Coup In Process

Attention:

We temporarily interrupt your regular anti-Trump
programming to bring you this coup in process.

We cannot tell you, the objective target, when that
regular programming will be returning at this time.

Thank you for your patience.
Management

[end of PSA message]

Right Ring | Bullright

Impeachment Plan In The Works

So the nutso Left has a brilliant plan? Not exactly, this comes from the RINO, Never Trump nuts. But what’s the real difference, anyway?

Mission: Remove Trump from office
Plan: Force a secret vote in the Senate impeachment trial

Yeah, that ought to work! 😂

Never Trump strategist outlines plan to remove Trump by secret vote

by Tim Pearce | November 12, 2019 | Washington Examiner

A former adviser to President George W. Bush has proposed a way for Senate Republicans to remove President Trump from office while avoiding accountability from angry Republican voters.

Juleanna Glover is a veteran Washington hostess, lobbyist, and strategist who has worked on the staffs of Bush, former Vice President Dick Cheney, and former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani. Glover also advised Republican Arizona Sen. John McCain during his 2008 presidential run.

Glover, 50, a longtime Trump critic who supported independent candidate Evan McMullin in 2016, proposed a strategy for Senate Republicans to oust Trump should the House follow through with impeaching the president. In an article for Politico, Glover wrote that a handful of outgoing Republicans could take all the political heat and force the Senate to adopt a secret vote on the articles of impeachment passed in the House.

“Some might say transparency in congressional deliberations and votes is inviolable, and it’s true that none of the previous Senate impeachments have been conducted via secret ballot,” she said.

“But the Senate’s role in an impeachment is analogous to a U.S. jury, where secret ballots are often used,” Glover continued. “When Electoral College gridlock has resulted in the House picking the president — the House elected Thomas Jefferson in 1800 and John Quincy Adams in 1824 — that vote has been secret. And, of course, when citizens vote for president, they do so in private.”

More: https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/never-trump-strategist-outlines-plan-to-remove-trump-by-secret-vote

Right, so how many millions of Americans are you trying to piss off? Or only the ones who voted for Trump? Your plan is brilliant if you want a successful coup against the POTUS. This from a former Busher. So undermine the presidency for all future.

Sounds like a plan. But then why even bother having a trial at all? Why not just throw him out of office without one? Since there never is any accountability — for years at least — of Senators and Congress, let’s just keep that shutout going.

Shout Out to Kaepernick on Veterans Day

Just in time to warm the cockles of the radical Left on Veteran’s Day

Newspaper gives a shout out on Veteran’s day…..to Colin Kaepernick.

Mike Rowe on Veterans Day

Mike Rowe’s Fantastic Veterans Day Tribute: No ‘Trigger Words’ or ‘Safe Space’ in the Military

By Joe Saunders
Published November 11, 2019 —  The Western Journal

Few salutes are as heartfelt as this.

On a day to celebrate American veterans, when the country offers its gratitude to the men and women who’ve worn the uniform of military service, author and former television host Mike Rowe took to Fox News on Monday to offer his own praises.

“Is there a greater meritocracy in the world? Is there a better example of true diversity?” he asked on “Fox & Friends,” before a special Veterans Day audience garbed in military uniforms.

“My friends in the military, the thing I’m most proud about, when I go to bases, when I visit with people, they are utterly color-blind. There’s no conversation about, you know, trigger words. There’s no safe space. The military is not a safe space!”

But that doesn’t mean it doesn’t bring out the best, he said…/

MORE: https://www.westernjournal.com/mike-rowes-fantastic-veterans-day-tribute-no-trigger-words-safe-space-military/

Impeachment Irony

I’m sorry, Democrats, but you want to impeach President Trump over Ukraine. You could hardly ask for more foreign interference in elections and the politicization of government or foreign policy than that.

Yeah, that looks like Ukraine is the most important thing to voters and a reason to try to overturn an election. What they are really trying to impeach is the will of the people.

Then Democrats can’t even conduct their DNC impeachment on any honored process established over decades. Who needs to follow established procedures?

Sure, the Constitution says it right there: The president can be removed “on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors [*or foreign communication Congress finds objectionable].” — there revision complete.

Right Ring | Bullright

Explanation of Electoral college

Gds44's Blog

Only 319 Square Miles
The founders of this country were much smarter than and more responsible than our current Congressional representatives.

Fantastic Explanation of the Electoral College

Last week the Democratic-controlled House of Representatives introduced a bill to eliminate the electoral college. It seems that, since they couldn’t win the last presidential election under the rules that have existed for almost 250 years, they want to change the rules. Below is an excellent explanation of why this is a very bad idea.

In their infinite wisdom, the United States ‘ Founders created the Electoral College to ensure the STATES were fairly represented. Why should one or two densely populated areas speak for the whole of the nation?

The following list of statistics has been making the rounds on the Internet. It should finally put an end to the argument as to why the Electoral College makes sense.

Do share this…

View original post 209 more words

Favorite Un-American Pastime

The never a good word CNN asked a Democrat congressman about Trump getting booed at the World Series game. Seems they are now outraged by what they do themselves.

He said: “Unfortunately, the president is contributing to the very rhetoric that is being used against him.”

Nice try to blame Trump for what Dems say. So blame Trump for their own behavior. Now they sit in a stadium they paid hundreds of dollars for and attack the president.

Anytime anyone mentions anything about a Democrat like “lock her up,” they claim it is disgusting. “They should be condemned” and stopped. “There’s no place for that rhetoric.”

Dems’ favorite pastime is attacking Trump, whenever possible. It’s their entertainment.

I would ike to officially make the word a noun, they are the un-Americans.

Sign of the times… now bad is it?
Ssomeone like Nate Silver gets slammed and hate trends on Twitter for saying

“It really [is] amazing how many Libs can’t even permit Trump to have *one good day* (nobody will remember this stuff by Tuesday) after US forces kill perhaps the world’s most wanted terrorist.” – Twitter

How dare he say that! That’s pretty much the end of Nate and his loyal fans.

Right Ring | Bullright

How many ways can Democrats be offended?

The Democrats reveal their true nature every time they complain about something. It doesn’t matter what it is because everything offends them, in some way.

Trump makes a statement or a tweet and whaaaaah! It’s like a million babies crying all at once. Trump uses the word lynching and whoa, it is national headlines. “How dare he! He should never ever have used that word… THAT WORD!!”

Trump makes a phone call to Ukraine, all the sirens go off and the whistle blowers come out in force. He said what? Sure, it’s impeachable because Trump said it. In fact, just admit it that anything Trump says is impeachable.

He calls for withdrawing troops from Syria and even former Governor Kasich runs out on CNN calling on congress to investigate and get to the bottom of it. Everything is worthy of an investigation too. No, we aren’t in ridiculous season. We are way past that season.

We are now in the season of insanity.

When Trump first came in, Al Green went to the floor and demanded the House start impeachment proceedings. So he called for a vote but he didn’t get their approval vote.

Not to worry, now they just start impeachment inquiry without a vote. Who needs it? We tell Pelosi to call for a vote and she says “we don’t need a vote” for that. We can start an impeachment whenever we like.

Of course that means in any future administration, a congressperson or committee can just start an impeachment and we are on the way. Due process is now no process. Too bad Al Green didn’t know that. What’s to vote on, just do impeachment?

Meanwhile, Democrats continue to be outraged and offended by everything the president does or says. He is in office which is the real offense. And every day he is in that office they grow more offended. If the objective is to drive the Left crazy, we finally succeeded. There is no road back from that. Actually, there is no up or down and no right or wrong anymore. There is only one state, to be perpetually offended by everything.

Addendum: I should have included that early on when Trump said his campaign was under surveillance, the Deep State-defending Dems squealed like pigs. How dare he claim in any way that Obama’s administration conducted surveillance on Trump.

Comey lied telling Trump he was not under surveillance. It then went into Deep State denial and claimed if any surveillance took place, it must have been warranted, legal and necessary. But it was not directed at Trump, and certainly was not political.

Well… that very Deep State of very offended denial.

Right Ring | Bullright

Biden The Official Scapegoat

So it is all starting to look like a plan, like everything else the dirty Dems do. Try to run Joe Biden for a diversion. But there is a lot of people supporting him.

Killing Biden — to salvage Obama

By Charles Hurt – The Washington Times – Tuesday, October 15, 2019

ANALYSIS/OPINION:

The biggest cover-ups are usually the ones right in front of us — as they say, “hiding in plain sight.”

This whole impeachment-in-search-of-a-high-crime charade going on in the House of Representatives today has nothing to do with actually removing President Trump from office.

If that is all Democrats wanted to do, then they would just field a candidate against him whom voters find slightly less detestable than they found Hillary Clinton. That way, when they boot President Trump from office, they will have voters on their side. And Vice President Mike Pence won’t be left sitting in the Oval Office.

Anyway, they are presently running a hotly partisan and absurdly secret witch hunt that will only pants themselves in the U.S. Senate. (Spoiler Alert: Republicans control the U.S. Senate, where the Democrats’ hotly partisan and absurdly secret witch hunt will be dead on arrival.)

So, what is this all about? It is a cover-up, plain and simple.

Whom, you ask, are they trying to cover for? Their next political savior who can take down Mr. Trump?

Certainly not former Vice President Joseph R. Biden. If anything, Mr. Biden has been set ablaze atop the altar as a sacrifice in this massive international cover-up by Democrats.

The sleaze and dishonesty and self-dealing that oozes from the Biden name these days will leave a permanent stain on his nearly half-century political career.

“I don’t know. I don’t know,” said Hunter “The Leech” Biden, when asked whether he could have gotten a job making $50,000 a month from a Ukrainian gas company if his last name hadn’t been “Biden” at a time when his daddy was vice president of the United States.

“Probably not, in retrospect,” The Leech allowed. “But that’s — you know — I don’t think that there’s been a lot of things that would have happened in my life if my last name wasn’t Biden.”

Game. Set. Match.

That is all anybody needs to know about the Biden family and whether they were open for bribery in Ukraine or China or anywhere else in the world.

The key to understanding House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s coup conspiracy against the president has nothing to do with Mr. Trump’s phone call with the president of Ukraine. Instead, it has everything to do with all the fake Russia nonsense they have been barking about for the past three years — but are suddenly very quiet about today.

When was the last time you heard any major Democratic persecutor in Congress utter the word “Russia”?

As Sherlock Holmes would say, it is the dog that DIDN’T bark. Which brings us to the “whom” that Democrats are sacrificing all in an effort to protect: former President Barack Obama.

Currently, there are a handful of very, very serious probes by nonpartisan prosecutors bound by rules of fairness and due process looking into the origins of the Obama administration’s spying operation on the campaign of a political opponent at the height of the 2016 election season.

This is and always has been the most gravely serious matter in the whole fake Russia “collusion” saga. People go to jail for doing things like this in America. And it’s not just former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper or ex-CIA Director John Brennan and dirty FBI agents like Peter Strzok who face devastating consequences if it can be proved they used their massive government powers in an effort to destroy a political opponent.

It could reach deep into the White House. It could reach the top.

This is why Mrs. Pelosi has dropped Russia and collusion and stopped talking about the Mueller report or all the fantasies laid out in the “dirty dossier” that Democrats paid foreign agents to dig up on Mr. Trump from Russian sources.

It is also why Mrs. Pelosi refuses to run the current impeachment “inquiry” with even a hint of due process or fairness. If the minority — or the executive branch — were afforded the fairness that attended past impeachments, Republicans would gain subpoena powers to call witnesses.

Do you think Republicans might like to question Mr. Brennan or Mr. Clapper under oath about who authorized espionage against political opponents during the height of a presidential campaign?

Of course they would. But Mrs. Pelosi will never let them get that close to Mr. Obama.

So … Ukraine! Joe Biden be damned.

Contact Charles Hurt at churt@washingtontimes.com or on Twitter @charleshurt.

Originally posted on Washington Times https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/oct/15/joe-biden-democrat-sacrifice-save-obama-legacy/

Well, if it was not the plan it is looking like that’s the goal now. Sacrifice Joe, but will it keep us from getting to Obama? And why don’t we have Brennan’s and Clapper’s emails?

Not to mention there is a whole lot of dragging this out going on. It’s already three years post Obama and they’re getting around to it now? At this point we can only pray this will all be exposed, sometime. But of course the damage it and they did is already done.

Hillary: Romancing The Stars

Hillary is aiming for the stars, as evidenced by her fascination with women astronauts.

Now she’s trying to live vicariously through female astronauts. What won’t she do?

Hillary, you didn’t happen to save that letter from NASA, did you? I bet not.

But instead of pursing that career, Hillary ended up growing up and going to war with reality… being unable to even accept results of an election. Sort of the same thing!

Proving when you are detached from reality and principles, the sky is the limit.

However, she has continued to dabble in cyberspace and the physics of destroying evidence. She also earned a PhD in election rigging. No glass ceilings there.

Right Ring | Bullright

Fleecing Our Democracy

I get tired of how democrats always talk about our democracy as if it is some gold standard only they care about, which is etched in granite. But actually it is some gray matter where they can change rules and definitions at their convenience.

It’s rather ironic that they are the sole guardians and guarantors of it.

Early in the 2016 campaign, one of Trump’s chief criticisms that the system was rigged was not just a sound bite. At the same time he complained about it they were rigging and scheming the entire system. Hardly anything was out of reach or their will. They repeatedly trashed even their own rules to get the outcome they wanted. Even Bernie’s people saw it. But we didn’t then know how far they already had gone, or would yet go.

So it disturbs many of us when they talk about democracy on a pedestal. That is only the perception they want to sow in the public’s mind. Obviously, democracy means nothing to them, only power does. They don’t play by rules because rules are as flexible as their need and imagination.

They broke every precedent and “rule” they wanted in 2016 and no one was there to stop them. The collective conscience of Democrats does not exist.

We saw as well that conflicts of interest don’t exist for Democrats. They will even justify them. So when Joe Biden and his son created conflicts, it was only a figment of everyone’s imagination because they said so. If power is the main objective, then there are no rules, only what is necessary to achieve and use it – which is the whole point of it, to democrats. They cannot resist abusing power because that’s what it is there for.

They are masters at making excuses for the desecration of democracy as it gives them what they want. Usually the objective is more power — and more opportunities to abuse it.

Yet whenever we see one of those ridiculous protests the left churns out over something, their number one go to chant for a march or protest is: “This is what democracy looks like.” (Repeat x 10) The mental midgets of mobocracy believe it is democracy.

If what we see from the left is “democracy” then why would anyone want that? Sure, democracy is messy…. but it is not the pigsty, shithole that Democrats make of it. That is no gold standard for democracy. Fleecing democracy – and the people – is their expertise.

Right Ring | Bullright

There’s a whole lot of shaking going on

Syria: Kurds, PKK, Asaad, Turkey, Isis, Russia. Put then all together and what do you have? A whole lot of shaking.

Washington: Trump, Pelosi, Schumer, Durbin, Rand Paul, Republicans, Democrats. Put them all together and what do you have? A mess. Did I forget media?

All these, of course, represent factions. We have factions in the USA. Certainly, then, you cannot expect people to be all on the same page. They all have their own interests, and their own ideologies. Now I’m not one for letting ideology, unadulterated, run all policy.

Sure I succumb to an ideology like everyone. But this idea that ideology is the be all end all would mean all one has to do is plug in their ideology to any given situation and voila, you have the solution. But it doesn’t work that way.

That would not require politicians or leaders but only an ideology everyone must adhere to. That sounds more like a communist China or other regime, sans the dictator who enforces it all. So the Communist Party rules in China, the Democrat Party rules here.

Some things you have to make the case for, some things you have to fight for. Indeed, some things may be impossible — that is outside the dictator to implement and force it. In the US, we typically wrestle with such things. Other regimes don’t have those “problems.”

Case in point, Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer go to the White House to talk to Trump about problems in Syria. What do you think happens? Dems run out with their hair on fire, to the media, and say “the President had a meltdown”. Is any of all that predictable? Rather than just deal with an uncomfortable seat in the theater, Democrats would rather scream fire and run out. No, it isn’t proper but that is their predictable reaction.

But of course the only thing that Pelosi wants to deal with is her own caucus. She will immediately run out to fundraise off of it. Impeachment is actually the only thing on her caucus-craven mind. And how to guide that to a successful conclusion.

Damn the will of the people, damn 2016 elections, damn all immediate pressing problems, damn the volatile situation anywhere; full speed ahead on the impeachment train. Election 2020 is now the next destination. Ideology rules the sandbox.

Right Ring | Bullright

AOC Is Grief Stricken

The tears of a commie. I think what happened is AOC confused motherhood with mother earth and believes she is mother earth. Reminds me of an old margarine commercial.

AOC CRIES: Earth Facing ‘Extinction,’ ‘Dreams Of Motherhood Now Taste Bittersweet’

Daily Wire — Ryan Saavedra

Socialist Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) cried on Friday during a climate alarmist speech in Copenhagen at the C40 World Mayors Summit where she claimed that her “dreams of motherhood now taste bittersweet because of what I know about our children’s future.”

Ocasio-Cortez began her alarmist speech by claiming that humanity was at a crossroads of “extinction or opportunity,” adding that there is “no middle road” on climate policy.

“The climate crisis is already here,” Ocasio-Cortez claimed. “On this note I speak to you not as an elected official or public figure, but I speak to you as a human being — a woman whose dreams of motherhood now taste bittersweet because of what I know about our children’s future, and that our actions are responsible for bringing their most dire possibilities into focus. I speak to you as a daughter and descendant of colonized peoples who have already begun to suffer.”

“It is not a coincidence that these disasters get relatively little media coverage, and that even less of the coverage dares to mention climate change,” Ocasio-Cortez falsely claimed. Media coverage of natural disasters often get significant coverage, with “climate change” being one of the top points parroted by the media.

“It is not a coincidence that the truth is controversial,” Ocasio-Cortez continued. “None of this is a coincidence because climate change is not a coincidence or a scientific anomaly. Climate change is a consequence. It is a consequence of our unsustainable way of life.”

Ocasio-Cortez then suggested that capitalism promotes “lawbreaking pursuit of profit” and that capitalism only benefits “the very few,” despite the fact that capitalism has lifted more people out of extreme poverty than any other economic system.

Ocasio-Cortez then admitted that her far-left $93 trillion plan is really about “chang[ing] society” and “winning” in politics, and that the desired outcomes are to fix “injustice” and promote “equality.”

This is similar to what Ocasio-Cortez’s former chief-of-staff Saikat Chakrabarti admitted during an interview.

The Washington Post reports:

Chakrabarti had an unexpected disclosure. “The interesting thing about the Green New Deal,” he said, “is it wasn’t originally a climate thing at all.” [Sam Ricketts, climate director for Washington Gov. Jay Inslee (D)] greeted this startling notion with an attentive poker face. “Do you guys think of it as a climate thing?” Chakrabarti continued. “Because we really think of it as a how-do-you-change-the-entire-economy thing.” [emphasis added]

Article posted at Daily Wire

Well, no middle of her road. I’m not sure she is qualified to speak as a human being. All that Marxist stuff running through her veins would sort of contradict that.

No coverage on the “climate crisis?” That’s all they talk about. The MSM cannot cover a legitimate natural disaster without making it about climate change or Global Warming.

No, it’s not a coincidence or scientific anomaly …. it is pure politics and socialism, about defying all our freedoms and rights. They admit it isn’t about climate change; it’s about their agenda. So what are the consequences of that agenda?

What is really “unsustainable” is their socialist agenda and the supporting government for it. But it doesn’t look like anyone will address that problem soon enough.

Right on the heals of AOC’s statement, Bernie says Elizabeth Warren may be a “capitalist in her bones, but I’m not.” Nope, he’s a commie and past the socialist garden long ago. But he has it exactly backwards. Socialism only benefits few ringmasters, the puppet masters. It is meant to be a transformational thing — to our politics and economy. And they don’t really care about the dire consequences on either of them.

In a few years it will be “the day the music died” — her music and Bernie’s pied piper tune. I’m also wondering if she could be a poltergeist?

It is us who are in the real fight to save ourselves and country from the doom and gloom of AOC and her tribe of commie buddies. That’s a challenge. Why does that thought of someone calling AOC a mom bother me so much?

So maybe I have a little surprise for AOC and her commie pals. There are some things we ain’t ever going to see. And your socialist plans are right at the top of the list.

Narratives Demean Motives

On a serious note, I’m going to do something I never like or want to do but in the interest of critical understanding, I think I must do. It is a shame that circumstances should require that someone say these things. Yet those are the times we are in.

It is important to know why and I think that in itself is the reason to do it. I don’t do it out of animus for the country or what US stands for. It is for perspective in fighting the narratives radical leftists have foisted on us. We must know the enemy.

So with all the outrage about what happened with (A) a phone call to Ukraine and now (B) a report on what Trump told Kislyak in the famous White House meeting after Comey was fired and (C)Pelosi’s unilateral “official impeachment inquiry” started; there are a few loose ends and statements that need to be examined further.

Most of this is not new, but what is new is the level of the Left’s frenzy surrounding it all. Media is doing their level best to roll this into one big mud pie to fuel their impeachment efforts. Almost on cue as expected. They have no real concern or loyalty to the nation, nor do they care about the damage it does. They are willing to sacrifice everything about our country to try to get Donald Trump.

They have already referred to Trump recently in choreographed mobster terms. (Aka Don Corleone) When have we ever seen this before? Never. And they have their other favorite tool used to attack Trump, our intelligence — however they can use it and say whatever against a sitting president to hurt him. Another narrative is that Trump is somehow green-lighting the Russians to meddle in other countries’ elections. The idea Trump would have equated or admitted to Russia that, essentially, we meddled in elections and was not upset by what Russia did in our elections sounds damning. (the gaining media narrative)

Leftists are offended saying we don’t meddle in elections. Well, let’s just take Obama for example. He meddled in Egypt, Israel, and even his team in Canadian elections. He also basically intervened in the Brexit vote. I’m sure that is only scratching the surface. If it is one thing Obama liked to do, it was intervene in elections. I’m sure there is much to Putin’s claims of Hillary meddling in Russia’s election. At least most people in Russia believe State and Hillary did. And we know how some of that meddling turned out – not well.

We meddled in the control of the dictator, Colonel Muammar Gaddafi, in Libya by sanctioning his killing. To hell with elections, there’s always Plan B.

Let me cut the chase here with a bigger narrative yet to roll out. Whenever there are skirmishes or deep disagreements anywhere in the world, Russia is plotting on how it can extort the situation for their gain. Putin as I noted before is the consummate opportunist. Years back he took on an aura of a conservative leader causing people, like Pat Buchanan, to compliment what seemed a more traditional domestic approach. What’s not to like?

But not to be fooled, he was not the Harley-riding conservative fellow conservatives here may have envisioned, but only an opportunist who was carefully feeding people what they wanted to see and hear. He had family plans with incentives for having more children and a friendlier outreach toward Christians. Welcome changes one would think, in contrast with what we saw from Obama. The Planned Parenthood saint of death with an anti-Christian bigotry. He was happily riding a Sherman Tank over American traditions.

Now in the present situation, we are presenting more opportunities to Putin. The Left has brought impeachment, Trump hatred, controversy and a slice of corruption to the Ukraine. What better place for it? You might say controversy and corruption are no strangers there. And all is within Putin’s operating realm in the last few years. For people to get so choked up on corruption or domestic politics there, then be thrust in with a scandal involving the US, is made to order fodder for the opportunist Putin.

Just days ago the word spread that Putin has Russians dispatched in Libya operating in that current conflict where ISIS or terrorists are gaining a foothold and vying for political power. Sound familiar? Russia parlayed Syria into a net gain over humanitarianism, and the ISIS crisis into a greater strategic plan for Russia. Thanks John Kerry.

Now their attention is back on Ukraine, his long time nemesis. A new president taking office on an anti-corruption plan offers yet more opportunity for Putin’s insatiable appetite. In so many ways Democrats are once again playing right into the hands of a conniving Putin, with little restraint for involvement. As the smoke of controversy rises in the Ukraine, the cloud of Putin will gravitate to it like bees to honey. Cleaning up corruption, you say? We shall see what eats away at that agenda.

For the worst part in it all: what does Putin think, or what talking points might we expect to hear from the Kremlin on the subject? (it pains me to think it) You don’t have to worry about giving them ideas because they are old experts on propaganda. He might simply inject himself as a level mediator to all sides. He might propose some sort of deal to get the ball rolling, and emphasis off fixing corruption. He might make some offer to volunteer some help or guidance. But all those would be open holes created by zealous Democrats who’s only interest is attacking Trump. Putin doesn’t have to worry, because Democrats will provide him more opportunities than he could ever create for himself.

That’s what they did for him from the 2016 elections. To this day, Hillary and Democrats credit Russia — and particularly Putin — with achieving the outcome of our election. They credit Putin with more influence than he could have hoped for.

Not to ever leave out the king of corruption and influence in countries and elections, George Soros. In Ukraine, there have to be many connections along with the DNC. Soros and the orgs he supports are certainly not non-political either. More Soros influence will ooze out. A corrupt political system, what a fertile ground for Soros to operate? He can do a lot of damage there. So the Soros effect on Ukraine probably cannot be overstated.

Then there is the glaring takeaway lesson we gave to Russia on the 2016 election: that we don’t really care about or respect elections. When it comes down to it that is just talk. Actually Hillary just reminded us, once again, in the media that the 2016 election was illegitimate. How can you have more contempt for the electoral system than that?

Further troubling is the movement afoot to throw out the electoral college process — an inherent blueprint in the Constitution. Well, who really cares about the Constitution anyway? So the election did provide many benefits to a meddling Russia. If you have people in America who don’t even accept their own election process, or final results of it, then one serial meddler in Russia would have a whole lot to work with.

There remains a lot of space to fill by Russia’s narratives. And they are the masters at saturating the air with them and diverting public scrutiny. First off: is this an example of how America operates in other countries? See how they enrich themselves while really caring nothing for democracy they claim to love. That’s a great narrative.

And there are pleny more narratives the Russians can plug into current circumstances, custom created by the left, and our political feuds here. Just like all the foreign interference the left dabbled in with our last election. Call that a meddlers stew.

What really undermines our national security and credibility are Democrats. Everywhere you look they compromise our security. The claim that a phone call with Ukraine threatens our national security is ludicrous. But they want to impeach Trump over a foreign call, which is way too much foreign interference over our elections for me.

Imagine that — just as domestic policies at home are finally going in the right direction — they try to take Trump down over a foreign phone call. Do people care about it?

Right Ring | Bullright

Headed For Disappointment?

With all the political flares going off and the long awaited IG Horowitz report due out in a month, are we headed for a disappointment? I would hate to see the odds on that.

On Friday, two Ukrainians were arrested for election fraud, who were also associates of Rudy Giuliani. Already the attempt to connect him to any crimes is escalating. What’s new?

The Horowitz report is supposed to be shocking. I’ve heard every adjective imaginable to describe it as something that will shock the conscience. But I wouldn’t bet on that. I mean what could really shock the public’s conscience anymore? So that seems a bit overplayed.

The “conscience” is a very high bar.

But in the worst case scenario, Horowitz’s report does not go far enough and deep enough, then it could really be dismissed with a yawn. My bet is more on that. After all, there is another investigation led by Durham already cranked up which is supposed to be a deep dive. I expect the IG to take a pass to divert and fall short in view of that.

We seem to have been handed one disappointment after another on these investigations and probes since Hillary emailgate. Actually since Benghazi. The record is clear that Deep State has a way of covering up its tracks and protecting its own.

I think we could compare it to wild fires in California or out West. When they appear out of control and spreading, people who live there feel at a loss for what they can do. The same feeling could apply to the Deep State corruption and coup. At least with the fires you have hundreds of people working on them and putting them out is the only goal.

So judging by all this reaction to any real investigations, it seems like Trump has been the only person who could have brought this out and stirred it all up. But the mission has to be completed. That will take some creativity.

Disappointment my be right around the corner but the mission still goes on.

Right Ring | Bullright

Gender specific meets realism

I am having a hard time keeping up with culture these days. It could be just me, I’m not sure. I have finally realized that culture does change over time. I’ll give them that. How much it changes though, or should, is still up for debate in my view.

But the one thing that the evolutionists on the left always tell us is science is fact. And that is the way it is. Argue with that and they call you a denier. But if that is the case, then why do they keep trying to change science? I thought science was science.

Here is a simple example. Suppose you got into a time machine and went back to 1935. You walk into a senior science classroom to talk to them. Then you mention the words gender dysphoria and gender expansive. What do you think their reaction might be? No one would know what you are talking about or they could think you are joking.

Do that today and there might be one or two eye rolls but other than that everyone knows what you are talking about. “Oh, that.” They would probably get the drift pretty quick.

I decided since I am one of those people liberals always call a denier, phobic or neanderthal, then I should have an appropriate term for myself. I will label myself gender euphoric — which means I am very happy with gender the way it is, and have no inclinations to change it or the science behind it. I’m at peace with it and prefer people not try to redefine what is already defined. It should be settled science, as far as I’m concerned. .

But that would probably be exactly the wrong thing to be today because the left can accept any new definitions for sexuality, but they cannot accept or permit that one. Though in their way of defining it, a person’s final sex shall not be determined until they die. Then the evolution or chances of it are over.

Even in their way of thinking, my problem is not in keeping up with culture. No, they would label me a maladjusted adult due to my failure to adjust to their new definitions and standards. A cultural abomination. They can call it what they like and I’ll call it reality.

Right Ring | Bullright