contrasting contradictions everywhere. The opening scene is Biden’s victory speech upon their ‘election’. Media ordained Biden the victor.

A crowd of people and vehicles surrounds the stage at a drive-in lot in Wilmington, Delaware. People are waiting sandwiched between tightly parked vehicles. But for once there is not a bonfire in the foreground or protest signs everywhere. Instead of chants of no justice no peace, there are peace signs flashing and smiles.

American flags are waved rather than burned on the ground.

Dance music replaces angry screams from a megaphone. The crowd cheers instead of issuing violent threats. As if it were the first time people heard cheers in this country.

Biden speaks lofty tones of platitudes instead of angry catch phrases. He suggests doing good things. He now talks about unity instead of people with “veins popping out” carrying tiki torches. He lectures us all to stop treating opponents as enemies, rather than branding his own opponents as racists.

Then in the finale afterward, there are fireworks lighting the sky instead of shooting fireworks at cops like weapons. Party mood instead of the usual riots.

So the irony is rich with hypocrisy everywhere. The media calls it a grand moment instead of smearing it as racist rhetoric. Reporters say it touches all the notes perfectly. Media calls it a beautiful thing to see the family, instead of mocking them. What excitement, and a “historic” moment. What a great country this is, they say, rather than condemning it.

Flashback to the way it happened when Trump won. Well, a completely opposite story. Promises of resistance and illegitimacy floated through the air thick with hatred.

Media boasts and gloats. But who knew that a Biden election was a cure for PTSD? That conclusion based on Don Lemon’s dramatic vision of a Biden-Harris victory granted by media. He declared he and his leftist brethren were stricken with PTSD by Trump.

Yet Democrats’ celebration goes on despite the highly unusual, controversial, speculative outcome in the contested election. But narratives and images are progressives’ specialty. Truth and reality have no bearing on election perception. Media, you wrote the script.

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2020

Empty Suit Wins Presidency?

So let me state the Democrats’ best defense of Joe Biden, in the event he won the election. This will be long and hard to grasp. It requires deep intellectual acuity.

Here it is: “Joe Biden is a good man.” That’s it. That stimulates every neuron in the brain.

Combine that with the way he ran a campaign from his basement that raised record-breaking amounts of money. However, he has stayed in a Holiday Inn a few times.

I have been listening to Biden supporters across the spectrum, from identity to identity, and that is their explanation for why they support Joe Biden. It’s the good man excuse.

That alone will guarantee him to be an excellent president. “He has the right character for the job.” Thus he will be a good president. That’s it. (debate is over)

It is now the consensus of the national press — as if any other possibility ever existed.

At the time I finished writing, the media has declared Biden the winner. They skipped right past declaring states. Biden IS the winner! Still counting but skip to the chase.

And right on cue, as if planned, crowds formed in the streets dancing and celebrating. Now they are waving American Flags instead of burning them. But more on that later.

Do you get the irony of media taking a stand to declare Biden the winner?
“Live, from his basement in Delaware… it’s not Saturday Night Live, but Biden Live.

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2020

Fox’s Arizona Call

The call on election night to give Arizona to Biden was from Fox. It was a hasty call that didn’t make sense. But then it reminded me of something I saw a week ago. The article meant one thing then but possibly even more now.

A top exec at Fox News used to work with Biden and other Dems. He could be responsible for some change of attitudes at Fox. But then along came election night and suddenly, preemptively it seemed, Fox called Arizona for Biden when hundreds of thousands of votes were left to count. No real explanation was given. All MSM went right along with the play.

A move which, as time went by, no one seemed to understand. Take a look at this article from National File. June 29, 2020 (excerpt)

“Danny O’Brien, the executive vice president and head of government relations at Fox News’ parent company, is a former Joe Biden chief of staff who is reportedly actively helping the Biden campaign connect to Washington lobbyists.

Danny O’Brien started out with gigs at the Democratic National Committee, director of ethnic outreach for the Clinton White House, and on the Al Gore campaign. He served as Joe Biden’s chief of staff in the Senate from 2003 to 2006, then worked as political director for Biden’s 2008 presidential campaign.

After working for Democrat Sen. Bob Menendez and General Electric, he inexplicably became the executive vice president and head of government relations at Fox Corp in 2018. Fox Corp is the Murdoch entity that currently owns Fox News. Thus, the effective chief lobbyist for Fox News is a hardcore Biden guy. And he’s also not-so-discreetly helping the Biden campaign this election cycle.” (See more)

For more information, check this related article on Canada Free Press.

It’s Howdy Doody time!!

What time does the civil war start? Asking for a friend.

Let’s make sure we count the military votes, while ripping the guts out of the country.

In that spirit…. a little look back.

“You’ve got to do more than just simply talk about it.”

This message has been brought to you by the Rip Van Winkle Enterprise.