By The Numbers

Here is why I think Joe Biden is way out in front of his skis. I did some math and here is what I came up with. He does not have the support they claim, or he thinks.

Biden supposedly had 80 million votes. (10.5 mi more than Obama’s ’08 record)
Trump had 74 million votes. (4.5 million more than Obama’s record)

Rasmussen reports found in its survey that, of Biden’s voters, only 56% of them really voted FOR Biden, Some 30% were really voting against Trump. The rest were unsure as to why they voted for Biden.

Of all Trump’s 74 million voters, 90% of them were solidly voting FOR Trump. Only 8% voted against Biden or other reason.

So based on those numbers, I made this deduction:
Biden’s 56% of 80 ml gives him a total of 44.8 million.
Trump’s 90% of 74 ml gives him a total of 66.6 million.

Who has far more support?

I think that Biden clearly has a support deficit of 34% against Trump. And the number of raw supporting voters were far less, about 12 million less than Trump.
Trump clearly had support among his voters, where Biden lacks.

So if you translate all this to real support, Biden has a 44% deficit bust among his voters. And he thinks that is enough to run a progressive agenda?

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2020

Special Counsel Delivery

A brand new joke: so a guy walks into a restaurant – back when they used to be open — and the waiter asks him “what would you like?”

The man says to the waiter “I’ll have a nice juicy special counsel.”

The waiter says, “coming right up, sir.”

Okay, it is a joke people. I didn’t say it was funny. Get it?

Now that we know AG Bill Barr converted John Durham into a Special Counsel that was the reaction of some people, “This is a joke.” But no it really wasn’t a joke. They only think it is a joke. It’s the guy at the restaurant who said he wants a special counsel, and is entitled to get what he wants. So give him what he wants.

Under U.S. code, the special counsel would produce a “confidential report” and is ordered to “submit to the Attorney General a final report, and such interim reports as he deems appropriate in a form that will permit public dissemination.”

If what I said doesn’t make sense at all, then don’t worry about it.

The important thing is that Barr appointed Durham Special Counsel without anyone knowing it on October 19th. Now he tells us what he did. I for one am glad.

Would I prefer not to have special counsels? Yeah, but after all we have gone through over five years, then let’s have the special counsel. If it were ever justifiable, this is it.

No, I don’t care to hear Leftist loons bemoaning about it. Done.

Well, it sure is not the last we are going to hear about or from this special counsel of ours. Just ignore that new-car smell, you’ll get used to it.

“I think there will be more indictments,” Ratcliffe said in October. “Based on the intelligence I have access to, I certainly believe there should be.”

Gee, I remember one Christmas saying “if I could have anything, I’d like to have a brand new special counsel.” Now here it is in 2020 and I finally got one. I’m not sure what to do with it but here it is. Once the training wheels come off, this thing will be great,

So that’s kind of the way I feel about this new Special Counsel.

It was the thought that counts. Appreciate the sentiments.

(Hope it has a warranty)

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2020

Dear Diary

[0600] Sorry, I haven’t written in some time. Well, it’s been so hectic and all. There has been a lack any good news, since I know you’d much rather hear good news. It’s just there hasn’t been any. Remember we always say ‘regnad’ for warning….

And it may be a while till I write again as work camps are going to start up in a few months. That’s how they’ll be rounding people up by communications. You know their capabilities on that. (NSC) Surveillance-R-US.

Oh, we are in a pandemic too. Remember how we always debated about that before? We finally have one. And wow are they politicizing it every way to Sunday.

In fact, the left even had a campaign election all based on the pandemic and politics of it. Upstaged a pandemic, believe that? Can you guess how that ended? Well, even a pandemic could not keep them from rigging an election. So perception is reality to radicals. Anyway, they got their wish, they worked hard enough at it.

Funny how for four years all we heard about is attacks on our democracy and tainted election results. I’ll be damned, they finally found a way to have the same troll bots they bitch about on social media vote in elections. Not a great situation now.

Even though the prez got 12 million more votes than the last time, no dice, not enough to outnumber the bots and fraud. Those Russians would laugh at that . These radicals are almost better at running a narrative on the public than Russians. People hear the shit and don’t know what to think. They know how to muddy up the water.

Word is the same law firm for Hillary’s campaign, Pukin, is now defending this sham election. Guess they’re out of the dossier business for now. Probably contracting for Deep State too.

You know how the Left always controlled the media complex. Media consolidated with the Big tech and left too. What a merger spawned in hell. Anyway that has been the worst part, hearing all the lies propagated all the time. I got their climate change right here. And their ignorance techniques at corruption are stunning.

Soon you won’t be able to believe a damn word in the airwaves unless it comes out of a Resistance patch line. Few of them still around.

Surprise, no interest in looking at all that happened in the extended election. All smooth as silk, they say. For who? Don’t make be laugh. From the Susquehanna to the Monongahela in PA they finally know the truth, but it seems not a damn thing they can do about. Russians had nothing on this pack of rabid commies.

All this was entirely predictable though. Forewarnings were everywhere. We knew what they’d do. Trump kept telling anyone who would listen. Oh right, the guy from his campaign bunker in MD that could not campaign, happened to get got over 12 million more votes than Barry did? No questions asked. What fraud, they ask?

But the real resistance to it survives and thrives; they can’t take that away. They may get a few of us but they can’t get us all.

So I don’t know how many more entries you’ll get from me in the next 6 months, Looks like the S will HTF in DC the third week in January. The progressives – what a name for a bunch of retrogressive commies – aim to lay siege on the capitol and who knows how fast they’ll move to crack down?

The same social media comrades are screaming for camps and reeducation to begin. Well, most of em don’t believe in reeducation – not that they believed much in real education either. They have a final solution in mind and don’t mind saying so. But camps will do at least to satisfy their foaming mouths.

A sad sight it will be. Don’t know yet if Old Glory will still fly above the White House when they get their way. I mean, what difference at this point does it make to them?

The Comrades stalled off their last riots planned for after election. So there is one in the Left’s breach, just waiting to erupt in synergy. You know their forte for fire and looting. They can’t go long without lighting up something and threatening anyone.

So we’re all wondering if this is really what the end of the Republic looks like? There’s not a lot of optimism. These commies got their fervor cranked up. Wrath of the Left.

I can’t even tell other people what do. Guess they have to figure that out with the rest of us. You’d think progs would have tried to keep that election lie alive for next time. Actually I don’t think they care anymore. This was the finale.

A few of the notorious commies on MSNBS announced that all the incoming regime should have it stamped on their forehead – and don’t think it was hyperbole – that “deficits don’t matter!” (Extra emphasis) So this is their doctrine of operation? I’m guessing so. You know how sometimes they tell you straight out.

The printing presses won’t be able to keep up with them.

I’ll try to fill you in with an update in a few weeks. I hate to keep you waiting. But ain’t much good news to report. It’s all bad. So the pandemic turned into just another excuse, or opportunity as they call it, for another run on the will of the people.

Not pretty at all.

You take care old friend and keep your head down, this is going to get ugly. Keep praying for us out there. He’s all that hears us now.

My best, that’s all I got.

PS: Looks like the old guard Deep State is running the whole shit show now.

Vive la US,… or what’s left of her now!

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2020

Good vs. Evil

In 2020, the age-old debate over good versus evil still rages on. Or should that be battle? But is there any way to score the current landscape?

To judge the levels of which is winning or losing, I have a simple test.

What is the amount or saturation level of evil in society? Start by asking a question: what is the cost of doing the right thing? The answer is a good indication of the level of evil.

Ideally it used to be doing the right thing because it was the right thing to do, was just the rule. It was appreciated or even praised. And that was it. But that has changed.

It can be more complex these days.

Now doing the right thing can have consequences. There can be penalties. Sometimes one pays a stiff price for doing the right thing. Not always. Well, it could even be a heavy price at times. If you think about it realistically, you can see those areas.

So I think that cost is directly relative to the amount of evil there is. Not to oversimplify it; I’m not saying that is a hard rule in all situations but in general.

You could take that to another level with the amount of good or evil in the public sector. Consider what Trump tried to do. Consider the amount of resistance, by Resisters, to give you an idea what I mean. There is certainly a lot of resistance..

Then look at the resistance or cost inflicted by Antifa or BLM protestors in riots or looting. It drives the cost of doing the right thing higher. Look at the ability of cops to prevent it.

Look at how many cops were murdered for just doing their job. So I think all that, and the tally of the cost, is a reasonable indicator to the saturation level of evil there.

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2020

What Do You Think?

There is a quote I recall frequently. I’m not much of a quote person but this one stuck with me for decades now. Some quotes are rich.

“Just when you figure out how the game is played, they change all the rules.”

There may be a few sources for that in various forms, But my source is from a man in a testimony to congress over 25 years ago. That person was Donald J Trump. It seemed to apply then and it applies now.

Another favorite quote that held up was from Ronald Reagan:

“It isn’t so much that liberals are ignorant. It’s just that they know so many things that aren’t so.”

Faulty DNA

Some people may be surprised to know I am a highly-accredited academic. For instance, I believe I found the exact DNA string that leads to the destruction of the country.

So preemptively interrupting or blocking that sequence would prevent our disintegration before it’s too late. Isn’t science wonderful? If only we listened to it… ie. political science.

This discovery took over 30 years of experimentation, yet it’s not too late to save America.

I will use elections as an example for the sake of illustration. Applied science, you know. The premise of the problem is: the loser gets to define the agenda and results of the election. I’ll call this ‘loser rules’ principle. It only happens on one side of the DNA pool.

You may laugh but this has become a growing perception for some time now. I’ve been studying it. It’s widely accepted too. And that is the problem. The more this malicious code grows, the faster the disintegration process happens.

Allow me to map this out. Don’t worry if you did not understand it at first. It took me a while to track this mutation down.

So just say the radical left loses an election. Those who lose get to determine the agenda, or sizable chunk of it, no matter who won. Thereby corrupting other DNA in the sequence.

That process, over time, leads to disintegration and eventual destruction.

And this malicious sequence is being applied right before our eyes and yet we do not or cannot seem to stop it in its tracks. The worst part of it is the very people(members) in that DNA pool continue to mislabel this as a great democratic process, and the product of it as a solution to our problems. Still don’t quite see it yet?

Say loser X has all these radical plans and ideas from who knows where, whatever source. Though it did lose. At the end of the election, Loser X says its ideas were so popular among members that those ideas must be incorporated into the mainstream.

If winner refuses, Loser X will unleash its radical dogs in the base to attack. So the winner is compelled to oblige X. Winner W has no choice except appease Loser X by incorporating the ideas and radicals to implement them into the mix. Let’s call that mixture “S”.

Mixture S now thinks that process is just the cost of doing any business or pushing a major agenda forward. So radical ideas and people are employed that contaminate the agenda – and whatever influence mixture S has on the public at large.

This assures the most radical ideas always come to the surface to be incorporated.

Now if this is repeated over and over, it leads to getting the worst and most radical ideas into the mainstream and into the public. In repetition, the result is a disintegrating effect on the whole. Well, it could hardly be a good outcome.

So the host becomes more contaminated over time. Speed is the only variable.

Oh so you need some examples? No matter who wins, the loser claims the right to determine actions in the wider agenda. See, the Democrats lose in congress, they assert the right to determine what the body will do. Radicals are highly effective at influencing it.

Say Hillary Clinton loses. They claim she really didn’t and that they are now free to delegitimize the entire process, hence corrupting it. No matter what winner Trump does forward, they contaminate the entire process however they can. Thus affecting the outcome, or perceived outcome, of everything.

Another example is the minority rules principle. Wait for a national emergency then demand the body agenda implement the radical minority’s plans. So Rad-Loser offers winner no other choice or option. Incorporate radical plans or else.

The loser always determines the agenda, or in effect the minority determines the agenda.

The result of this process playing out, over and over, creates a scenario. This maliciously corrupt law or code demands the worst ideas be implemented at the sacrifice or exemption of good ones, So the end pool is corrupted downward. It is a beautifully destructive force.

The entire DNA pool has become so corrupted that many of its fervent members now see this process as ‘normal’ and the resulting disintegration as ‘progress.’

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2020

Smaller Goverment

Once again, a poll comes out near and dear to my heart that I cannot resist mentioning. It only validates what we already knew. Turns out, most people are really not stupid.

Most Reject Big Government But Expect Biden to Grow It Anyway

Rasmussen– Tuesday, November 24, 2020

Most voters continue to view big government as a problem and don’t want it, but they strongly suspect that more government and higher taxes are on the way with Joe Biden in the White House.

A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey finds that 59% of Likely U.S. Voters agree with the late President Reagan’s inaugural declaration that “government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem.” Just 27% disagree, while 14% are undecided.

This is the highest level of agreement with Reagan’s statement since Rasmussen Reports first asked this question in 2008

See survey

Most Voters Still See Government As A Problem

Rasmussen Thursday, December 13, 2018

President Ronald Reagan said in his first inaugural address in 1981 that “government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem,” and voters still agree.

A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey finds that 56% of Likely U.S. Voters agree with Reagan’s statement that government is the problem, while 30% disagree. Fourteen percent (14%) are not sure. Reagan’s name was not mentioned in the question.

See.

 

So in conclusion:
If only about 30% want bigger government, then why in the world would we elect someone to grow and expand government? (or raise taxes) And they lecture us about democracy?

Accountability Zero

Why does this country have such an accountability deficit? To weigh that, I looked into both sides. I see a lot of the same problems within. Guess where it comes from?

It requires a quick trip down memory lane just to illuminate the problem.

Take it back to 2016. I’ve written much about that primary and the nomination shake out. In the end, Trump had the nomination then won the race. Start right there.

The reason he won had much to do with the lack of accountability in the same old establishment politics and process. So people got fed up and wanted to reign in power.

Okay, so it was nasty and we know what happened. Once elected, the Left planted their feet in resistance. Again, expected. As Trump started to line up his cabinet and team, remember what happened? More resistance on everything he did.

The left said they would brand everyone who took a job in the administration. They wanted a full boycott of Trump positions. Fortunately, Trump was picking from a different pool and managed to find enough people willing to serve.

That did not stop the left though. Then they threatened anyone who took a position that they would not work in DC again. But the officials did so anyway, putting it on the line.

If these threats were not enough to keep them from joining, then what were the benefits, if any, of joining Trump’s administration? I don’t know about all, except there was an idea positive results would prevail over time, and on what they would accomplish. If they hung in, those results would vindicate them. People would see it and feel the outcome.

So there was risk but was worth a chance because they were going to change status quo, which had not gotten positive results. Plus Trump was making a point to put America First instead of last. Team Trump had no interest in leading from behind.

But the Lockstep Left was out to make that as hard as possible – hopefully to drive Trump out. Those are facts. Democrats made no secret of it, from boycotting his inauguration to keeping an investigation going as a basis for removal. Again, undisputed facts.

Trump operated in that backdrop despite protests and sedition. The administration went to work to prove all their ignorant assumptions wrong. Well, those results/outcomes should have satisfied most people, other than hard-line Marxists, or staunch anti-Trumpers – for their own reasons. That should satisfy the people en masse.

One must go through the entire primary context to see what people wanted and what they opposed. But one demand was accountability. If we got that much, it would help correct our entire course. Many of us believed eventually we would get that accountability. It might take some work but we would get it, one way or another.

So accountability was further defined. It was just basic accountability that we should expect from government but until then was totally absent. We were not asking much.

Threats on Trump and his administration continued. It evolved into an impeachment over a phone call. It offered a hint. That call was about accountability for what Biden-Obama did in foreign affairs, like Ukraine. Selling out the country was real — not in regards to Trump but regarding Biden and Obama. We know where that ended up.

Fast forward, we had an election that the Left cheered as a Biden victory. But hold your horses, it was not that clear. Never mind, says the Left, we got this. But no one else asked any accountability questions of Biden. Then they moved to start Biden’s team for 2021.

And this completes the tale of accountability.

I’m not disputing it all, just stating what they did. Along the way, they declared everyone who had worked in the administration or supported Trump be blacklisted. Remember they started that way. Sure enough, Dems were taking names telling people they would not work in public or private sectors again. What had Trump done?

Actually he was pretty successful. And the left kept insisting this election was about the pandemic, which they politicized and weaponized. The positive results still stand, too numerous to list. Democrats claimed the election was accountability for leadership.

Democrats wanted revenge against Trump, and everyone to pay. They call this some kind of twisted accountability – redefining the term. Remember mpeachment, investigations fell flat, They call this accountability? All the good they refuse to talk about.

Now if you boiled all of it down to a common denominator, it is accountability. The left wants an accountability, like revenge, to prevent it from happening again, Therefore, blacklisting is accountability. They redefined the term.

Conservatives on the right want real accountability. That’s all it was ever about to us. Simply to hold those accountable for what they did. Is that too much to ask?

The differences are crystallizing in recent events. Look how they are treating Trump and anyone connected to the administration. Now look at the team Biden is putting together. Any echoes or hints of accountability? It’sthe opposite; a slap in the face.

We see old guard, swamp creatures who were part of the problems for a decade. Sullivan, Kerry, Biden, Antony Blinkin, Rice. Plenty more to come, drawn from that same pool.

Biden set out to plant deep state creatures back into government to shore up its operation. His slogan is “build back better.” Really? That means deep state. Joe Biden’s people are also inquiring within bureaus and departments about any changes Trump made. So the first mission is reverse changes. Revert to the deep state paradigm.

They do know how to do that, they created it.

Now Dems will assure us they are very responsible, that they will be held accountable. Complete nonsense. Accountability is what they are programmed to prevent..

However, look at this political jihad against Trump people. Biden’s people have been a part of this contortion and corruption of government for decades. No accountability for that.

But those career Swamp-insiders are not scorned, blacklisted, harassed or banished from public or private sectors. They are swooned over and welcomed. If not in government, they are sought as experts in media — as advocates of effective, rational government.

Unaccountability has been normalized and institutionalized.

Accountability is starting to look like fools’ gold, where only fools think it is real.

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2020

Hey Hey, Ho Ho

Well that was pretty fast Globalist Joe, so you’re on your way?

Welcome to another episode of ….
“As the Radical Rolodex Spins”

Hosted by Number 2 of the Coup

Deep State Coup, No. 2 has some payback for you!

Fruits And Nuts Debut On CNN

Today I am going to delve into a very dark place with spirits of hatred and bitterness so pronounced that it could curl your toenails. .

But first, this place broadcasts openly calling itself the purveyor of facts and the go to source for news — at least in airport terminals and waiting rooms across America.

That place, otherwise known by the letters CNN, is not a place I recommend but if you go there, you may be stained for life. It could even give one nightmares. Take this particular episode of Anderson Cooper 360, guest hosted by John Berman.

The panelists included David Gergen, Douglas Brinkley. And Gergen with Caroline Cohen authored a piece for CNN on the Trump/Biden transition as a discussion primer.

Gergen Tweets::

It has become clear that Trump & Co are deliberately trying to sabotage the Biden presidency. Some 50 million Americans appear to believe Biden is illegitimate. We have never seen this before & it is quite dangerous.”

Sabotage, Really? Never? I’m shocked!

Excerpts:

“This is a big deal in our national life. As the Reuters reporters wrote, the widespread rejection of the election results among Republicans “reflects a new and dangerous dynamic in American politics.”

“Doing the math, that means on the day Biden takes the oath of office, over 50 million Americans will believe he is an illegitimate president. Collectively, they could be a powerful political force for years to come. Though opposing parties have questioned the legitimacy of elections in the past, never before have such beliefs been grounded in a calculated campaign of misinformation.”

”Never before has the opposition undermined the legitimacy of a new president before he has even taken office to anything like this degree or in this fashion.” [Factcheck that one!– BBC]

“It’s important to remember that this hasn’t happened by accident. It is increasingly clear that for months, Trump and his campaign surrogates have engaged in a systematic effort to kneecap Biden and his presidency. In the lead-up to the election, Trump repeatedly questioned the legitimacy of mail-in ballots and suggested he wouldn’t accept the results of the election if he lost. In short, this has been a deliberate campaign of sabotage, undertaken with scant regard for how much damage it may inflict upon our democracy.”

“[Trump] expects to gain political influence from the millions of people who believe in him more fervently than they do in our democratic traditions.”

On A/C 360, Brinkley agreed with Gergen claiming it is bizzaro. Then he questioned the sanity of Trump, predicting Biden may not succeed in unifying the country and that Trump probably doesn’t go to the swearing in.

The piece suggests opposition to Biden is a threat, worrying how it could be stopped. One conclusion seems to be betting on Trump investigations to continue harassing him.

So their wishful strategy has become clear if it wasn’t before election — try to marginalize Trump and no doubt his supporters. Their fear is Trump could inhibit Biden’s agenda.

Well, guess what, to Gergens and the Brinkleys, we are not going away. And the tens of millions of people, 73 by their count, are not going to cover our heads or go away.

Maybe you will grow some self-awareness to see the pendulum swings both ways. All you have done to Trump for his entire term, and now you would prefer some semblance of calm, unity, or kumbaya for Biden and will feel cheated if you don’t get it? Come on, man!

Well, welcome to reality and it’s a bitch.

You honestly expect that people would forget the way Trump was treated by the media and Left, who now want to prop up Biden? And forget the Swamp that tried to take him down. You’re kidding. CNN even hired the lawless, discredited former officials.

So Number 2 of the coup is getting no pass from us.

But it does sound like some people are getting a little worried about reality.

Right Ring | Bullright

Hypocrisy In Spades

There is no need to restate all that happened for four years of undermining President Trump and the 2016 election, right from the moment he won let alone ran.

However, the current situation is reporters are seen ambushing officials and authorities, like Michigan’s, with shouts of “will you honor the will of the people?”

No phrase could be more insulting or hypocritical to me than that. Maybe it is by design? I don’t know. Coming from the very people who never honored the will of the people.

In fact, they did everything they could to subvert and deny the will of the people. They undermined our electoral system with fabrications and dismissed criminal conduct.

Now they erase it all as if that election were never attacked. Then have the audacity to ask, “will you honor the will of the people?” There is nothing more repulsive.

On top of that 4-year record, compounding it with all Democrats did in this election, to utter those words just disgusts me. I rest my case.

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2020

Biden Transition Needs Access?

I have a semi-serious question. Does anyone think Biden and his team of intellectual thugs are sitting in a room just fretting over when and whether they can get access for their transition team to work with the White House? And how fast?

Or are they more aptly conniving and honing their strategy to keep us from knowing what they will do, and what it will do to the country? And keeping it all from the country?

I bet on the later. But that answers the first part. They aren’t so concerned about the transition as much as they are in fooling people about everything they will do. (dependent on media to keep us ignorant.) Democrats don’t have whistleblowers; no one talks.

So this would mean their complaints are a pure ruse that Biden is concerned about the transition, and how any delays may cost time and lives. They don’t actually care about that. They would only use the dead for political fodder anyway. That is not hyperbole.

This mad rush to get Biden in the loop is so preposterous. The guy who was co-pilot in the last administration. If he doesn’t know the job or his way around the place now, then he should never have run for the job. The people around him are career insiders. They just had a four-year break. So they are only returning. Need to get up to speed? Please.

Need to get briefed on all the vaccine distribution plans? Give it a rest. Biden ran on Covid and had all those elaborate plans to fix everything, didn’t he? He’s the mad scientist of pandemics. He’s the guy with all the plans, which is why gullible people voted for him.

He was a useless sidekick for Obama before but now he is Einstein. The White House is his lightning bolt and the world is his grounding rod. Who needs any access with that?

He’s supposed to have all the answers. He had the answer for Flynn, using the Logan Act. Now his team needs information? Ironic, the co-captain of the coup needs information.

National security? Well, that never bothered him or Obama before — not for a second.

So….number 2 of the coup is looking out for you?

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2020

Politics Of A Pandemic

Everyone now knows how bad an epidemic is. As if we needed a lesson on that. Indeed, it is a powerful thing. But how powerful?

Yes, a pandemic is powerful, not only how it can kill people.

But we have learned that a pandemic was powerful enough to determine who should be President of the United States and our way of life. Who knew a pandemic could do that?

Well, it even determined how we would run elections. It determined who were the winners and losers in the economy. It determined how we should educate our kids or work.

It is a very omnipresent thing, this Chinese virus from hell.

Why stop there? It should also determine world economic affairs. It should determine our global warming agenda. It can create a Great Reset. It can determine our economic system, our energy source. It should also determine what governments can do to citizens under the guise of an emergency.

“There is an urgent need for global stakeholders to cooperate in simultaneously managing the direct consequences of the COVID-19 crisis. To improve the state of the world, the World Economic Forum is starting The Great Reset initiative.” — [from Great Reset forum site]

It is no joke. They can do all this, or anything they want, under the auspices of a “pandemic.” That means they have found a way to politicize even a pandemic. And then they easily find ways to weaponize it against every faucet of our society.

Now no one likes a pandemic. No one hopes for one. But few could have expected the ways in which it could be used against the people as a weapon. If you had serious issues about the expanse of government power before, then this tool put your fears on another level.

For instance, we also learned this pandemic could determine rules and authorize freedoms of speech, religion or assembly. And it could be weaponized to limit those rights, too.

So if you did not see a pandemic as a national security issue as well, you were in for a surprise. It was not a matter of determining rights or banning them, it was essentially a manner of control.

This China virus gave ruling elites carte blanche to do what they will to people. Connect it to global economic policies and you have a cocktail from hell.

A forum in June with world leaders inspired them all to use the pandemic to push as much globalism, climate change policy as they could. Think of the pandemic as an opportunity to install their agenda. You might call it the new green deal-maker.

“Every country, from the United States to China, must participate, and every industry, from oil and gas to tech, must be transformed,” wrote Klaus Schwab, the founder and executive chairman of the World Economic Forum, in an article published on WEF’s website. “In short, we need a ‘Great Reset’ of capitalism.” – The Hill

If that were not bad enough, then any cure or vaccine easily presents another good opportunity to control people. Or, as Zeke Emanuel sees it, we need to determine who does or doesn’t get the vaccine. Of course age limits need to determine that. And a magical 75-year life span would be a good cutoff for the use of valuable resources like medicine.

Everyone see where all this is going? Turns out a pandemic can be a very useful thing, even a tool. The virus as a huge political opportunity Leftist who politicized and weaponized the entire apparatus extort it so easily that I bet many kids will not realize the way in which the pandemic was used like a tool to control or influence their lives.

But now the Left has done something even more amazing than grant all this authority to it, it has personified a pandemic into a rogue dictator that gets to control your life. It is no longer a thing. The Democrats, however, can hide their deeds behind it which keeps them unaccountable for the actions. Who knew a pandemic was that powerful?

Think about that Great Reset button next time Democrats say they are following science.

 

Exhibit B: Justin Trueau at UN conference September 29, 2020

“This pandemic has provided an opportunity for a Reset. This is our chance to accelerate our pre-pandemic efforts to re-imagine economic systems that actually address global challenges like extreme poverty, inequality, and climate change.” — J. Trudeau, reported by Climate Depot

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2020

The Obama Onion

So Obama is not done agitating and torturing America. He trots out yet another memoir, couched as a bio, to attack all his political enemies. Nice work if you can get it.

No, it doesn’t have to be true. He can just project all his demented thoughts and motives into other people, like any fiction writer would do. Make them into whatever he wants.

Paint them all as sinister characters in his rise to “the Promised Land” – which he doesn’t seem to have found yet. Nor could he because his distaste for America is something he will never swallow. Why let all that animosity go when it got him this far, and he’s still making money off of it?

He should have called the first of a 2 volume set “The Obama Onion” — raw onion.

Obama says in a new memoir: [excerts in The Atlantic]

‘My very presence in the White House triggered a deep-seated panic’

“Through Palin,” Obama writes, “it seemed as if the dark spirits that had long been lurking on the edges of the modern Republican party – xenophobia, anti intellectualism, paranoid conspiracy theories, an antipathy toward black and brown folks – were finding their way to centre stage.”

Instead of a book about his own experience, clearly his main objective is to define and attack his opponents, smearing those he felt like taking aim at. But trying to do that in a way cunning enough that his words add legitimacy to it, since he gets to define them.

Remember it was actually the entrance of Sarah Palin in 08 that caused panic through Obama’s campaign.  (or his résumé as I call it) And it was not darkness, antipathy or xenophobia that did that. He uses his bio to slime and define his enemies?

What hemorrhages out of his statements is not OURS but Obama’s own bitter resentment toward people, particularly those who don’t accept his brand of radical and racial politics.

But what exactly did all these people do to Barack Obama? Where did they stop or prevent him from anything in his life? He sure needs a crutch and a grudge.

Promised land? Later he explained his choice for that title saying “I’m not yet ready to abandon the possibility of America.” Generous. And the timing of it and the ‘book tour?’

Right Ring | Bullright

Institutional Chaos Usurps Elections

If you are not living under a rock or on a secluded island somewhere, then you have no doubt heard that Donald Trump has attacked and weakened our most valuable institutions in this country. Since we all care so deeply about them.

And no doubt you have heard it on a loop. It gets no response or push back in part because it sounds so awful. That is crazy talk but look no further than Democrats for destruction.

The people who have attacked and weakened our institutions are the Left and their droid Democrats. But you will never hear that reported anywhere. It is just not a story.

However, it did take Donald Trump to come along to frame and prove their narrative so wrong. It was Republicans who were first tagged with that blame banner, as if we were anti-institution or even anti-democracy. But Democrats took it to the stratosphere when it came to Trump and his reelection. Basically he is the blame for everything.

As usual, it was the left who has attacked our institutions and rule of law itself. They’ve branded border control the problem; they’ve attacked and called for defunding the police. They want to reimagine everything they don’t like – or everything not already politicized enough for their taste. Even energy, the economy or climate are targets.

And they have done a good job at that. They’ve weakened almost everything America values including education and our history, and even culture itself.. While sheer destruction of them is not their goal, they want institutional subservience to their political ideology.

Now no one can blame Trump for all that, or even conservatives. The left has done this with such passion; it was clearly their agenda for years.

But in 2020, they went the ultimate step in their evolutional demise of institutions. The one last thing that remained was our electoral process. Yes, they had attacked it for four years after Trump was elected. They were not only attacking us, the voters, but also undermining, politicizing and weaponizing the system itself. The cover they used is that they were worried about the integrity of the process, ie our trust in it.

Then they went full scorched earth by making all the changes and reforms they had schemed up before, but now had the chance to shove into place. True to radicalism, they didn’t care how they went about it as long as they got it all into place.

These plans themselves would do more to tear down the fabric around our elections than anything else. And as we now know, once you break the bond between the people and our electoral system, you have weakened democracy. The effect goes much further than that because they shredded people’s credibility in that system.

Like I said, they spent four years weakening the foundations. Now they have abolished the sacred trust between us and our elections. Once again, you cannot blame that on Trump which is exactly what they have in mind.

They are going to say it was Trump who kept attacking them by scaring people about “rigged” or “fixed elections.” No, he was only describing what they were doing, almost preemptively. Did he know the lengths they would go to in blowing up the system? I don’t know, but he certainly warned us loud and clear. And the left did not like him warning us. They didn’t want us to know or believe it.

The thing is our electoral system was just the last piece that they hadn’t quite altered enough for their political palate. They were not going to stop until they got the guaranteed results, read outcome, they wanted. A pandemic and Trump’s reelection offered them the opportunity they were waiting for. Trump was only an excuse for it, not the cause of it. This was their doing all the way.

Elections were merely the last, most important piece to complete their agenda. They had already shattered our credibility in things like the Justice Department, the FbI or IRS targeting conservatives. We found the Left had taken over everything in our government under the rubric of Deep State. And Americans lost confidence in all the institutions over years anyway; this was only the final straw. Media and press was already shot through.

But until now, we had at least expected our election system was basically in tact, even with all their shenanigans attacking it the last four years. Now they removed the façade that we could still trust our elections to operate above the proverbial Leftists fray.

Trump warned of the pending doom in the 2020 elections all through his campaign. Media mocked him saying he was attacking it. That clever game of blame they always play.

Now that we are handed the results of their non-stop plots for months, and see it for what they did, just like their other schemes for five years, we can validate in spades all the damage they have done. However, it does fit the pattern perfectly.

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2020

Hiding Biden

There is a theory that a Biden residency would only be a stark reminder of all the problems with status quo politics and how bad things can be. The dark winter candidate, indeed.

It definitely is an insult to turn the clock back to the Obama years, as if it were the answer. In eight years, they could not show us the benefits or how we were better off for all their radicalism and specious globalism — leading from behind, chanting “don’t do stupid shit.”

It only proved that Americans did not want that.

In fact, this election demonstrated people don’t want socialism. They don’t want globalist tyranny. When socialism and radicalism are on the ballot, people reject it.

But those were always on the ballot with Obama, only people chose not to see it. When faced directly with it, people are repulsed by the ideas. Marxism is not attractive.

A return to Biden, in the wake of Obama misery, would be a forced reminder of corruption, politics of status quo, ruling class elites and the establishment we had rejected.

It will only be a reminder of our real, true resistance to all that assails the American dream. A regime so ideally simpatico with all that becomes a giant flashing light. So this charade cannot go on unabated, unchallenged. It becomes a symbol for the evil it generates.

That will conjure to the fore all that Biden, with Obmma as well, are hiding. The corruption of Joe is a metaphor for it all. A reminder of what we oppose, exposed in broad daylight.

A term of rejection

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2020

Peaceful Transfer Of Power

Have any more deceitful and radicalized words ever been used toward an election, or its outcome, than peaceful transfer of power? The acronym PTP works for me.

So the people who authored the most contentious, unpeaceful, undemocratic and protested transition in American history now lecture us about a peaceful transition of power.

First of all, can anyone tell me anything Democrats do peacefully? What have they done? Violence and threats are usually the appetizer or chaser for whatever plans they have up their sleeve. But now they are in flower-child mode. Climb aboard the peace train.

Interesting too that they haven’t complained about the anti-peace rallies all summer. They only got concerned when they thought riots and violence could hurt them in the election.

Did you hear them complaining about Portland or Seattle and those, achem, peaceful transitions of power? Did they caution Antifa or BLM about peaceful transfers of goods when they looted and burned neighborhoods? Not much of a peace movement there.

But I don’t think a coup qualifies as a peaceful transition of power either.

One would almost think what Democrats really desire is a non-peaceful transfer of power, to coincide with their corrupted democracy. That does seem to excite them.

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2020