Biden’s Campaign Is Off And Running

How does it feel, America? The grifter Geriatric President is running all over the country spending all his time, on taxpayers money, using all the assets of the presidency at his disposal attacking you and campaigning against us.

His speeches are non-stop attacks against the American people, nothing else. Well he can’t remember or name the candidates running, so it’s only us he focuses on.

We are one giant basket of MAGA to dementia Joe. And we aren’t even on the ballot. That doesn’t matter to nasty Joe. It’s supposed to be an election for representatives, not a Spanish Inquisition against his enemies as he pleases.

Midterm elections is a green light and excuse to attack citizens of this country. And he relishes every chance he gets to demonize us.

Oh, and if you think that you are not the target of his attacks, then you better think again. Smell his jet fumes and listen to him. He has already put all of it in motion. He won’t talk about the 87,000 IRS agents he is unleashing on us. Then use the department of disinformation to crack down on us. Or labeling parents terrorists, sicking FBI on them for going to school board meetings. Dissent is a threat to the country or “democracy.”

Don’t think a guy who talks like that about what a threat the people are is not going to follow through on hatred for the will of the people. He doesn’t like any dissent, which does not fit into his plan. Democrats are already goading him to start locking people up.

You can bet the DOJ and Feds are listening to every word, following his marching orders. It’s what they do rather than working for public security interests.

So he’s actually crisscrossing the country campaigning against Americans.
No, we aren’t on the ballot, but we are on the target list.

Right Ring | Bullright | 2022

Age Of Diversions: how scandal is done

Against all obvious risks, the apparatus of DOJ decided to create a Biden scandal by raiding Mar-a-Lago, as a diversion for the Afghanistan pullout anniversary. An act which cost him much of the support he had from the lost in space crowd.

This was the plan.

Do it when Congress goes out of session and when Biden is skipping off to vacation on an island — now there is a metaphor — so he can claim some physical separation with what is really happening. Just as Obama always heard about stuff later in media, like us, and claimed plausible deniability. And like Obama wanted a third term to be behind the scenes calling the shots and running government.

Obama: Stick with me now, Joe, you can do this. It will create a diversion from Afghanistan. Dems and media love a raid. Then roll it into midterms.

Joe, then you can always do a college loan bailout. Trust me, Afghanistan when your approval tanked is old news in the rear view mirror. They won’t even realize it. It’s your comeback, kid! Keep talking about Trump.

Even you can’t fuck this up, Joe. People love seeing FBI raids on their enemies more than grieving 13 dead anonymous Americans in a place they know nothing about. Sheesh. Give them an August to remember and light that fire for the midterms. Kill some sacred babies, Joe. You can handle this. Sure it’s political, so what? Who cares? They want heads, give them heads.

Biden: so Garland is in the loop on this?

Obama: Man, he is the loop. Why do you think I nominated him to SCOTUS? It’s great, it also covers up those anti-cop, Soros policies. We all love Fed’s and law enforcement now, don’t we? Wray will do anything for you if you give him some support back. Who doesn’t like an investigation? It’s not a scandal, it’s Joementum.  And don’t forget the fundraiser, Joe! ~


Right Ring | Bullright | 2022

Tales Of Two Anniversaries

The US is in the immediate anniversary of the Afghanistan pull out which bequeathed us the worst national foreign policy failure in modern time. History will not be kind

It’s been a year and we still don’t yet know all the ramifications. But it is as scandalous as anything else Biden has done since taking office. What else could we expect from America’s first Geriatric President? If you can count the lies in this one, you deserve a medal. We sort of know what happened but haven’t digested it, if we ever will.

But aside from that we are coming up on 9/11, which is the big one. Not only the original 9/11 but it is also the 10th anniversary of the Benghazi attack on 9-11-2012. That one showed the inside failure of Obama and his administration in foreign policy. How long did they play the denial of that attack on a loop? Lies, coverups, it had it all.

In turn, Beghazi 9/11 is what led into the Hillary email scandal. It particularly showed the incestuous connection with media, Democrats and power like nothing else.

Except it will be only the much later Jan 6th anniversary that the left and media will care about. They sure as hell don’t care about Benghazi. And anything pointing back at Hillary Clinton is just bad juju for the Left. Avoid that at all costs.

Come to think of it, there are a lot of anniversaries around the Left. It is a smorgasbord, they just don’t like being reminded of them. There is the anniversary of Obamacare, the anniversary of the Iran deal with pallets of cash, for just a few. But recently we have “summer of love 2020” and those 550 riots across the country. Plenty of celebration there.

And Democrats always loved to memorialize the Roe Wade anniversary with lots of pomp and circumstance. I guess we ruined that one though they still have many others.

But this year, can we finally give the Benghazi anniversary the importance it deserves? Brought to you by the same people who gave us the Afghanistan pull out.

 

Right Ring | Bullright | 2022

Biden Disapproval Chart

So here is a look at Biden’s approval trajectory. Notice the obvious intersection at about Aug 29, 2021. What happened then, I wonder?  From there it is all downhill.

(Credit to FiveThirtyEight.com for chart)

 

Quinnipiac now has him at 33%. (and we know the error rate in polls for Dems)

Wow, pretty soon Biden’s approval number is going to intersect with Paul Pelosi’s alcohol levels. But it is nice too see Joe heading a “just say no” campaign.

Many Dems are saying ‘no to Joe’ in 2024.

“Mr Axelrod was one of 50 Democrat officials interviewed by the Times over their “frustrations” about Mr Biden.”

Do you think Joe has enough gas left in his tank to run in ’24?
He looks like he’s running on fumes now.

Well, Biden is not alone anyway. Cratering along with Joe’s approvals is public trust in government, to ‘do the right thing’. According to Pew Research:

“Public trust in government remains low, as it has for much of the 21st century. Only two-in-ten Americans say they trust the government in Washington to do what is right “just about always” (2%) or “most of the time” (19%). Trust in the government has declined somewhat since last year, when 24% said they could trust the government at least most of the time.”

 

The Other 9/11

I was just looking at my calendar and noticed that this September 11th will be the 10th anniversary of Benghazi. My, how time flies when the crooks are running the asylum.

Yes, it is hard to believe since for many of us Benghazi will never go away. It is a stain on the corrupt Obama-Biden administration forever. And it is a permanent blot on the remaining legacy of Hillary Rotten Clinton, for most Americans honoring history.

But actually it was never even a speed bump on her road to be president. She never treated it as a serious event. Beghazi was always dismissed by her, even though she once claimed to take full responsibility for it. She never did. Nor was that ever her intent.

Her life was to go on, rosily in elite political circles. while the events of Benghazi were to disappear like the spring snow. Justice was never an option for Benghazi or HRC.

But patriots like Charlie Daniels would almost daily repeat “Benghazi isn’t going away.” Right, we lost Charlie but it seems like Hillary got her wish. Like everything else she was involved in, Benghazi faded into Hillary’s aura as a nothing — not a blip on her radar.

Hillary, it turned out, was more interested in her future coup d’état than giving survivors of Benghazi or a dead ambassador the time of day. That’s because it was always time for the star of Hillary Clinton to shine — and everything else to take a backseat to that.

The name Benghazi was meant to be as obsolete to history as the horse-drawn carriage is to the car. Only the carriage served a purpose where Benghazi never did for Democrats or Hillary the Rotten’s legacy.

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2022

 

 

Bitter Biden Invasion Scandal

Biden’s administration took over a billion and a half dollars from the COVID relief program to instead fund his illegal immigration operation on the Southern Border.

This week we saw how bitter Biden can be, in two national security areas, toward the country he is supposed to secure and defend.

The administration took 850 million from Covid funds for testing, another 850 million marked for national stockpile supplies to provide hotel, housing and stealth relocation services to illegal immigrants.

So we know how despicable he is. (1.7 bln worth) With a pandemic crisis, Joe is using our money to provide services to illegal aliens. Not only is Biden not combating the immigration crisis, he is facilitating, funding and incentivizing it directly by his administration.

Who can fix this? Can it be fixed?

 

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2022

Poopy Pants Talks To Putin

Biden holds high-level meeting with Putin on secret video tele-comms, on the cusp of Russia staging 175,000 troops on Ukraine’s border. But the real headline is mundane or further shrouded in the secrecy of what was said.

The social media world knows Poopy Pants is just another nickname for Biden – just ask UK’s top Duchess of Cornwall, or insiders close to the Vatican for the play-by-play.

But all we hear from are talking heads, whether they be pundits, analysts, politicians or deadpan anchors for news networks. We don’t hear from the sources, as in this case.

Jake Sullivan ran out to translate for Poopy Pants, rather than have double-aneurysm Joey do two major events in one day. A two-hour conversation with Puti was more than enough stress and activity for hiding Biden. So a third-party interpretation is just what the White House Doc Klain ordered.

And the fluffer-nutter of a press conference with the aspiring Jake-the snake-Sullivan was just the type of low-info briefing the Biden operation loves. Tell them nothing!

Back to pundits verses patriots, But I am a fan of Larry Kudlow. He summed it up nicely by saying all this emphasis on “if” Putin or Russia invades Ukraine was a huge tactical error. What about all they are doing now, and why move the goalpost to the what if? Instead it was all tough talk about “if” they invade, then this or that happens.

Of course, all that posturing and red-line threatening puts us back on the defense rather than playing offense with the Moscow thug. I’ve never been partial to Russia but will commend Vlad if he does something right. In this case, he set the stage by appearing alone at a table verses Biden with his team of hacks. What message is bumbling Biden sending? Who knows? Is it encrypted telepathy?

Even Sullivan’s translation did not reveal real details of their 2-hour chat. He expressed the need for secrecy and confidentiality over transparency. Why, what does Biden have to hide? Remember the Biden Administration had already gifted a nice START Treaty extension/renewal from his first days in office. Except Vladimir didn’t get anything for Biden for Christmas.

No matter. Why can’t Biden be transparent? Is he afraid of what Putin might bring up? Is he concerned about the stakes when his son is knee-deep in grifting for Chop-Suey Joey? Is there a problem with us knowing what was really said?

As Larry Kudlow said, it went all about the “if you invade” instead of the substance of what Russia is engaged in doing. A little late now. We know Biden has already given Putin quite a lot of gains for one year. Is he preparing to offer him more? We can only speculate, but based on the history I think it is fair to surmise.

Once again, as in their meeting before, Putin is not shy about running to microphones to give his side’s interpretation. Maybe Joe would prefer we get details from the KGB side of the stage? You know, if it were Trump they would demand release of the full unedited transcript, complete with pictures.

Not Buzzard Brains Biden, the guy who keeps all of his 4 decades of records sealed in a vault at the Delaware University. Hands off all the inter-person communications and notes. You are not getting those family jewels.

I think we can safely assume that nothing Biden said will prevent Putin from what he plans on doing. That was the purpose of his plans, after all.

 

Here is a poopy for the road to bind you over, from Doc Ron Klain, this time on gas prices as opposed to just gaslighting for Buzzard Brains.

“Energy prices are starting to come down. More work to be done, but they are moving in the right direction.”

 

 

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2021

Back To The Russia Hoax And Dupes

A few people are being indicted in the Durham investigation. They are not government agents and are being generically charged for lying to feds. So that must mean they are just going after the liars not the feds who handled the hoax. That’s the running narrative.

Former prosecutor Andrew McCarthy is pushing this reasoning saying don’t get your hopes up because he is only targeting liars. It doesn’t mean crimes or government officials are complicit. Well this narrative has some flaws. Not that I have a much confidence in Durham’s positive outcome. McCarthy calls it “infuriating but not criminal.” Whether he is just playing down the propects on Durham’s investigation or not, it raises questions.

So then the narrative goes that the feds were duped. It wasn’t really their fault. They didn’t create it. They were fooled. Some say it was just “dirty campaign tricks” but not like there are criminal statutes for that and criminal conduct is another matter. Just walk through it with me.

Let’s remember this innocuous, “dirty campaign trick” (scheme) was rolled into a Special Counsel investigation at over 32 million tax dollars. Feds got duped? How does that happen organically without complicit willful intent? It also eventually got by that Special Counsel, too? Plus it wrecked dozens of lives and careers en route. How’s that just happen?

Now some clever Leftist may come along — not here — to suggest all the investigating and Special Counsel actions by itself demonstrates cause and reason it needed to happen. Justified on that alone.

The investigation justifies itself.

There you have it, the ludicrous defense of the investigation hoax in a nutshell. Use the fact they concocted an elaborate, corrupt investigation (scheme) to justify the Russian Hoax investigation. Use the investigation to substantiate itself. We did it; therefore it must have had to be done.

But the idea doesn’t stop there, because it can’t and was not the objective.

So we are to somehow believe Feds can discern lies from any Joe America — a serious offense for any citizen — but just cannot discern a lie when it comes to campaign hacks or nefarious foreign sources or intelligence operatives with glaringly obvious motives? (even if it was a counter-intelligence investigation.) And it is done in a national presidential election?

Just swallow all that. A counter-intell investigation requires sign off.

So then they (government/intelligence apparatus) enthusiastically uses those lies as a basis for a counter-intelligence investigation, and get dubious warrants, to ambitiously bring in a Special Counsel investigation (h/t to James Comey) of a then sitting president and National Security advisor of the United States.

Yeah, what are the odds on that happening without any willful intent to harpoon the new/incoming administration? Vegas anyone? Without the feds, government and their malicious conduct none of this happens. Now what are the odds this happens organically on the level?

But wait for it. Then they use — in press and media to defend their activities — the investigation itself to justify their investigation. Long shot?

But one more thing, we now know Dir. Brennan notified Justice Dep and even briefed Obama in August 2016 that Hillary’s campaign was running a dirty operation to accuse Trump of working with Russians. (a frame job)

Now if they are going to charge a few for lying and call it a day, it does not stand any test of basic credibility. So we cannot say laws were broken and crimes were committed in all of that? What of election law?

If that doesn’t rise to the level of some major, indictable crimes then get ready for the next viscous election. It’ll be a doozy! (I promise)

 

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2021

Free Speech Or Risky Speech?

How would you like it if there were a committee of people assembled in your town who got to decide whether or not you have free speech to participate in the public square? Or if you will be banned from access to the same resources everyone else communicates with?

Well, that is what Facebook is rolling out over whether Trump has free speech and access to the public square or not? Of course, in this case they decided that no, in fact, he does not. He shall remain banned and shunned like a leper, well, at least for six more months. What happens then? Maybe their “high Committee” will gather for another verdict.

If any of it sounds absurd, it should. What if you were treated the same way? All it takes is them declaring you a risk and unpalatable. Supposedly Zuckerberg went to the trouble of having this so-called independent committee decide Trump’s fate. But essentially, it could be our fate as well, and will be, since we can all be given the same ostracized treatment.

It comes down to their verdict of whether one’s speech is free speech or risky speech, or if their empowered committee cancels your participation rights or not? But never tell these arrogant lords of social media that their own right to exist or function is contingent on approval of some “mob” or “committee” — either one amounts to the same thing.

In the end, anything that may be a risk or threat to their power is branded an intolerable risk that cannot be allowed, because it  threatens their habitat and power. Isn’t that what this is all about, their habitat and its preservation? They get to decide who is allowed into their ever-expansive habitat and who is not. But then they don’t live by their own rules, yet they hold the cancel button for everyone else in their hands.

In this hierarchy, there are no appeals or other arbiters, all decisions and cancellations are final. If the mob decides you should be deleted, you are. They control town square and those in it. Who made big-tech kings? I thought America did not accept such royalty.

Josh Hawley gave us a preview even before his book comes out. And now that it is coming out, despite their cancel attempts, the Left are even more enraged than before.

What else is new, we have a president whose Justice Department is targeting his political opponents. Rudy Giuliani is raided like some criminal. Notice how days after news came out about John Kerry collaborating and sharing classified intelligence with the Iranians, it is suddenly time to round up Rudy. Great diversion and defensive tactics. Do you think we’ll ever see John Kerry rounded up and raided for what he was doing for four years? Nah. Have you ever thought such things were possible in America?

That is the problem, it doesn’t feel like America with these things happening. This is not democracy or America; it is anti-American. And part of the country wants it that way.

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2021

Throwing Down The Gauntlet

In most major stories there is usually the good guys and the bad guys. Sometimes it is hard to tell which is which. In the past, things were simpler where those lines seemed clearly drawn. Not so now.

Today it feels more muddled and not just in the movies, where Hollywood likes to push those limitations to the max. Even intentionally confusing.

This is especially the case today in law enforcement. But still if you really look at the facts and examine it, you can tell which is which. Those lines are furthered blurred when you cannot give the benefit of doubt to one side.

So its possible you can have the old good cop bad cop routine. You can also have a good cop doing something nefarious, which doesn’t make sense. You could have a bad cop trying to do something that appears righteous, using unconventional means. Or you could have the bad cop doing the same acts that corrupt the system.

You could have a good cop not doing what he needs to do intervening. A good cop could be prevented from doing what is the right thing. Restrictions could make the right thing impossible. You have all these different scenarios outside the normal boundaries of law enforcement. But you also have cops themselves making judgments on right or wrong, with a potential for error.

Why say all this and point out these nuances? Because they become possibilities when it is not obvious who the good guy is in a situation. So it can be, or seem to be, confusing. I think people like clearer lines.

Put on top of that that we usually don’t get those kind of mitigating or condemning factors from press reports. It looks confusing at first glance.

That confusion is where a lot of things can happen, like public perception or outrage or where narratives form. Good can seem bad and bad can seem good. Wrong can be replaced by righteous motive. Right can be clouded by appearance of conspiracy. Right can be condemned for the wrong reasons.

We are human and make these judgments based on what we see and what we know at the time — which often matters. Our judgments are not prefect either. The facts can make it hard to decipher who is right or wrong?

The same thing plays out in politics. Who is right or, if both are wrong, who has the higher ground? Granted these are complex judgments but we are capable of making them, as long as we have the facts and evidence. But when we don’t have those, it makes it almost impossible to make correct conclusions. So a lot of things can hang out in the “I just don’t know” category. Those await more information for us to make those calls.

We can say it doesn’t look good or it doesn’t look bad on our first impressions, yet we just don’t know. Pending. A lot of things are pending where the jury is still out, as they say. Maybe that is a good place to be, or maybe that is not necessarily good. It all depends.

Why go through this rationale at all? Because at some point it matters in a lot of instances. Sometimes it is important and sort of requires fast conclusions where we are not able to render one. Sometimes it is important to take considerable time in making it. Thus, the rush to judgment.

Long for the days when you watched a movie when it was very obvious who was the good guy and who was the bad guy. It seemed to make things simpler. But it doesn’t seem that way today.

When you combine this with systemic problems in systems, it muddies those waters further. When there is corruption on the scale we’ve seen recently, it raises the complexity of a judgment call. While we still know that some things are obviously wrong, they are deliberately shrouded in a systemic pool of corruption to determine who is really at fault.

Remember the old line from Germans that they were only following orders. As if all these things were not enough, put on top of that historical precedents like corruption that never happened before. (never seen) Historical, unprecedented failures and corruption.

You have to use all this to preface the situation we are now in. Sure, we can have an election and get the result that some nefarious people/groups want, for their own purposes, but that doesn’t make it right or legit. It cannot legitimize the process.

Sure, we can have an investigation in search of a justification for the investigation. Sure, we can do an impeachment over things that are normal or legal to do, just because we are determined to have an impeachment.

Sure, we can fail to get answers to things, which were done collectively through the power of state, where no one can seem to be held responsible. Sure, we can have major failures of trust in our institutions then turn around to bestow more power on them, after they thoroughly abused their authority. But who is to stop these things from happening; who will prevent them?

So we can count on courts, those arbiters of the facts. But they are not always given the whole truth. What happens then? We can have faulty outcomes from those entrusted to be the guardrails for law and order.

At some point, we the people have to make our own judgments about all these things, and the consequences, but that process can get very messy. And the mileage varies.

It can get even messier when self-government is stood on its head. We were designed as a republic (if you can keep it) but are leaning toward mob rule – and not necessary a democratic mob. That is a mob which, at its heart, does not care about majority; doesn’t care who is right, doesn’t even care about the rules. It is entirely demand-based. It wants what it wants and it wants it now. It doesn’t care about deliberative, due process. It only wants to be satisfied, which by nature it can never be. It will always be wanting.

How is it that we the people have to deal with all these things and yet are expected to make the right decisions and judgments on everything? We are the guardians expected to keep that republic, but can we when its obstruction prevents that from happening?

We the people need to make some serious, life-affecting decisions. Can we save what is rightfully ours to save? Can we be depended on, by future posterity, to do the right thing given all these circumstances?

May God grant us the wisdom necessary.

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2021

Institutional Failure

We no longer have the luxury of debating serious concepts or ideas, but can only opine on current political reality. As long as we still can anyway.

But this column or next just might be the last, at this critical stage. Who knows? That is the political reality of the time. Just call this an SOS to the future.

Odd how America was always standing up for those timeless principles and freedoms like speech or basic civil liberties. Not anymore. That is the stuff of yesteryear now.

All of this in our current reality is due to institutional failure. No, it is not just a president’s dictate or even Congress’s decrees; it takes more than that to really set our country off the irreversible edge. Our institutions have a big and necessary role in that condition, not only governmental institutions but private or non-governmental institutions.

Right now they are screaming for us to jump, “don’t look back. Hurry up!”

Who are they? Well, media for one has a big role. But there are plenty others like policy centers, research labs to big corporations to technology, universities, education. All working hand and glove in a concerted, malicious way against civil liberties of people is enough to throw in the towel on society — as if government failure and corruption were not enough of a problem.

But all operating in a concerted effort, until you have something that makes George Orwell blush in his grave. And snark is substituted for substance in defense of what they do. So what is the answer to that? Well, we don’t know because we probably were never to this pinnacle before. Sadly, we just don’t know.

Institutions are to society what sin is to mankind. It is the cancerous rot that can destroy the body from inside out. If left corrupt and untreated, it can unleash a ticking clock on the mantle of freedom and all we hold dear. Or you could call that the glue or ligaments that hold us all together. And what a number both can do on us in a short amount of time.

So now a first amendment case to defend one’s self is no longer an acceptable option?

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2021

Cleansing Agenda Of The Left

Now that I see what I see, I conclude if Joe Biden lost and Trump won, this riot at the Capitol would look like child’s play. They didn’t board up cities and businesses from Trump people. It was the crazed left, who couldn’t deal with reality for 4 years, who ripped the country apart. Democrats would be standing in the middle of it, if not organizing violence.

Maybe it would look like a hurricane in different places all at once, going on for days. It is their way. In fact, the case can now be made that part of the reason for the election results, besides fraud, was because some people were afraid what the Left would do if Trump won.

The Left had stoked up those fears for months and months.There is no doubt about it. Chief Justice Roberts mentioned riots in considering any election disputes.

Sunday Marco Rubio referred to the Capitol riot telling Maria Bartiromo he could not think of a better talking point for China than the violence. But no, Marco, I can think of a better talking point for China: what Congress is doing now with snap Impeachment and purge schemes of members of Congress. (Also Senators)

Secondly, the Big Tech take down of a President and people on Twitter with a take down of Parler. With more bans by the hour. Yes that is a better talking point for China and the CCP. Much better. It makes it harder for us to criticize their dissent crackdown.

In fact, you have to admit it is hard to complain about China stomping down protests of political opponents or to complain about Hong Kong and freedom after this massive crackdown. They smear all Republicans and Trump supporters as responsible.

Look at the names they have already labeled them. Insurrectionists, domestic terrorists.Biden even called them Anti-Semites and white supremacists. Gee, remember when we called people thugs? They said that was a racist dog whistle? Calling the radical rioters “a mob” in the summer was racist language. Their protests were democratic.

Actually, that is the point. They have been calling us every name under the book with racists for four years. We were treated as some kind of animals. When actually it was the left acting on instinct like animals rioting on command, spontaneously. They cannot bury all that. But Michelle Obama said in a written statement:

Seeing the gulf between the responses to yesterday’s riot and this summer’s peaceful protests and the larger movement for racial justice is so painful. It hurts. I cannot think about moving on or turning the page until we reckon with the reality of what we saw yesterday.”

After diverting from Obama and Biden blame, they reversed to their true Left form. Pursuing that same 4-year coup. Since the 2020 campaign, they lectured that one cannot attack or criticize political opponents or one’s predecessors. They used it as the pretense for last impeachment. No accusations or stories can spread like they banned the NY Post.

No, this episode at the Capitol was not a coup like the Left is calling it. The coup was over the last five years. Democrats used every asset or means available.

Now it is all about attacking their political opponents. And they are casting a wide net on Congressman, Senators, anyone on the right, all their political opponents. Open season and fair game on all. Democrats in Congress think they have the power to remove Republicans, and run them out of Washington. Use this to go after their political opponents.

All incorporated into their cleansing and purging campaign. Every political opponent they deem a problem, they want to use the opportunity to remove and destroy them. It is being amped up even higher by mainstream media. And then it is us. But who is doing all the purging? Radical Left anti-speech goon squads. Cancel and deplatform people too.

Abc News had this op-ed saying exactly what was on the docket of the Left. You see the problem is not just Trump, it is all of us on right, those who supported President Trump. This article ran after Wednesday.

[Tweet] Trump will be an ex-president in 13 days. The fact is that getting rid of Trump is the easy part. Cleansing the movement he commands is going to be something else. — Rick Klein Twitter @ABCJanuary 7, 2021

He later deleted that Tweet but here was his article it referred to.

“Even aside from impeachment and 25th Amendment talk, Trump will be an ex-president in 13 days. The fact is that getting rid of Trump is the easy part,”

“Cleansing the movement he commands, or getting rid of what he represents to so many Americans, is going to be something else.” — says Rick Klein.

So let the cleansing begin, visions of Hitler dancing in their brains. Glee.
Kyle Herrig, president of the group Accountable.US said :

“The officials immediately responsible for the administration’s harm should not be applauded for handing in their two weeks’ notice just days before President Trump’s term is up — nor should they be able to seek refuge in corporate boardrooms and universities after Inauguration Day. These officials should instead be recognized for what they are: responsible for and complicit in immeasurable suffering.

Former CIA director and venomous Trump critic, John Brennan:

Jan 9, 2020 – “Anyone now seeking national redemption by claiming to no longer support Trump must acknowledge how wrong it was to ignore & enable his corrupt, dishonest, & divisive agenda. Total denunciation of a despot’s legacy is necessary to eradicate any remaining malignancy.”

Jan 6, 2020 – “Every politician, government official, journalist, & talk show host who has ignored & enabled Trump’s lies & corruption bears responsibility for the damage he has wrought. Spare us the excuses. You failed the test of citizenship. It is now up to you to try to redeem yourselves.”

Michelle Obama said before Trump’s Twitter was shut down.

“The day was a fulfillment of the wishes of an infantile and unpatriotic president who can’t handle the truth of his own failures. And the wreckage lays at the feet of a party and media apparatus that gleefully cheered him on, knowing full well the possibility of consequences like these,” Obama wrote.

“Now is the time for Silicon Valley companies to stop enabling this monstrous behavior—and go even further than they have already by permanently banning this man from their platforms and putting in place policies to prevent their technology from being used by the nation’s leaders to fuel insurrection.”

Michelle also wrote, in her thoughts:

“…that together [Warnock and Ossoff] they’ll help give control of Congress back to the only party that’s shown that it can put our democracy above its own short-term political fortunes.”

Really? A party that puts politics above everything, who did not even recognize the results of the last election for four years, who openly said they were in resistance and ran the coup. A wonderful party of sedition and treason. That party?

Senator Jon Tester: @SenatorTester

I have damn little respect for people who wrap themselves in the flag and then try to burn this country down. — Jan 8

You need to visit Portland and Seattle. Then talk to a few of your sympathizing colleagues. They’ll sure appreciate your sentiments. Well, I saw a country in flames all summer long.

Just in, a Cumulus Media memo says they’ll crack down on hosts, possibly banning, for using fraud rhetoric or arguing with election results. Where were they four years ago?

Top Wall Street banks are putting a stop on political donations after violence at the Capitol. It’s probably until spring. Ah, just in time for Joe. PGA says it will pull its championship from the Trump Bedminister, NJ course in 2022.

Did we ever see a fallout or repercussions to Democrats for fueling resistance and sedition? I’m pretty sure they made money on the exchange. Have they issued any statements?

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2021

Biden Truth Deficit

Something is fairly wrong. Reports say that 1 in 6 Biden voters said if they knew the Hunter story, or Biden’s career of corruption, they never would have voted for him.

Well how does that translate? In my math that means 13 million less votes. Or Biden would have only had 67 million votes, even with all the fraud and shenanigans.

That verses Trump’s 74 million votes. See what truth will do for you?

Joe Biden is running one hell of a truth deficit.

(And how the other 66.67 million rationalized their votes is another matter.)

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2021

Say It Isn’t So Joe, And Company

Is it time to demonize the Biden supporters and voters? Yes it is. Oh it is past time. In fact it is long overdue, but very necessary. Who says satire can’t be delicious? Here we go:

Just remember this above everything: these are the people.

These are the people who stood and cheered Hitler on in the 30’s. When Hitler made the trains run on time, these are the people who made it all possible. These are the very same people. The DNA is exacting science. No dispute.

These are the same people who enthusiastically whisked Hitler into power.

These are the people who never spoke up when Jews were dragged from their homes. These are the people who turned in their neighbors and then family members.

These are the people who donned the brown shirts to support the Fuehrer and punish enemies of the 3td Reich lurching within. These were the enforcers, the purge facilitators. These are the people who stomped out any resistance before it rose above a whisper.

So remember, this is who they are. They are the friends of the police state, the necessary pawns of the institutional elite that galvanized evil in its infancy. And proud of it.

These are the people who answered the orders when Lenin counseled to probe with bayonets; if you encounter mush proceed, if you encounter steel withdraw.

These are the people who allowed Maduro to take power in Venezuela. The people who empowered Hugo Chavez. The same ones who ushered in the revolution in Cuba.

These are the people who made Jonestown possible, the same people who gave Rev Jim Jones his power. They are the very same people who, when Jones issued the final order, they are the people who made certain their friends and family drank the Kool-Aid before guzzling down a gulp themselves. These are the people who held babies’ arms while pouring the poison into their mouths. These are the same people who made it all happen.

Since my belief in this makes me morally superior as judge, jury and executioner, I have so decided and therefore it is indisputable fact. They all stand condemned.

Take the medicine. Salivate, and then choke on it. Let it burn going down your throats.

~~~~

Now the only good news in all of that is clear. This can be redeemable for all of us. The Left will undoubtedly follow their own new standard they created. They hold the solution.

So we must now have, according to their new rules, by what they themselves have done to Trump, an investigation and coup launched before Biden takes office. Because, according to the rules, after he assumes office he will only be a defiled resident – illegitimate squatter.

There must be immediate impeachment proceedings started, ratified by public fiat. The de facto case will be made, based on what all he has done to this point, he cannot and will not ever be president. He must be removed and everything he did deemed illegitimate.

Then he and his complicit VP will have to resign in shame based on insurmountable evidence. It is not even contested. So his supporters would also agree and demand he does,

Surely they will comply since this is their own solution. We mst follow the Left’s prescription immediately. It is the only way to save the world.

Then maybe we would have some peace. That would be real justice. Let them now live up to their own standards. (I use the term loosely)

Baring those results and necessary outcome, all Democrats and officials of this government must stand up to defy any action of this illegitimate faux president. They are required to stand up in defiance as an enforceable act of resistance to this illegitimate phony. Anyone who doesn’t follow orders will suffer excruciating and permanent consequences for it.

BTW: here is a comment that is making the rounds on Twitter.
.

“Dear Joe, I’m happy you won. However, there will never be a time in my life when I ever forgive Trump, Pence, Mitch McConnell or Barr & the Republicans in congress who fought tooth and nail against Democracy. Please prosecute trump, his family, & every seditious republican!”

Sedition, you want to talk about sedition now? Oh, that’s rich!

Yes, demonization of Democrats and the Left is way too good for them considering what they’ve done. Ol’ Iggy says he has the tar and the pitchforks ready, if needed.

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2020

The Biden Syndicate

In honor of Jeopardy and Alex Trebek, I think I’ll go with Joe Biden for 10 million, please. That’s an excellent category.

Hunter Biden gets the rap for Joe Biden’s scandal but we miss the other connections.

Interesting that defenders of Biden will say these are other people, maybe even family members, but they are not Joe Biden. It leads to the latest talking point that their names were not on the ballot, Joe Biden was on the ballot. Maybe they were?

Then Tony Bobulinski toppled this world of spin with two words, saying the secret to the Biden MO was “plausible deniability.” That is to keep Joe’s direct fingerprints off of it. So everyone can always deny it. To that extent, Joe Biden et al were paranoid about that.

Obama was a big adherent of the same plausible deniability strategy. Funny how it works for Democrats. By design, which is what criminal minds and the RICO statute are all about.

That plausible deniability works until you have such a mountain of evidence and facts that you can no longer deny any connectivity to the deeds or the results. Finally, it becomes a flawed defense when all the deniability catches up to you.

The outcome is Joe and Jill Biden live a lavish lifestyle in mansions on a meager Senate salary, with a school-teacher wife, and no one dares ask how? How did they live in the most exclusive area in VA, in a former Hague mansion that is a 20k per/month estate? No one knows and no one cares. Or afford their million-plus-dollar home at the shore?

Look into Joe’s background sometime, like an old piece in Mother Jones (Nov ‘19). Still no one even cared to look at it before running old Joe up the platform as the little guy.

But beyond Hunter, Joes brother James has been very busy and media has not descended on that mountain of scandal so far. No interest. Oh, that’s just Joe’s brother, Dems will say. But that is the point, it is Joe’s brother.

And being Joe’s brother is certainly not lost on James. He built enormous deals based on the fact that he is Joe’s brother and of course Joe running for, and getting elected, president. That was the whole point of his hospital scandal still unfolding in PA.

Basically he was sued for stealing the operational blueprint for hospitals and began hawking it like his own. But that was only part of the whole scandal. The extent of James’ career in trading off of Joe’s name is far more lucrative and extensive. It takes a mindset to think like that when you read the details of the hospital venture.

A question surfaces if James was trying to destroy the company he allied with, on the basis that his brother Joe, if elected, would incorporate the plans into national policy? Then a M-East investment that never matterialized. It takes a scheming mind. There is far more there and mainstream hasn’t gone near it. It is in courts and apparently investigations.

Behind all of it was James Biden representing and selling himself as Joe’s younger brother – and what influence that could bring to any business relationship. It is the whole point of everything. The center of the universe is that he is Joe Biden’s brother. He was trading on the Joe Biden, now a family heirloom, name.

So with what we know of the Hunter Biden deal, or his brother’s, one salient point remains paramount in all. Simply put: without Joe Biden, there is no Hunter Biden… or no James Biden, or no Frank Biden. All of them traded on Joe Biden’s name, as if he were a Dupont. Joe was involved in the deals; it was constructed around him – as if it were a dynasty.

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2020

Change The World

Euphoric aspirations about changing the world have been around for a long time. We like to think it is based on something other than hope.

Obama pretty much fueled his campaign on such notions, based on invisible rationale. He ran an entire movement on adherents to his con. He predicted seas would cease to rise. He was no more successful than the false hope he promoted.

Another person will come along promising to change the world. False hope will be in bountiful supply. Will they? Will people who graft onto false hope really change the world? It is doubtful.

It does not stop the aspirations of people trying. They believe they figured out something you and I don’t know. They found the secret sauce. If it were only that easy?

Reality sort of bites you in the ass every now and then. It can dash hopes faster than a torpedoed submarine. “We get it,” they always say. “But you can’t stop us from trying.” Maybe not.

Though circumstances do matter. If we cannot change the results of a rigged election, then how can we change the world? If we cannot keep corruption at bay, or preserve justice, how then will they change the whole world?

Leftists never offered any evidence they could change the world, they just asserted it. Remember the Arab spring Obama was excited about? It turned into one of the most awful things we’ve seen. But they had all their hopes on it anyway. Never mind results.

Now here we are, off of the worst corrupted election in modern times and so many act as if this is all normal. Nothing to see here. People even say it was smooth as silk. We know and they know that can’t be right. But who cares anyway, if they got the result they wanted?

Joe Biden told Stacy Abrams that if they had 10 more like her, they could rule the world. There’s a scary thought. But what would he do with that power? Too many questions.

So full of themselves are they that all logic and reason has been evicted from the equation. They think and perceive, therefore it is. How arrogant is that?

When it is time to evaluate the results of their schemes, suddenly their defense is silent. Then it is time to move on. They meant well. It was the intent that matters. But history and the world move on, no better for the wear. Scars mean nothing to a world on fire.

Is it any wonder some of us are jaded at their baseless optimism? However, denial doesn’t stop them. They said it therefore it is. They are gods of destiny and the sky is the limit.

Not all change is good either. Have we established that yet? They changed all the rules for elections, which seem to be here to stay. What have we gotten in exchange? What are the results? Time convicts their insanity but “have another bite of that mushroom, it’s good for what ails you.” Maybe they just did not exert the proper amount of force last time.

“So keep on trying, we’re getting closer.”

Meanwhile, democracy – if that is what they are still calling it – has taken a backseat to their whims of authoritarian rule. All they need is enough force to fulfill all their pleasures. And we see a lot of proof of what their pleasures really are.

So we should not look closer at all the fraud in the election if the results wouldn’t have been different. But who says results would not have changed? The purpose is to look.

Change the world, change our elections, change our system, change our laws, change presidents; notice a pattern?

While we are at it, let’s just change back to what it was five years ago, before the coup went down. Let’s change back to what the people rejected in 2016.

They can change the world but we cannot change fraud in elections – don’t bother trying.

Joe Biden now says: (just some latest quotes in the timeline)

“I know you’re probably tired of hearing about politics after this year. But with just 15 days left until the Georgia Senate runoffs, we can’t take our foot off the gas.”

“Georgia — Your vote has the power to change the future of this country. Don’t wait to use it.”

Translation: what Biden really means is: in one month we begin to heel.

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2020

Special Counsel Delivery

A brand new joke: so a guy walks into a restaurant – back when they used to be open — and the waiter asks him “what would you like?”

The man says to the waiter “I’ll have a nice juicy special counsel.”

The waiter says, “coming right up, sir.”

Okay, it is a joke people. I didn’t say it was funny. Get it?

Now that we know AG Bill Barr converted John Durham into a Special Counsel that was the reaction of some people, “This is a joke.” But no it really wasn’t a joke. They only think it is a joke. It’s the guy at the restaurant who said he wants a special counsel, and is entitled to get what he wants. So give him what he wants.

Under U.S. code, the special counsel would produce a “confidential report” and is ordered to “submit to the Attorney General a final report, and such interim reports as he deems appropriate in a form that will permit public dissemination.”

If what I said doesn’t make sense at all, then don’t worry about it.

The important thing is that Barr appointed Durham Special Counsel without anyone knowing it on October 19th. Now he tells us what he did. I for one am glad.

Would I prefer not to have special counsels? Yeah, but after all we have gone through over five years, then let’s have the special counsel. If it were ever justifiable, this is it.

No, I don’t care to hear Leftist loons bemoaning about it. Done.

Well, it sure is not the last we are going to hear about or from this special counsel of ours. Just ignore that new-car smell, you’ll get used to it.

“I think there will be more indictments,” Ratcliffe said in October. “Based on the intelligence I have access to, I certainly believe there should be.”

Gee, I remember one Christmas saying “if I could have anything, I’d like to have a brand new special counsel.” Now here it is in 2020 and I finally got one. I’m not sure what to do with it but here it is. Once the training wheels come off, this thing will be great,

So that’s kind of the way I feel about this new Special Counsel.

It was the thought that counts. Appreciate the sentiments.

(Hope it has a warranty)

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2020

Accountability Zero

Why does this country have such an accountability deficit? To weigh that, I looked into both sides. I see a lot of the same problems within. Guess where it comes from?

It requires a quick trip down memory lane just to illuminate the problem.

Take it back to 2016. I’ve written much about that primary and the nomination shake out. In the end, Trump had the nomination then won the race. Start right there.

The reason he won had much to do with the lack of accountability in the same old establishment politics and process. So people got fed up and wanted to reign in power.

Okay, so it was nasty and we know what happened. Once elected, the Left planted their feet in resistance. Again, expected. As Trump started to line up his cabinet and team, remember what happened? More resistance on everything he did.

The left said they would brand everyone who took a job in the administration. They wanted a full boycott of Trump positions. Fortunately, Trump was picking from a different pool and managed to find enough people willing to serve.

That did not stop the left though. Then they threatened anyone who took a position that they would not work in DC again. But the officials did so anyway, putting it on the line.

If these threats were not enough to keep them from joining, then what were the benefits, if any, of joining Trump’s administration? I don’t know about all, except there was an idea positive results would prevail over time, and on what they would accomplish. If they hung in, those results would vindicate them. People would see it and feel the outcome.

So there was risk but was worth a chance because they were going to change status quo, which had not gotten positive results. Plus Trump was making a point to put America First instead of last. Team Trump had no interest in leading from behind.

But the Lockstep Left was out to make that as hard as possible – hopefully to drive Trump out. Those are facts. Democrats made no secret of it, from boycotting his inauguration to keeping an investigation going as a basis for removal. Again, undisputed facts.

Trump operated in that backdrop despite protests and sedition. The administration went to work to prove all their ignorant assumptions wrong. Well, those results/outcomes should have satisfied most people, other than hard-line Marxists, or staunch anti-Trumpers – for their own reasons. That should satisfy the people en masse.

One must go through the entire primary context to see what people wanted and what they opposed. But one demand was accountability. If we got that much, it would help correct our entire course. Many of us believed eventually we would get that accountability. It might take some work but we would get it, one way or another.

So accountability was further defined. It was just basic accountability that we should expect from government but until then was totally absent. We were not asking much.

Threats on Trump and his administration continued. It evolved into an impeachment over a phone call. It offered a hint. That call was about accountability for what Biden-Obama did in foreign affairs, like Ukraine. Selling out the country was real — not in regards to Trump but regarding Biden and Obama. We know where that ended up.

Fast forward, we had an election that the Left cheered as a Biden victory. But hold your horses, it was not that clear. Never mind, says the Left, we got this. But no one else asked any accountability questions of Biden. Then they moved to start Biden’s team for 2021.

And this completes the tale of accountability.

I’m not disputing it all, just stating what they did. Along the way, they declared everyone who had worked in the administration or supported Trump be blacklisted. Remember they started that way. Sure enough, Dems were taking names telling people they would not work in public or private sectors again. What had Trump done?

Actually he was pretty successful. And the left kept insisting this election was about the pandemic, which they politicized and weaponized. The positive results still stand, too numerous to list. Democrats claimed the election was accountability for leadership.

Democrats wanted revenge against Trump, and everyone to pay. They call this some kind of twisted accountability – redefining the term. Remember mpeachment, investigations fell flat, They call this accountability? All the good they refuse to talk about.

Now if you boiled all of it down to a common denominator, it is accountability. The left wants an accountability, like revenge, to prevent it from happening again, Therefore, blacklisting is accountability. They redefined the term.

Conservatives on the right want real accountability. That’s all it was ever about to us. Simply to hold those accountable for what they did. Is that too much to ask?

The differences are crystallizing in recent events. Look how they are treating Trump and anyone connected to the administration. Now look at the team Biden is putting together. Any echoes or hints of accountability? It’sthe opposite; a slap in the face.

We see old guard, swamp creatures who were part of the problems for a decade. Sullivan, Kerry, Biden, Antony Blinkin, Rice. Plenty more to come, drawn from that same pool.

Biden set out to plant deep state creatures back into government to shore up its operation. His slogan is “build back better.” Really? That means deep state. Joe Biden’s people are also inquiring within bureaus and departments about any changes Trump made. So the first mission is reverse changes. Revert to the deep state paradigm.

They do know how to do that, they created it.

Now Dems will assure us they are very responsible, that they will be held accountable. Complete nonsense. Accountability is what they are programmed to prevent..

However, look at this political jihad against Trump people. Biden’s people have been a part of this contortion and corruption of government for decades. No accountability for that.

But those career Swamp-insiders are not scorned, blacklisted, harassed or banished from public or private sectors. They are swooned over and welcomed. If not in government, they are sought as experts in media — as advocates of effective, rational government.

Unaccountability has been normalized and institutionalized.

Accountability is starting to look like fools’ gold, where only fools think it is real.

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2020

Biden Transition Needs Access?

I have a semi-serious question. Does anyone think Biden and his team of intellectual thugs are sitting in a room just fretting over when and whether they can get access for their transition team to work with the White House? And how fast?

Or are they more aptly conniving and honing their strategy to keep us from knowing what they will do, and what it will do to the country? And keeping it all from the country?

I bet on the later. But that answers the first part. They aren’t so concerned about the transition as much as they are in fooling people about everything they will do. (dependent on media to keep us ignorant.) Democrats don’t have whistleblowers; no one talks.

So this would mean their complaints are a pure ruse that Biden is concerned about the transition, and how any delays may cost time and lives. They don’t actually care about that. They would only use the dead for political fodder anyway. That is not hyperbole.

This mad rush to get Biden in the loop is so preposterous. The guy who was co-pilot in the last administration. If he doesn’t know the job or his way around the place now, then he should never have run for the job. The people around him are career insiders. They just had a four-year break. So they are only returning. Need to get up to speed? Please.

Need to get briefed on all the vaccine distribution plans? Give it a rest. Biden ran on Covid and had all those elaborate plans to fix everything, didn’t he? He’s the mad scientist of pandemics. He’s the guy with all the plans, which is why gullible people voted for him.

He was a useless sidekick for Obama before but now he is Einstein. The White House is his lightning bolt and the world is his grounding rod. Who needs any access with that?

He’s supposed to have all the answers. He had the answer for Flynn, using the Logan Act. Now his team needs information? Ironic, the co-captain of the coup needs information.

National security? Well, that never bothered him or Obama before — not for a second.

So….number 2 of the coup is looking out for you?

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2020

Hiding Biden

There is a theory that a Biden residency would only be a stark reminder of all the problems with status quo politics and how bad things can be. The dark winter candidate, indeed.

It definitely is an insult to turn the clock back to the Obama years, as if it were the answer. In eight years, they could not show us the benefits or how we were better off for all their radicalism and specious globalism — leading from behind, chanting “don’t do stupid shit.”

It only proved that Americans did not want that.

In fact, this election demonstrated people don’t want socialism. They don’t want globalist tyranny. When socialism and radicalism are on the ballot, people reject it.

But those were always on the ballot with Obama, only people chose not to see it. When faced directly with it, people are repulsed by the ideas. Marxism is not attractive.

A return to Biden, in the wake of Obama misery, would be a forced reminder of corruption, politics of status quo, ruling class elites and the establishment we had rejected.

It will only be a reminder of our real, true resistance to all that assails the American dream. A regime so ideally simpatico with all that becomes a giant flashing light. So this charade cannot go on unabated, unchallenged. It becomes a symbol for the evil it generates.

That will conjure to the fore all that Biden, with Obmma as well, are hiding. The corruption of Joe is a metaphor for it all. A reminder of what we oppose, exposed in broad daylight.

A term of rejection

Right Ring | Bullright | © 2020